Elective induction vs. spontaneous labor associations and outcomes

OBJECTIVE: To determine factors and outcomes associated with elective medical induction of labor as compared with spontaneous labor in low-risk women. STUDY DESIGN: Using a birth certificate database including 11,849 low-risk, laboring women, univariate and multiple logistic regression was used to evaluate demographic and obstetric factors associated with elective labor induction. Low risk was defined as singleton, vertex, 37-41 weeks' gestation, no prior cesarean section, and no presenting medical/obstetric diagnoses considered indications for cesarean or induction. Adverse neonatal outcome was defined as 1- or 5-minute Apgar score < 7, neonatal intensive care unit admission or respiratory distress. Spontaneously laboring women (n = 10,608) were compared with women who underwent induced labor for no apparent medical/obstetric reason (n = 1,241). Interventions and outcomes during and after labor induction were adjusted for relevant associated variables. RESULTS: Odds ratios for epidural anesthesia, cesarean delivery and diagnoses of nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns were independently increased following elective induction; odds ratios for cephalopelvic disproportion, instrumental delivery and adverse neonatal outcome were not. Maternal length of stay was 0.34 days longer with induction than with spontaneous labor (p < 0.0001). Slightly more induced labors ended before midnight. CONCLUSION: As compared with spontaneous labor, elective labor induction is independently associated with more intrapartum interventions, more cesarean deliveries and longer maternal length of stay. Neonatal outcome is unaffected.     

Route of breech delivery and maternal and neonatal outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes in elective cesarean vs. attempted vaginal delivery for breech presentation at or near term. METHODS: We reviewed the maternal and neonatal charts of all singleton breech deliveries of at least 35 weeks' gestation or 2000 g delivered between 1986 and 1997 at our institution. Patients delivered by elective cesarean were compared to those attempting a vaginal delivery. The neonatal outcomes analyzed were: corrected mortality; Apgar scores less than 7 at 5 min; abnormal umbilical cord blood gases; birth trauma; and admissions to the intensive care nursery. Maternal morbidity was also assessed and compared. RESULTS: Of 848 women meeting criteria for evaluation, 576 were delivered by elective cesarean while 272 attempted a vaginal delivery. Of 272 women undergoing a trial of labor, 203 (74.6%) were delivered vaginally, while 69 (25.4%) failed an attempt at vaginal delivery and underwent a cesarean. When comparing patients delivered by elective cesarean with those attempting a vaginal delivery, no significant differences were noted in neonatal outcomes. However, maternal morbidity was higher among women delivered by cesarean, regardless of the indications for the procedure. Similar neonatal and maternal results were noted when nulliparous patients were analyzed separately. CONCLUSIONS: Cesarean delivery of selected near-term infants presenting as breech is associated with increased maternal morbidity without corresponding improvement in neonatal outcomes.     

Trial of labor or repeat cesarean delivery in women with morbid obesity and previous cesarean delivery

OBJECTIVE: Assess effects of body mass index (BMI) on trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery and determine whether morbidly obese women have greater maternal and perinatal morbidity with trial of labor compared with elective repeat cesarean delivery. METHODS: Secondary analysis from a prospective observational study included all term singletons undergoing trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Body mass index groups were as follows: normal 18.5-24.9, overweight 25.0-29.9, obese 30.0-39.9, morbidly obese 40.0 kg/m2 or greater, and were compared for failure and maternal and neonatal morbidities. The morbidly obese trial of labor and elective repeat cesarean delivery were compared for maternal and neonatal morbidities. Multivariable logistic regression analysis controlled for confounding variables. RESULTS: There were 14,142 trial of labor participants and 14,304 elective repeat cesarean delivery participants. Increasing BMI was directly associated with failed trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery: from 15.2% in normal weight (1,344) to 39.3% in morbidly obese (1,638), with combined risk of rupture/dehiscence increasing from 0.9% to 2.1% in morbidly obese women. Among morbidly obese women, trial of labor carried greater than five-fold risk of uterine rupture/dehiscence (2.1% versus 0.4%), almost a two-fold increase in composite maternal morbidity (7.2% versus 3.8%) and five-fold risk of neonatal injury (1.1% versus 0.2%) (fractures, brachial plexus injuries, and lacerations), but no neonatal encephalopathy. Morbidly obese women failing a trial of labor had six-fold greater composite maternal morbidity than those undergoing a successful trial of labor (14.2% versus 2.6%). CONCLUSION: Body mass index correlates with outcomes in trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Morbidly obese women undergoing a trial of labor were at increased risk for failure. Increased BMI was associated with greater composite morbidity and neonatal injury compared with elective repeat cesarean delivery, but absolute morbidities were small. Increased risks should be considered before trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.     

