Rapamycin and CTLA4Ig Synergize to Induce Stable Mixed Chimerism Without the Need for CD40 Blockade

The mixed chimerism approach achieves donor‐specific tolerance in organ transplantation, but clinical use is inhibited by the toxicities of current bone marrow (BM) transplantation (BMT) protocols. Blocking the CD40:CD154 pathway with anti‐CD154 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) is exceptionally potent in inducing mixed chimerism, but these mAbs are clinically not available. Defining the roles of donor and recipient CD40 in a murine allogeneic BMT model, we show that CD4 or CD8 activation through an intact direct or CD4 T cell activation through the indirect pathway is sufficient to trigger BM rejection despite CTLA4Ig treatment. In the absence of CD4 T cells, CD8 T cell activation via the direct pathway, in contrast, leads to a state of split tolerance. Interruption of the CD40 signals in both the direct and indirect pathway of allorecognition or lack of recipient CD154 is required for the induction of chimerism and tolerance. We developed a novel BMT protocol that induces mixed chimerism and donor‐specific tolerance to fully mismatched cardiac allografts relying on CD28 costimulation blockade and mTOR inhibition without targeting the CD40 pathway. Notably, MHC‐mismatched/minor antigen‐matched skin grafts survive indefinitely whereas fully mismatched grafts are rejected, suggesting that non‐MHC antigens cause graft rejection and split tolerance.     

Aggressive skin allograft rejection in CD28-/- mice independent of the CD40/CD40L costimulatory pathway.

CD28-/- mice have been utilized to study the role of B7/CD28 and B7-CTLA4 interactions. There is evidence that CTLA4 ligation may be critical for tolerance induction. The aim of the current study is to further investigate rejection responses of CD28-/- mice and to define the role of B7-CTLA4 interactions in the absence of the CD40 and CD28 pathways. Balb/c skin allografts were transplanted onto C57BL/6 (B6) wild type or CD28-/- mice treated with anti-CD40L, CTLA4-Ig, or combination blockade. To investigate the cellular mechanism of rejection in CD28-/- recipients, mice were treated with anti-CD4 or anti-CD8 antibodies prior to treatment with costimulation blockade. The fluoroscein dye CFSE was utilized to study T cell expansion in vivo. Surprisingly, treatment of B6 CD28-/- mice with CTLA4-Ig alone (MST 12d), anti-CD40L alone (MST 13d), or combined blockade (MST 13d) had no effect on allograft survival compared to untreated B6 CD28 mice (MST 11d). CD28-/- recipients depleted of CD4+ cells and treated with CTLA4-Ig, anti-CD40L, or combination blockade also did not have prolonged survival compared with untreated mice (MST 10d). In contrast, CD28-/- recipients depleted of CD8+ cells had markedly prolonged allograft survival when treated with either anti-CD40L alone (MST 49d) or with combination blockade (MST 57d). Studies utilizing CFSE demonstrated that CD28-/- CD8+ T cells are not defective in in vivo proliferation responses compared with wild type CD8 cells. Thus, CD28-/- CD8+ T cells are responsible for aggressive rejection responses of CD28-/- mice independent of the CD40 pathway. In addition, CD40L blockade does not result in CD4+ T cell tolerance in CD28 recipients, despite an intact B7-CTLA4 pathway.     

Inability to Induce Tolerance Through Direct Antigen Presentation

Both the direct and indirect antigen presentation pathways are important mechanisms for T cell-mediated allograft rejection. Studies using knockout mice and monoclonal antibodies have demonstrated that CD4+ T cells are both necessary and sufficient for the rejection of allogeneic tissues, including skin, heart, and islet. Furthermore, combined blockade of the CD28/B7 and CD154/CD40 costimulatory pathways induces tolerance in multiple CD4+ T-cell dependent allograft models. In this study, we addressed the T-cell requirement for costimulation in direct antigen presentation. We demonstrated that class II-specific alloreactive T-cell receptor transgenic T cells were sufficient to mediate allograft rejection independent of costimulatory blockade. Analysis of the costimulatory capacity of different antigen presenting cell (APC) populations demonstrated that APCs resident within the donor skin, Langerhans cells, are potent stimulators not requiring CD28- or CD154-dependent costimulation for direct major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigen presentation. These results complement previous work examining the role of costimulation on CD8+ T cells, supporting a model in which the effectiveness of costimulatory blockade in the setting of transplantation may be selective for the indirect pathway of MHC alloantigen presentation.     

