Predictive value of circulating immature cell counts in peripheral blood for timing of peripheral blood progenitor cell collection after G-CSF plus chemotherapy-induced mobilization

BACKGROUND: Enumeration of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood (PB) before apheresis predicts the number of CD34+ cells collected, although flow cytometric techniques used are complex and expensive. In an attempt to determine the optimal timing for peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection, the usefulness of circulating immature cell (CIC) counts in PB was evaluated. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: CIC counts in PB and CD34+ cell counts in the apheresis product from 249 collections were assessed, and the relationship between these two parameters was evaluated by with the Pearson rank correlation analysis, the Fisher exact test, and the U-test. RESULTS: CIC counts were correlated significantly with the number of CD34+ cells per kg of patient's body weight in the apheresis product (Pearson rank correlation analysis: r = 0.635, p < 0.0001). When a level of 1 x 10(9) CICs per L was selected as a cutoff value, the sensitivity and specificity for collecting more than 1 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg of body weight were 75.7 and 85.5 percent, respectively. CONCLUSION: The present study strongly suggests that the number of CICs in PB may estimate the number of CD34+ cells collected. The data indicate that CIC counts above 1 x 10(9) per L can be used as a good predictor for PBPC collections containing more than 1 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg of body weight in a single apheresis procedure.     

The predictive value of white cell or CD34+ cell count in the peripheral blood for timing apheresis and maximizing yield

BACKGROUND: The collection of peripheral blood stem and progenitor cells (PBPCs) for transplantation can be time-consuming and expensive. Thus, the utility of counting CD34+ cells and white cells (WBCs) in the peripheral blood was evaluated as a predictor of CD34+ cell yield in the apheresis component. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The WBC and CD34+ cell counts in the peripheral blood and the apheresis components from 216 collections were assessed. Sixty-three patients underwent mobilization with chemotherapy plus filgrastim, and 17 patients and 14 allogeneic PBPC donors did so with filgrastim alone. The relationship between the number of WBC and CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood and in the apheresis component was analyzed by using rank correlation and linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The correlation coefficient for CD34+ cells per liter of peripheral blood with CD34+ cell yield (x 10(6)/kg) was 0.87 (n = 216 collections). This correlation existed for many patient and collection variables. However, patients with acute myeloid leukemia had fewer CD34+ cells in the apheresis component at any level of peripheral blood CD34+ cell count. Components collected from patients with CD34+ cell counts below 10 x 10(6) per L in the peripheral blood contained a median of 0.75 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. When the WBC count in the blood was below 5.0 x 10(9) per L, the median number of CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood was 5.6 x 10(6) per L (range, 1.0-15.5 x 10(6)/L). A very poor correlation was found between the WBC count in the blood and the CD34+ cell yield (p = 0.12, n = 158 collections). CONCLUSION: The number of CD34+ cells, but not WBCs, in the peripheral blood can be used as a predictor for timing of apheresis and estimating PBPC yield. This is a robust relationship not affected by a variety of patient and collection factors except the diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia. Patients who undergo mobilization with chemotherapy and filgrastim also should undergo monitoring of peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts, beginning when the WBC count in the blood exceeds 1.0 to 5.0 x 10(9) per L.     

Evaluation of an algorithm based on peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitor cell and CD34+ cell concentrations to optimize peripheral blood progenitor cell collection by apheresis

