An empirical comparison of three different borderline concepts

Forty-six inpatients were independently diagnosed according to the DSM-III concept of borderline personality disorder, the diagnostic interview for borderlines (DIB) and the concept of borderline personality organization, which is linked to Kernbergs structural interview. The interviews were videotaped. Satisfactory inter-rater reliability was demonstrated for the DIB, which furthermore showed high sensitivity and specificity in identifying patients with a clinical DSM-III diagnosis of borderline personality disorder from patients with a other personality disorders or schizophrenic disorders. Discriminant features, demographic profile and earlier treatment history for the patients with a borderline personality disorder are described and discussed. The structural interviews were scored according to a specified format. Inter-rater reliability was satisfactory but not too impressive. Borderline personality organization turned out to be a very broad concept and only half of the patients within this concept received a syndrome diagnosis of borderline personality disorder. A general conclusion was that borderline personality organization should not be considered as a diagnostic entity but rather as a different diagnostic dimension representing an intermediate level of personality structure.     

Diagnosis of the borderline disorders

Only a few of the borderline concepts introduced in clinical psychiatry have adequate diagnostic reliability. They are the borderline personality disorder of Gunderson and of DSM-III and the schizotypal personality disorder of DSM-III. Diagnostic interviews for these disorders have been developed, and their features are discussed. The diagnosis of borderline disorder can also be made with self-report instruments which are presented. Basic prevalence and demographic data for these disorders are given. The delimitation of the borderline disorders from other personality disorders is a major diagnostic problem still unresolved. The method of differentiated weight for symptoms is discussed as a probable solution for this problem.     

Are there differences between borderline and other personality disorders?

Summary Using the method of blind retrospective evaluation of clinical records, 26 DSM-III borderline and 27 DSM-III nonborderline personality disorders were compared. Apart from the younger age of borderline patients, no really important differences emerged between the groups in the sociodemographic and clinical variables studied. It is possible that differences between borderline and nonborderline personality disorders are limited to the different phenomenology as defined by the respective diagnostic criteria. The borderline diagnosis proves to be a workable tool for further explorations, although its clinical justification remains to be demonstrated.     

Sex distribution of DSM-III personality disorders in psychiatric outpatients

The author determined the sex distribution of 170 outpatients with a DSM-III diagnosis of personality disorder measured by standardized instruments and compared his findings with DSM-III predictions. They confirmed the prediction of more women diagnosed as having histrionic personality disorder and more men diagnosed as having paranoid, compulsive, and antisocial personality disorders. The predicted excess of women diagnosed as having borderline and dependent personality disorders was not confirmed.     

Structured interviews for borderline personality disorder

The authors compared three instruments used to diagnose borderline personality disorder--the Diagnostic Interview for Borderline Patients (DIB), the Schedule for Interviewing Borderlines, and the Structured Interview for DSM-III Personality Disorders--in 56 patients with personality disorders. A borderline diagnosis was made according to the DIB in 30%, the Structured Interview for DSM-III Personality Disorders in 48%, and the Schedule for Interviewing Borderlines in 55% of the patients. Diagnostic agreement was only 52%, which has implications for the generalizability of results of validation studies of the borderline diagnosis. Improvement in diagnostic agreement requires modification of current criteria sets and/or the use of dimensional models.     

Personality and personality disorders among patients with major depression in combination with dysthymic or cyclothymic disorders

Personality traits and personality disorders in 298 consecutive outpatients with pure major depression, major depression with dysthymic or cyclothymic disorder, pure dysthymic or cyclothymic disorder and other disorders were investigated. Patients with dysthymic or cyclothymic disorders alone or in combination with major depression showed more self-doubt, insecurity, sensitivity, compliance, rigidity and emotional instability. They were more schizoid, schizotypal, borderline and avoidant according to MCMI and had a higher prevalence of DSM-III Axis II diagnoses, and more borderline, avoidant, and passive-aggressive personality disorders, as measured by SIDP. All in all, dramatic and anxious clusters of personality disorders were more frequent among patients with dysthymic-cyclothymic disorders in addition to major depression than among patients with major depression only. The findings elucidated the close connection between the more chronic affective disorders and the personality disorders, irrespective of any concomitant diagnosis of major depression.     

Prototypicality ratings of DSM-III criteria for personality disorders

Although DSM-III personality disorder criteria have demonstrated acceptable reliability, the question of validity has not been adequately addressed. A first step in establishing the validity of diagnoses is to establish the validity of the criteria used to assess each diagnosis. The content validity of diagnostic criteria was investigated in relation to the larger set of potential criteria culled from the psychiatric literature. For each DSM-III axis II diagnosis, a panel of clinicians rated how prototypical each potential criterion was of the diagnosis in question. The results reveal problems with the organization and content of the criteria for most diagnoses. Many DSM-III criteria are composed of several statements linked by conjunctions or disjunctions. These component statements often received markedly different ratings, suggesting that criteria should be single statements. For most diagnoses, traits not included in DSM-III received higher ratings than did some DSM-III criteria. Suggestions are made to improve the distinctiveness and content validity of paranoid, schizoid, antisocial, borderline, avoidant, dependent, and compulsive personality disorders. The results for schizotypal personality disorder suggest that many clinicians are uncertain about this diagnosis. These findings provide a systematic way to modify definitions that contrasts with the more arbitrary ways in which diagnoses have previously been defined and redefined.     

