A treatment planning comparison of intensity modulated photon and proton therapy for paraspinal sarcomas

PURPOSE: A comparative treatment planning study has been undertaken between intensity modulated (IM) photon therapy and IM proton therapy (IMPT) in paraspinal sarcomas, so as to assess the potential benefits and limitations of these treatment modalities. In the case of IM proton therapy, plans were compared also for two different sizes of the pencil beam. Finally, a 10% and 20% dose escalation with IM protons was planned, and the consequential organ at risk (OAR) irradiation was evaluated. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Plans for 5 patients were computed for IM photons (7 coplanar fields) and protons (3 coplanar beams), using the KonRad inverse treatment planning system (developed at the German Cancer Research Center). IMPT planning was performed assuming 2 different sizes of the pencil beam: IMPT with a beam of full width at half-maximum of 20 mm, and IMPT with a "mini-beam" (IMPT(M), full width at half-maximum = 12 mm). Prescribed dose was 77.4 Gy or cobalt Gray equivalent (CGE) for protons to the gross tumor volume (GTV). Surface and center spinal cord dose constraint for all techniques was 64 and 53 Gy/CGE, respectively. Tumor and OAR dose-volume histograms were calculated. Results were analyzed using dose-volume histogram parameters, inhomogeneity coefficient, and conformity index. RESULTS: Gross tumor volume coverage was optimal and equally homogeneous with both IM photon and IM proton plans. Compared to the IM photon plans, the use of IM proton beam therapy leads to a substantial reduction of the OAR total integral dose in the low-level to mid-dose level. Median heart, lung, kidney, stomach, and liver mean dose and dose at the 50% volume level were consistently reduced by a factor of 1.3 to 25. Tumor dose homogeneity in IMPT(M) plans was always better than with IMPT planning (median inhomogeneity coefficient, 0.19 vs. 0.25). IMPT dose escalation (to 92.9 CGE to the GTV) was possible in all patients without exceeding the normal-tissue dose limits. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the use of IM photon therapy, when compared to IM protons, can result in similar levels of tumor conformation. IM proton therapy, however, reduces the OAR integral dose substantially, compared to IM photon radiation therapy. As a result, tumor dose escalation was always possible with IM proton planning, within the maximal OAR dose constraints. In IM proton planning, reducing the size of the proton pencil beam (using the "mini-beam") improved the dose homogeneity, but it did not have a significant effect on the dose conformity.     

A treatment planning inter-comparison of proton and intensity modulated photon radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: A comparative treatment planning study has been undertaken between standard photon delivery techniques,b intensity modulated photon methods and spot scanned protons in order to investigate the merits and limitations of each of these treatment approaches. METHODS: Plans for each modality were performed using CT scans and planning information for nine patients with varying indications and lesion sites and the results have been analysed using a variety of dose and volume based parameters. RESULTS: Over all cases, it is predicted that the use of protons could lead to a reduction of the total integral dose by a factor three compared to standard photon techniques and a factor two compared to IM photon plans. In addition, in all but one Organ at Risk (OAR) for one case, protons are predicted to reduce both mean OAR dose and the irradiated volume at the 50% mean target dose level compared to both photon methods. However, when considering the volume of an OAR irradiated to 70% or more of the target dose, little difference could be shown between proton and intensity modulated photon plans. On comparing the magnitude of dose hot spots in OARs resulting from the proton and IM photon plans, more variation was observed, and the ranking of the plans was then found to be case and OAR dependent. CONCLUSIONS: The use of protons has been found to reduce the medium to low dose load (below about 70% of the target dose) to OARs and all non-target tissues compared to both standard and inversely planned photons, but that the use of intensity modulated photons can result in similar levels of high dose conformation to that afforded by protons. However, the introduction of inverse planning methods for protons is necessary before general conclusions on the relative efficacy of photons and protons can be drawn.     