When has an induction failed?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the length of the latent phase that, during labor inductions in nulliparous women, is associated with significantly decreased chance of vaginal delivery and increased risk of maternal and neonatal morbidity. METHODS: All inductions of labor during a 6-month period were identified. Only those women who were nulliparous with a pregnancy of 36 weeks or more of gestation underwent further data analysis. Demographic data, intrapartum course, and maternal and neonatal outcomes were abstracted from the medical record. The latent phase was defined as beginning after oxytocin had been initiated and amniotomy performed and continuing until either 4 cm cervical dilation and 80% effacement or 5 cm cervical dilation regardless of effacement. RESULTS: A total of 397 nulliparous women, 32% of whom underwent cervical ripening, presented during the study period. Only 8 women (2%) never achieved active phase labor before cesarean, and the overall cesarean rate was 26.0%. A longer latent phase was associated with a greater rate of cesarean delivery, although only after 18 hours did a majority of induced labors result in cesarean. Chorioamnionitis and postpartum hemorrhage were more frequent with latent phases of labor greater than 18 hours (16% and 26%, respectively), although these diagnoses did not translate into greater risk of transfusion, hysterectomy, or prolonged hospitalization. Neonatal outcomes, including meconium passage, fetal acidemia, neonatal intensive care unit admission, or other morbidity did not increase in conjunction with longer latent phases. CONCLUSION: A latent phase of as long as 18 hours during induction of labor in nulliparous women allows the majority of these women to achieve a vaginal delivery without being subject to a significantly increased risk of significant maternal or neonatal morbidity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.     

Elective cesarean delivery, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and neonatal respiratory distress

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship among gestational age at elective cesarean delivery, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and whether the presence of pre-cesarean delivery labor or ruptured membranes affected the incidence of neonatal respiratory distress. METHODS: A chart review was performed of all elective caesarean deliveries (documented planned in advance) during 1 year, 2004-2005, in the Calgary Health Region; resulting in liveborn infants at or after 36 weeks of gestation and birth weight equal to or greater than 2,500 g. The primary outcomes are relative risk of NICU admission or respiratory distress. RESULTS: A total of 1,193 paired maternal and infant charts were reviewed. Admission rate to the NICU was 156 of 1,195 (13.1%). The most common admitting diagnosis was respiratory distress, 126 of 156 (80%). Male gender was a significant risk factor for admission to the NICU or respiratory distress (odds ratio [OR] 1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27-2.60, and OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.33-2.95, respectively). Elective cesarean delivery beyond 270 days of gestational age (38(4/7) weeks) significantly reduced the risk for NICU admission or respiratory distress (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43-0.89, and OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.34-0.74, respectively). The presence of spontaneous contractions or rupture of membranes before elective cesarean delivery did not reduce the risk of NICU admission or respiratory distress (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.69-1.62, and OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.60-1.55, respectively). CONCLUSION: Admission to NICU and development of respiratory distress were associated with gestational age at time of elective cesarean delivery and male gender. Awaiting the onset of labor or ruptured membranes did not appear to reduce the risk of NICU admission or neonatal respiratory distress.     

