Efficacy and safety of budesonide and formoterol in one pressurised metered-dose inhaler in adults and adolescents with moderate to severe asthma: a randomised clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are the preferred maintenance therapy for adults and children with mild, moderate and severe persistent asthma, with the addition of a long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist to ICS therapy recommended for patients with moderate or severe persistent asthma. The efficacy and safety of the combination of budesonide and formoterol delivered via dry powder inhaler (DPI) is well documented. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of budesonide/formoterol pressurised metered-dose inhaler (budesonide/formoterol pMDI; Symbicort pMDI, AstraZeneca LP, Wilmington, DE, USA) with budesonide pMDI (Pulmicort pMDI, Astra [corrected] Zeneca, Lund, Sweden), formoterol DPI (Oxis Turbuhaler, AstraZeneca, Lund, Sweden), budesonide plus formoterol in separate inhalers (budesonide pMDI + formoterol DPI) and placebo. STUDY DESIGN: This was a 12-week randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: This multicentre study was conducted in the respiratory specialty clinical practice setting. PATIENTS: The study included 596 patients > or =12 years of age with moderate to severe persistent asthma previously receiving ICSs. INTERVENTIONS: After 2 weeks on budesonide pMDI 80 microg x two inhalations (160 microg) twice daily, patients received budesonide/formoterol pMDI 160 microg/4.5 microg x two inhalations (320 microg/9 microg); budesonide pMDI 160 microg x two inhalations (320 microg) + formoterol DPI 4.5 microg x two inhalations (9 microg); budesonide pMDI 160 microg x two inhalations (320 microg); formoterol DPI 4.5 microg x two inhalations (9 microg); or placebo twice daily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: There were two prespecified primary efficacy variables: mean change from baseline in morning predose forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)), obtained approximately 12 hours after the most recent administration of study medication at home and immediately before the next administration of study medication at the clinic; and mean change from baseline in 12-hour FEV(1), assessed as the average change in FEV(1) from serial spirometry over the 12-hour period after administration of the morning dose of study medication at the clinic. RESULTS: Mean changes from baseline in morning predose FEV(1) at end of treatment were greater (p < or = 0.049) with budesonide/formoterol pMDI (0.19L) versus budesonide pMDI (0.10L), formoterol DPI (-0.12L) and placebo (-0.17L). Mean changes from baseline in 12-hour FEV(1) were greater (p < or = 0.001) with budesonide/formoterol pMDI after 1 day (0.37L), 2 weeks (0.34L) and at end of treatment (0.37L) versus budesonide pMDI (0.11, 0.15 and 0.15L) and placebo (0.09, -0.03 and -0.03L), and after 2 weeks and at end of treatment versus formoterol DPI (0.19 and 0.17L). Fewer (p < or = 0.025) patients receiving budesonide/formoterol pMDI versus monoproducts or placebo met worsening asthma criteria. Results were similar in the budesonide/formoterol pMDI group and the budesonide pMDI + formoterol DPI group on all measures. All treatments were well tolerated with similar safety profiles. CONCLUSIONS: In this population, twice-daily budesonide/formoterol pMDI provides asthma control significantly greater than the monocomponents or placebo and comparable with budesonide pMDI + formoterol DPI. Safety profiles were similar for all treatments.     