A treatment planning comparison of 3D conformal therapy, intensity modulated photon therapy and proton therapy for treatment of advanced head and neck tumours.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In this work, the potential benefits and limitations of different treatment techniques, based on mixed photon-electron beams, 3D conformal therapy, intensity modulated photons (IM) and protons (passively scattered and spot scanned), have been assessed using comparative treatment planning methods in a cohort of patients presenting with advanced head and neck tumours. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Plans for five patients were computed for all modalities using CT scans to delineate target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR) and to predict dose distributions. The prescribed dose to the PTV was 54 Gy, whilst the spinal cord was constrained to a maximum dose of 40.5 Gy for all techniques. Dose volume histograms were used for physical and biological evaluation, which included equivalent uniform dose (EUD) calculations. RESULTS: Excluding the mixed photon-electron technique, PTV coverage was within the defined limits for all techniques, with protons providing significantly improved dose homogeneity, resulting in correspondingly higher EUD results. For the spinal cord, protons also provided the best sparing with maximum doses as low as 17 Gy. Whilst the IM plans were demonstrated to be significantly superior to non-modulated photon plans, they were found to be inferior to protons for both criteria. A similar result was found for the parotid glands. Although they are partially included in the treated volume there is a clear indication that protons, and to a lesser extent IM photons, could play an important role in preserving organ functionality with a consequent improvement of the patient's quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: For advanced head and neck tumours, we have demonstrated that the use of IM photons or protons both have the potential to reduce the possibility of spinal cord toxicity. In addition, a substantial reduction of dose to the parotid glands through the use of protons enhances the interest for such a treatment modality in cases of advanced head and neck tumours. However, in terms of target coverage, the use of 3D conformal therapy, although somewhat inferior in quality to protons or IM photons, has been shown to be a reasonable alternative to the more advanced techniques. In contrast, the conventional technique of mixed photon and electron fields has been shown to be inferior to all other techniques for both target coverage and OAR involvement.     

A treatment planning study of proton arc therapy for para-aortic lymph node tumors: dosimetric evaluation of conventional proton therapy,proton arc therapy,and intensity modulated radiotherapy

Soft tissue sarcomas are uncommon tumours of mesenchymal origin, most commonly arising in the extremities. Treatment includes surgical resection in combination with radiotherapy. Resection margins are of paramount importance in surgical treatment of soft tissue sarcomas but unambiguous guidelines for ideal margins of resection are still missing as is an uniform guideline on the use of radiotherapy.

The present paper reviews the literature on soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities regarding the required resection margins, the impact of new radiotherapy techniques and the timing of radiotherapy, more particularly if it should be administered before or after surgical resection.

This review was started by searching guidelines in different databases (National Guideline Clearinghouse, EBMPracticeNet, TRIP database, NCCN guidelines,…). After refinement of the query, more specific articles were found using MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Used keywords include “soft tissue sarcoma”; “extremities OR limbs”; “radiotherapy”, “surgery”, “margins”, “local recurrence” and “overall survival”. Finally, the articles were selected based on the accessibility of the full text, use of the English language and relevance based on title and abstract.

Literature demonstrates positive resection margins to be an important adverse prognostic factor for local recurrence of soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. Still, no consensus is reached on the definition of what a good margin might be. The evolution of new radiation techniques, especially Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy, resulted in a s healthy surrounding tissues. However, the timing of radiotherapy treatment remains controversial as both preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy are characterised by several advantages and disadvantages.

     

Intensity modulated photon and proton therapy for the treatment of head and neck tumors.