DSM-III and the diagnosis of schizophrenia

In order to achieve more understanding of the diagnosis of schizophrenia, particularly as it relates to DSM-III, a historical review of influential diagnostic systems is undertaken. It is noted which systems are most relevant to DSM-III and which systems DSM-III neglects. With this in mind, strengths and weaknesses of DSM-III are discussed. Although DSM-III provides a precise, reliable, and research-oriented system, it does not provide construct validity, identifies only the most chronic schizophrenics, does not provide either genetic or psychodynamic understanding, and implies therapeutic nihilism. A conclusion is reached, that, regarding the diagnosis of schizophrenia, DSM-III provides diagnostic criteria that are simply arbitrary and of no more use than a number of other systems.     

Reliability of criteria for borderline personality disorder: a comparison of DSM-III and the Diagnostic Interview for Borderline Patients

The authors compared the reliability of two methods of distinguishing borderline personality disorder--DSM-III and the Diagnostic Interview for Borderline Patients. The reference group, outpatients with other personality disorders and without major axis I pathology, was more difficult to distinguish from the patients with borderline personality disorder than such groups used in previous samples. The sensitivity and specificity of the Diagnostic Interview for Borderline Patients were calculated, with DSM-III used as a criterion. The findings confirm considerable overlap between borderline and schizotypal personality disorders, more impairment in functioning in borderline patients than in those with other personality disorders, and the high reliability with which borderline personality disorder can be diagnosed.     

The amphetamine challenge test in patients with borderline disorder

The authors used amphetamine as a psychopharmacological probe to investigate the hypothesis that patients with borderline personality disorder are prone to psychosis following ingestion of a dopamine agonist. Sixteen patients with borderline personality disorder participated in the study. Significant increases in the mean total Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale scores and in activation and thought disturbance factors after amphetamine administration were noted in the sample. Patients with diagnoses of both schizotypal and borderline personality disorders worsened transiently with amphetamine administration, but patients with only the borderline diagnosis improved. These results indicate the usefulness of pharmacological probes to further understand DSM-III axis II disorders.     

DSM-III personality disorders in opiate addicts

Using the new DSM-III criteria for personality disorders, the rates of these disorders were evaluated in opiate addicts applying for treatment. Consistent with previous studies, 68% of the sample met diagnostic criteria for a personality disorder. Contrary to older theories of an “addictive personality,” a range of personality disorders was found and 24% of the addicts met the criteria for multiple personality disorders. To compare addicts with differing personality patterns, the eleven DSM-III personality disorders were categorized into five mutually exclusive groups: antisocial (39%), borderline (14%), narcissistic (9%), other personality disorder (6%) and no personality disorder (32%). Addicts in these groups differed demographically and in distributions of concurrent psychiatric diagnoses.     

Substance use in borderline personality disorder

The authors investigated the prevalence of substance abuse in 137 inpatients with DSM-III borderline personality disorder. Ninety-two (67%) of these patients were given DSM-III substance use disorder diagnosis. The most frequently used substances were alcohol and sedative-hypnotics. When substance abuse was not used as a diagnostic criterion for borderline personality disorder, 32 (23%) of the 137 patients no longer met borderline criteria. These patients differed significantly from the rest of the patients in severity and course of illness. These data suggest that there might be a subgroup of borderline patients for whom substance use plays a primary role in the development of borderline psychopathology.     

Psychodynamic features in borderline personality disorder identified by a subliminal test, the Defense Mechanism Test

Twenty-seven psychiatric inpatients, diagnosed according to DSM-III and the Diagnostic Interview for Borderline (DIB), and 7 healthy controls were tested with the Defense Mechanism Test (DMT), a test of subliminal perception based on psychoanalytic theory. In the test a specific stimulus is presented subliminally in a tachistoscope and the patient's perceptual distortions are registered. Patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) were compared with patients with other personality disorders, patients with schizophrenic disorders and healthy controls. Specific perceptual distortions were identified among patients with BPD. Some individual DMT signs correlated with some deviant behaviors as identified by the DIB. The findings supported the psychodynamic validity of the concept of borderline personality disorder. It is concluded that DMT is a promising research instrument that provides an empirical approach to crucial psychodynamic phenomena.     