An MHC‐Defined Primate Model Reveals Significant Rejection of Bone Marrow After Mixed Chimerism Induction Despite Full MHC Matching

In murine models, mixed hematopoietic chimerism induction leads to robust immune tolerance. However, translation to primates and to patients has been difficult. In this study, we used a novel MHC‐defined rhesus macaque model to examine the impact of MHC matching on the stability of costimulation blockade‐/sirolimus‐mediated chimerism, and to probe possible mechanisms of bone marrow rejection after nonmyeloablative transplant. Using busulfan‐based pretransplant preparation and maintenance immunosuppression with sirolimus, as well as CD28 and CD154 blockade, all recipients demonstrated donor engraftment after transplant. However, the mixed chimerism that resulted was compartmentalized, with recipients demonstrating significantly higher whole blood chimerism compared to T cell chimerism. Thus, the vast majority of T cells presenting posttransplant were recipient—rather than donor‐derived. Surprisingly, even in MHC‐matched transplants, rejection of donor hematopoiesis predominated after immunosuppression withdrawal. Weaning of immunosuppression was associated with a surge of antigen‐experienced T cells, and transplant rejection was associated with the acquisition of donor‐directed T cell alloreactivity. These results suggest that a reservoir of alloreactive cells was present despite prior costimulation blockade and sirolimus, and that the postimmunosuppression lymphocytic rebound may have lead to a phenotypic shift in these recipient T cells towards an activated, antigen‐experienced phenotype, and ultimately, to transplant rejection.     

Different Mechanisms Control Peripheral and Central Tolerance in Hematopoietic Chimeric Mice

Regulatory T cells (Treg) are important in peripheral tolerance, but their role in establishing and maintaining hematopoietic mixed chimerism and generating central tolerance is unclear. We now show that costimulation blockade using a donor‐specific transfusion and anti‐CD154 antibody applied to mice given bone marrow and simultaneously transplanted with skin allografts leads to hematopoietic chimerism and permanent skin allograft survival. Chimeric mice bearing intact skin allografts fail to generate effector/memory T cells against allogeneic targets as shown by the absence of IFNγ‐producing CD44^highCD8⁺ T cells and in vivo cytotoxicity. Depletion of Tregs by injection of anti‐CD4 or anti‐CD25 antibody prior to costimulation blockade prevents chimerism, shortens skin allograft survival and leads to generation of effector/memory cytotoxic T cells. Depletion of Tregs by injection of anti‐CD4 or anti‐CD25 antibody two months after transplantation leads to loss of skin allografts even though mice remain chimeric and exhibit little in vivo cytotoxicity. In contrast, chimerism is lost, but skin allografts survive following naïve T‐cell injection. We conclude that hematopoietic chimerism and peripheral tolerance may be maintained by different mechanisms in mixed hematopoietic chimeras.     

Anti‐LFA‐1 or rapamycin overcome costimulation blockade‐resistant rejection in sensitized bone marrow recipients

While costimulation blockade‐based mixed chimerism protocols work well for inducing tolerance in rodents, translation to preclinical large animal/nonhuman primate models has been less successful. One recognized cause for these difficulties is the high frequency of alloreactive memory T cells (Tmem) found in the (pre)clinical setting as opposed to laboratory mice. In the present study, we therefore developed a murine bone marrow transplantation (BMT) model employing recipients harboring polyclonal donor‐reactive Tmem without concomitant humoral sensitization. This model was then used to identify strategies to overcome this additional immune barrier. We found that B6 recipients that were enriched with 3 × 10⁷ T cells isolated from B6 mice that had been previously grafted with Balb/c skin, rejected Balb/c BM despite costimulation blockade with anti‐CD40L and CTLA4Ig (while recipients not enriched developed chimerism). Adjunctive short‐term treatment of sensitized BMT recipients with rapamycin or anti‐LFA‐1 mAb was demonstrated to be effective in controlling Tmem in this model, leading to long‐term mixed chimerism and donor‐specific tolerance. Thus, rapamycin and anti‐LFA‐1 mAb are effective in overcoming the potent barrier that donor‐reactive Tmem pose to the induction of mixed chimerism and tolerance despite costimulation blockade.     