PURPOSE: A comparative treatment planning study has been performed between intensity modulated photon and proton therapy to investigate the ability of both modalities to spare organs at risk in the head and neck region while keeping target dose homogeneous. Additional advantage of reducing the spot size for IMPT was also investigated. The treatment planning comparison was extended by varying the number of fields to study its effect on the performance of each modality. Risks of secondary cancer induction were also calculated for all modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five planning CTs were selected for the study. Four different constraints were set to the organs at risk in order to measure the resulting dose homogeneity in the target volume. Five and nine field plans were made for IMXT and 3, 5 and 9 field plans were made for IMPT, for both spot sizes. Dose homogeneity as a function of the mean parotid dose was visualized using a 'pseudo' Pareto-optimal front approach. Risks of secondary cancer were estimated using the organ equivalent dose model. RESULTS: Critical organs were best spared using 3-field IMPT and, at least for IMPT, little advantage was seen with increasing field numbers. Reducing the spot size does give an advantage. In contrast, there was a significant advantage in going from 5 to 9 fields for IMXT. Secondary cancer risk was lowest for the IMPT plans with reduced spot size, for which normal tissue received the lowest integral dose. Interestingly, although integral dose remained the same, increasing the number of IMPT fields increased the secondary cancer risk, due to the increased volume of tissue irradiated to low dose. CONCLUSIONS: IMPT has a better ability to spare organs at risk than IMXT for the same dose homogeneity. It also significantly reduced the estimated risk of secondary cancer induction and the use of small numbers of fields further increased this advantage. Given that target homogeneity and normal tissue sparing were equally good with the 3 field IMPT, there appears to be a clear rationale to deliver small numbers of fields for IMPT.     

Optimization of beam parameters and treatment planning for intensity modulated proton therapy

One of the objectives of the ongoing research and development work at the Northeast Proton Therapy Center (NPTC) in Boston is to perform optimized intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) treatments. Such treatments may be delivered by magnetically scanning a narrow proton pencil beam across the target volume, while both the scanning speed and the intensity of the beam are modulated. Localization of the proton dose in space allows one to yield dose distributions that are highly conformal to the target volume, thus minimizing the dose delivered to the surrounding healthy tissue. The aim of the current research is to determine technically optimal and clinically relevant specifications for the scanned beam delivery system, which is being developed in collaboration with Ion Beam Applications (IBA); and to create a link between the treatment planning and the beam delivery. IMPT treatment planning is performed for patient cases treated at the NPTC, with KonRad Pro software developed at the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ). For the IMPT delivery, the proton intensity maps, optimized for discrete pencil beam spots, need to be translated into continuous scanning patterns. At the same time it is necessary to minimize the discrepancy between the planned and delivered doses which may result from such conversion, as well as from the technical limitations of the delivery system. Possibilities have been investigated for improving the proton dose conformity by optimizing the beam and scanning nozzle parameters, and by taking the specifics and limitations of the system into account in the treatment planning stage.     

乳腺癌全乳调强放射治疗计划设计方法的研究

背景与目的: 调强放射治疗(IMRT)可显著改善全乳切线野照射中靶区与邻近危及器官的剂量学分布,然而各放疗单位优化设计全乳IMRT计划的方法仍存在较大差异.本研究利用三维治疗计划系统进行全乳IMRT的多种计划设计,以探讨最优化的设计方法.方法: 选择10例接受保乳手术的乳腺癌病例进行全乳放射治疗的常规、正向与逆向计划设计.用子野总数、总跳数等评价计划效率,用剂量体积直方图(DVH)比较靶区剂量和危及器官的受照射剂量差异.结果: 正向IMRT计划包括人工优化法(M0)、多点强制均匀优化法(P0)和自动逆向优化法(A0)等3种,子野总数的中位数分别是5、5.5和5个,逆向IMRT的中位数为20个.总跳数分别为225.8、228.4、226.4和345.8.在正向调强计划中,靶区覆盖率和剂量分布均匀性以A0计划较好(P≤0.01),而心脏、同侧肺、肝脏、对侧肺和对侧乳腺的平均剂量(D<,mean>)在A0和P0计划中明显小于M0计划(P≤0.05).逆向IMRT计划在改善PTV剂量分布均匀性以及减少OARs照射上较正向IMRT计划更好(P≤0.05).结论: 初步建立了全乳IMRT计划设计的方法,以正向计划中A0优化法在效率和剂量学优势上最适合.逆向IMRT计划较正向计划体现了更好的剂量学优势,但需要进一步研究其成熟的设计方法.     