Budesonide/formoterol: a review of its use in asthma

Budesonide and formoterol have been combined in a single dry powder device, Symbicort Turbuhaler (budesonide/formoterol 160/9-640/18 microg/day), in an effort to simplify asthma management. The efficacy of budesonide/formoterol as maintenance therapy in patients with asthma has been examined in several randomised studies.Twice-daily budesonide/formoterol was significantly more effective than an equivalent or higher daily dose of budesonide alone or high-dose fluticasone propionate alone at improving peak expiratory flow (PEF) in adults with predominantly moderate persistent asthma. Symptom control and the risk of mild exacerbations were significantly improved versus budesonide alone. Moreover, budesonide/formoterol appeared to be as effective as concurrent therapy with equivalent dosages of budesonide and formoterol administered via separate inhalers in adults with moderate persistent asthma. Budesonide/formoterol administered once daily was as effective as twice-daily administration (equivalent daily doses) and more effective than once-daily budesonide in adults with moderate persistent asthma. Twice-daily budesonide/formoterol significantly improved PEF compared with budesonide in paediatric patients with asthma.Adjustable maintenance dosing with budesonide/formoterol was associated with significantly less study drug use than fixed dosing with budesonide/formoterol in adults with predominantly mild or moderate persistent asthma. In two of three studies (all longer than 4 months' duration), the risk of exacerbations was significantly lower with adjustable than with fixed dosing, but no difference was detected in four short-term studies. Symptom severity was maintained or improved in most patients receiving either treatment regimen.In adults with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma, adjustable maintenance dosing with budesonide/formoterol reduced the rate of exacerbations and reliever medication use compared with fixed dosing with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate. Budesonide/formoterol was well tolerated in both fixed and adjustable dosing regimens. In conclusion, in patients with persistent asthma symptoms despite treatment with inhaled corticosteroids, budesonide/formoterol administered via a single dry powder Turbuhaler device is an effective, well tolerated, convenient treatment option, which may have the potential for improved compliance. It appears to be as effective as treatment with budesonide and formoterol administered via separate inhalers and is more effective than budesonide monotherapy in improving PEF, controlling symptoms and preventing mild exacerbations. Adjustable maintenance dosing with budesonide/formoterol is associated with a lower overall dosage and appears to maintain control as effectively as fixed dosing.     

Pharmacokinetics of budesonide and formoterol administered via 1 pressurized metered-dose inhaler in patients with asthma and COPD

In 3 open-label studies, the systemic bioavailability of budesonide and formoterol administered via pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) or dry powder inhaler (DPI) formulations was evaluated in asthma (24 children, 55 adults) or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; n = 26) patients. Treatments were administered at doses high enough to estimate pharmacokinetic parameters reliably. Two of the studies included an experimental budesonide pMDI formulation. In study 1 (asthma, adults), budesonide area under the curve (AUC) was 32% and 31% lower and maximal budesonide concentration (C(max)) 45% and 56% lower after budesonide/formoterol pMDI and budesonide pMDI versus budesonide DPI. Formoterol AUC and C(max) were 13% and 39% lower after budesonide/formoterol pMDI versus formoterol DPI. In study 2 (asthma, children), budesonide AUC and C(max) were 27% and 41% lower after budesonide/formoterol pMDI versus budesonide DPI + formoterol DPI. In study 3 (COPD/asthma, adults), budesonide AUC and C(max) were similar and formoterol AUC and C(max) 18% and 22% greater after budesonide/formoterol pMDI versus budesonide pMDI + formoterol DPI (COPD). Budesonide and formoterol AUC were 12% and 15% higher in COPD versus asthma patients. In conclusion, systemic exposure generally is similar or lower with budesonide/formoterol pMDI versus combination therapy via separate DPIs or monotherapy and comparable between asthma and COPD patients.     