Murine Mobilized Peripheral Blood Stem Cells Have a Lower Capacity than Bone Marrow to Induce Mixed Chimerism and Tolerance

Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) under costimulation blockade allows induction of mixed chimerism and tolerance without global T‐cell depletion (TCD). The mildest such protocols without recipient cytoreduction, however, require clinically impracticable bone marrow (BM) doses. The successful use of mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) instead of BM in such regimens would provide a substantial advance, allowing transplantation of higher doses of hematopoietic donor cells. We thus transplanted fully allogeneic murine granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF) mobilized PBSC under costimulation blockade (anti‐CD40L and CTLA4Ig). Unexpectedly, PBSC did not engraft, even when very high cell doses together with nonmyeloablative total body irradiation (TBI) were used. We show that, paradoxically, T cells contained in the donor PBSC triggered rejection of the transplanted donor cells. Rejection of donor BM was also triggered by the cotransplantation of unmanipulated donor T cells isolated from naïve (nonmobilized) donors. Donor‐specific transfusion and transient immunosuppression prevented PBSC‐triggered rejection and mixed chimerism and tolerance were achieved, but graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) occurred. The combination of in vivo TCD with costimulation blockade prevented rejection and GVHD. Thus, if allogeneic PBSC are transplanted instead of BM, costimulation blockade alone does not induce chimerism and tolerance without unacceptable GVHD‐toxicity, and the addition of TCD is required for success.     

The role of natural killer T cells in costimulation blockade‐based mixed chimerism

Distinct lymphocyte populations have been identified that either promote or impede the establishment of chimerism and tolerance through allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Natural killer T (NKT) cells have pleiotropic regulatory properties capable of either augmenting or downmodulating various immune responses. We investigated in this study whether NKT cells affect outcome in mixed chimerism models employing fully mismatched nonmyeloablative BMT with costimulation blockade (CB). The absence of NKT cells had no detectable effect on chimerism or skin graft tolerance after conditioning with 3Gy total body irradiation (TBI), and a limited positive effect with 1Gy TBI. Stimulation of NKT cells with alpha‐galactosylceramide (alpha‐gal) at the time of BMT prevented chimerism and tolerance. Activation of recipient (as opposed to donor) NKT cells was necessary and sufficient for the alpha‐gal effect. The detrimental effect of NKT activation was also observed in the absence of T cells after conditioning with in vivo T‐cell depletion (TCD). NKT cells triggered rejection of BM via NK cells as chimerism and tolerance were not abrogated when NKT cells were stimulated in the absence of both NK cells and T cells. Thus, activation of NKT cells at the time of BMT overcomes the effects of CB, inhibiting the establishment of chimerism and tolerance.     

Mechanisms Involved in the Establishment of Tolerance Through Costimulatory Blockade and BMT: Lack of Requirement for CD40L-Mediated Signaling for Tolerance or Deletion of Donor-reactive CD4+ Cells

We have previously shown that high levels of multiline-age mixed hematopoietic chimerism and systemic T-cell tolerance can be achieved in mice without myeloablation through the use of anti-CD40L and costimulatory blockade alone (plus CTLA4Ig) or with recipient CD8 depletion and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Chimeric mice permanently accept donor skin grafts (> 100 days), and rapidly reject third-party grafts. The mechanisms by which costimulatory blockade facilitates the engraftment of allogeneic hematopoietic cells have not been defined. To further understand the in vivo mechanisms by which the administration of anti-CD40L mAb facilitates the engraftment of donor bone marrow and rapidly tolerizes CD4+ T cells, we analyzed the establishment of chimerism and tolerance in CD40L -/- mice. We demonstrate here that anti-CD40L mAb treatment is required only to prevent CD40L/CD40 interactions, and that no signal to the T cell through CD40L is necessary for the induction of CD4+ tolerance. Peripheral deletion of donor-reactive CD4+ T cells occurs rapidly in CD40L -/- mice receiving bone marrow transplantation (BMT), indicating that this deletion in the presence of anti-CD40L is not due to targeting of activated CD4+ cells by the antibody. Complete CD4+ cell tolerance is observed by both skin graft acceptance and in vitro assays before deletion is complete, indicating that additional mechanisms play a role in inducing CD4+ T-cell tolerance as the result of BMT in the presence of CD40/CD40L blockade.     