BACKGROUND: Quantification of peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cells is commonly used to plan peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection but is time-consuming. Sysmex has developed a hematology analyzer that can quickly identify a population of immature hematopoietic cells (HPCs) according to cell size, cell density, and differential lysis resistance, which may indicate the presence of PBPCs in PB. This prospective study has evaluated the potential of such method to predict the PBPC mobilization. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 141 patients underwent PBPC mobilization. PB HPCs and PB CD34+ cells were simultaneously quantified with a hematology analyzer (SE2100, Sysmex) and flow cytometry, respectively. The number of blood volumes processed was then based on PB CD34+ cell concentration. RESULTS: The optimal PB HPC level able to predict a minimal level of 10 x 10(6) PB CD34+ cells per L was 5 x 10(6) per L with positive and negative predictive values of 0.93 and 0.36 percent, respectively. For this cutoff point, sensitivity and specificity were 0.81 and 0.65, respectively. The median number of blood volumes processed according to the PB CD34+ cell count allowed us to perform only one apheresis procedure for a majority of patients. CONCLUSION: PB HPC quantification is very useful to quickly determine the initiation of PBPC apheresis especially for patients with higher concentrations. For patients exhibiting a lower HPC count (<5 x 10(6)/L), other parameters such as a CD34 test may be needed. Such a policy associated with a length of apheresis adapted to the richness in the PB CD34+ cells allows for optimizing the organization of centers with an improvement in patient comfort and economical savings.     

The absolute number of peripheral blood CD34+ cells predicts a timing for apheresis and progenitor cell yield in patients with hematologic malignancies and solid tumors

Retrospective analysis was conducted in 51 autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collections using the Spectra AutoPBSC System from patients with hematologic malignancies and solid tumors to study the predictive value of CD34+ cell counts in the peripheral blood for the yield of CD34+ cells in the apheresis product. The correlation coefficients for CD34+ cells microL(-1) of peripheral blood with CD34+ cell yield (x 10(6) kg(-1) of body weight and x 10(5) kg(-1) of body weight L(-1) of blood processed) were 0.903 and 0.778 (n=51 collections), respectively. Products collected from patients with CD34+ cell counts below 15 microL(-1) in the peripheral blood contained a median of 0.49 x 10(6) CD34+ cells kg(-1) (range: 0.05-2.55), whereas those with CD34+ cell counts more than 15 microL(-1) contained a median of 3.72 x 10(6) CD34+ cells kg(-1) (range: 1.06-37.57). From these results, a number of at least 15 CD34+ cells microL(-1) in the peripheral blood ensured a minimum yield of 1 x 10(6) CD34+ cells kg(-1) as obtained by a single apheresis procedure. The number of CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood can be used as a good predictor for timing of apheresis and estimating PBPC yield. With regard to our results, apheresis with a possibly poor efficiency should be avoided because the collection procedure is time-consuming and expensive.     

Monitoring of peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts on the first day of apheresis is highly predictive for efficient CD34+ cell yield.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation of preleukapheresis circulating CD 34+ cells/micro L, white blood cells (WBC), and platelet counts on the first day of apheresis with the yield of collected CD 34+ cell counts in 40 patients with hematological malignancies (n = 29) and solid tumors (n = 11). The median numbers of apheresis cycles, numbers of CD 34+ cells, peripheral blood (PB) mononuclear cells, and total nucleated cells collected were 2 (range, 1-4), 5.5 x 106/kg (range, 0.05-33.78), 2.59 x 108/kg (range, 0.04-20.68), and 7.36 x 108/kg (range, 0.15-28.08), respectively. There was a strong correlation between the number of preleukapheresis circulating CD 34+ cells/micro L and the yield of collected CD 34+ cells per kilogram (r = 0.962, p < 0.001). The threshold levels of PB C 34+ cell/micro L to obtain > or =1 x 106/kg and > or =2.5 x 106/kg CD 34+ cell in one collection were 12/micro L and 34/ micro L, respectively. Fifteen of 17 (88%) patients who had > or =34 CD 34+ cells/ micro L in the PB before collection reached the level of > or =2.5 x 106/kg in a single apheresis. Despite a low r value, WBC and platelet counts on the first day of apheresis also correlated with the yield of collected daily CD 34+ cells per kilogram (r = 0.482, p < 0.01 and r = 0.496 p < 0.01, respectively). These data suggest that preleukapheresis circulating CD 34+ cells/ micro L correlated significantly better with the yield of collected CD 34+ cells than WBC and platelet counts on the first day of apheresis. Using a value of 34/micro L preleukapheresis circulating CD 34+ cells as a guide for the timing of peripheral blood stem cells collections can be time saving and cost-effective.     

