Role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of multiple colorectal metastases to the liver

BACKGROUND: The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with multiple (five or more) bilobar hepatic metastases irrespective of initial resectability is still under scrutiny. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of hepatectomy alone with that of hepatectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for multiple bilobar hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. METHODS: Retrospective data were collected from 71 patients after hepatectomy for five or more bilobar liver tumours. The outcome of 48 patients treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by hepatectomy was compared with that of 23 patients treated by hepatectomy alone. RESULTS: Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy had better 3- and 5-year survival rates from the time of diagnosis than those who did not (67.0 and 38.9 versus 51.8 and 20.7 per cent respectively; P = 0.039), and required fewer extended hepatectomies (four segments or more) (39 of 48 versus 23 of 23; P = 0.027). Multivariate analysis showed neoadjuvant chemotherapy to be an independent predictor of survival. CONCLUSION: In patients with bilateral multiple colorectal liver metastases, neoadjuvant chemotherapy before hepatectomy was associated with improved survival and enabled complete resection with fewer extended hepatectomies.     

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a treatment strategy for multiple bilobar liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma

Hepatic resection remains the only potentially curative therapy for patients with colorectal liver metastases. Because most have multiple bilobar liver metastases, surgical resection is possible in only 25-58% of patients with colorectal liver metastases. Currently, attention is focused on the potential for neoadjuvant chemotherapy to render formerly unresectable patients resectable. The availability of more efficacious chemotherapy agents and an inventive approach to delivery schedules have resulted in an increase in the number of candidates for hepatic resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Although tumor response varies with regimen and/or route of chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases, with 16-63% tumor response rates, hepatic resection for responders after neoadjuvant chemotherapy gives survival benefits, with 20-48% 5-year survival rates after surgery. Provided that neoadjuvant chemotherapy controls multiple bilobar liver metastases well, aggressive hepatic resection should be considered for patients with those lesions. As a treatment strategy for multiple bilobar liver metastases, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a useful to increase resection rates and may contribute to the improvement of prognosis in patients with such lesions.     

OncoSurge: a strategy for long‐term survival in metastatic colorectal cancer

OncoSurge is a combined modality strategy for the management of colorectal cancer with hepatic metastases. It has emerged as a result of new and expanded patient selection criteria for resectability of metastases, coupled with more effective neoadjuvant and postoperative chemotherapy. By bringing together these developments in surgery and medical oncology, the new approach promises to increase significantly the resectability rate and long‐term survival in colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases. Surgery for colorectal liver metastases should now be considered across a range of clinical circumstances that would historically have been contraindications to resection. These contraindications include multiple or bilobar metastases, large tumour size, a Dukes stage C or poorly differentiated primary tumour, synchronous detection of metastases with the primary tumour, disease in elderly patients, or a resection margin of less than 1 cm. None of these criteria should necessarily exclude a patient from resection, because although they may be associated with a less favourable prognosis they do not exclude the possibility of long‐term survival. Non‐resectable extrahepatic disease and portal lymph node involvement, however, remain contraindications to resection in most circumstances. Retrospective studies of neoadjuvant therapy have indicated that a regimen based on low dose oxaliplatin, 5‐fluorourucil (5‐FU) and leucovorin increased the overall resectability rate of patients presenting with hepatic colorectal metastases from 20% to 30%, with 13.6% of patients with unresectable metastases becoming eligible for curative resection. More recently, studies using more potent oxaliplatin‐based regimens have reported significantly higher resectability rates of at least 40%, with 5‐year survival of 50% reported in one large study among patients whose liver metastases were resected after initial neoadjuvant therapy for unresectable tumours. Following resection, postoperative therapy based on a combination of hepatic artery infusion (HAI) and systemic chemotherapy reduces hepatic recurrence and increases survival, but more potent systemic therapy is required to reduce the rate of extrahepatic recurrence. Studies are now in progress combining HAI with oxaliplatin‐based systemic therapy to address this issue. By combining a more inclusive approach to surgery with more effective neoadjuvant and postoperative chemotherapy, the OncoSurge treatment model is likely to increase significantly the number of patients with hepatic colorectal metastases who can be treated with curative intent, and thus has the potential to improve overall patient survival.     