Dosimetric benefits of robust treatment planning for intensity modulated proton therapy for base-of-skull cancers

PurposeThe clinical advantage of intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) may be diminished by range and patient setup uncertainties. We evaluated the effectiveness of robust optimization that incorporates uncertainties into the treatment planning optimization algorithm for treatment of base of skull cancers.Methods and materialsWe compared 2 IMPT planning methods for 10 patients with base of skull chordomas and chondrosarcomas: (1) conventional optimization, in which uncertainties are dealt with by creating a planning target volume (PTV); and (2) robust optimization, in which uncertainties are dealt with by optimizing individual spot weights without a PTV. We calculated root-mean-square deviation doses (RMSDs) for every voxel to generate RMSD volume histograms (RVHs). The area under the RVH curve was used for relative comparison of the 2 methods’ plan robustness. Potential benefits of robust planning, in terms of target dose coverage and homogeneity and sparing of organs at risk (OARs) were evaluated using established clinical metrics. Then the plan evaluation metrics were averaged and compared with 2-sided paired t tests. The impact of tumor volume on the effectiveness of robust optimization was also analyzed.ResultsRelative to conventionally optimized plans, robustly optimized plans were less sensitive for both targets and OARs. In the nominal scenario, robust and conventional optimization resulted in similar D_95% doses (D_95% clinical target volume [CTV]: 63.3 and 64.8 Gy relative biologic effectiveness [RBE]), P < .01]) and D_5%-D_95% (D_5%-D_95% CTV: 8.0 and 7.1 Gy[RBE], [P < .01); irradiation of OARs was less with robust optimization (brainstem V₆₀: 0.076 vs 0.26 cm³ [P < .01], left temporal lobe V₇₀: 0.22 vs 0.41 cm³, [P = .068], right temporal lobe V₇₀: 0.016 vs 0.11 cm³, [P = .096], left cochlea D_mean: 28.1 vs 30.1 Gy[RBE], [P = .023], right cochlea D_mean: 23.7 vs 25.2 Gy[RBE], [P = .059]). Results in the worst-case scenario were analogous.ConclusionsRobust optimization is effective for creating clinically feasible IMPT plans for tumors of the base of skull.     

Dose conformation of intensity-modulated stereotactic photon beams, proton beams, and intensity-modulated proton beams for intracranial lesions

PURPOSE: This study evaluates photon beam intensity-modulated stereotactic radiotherapy (IMSRT) based on dynamic leaf motion of a micromultileaf collimator (mMLC), proton beams, and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) with respect to target coverage and organs at risk. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Dose plans of 6 stereotactically treated patients were recalculated for IMSRT by use of the same field setup and an inverse planning algorithm. Proton and IMPT plans were calculated anew. Three different tumor shapes, multifocal, ovoid, and irregular, were analyzed, as well as dose to organs-at-risk (OAR) in the vicinity of the planning target volume (PTV). Dose distributions were calculated from beam-setup data for a manual mMLC for stereotactically guided conformal radiotherapy (SCRT), a dynamic mMLC for IMSRT, the spot-scanning technique for protons, and a modified spot-scanning technique for IMPT. SCRT was included for a part of the comparison. Criteria for assessment were PTV coverage, dose-volume histograms (DVH), volumes of specific isodoses, and the dose to OAR. RESULTS: Dose conformation to the PTV is equally good for all three techniques and tumor shapes considered. The volumes of the 90% and 80% isodose were comparable for all techniques. For the 50% isodose volume, a divergence between the two modes was seen. In 3 cases, this volume is smaller for IMSRT, and in the 3 other cases, it is smaller for IMPT. This difference was even more pronounced for the volumes of the 30% isodose; IMPT shows further improvement over conventional protons. OAR in concavities (e.g., the brainstem) were similarly well spared by protons and IMSRT. IMPT spares critical organs best. Fewer proton beams are required to achieve similar results. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of intensity modulation improves the conformality of mMLC-based SCRT. Conformation of dose to the PTV is comparable for IMSRT, protons, and IMPT. Concerning the sparing of OAR, IMSRT is equivalent to IMPT, and IMPT is superior to conventional protons. The advantage of protons lies in the lower integral dose.     