Kinetics of PBPC mobilization by cyclophosphamide, as compared with that by epirubicin/paclitaxel followed by G-CSF support: implications for optimal timing of PBPC harvest

BACKGROUND: Limited information is available on the mobilization kinetics of autologous PBPCs after induction with various chemotherapy regimens. With PBPC mobilization in patients with breast cancer used as a model for chemotherapy-induced PBPC recruitment, the kinetics of progenitor cells mobilized either with cyclophosphamide (CY) or epirubicin/paclitaxel (EPI-TAX) followed by the administration of G-CSF was compared. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The study included a total of 86 patients with breast cancer (stage II-IV) receiving either CY (n = 39) or EPI-TAX (n = 47), both followed by G-CSF support. The progenitor cell content in peripheral blood and apheresis components was monitored by flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+ cells. PBPC collection was started when the threshold of >20 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per L of peripheral blood was reached. RESULTS: The PBPC collection was begun a median of 9 days after the administration of EPI-TAX followed by G-CSF support, as compared to a median of 13 days after mobilization with CY plus G-CSF. After treatment with CY, the total numbers of PBPCs peaked on Day 1 of apheresis, and they rapidly declined thereafter. In contrast, treatment with EPI-TAX followed by G-CSF administration led to a steady mobilization of CD34+ cells during leukapheresis. The difference in the mobilization patterns with CY and EPI-TAX resulted in a greater yield of CD34+ cells per L of processed blood volume. Compared to EPI-TAX, mobilization with CY required the overall processing of 30 percent less whole-blood volume to reach the target yield of > or = 10 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg of body weight. After a median of three apheresis procedures, however, both CY+G-CSF and EPI-TAX+G-CSF were equally effective in obtaining this target yield. CONCLUSION: These results imply that specific PBPC mobilization as part of a given chemotherapy regimen should be taken into consideration before the planning of a PBPC harvest.     

Progenitor cell recruitment during individualized high-flow, very-large-volume apheresis for autologous transplantation improves collection efficiency

BACKGROUND: Individual adaptation of processed patient's blood volume (PBV) should reduce number and/or duration of autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collections. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The durations of leukapheresis procedures were adapted by means of an interim analysis of harvested CD34+ cells to obtain the intended yield of CD34+ within as few and/or short as possible leukapheresis procedures. Absolute efficiency (AE; CD34+/kg body weight) and relative efficiency (RE; total CD34+ yield of single apheresis/total number of preapheresis CD34+) were calculated, assuming an intraapheresis recruitment if RE was greater than 1, and a yield prediction models for adults was generated. RESULTS: A total of 196 adults required a total of 266 PBPC collections. The median AE was 7.99 x 10(6), and the median RE was 1.76. The prediction model for AE showed a satisfactory predictive value for preapheresis CD34+ only. The prediction model for RE also showed a low predictive value (R2 = 0.36). Twenty-eight children underwent 44 PBPC collections. The median AE was 12.13 x 10(6), and the median RE was 1.62. Major complications comprised bleeding episodes related to central venous catheters (n = 4) and severe thrombocytopenia of less than 10 x 10(9) per L (n = 16). CONCLUSION: A CD34+ interim analysis is a suitable tool for individual adaptation of the duration of leukapheresis. During leukapheresis, a substantial recruitment of CD34+ was observed, resulting in a RE of greater than 1 in more than 75 percent of patients. The upper limit of processed PBV showing an intraapheresis CD34+ recruitment is higher than in a standard large-volume leukapheresis. Therefore, a reduction of individually needed PBPC collections by means of a further escalation of the processed PBV seems possible.     