Treatment strategy for hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer

Over the past 25 years, 125 patients with colorectal liver metastases underwent 167 hepatectomies in our department. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates after the initial hepatectomy were 90%, 58%, and 51%, respectively, and those after repeated hepatectomy were 88%, 60%, and 42%, respectively. The predictive factors significantly associated with poor prognosis after initial hepatectomy were maximal diameter of metastasis (> or = 5 cm), distribution pattern in the liver (multiple bilobar), number of nodules (> or = four), and presence of extrahepatic metastases. A disease-free interval of > 6 months after initial hepatectomy was a significant factor for prolongation of survival after repeat hepatectomy. Patients with hilar node metastases at the initial hepatectomy did not receive a survival benefit from hepatectomy, while 5 patients underwent repeat hepatectomy with lymphadenectomy for remnant liver and hilar node metastases with a disease-free interval of > 8 months and 4 of them survived for > 5 years. Our treatment strategies for colorectal hepatic metastases are as follows: 1) hepatectomy is the first choice for < 4 liver metastases without extrahepatic disease; 2) a careful evaluation for liver resection is performed for patients with > or = 4 liver metastases receiving hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy because of the high frequency of hepatic and/or extrahepatic recurrence after initial hepatectomy; 3) the presence of hilar node metastases at the initial hepatectomy should be excluded from surgical indications; 4) simultaneous single metastasis limited to the lung is an indication for lung resection; and 5) a suitable indication for repeat hepatectomy for hepatic recurrence is patients with a longer disease-free interval. Aggressive surgery based on the optimum patient selection can contribute to clinical benefit, including long-term survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases.     

Liver resection after downstaging with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for "unresectable" colorectal metastases

Hepatic resection is the only treatment that offers a chance of long-term survival in patients with metastases from colorectal cancer. Nevertheless, a curative resection can be performed in only 10-20 per cent of patients: multiple bilobar metastases or "unresectable" disease are the greatest obstacles to surgical radicality. Techniques such as preoperative portal embolisation, preoperative portal ligation, two-stage hepatectomy, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, have extended the possibility of liver surgery to patients with advanced metastatic colorectal cancer. The outcomes of two patients treated successfully with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (one case with FOL-F-OX, and one with FOL-F-IRI) followed by liver resection were analyzed. In both patients neoadjuvant chemotherapy enabled a curative liver resection to be performed without significant complications. In some patients, neoadjuvant chemotherapy permits the "downsizing" of metastatic disease to such an extent that a surgical approach proves feasible. This advance can dramatically improve the prognosis of patients with multiple or unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer.     

Effectiveness of prehepatectomy intra-arterial chemotherapy for multiple bilobar colorectal cancer metastases to the liver: a clinicopathologic study of peritumoral vasculobiliary invasion

BACKGROUND: Consensus remains to be achieved concerning prehepatectomy neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a treatment strategy for multiple bilobar colorectal liver metastases, in part because the effect of prehepatectomy neoadjuvant chemotherapy has not been determined pathologically. We investigated the efficacy of prehepatectomy intra-arterial chemotherapy for multiple bilobar colorectal cancer metastases to the liver. METHODS: Clinicopathologic data for 37 consecutive patients with > or =5 bilobar liver metastases from colorectal cancer who underwent hepatectomy were analyzed retrospectively with respect to long-term outcome and histological findings in resected liver tumors. RESULTS: In the 15 patients receiving neodadjuvant chemotherapy (NEO+ group), liver metastases progressed in 2 patients, remained stable in 8 patients, responded more than 50% in 4 patients, and responded completely in 1 patient (combined response rate, 33.3%). Overall and hepatic recurrence-free survival tended to be higher in responders than in nonresponders ( P = .053). Microscopic invasion of the portal vein, hepatic vein, and bile ducts near liver tumors was less frequent according to use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and responsiveness to the therapy (responders, 20.0%; patients not receiving neoadjuvant therapy [NEO-], 72.7%; P < .05). Such microscopic invasion independently predicted hepatic recurrence by multivariate analysis ( P = .011). CONCLUSIONS: A neoadjuvant chemotherapy-associated decrease in microscopic vasculobiliary invasion by metastatic liver tumors was related to clinical response and favorable outcome.     