Balancing the risks of planned cesarean section and trial of vaginal delivery for the mature, selected, singleton breech presentation

The experience of mature, singleton, vaginal breech delivery over the last decade in our hospital is reviewed. This constitutes the largest series of breech delivery reported for over twelve years. Unlike all but two previous reports, we analyze our results by management policy; elective cesarean section, trial of vaginal breech delivery and cesarean section as soon as the diagnosis of breech delivery was made on labor ('expedite' cesarean operations). Six intrapartum or neonatal deaths occurred among 613 patients selected for trial of vaginal delivery--a rate of one per cent. There were none following 217 elective or 69 expedite cesarean sections. A detailed review of the literature over the last decade confirms that trial of vaginal delivery is more dangerous to the fetus and results in about one perinatal death of a normally formed infant in 200 deliveries. Apgar scores were slightly lower following trial of vaginal delivery and there were more irritable or injured babies in this group. The last intrapartum or neonatal death occurred in 1981. However, the elective cesarean section rate has increased from 14 to 33 per cent over this time period. Similarly the rate of failed trial of vaginal breech delivery has increased from 15 to 31 per cent. The proportion of failed trials was highest where the fetus was large but clinicians were poor at estimating fetal weight. Decision theory is used to examine the maternal utility of trial of vaginal breech delivery versus elective cesarean section when the intrapartum cesarean rate rises to these levels. It is shown that, from the point of view of maternal mortality and morbidity in the current pregnancy, trial of vaginal delivery maybe the more dangerous maternal option. Thus a low threshold for cesarean section in labor leads to greater fetal safety at the mother's expense. It is nevertheless concluded that maternal attitude and the long-term effects of a uterine scar should be considered in the final decision.     

The Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit cesarean registry: trial of labor with a twin gestation

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify the success rates and risks in women with a twin pregnancy who attempt a trial of labor after cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: Cases were identified in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network's Cesarean Registry with a woman with a twin pregnancy who had had at least 1 previous cesarean delivery. RESULTS: During the study period (1999-2002), 412 women fulfilled the study criteria, and 226 women had elective repeat cesarean delivery. Of the 186 women (45.1% of total) who attempted a trial of labor, 120 women were delivered successfully (success rate, 64.5%), and 66 women (35.5%) had a failed trial of labor. Thirty of the failed trials of labor involved a vaginal delivery for twin A and cesarean delivery for twin B. Women who attempted a trial of labor with twins had no increased risk of transfusion, endometritis, intensive care unit admissions, or uterine rupture when compared with elective repeat cesarean delivery. Fetal and neonatal complications were uncommon in either group at>or=34 weeks of gestation. CONCLUSION: A trial of labor with twins after previous cesarean delivery does not appear to increase maternal morbidity. Perinatal morbidity is uncommon at>or=34 weeks of gestation.     

Survey of Mode of Delivery and Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes in Canada

ObjectiveTo identify determinants of cesarean delivery (CD) and examine associations between mode of delivery (MOD) and maternal and perinatal outcomes.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of a Canadian multicentre birth cohort derived from provincial data collected in 2008/2009. Maternal and perinatal characteristics and outcomes were compared between vaginal and cesarean birth and between the following MOD subgroups: spontaneous vaginal delivery (VD), assisted VD, planned cesarean delivery (CD), and intrapartum CD. Multivariate regression identified determinants of CD and the effects of MOD and previous CD on maternal and perinatal outcomes.ResultsThe cohort included 264 755 births (72.1% VD and 27.9% CD) from 91 participating institutions. Determinants of CD included maternal age, parity, previous CD, chronic hypertension, diabetes, urinary tract infection or pyelonephritis, gestational hypertension, vaginal bleeding, labour induction, pre-term gestational age, low birth weight, large for gestational age, malpresentation, and male sex. CD was associated with greater risk of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Subgroup analysis demonstrated higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes with assisted VD and intrapartum CD than spontaneous VD. Planned CD reduced the risk of obstetric wound hematoma and perinatal mortality but increased maternal and neonatal morbidity. Previous CD increased the risk of maternal and neonatal morbidity among multiparous women.ConclusionsThe CD rate in Canada is consistent with global trends reflecting demographic and obstetric intervention factors. The risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes with CD warrants evaluation of interventions to safely prevent nonessential cesarean birth.     