The number of CD34(+) cells in peripheral blood as a predictor of the CD34(+) yield in patients going to autologous stem cell transplantation

The number of CD34(+) cells in peripheral blood (PB) is a guide to the optimal timing to harvest peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC). The objective was to determine the number of CD34(+) cells in PB that allows achieving a final apheresis product containing > or =1.5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg, performing up to three aphereses. Between March 1999 and August 2003, patients with hematological and solid malignancies who underwent leukapheresis for autologous bone marrow transplantation were prospectively evaluated. Seventy-two aphereses in 48 patients were performed (mean 1.45 per patient; range 1-3). PBPC were mobilized with cyclophosphamide plus recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) (n = 40), other chemotherapy drugs plus G-CSF (n = 7), or G-CSF alone (n = 1). We found a strong correlation between the CD34(+) cells count in peripheral blood and the CD34(+) cells yielded (r = 0.903; P < 0.0001). Using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves, the minimum number of CD34(+) cells in PB to obtain > or =1.5 x 10(6)/kg in the first apheresis was 16.48 cells/microL (sensitivity 100%; specificity 95%). The best cut-off point necessary to obtain the same target in the final harvest was 15.48 cells/microL, performing up to three aphereses (sensitivity 89%; specificity 100%). In our experience, > or =15 CD34(+) cells/microL is the best predictor to begin the apheresis procedure. Based on this threshold level, it is possible to achieve at least 1.5 x 10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells in the graft with < or =3 collections.     

外周血CD34+细胞绝对计数可靠预示自体外周血干细胞采集效果

目的　为确定外周血CD34+细胞绝对计数能否可靠预示自体外周血干细胞的采集效果。方法　用流式细胞仪ProCOUNT方法对采集的 2 5份次移植物和采集当天外周血行CD34+细胞绝对计数 ,同时做外周血常规检查和移植物集落形成单位 (CFU)计数 ,每份次移植物以CD34+/kg ,单个核细胞 (MNC) /kg,粒 巨噬细胞集落形成单位 (CFU GM) /kg ,红细胞集落形成单位 (CFU E) /kg等为指标 ,与患者采集当天的外周血CD34+细胞绝对计数、CD34+细胞百分比、WBC ,MNC ,中性粒细胞(NEU)或血小板 (PLT)等各项指标进行相关分析和逐步回归分析。结果　 ( 1)Spearman相关分析结果 :外周血CD34+细胞绝对计数与移植物CD34+/kg高度相关 (r=0 790 ,P <0 0 0 1) ,外周血CD34+细胞百分比与移植物CD34+/kg相关 (r=0 6 17,P <0 0 5 )。外周血WBC、MNC、NEU、PLT或RBC与移植物CD34+/kg无关。外周血CD34+细胞绝对计数与移植物CFU E相关 ,而与CFU GM无关。外周血MNC与移植物MNC/kg相关。 ( 2 )逐步回归分析结果 :移植物CD34+/kg只与外周血CD34+细胞绝对计数高度相关 (P <0 0 0 1) ,而与外周血CD34+细胞百分比无关。结论　移植物CD34+/kg只与外周血CD34+细胞绝对计数高度相关 ,外周血CD34+细胞绝对计数能够可靠预示自体外周血干细胞的采集效果     