Perioperative complications after hepatectomy with or without intra-arterial chemotherapy for bilobar colorectal cancer liver metastases

BACKGROUND: We investigated perioperative complications of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy preceding major hepatectomy for multiple bilobar colorectal cancer metastases. No consensus exists concerning operative feasibility or perioperative course in patients undergoing major liver resection with neoadjuvant chemotherapy--partly because such chemotherapy is considered hepatotoxic, increasing the risk of postoperative liver failure. METHODS: Clinicopathologic data were available for 41 consecutive patients with 5 or more bilobar liver metastases from colorectal cancer who underwent major liver resection with or without prior hepatic arterial chemotherapy. Data concerning operative feasibility, postoperative liver function, complication rates, and histologic findings in the non-neoplastic liver were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Prehepatectomy and postoperative day 1 platelet counts were lower (P < .01 and P < .05), alkaline phosphatase on postoperative day 3 was higher (P < .01), and prothrombin time on day 1 was more prolonged (P < .01) in the chemotherapy group. No significant difference was seen between groups in intraoperative data, morbidity, or duration of hospitalization. Histologic examination of adjacent non-neoplastic liver confirmed mild to severe fatty degeneration in 91% of the patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, compared with 53% in those without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = .023). Although the number of neoplasms in chemotherapy patients was greater than that of the other group, overall and disease-free survival rates were comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite mild postoperative liver dysfunction, pre-resection hepatic arterial chemotherapy did not increase morbidity.     

Treatment for multiple bilobar liver metastases of colorectal cancer

Background Recent advances have extended indications for hepatectomy to include multiple bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Staging systems based on the biological malignancy of primary and metastatic tumors provide appropriate indications for hepatectomy in CLM. However, suitability for resection in patients with complex and extensive hepatic metastases is controversial. Methods A medline search was performed to identify papers reporting the resection for CLM. Techniques, indication, and results were reviewed. Results If the anticipated remnant liver volume is small (25–40% of total), suggesting a high risk of postoperative liver failure, portal vein embolization (PVE) is recommended prior to hepatectomy. However, curative resections are not always possible. Specifically in synchronous multiple bilobar CLM, two-stage hepatectomy, comprising bilateral hepatectomy and primary resection with or without PVE, can prevent growth of ipsilateral metastatic nodules in the remnant liver and reduce surgical risk. Several local ablation techniques can complement surgery if hepatic resection alone increases the risk of postoperative liver failure or is not curative. Chemotherapy combined with targeted treatment can suppress recurrence and extend indications for hepatectomy by reducing the size and number of primary irresectable tumors. Conclusion PVE or staged procedure combining with local ablation or neoadjuvant, downstaging or adjuvant therapies extends indications for hepatectomy to include multiple bilobar CLM. The 5-year survival rate for multiple bilobar CLM treated with alternating hepatectomy and chemotherapy is comparable to the values reported for single and hemilateral CLM.     

Outcome after hepatic resection versus combined resection and microwave ablation for multiple bilobar colorectal metastases to the liver

BACKGROUND: We investigated the efficacy of microwave ablation plus hepatectomy for multiple bilobar colorectal metastases to the liver. No consensus exists concerning local ablation plus hepatic resection for treating multiple bilobar colorectal liver metastases, partly because of a lack of long-term comparative survival data. METHODS: Clinicopathologic data were analyzed retrospectively for 53 consecutive patients with 5 or more bilobar liver metastases from colorectal cancer who underwent hepatectomy with or without microwave ablation. Outcome measures were recurrence rate, recurrence pattern, and survival. RESULTS: Combined resection/ablation was performed more frequently in patients with more liver metastases (P = .03). No significant differences were found for overall, disease-free, or hepatic recurrence-free survival between 16 patients with resection/ablation and 37 patients with resection (P = .43, .54, and .86, respectively). Multivariate analysis selected prehepatectomy carcinoembryonic antigen concentration in serum as an independent prognosticator for survival (P = .02), but not resection/ablation versus resection. In patients with combined resection/ablation, recurrence occurred near the resection or ablation line in only 2 patient (22%), whereas multiple neoplasms (>/=4) was the most common liver recurrence pattern (78%). CONCLUSIONS: Microwave ablation plus hepatic resection expanded indications for operation to treat multiple bilobar liver metastases, with survival similar to that in less-involved hepatic resection patients.     

