Maxillary Sinus Augmentation in Humans Using Cortical Porcine Bone: A Histological and Histomorphometrical Evaluation After 4 and 6 Months

Background: Bone substitutes, such as allografts, xenografts, and alloplasts, have been proposed in several augmentation procedures. Purpose: The aim of the present study was a histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of specimens retrieved 4 or 6 months after sinus augmentation using cortical porcine bone augmentation material. Materials and Methods: A total of 77 specimens, retrieved after 4 and 6 months from augmented sinuses, were used in this study. The specimens were processed to be observed under light microscopy. Histomorphometric measurements were presented as means ± standard deviations. Results: Most of the particles were surrounded by newly formed bone with large osteocyte lacunae. Histomorphometry showed that, after 4 months, the newly formed bone represented 28%, marrow spaces 36%, the residual graft material 37%, while, after 6 months, the newly formed bone represented 31%, marrow spaces 34%, while the residual graft material was 37%. Conclusion: The present results show that cortical porcine bone is a biocompatible, osteoconductive biomaterial that can be used for maxillary sinus augmentation procedures without interfering with the normal reparative bone processes.     

上颌窦侧壁开窗提升术中应用CGF的骨增量影像学评价与临床对照研究

目的:探讨CGF在上颌窦底侧壁开窗提升术中的临床疗效和在Minics软件三维重建介导下的影像学变化.方法:收集因上颌后牙区骨量不足(<5 mm)拟行上颌窦侧壁开窗提升术的患者20例分为2组:实验组10例(CGF联合骨替代材料组)和对照组10例(仅使用骨替代材料组).本研究为临床对照研究,通过Minics 19.0软件三...     

The Buccofacial Wall of Maxillary Sinus: An Anatomical Consideration for Sinus Augmentation

Purpose: This study aimed to quantify the thickness of the buccofacial wall of the maxillary sinus where sinus augmentations are often performed.
Materials and Methods: Fourteen sites located 15 and 20 mm superior to the anatomical cervical line (named as groups H15 and H20, respectively) and along the long axes of the mid and the interproximal of two premolars and two molars were measured from 74 Korean hemiface cadavers.
Results: The buccofacial wall of the maxillary sinus was thinnest at the area between the maxillary second premolar and first molar in groups H15 and H20. The lowest mean thickness was 1.2 mm in both groups. The walls were thicker in males than in females, with statistically significant gender differences found at four and two sites on the anterior horizontal reference in groups H15 and H20, respectively. However, the thickness did not differ significantly with age or laterality. Incomplete septa were found in seven of the 74 specimens, and they were present in the area between the first and second molars in six (86%) of these cases.
Conclusions: These observations indicate that anatomical characteristics of the buccofacial wall thickness of the maxillary sinus need to be considered when performing a window opening procedure for sinus augmentation.     

Nanocrystalline Hydroxyapatite Bone Substitute Leads to Sufficient Bone Tissue Formation Already after 3 Months: Histological and Histomorphometrical Analysis 3 and 6 Months following Human Sinus Cavity Augmentation

Purpose: In this study the de novo bone formation capacity of a nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite bone substitute was assessed 3 and 6 months after its insertion into the human sinus cavity. Materials and Methods: Sinus cavity augmentation was performed in a total of 14 patients (n = 7 implantation after 3 months; n = 7 implantation after 6 months) with severely atrophic maxillary bone. The specimens obtained after 3 and 6 months were analyzed histologically and histomorphometrically with special focus on bone metabolism within the residual bone and the augmented region. Results: This study revealed that bone tissue formation started from the bone‐biomaterial‐interface and was directed into the most cranial parts of the augmented region. There was no statistically significant difference in new bone formation after 3 and 6 months (24.89 ± 10.22% vs 31.29 ± 2.29%), respectively. Conclusions: Within the limits of the present study and according to previously published data, implant insertion in regions augmented with this bone substitute material could be considered already after 3 months. Further clinical studies with bone substitute materials are necessary to validate these findings.     

Combining Scaffolds and Osteogenic Cells in Regenerative Bone Surgery: A Preliminary Histological Report in Human Maxillary Sinus Augmentation

Purpose: The following case series evaluated the maxillary sinus augmentation responses to tissue-engineered bone graft obtained by a culture of autogenous osteoblasts seeded on polyglycolic–polylactic scaffolds and calcium phosphate.
Materials and Methods: Sinus floor augmentation was performed bilaterally in five patients (mean age 58.4 years) with tissue-engineered bone (test site – Oral Bone®, BioTissue, Freiburg, Germany) or calcium phosphate (control site – Biocoral, Novaxa Spa, Milan, Italy). Biopsies were harvested 6 months after sinus augmentation for histometric evaluation. Volumetric measurements were taken at baseline and 6 months after the surgical procedure.
Results: The mean of vertical bone gain was 6.47 ± 1.39 mm and 9.14 ± 1.19 mm to test and control sites, respectively. The histological sections depicted mature bone with compact and cancellous areas. All biopsies contained varying percentages of newly formed bone and marrow spaces. The mean of bone tissue in the grafted area was 37.32 ± 19.59% and 54.65 ± 21.17% for tissue-engineered bone and calcium phosphate, respectively.
Conclusion: Within the limits of the present report, the histological data in humans confirmed that tissue-engineered bone and calcium phosphate allowed newly formed bone after maxillary sinus augmentation.     

Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation Surgery with Autogenous Bone Grafts as Ceiling: A Pilot Study and Test of Principle

Background: Studies have pointed out that the mere elevation of the maxillary sinus membrane might suffice to allow for bone formation indicating the additional use of augmentation materials to be redundant. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess whether elevation of the sinus mucosal lining combined with applying an autologous bone graft as a ceiling and placement of a short implant would allow for bone formation around the implant thus surpassing the need for applying augmentation materials around the installed implants. Materials and Methods: Fourteen consecutive patients were subjected to maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery and simultaneous placement of an implant. Using the lateral bone‐wall window technique, the membrane was exposed and elevated. Next, a bone graft taken from the zygomatic rim was placed as a ceiling above the inserted implant to ensure that the sinus membrane would not collapsed around a significant part of the implant. Finally, the bone window was returned in place. After connecting the healing abutment, the wound was closed. Results: All implants were stable and no implants were lost. There were no complications after harvesting the bone graft. Radiographic evaluation showed a bone gain of 3.2 ± 0.9 mm after 3 months and 3.6 ± 0.9 mm after 1 year. Less than 6% of the implant was not covered by bone after 1 year. Conclusion: Maxillary sinus membrane elevation and simultaneous placement of short endosseous implants with a bone graft as a ceiling on top of the implant result in predictable bone formation around the implant and good osseointegration on radiographs.     

自体植骨上颌窦底提升同期种植体植入术近期疗效观察

目的:评价自体骨开窗式上颌窦提升术对上颌后牙区牙槽骨高度严重不足(高度4～6mm)的患者种植治疗的近期疗效。方法:对4例上颌后牙骨量不足(高度4～6mm)而需种植修复的病例,实施自体植骨的开窗式上颌窦提升术,并同期植入种植体共9枚。自体移植骨来自种植窝制备时中空钻取骨,在需做牙槽嵴修整处的牙槽骨棘取骨,如不够再用刮骨器取骨或从颏部手术取骨,将所取之骨碾碎备用。结果:术后7个月拍片,均显示骨性愈合;冠修复后行使功能18～24个月效果理想。结论:自体取骨植骨用于上颌窦提升,可扩大种植手术适应证,降低种植成本。     

上颌窦底外提升植骨术49例牙种植的临床分析

目的:观察比较上颌窦底外提升植骨术同期或延期牙种植的临床效果.方法:对2003-04-2009-12在烟台市口腔医院种植中心就诊的49例行上颌窦底外提升植骨术,同期或延期牙种植的患者进行临床效果评价,随访观察时间为1～7年,采用寿命表法及x2检验进行统计学分析.结果:49例患者无1人失访,上颌窦底外提升植骨术同期牙种植...     

The "Dome Phenomenon" Associated with Maxillary Sinus Augmentation

Aim: This case series is aimed to report a new phenomenon, the "dome phenomenon," which was observed in infected augmented sinuses over several years.
Methods: Five patients are presented in whom sinus lift augmentation resulted in postoperative infection with inflammation and suppuration. The patients received aggressive anti-inflammatory treatment and surgical debridement of the inflamed tissue, including some grafted material performed through the lateral window of the primary procedure.
Results: The inflammatory condition was reversed, and the site healed clinically. Radiographically, a dome-shaped, radio-opaque tissue was observed at the superiormost aspect of the grafted sinus. This "dome phenomenon" was further confirmed during dental implant placement, which indicates healing potential adjacent to the maxillary sinus membrane.
Conclusions: The current report, as well as other studies and case series, suggests that there is great potential for healing and bone formation in the maxillary sinus membrane. The precise mechanism is not known. Further clinical and histologic studies are needed to understand the regenerative potential of the Schneiderian membrane.     