Using a multifaceted quality improvement initiative to reverse the rising trend of cesarean births

Purpose: National efforts exist to safely reduce the rate of cesarean delivery, a major source of increased morbidity and healthcare costs. This is a report of a quality improvement study targeting reduction of primary cesarean deliveries.

Materials and methods: From March 2014 to March 2016, interventions included a nested case-control review of local risk factors, provider and patient education, multidisciplinary reviews based on published guidelines with feedback, provider report cards, commitment to labor duration guidelines, and a focus on natural labor. Primary outcomes were the total primary singleton vertex and the nulliparous term singleton vertex (NTSV) cesarean delivery rates. Secondary outcome measures were postpartum hemorrhage, chorioamnionitis, perineal laceration, operative delivery, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, stillbirth, and neonatal mortality. Statistical process control charts identified significant temporal trends.

Results: Control chart analysis demonstrated that the institutional cesarean delivery rate was due to culture and not “outlier” obstetricians. The primary singleton vertex cesarean rate decreased from 23.4% to 14.1% and the NTSV rate decreased from 34.5% to 19.2% (both p?Conclusions: Structured quality improvement initiatives may decrease primary cesarean deliveries without increasing maternal or perinatal morbidity.     

Attempted vaginal versus planned cesarean delivery in 195 breech first twin pregnancies

BACKGROUND: To compare neonatal and maternal outcomes for breech first twins according to whether vaginal or cesarean delivery was planned and to verify that in appropriate selected cases, attempted vaginal delivery is a reasonable choice. METHODS: A retrospective study of all twin pregnancies with the first twin in breech position and gestational age at least 35 weeks at birth at two French university hospital centers from January 1994 through December 2000. The primary outcome was a combined indicator of neonatal mortality and severe morbidity, as defined by one or more of the following: death before discharge, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, 5-minute Apgar score <7, cord blood pH <7.10, or birth trauma. RESULTS: Cesarean delivery was planned for 71 (36.4%) patients, and attempted vaginal delivery for 124 (63.6%), 59 (47.6%) of whom were delivered vaginally and 65 (52.4%) by cesarean during labor. Neither the combined negative outcome indicator nor neonatal mortality differed significantly for either twin or either group. There were no significant differences in maternal mortality or morbidity between the two groups. The frequency of deep vein thrombophlebitis or pulmonary embolism requiring anticoagulant therapy was significantly higher in the planned cesarean group [3/71 (4.2%) versus 0/124; p=0.047]. CONCLUSION: When appropriate criteria are used to decide mode of delivery, a careful intrapartum protocol is followed, and an experienced obstetrician, midwife, and anesthesiologist are in attendance, attempted vaginal delivery is a reasonable option for first twins in breech position.     

A Systematic Review of Implementing an Elective Labor Induction Policy

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of implementing hospital policies aimed at reducing elective labor induction and increasing spontaneous labor rates.Data SourcesPubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Dissertation Abstracts International.Study SelectionObservational studies published from 2000 to 2010 were the only original studies from the past 20 years that met the review criteria. These focused on elective induction, labor induction policies, pre‐ and postimplementation of labor induction policy outcomes, and cesarean and maternal/neonatal morbidity rates.Data ExtractionSix retrospective and three prospective observational studies regarding implementation of labor induction policies were reviewed for types of intervention guidelines implemented and outcomes on rates of induction, cesarean, and maternal/neonatal morbidity.Data SynthesisImplementation of elective induction policies resulted in lower induction, cesarean, operative/instrumental vaginal delivery, and maternal/neonatal morbidity rates. Patients spontaneously gave birth before scheduled elective induction date after policies were implemented, thereby resulting in lower rates of elective induction.ConclusionsElective labor induction policies should be developed and implemented in all labor and delivery units.     