Combined Anti‐CD154/CTLA4Ig Costimulation Blockade‐Based Therapy Induces Donor‐Specific Tolerance to Vascularized Osteomyocutaneous Allografts

Tolerance induction by means of costimulation blockade has been successfully applied in solid organ transplantation; however, its efficacy in vascularized composite allotransplantation, containing a vascularized bone marrow component and thus a constant source of donor‐derived stem cells, remains poorly explored. In this study, osteomyocutaneous allografts (alloOMCs) from Balb/c (H2^d) mice were transplanted into C57BL/6 (H2^b) recipients. Immunosuppression consisted of 1 mg anti‐CD154 on day 0, 0.5 mg CTLA4Ig on day 2 and rapamycin (RPM; 3 mg/kg per day from days 0–7, then every other day for 3 weeks). Long‐term allograft survival, donor‐specific tolerance and donor–recipient cell trafficking were evaluated. Treatment with costimulation blockade plus RPM resulted in long‐term graft survival (>120 days) of alloOMC in 12 of 15 recipients compared with untreated controls (median survival time [MST] ≈10.2 ± 0.8 days), RPM alone (MST ≈33 ± 5.5 days) and costimulation blockade alone (MST ≈45.8 ± 7.1 days). Donor‐specific hyporesponsiveness in recipients with viable grafts was demonstrated in vitro. Evidence of donor‐specific tolerance was further assessed in vivo by secondary donor‐specific skin graft survival and third‐party graft rejection. A significant increase of Foxp3⁺ regulatory T cells was evident in tolerant animals. Donor cells populated peripheral blood, thymus, and both donor and recipient bone marrow. Consequently, combined anti‐CD154/CTLA4Ig costimulation blockade‐based therapy induces donor‐specific tolerance in a stringent murine alloOMC transplant model.     

CTLA4Ig promotes the induction of hematopoietic chimerism and tolerance independently of Indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase

Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) under costimulation blockade induces mixed chimerism and tolerance in rodent models. Recent data, predominantly from in vitro studies, suggest that in addition to blocking the CD28 costimulation pathway CTLA4Ig also acts through upregulating the tryptophan-catabolizing enzyme indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase (IDO). Here we demonstrate that even though CTLA4Ig is critically required for the induction of chimerism and tolerance in a murine model of nonmyeloablative BMT, IDO activity is not. No significant differences were detectable in the kynurenine to tryptophan ratios (indicative of IDO activity) in sera of BMT recipients treated with CTLA4Ig (tolerant group) versus BMT recipients treated without CTLA4Ig (nontolerant group) versus na?ve controls. In vivo inhibition of IDO immediately after BMT with CTLA4Ig or several months thereafter did not block achievement of chimerism and tolerance. Thus, IDO does not play a critical role in the induction or maintenance of chimerism and tolerance in a CTLA4Ig-based BMT model.     

