Treatment of liver metastases in patients with neuroendocrine tumors

Background: Hepatic metastases of neuroendocrine tumors demand differentiated therapeutic management due to the unique natural course and hormone secretion of the tumors. Aim: The purpose of the prospective nonrandomized study was to review the institutional experience with surgical treatment of hepatic neuroendocrine metastases. Patients and methods: From September 1992 until March 1996 29 consecutive patients with neuroendocrine tumors have been evaluated for surgical treatment of liver metastases. Of them, 11 (37.9%) fulfilled criteria for surgical treatment of hepatic secondary tumors. Extensive preoperative workup was carried out. Patients were divided in groups for curative or palliative resection. Liver transplantation was carried out in selected patients with disseminated liver metastases. Results: Of 29 patients 4 (13.7%) underwent curative resection and in 3 patients (10.3%) palliative resection was performed. The patients who underwent curative resection are all biochemically and clinically tumor free at a mean postoperative follow-up of 22.3 months. Two patients who underwent palliative resection are alive at 40 and 29 months, respectively. From 12 patients evaluated for liver transplantation 4 were considered as suitable candidates. Conclusions: Liver resection can be recommended in patients with hepatic metastases of neuroendocrine tumors in terms of potential survival prolongation and palliation. Liver transplantation is generally acceptable treatment in highly selected group of these patients. Long-term results have to be awaited before definitive proof of the beneficial effect of surgical treatment. Received: 14 November 1997     

Outcome After Hepatectomy for Multiple (Four or More) Colorectal Metastases in the Era of Effective Chemotherapy

Background Hepatic resection is generally accepted as the only potential for long-term survival in patients with colorectal metastases confined to the liver. Despite an unknown benefit, hepatic resection is playing an increasing role in patients with extensive disease. Methods A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained hepatobiliary surgical database was carried out. Outcome after hepatectomy for four or more colorectal hepatic metastases was reviewed. Results Between 1998 and 2002, out of a total of 584 patients, 98 (17%) with four or more colorectal hepatic metastases were resected. Actuarial 5-year survival was 33% for the entire group, with seven actual 5-year survivors. There were no perioperative deaths, and the perioperative morbidity was 28%. Positive margins and extrahepatic disease resection were independently associated with poor outcome. The median disease-free survival was 12 months, with no actuarial disease-free survivors at 5 years. Recurrence pattern, response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, time to recurrence, and resection of recurrent disease were also associated with outcome. Conclusions Long-term survival can be achieved after resection of multiple colorectal metastases; however, because most patients will experience recurrence of disease, effective adjuvant therapy and close follow-up is necessary.     

Hepatic Resection for Metastatic Renal Tumors: Is It Worthwhile?

Background: Liver metastases of malignant renal tumors are regarded as having an ominous prognosis because they are infrequently amenable to radical surgery and respond poorly to chemotherapy. Little is known of the outcome of isolated metastases to the liver for which resection is potentially curative.Methods: Data on 14 patients with liver metastases from renal tumors who underwent a liver resection in a single center between 1982 and 2001 were analyzed retrospectively.Results: There was no operative or postoperative mortality. The median survival was 26 months, with a survival rate of 69% at 1 year and 26% at 3 years. The curative pattern of hepatectomy (2-year survival, 69% vs. 0%; P = .001), an interval between the nephrectomy and the diagnosis of liver metastases in excess of 24 months (2-year survival, 71% vs. 25%; P = .05), tumor size <50 mm (2-year survival, 83% vs. 17%; P = .006), and the possibility of achieving a repeat hepatectomy in the case of recurrence (2-year survival, 100% vs. 21%; P = .02) were associated with a better outcome after the liver resection. Four patients were alive without evidence of disease at 6, 12, 26, and 96 months after the first hepatic resection, and one was alive with hepatic recurrence 18 months after resection.Conclusions: In patients with liver metastases of malignant renal tumors, an aggressive policy for achieving tumor eradication seems to offer a chance for long-term survival, especially after a long disease-free interval from the nephrectomy. However, despite an aggressive policy for achieving tumor eradication, recurrence frequently occurs after liver resection.     

Surgery for multiple hepatic colorectal metastases

The purpose of this review is to address three important questions concerning hepatic resection for multiple colorectal metastases. (1) Is the number of tumors truly a significant prognostic factor? (2) Are patients with four or more tumors contraindicated for hepatic resection? (3) Up to how many nodules should we attempt to resect? Although the efficacy of surgical resection for one to three hepatic metastases is clear, based on several reports, the literature regarding the resection of four or more metastatic lesions is conflicting. Review of the data at our institutions showed that the number of tumors was a significant prognostic factor, because patient survival after liver resection for multiple metastases was worse than that for single metastasis. However, patients with two or three nodules and those with four or more nodules showed the same survival curves, or those with four or more metastases fared even better. Therefore, patients with four or more metastases should be considered for hepatic resection. The maximum number of hepatic tumors in longterm survivors reported in the literature has been increasing, and the limit for the number of respectable metastases has not yet been determined. Because liver resection is still the only treatment that offers a cure, surgery for multiple metastases may be justified as long as the operation is safe and technically feasible.     

