Evaluation of the novel Helicobacter pylori ClariRes real-time PCR assay for detection and clarithromycin susceptibility testing of H. pylori in stool specimens from symptomatic children

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the Helicobacter pylori ClariRes assay (Ingenetix, Vienna, Austria) for the detection of H. pylori infection and the simultaneous clarithromycin susceptibility testing of the H. pylori isolates in stool samples from 100 symptomatic children. The results obtained by this novel biprobe real-time PCR method were directly compared with the results obtained from histological examination of gastric biopsy specimens, culturing, the [13C]urea breath test, and a monoclonal antibody-based stool antigen enzyme immunoassay (EIA). Fecal specimens from all 54 children who were shown to be noninfected by "gold standard" tests gave true-negative PCR results (specificity, 100%). Of the remaining 46 individuals with a positive H. pylori status, 29 were found to be positive by real-time PCR (sensitivity, 63%). For these 29 cases, the H. pylori ClariRes assay confirmed all results from phenotypic clarithromycin susceptibility testing by Etest. In summary, this investigation demonstrates that detection of Helicobacter DNA in stool samples by real-time PCR is a difficult task and that this method cannot replace the stool antigen EIA (sensitivity, 95.7%) for the accurate diagnosis of H. pylori infection in children.     

Evaluation of a novel rapid one-step monoclonal chromatographic immunoassay for detection of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Helicobacter pylori</Emphasis> in stool from children

A new rapid office-based one-step monoclonal immunoassay (RAPID Hp StAR, DakoCytomation, Cambridge, UK) for detection of Helicobacter pylori antigen in stool was evaluated in children against invasive diagnostic methods and compared to the results of a monoclonal EIA targeting the same antigen (Amplified IDEIA Hp StAR, DakoCytomation, Cambridge, UK). Coded stool samples from 118 symptomatic children (0.3–18.8 years) were investigated prior to any anti-H. pylori therapy. Fifty-four children were H. pylori infected defined by positive culture and/or two other positive tests (¹³C- urea breath test, histology, rapid urea test), the remaining 64 children showed concordant negative results. Thirty-four infected children (4.8–17.8 years) were monitored with ¹³C- urea breath test (five remained positive) and stool test 6–8 weeks after anti-H. pylori therapy. The immunoassays were independently read by two investigators. The monoclonal EIA showed excellent sensitivity and specificity before (98% and 100%, respectively) and after therapy (100%; 96.2%). The rapid immunoassay was invalid for technical reasons in nine samples (5.9%). The two observers agreed in 31 positive and 93 negative results, but had discordant results in 17 samples (11.2%). Overall, the rapid test showed a poor sensitivity (63.8%–71.1%), but a good specificity (91.1%–96.2%) before treatment. We conclude that the new office based monoclonal enzyme immunoassay for diagnosis of H. pylori should be modified to improve sensitivity, inter-observer-variability and some technical problems. In contrast, the monoclonal EIA stool test is highly reliable, both pre- and post therapy, and equivalent to the ¹³C- urea breath test.     

Evaluation of [13C]urea breath test and Helicobacter pylori stool antigen test for diagnosis of H. pylori infection in children from a developing country

The [(13)C]urea breath test ((13)C-UBT) and Helicobacter pylori stool antigen test (HpSA) for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection in children were validated. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 93.8, 99.1, 97.8, and 98.0%, respectively, for the (13)C-UBT and 96.9, 100, 100, and 98.0%, respectively, for HpSA. Both tests are appropriate for diagnosing H. pylori infection in children.     