Earlier Low-Dose TBI or DST Overcomes CD8+ T-Cell-Mediated Alloresistance to Allogeneic Marrow in Recipients of Anti-CD40L

Treatment with a single injection of anti-CD40L (CD154) monoclonal antibody (mAb) and fully mismatched allogeneic bone marrow transplant (BMT) allows rapid tolerization of CD4+ T cells to the donor. The addition of in vivo CD8 T-cell depletion leads to permanent mixed hematopoietic chimerism and tolerance. We now describe two approaches that obviate the requirement for CD8 T-cell depletion by rapidly tolerizing recipient CD8 T cells in addition to CD4 cells. Administration of donor-specific transfusion (DST) to mice receiving 3 Gy total body irradiation (TBI), BMT and anti-CD40L mAb on day 0 uniformly led to permanent mixed chimerism and tolerance, compared with only 40% of mice receiving similar treatment without DST. In the absence of DST, moving the timing of 3 Gy TBI to day -1 or day -2 instead of day 0 led to rapid (by 2 weeks) induction of CD8+ cell tolerance, and also permitted uniform achievement of permanent mixed chimerism and donor-specific tolerance in recipients of anti-CD40L and BMT on day 0. These nontoxic regimens overcome CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell-mediated alloresistance without requiring host T-cell depletion, permitting the induction of permanent mixed chimerism and tolerance.     

Lack of Role for CsA-Sensitive or Fas Pathways in the Tolerization of CD4 T Cells Via BMT and Anti-CD40L

Anti-CD40L mAb plus bone marrow transplantation (BMT) and recipient CD8 T-cell depletion permits long-term mixed hematopoietic chimerism and systemic donor-specific tolerance to be achieved across full MHC barriers. Initial tolerance is characterized by peripheral deletion of donor-reactive CD4 cells. In regimens using costimulatory blockade without BMT to achieve allograft survival, cyclosporine inhibited graft survival, suggesting that the combination may not be clinically applicable. We assessed the role of cyclosporine-sensitive mechanisms and the mechanisms of T-cell apoptosis involved in the induction of early peripheral CD4+ T-cell tolerance by BMT with anti-CD40L. Neither a short course of cyclosporine (14 days) nor the absence of FAS-mediated activation-induced cell death (AICD) blocked the induction or maintenance of donor-specific tolerance. IL-2 production was not associated with tolerance induction, consistent with the lack of a role for Fas-mediated AICD. Mice in which passive T-cell death was impaired because of constitutive expression of a Bcl-xL transgene did not develop tolerance with this protocol. These data confirm that deletion of donor-reactive T cells is critical for the induction of mixed chimerism and tolerance. However, the mechanisms involved may differ from those involved in costimulatory blockade regimens that do not include BMT.     

CD8+ T‐Cell Depletion and Rapamycin Synergize with Combined Coreceptor/Stimulation Blockade to Induce Robust Limb Allograft Tolerance in Mice

The growing development of composite tissue allografts (CTA) highlights the need for tolerance induction protocols. Herein, we developed a mouse model of heterotopic limb allograft in a stringent strain combination in which potentially tolerogenic strategies were tested taking advantage of donor stem cells in the grafted limb. BALB/c allografts were transplanted into C57BL/6 mice treated with anti‐CD154 mAb, nondepleting anti‐CD4 combined to either depleting or nondepleting anti‐CD8 mAbs. Some groups received additional rapamycin. Both depleting and nondepleting mAb combinations without rapamycin only delayed limb allograft rejection, whereas the addition of rapamycin induced long‐term allograft survival in both combinations. Nevertheless, robust donor‐specific tolerance, defined by the acceptance of a fresh donor‐type skin allograft and simultaneous rejection of third‐party grafts, required initial CD8⁺ T‐cell depletion. Mixed donor‐recipient chimerism was observed in lymphoid organs and recipient bone marrow of tolerant but not rejecting animals. Tolerance specificity was confirmed by the inability to produce IL‐2, IFN‐γ and TNF‐α in MLC with donor antigen while significant alloreactivity persisted against third‐ party alloantigens. Collectively, these results show that robust CTA tolerance and mixed donor‐recipient chimerism can be achieved in response to the synergizing combination of rapamycin, transient CD8⁺ T‐cell depletion and costimulation/coreceptor blockade.     