Efficacy and safety of budesonide and formoterol in one pressurized metered-dose inhaler in patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results of a 6-month randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: The combination of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and a long-acting bronchodilator is recommended in the treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who have frequent exacerbations. Budesonide/formoterol dry powder inhaler (DPI) has demonstrated efficacy and tolerability in patients with COPD. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of budesonide/formoterol administered via one hydrofluoroalkane pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) in patients with COPD. METHODS: This was a 6-month, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre study (NCT00206154) of 1704 patients aged >/=40 years with moderate to very severe COPD conducted in 194 centres in the US, Czech Republic, the Netherlands, Poland and South Africa. After 2 weeks of treatment based on previous therapy (ICSs and short-acting bronchodilators allowed during the run-in period), patients received one of the following treatments administered twice daily: budesonide/formoterol pMDI 160/4.5 microg x two inhalations (320/9 microg); budesonide/formoterol pMDI 80/4.5 microg x two inhalations (160/9 microg); budesonide pMDI 160 microg x two inhalations (320 microg) plus formoterol DPI 4.5 microg x two inhalations (9 microg); budesonide pMDI 160 microg x two inhalations (320 microg); formoterol DPI 4.5 microg x two inhalations (9 microg); or placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The co-primary efficacy variables were pre-dose forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) and 1-hour post-dose FEV(1). RESULTS: Budesonide/formoterol 320/9 microg demonstrated significantly greater improvements in pre-dose FEV(1) versus formoterol (p = 0.026; pre-specified primary comparator) and 1-hour post-dose FEV(1) versus budesonide (p < 0.001; pre-specified primary comparator); budesonide/formoterol 160/9 microg demonstrated significantly greater improvements versus budesonide (p < 0.001) for 1-hour post-dose FEV(1) but not versus formoterol for pre-dose FEV(1). Dyspnoea (measured using the Breathlessness Diary) and health-related quality-of-life (HR-QOL) scores (based on the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire total score) were significantly improved with both dosage strengths of budesonide/formoterol compared with budesonide, formoterol and placebo (p 相似文献   

Budesonide/Formoterol pressurized metered-dose inhaler

*The corticosteroid budesonide and the long-acting [beta]2-adrenoceptor agonist formoterol have been combined into a single pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) for use in patients aged > or =12 years with asthma. *In well designed 12-week clinical trials in patients with mild to moderate or moderate to severe persistent asthma, lung function improved to a significantly greater extent with twice-daily budesonide/formoterol pMDI 160 [micro]g/9 [micro]g or 320 [micro]g/9 [micro]g than with placebo or the same nominal dosage of either of the components alone. *Budesonide/formoterol pMDI was also associated with improvements from baseline in patient-reported asthma control, asthma symptom and asthma-related quality of life outcomes that were significantly greater than those with placebo and, for many endpoints, monotherapy with the individual components. *In a 52-week safety study, treatment with twice-daily budesonide/formoterol pMDI 320 [micro]g/9 [micro]g was associated with rapid and durable improvements in lung function and asthma control that were significantly greater than those with twice-daily budesonide pMDI 640 [micro]g monotherapy. *Budesonide/formoterol pMDI was well tolerated in clinical trials. Its overall adverse event profile is consistent with the known tolerability profiles of long-acting [beta]2-adrenoceptor agonist and inhaled corticosteroid therapy, and is similar to that shown with placebo.     

Clinical comparability between the CFC and HFA budesonide pressurised metered-dose inhalers in paediatric patients with asthma: a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a novel hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) pressurised metered dose inhaler (pMDI) formulation of budesonide (Pulmicort) versus the conventional chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) pMDI formulation in paediatric patients with asthma. METHODS: This was a Phase III, multicentre, 12-week, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group study involving children (6-12 years of age) with mild to moderate asthma. Patients received either budesonide HFA pMDI or budesonide CFC pMDI 200 mug twice daily, with or without a spacer (NebuChamber/Nebunette). Primary efficacy endpoint: mean percentage change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) from baseline to week 12. Secondary efficacy endpoints included changes in FEV(1) per cent of predicted normal, forced vital capacity, morning and evening peak expiratory flow rate, asthma symptoms and use of rescue medication. RESULTS: A total of 159 patients received treatment (HFA 77, CFC 82). For mean percentage change in FEV(1) from baseline to week 12, the difference between the treatments (CFC pMDI - HFA pMDI) was -3.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] -8.0% to 1.8%) for the full analysis set and was not affected by spacer use. The upper CI was < 10% (the predefined non-inferiority margin), so non-inferiority was demonstrated. Improvements in the secondary efficacy endpoints with both budesonide formulations were not significantly different. In both groups there were similar numbers of adverse events and no evidence of oral candidiasis at week 12. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with budesonide HFA pMDI is effective and well tolerated in children with asthma and is clinically comparable to budesonide CFC pMDI.     