Two enzyme immunoassays and PCR for detection of Helicobacter pylori in stool specimens from pediatric patients before and after eradication therapy

This study of pediatric patients was intended to determine the suitability of stool PCR and two antigen enzyme immunoassays (EIAs; Premier Platinum HpSA and the novel FemtoLab H. pylori), which detect Helicobacter pylori antigens in feces, as pretreatment diagnostic tools and especially as posttreatment control. Forty-nine H. pylori-infected children with dyspepsia received eradication therapy. Successful treatment was determined by a negative [(13)C]urea breath test 4 and 12 weeks after discontinuation of therapy. Fecal specimens were collected prior to eradication therapy as well as 4 weeks after the end of treatment. Successfully treated children delivered stool samples at 6, 8, and 12 weeks posttreatment also. Specimens were examined by seminested PCR and Premier Platinum HpSA and were reexamined by both EIAs as soon as FemtoLab H. pylori was available. In the first test series, the overall sensitivities of PCR and Premier Platinum HpSA were 93.0 and 91.1%, respectively. With specimens collected at 4 weeks after treatment, the respective specificities were 68.8 and 79.3%. After longer follow-up periods, however, they gradually increased to 100 and 96.9%, respectively. In the new test series, Premier Platinum HpSA delivered a considerably lower number of false-positive results (4 versus 18), indicating intertest variations. The overall test sensitivity was 94.6%, and the overall specificity was 97.5%. FemtoLab H. pylori showed an excellent performance with an overall sensitivity and specificity of 98.2 and 98.1%, respectively. Thus, in contrast to PCR, both EIAs were shown to be suitable for early posttreatment control.     

Posttreatment follow-up of Helicobacter pylori infection using a stool antigen immunoassay.

The Helicobacter pylori stool antigen enzyme immunoassay (HpSA) was evaluated during posttreatment follow-up of patients in a country with a very high prevalence of H. pylori infection. From among 273 dyspeptic individuals (18 to 55 years) initially recruited from a shantytown in Lima, Peru, 238 participants who met the inclusion criteria and were suspected to be H. pylori positive based on (14)C urea breath test (UBT) results underwent endoscopy. Participants with endoscopy-proven infections received standard eradication therapy and were monitored by UBT and HpSA at 1 month following treatment and at 3-month intervals for 9 months posttreatment. A second endoscopy was performed if UBT results showed evidence of treatment failure or H. pylori recurrence. Biopsy results were considered the "gold standard" in all analyses. Among patients who underwent endoscopy, HpSA had a pretreatment sensitivity of 93%. Two-hundred thirty patients completed the treatment regimen, of whom 201 (93%) were considered to have had successful treatment outcomes based on a negative follow-up UBT. Thirty-two patients with UBT-defined treatment failures or H. pylori recurrences at any point during the 9-month follow-up underwent a second endoscopy. In the posttreatment setting, HpSA had an overall sensitivity of 73% and a specificity of 67%. Agreement between UBT and HpSA diminished throughout the follow-up. Among 14 participants in whom HpSA remained positive at 1 month following treatment despite UBT evidence of treatment success, 12 (86%) became HpSA negative within 3 months posttreatment. Although this study confirmed the validity of the HpSA in the initial assessment of dyspeptic patients, the test demonstrated a reduced overall accuracy in the detection of treatment failures and H. pylori recurrences during 9 months of posttreatment follow-up. Furthermore, in some patients it may take up to 3 months after successful eradication for antigen shedding to diminish to levels within the negative HpSA range.     

Evaluation of the Helicobacter pylori stool antigen (HpSA) test in routine clinical practice--is it patient-friendly?

A new immunoassay has been developed to detect the presence of Helicobacter pylori antigens in stool specimens. The aim of our study was to assess the accuracy and utility of the H. pylori stool antigen (HpSA) test in routine clinical practice. Dyspeptic patients undergoing endoscopy were studied. H. pylori status was defined before treatment by CLOtest and histology, and by 13C urea breath test (UBT) after eradication therapy. A standard universal container was provided for stool collection and the HpSA test was performed by an investigator blind to the results of the other diagnostic tests. Patients also provided a venous blood sample prior to endoscopy for H. pylori serology. Sixty patients (30 M : 30 F: mean age 47 yr) were enrolled in the study. The pretreatment sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of the HpSA test were respectively, 93%, 94%, 96%, and 90%. Twenty five patients returned for post treatment 13CUBT, but only 14 (56%) provided a stool sample for analysis. The post treatment sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of the HpSA test were respectively, 67%, 100%, 67%, and 92%. The HpSA test was negative in 19% of the patients found positive for anti-H. pylori antibodies on serology testing. All H. pylori antibody-negative patients had a negative HpSA test. Our results suggest that the HpSA test provides accurate pretreatment diagnosis of H. pylori infection but the reliability of the test after treatment is uncertain. A potential problem with the HpSA test appears to be patient reluctance about stool handling and this could prove a significant obstacle to patient compliance and the acceptability of the test in everyday clinical practice.     