Analysis of treatment that includes both hepatic and pulmonary resections for colorectal metastases

Purpose

Hepatic or pulmonary resections for colorectal metastases are regarded as standard treatment worldwide; however, the clinical significance of both hepatic and pulmonary resections for colorectal metastases remains undefined. We reviewed our clinical experience to evaluate the benefit of this treatment.

Methods

Between 1986 and 2010, 186 patients underwent potentially curative hepatic and/or pulmonary resections for colorectal metastases. Of these patients, 25 underwent both treatments (Group C), 100 underwent hepatic resections alone (Group H), and 61 underwent pulmonary resections alone (Group L). Univariate and multivariate analyses of the clinical and pathological variables in Group C and comparative survival analyses between Group C and Groups H–L were performed.

Results

In Group C, the median survival after primary tumor resection, initial metastasectomy, and last metastasectomy were 97, 60, and 35 months, respectively, and the 5-year overall survival rates were 63, 54, and 38 %, respectively. Multivariate analyses after initial metastasectomy revealed rectal tumors, multiple hepatic tumors, and simultaneous metastases as poor prognostic factors. Comparative survival analyses revealed no significant difference in overall survival between Group C and Groups H–L.

Conclusion

Hepatic and pulmonary resections for colorectal metastases improve survival and may even offer the potential for cure in selected patients.     

Recurrence at surgical margin following hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases is not associated with R1 resection and does not impact survival

BackgroundResection margin status has traditionally been associated with tumor recurrence and oncological outcome following liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. Previous studies, however, did not address the impact of resection margin on the site of tumor recurrence and did not differentiate between true local recurrence at the resection margin and recurrence elsewhere in the liver. This study aimed to determine whether positive resection margins determine local recurrence and whether recurrence at the surgical margin influences long-term survival.MethodsClinicopathological data and oncological outcomes of patients who underwent curative resection for colorectal liver metastases between 2012 and 2017 at 2 major hepatobiliary centers (Bern, Switzerland, and Berlin, Germany) were assessed. Cross-sectional imaging following hepatectomy was reviewed by radiologists in both centers to distinguish between recurrence at the resection margin, defined as hepatic local recurrence, and intrahepatic recurrence elsewhere. The association between surgical margin status and location of tumor recurrence was evaluated, and the impact on overall survival was determined.ResultsDuring the study period, 345 consecutive patients underwent hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Histologic surgical margins were positive for tumor cells (R1) in 63 patients (18%). After a median follow-up time of 34 months, tumor recurrence was identified in 154 patients (45%). Hepatic local recurrence was not detected more frequently after R1 than after R0 resection (P = .555). Hepatic local recurrence was not associated with worse overall survival (P = .436), while R1 status significantly impaired overall survival (P = .025). Additionally, overall survival was equivalent between patients with hepatic local recurrence and patients with any intrahepatic and/or extrahepatic recurrence. In patients with intrahepatic recurrence only, oncological outcomes improved if local hepatic therapy was possible (resection or ablation) in comparison to patients treated only with chemotherapy or best supportive care (3-year overall survival: 85% vs 39%; P < .0001).ConclusionThe incidence of hepatic local recurrence after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases is independent of R1 resection margin status. Additionally, hepatic local recurrence at the resection margin is not associated with worse overall survival compared with any other intra- or extrahepatic recurrence. Therefore, R1 status at hepatectomy seems to be a surrogate factor for advanced disease without influencing location of recurrence and thereby oncological outcome. This finding may support decision-making when extending the indication for surgery in borderline resectable colorectal liver metastases.     