Predictors of extrahepatic recurrence after resection of colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND: It is important to identify patients at high risk of extrahepatic recurrence after surgery for liver metastases, in order to maximize the survival benefit obtained by prophylactic regional chemotherapy. METHODS: Data from 68 patients who underwent resection of colorectal liver metastases but who did not receive hepatic arterial chemotherapy or intravenous systemic chemotherapy were collected. Twenty-two variables were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses to determine which factors were relevant to extrahepatic recurrence. A scoring system was developed that included the most relevant factors. RESULTS: The extrahepatic recurrence rate at 3 years after hepatectomy was 57.8 per cent. Three variables were independently associated with extrahepatic recurrence including raised serum level of carcinoembryonic antigen after hepatectomy (relative risk (RR) 5.4, P < 0.001), venous invasion of the primary tumour (RR 4.0, P = 0.001) and high-grade budding of the primary tumour (RR 3.1, P = 0.006). Patients with none of these risk factors had a 3-year extrahepatic recurrence rate of 7.1 per cent, compared with 61.6 per cent for those with one risk factor and 100 per cent for those with two or three risk factors. CONCLUSION: It was possible to identify patients at high risk of disease relapse at extrahepatic sites. This system might be used on an individual basis to select patients with colorectal liver metastases for regional chemotherapy or systemic chemotherapy after surgical intervention.     

Staging and indications for hepatectomy in hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer

Factors adversely affecting prognosis after hepatectomy for hepatic metastases include residual tumor, hepatic lymph node metastases, satellite metastases, extrahepatic metastases, four or more hepatic metastases, resection margins of less than 10 mm, and carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 values higher than normal preoperatively and 1 month postoperatively. As no significant differences were observed in terms of the H-number stipulated by the Japanese Classification of Colorectal Carcinoma, a new staging system based on the number of lymph node metastases from the primary lesion, the number of liver metastases number, and the size of metastatic tumors was developed. The proposed staging system appears to be useful in predicting the prognosis of patients with metastatic liver tumors from colorectal cancer. Favorable patient selection criteria for liver resection are: 1) medical fitness for hepatectomy; 2) radical resection of the primary colorectal lesion; 3) metastatic tumors anatomically confined within the liver allowing adequate preservation of the liver parenchyma; 4) no signs of disseminated disease; 5) no signs of hepatic lymph node metastases; 6) four or fewer metastatic tumors; and 7) resection margins of 10 mm or greater. Unilobar or bilobar disease with multiple lesions is not a significant prognostic factor.     

Clinical significance of and future perspectives for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer

The most common site of metastases in patients with colorectal cancer is the liver. Hepatic resection is considered to be the treatment of choice for liver metastasis from colorectal cancer; however, hepatic resection can be performed in only 20 or 25 % of all patients. Recurrence develops in the remnant liver or other organs after hepatic resection in over half of all patients with liver-only metastasis. Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) chemotherapy can provide relatively high concentrations of drugs to microscopic or macroscopic metastases in the liver, with less toxicity than systemic administration. Meta-analyses have shown HAI chemotherapy to have a significantly higher response rate than systemic chemotherapy and its effect on extrahepatic metastases is negligible. HAI chemotherapy provides much better local control of liver metastases from colorectal cancer than systemic chemotherapy. However, well-controlled studies are needed to elucidate the optimal treatment strategies for neoadjuvant and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy that optimally combine HAI chemotherapy, molecular targeted agents, and systemic chemotherapy such as FOLFOX or FOLFIRI.     

术中超声辅助肝切除联合射频消融根治性治疗双叶弥散性结直肠癌肝转移

目的 探索术中超声辅助下肝切除联合射频消融根治性治疗双叶弥散性结直肠癌肝转移的安全性和可行性.方法 2006年1月至2012年1月期间,5例被2名以上专家判断失去手术时机的双叶弥散性结直肠癌肝转移患者,成功实施根治性治疗.其中男2例,女3例.平均年龄57岁 (44～65岁).回顾性分析其手术相关临床指标.结果 术中超声发现肝脏转移病灶平均20.4个 (15～28个),围手术期死亡0例,肝功能衰竭0例.围手术并发症:腹腔感染1例,大量腹水2例,胸腔积液4例.术后1个月影像学检查和血清CEA等证实达到根治性治疗.结论 术中超声辅助下一期肝切除联合射频消融治疗是双叶弥散性结直肠癌肝转移治疗的一种很好的选择,可以提高转移性肝癌的切除率.     