Spontaneous versus induced labor after a previous cesarean delivery

OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes in spontaneous versus induced labor after one previous cesarean delivery. METHODS: Women with one previous cesarean delivery who had spontaneous labor between January 1992 and January 2000 were compared with those whose labor was induced. RESULTS: Three thousand seven hundred forty-six patients had a trial of labor (2943 spontaneous, 803 induced). Those induced had more frequent early postpartum hemorrhage (7.3% versus 5.0%; odds ratio [OR] 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18, 2.32), cesarean delivery (37.5% versus 24.2%; OR 1.84; 95% CI 1.51, 2.25), and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (13.3% versus 9.4%; OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.25, 2.29). There was a trend toward higher uterine rupture rates in those with induced versus spontaneous labor (0.7% versus 0.3%, P =.128) and for patients undergoing dinoprostone (prostaglandin E(2)) induction versus other methods (1.1% versus 0.6%, P =.62), although neither difference achieved statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Induced labor is associated with an increased rate of early postpartum hemorrhage, cesarean delivery, and neonatal ICU admission. The higher rate of uterine rupture in those who had labor induced was not statistically significant.     

Adverse obstetrical and neonatal outcomes in elective and medically indicated inductions of labor at term

Abstract

Objective: To compare the adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes after medically indicated and elective labor induction. Both induction groups were also compared to women with spontaneous onset of labor.

Method: Retrospective cohort study of 13?971 women with live, cephalic singleton pregnancies who delivered at term (from 1997 to 2007). Adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between women who underwent an induction of labor in the presence and absence of standard medical indications.

Results: Among 5090 patients with induced labor, 2059 (40.5%) underwent elective labor inductions, defined as inductions without any medical or obstetrical indication. Risks of cesarean or instrumental delivery, postpartum hemorrhage >500?ml, prolonged maternal hospitalization >6 days, Apgar<7 at 5?min of life, arterial umbilical cord pH<7.1, admission in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and prolonged NICU hospitalization >7 days were similar between nulliparous who underwent elective and medical labor induction. Similar results were obtained for multiparous. All the above mentioned risks, but the Apgar<7 at 5?min of life, were significantly increased after induction in comparison to spontaneous labor.

Conclusion: Elective induction of labor carries similar obstetrical and neonatal risks as a medically indicated labor induction. Thus, elective induction of labor should be strongly discouraged.     

Maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with spontaneous onset of labor at term

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the maternal morbidity associated with cesarean deliveries performed at term without labor compared with morbidity associated with spontaneous labor. METHODS: A 14-year, population-based, cohort study (1988-2001) using the Nova Scotia Atlee Perinatal Database compared maternal outcomes in nulliparous women at term undergoing spontaneous labor for planned vaginal delivery with singleton, cephalic presentation and nulliparous women delivering by cesarean without labor. RESULTS: From a total of 18,435 pregnancies, which satisfied inclusion and exclusion criteria, 721 were cesarean deliveries without labor. There were no maternal deaths or transfers for intensive care. There was no difference in wound infection, blood transfusion, or intraoperative trauma. Women undergoing cesarean deliveries without labor were more likely to have puerperal febrile morbidity (relative risk [RR] 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1, 4.5; P=.03), but were less likely to have early postpartum hemorrhage (RR 0.6; 95% CI 0.4, 0.9; P=.01) compared with women entering spontaneous labor. Subgroup analyses of maternal outcomes in women delivering by spontaneous and assisted vaginal delivery and cesarean delivery in labor were also performed. The highest morbidity was found in the assisted vaginal delivery and cesarean delivery in labor groups. CONCLUSION: The increased maternal morbidity in elective cesarean delivery compared with spontaneous onset of labor is limited to puerperal febrile morbidity. Maternal morbidity is increased after assisted vaginal delivery and cesarean delivery in labor compared with cesarean delivery without labor.     