Optimization of CD34+ collection for autologous transplantation using the evolution of peripheral blood cell counts after mobilization with chemotherapy and G-CSF.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) collection after high dose chemotherapy can be influenced by several factors. We searched for parameters that may predict the best day to start harvesting of PBPC in order to collect most CD34+ cells with the least number of aphereses. METHODS: We studied patients who underwent mobilization chemotherapy for autologous transplantation. The influence of age, sex, diagnosis, number of previous chemotherapy cycles, peripheral blood (PB) counts at day of mobilization (D0), day of neutrophils <1.0 x 10(9) l(-1) and day of nadir and interval between both (delta) on harvesting was investigated. Multivariate linear correlation models were built to predict the best harvesting with principles of parsimony. In patients where sequential CD34+ cell count was performed, the theoretical day of peak was calculated by interpolation in polynomial regression. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty four patients entered the analysis: 36 Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), 65 B-large cell lymphoma (NHL) and 33 multiple myeloma (MM). Day of harvesting correlated with nr CHT, hemoglobin on D0, day of granulocytes <1.0 x 10(9) l(-1), delta and dosis of mobilization therapy. The day of CD34+ peak could be calculated by the formula = (-0.41) x Hemoglobin D0 + (day peripheral CD34+ cells = 10 x 10(6) microl(-1)) x 0.99 + 7.8. This model could explain 81% of the variance of the peak day and was stable by bootstrap resampling. Day of peripheral CD34+ cells = 10 x 10(6) microl(-1) preceded the calculated peak by 3-9 days. CONCLUSIONS: Although the day of best collection can be predicted using only sequential PB counts after mobilization chemotherapy, a model of prediction using peripheral CD34+ cell count is important especially for optimizing collection in poor mobilizing patients.     

The role of diagnosis in patients failing peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization

BACKGROUND: Failure to mobilize PBPCs for auto-logous transplantation has mostly been attributed to previous therapy and poses therapeutic problems. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The role of underlying disease was analyzed in 17 of 73 (23%) patients with PBPC mobilization failure, and secondary mobilization with high-dose filgrastim was attempted. RESULTS: Of 16 patients with acute leukemia, 13 (81%) mobilized poorly. In contrast, of 57 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and solid tumor, 53 (93%, p < 0.001) showed good PBPC mobilization. Relapsed disease did not predispose to poor mobilization. As secondary mobilization attempt, 7 patients received 25 micro g per kg per day filgrastim without chemotherapy leading to a 3.7 +/- 2.8-fold (SD) increase in the maximum number of circulating CD34+ cells (p = 0.104). PBPC apheresis yielded 3.3 (+/-0.5) x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg of body weight in 5 patients. Four poor mobilizers received 50 micro g per kg per day filgrastim as second or third mobilization attempt. Circulating CD34+ cells in these patients increased by 1.5 (+/-0.7) compared with the primary G-CSF application. CONCLUSION: Selective PBPC mobilization failure was seen in patients with acute leukemia whereas remarkably good mobilization was seen in other malignancies. Increasing the filgrastim dose to 25 micro g per kg per day may allow PBPC collection in patients failing PBPC mobilization.     

Initiation of peripheral blood progenitor cell harvest based on peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitor cell counts enumerated by the Sysmex SE9000

BACKGROUND: The most reliable index for timing peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection following mobilization is still to be determined. The techniques to enumerate peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cells are expensive and time-consuming. The SE9000 (Sysmex) provides an estimate of immature cells, called hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs). The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the efficacy of PB HPC levels for timing PBPC harvest. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients (15 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and 20 multiple myeloma) were enrolled. PB HPCs and harvested CD34+ cells were counted with the SE9000 and flow cytometry, respectively. Circulating HPCs were monitored daily. PBPC harvest was initiated when HPC levels reached at least 5 per mm(3). RESULTS: HPC levels reached 5 per mm(3) or more on Median Day 12 (range, days 9 to 16) of mobilizing chemotherapy. The median number of CD34+ cells collected per patient was 19.40 x 10(6) per kg (range, 1.94 x 10(6)-52.55 x 10(6) per kg). Both successful and optimal harvest was achieved in 97 percent of patients. PBPCs were successfully harvested in 25 patients (71%) in one session. An optimal harvest in a single session was attained in 16 patients (46%). CONCLUSION: This might be the first prospective study showing the PB HPC level for timing PBPC harvest.     

The absolute number of circulating CD34+ cells as the best predictor of peripheral hematopoietic stem cell yield.