Comparison of modulated electron radiotherapy to conventional electron boost irradiation and volumetric modulated photon arc therapy for treatment of tumour bed boost in breast cancer

Background and purpose

To compare few leaf electron collimator (FLEC)-based modulated electron radiotherapy (MERT) to conventional direct electron (DE) and volumetric modulated photon arc therapy (VMAT) for the treatment of tumour bed boost in breast cancer.

Materials and methods

Fourteen patients with breast cancer treated by lumpectomy and requiring post-operative whole breast radiotherapy with tumour bed boost were planned retrospectively using conventional DE, VMAT and FLEC-based MERT. The planning goal was to deliver 10 Gy to at least 95% of the tumour bed volume. Dosimetry parameters for all techniques were compared.

Results

Dose evaluation volume (DEV) coverage and homogeneity were best for MERT (D₉₈ = 9.77 Gy, D₂ = 11.03 Gy) followed by VMAT (D₉₈ = 9.56 Gy, D₂ = 11.07 Gy) and DE (D₉₈ = 9.81 Gy, D₂ = 11.52 Gy). Relative to the DE plans, the MERT plans predicted a reduction of 35% in mean breast dose (p < 0.05), 54% in mean lung dose (p < 0.05) and 46% in mean body dose (p < 0.05). Relative to the VMAT plans, the MERT plans predicted a reduction of 24%, 36% and 39% in mean breast dose, heart dose and body dose, respectively (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

MERT plans were a considerable improvement in dosimetry over DE boost plans. There was a dosimetric advantage in using MERT over VMAT for increased DEV conformity and low-dose sparing of healthy tissue including the integral dose; however, the cost is often an increase in the ipsilateral lung high-dose volume.     

Recent advances in intensity modulated radiotherapy and proton therapy for esophageal cancer

Introduction: Radiotherapy is an important component of the standard of care for esophageal cancer. In the past decades, significant improvements in the planning and delivery of radiation techniques have led to better dose conformity to the target volume and improved normal tissue sparing.

Areas covered: This review focuses on the advances in radiotherapy techniques and summarizes the availably dosimetric and clinical outcomes of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy, proton therapy, and four-dimensional radiotherapy for esophageal cancer, and discusses the challenges and future development of proton therapy.

Expert commentary: Although three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy is the standard radiotherapy technique in esophageal cancer, the retrospectively comparative studies strongly suggest that the dosimetric advantage of IMRT over three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy can translate into improved clinical outcomes, despite the lack of prospective randomized evidence. As a novel form of conventional IMRT technique, volumetric modulated arc therapy can produce equivalent or superior dosimetric quality with significantly higher treatment efficiency in esophageal cancer. Compared with photon therapy, proton therapy has the potential to achieve further clinical improvement due to their physical properties; however, prospective clinical data, long-term results, and cost-effectiveness are needed.     

Critical appraisal of the role of volumetric modulated arc therapy in the radiation therapy management of breast cancer

Background

The aim of this review is the critical appraisal of the current use of volumetric modulated arc therapy for the radiation therapy management of breast cancer. Both clinical and treatment planning studies were investigated.

Material and methods

A Pubmed/MEDLINE search of the National Library of Medicine was performed to identify VMAT and breast related articles. After a first order rejection of the irrelevant findings, the remaining articles were grouped according to two main categories: clinical vs. planning studies and to some sub-categories (pointing to significant technical features). Main areas of application, dosimetric and clinical findings as well as areas of innovations were defined.

Results

A total of 131 articles were identified and of these, 67 passed a first order selection. Six studies reported clinical results while 61 treatment dealed with treatment planning investigations. Among the innovation lines, the use of high intensity photon beams (flattening filter free), altered fractionation schemes (simultaneous integrated boost, accelerated partial breast irradiation, single fraction), prone positioning and modification of standard VMAT (use of dynamic trajectories or hybrid VMAT methods) resulted among the main relevant fields of interest. Approximately 10% of the publications reported upon respiratory gating in conjunction with VMAT.