The problem of relating fetal outcome with breech presentation to mode of delivery

We retrospectively analyzed 546 consecutive singleton pregnancies with breech presentations that ended at ≧36 weeks of gestation for the relationship between the intended mode of delivery and fetal outcome. Twelve patients were excluded from the analysis because these infants had major malformations. Of the 534 remaining patients, 124 (23%) were delivered by elective cesarean section. The other 410 women (77%) went into spontaneous labor. Intrapartum emergency cesarean section was required in 112 (27%) of these 410 women; the other 298 (73%) were delivered vaginally. There were 5 poor neonatal outcomes: 3 perinatal deaths and 2 cases of cerebral palsy probably due to intrapartum asphyxia. The risk of poor outcome was thus 1.2% (5/410), in the intended vaginal delivery group vs. no such outcome in the group of 124 patients that had an elective cesarean section. Three of 5 infants with poor outcome were actually born by emergency cesarean section and comparisons of results according to ultimate method of delivery rather than according to intended method of delivery may be misleading and in our case would have been biased against cesarean section. Received: 4 July 1995 / Accepted: 21 December 1995     

ST Waveform Analysis versus Cardiotocography Alone for Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Objective To estimate the effectiveness of intrapartum ST waveform analysis (STAN) versus cardiotocography (CTG) alone in prevention of metabolic acidosis.Study Design Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing intrapartum fetal monitoring utilizing STAN with CTG versus CTG alone. Primary outcome was neonatal metabolic acidosis, defined as umbilical arterial pH <7.05 and base deficit >12 mmol/L.Results Five randomized trials including 15,303 singletons, vertex, term, or near-term pregnancies met inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Compared with CTG alone, STAN with CTG was associated with similar incidences of metabolic acidosis (0.81% versus 1.12%, relative risk [RR] 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44 to 1.47), perinatal death, neonatal encephalopathy, Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, and cesarean delivery. Operative vaginal delivery (OVD) was lower in the STAN with CTG compared with CTG alone (13.56% versus 15.20%; RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.83 to 0.97).Conclusion There is no difference in perinatal outcomes between STAN with CTG compared with CTG alone, except for lower rate of OVD.     

Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in the twin gestation

The pregnancy outcomes of 56 women with a twin gestation and a prior cesarean birth were analyzed to determine whether a trial of labor was a reasonable consideration. Of these patients, 31 (55%) underwent an elective repeat cesarean delivery and 25 (45%) attempted vaginal delivery. Of those who attempted vaginal delivery, 18 (72%) were vaginally delivered of both infants. The dehiscence rate among women with twin pregnancies who attempted a trial of labor was 4% compared with 2% in women with singleton pregnancies. There were no significant differences in maternal or neonatal morbidity or mortality rates in trial of labor versus no trial of labor groups. We conclude in this limited population that a trial of labor in a twin gestation after a previous cesarean delivery appears to be a reasonable consideration. The usual safeguards for attempted vaginal delivery in the twin gestation should be followed.     