The validity of DSM-III borderline personality disorder. A phenomenologic, family history, treatment response, and long-term follow-up study

To test the validity of the DSM-III diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD), we examined the phenomenology, family history, treatment response, and four-to-seven-year long-term outcome of a cohort of 33 patients meeting DSM-III criteria for BPD. We found that (1) BPD could be distinguished readily from DSM-III schizophrenia; (2) BPD did not appear to represent "borderline affective disorder," although many patients displayed BPD and major affective disorder concomitantly; and (3) BPD could not be distinguished on any of the indices from histrionic and antisocial personality disorders.     

Borderline children: a closer look at diagnosis and treatment

In a follow-up study, children who met research criteria for childhood borderline personality disorder were examined for vulnerability to the affective, personality, and anxiety disorders as defined in DSM-III. In addition to provisional borderline, antisocial, or schizotypal personality diagnoses, many subjects had chronic affective conditions, the symptoms of which resembled those typically associated with borderline personality disorder.     

Comparison between personality disorder diagnoses in DSM-III and DSM-III-R: reliability, diagnostic overlap, predictive validity

97 nonpsychotic consecutive day patients were diagnosed by the axis 1 and 2 in the DSM-III and DSM-III-R system, and their treatment response during their stay was measured by the Health Sickness Rating Scale. The interrater reliability was equally good for both diagnostic systems. On axis 1, there were only minor differences between DSM-III and DSM-III-R. On axis 2, the frequency of schizotypal disorder was reduced by 40% and the frequency of histrionic disorder by two-thirds. The number of schizoid disorders increased from zero to five. Of the DSM-III schizotypals who lost this diagnosis in DSM-III-R (n = 8), 4 got a new diagnosis of schizoid personality and 4 maintained their borderline diagnoses. In DSM-III-R there was a sharper demarcation between patients with severe and nonsevere personality disorder with regard to treatment outcome, indicating an increased validity of these categories. There was also a sharper demarcation between borderline versus histrionic and schizotypal, and between schizotypal and schizoid diagnoses.     

A comparison of DSM-III personality disorders in panic/agoraphobia and obsessive-compulsive disorder

One hundred eighty-seven patients meeting DSM-III criteria for panic disorder (161 with agoraphobia) and 51 patients meeting DSM-III criteria for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) were assessed with the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire (PDQ), a self-rating scale designed to assess axis II personality disorders and traits. The results showed that the personality profiles were similar between the two diagnostic groups and that the major personality characteristics identified in panic/agoraphobic patients, e.g., avoidant, dependent, histrionic, and borderline, were more pronounced in patients with OCD. These findings support our earlier suggestion of a nonspecific link between panic disorder/agoraphobia and personality disorder (PD)/traits.     

The effects of changing axis II diagnostic criteria.

This study examined whether changes in diagnostic criteria from the DSM-III to the DSM-III for personality disorders (PDs) had the intended effects. Seventy-two subjects at the University of Iowa from three research studies and one clinical sample were administered two structured interviews (the Structured Interview for DSM-III Personality [SIDP] and the revised SIDP [SIDP-R]) to assess DSM-III and DSM-III-R criteria. Major changes in rates of diagnoses were observed between the DSM-III and DSM-III-R criteria with kappas for agreement ranging between -.025 and .571. As expected, the switch from monothetic to polythetic definitions had an effect on which patients were assigned a given diagnosis. However, not all of the other revisions associated with the DSM-III-R had the intended effects. For instance, the frequency of the diagnosis of schizoid PD did not increase, nor did the overlap between borderline and histrionic PDs decrease. In addition, there was an unintended increase in the rate of paranoid PD. An analysis of individual criteria showed how small, apparently minor changes in the wording of criteria can sometimes have major effects on which patients received a diagnosis of PD.     

Overlap between borderline and schizotypal personality disorders.

Borderline personality was split into two diagnostic categories in DSM-III: borderline personality disorder (BPD) and schizotypal personality disorder (SPD). There remains a great deal of diagnostic overlap between these two categories despite modifications in DSM-III-R. This report discusses four possible hypotheses for this overlap: (1) an independent, random association; (2) artifactual overlap due to imperfections in the criteria sets; (3) a synergistic association of the two personality disorders; and (4) a manifestation of dimensional psychopathology. Empirical evidence for each of the first three hypotheses is weak and contradictory. Recent biologic and treatment studies appear to most strongly support the use of dimensional models of "borderline" and "schizotypal" personality traits.     

Personality disorders in the public sector

Using a clinical data base for New York state hospitals, the authors examined the prevalence of DSM-III axis II personality disorders in state hospital patients and explored the patterns of comorbidity between axis I and axis II disorders. They found that 11 percent of the patients received a diagnosis of personality disorder and that these patients were more likely than other patients to have a primary diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, major affective disorder, dysthymia, and substance use disorder other than alcoholism. Comparison of state hospital data with data from nonstate facilities showed different patterns of coexisting primary diagnoses and personality disorders and a much higher frequency of borderline personality disorder in nonstate patients. Based on the low percentage of state hospital patients diagnosed as having personality disorders, the authors conclude that axis II disorders are underreported in state facilities.