Recurrence and outcomes following hepatic resection, radiofrequency ablation, and combined resection/ablation for colorectal liver metastases

OBJECTIVE: To examine recurrence and survival rates for patients treated with hepatic resection only, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) plus resection or RFA only for colorectal liver metastases. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Thermal destruction techniques, particularly RFA, have been rapidly accepted into surgical practice in the last 5 years. Long-term survival data following treatment of colorectal liver metastasis using RFA with or without hepatic resection are lacking. METHODS: Data from 358 consecutive patients with colorectal liver metastases treated for cure with hepatic resection +/- RFA and 70 patients found at laparotomy to have liver-only disease but not to be candidates for potentially curative treatment were compared (1992-2002). RESULTS: Of 418 patients treated, 190 (45%) underwent resection only, 101 RFA + resection (24%), 57 RFA only (14%), and 70 laparotomy with biopsy only or arterial infusion pump placement ("chemotherapy only," 17%). RFA was used in operative candidates who could not undergo complete resection of disease. Overall recurrence was most common after RFA (84% vs. 64% RFA + resection vs. 52% resection only, P < 0.001). Liver-only recurrence after RFA was fourfold the rate after resection (44% vs. 11% of patients, P < 0.001), and true local recurrence was most common after RFA (9% of patients vs. 5% RFA + resection vs. 2% resection only, P = 0.02). Overall survival rate was highest after resection (58% at 5 years); 4-year survival after resection, RFA + resection and RFA only were 65%, 36%, and 22%, respectively (P < 0.0001). Survival for "unresectable" patients treated with RFA + resection or RFA only was greater than chemotherapy only (P = 0.0017). CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic resection is the treatment of choice for colorectal liver metastases. RFA alone or in combination with resection for unresectable patients does not provide survival comparable to resection, and provides survival only slightly superior to nonsurgical treatment.     

Outcome After Hepatectomy for Multiple (Four or More) Colorectal Metastases in the Era of Effective Chemotherapy

Background Hepatic resection is generally accepted as the only potential for long-term survival in patients with colorectal metastases confined to the liver. Despite an unknown benefit, hepatic resection is playing an increasing role in patients with extensive disease. Methods A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained hepatobiliary surgical database was carried out. Outcome after hepatectomy for four or more colorectal hepatic metastases was reviewed. Results Between 1998 and 2002, out of a total of 584 patients, 98 (17%) with four or more colorectal hepatic metastases were resected. Actuarial 5-year survival was 33% for the entire group, with seven actual 5-year survivors. There were no perioperative deaths, and the perioperative morbidity was 28%. Positive margins and extrahepatic disease resection were independently associated with poor outcome. The median disease-free survival was 12 months, with no actuarial disease-free survivors at 5 years. Recurrence pattern, response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, time to recurrence, and resection of recurrent disease were also associated with outcome. Conclusions Long-term survival can be achieved after resection of multiple colorectal metastases; however, because most patients will experience recurrence of disease, effective adjuvant therapy and close follow-up is necessary.     

Strategies to increase the resectability of liver metastases from colorectal cancer

Liver resection can provide long-term survival and cure for patients with colorectal liver metastases but is feasible in only 15-25% of patients. In the last few years several major developments have contributed to increase this resectability rate. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy can provide response rates as high as 50%, allowing surgery in about 10-15% of patients initially deemed unresectable. Patients requiring extensive liver resections with an anticipated small residual liver volume can undergo portal vein embolization to reduce the risk of postoperative liver failure by inducing hypertrophy of the remnant liver. Extensive bilobar disease can be treated by two-stage hepatectomy, with an interval to allow liver regeneration. Ablation techniques can be combined with hepatic resection to reduce local recurrence from incomplete surgical resection margins or to destroy contralateral tumor deposits. Finally, for patients with tumors involving the inferior vena cava or the hepatic veins, in which conventional resection is not feasible, in situ hypothermia or bench resection with reimplantation are suitable for very selected patients. Downstaging strategies may increase the resectability rate of colorectal liver metastases by over 20%.     

Surgical and combined treatment of multiple and bilobar metastatic affection of the liver

Short- and long-term results of surgical treatment in combination with local exposures (cryo- and thermo-destruction) and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients treated for multiple and bilobar metastatic affection of the liver were studied. Postoperative lethality was 2,5% (n=2) due to liver insufficiency. Specific for liver resection complications (bile outflow, moderate hepatic failure) do not exceed 20,5%. Five-year survival of patients with solitary bilobar metastatic affection of the liver (not more than two foci) was 39,1+/-14,3%. This demonstrates that solitary bilobar hepatic metastases is not a negative prognostic factor for surgical treatment. Long-term results of treatment of patients with multiple metastases of colorectal cancer to the liver are worse, but 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival demonstrates validity of surgical policy in treatment of these patients. Postoperative chemotherapy significantly improves long-term survival of patients with multiple or/and bilobar metastases of colorectal cancer to the liver.     