Cost-effectiveness of a trial of labor after previous cesarean

OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost-effective method of delivery, from society's perspective, in patients who have had a previous cesarean. METHODS: We completed an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis of a trial of labor relative to cesarean using a computerized model for a hypothetical 30-year old parturient. The model incorporated data from peer-reviewed studies, actual hospital costs, and utilities to quantify health-related quality of life. A threshold of $50,000 per quality-adjusted life-years was used to define cost-effective. RESULTS: The model was most sensitive to the probability of successful vaginal delivery. If the probability of successful vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) was less than 0.65, elective repeat cesarean was both less costly and more effective than a trial of labor. Between 0.65 and 0.74, elective repeat cesarean was cost-effective (the cost-effectiveness ratio was less than $50,000 per quality-adjusted life-years), because, although it cost more than VBAC, it was offset by improved outcomes. Between 0.74 and 0.76, trial of labor was cost-effective. If the probability of successful vaginal delivery exceeded 0.76, trial of labor became less costly and more effective. Costs associated with a moderately morbid neonatal outcome, as well as the probabilities of infant morbidity occurring, heavily impacted our results. CONCLUSION: The cost-effectiveness of VBAC depends on the likelihood of successful trial of labor. Our modeling suggests that a trial of labor is cost-effective if the probability of successful vaginal delivery is greater than 0.74. Improved algorithms are needed to more precisely estimate the likelihood that a patient with a previous cesarean will have a successful vaginal delivery.     

Vaginal birth after cesarean section: X-ray pelvimetry at term is informative

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether X-ray pelvimetry data to evaluate the likelihood of vaginal birth after previous cesarean section. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: University hospital. POPULATION: Patients with a previous cesarean delivery who underwent X-ray pelvimetry and gave birth at gestational age 37 weeks during a seven-year period. METHODS: 1190 patients with a scarred uterus were compared with 15,189 patients without a scarred uterus. In the scarred uterus group, 760 patients with a transverse pelvic diameter > or =12 cm were compared with 430 patients with a transverse pelvic diameter <12 cm. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The obstetrical outcomes were spontaneous or induced labor, and mode of delivery. The maternal morbidity outcomes were hemorrhage requiring transfusion of packed red cells, uterine rupture, bladder injury, and hysterectomy due to hemorrhage. The neonatal morbidity outcomes were the 5-min Apgar score, transfer to intensive care, and intubation. RESULTS: Patients with a scarred uterus had a significantly higher rate of cesarean section (35.5%) than those with no prior cesarean section (9%). Among patients with a scarred uterus who were selected for vaginal delivery, 81% delivered vaginally when the transverse diameter (TD) of the pelvic inlet was greater than 12 cm, 68% when the TD was between 11.5 and 12 cm, and 58% when the TD was less than 11.5 cm. Maternal morbidity was significantly higher in the patients with a scarred uterus. The neonatal results were comparable in the different groups. CONCLUSION: X-ray pelvimetry tailors the information given to each patient about the likelihood of having a vaginal delivery. It can also be used to optimize the selection of patients allowed to enter labor.     

Preoperative administration of recombinant human erythropoietin in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a diminished intrapartum amniotic fluid volume represents a risk of adverse neonatal outcome when it occurs in conjunction with prolonged labor. METHODS: The intrapartum amniotic fluid index (iAFI) was measured in 242 parturients over 35 weeks of gestation during 1st-stage labor, and the umbilical artery blood gas was analyzed at delivery. The subjects were divided into group A (n = 99), having a diminished amniotic fluid volume (iAFI < or = 8.0 cm) and group B (n = 143), having a normal amniotic fluid volume (iAFI 8.1-20.0 cm), and selected antenatal, delivery, and neonatal variables were compared. In addition, the two groups were subdivided according to the duration of labor. Statistical analysis was performed using independent Student's t test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square analysis, and Fisher's exact test where appropriate. p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The patient characteristics and pregnancy outcomes were similar in groups A and B, as were the incidences of an umbilical artery blood pH <7.20 and/or an Apgar score <7 (group A 9.5%, group B 10.1%). In group A, however, the incidence of an adverse neonatal outcome was 23.5% in cases in whom the duration of labor was longer than 8 h which was significantly higher than in cases in whom the duration of labor was 8 h or less (2.8%; p < 0.01). In group B, the incidence of an adverse neonatal outcome was similar in the two subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of an adverse neonatal outcome is higher in patients with diminished amniotic fluid volume if labor is prolonged. Consequently, determination of the iAFI could be a useful admission test.