Many controversies still exist about the timing of leukapheresis procedures for PBSC transplantation. Thirty-nine patients were followed daily by monitoring the absolute PB WBC count and CD34+ cell enumeration prior to apheresis. These determinations were compared with the apheresis cell content (nucleated cells and CD34+ cells yield). There was a highly significant correlation between PB CD34+ cells and apheresis CD34+ cell yield (r = 0.921, p < 0.001). A small but significant correlation was found between the PB WBC count and the apheresis nucleated cell content (r = 0.383, p < 0.001), but no correlation was found between PB WBC count and apheresis CD34+ cell yield (r = -0.065, p = 0.460). A target value of 20 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/L was determined to be the most reliable predictor to collect at least 1.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg in a single apheresis. Of the 39 patients, 20 could be followed after transplantation, and a good correlation was found for total number of CD34+ cells reinfused and platelet and neutrophil engraftment. No correlation was found for nucleated cells infused and engraftment. CD34+ cell determination is a better predictor than WBC count for timing leukapheresis and is thus recommended for monitoring the quality of the product.     

Analysis of PBPC cell yields during large-volume leukapheresis of subjects with a poor mobilization response to filgrastim

BACKGROUND: The circulating CD34 count is a reliable predictor of peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) yields in subjects with a vigorous mobilization response to G-CSF, however, the value of this parameter in poor mobilizers is uncharacterized. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Consecutive PBPC procedures (n = 81) with preapheresis CD34 counts less than 20 per microL (poor mobilizers) were compared with an equal number of good mobilizers (preapheresis CD34 counts > or =20/microL). G-CSF was administered at standard doses (10 microg/kg/day). RESULTS: CD34 yields correlated strongly with preapheresis CD34 counts in both good and poor mobilizers and were higher in allogeneic than autologous donors. For a standard 75-kg recipient, a CD34 cell dose of greater than 2 x 10(6) per kg was never achieved in less than two 15-L procedures if the preapheresis CD34 count was less than 8 per microL. Preapheresis WBC and MNC counts were lower in poor than in good mobilizers (28.4 vs. 43.0 and 3.25 vs. 5.01 x 10(3)/microL, respectively, p < 0.0001). Total WBC counts correlated more strongly with preapheresis CD34 counts, total CD34 yields, and CD34 yields per L processed in good mobilizers (R = 0.50, R = 0.44, and R = 0.42, respectively) than in poor mobilizers (R = 0.22, R = 0.02, and R = 0.01, respectively), whereas total MNC counts correlated more strongly with these parameters in poor (R = 0.38, R = 0.23, and R = 0.27, respectively) than in good mobilizers (R = 0.04, R = 0.13, and R = 0.16, respectively). CONCLUSION: CD34 cell yields correlate strongly with preapheresis CD34 counts. Based on this analysis, a CD34 count greater than or equal to 8 per microL is the threshold for performing PBPC collections in our institution.     

High-dose CD34+ cells are not clinically relevant in reducing cytopenia and blood component consumption following myeloablative therapy and peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation as compared with standard dose

BACKGROUND: No agreement exists about the number of autologous peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) to transfuse for optimal hematologic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: To determine CD34+ cell dosage following high-dose chemotherapy (in terms of hematologic recovery and blood component consumption), the effects of two schedules of CD34+ cell transfusions in a cohort of patients with myeloma or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were examined. Forty patients (Group 1) received between 2.5 and 5 x 106 CD34+ cells per kg, with a median of 3.4 x 106 per kg following high-dose chemotherapy, and 40 patients (Group 2), selected to match Group 1 for age, diagnosis, prior therapies, and procedure for PBPC mobilization, received a dose of CD34+ cells >5 x 106 per kg, with a median of 8.4 x 106 per kg (5-33). RESULTS: The median number of days to achieve a neutrophil count of >0.5 x 109 per L and unsupported platelets of >20 x 109 per L was identical for the two groups, but the time required to reach 1.5 x 109 neutrophils per L and 50 x 109 platelets per L was greatly delayed in Group 1. No significant difference was observed for the median number of RBC and platelet transfusions, or for the proportion of patients in each group that did not require either platelet or RBC transfusions. CONCLUSION: Our data confirm a dose-response relationship between CD34+ cell dose transfused and time to hematologic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy. However, the minimal Hb and platelet counts for transfusion independence in the two groups are similar when the CD34+ cell dose is greater than 5 x 106 CD34+ cells per kg. Therefore, our data suggest that it is not necessary to go on with apheresis procedures after 5 x 106 CD34+ cells per kg are harvested to sustain one high-dose chemotherapy.     