Bone Regeneration Using a Hollow Hydroxyapatite Space‐Maintaining Device for Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation – A Clinical Pilot Study

Background: The mere lifting of the maxillary sinus membrane by implants protruding into the sinus cavity allows the establishment of a void space for blood clot and new bone formation. Purpose: To evaluate bone formation by using a spherical, hollow, and perforated hydroxyapatite space‐maintaining device (HSMD) in a two‐stage sinus lift procedure where residual alveolar bone height was ≤2 mm. Material and Methods: Spherical, hollow, and perforated HSMDs with a diameter of 12 mm were manufactured for this pilot study. Three patients with a residual bone height of 1–2 mm, as verified clinically and radiographically, and in need of a sinus augmentation procedure prior to implant installation were selected for the study. The HSMD and bone formation was evaluated by cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) 6 months after augmentation procedure. Implants were installed 6 to 9 months after augmentation. The implant sites were prepared by a trephine drill to obtain a specimen of HSMD and bone for histological evaluation. After implant installation, the condition of the sinus membrane adjacent to the HSMD was evaluated endoscopically. After an additional 8 weeks, fixed partial prostheses were fabricated. Results: Bone formation verified by CBCT was found around and inside the device in all three patients after 6 months. Despite the fact that residual bone before augmentation was ≤2 mm, 12‐mm‐long implants with diameter of 4.8 mm could be inserted with preservation of an intact and healthy sinus membrane verified endoscopically. Bone formation inside HSMDs was noted histologically in two out of three HSMDs. Implants were stable and without any marginal bone loss after 1 year of prosthetic loading. Conclusion: A spherical, hollow, and perforated HSMD used in sinus lift procedures can produce a void space for blood clot and new bone formation and subsequent implant installation.     

Histological Outcomes on the Development of New Space‐making Devices for Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation

Background: Previous studies have pointed out that the mere elevation of the maxillary sinus membrane promotes bone formation without the use of augmentation materials. Purpose: This experimental study aimed at evaluating if the two‐stage procedure for sinus floor augmentation could benefit from the use of a space‐making device in order to increase the bone volume to enable later implant installation with good primary stability. Materials and Methods: Six male tufted capuchin primates (Cebus apella) were subjected to extraction of the three premolars and the first molar on both sides of the maxilla to create an edentulous area. The sinuses were opened using the lateral bone‐wall window technique, and the membrane was elevated. One resorbable space‐making device was inserted in each maxillary sinus, and the bone window was returned in place. The animals were euthanatized after 6 months, and biopsy blocks containing the whole maxillary sinus and surrounding soft tissues were prepared for ground sections. Results: The histological examination of the specimens showed bone formation in contact with both the schneiderian membrane and the device in most cases even when the device was displaced. The process of bone formation indicates that this technique is potentially useful for two‐stage sinus floor augmentation. The lack of stabilization of the device within the sinus demands further improvement of space‐makers for predictable bone augmentation. Conclusions: It is concluded that (1) the device used in this study did not trigger any important inflammatory reaction; (2) when the sinus membrane was elevated, bone formation was a constant finding; and (3) an ideal space‐making device should be stable and elevate the membrane to ensure a maintained connection between the membrane and the secluded space.     

A Clinical and Histological Case Series Study on Calcium Sulfate for Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation and Delayed Placement of Dental Implants

Background: Maxillary sinus floor augmentation is a procedure that is indicated in cases when the volume of the posterior maxillary bone is inadequate. The goal of this treatment is to obtain sufficient amount of bone tissue in order to gain osseointegration of endosseous implants. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to conduct a clinical and histological analysis of calcium sulfate (CaS) as bone graft substitute in sinus floor augmentation. Material and Methods: Ten patients with edentulous maxillas were included in this study. They had moderate to severe atrophy of the posterior maxilla. Surgiplaster (Classimplant®, Rome, Italy) was used as graft material in the maxillary sinus and was covered by BioGide® (Geistlish Pharmaceutical, Wolhusen, Switzerland). After 4 months of graft healing, 40 dental implants were placed and a biopsy for histomorphometry was taken at these occasions. The specimens were viewed by light microscope, and the extent of bone regeneration and remaining graft material was evaluated. Radiographs were taken at the time of sinus augmentation and after 4 months of graft healing. Results: At the time of abutment surgery, one implant was considered as a failure and was consequently removed, giving a survival rate of 97.5% after 1 year of loading. Radiographs showed a mean of 26.5% shrinkage of the augmented area. A significant resorption of CaS was noted with a mean value of 8.8% of remaining graft material after 4 months of healing. The biopsies also revealed new bone formation with a mean value of 21.2% of the total biopsy area. Histology showed signs of an acellular substitution of CaS with bone‐like tissue. Conclusion: The results of this study show that new bone regeneration occurs in the maxillary sinus after augmentation with CaS. This enabled successful placement, integration, and loading of dental implants in the posterior maxilla, as only 1 of 40 implants was lost during 1 year of follow‐up.