Conclusions

The role of VMAT in the radiation treatment of breast cancer seems to be consolidated in the in-silico arena while still limited evidence and only one phase II trial appeared in literature from the clinical viewpoint. More clinical reports are needed to fully proove the expected dosimetric benefits demonstrated in the planning investigations.

     

Radiotherapy of small intracranial tumours with different advanced techniques using photon and proton beams: a treatment planning study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The potential benefits and limitations of five different radiation techniques, 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), stereotactic arc therapy (SRS/T), intensity modulated radiotherapy with photons (IMRT), and radiotherapy with protons (spot scanning (SSp) or passive scattering (PSp)), have been assessed using comparative treatment planning methods in a cohort of patients presenting with 'benign' brain tumours. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Plans for five acoustic neurinomas, five meningiomas, and two pituitary adenomas were computed for all modalities using computed tomography (CT) scans to delineate planning target volume and organs at risk (OARs) and to predict dose distributions. Dose-volume histograms were used for physical and simple biological evaluation. RESULTS: Proton techniques were shown to be superior to all photon approaches for the irradiation of small brain lesions in terms of target dose uniformity and conformity and in terms of sparing OARs. No major differences were observed between the results of the photon techniques, which were generally good for target coverage. Minimum target doses ranged from 81% with SRS/T to 93% with IMRT. The volume receiving more than 95% of the dose ranged from 95% (SRS/T) to 99% (PSp). No clear patterns of coverage dependence upon target shape were observed. Maximum brain stem irradiation ranged from 60% with IMRT to 26% with protons and the conformity index from 4.4 with IMRT to 2.5 with protons. Considering the rather long life expectancy of the patients suffering from meningiomas, neurinomas, and pituitary adenomas, the most important aspect to be considered, other than target coverage, is toxicity and in the long term, the possibility of secondary tumour induction. Considering these aspects, proton irradiation should be the irradiation technique of choice, when available. If not, IMRT, or even 3DCRT, techniques can provide an acceptable compromise, even without recurring to unconventional treatments like SRS/T, which require complex installations and high machine occupancy.     

Sensitivity of intensity modulated proton therapy plans to changes in patient weight.

PURPOSE: A retrospective study to investigate the sensitivity of intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) to changes in body weight occurring during the course of radiotherapy for patients treated in the sacral region. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During therapy, important weight gain and loss were observed for two patients treated to para-spinal tumors, which resulted in both patients being re-scanned and re-planned. Both patients were treated as part of their therapy, with a narrow-angle IMPT (NA-IMPT) plan delivering a 'dose hole' around the cauda equina (CE), which was mainly formed through modulation of Bragg peaks in depth. To investigate the impact of these weight changes on the proton range and delivered dose, the nominal fields were re-calculated on the new CT data sets. Results were analyzed by comparing these new plans with those originally delivered and by calculating changes in range and delivered doses in target volumes and normal tissues. RESULTS: Maximum differences in proton range in the CE region of up to +8 mm and -13 mm, respectively, for the patient who gained weight and for the patient who lost weight, increased the maximum dose to the CE by only 2%. This indicates that both IMPT plans were relatively insensitive to substantial range uncertainties. Even greater differences in range (16 mm) in the planning target volume only slightly affected its dose homogeneity (differences in V(90%) of 6% in the worst case). Nevertheless, some large undesired local dose differences were observed. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated, that, at least for the two analyzed cases, NA-IMPT plans are less sensitive to weight variations than one may expect. Still, we would advise to calculate new plans in case of substantial change in weight for patients treated in the sacral region, primarily due to the presence of new hot/cold area.     