A more selective costimulatory blockade of the CD28‐B7 pathway

Progress from the last decade in the understanding of T‐cell activation has led to new immunotherapeutic strategies for the treatment of immunological diseases. Since the discovery of costimulatory molecules in the 1980s, the field of T‐cell costimulation blockade has literally exploded and now spanned ‘from bench to bedside’. Such alternative therapies result in more selective effects specializing their action on Ag‐experienced T lymphocytes. This can potentially prevent the progression of autoimmune diseases, allograft rejection and may even induce immune tolerance. In the 1990s, the CD28/B7/CTLA‐4 pathway was identified as a crucial regulator of T‐cell activation and tolerance induction. Here, we have summarized our current understanding of this complex costimulatory pathway involving co‐stimulatory and co‐inhibitory molecules and the way we can manipulate these molecules to inhibit, stimulate or kill target cells in experimental preclinical models as well as in clinical trials. We have also reviewed the role of costimulation in the biology of CD4+ CD25+ Foxp3+ regulatory T cells.     

FasL is important in costimulation blockade-resistant skin graft rejection

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous blockade of the CD40 and CD28 costimulatory pathways is effective in prolonging allograft survival in murine and primate models. Recent data suggest that intact apoptotic pathways are crucial for the induction of hyporesponsiveness by costimulation blockade. We have studied the impact of fas/fasL signaling, an important T cell apoptotic pathway, on the effects of costimulation blockade. Methods. Wild type, lpr (fas deficient), and gld (fasL deficient), mice were used as donors and recipients in the murine skin graft model. Allograft survival was compared in untreated and costimulation blockade (500 microg anti-CD40L and 500 microg CTLA4-Ig, days 0, 2, 4, 6) treated recipients. In some recipients, CD4+ T cells were depleted using rat anti-murine CD4 (100 microg day -3, -2, -1, and weekly). RESULTS: gld mice treated with costimulation blockade enjoy a significantly greater increase in skin allograft survival than do wild-type mice. This effect is not replicated using lpr donors or recipients. Experiments in which CD4+ cells were depleted demonstrate that fasL is not necessary for CD8-mediated allograft rejection, and that depletion of CD4+ cells eliminates some of the survival advantage induced by costimulation blockade. CONCLUSIONS: FasL is not required for the establishment of costimulation blockade induced hyporesponsiveness, but rather appears to be required for normal costimulation blockade resistant rejection. Fas expression is not critical for costimulation blockade resistant rejection, suggesting that fasL may be interacting with other receptors. Further, it appears that CD4+ cells are important in the maintenance of allograft protection induced by costimulation blockade in this model.     

The CD28 peptidemimic can induce mixed chimerism and prolong the survival of cardiac allografts

Costimulatory blockade with CD28 peptidemimic (CD28PM, CD28 PM was synthesized by solid phase synthetic methods) prolongs cardiac allograft survival in mice, but has not reliably induced tolerance when used alone. In the current studies, we evaluated the effect of adding B7 blockade to a chimerism inducing nonmyeloablative regimen in mice and observed a significant improvement of donor bone marrow cells (BMC) engraftment, which had been associated with mixed chimerism and long-term survival of cardiac allografts. The mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) and the ear pinna cardiac transplantation model were performed to evaluate the effects of CD28PM in induction of specific immune hypo-response and extension of allograft survival. The expressed rates of B7.1 and B7.2 on the C57BL/6 splenocytes were 56.25% and 20.52%, respectively. The specific hypo-response status was established after immunization with CD28PM pre-treated donor splenocytes and the average inhibition rate was only 43% compared with normal control. Subsequently, a total number of 2 x 10(7) bone marrow cells per mouse were implanted to the recipients. The allogenic chimerism was obviously observed with the rate as high as 8.84% (mean) at the time point of day 14. During the first 50 days post bone marrow transfusion (BMT) the chimerism rate declined stepwise. But from 50 to 100 days, the chimerism rate sustained in a range of 3.35% to 4.6%. The results of transplantation experiments showed the survival of allgenic cardiac grafts were maintained over 100 days in recipients. Thus, donor BMC engraftment with mixed chimerism appears essential for induction of allograft tolerance using this conditioning regimen. Mixed chimerism approach, by the addition of CD28-B7 costimulatory blockade with CD28PM, has been shown to establish mixed chimerism and induce cardiac allograft tolerance in mice.     