Non-invasive techniques for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection

Helicobacter pylori infection can be diagnosed by invasive techniques requiring endoscopy and biopsy (histologic examination, culture, polymerase chain reaction), and non-invasive techniques (serology, urea breath test, urine or blood, detection of H. pylori antigen in stool specimen). However, recent studies have demonstrated that a strategy of 'testing and treating' for H. pylori in uninvestigated, young (<50 years), dyspeptic patients in primary care is safe and reduces the need for endoscopy. Indeed, a number of clinical guidelines recommend non-invasive testing in dyspeptic patients followed by treatment of H. pylori in primary care based on clinical and economic analyses. Several non-invasive tests are currently available on the market. The choice depends on the clinical circumstances, the likelihood ratio of positive and negative tests, the cost-effectiveness of the testing strategy, and, finally, the availability of the tests. Nevertheless, two non-invasive tests are commonly used: the urea breath test, and the stool antigen test.     

Comparison of three stool antigen tests for Helicobacter pylori detection

BACKGROUND: Active Helicobacter pylori infection can be diagnosed by invasive (biopsy based) or non-invasive methods, such as stool antigen testing. AIMS: To compare three stool antigen enzyme immunoassay kits--Premier Platinum Hp SA, FemtoLab Cnx, and Hp Ag--with biopsy based methods for the detection of H pylori in previously undiagnosed patients. METHODS: One hundred and eleven adults with dyspepsia referred for endoscopy provided a stool sample for testing and had biopsies taken. Patients were considered H pylori positive if two out of three invasive tests were positive or if culture alone was positive. RESULTS: The sensitivities and specificities of the Premier Platinum Hp SA, FemtoLab Cnx, and Hp Ag stool antigen kits when compared with biopsy based diagnosis were, 63.6%, 88.0%, and 56.0% and 92.6%, 97.6%, and 97.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: FemtoLab Cnx may be considered as an alternative to urea breath testing in the initial diagnosis of patients with dyspepsia who do not require immediate endoscopy. Stool testing has the potential advantages of being simple to perform, relatively cheap, and samples can be submitted directly from primary care.     

Detection of Helicobacter pylori in faeces by culture, PCR and enzyme immunoassay.

Various techniques such as culture, PCR and enzyme immunoassay have been used to detect Helicobacter pylori infection in human faecal specimens. Attempts to culture H. pylori have had limited success as the bacterium exists predominantly in a non-culturable (coccoid) form in the faeces. Several PCR protocols, differing from each other in the choice of genomic targets and primers, have been used to detect H. pylori infection. Substances in faeces that inhibit PCR have been removed by various pre-PCR steps such as filtration through a polypropylene membrane, biochemical separation by column chromatography and isolation of H. pylori with immunomagnetic beads, the former two techniques yielding results with a high degree of sensitivity and specificity. An enzyme immunoassay based on the detection of H. pylori antigen in faeces has become a convenient tool for the pre-treatment diagnosis of the infection. The stool antigen assay is convenient, especially for children, as it involves neither surgery nor the discomfort associated with the urea breath test. However, its applicability in monitoring eradication therapy has been controversial, as the assay can detect dead or partially degraded bacteria long after actual eradication, thus giving false positive results.     

Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in adults with intellectual disability

Helicobacter pylori infection is common among adults with intellectual disability. The acceptabilities and accuracies of different diagnostic tests in this population are unknown. We aimed to determine (i) patient acceptability and (ii) performance characteristics of serology, fecal-antigen, and urea breath tests among adults with intellectual disability. One hundred sixty-eight such adults underwent H. pylori testing with serology and fecal-antigen tests, and a portion underwent treatment. One year later, the participants were retested with fecal-antigen, serology, and urea breath tests. The numbers of specimens obtained and difficulties in collection reported by caregivers were noted. Test performance characteristics were assessed among participants and 65 of their caregivers, using serology as the reference. All participants provided at least one specimen, despite reported collection difficulties for 23% of fecal and 27% of blood specimens. Only 25% of the participants provided breath specimens; failure to perform this test was associated with lower intellectual ability and higher maladaptive behavior. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the fecal test (baseline and 12 months versus caregivers) were 70 and 63 versus 81, 93 and 95 versus 98, 96 and 92 versus 93, and 53 and 74 versus 93%, respectively; those of the urea breath test (12 months versus caregivers) were 86 versus 100, 88 versus 95, 75 versus 89, and 94 versus 100%, respectively. With assistance, fecal or blood specimens for H. pylori assessment can be provided by most patients with intellectual disability regardless of their level of function or behavior. Only those with greater ability can perform the urea breath test. Using serology as the reference test, the limitations of performance characteristics of the fecal-antigen and urea breath tests are similar to those among a control group of caregivers.     

Histological identification of Helicobacter pylori: comparison of staining methods

AIM: To determine whether two recently described staining methods (the modified McMullen's and the Helicobacter pylori silver stain HpSS methods) used for the histological identification of H pylori organisms are superior to two established techniques (the modified Giemsa and anti-H pylori antibody immunostain) in terms of availability, reproducibility, rapidity, sensitivity, and cost. METHODS: Histological sections from 63 paired gastric biopsies from adult patients previously investigated for dyspepsia were stained with the four methods and these were assessed blindly and independently by two observers. Of the 63 patients, 30 were originally negative in all tests for H pylori infection, 30 were positive, and the remaining three cases had discordant results using a combination of five tests (rapid biopsy urease test, urea breath test, culture, serology, and histology). RESULTS: Interobserver agreement was best with the antibody method (98%), followed by the McMullen's (90%), Giemsa (87%), and HpSS (85%). Of the 60 "gold standard" positive and negative cases, 30 were positive by the modified Giemsa stain, 29 by the McMullen's method, 29 by HpSS, and 30 by the antibody stain. However, there were two false positives with the HpSS method. The modified Giemsa is the cheapest and easiest to perform technically. CONCLUSIONS: When H pylori are present, careful examination will almost always reveal them, whichever of these stains is used. However, the modified Giemsa stain is the method of choice because it is sensitive, cheap, easy to perform, and reproducible.     

Significance of transiently positive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay results in detection of Helicobacter pylori in stool samples from children

In young children, the significance of stool samples transiently positive for Helicobacter pylori antigen is unknown. As part of a larger prospective study on enteric infections, stool samples were obtained from 323 children at two time points 3 months apart and tested for H. pylori antigen using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test. Seminested PCR for a Helicobacter-specific 16S rRNA gene was performed on all 26 pairs reverting from positive to negative (transient positives), all 4 persistent antigen-positive pairs, and 10 randomly selected persistent antigen-negative pairs. Helicobacter species were amplified from the first stool samples of 15/26 (58%) of the transient positives and 1 (25%) of 4 persistent positives. No Helicobacter species were amplified from the 10 persistent negatives. Among the 15 amplicons from transient-positive stool, H. pylori was sequenced and identified from 12 (80%; 95% confidence interval, 52% to 96%) and other Helicobacter spp. were identified from three (Helicobacter canis, Helicobacter winghamensis, and MIT 99-5504). Four of the 15 remained positive by PCR for the second (antigen-negative) stool sample, including all 3 initially identified as non-H. pylori. Helicobacter bilis was amplified from the second sample of a persistent positive. Two of eight transient positives from whom serum was available had accompanying transient elevations in anti-H. pylori antibodies. Transiently positive stool ELISAs for H. pylori are common and represent H. pylori in the majority of cases where sequences can be obtained. A not-insignificant percentage of antigen-positive stools, however, may represent other Helicobacter species.     