Clinical comparability between the CFC and HFA budesonide pressurised metered-dose inhalers in paediatric patients with asthma: a randomised controlled trial

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a novel hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) pressurised metered dose inhaler (pMDI) formulation of budesonide (Pulmicort) versus the conventional chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) pMDI formulation in paediatric patients with asthma.

Methods: This was a Phase III, multicentre, 12‐week, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group study involving children (6–12 years of age) with mild to moderate asthma. Patients received either budesonide HFA pMDI or budesonide CFC pMDI 200?µg twice daily, with or without a spacer (NebuChamber/Nebunette*). Primary efficacy endpoint: mean percentage change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) from baseline to week 12. Secondary efficacy endpoints included changes in FEV₁ per cent of predicted normal, forced vital capacity, morning and evening peak expiratory flow rate, asthma symptoms and use of rescue medication.

Results: A total of 159 patients received treatment (HFA 77, CFC 82). For mean percentage change in FEV₁ from baseline to week 12, the difference between the treatments (CFC pMDI – HFA pMDI) was –3.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] –8.0% to 1.8%) for the full analysis set and was not affected by spacer use. The upper CI was < 10% (the predefined non-inferiority margin), so non-inferiority was demonstrated. Improvements in the secondary efficacy endpoints with both budesonide formulations were not significantly different. In both groups there were similar numbers of adverse events and no evidence of oral candidiasis at week 12.

Conclusions: Treatment with budesonide HFA pMDI is effective and well tolerated in children with asthma and is clinically comparable to budesonide CFC pMDI.     

The effect of budesonide and formoterol in one pressurized metered-dose inhaler on patient-reported outcomes in adults with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma

ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the effects of budesonide and formoterol administered via one pressurized metered-dose inhaler (budesonide/formoterol pMDI) on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and to determine the contributions of budesonide and formoterol to those effects in adults with asthma.

Research design and methods: A 12-week, random­ized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, multicenter study was conducted in 480 patients aged ≥?12 years with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma. After a 2-week run-in period during which current asthma therapy was discontinued, patients were randomized to receive two inhalations twice daily of budesonide/formo­terol pMDI 80/4.5?μg (160/9?μg), budesonide pMDI 80?μg (160?μg), formoterol via dry powder inhaler (DPI) 4.5?μg (9?μg), or placebo.

Main outcome measures: Analyses included a subpopulation of 405 patients aged ≥?18 years. PROs included the standardized Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ(S)), the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale, the Patient Satisfaction with Asthma Medication (PSAM) questionnaire, and asthma control variables (recorded via electronic diaries), such as asthma symptoms, rescue medication use, and nighttime awakenings due to asthma. Patient and physician global assessments were collected at the end of the study.

Results: Patients aged ≥?18 years receiving budesonide/formoterol pMDI reported significantly greater improvements from baseline in AQLQ overall and domain scores, MOS Sleep Scale domain scores, and asthma control variables than patients receiving placebo (?p ≤ 0.033). Improvements from baseline in AQLQ(S) overall and domain scores, daily asthma symptoms scores, percentage of symptom-free days, percentage of rescue medication-free days, and percentage of asthma control days were significantly greater in patients receiving budesonide/formoterol pMDI versus formoterol DPI (?p ≤ 0.042). Patients receiving budesonide/formoterol pMDI reported significantly greater PSAM scores than did patients in all other treatment arms (?p ≤ 0.004). Study limitations may include the fact that the formoterol-alone arm used a different device and formulation than the other active arms as well as the absence of a treatment arm with budesonide and formoterol administered concomit­antly in separate inhalers. In addition, these results may not be generalized to all patients with asthma, as this analysis included only patients aged ≥?18 years.

Conclusions: Patients receiving treatment with budesonide/for­moterol pMDI experienced significantly greater improvements from baseline in asthma-related quality of life, quality of sleep, and asthma control and greater satisfaction with treatment than patients receiving placebo. The combination of budesonide and formoterol in one pMDI is beneficial in improving how a patient feels and functions as a result of treatment.     