Differential promotion of hematopoietic chimerism and inhibition of alloreactive T cell proliferation by combinations of anti-CD40Ligand, anti-LFA-1, everolimus, and deoxyspergualin

Allogeneic bone marrow (BM) engraftment for chimerism and transplantation tolerance may be promoted by combinations of costimulation blocking biologics and small molecular weight inhibitors. We showed previously in a mouse model that anti-CD40Ligand (anti-CD40L, CD154) combined with anti-LFA-1 or everolimus (40-O-(2-hydroxyethyl)-rapamycin) resulted in stable chimerism in almost all BM recipients, whereas anti-LFA-1 plus everolimus conferred approximately 50% chimerism stability. Here, we investigated whether this lower incidence could be increased with deoxyspergualin (DSG) in place of or in addition to everolimus. However, DSG and everolimus were similarly synergistic with costimulation blockade for stable hematopoietic chimerism. This correlated with allospecific T cell depletion and inhibition of acute but not chronic skin allograft rejection. Different treatments were also compared for their inhibition of alloreactive T cell proliferation in vivo. While anti-CD40L did not impair T cell proliferation, anti-LFA-1 reduced both CD4 and CD8 T cell proliferation, and combining anti-LFA-1 with everolimus or DSG had an additive inhibitory effect on CD4 T cell proliferation. Thus, despite their strong inhibition of alloreactive T cell proliferation, combinations of anti-LFA-1 with everolimus or DSG did not reach the unique potency of anti-CD40L-based combinations to support stable hematopoietic chimerism in this system.     

Effect of Inflammation on Costimulation Blockade-Resistant Allograft Rejection

Previously, we reported that allogeneic skin grafts were rapidly rejected by CD28 and CD40 ligand double deficient mice mediated by CD8⁺ T cells. These results indicated that some elements in addition to CD28- and CD40-mediated costimulation provide stimulatory signals for the activation of donor-specific CD8⁺ T cells. In this report, we investigated the role of inflammation associated with transplantation on costimulation-independent priming of CD8⁺ T cell during graft rejection. B6 RAG1 KO mice were transplanted with BALB/c-skin and adoptively transferred with syngeneic CD8⁺ T cells the same day or 50 days after transplantation. When blockade of CD28- and CD40-mediated costimulation failed to prevent acute rejection of freshly transplanted skin grafts, it efficiently delayed rejection of well-healed skin grafts. These results showed that factors associated with transplantation have essential roles in inducing costimulation blockade-resistant allograft rejection. Costimulation blockade failed to prevent acute graft-infiltration of NK cells and increasing expression of intragraft IL-12 and IL-15. These factors may trigger the graft-infiltration and priming of CD8⁺ T cells to induce costimulation blockade-resistant allograft rejection.     

Treg‐Therapy Allows Mixed Chimerism and Transplantation Tolerance Without Cytoreductive Conditioning

Establishment of mixed chimerism through transplantation of allogeneic donor bone marrow (BM) into sufficiently conditioned recipients is an effective experimental approach for the induction of transplantation tolerance. Clinical translation, however, is impeded by the lack of feasible protocols devoid of cytoreductive conditioning (i.e. irradiation and cytotoxic drugs/mAbs). The therapeutic application of regulatory T cells (Tregs) prolongs allograft survival in experimental models, but appears insufficient to induce robust tolerance on its own. We thus investigated whether mixed chimerism and tolerance could be realized without the need for cytoreductive treatment by combining Treg therapy with BM transplantation (BMT). Polyclonal recipient Tregs were cotransplanted with a moderate dose of fully mismatched allogeneic donor BM into recipients conditioned solely with short‐course costimulation blockade and rapamycin. This combination treatment led to long‐term multilineage chimerism and donor‐specific skin graft tolerance. Chimeras also developed humoral and in vitro tolerance. Both deletional and nondeletional mechanisms contributed to maintenance of tolerance. All tested populations of polyclonal Tregs (FoxP3‐transduced Tregs, natural Tregs and TGF‐β induced Tregs) were effective in this setting. Thus, Treg therapy achieves mixed chimerism and tolerance without cytoreductive recipient treatment, thereby eliminating a major toxic element impeding clinical translation of this approach.