含幽门螺杆菌特异性抗体牛奶清除幽门螺杆菌效果的临床随机试验

目的:比较观察抗幽门螺杆菌抗体牛奶根除幽门螺杆菌的效果。方法:用4 株幽门螺杆菌(1 株为标准菌株,3 株为本地流行菌株)免疫奶牛,制备出抗幽门螺杆菌抗体牛奶。本次试验共筛选148 例患者,C-14 呼气试验阳性的患者为72 例,最后符合入选标准的为39 例,将符合标准的患者随机分为试验组和对照组,分别为21 例和18 例,试验组饮用含特异性幽门螺杆菌抗体的牛奶,对照组饮用普通牛奶,连续饮用2 个月后,观察结果。结果:试验组的21 名对象中,9 人C-14 呼气试验转为阴性,10 人降低。有效清除率达42.86%,而对照组未有清除,两组清除率有统计学意义(P =0.005,P<0.05)。结论:抗幽门螺杆菌抗体牛奶具有多克隆性和很高的效价,能够有效清除胃内幽门螺杆菌。     

Metronidazole-resistant Helicobacter pylori is more prevalent in patients with nonulcer dyspepsia than in peptic ulcer patients in a multiethnic Asian population

The trend of increasing prevalence of antibiotic resistance among Helicobacter pylori strains has been suggested as a cause of the failure of treatment of H. pylori infections. In this study, 120 of 211 antral biopsy specimens from patients with dyspeptic symptoms were found to harbor H. pylori. The isolates from the 120 specimens were tested by the agar dilution method, and 38 (31.7%) were found to be metronidazole resistant. Among the 211 subjects, 81 of 115 (70.4%) patients with peptic ulcer (PU) were infected with H. pylori, whereas 39 of 96 (40.6%) patients with nonulcer dyspepsia (NUD) were infected with H. pylori. Interestingly, significantly more NUD patients than PU patients harbored metronidazole-resistant H. pylori (22 of 39 [56.4%] and 16 of 81 [19.8%], respectively; P < 0.001). A similar pattern was also observed among NUD patients of different ethnicities but not between male and female patients (23 of 78 [29.5%] and 15 of 42 [35.7%], respectively; P = 0.54). In the posttreatment follow-up, five of six patients who had positive urea breath test results, indicating treatment failure, were NUD patients. Of these, four harbored metronidazole-resistant H. pylori strains. This further illustrates the relevance of metronidazole-resistant H. pylori in NUD patients. The significantly higher percentage of metronidazole-resistant H. pylori isolates in NUD patients may be attributed to the protection offered by the mucus layer of the nonulcerated stomach to the bacteria that reside below it, resulting in organism exposure to sublethal concentrations of metronidazole and leading to the induction of metronidazole resistance. The results demonstrate that the H. pylori isolates colonizing NUD patients are more likely to be resistant to metronidazole. It will therefore be useful to reevaluate the use of metronidazole in the treatment of NUD patients infected with H. pylori.     

Rapid diagnosis of rotavirus infections: comparative prospective study of two techniques for antigen detection in stool

The ability of two commercially available diagnosis rapid assays in detecting rotavirus antigen was compared in a prospective study conducted from September 2002 to May 2003. Five hundred and twelve faecal specimens were studied by IDEIA Rotavirus enzyme immunoassay test (EIA) and Diarlex MB immunochromatographic test (ICG). Specimens giving discrepant results were examined by electron microscopy (EM) and clinical data reconsidered. Out of 512 stool specimens, 155 (30.3%) were positive and 332 (64.8%) negative with the two assays. Discrepant results were obtained for 25 (4.88%) specimens (24 children, 1 adult), with EIA giving more positive results. The retrospective examination by EM, possible for fifteen stools on the 25 that gave discrepant results, confirmed the presence of rotavirus in 7/14 stools which were positive only by EIA and in the stool specimen that was found positive only by ICG. The 25 clinical observations re-examination showed the presence of GEA signs in all cases. The statistical analysis shows an excellent concordance between the EIA and the ICG tests (kappa = 0.89, IC(95%) = [0.85-0.93]) in spite of the underestimation of ICG test in comparison with EIA test (P < 0.0001).     