Extrahepatic disease does not contraindicate hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND: Extrahepatic disease has always been considered an absolute contraindication to hepatectomy for liver metastases. The present study reports the long-term outcome and prognostic factors of patients undergoing resection of extrahepatic disease simultaneously with hepatectomy for liver metastases. METHODS: From January 1987 to January 2001, 111 (30 per cent) of 376 patients who had hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases underwent simultaneous resection of extrahepatic disease with curative intent. RESULTS: Surgery was considered R0 in 77 patients (69 per cent) and palliative (R1 or R2) in 34 patients (31 per cent). The mortality rate was 4 per cent and the morbidity rate 28 per cent. After a median follow-up of 4.9 years, the overall 3- and 5-year survival rates were 38 and 20 per cent respectively. The 5-year overall survival rate of patients with R0 resection only (n = 75) was 29 per cent. The difference in survival between patients with and without extrahepatic disease discovered incidentally at operation was significant, as was the number of liver metastases. CONCLUSION: Extrahepatic disease in patients with colorectal cancer who also have liver metastases should no longer be considered an absolute contraindication to hepatectomy. However, the presence of more than five liver metastases and the incidental intraoperative discovery of extrahepatic disease remain contraindications to hepatic resection.     

Hepatic resections for bilobar liver metastases from colorectal cancer

The present study was performed to assess survival benefits in patients who underwent a hepatic resection for isolated bilobar liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Thirty-eight patients underwent a curative hepatic resection for isolated colorectal liver metastasis. Among them, 11 patients had bilobar liver metastases and 19 had a solitary metastasis. The remaining 8 patients had unilobar multiple lesions. We investigated survival in two groups those with bilobar and those with solitary metastatic tumors. Survival and disease-free survival were 36% and 18% at 5 years, respectively, in the patients with bilobar liver metastases, while these survivals were 43% and 34% in the patients with solitary liver metastasis. In the 38 patients, repeated hepatic resections were performed in 15 patients with recurrent liver disease. The 5-year survival and disease-free survival rates for these patients were 38% and 27%, respectively, after the second hepatic resections. Of the 11 patients with bilobar liver metastases, 5 underwent a repeated hepatic resection, and they all survived for over 42 months. Based on our observations, a hepatic resection was thus found to be effective even in selected patients with either bilobar nodules or recurrence in the remnant liver. Received: February 7, 2000 / Accepted: April 26, 2000     

Liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: assessing the risk of occult irresectable disease

Background: Liver resection is standard therapy for selected patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Extrahepatic metastases and inability to remove all hepatic disease usually preclude curative resection and are the most common contraindications. This study analyzes irresectability in patients considered to have resectable disease taken to operation for potentially curative hepatic resection. We describe preoperative factors associated with irresectability and propose a preoperative scoring system that identifies patients at particularly high risk for occult irresectable disease.Study Design: Patients considered to have resectable hepatic colorectal metastases were identified from a prospective database. Intraoperative findings that precluded liver resection were recorded. Demographic data, characteristics of the primary tumor, and characteristics of the hepatic metastases were recorded and analyzed.Results: From April 1992 through July 1997, 416 patients were explored with the intention of performing a potentially curative liver resection; 329 (79%) were resected. Eighty-seven patients (21%) had apparently resectable tumors on preoperative imaging but irresectable disease at laparotomy. Forty-four patients (51%) had irresectable disease limited to the liver; 32 had extensive bilobar disease not appreciated before surgery, and 12 were not resected for technical or other reasons unrelated to disease extent. Forty-three patients (49%) had extrahepatic disease, 31 of whom had resectable hepatic tumors. Of the several preoperative factors analyzed, only the estimated number of hepatic tumors was an independent predictor of irresectable findings at operation. This held true for patients with extrahepatic metastases and those with extensive hepatic disease. From these data, we devised a preoperative scoring system that estimates the probability of finding occult irresectable disease. Resectability ranged from 95% in patients with a score of 0 (solitary, unilobar) to 62% in those with a score of 3 (multiple, bilobar; p = 0.0001). The predictive value of this scoring system was then validated by applying it prospectively to an additional group of 118 patients taken to surgery for resection; the results were similar.Conclusions: Standard preoperative investigations predicted resectability in 79% of patients with hepatic colorectal metastases. Unresectable disease limited to the liver and extrahepatic disease were seen with nearly equal frequency. The majority of patients with extrahepatic metastases had resectable hepatic disease (31 of 43, 72%). A preoperative scoring system is proposed that identifies patients at high risk for unrecognized irresectable disease and may help focus the use of additional diagnostic modalities such as laparoscopy and positron emission tomography (PET).