Large-volume leukapheresis using femoral venous access for harvesting peripheral blood stem cells with the Fenwal CS 3000 Plus from normal healthy donors: predictors of CD34+ cell yield and collection efficiency

The current paper reports on the predicting factors associated with satisfactory peripheral blood stem cell collection and the efficacy of large-volume leukapheresis (LVL) using femoral vein catheterization to harvest PBSCs with Fenwal CS 3000 Plus from normal healthy donors for allogeneic transplantation. A total of 113 apheresis procedures in 57 patients were performed. The median number of MNCs, CD3+ cells, and CD34+ cells harvested per apheresis was 5.3 x 10(8)/kg (range, 0.3-11.0 x 10(8)/kg), 3.0 x 10(8)/kg (range, 0.2-6.6 x 10(8)/kg), and 7.9 x 10(6)/kg (range, 0.1-188.9 x 10(6)/kg), respectively. The median collection efficiency of MNCs and CD34+ cells was 49.8% and 49.7%, respectively. A highly significant correlation was found between the collected CD34+ cell counts and the pre-apheresis WBC counts in the donors (P = 0.013), and between the collected CD34+ cell counts and the pre-apheresis peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cell counts (P<0.001). Harvesting at least >4 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells from the 1st LVL was achieved in 44 (77.2%) out of 57 donors and in 19 (90.5%) out of 21 donors with a PB-CD34+ cell count of >40/microl. There was no significant difference in the harvested MNC and CD34+ cell counts between the 1st and 2nd apheresis. The catheter-related complications included catheter obstruction (n = 2) and hematoma at the insertion site (n = 3). Accordingly, LVL using femoral venous access for allogeneic PBSC collection from normal healthy donors would appear to be safe and effective.     

Factors affecting mobilization of CD34+ cells in normal donors treated with filgrastim

BACKGROUND: Multiple days of apheresis are required for some normal peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) donors, to ensure a sufficient collection of CD34+ cells for allografting. It would be of practical value to be able to identify the patients with poor mobilization on the basis of simple pretreatment clinical or hematologic variables. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Clinical characteristics and laboratory data for 119 normal PBPC donors who underwent apheresis on Days 4 to 6 of treatment with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) were analyzed for correlations with CD34+ cell yield from the first day of apheresis. RESULTS: The CD34+ cell yield was significantly lower in donors who were more than 55 years of age, who underwent apheresis on Day 4 of filgrastim therapy, or who were not obese. There were weak direct correlations between CD34+ cell yield and the baseline white cell count, preapheresis white cell count, and preapheresis mononuclear cell count, and there was a weak inverse correlation with age. Twenty- one donors (18%) were considered to have poor mobilization (< 20 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/L blood processed). In the multivariate analysis, the only significant factor was age greater than 55 years, which conferred a 3.8 times greater risk (95% CI, 1.1-13.7) of poor mobilization (p = 0.04). However, poor mobilization occurred in all age groups, so the predictive value of the model was low. CONCLUSION: Donor variables correlated with CD34+ cell yield only weakly, so no particular clinical characteristic can be used to exclude an individual as a PBPC donor if he or she is otherwise suitable for the apheresis procedure.     