Evaluation of three commercial enzyme immunoassays compared with the 13C urea breath test for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection.

The diagnostic significance of the serological detection of antibodies to Helicobacter pylori has been established by numerous investigators. Reports of the clinical reliabilities of commercial enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kits available for this purpose vary as a result of the different H. pylori antigen sources and reference methods used. The 13C urea breath test (UBT) has been shown to be an extremely accurate and reliable method of detecting H. pylori infection. We used the 13C urea breath test as the confirmatory method for H. pylori status to evaluate three commercially available EIA kits designed to detect immunoglobulin G antibodies to H. pylori. These kits were the HM-CAP EIA kit (Enteric Products, Inc.), the PYLORI STAT EIA kit (BioWhittaker, Inc.), and the G.A.P. kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories/Biomerica, Inc.). The evaluations were performed in a double-blind manner with samples from 473 clinically characterized patients. This group included patients with symptomatic gastrointestinal disorders as well as nonsymptomatic volunteers. The sensitivities of the kits were as follows: HM-CAP, 98.4%; PYLORI STAT, 99.2%; and G.A.P., 100%. The specificities were as follows: HM-CAP, 96.4%; PYLORI STAT, 90.1%; and G.A.P., 26.0%. Although the HM-CAP and PYLORI STAT kits performed comparably, the G.A.P. test yielded significantly more false-positive results and an unacceptably high number of indeterminate results.     

Improved Performance of a Rapid Office-Based Stool Test for Detection of Helicobacter pylori in Children before and after Therapy

A modified version of a rapid office based one-step monoclonal immunoassay for detection of Helicobacter pylori antigen in stool samples from children was evaluated against biopsy specimen-based methods and compared to a monoclonal enzyme immunoassay using the same antigen. Blinded stool samples from 185 children (0.3 to 18.2 years) were investigated at the time of upper endoscopy prior to anti-H. pylori therapy; 62 children were H. pylori infected and 123 noninfected according to predefined reference standards. Samples obtained 6 to 8 weeks after anti-H. pylori therapy were available from 58 children (3.8 to 17.7 years) and were compared to results of the [¹³C]urea breath test (14/58 were positive). The rapid stool tests were performed by two independent readers. Of 243 rapid tests performed, 1 (0.4%) was invalid for technical reasons. Equivocal results (very weak line) were reported 16 times by reader 1 and 27 times by reader 2. When equivocal results were considered positive, the two observers agreed on 76 positive and 160 negative results and disagreed on 7 samples (2.9%). The sensitivity was 90.8% for reader 1 and 85.5% for reader 2, and the specificity was 91.0% and 93.4%, respectively. The monoclonal enzyme immunoassay revealed a sensitivity and specificity of 94.7% and 97.6%, respectively. The modified chromatographic immunoassay is a good alternative in settings or situations when the monoclonal enzyme immunoassay or the [¹³C]urea breath test are not available or feasible. In order to improve sensitivity, very weak lines should be considered positive test results.Several noninvasive methods are available for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection (5, 14). Serological tests are not appropriate, since they cannot distinguish between a present and previous infection and, in addition, they have a low sensitivity in children younger than 12 years of age (6, 13). The [¹³C]urea breath test (UBT) is the preferred noninvasive diagnostic tool and gives excellent performance for both adults and children, but specificity decreases in very young and mentally disabled children who are not able to cooperate with the test procedure (10, 11, 25). So far, tests for detection of H. pylori antigen in stool samples are the only noninvasive diagnostic tools which do not show an age dependence for the diagnostic accuracy (14, 15). This makes stool tests very attractive, particularly for young children and for epidemiological studies. Several tests have been developed, but validation studies showed differences in performance. An enzyme immunoassay (EIA) based on polyclonal antibodies that was developed by the Meridian Company has been validated in several studies, with controversial results (17, 20, 24). Lack of accuracy is obviously related to intertest variability (19). In contrast, EIA based on monoclonal antibodies showed consistently excellent results, with very high sensitivity and specificity in both children and adults (15, 21). A meta-analysis with head-to-head comparison has judged the monoclonal EIA superior to the polyclonal EIA (8).Recently, we reported on the performance of a one-step monoclonal chromatographic immunoassay for detection of H. pylori antigen in stool samples from symptomatic children compared to the results of a well-established monoclonal EIA using the same antigen, namely, the catalase of H. pylori (22). Evaluation against biopsy specimen-based diagnostic methods showed a moderate sensitivity but a good specificity. After publication of the data, the manufacturer modified the tests. The aim of this study was to evaluate this new version of the rapid office-based one-step stool test in symptomatic children against invasive diagnostic methods and to compare the results with those of the monoclonal EIA.     