Pharmacokinetics of budesonide and formoterol administered via a series of single-drug and combination inhalers: four open-label, randomized, crossover studies in healthy adults

Objective: To investigate the pharmacokinetics of budesonide and formoterol administered concomitantly in healthy adults. Methods: Three single-dose, open-label crossover studies (n=28 each) were conducted (Study I: budesonide pMDI, formoterol DPI, budesonide pMDI+formoterol DPI; Study II: budesonide/formoterol pMDI, budesonide pMDI+formoterol DPI; Study III: budesonide/formoterol pMDI [three budesonide formulation strengths; constant formoterol]). Study IV (n=28) assessed steady state pharmacokinetics (budesonide/formoterol pMDI [two/four inhalations twice daily, 5-day treatment; four inhalations, single-dose]). Results: Study I: no pharmacokinetic interactions were observed between budesonide and formoterol. Study II: AUC ratios were 97.9% (budesonide) and 82.2% (formoterol) (budesonide/formoterol pMDI versus budesonide pMDI+formoterol DPI). Study III: formoterol AUC was comparable across budesonide/formoterol pMDI formulation strengths; budesonide AUC increased with formulation strength in proportion to fine particle dose. Study IV: dose proportionality was demonstrated for budesonide (AUC ratio, 104.3%) and suggested for formoterol (AUC ratio, 117.6%) with budesonide/formoterol pMDI (steady state); budesonide and formoterol AUC was higher with repeated versus single-dose budesonide/formoterol pMDI (four inhalations). Conclusions: No pharmacokinetic interactions were observed between budesonide and formoterol. Budesonide dose variation in budesonide/formoterol pMDI did not affect formoterol exposure. Steady state budesonide/formoterol pMDI dose-doubling yielded proportional increases in budesonide and formoterol exposure. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

The effect of adjustable dosing with budesonide/formoterol on health-related quality of life and asthma control compared with fixed dosing

BACKGROUND: Budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler is an effective therapy for asthma. We investigated whether adjustable maintenance dosing with budesonide/formoterol could maintain health-related quality of life (HRQL) and asthma control. PATIENTS/METHODS: Asthma patients (n = 4025) received budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort 160/4.5 microg) 2 inhalations twice daily (b.i.d.) for 4 weeks during run-in of this open, multicentre study. Patients were randomised to adjustable dosing (budesonide/formoterol 1 inhalation b.i.d.; stepping up to 2 or 4 inhalations bid for 1 week if asthma worsened) or fixed dosing (budesonide/formoterol 2 inhalations b.i.d.), for 12 weeks. Change in HRQL (standardised Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, AQLQ[S], score) during randomised treatment was the primary efficacy variable. Secondary variables included asthma control (peak expiratory flow [PEF], symptom-severity score, nocturnal awakenings, reliever-medication use) and study-medication intake. RESULTS: Clinically significant (> or = 0.5) improvements in AQLQ(S) score (mean 0.73), morning and evening PEF (mean 42.5 and 24.8 L/min, respectively), and symptom-severity score (mean 0.36) were achieved during run-in. The improvements were maintained in both groups although, overall, adjustable-dosing patients took fewer daily inhalations of budesonide/formoterol than fixed-dosing patients (mean 2.63 versus 3.82, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Adjustable maintenance dosing with budesonide/formoterol maintains HRQL and asthma control as effectively as fixed dosing and is associated with a reduced drug load overall.     

Budesonide/formoterol: in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Budesonide/formoterol is a fixed-dose combination of the corticosteroid budesonide and the long-acting beta2-agonist formoterol, and is inhaled via the Turbuhaler device. In two large, randomised, double-blind, 12-month studies, patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) receiving budesonide/formoterol 320/9 microg twice daily had a significantly higher forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and significantly higher morning and evening peak expiratory flow at trial endpoint than recipients of budesonide or placebo; FEV1 was significantly higher than with formoterol in the larger study. In both studies, the rate of COPD exacerbations and exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids was significantly reduced with budesonide/formoterol versus formoterol and placebo. Moreover, the time to first exacerbation was significantly prolonged with budesonide/formoterol versus all other treatment arms in the larger study. At 12 months, significant improvements in health-related quality-of-life scores were seen with budesonide/formoterol versus placebo in both studies. The reduction in total and individual symptom scores was significantly greater with budesonide/formoterol than with budesonide or placebo in the smaller study. Budesonide/formoterol was generally well tolerated by patients with severe COPD. The tolerability profile of the combination was similar to that of the individual components with no increase in the incidence of adverse events.     

Budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy: a new treatment approach for adult patients with asthma

ABSTRACT

Background: An inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) or an ICS/long-acting β₂-agonist (LABA) combination plus short-acting β₂-agonist (SABA) as needed for symptom relief is recommended for persistent asthma. Additionally, budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy (Symbicort SMART, AstraZeneca, Sweden) has been approved for adults in the European Union. This option is well tolerated and offers greater reductions in asthma exacerbations together with similar improvements in daily symptom control, at a lower overall steroid load, compared with fixed-dose ICS/LABA plus SABA.

Scope: Two large clinical trials investigated the use of budesonide/formoterol as maintenance and reliever compared with medium or high doses of an ICS/LABA combination as controller plus SABA as reliever in adults (aged ≥ 12 years). COMPASS was a 6-month, double blind, randomized trial while COSMOS was a 1?year, dose titration study which reflected routine clinical practice. The current review focuses on the findings in both studies, among adult patients only (aged ≥ 18 years).

Findings: Among adults, the studies confirmed a 21–39% reduction in severe exacerbations in patients treated with budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy compared with titrated salmeterol/fluticasone plus SABA (COSMOS) or fixed higher budesonide/formoterol or salmeterol/fluticasone plus SABA (COMPASS), respectively. Similar levels of daily asthma control were achieved with budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy at a significantly lower overall steroid load compared with salmeterol/fluticasone or budesonide/formoterol plus SABA. Budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy was as well tolerated as combination therapies.

Conclusions: In adult patients, budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy is a safe and simplified approach to asthma management, using a single inhaler, which reduces severe exacerbations and maintains similar daily asthma control at a lower drug load compared with the traditional strategy of ICS/LABA plus SABA.     

Economic assessment of adjustable maintenance treatment with budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler versus fixed treatment in asthma

OBJECTIVES: To compare the costs and effectiveness of adjustable maintenance dosing with budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler versus fixed dosing in adults with asthma. METHODS: In this prospective, randomised, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre trial conducted in Germany, patients with asthma received budesonide/formoterol 160 microg/4.5 microg in a single inhaler (Symbicort Turbuhaler with two inhalations twice daily for a 4-week run-in period. Patients were then randomised to either adjustable maintenance dosing (one inhalation twice daily, stepping up to four inhalations twice daily for 1 week if asthma worsened; n=1679) or fixed dosing (two inhalations twice daily; n=1618) for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the change in health-related quality of life (HR-QOL), measured using the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (standardised) during the randomised treatment period. Resource utilisation data were collected in parallel and combined with German unit costs to estimate direct and indirect costs (year 2001 values). RESULTS: Both treatment regimens were equally effective in maintaining HR-QOL and asthma control during the randomised treatment period. However, overall, patients in the adjustable maintenance dosing group took fewer daily inhalations of budesonide/formoterol than those in the fixed-dosing group (mean: 2.63 vs 3.82 inhalations; p<0.001). Adjustable maintenance dosing was associated with significantly lower asthma-related direct costs compared with fixed dosing (mean: 221 euro vs 292 euro; p<0.001). This pattern was maintained when patients were stratified into those with peak expiratory flow (PEF) of 60% to <80% predicted normal and those with PEF of>/=80% predicted normal and when total costs were considered. CONCLUSION: Adjustable maintenance dosing with budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler maintained HR-QOL in adult patients with asthma at a significantly lower cost than fixed dosing.     

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of an extrafine fixed pMDI combination of beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate in adolescent asthma

Aim

The aim was to investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of an extrafine pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) fixed combination of beclometasone dipropionate (BDP)/formoterol fumarate (FF) in adolescent and adult asthma.