局部晚期喉癌3DCRT与IMRT放疗计划的剂量学对比

目的 利用ECLIPSE计划系统对局部晚期喉癌适形放疗(3DCRT)和逆向调强适形放疗(IMRT)计划作剂量学比较,评估不同照射方法的优缺点。方法 选择6例病理证实的局部晚期喉癌患者,用ECLIPSE对每例患者分别作出3DCRT和IMRT计划。根据靶区V95%、D5%、D95%、靶区最大值、最小值及平均值和正常组织受量D50、D33、D5、Dmax和Dmean来比较这两种计划剂量学的差异。结果 两种不同计划中的靶区分布中,GTV和GTVnd差别不大,但对于亚临床区CTV和某些正常组织有统计学差异。结论 对局部晚期喉癌原发灶及阳性淋巴结,3DCRT和IMRT计划均有较好覆盖。但在亚临床病灶方面,IMRT比3DCRT包含靶区更好一些,且IMRT减少了腮腺正常组织的照射剂量。     

The clinical value of non-coplanar photon beams in biologically optimized intensity modulated dose delivery on deep-seated tumours

The aim of the present study is to compare the merits of different radiobiologically optimized treatment techniques using few-field planar and non-coplanar dose delivery on an advanced cancer of the cervix, with rectum and bladder as principal organs at risk. Classically, the rational for using non-coplanar beams is to minimize the overlap of beam entrance and exit regions and to find new beam directions avoiding organs at risk, in order to reduce damage to sensitive normal tissues. Two four-beam configurations have been extensively studied. The first consists of three evenly spaced coplanar beams and a fourth non-coplanar beam. A second tetrahedral-like configuration, with two symmetric non-coplanar beams at the same gantry angle and two coplanar beams, with optimized beam directions, was also tested. The present study shows that when radiobiologically optimized intensity modulated beams are applied to such a geometry, only a marginal increase in the treatment outcome can be achieved by non-coplanar beams compared to the optimal coplanar treatment. The main reason for this result is that the high dose in the beam-overlap regions is already optimally reduced by biologically optimized intensity modulation in the plane. The large number of degrees of freedom already incorporated in the treatment by the use of intensity modulation and radiobiological optimization, leads to the saturation of the benefit acquired by a further increase in the degrees of freedom with non-coplanar beams. In conclusion, the use coplanar of radiobiologically optimized intensity modulation simplifies the dose delivery, reducing the need for non-coplanar beam portals.     

Pre-treatment verification of intensity modulated photon beams with films and electronic portal imaging--two years of clinical experience

Aim of this report was to summarise clinical experience in the field of pre-treatment dosimetric verification of intensity-modulated photon beams (IRMT). From May 2001 to July 2003, 50 patients were irradiated according to IMRT techniques with 6 MV photon beams produced by a Varian Clinac equipped with a 80 leaves multileaf collimator. Dose plans were computed using commercial treatment planning systems, Nucletron Helax-TMS for static cases and Varian Eclipse-Helios for dynamic cases. Pre-treatment dosimetric verification was carried out on a field-per-field basis measuring 2D absolute dose distributions in solid water at 10 cm depth using films or an electronic portal imaging device (EPID). Verification measurements were compared with expected dose maps, and differences were evaluated by means of both a point-to-point analysis and the Gamma Index. Irradiated target volumes (30 head and neck, 8 breast, 12 other patients) ranged from 111 to 2121 cm3 with a mean of 652 +/- 378 cm3. Twenty-nine dose plans were delivered with dynamic technique and 44 with static technique. On average, 5.9 +/- 1.3 fields were applied per plan, with 12.1 +/- 1.6 segments per field in the static mode. Averaging over the whole number of fields we obtained a mean difference (on a pixel-by-pixel basis and per 100 MU delivered) of -0.22 +/- 0.64 cGy between calculation and measurement, with a standard deviation of 1.93 +/- 0.65 cGy. The mean value for the Gamma Index evaluation was 0.47 +/- 0.10, with a mean standard deviation of 0.35 +/- 0.17. The fraction of pixels lying inside the field and showing a gamma index larger than 1 was 5.7% for the triplet Eclipse-film-dynamic delivery and 9.9% for the triplet Helax-TMS-EPID-static delivery. The employed IMRT treatments proved that this technique is feasible and dosimetrically accurate. Treatment verification stability and dosimetric analysis of treated plans are highly satisfactory and allow the safe introduction of this modality in the spectrum of techniques offered to a large class of patients.