Second mobilization and collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells in healthy donors is associated with lower CD34(+) cell yields

We have retrospectively evaluated the results of two cycles of mobilization and collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) from 46 healthy donors included in the Spanish National Donor Registry. Mobilization involved the administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) at a median dose of 10 microg/kg per day, and apheresis was begun after the fourth dose of G-CSF in both cycles. The median interval between both mobilizations was 187 days (range, 7-1428 days). The incidence and types of side-effects were similar after both donations, with 25 and 26 donors developing some toxicity after the first and second donations, respectively. The median number of CD34(+) cells collected was higher after the first mobilization than after the second (5.15 versus 3.16 x 10(6)/kg, respectively; p = 0.05), and 29 donors yielded fewer CD34(+) cells after the second mobilization (p = 0.018). A lower proportion of donors yielded CD34(+) cell counts >4 x 10(6)/kg after the second cycle than after the first (52% versus 76%, respectively; p = 0.057). Our study shows that second rounds of PBPC collection from normal donors are well tolerated but are associated with a significantly reduced number of CD34(+) cells collected when the same mobilization scheme is used.     

Leukapheresis after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation: a novel approach to harvest a second autograft

BACKGROUND: Autologous peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) are usually collected after the administration of conventional-dose chemotherapy (CDCT) and growth factors. However, there are no data available concerning the collection of PBPCs after high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous hematopoietic transplantation in a larger series. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients (n = 30) underwent leukapheresis for PBPC harvest after CDCT. After HDCT and autografting, the collection of a second PBPC autograft was attempted. RESULTS: Leukapheresis was performed after CDCT in all cases at a median of 118 CD34+ cells per microL (range, 18-589) and resulted in 6.4 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg (range, 1.7-29.0). After HDCT and autografting, 24 patients (80%) underwent secondary leukapheresis, although they had a significantly lower median of peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cells (30/microL; range, 10-171; p < 0.001). In these patients a median of 3.6 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg (range, 1.6-10.1) was collected in the post-transplantation course. In the remaining six patients (20%) with PB CD34+ cells < 10 per microL, no PBPC harvesting was performed. These so-called poor mobilizers had received significantly less CD34+ cells for autologous transplantation than patients with successful post-HDCT mobilization (median, 2.5 x 10(6)/kg [range, 1.7-3.0] vs. 6.5 x 10(6)/kg [range, 3.2-19.6]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Collection of PBPCs is possible in most patients during the recovery phase of hematopoiesis after HDCT plus autografting, and the number of circulating PBPCs may be related to the CD34+ cell dose transfused by the preceding autograft.     

A cell-kinetic model of CD34+ cell mobilization and harvest: development of a predictive algorithm for CD34+ cell yield in PBPC collections

BACKGROUND: Mobilization and homing of PBPCs are still poorly understood. Thus, a sufficient algorithm for the prediction of PBPC yield in apheresis procedures does not yet exist. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The decline of CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood during apheresis and their simultaneous increase in the collection bag were determined in a prospective study of 18 consecutive apheresis procedures. A cell-kinetic, four-compartment model describing these changes was developed. Retrospective data from 136 apheresis procedures served to further improve this model. A predictive algorithm for the yield was developed that considered the sex, weight, and height of the patient, the number of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood before apheresis, the inlet flow, and the duration of the apheresis. The accuracy of this algorithm was evaluated by comparison of the predicted and the observed yields of CD34+ cells in 105 prospective autologous and 148 retrospective allogeneic apheresis procedures. RESULTS: The correlation between predicted and observed yields was good for the autologous and allogeneic groups with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.8979 and 0.8311 (p<0.0001), respectively. The regression is described by the equations log (measured value [m]) = 1.0118 + 0.8595 x log (predicted value [p]) for the autologous and log (m) = 2.226 + 0.7559 x log (p) for the allogeneic group. The respective equations for the zero-point regression are log (m) = 1.014 x log (p) and log (m) = 1.026 x log (p). The probability that the measured value was 90 percent or more of the predicted value was 83.8 percent for the autologous and 90.5 percent for the allogeneic apheresis procedures. CONCLUSION: The predictive accuracy of the algorithm and the slope of the zero-point regression curve were higher for allogeneic than autologous PBPC collections. The predictive algorithm may be a useful tool in PBPC harvest, enabling the adaptation of the size of the apheresis to the needs of each patient.