Methods

This was a three-way crossover study, on 30 asthmatic adolescents receiving BDP/FF pMDI with or without a valved holding chamber (VHC) or a free licenced combination of BDP pMDI and FF pMDI plus a parallel arm of 30 asthmatic adults receiving BDP/FF pMDI. All patients received a single dose of BDP and FF of 400 µg and 24 µg, for each treatment, respectively. Assessments were performed over 8 hours.

Results

In adolescents, the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the systemic exposure (AUC(0,t)) geometric mean ratio of the fixed combination with or without VHC vs. the free combination were within the bioequivalence range 0.80–1.25, both for beclometasone-17-monopropionate (B17MP, the active metabolite of BDP) and formoterol. Pharmacodynamic variables for plasma potassium and glucose, pulse rate and pulmonary function in adolescents were equivalent between treatments, 95% CI within 0.9, 1.09. The upper level of 90% CIs for AUC(0,t) geometric mean ratio adolescents : adults of B17MP and formoterol after treatment with BDP/FF pMDI was lower than 1.25, 90% CI 0.78, 1.04 and 0.86, 1.17, respectively.

Conclusions

In adolescents the pharmacodynamics and the overall systemic exposure to the active ingredients of an extrafine fixed combination of BDP/FF pMDI with or without a VHC was equivalent to that of a free licenced combination of pMDIs of established safety and efficacy profiles. The systemic exposure in adolescents was not higher than in adults. These results support the indication for use of inhaled corticosteroid/long acting β₂-adrenoceptor agonist pMDIs in adolescents at the same dosage as in adults.     

Inhaled budesonide/formoterol combination

Current evidence suggests that the addition of the long acting inhaled beta2-agonist formoterol to low or moderate doses of the inhaled corticosteroid budesonide is effective in improving lung function and reducing the incidence of asthma exacerbations. Concurrent use of budesonide with formoterol does not result in any untoward interaction that affects the pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic profiles of the individual drugs, or their adverse effect profiles. The administration of combined budesonide/formoterol is effective in improving morning and evening peak expiratory flow rates in adults with persistent asthma. Control of asthma symptoms is also significantly improved. In children aged 4 to 17 years, combined budesonide/formoterol is effective in increasing both morning and evening peak expiratory flow rates and significantly improving forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). The most commonly encountered adverse effects in clinical trials with combination budesonide/formoterol therapy have been respiratory infection, pharyngitis and coughing. No adverse effects on pulse rate, blood pressure or serum potassium have been reported with combination therapy.     

Inhaled mometasone furoate: a review of its use in adults and adolescents with persistent asthma

Mometasone furoate is a corticosteroid with relatively high in vitro potency. Recent randomised, double-blind, multicentre trials have assessed the efficacy of mometasone furoate delivered by dry powder inhaler over 12 weeks in adults and adolescents with mild to severe persistent asthma. Mometasone furoate 200 microg twice daily or 400 microg once daily in the morning or 200 microg once daily in the evening improved lung function, asthma symptom scores and use of rescue medication to a significantly greater extent than placebo in patients who had previously received only short-acting inhaled beta2-adrenoceptor agonists alone as treatment in 3 trials (n = 195 to 306). In studies in 227 to 733 patients with mild to moderate asthma who were receiving ongoing treatment with inhaled corticosteroids prior to enrolment, mometasone furoate 100 to 400 microg twice daily was consistently better at improving the above indicators of asthma than placebo. Mometasone furoate 100 to 200 microg twice daily was as effective as beclomethasone dipropionate 200 microg twice daily or budesonide 400 microg twice daily and mometasone furoate 200 microg twice daily was as effective as fluticasone propionate 250 microg twice daily. Mometasone furoate 400 or 800 microg twice daily was also consistently more effective than placebo in reducing oral corticosteroid dosages and improving lung function and asthma symptoms in 132 patients with oral corticosteroid-dependent asthma. Once daily administration of mometasone furoate 400 microg appears to be as effective at improving indicators of asthma as twice daily administration of 200 microg. Patients receiving mometasone furoate < or =800 microg/day and recipients of placebo experienced a similar overall incidence of adverse events considered to be related to treatment. The most common of these events were oral candidiasis, headache, pharyngitis and dysphonia. Mometasone furoate 100 to 400 microg twice daily, beclomethasone dipropionate 200 microg twice daily, budesonide 400 microg twice daily or fluticasone propionate 250 microg twice daily were similarly tolerated. CONCLUSION: Inhaled mometasone furoate is well tolerated, with minimal systemic activity and is equally effective when administered as a divided dose or as a single daily dose. Use of the drug can result in a decrease in requirements for oral corticosteroids in patients with oral corticosteroid-dependent asthma and is as effective as other inhaled corticosteroids currently used in the treatment of mild to moderate persistent asthma. Thus mometasone furoate is suitable for the control of mild to severe persistent asthma in adults or adolescents.     