Five-year follow-up study of mother-to-child transmission of Helicobacter pylori infection detected by a random amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprinting method

Recent studies have speculated on the possible role of the mother in transmitting Helicobacter pylori infection to their children. In an attempt to either prove or disprove this supposition, we investigated the rates of infection of children born to H. pylori-positive mothers from birth to 5 years of age using serology and the stool antigen test. When infection of the children did occur, the strains from the children were compared to those of their mothers using DNA analysis. Sixty-nine of the 350 pregnant mothers (19.7%) had a positive serology for H. pylori. Fifty-one children underwent serological examinations and stool antigen tests at 4 to 6 days after birth, followed by 1, 3, and 6 months. They were continuously given the stool antigen test at 4- to 6-month intervals until the age of 5 years. Gastric juice samples were collected from the infected children and their mothers for culture and DNA analyses using a random amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprinting method. None of the 51 children acquired H. pylori infection during the first year of life. Of the 44 children enrolled in a 5-year follow-up study, five (11%) acquired H. pylori infection. They acquired the infection at the age of 1 year 2 months, 1 year 3 months, 1 year 6 months, 1 year 8 months, and 4 years 4 months. Random amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprinting confirmed that the strains of the five children exhibited DNA fingerprinting patterns identical to those of their mothers. These findings suggest that mother-to-child transmission is the most probable cause of intrafamilial spread of H. pylori.     

A strain-specific antigen in Japanese Helicobacter pylori recognized in sera of Japanese children

An enzyme immuno assay (EIA) test based on Japanese strain-derived high-molecular-weight cell-associated proteins (JHM-CAP) was evaluated by comparing with a previously developed EIA test based on a U.S. strain-derived high-molecular-weight cell-associated proteins (HM-CAP). Serum samples of 131 Japanese asymptomatic children (mean age, 5.5 years; range, 0 to 21 years) were tested that include 43 positive and 88 negative children as judged by Helicobacter pylori stool antigen test (HpSA test). Both tests showed comparable and reliable specificities, but the sensitivity of JHM-CAP EIA, at 93.0%, was much higher than that of HM-CAP EIA, at 67.4%. More false-negative results of HM-CAP were obtained in children under 10 years of age. Immunoblot analysis revealed that the JHM-CAP but not the HM-CAP preparation had a 100-kDa antigen recognized by JHM-CAP positive sera. It was concluded that JHM-CAP EIA is highly accurate for the serodiagnosis of H. pylori infection in Japanese young children and that the high sensitivity of JHM-CAP EIA in contrast to HM-CAP EIA is due to the presence of a 100-kDa antigen in Japanese strains that may be recognized by the host immune system at an early stage of infection.     

Validation of the string test for the recovery of Helicobacter pylori from gastric secretions and correlation of its results with urea breath test results, serology, and gastric pH levels

The efficacy of the string culture test to isolate Helicobacter pylori from gastric secretions of 28 volunteers was studied. With the urea breath test (UBT) as the "gold standard," the string culture test showed a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 100%. The results of string culture did not correlate with the UBT results, with serum antibody levels, or with the pH levels of gastric secretions.