Budesonide administered using chlorofluorocarbon and hydrofluoroalkane pressurized metered-dose inhalers: pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and clinical equivalence

OBJECTIVE: The traditional chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellants used in pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) have unacceptable environmental effects and are being replaced by alternatives such as hydrofluoroalkanes (HFAs). However, there is a need to ensure that pMDIs with these novel propellants are as effective and safe as their older counterparts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-dose pharmacokinetic and multiple high-dose Phase I studies in healthy volunteers and randomized, controlled 12-week Phase III clinical trials in children, adolescents and adults with mild-to-moderate asthma have been performed to compare the efficacy and safety of HFA-based budesonide inhaler therapy with the traditional CFC-based pMDI. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic study in 40 persons showed comparable characteristics of CFC and HFApMDIs, with good dose-proportionality, at doses of 400, 800 and 1,600 microg. The high-dosage (1,600 microg/day) study in 48 subjects showed both inhaler types to be similar in terms of effects on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function over 4 weeks. The pediatric clinical study involved 159 children and showed noninferiority of the HFA pMDI in terms of 12-week change in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec, other spirometric parameters and symptomatic measures. The adolescent/adult study in 321 subjects also showed similarity between the two formulations, in terms of 12-week primary endpoint (changes in morning peak expiratory flow rates) and other lung function and symptom measures. Both formulations were well-tolerated, with no safety issues being identified for the novel HFA inhaler in any study. CONCLUSION: Budesonide HFA pMDI is pharmacokinetically and clinically comparable to the traditional CFC-based inhaler, with similar safety profile.     

The effect of adjustable dosing with budesonide/formoterol on health-related quality of life and asthma control compared with fixed dosing

SUMMARY

Background: Budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler is an effective therapy for asthma. We investigated whether adjustable maintenance dosing with budesonide/formoterol could maintain health-related quality of life (HRQL) and asthma control.

Patients/methods: Asthma patients (n = 4025) received budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort* 160/4.5?µg) 2 inhalations twice daily (bid) for 4?weeks during run-in of this open, multicentre study. Patients were randomised to adjustable dosing (budesonide/formoterol 1 inhalation bid; stepping up to 2 or 4 inhalations bid for 1?week if asthma worsened) or fixed dosing (budesonide/formoterol 2 inhalations bid), for 12?weeks. Change in HRQL (standardised Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, AQLQ[S], score) during randomised treatment was the primary efficacy variable. Secondary variables included asthma control (peak expiratory flow [PEF], symptom-severity score, nocturnal awakenings, reliever-medication use) and study-medication intake.

Results: Clinically significant (≥ 0.5) improvements in AQLQ(S) score (mean 0.73), morning and evening PEF (mean 42.5 and 24.8?L/min, respectively), and symptom-severity score (mean 0.36) were achieved during run-in. The improvements were maintained in both groups although, overall, adjustable-dosing patients took fewer daily inhalations of budesonide/formoterol than fixed-dosing patients (mean 2.63 versus 3.82, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Adjustable maintenance dosing with budesonide/formoterol maintains HRQL and asthma control as effectively as fixed dosing and is associated with a reduced drug load overall.