Combined Resection and Radiofrequency Ablation for Advanced Hepatic Malignancies: Results in 172 Patients

Background: Resection combined with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a novel approach in patients who are otherwise unresectable. The objective of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of hepatic resection combined with RFA.Methods: Patients with multifocal hepatic malignancies were treated with surgical resection combined with RFA. All patients were followed prospectively to assess complications, treatment response, and recurrence.Results: Seven hundred thirty seven tumors in 172 patients were treated (124 with colorectal metastases; 48 with noncolorectal metastases). RFA was used to treat 350 tumors. Combined modality treatment was well tolerated with low operative times and minimal blood loss. The postoperative complication rate was 19.8% with a mortality rate of 2.3%. At a median follow-up of 21.3 months, tumors had recurred in 98 patients (56.9%). Failure at the RFA site was uncommon (2.3%). A combined total number of tumors treated with resection and RFA >10 was associated with a faster time to recurrence (P = .02). The median actuarial survival time was 45.5 months. Patients with noncolorectal metastases and those with less operative blood loss had an improved survival (P = .03 and P = .04, respectively), whereas radiofrequency ablating a lesion >3 cm adversely impacted survival (HR = 1.85, P = .04).Conclusions: Resection combined with RFA provides a surgical option to a group of patients with liver metastases who traditionally are unresectable, and may increase long-term survival.     

Effects of systemic and regional chemotherapy after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases

Background: Although the survival benefit of hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis has been established, some controversy remains regarding the significance of adjuvant chemotherapy after hepatic resection. Methods: One hundred thirty-two consecutive patients who had liver resection for colorectal metastasis at our hospital between 1980 and 1997 were studied. After curative hepatic resection, 37 patients underwent systemic chemotherapy, administered orally or intraportally. Forty patients had no adjuvant chemotherapy. The chemotherapeutic agents used for oral administration were uracil and Tegafur or Tegafur alone. Mitomycin C (MMC) or 5-FU was used for IV chemotherapy. Combinations of 5-FU/leucovorin or MMC/5-FU (doxorubicin) were used for regional chemotherapy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to test the significance of adjuvant chemotherapy for patient survival or disease-free survival. Results: Overall 5-year survival was 42.2% (95% CL: 31.2%, 53.2%). Among the possible prognostic factors studied, univariate analysis showed a significant difference in survival based on the number of tumors and lymph node metastases in the hepatic hilum. There was a significant difference in disease-free survival based on adjuvant chemotherapy and lymph node metastasis. The multivariate analysis for patient survival selected four prognostic factors (P<.05), including adjuvant chemotherapy, lymph node metastasis, disease-free interval, and tumor size. The multivariate analysis for disease-free survival selected adjuvant chemotherapy, lymph node metastasis, and disease-free interval as significant factors. The most common recurrence site was remnant liver, regardless of adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions: Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved survival and disease-free survival after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. It did not decrease recurrence rate in the remnant liver.Presented at the 51st Annual Cancer Symposium of The Society of Surgical Oncology, San Diego, California, March 26–28, 1998.     

Major hepatic resection for metachronous metastases from colon cancer.

Hepatic resection of metastatic colorectal cancer is being performed with increasing frequency. Reports describe wide variations in survival after resection of solitary of multiple metastases. In 23 consecutive patients having major hepatic resection for metachronous metastases from colorectal cancers, 18 patients had one, two, or three metastases and five had four or more individual metastases; the cure rate of one, two, or three metachronous metastases was comparable to reports of resected solitary simultaneous metastases. The median maximum diameter of metastases in patients both surviving and dead was 7 cm. Features separating surviving from dead patients were resection margins of at least 1 cm and fewer than four metastatic nodules. All patients with four or more hepatic metastases died of disease, 80% with further liver metastases. Only three of 18 (17%) patients with one, two, or three metastases developed further hepatic lesions. This study suggests that the biology of the hepatic metastatic disease is paramount; timing of the hepatic resection is of little importance. Delayed resection of suitable biologic situations does not impair survival opportunities, and early resection of inappropriate biologic situations with more than three hepatic metastases does not improve survival. Therefore, programs of early detection with the use of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) screening or "second look" operations will not increase cure rates.     

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a treatment strategy for multiple bilobar liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma

Hepatic resection remains the only potentially curative therapy for patients with colorectal liver metastases. Because most have multiple bilobar liver metastases, surgical resection is possible in only 25-58% of patients with colorectal liver metastases. Currently, attention is focused on the potential for neoadjuvant chemotherapy to render formerly unresectable patients resectable. The availability of more efficacious chemotherapy agents and an inventive approach to delivery schedules have resulted in an increase in the number of candidates for hepatic resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Although tumor response varies with regimen and/or route of chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases, with 16-63% tumor response rates, hepatic resection for responders after neoadjuvant chemotherapy gives survival benefits, with 20-48% 5-year survival rates after surgery. Provided that neoadjuvant chemotherapy controls multiple bilobar liver metastases well, aggressive hepatic resection should be considered for patients with those lesions. As a treatment strategy for multiple bilobar liver metastases, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a useful to increase resection rates and may contribute to the improvement of prognosis in patients with such lesions.     

Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis in Resectable Synchronous and Metachronous Colorectal Liver Metastasis

Introduction Hepatic resection may offer long-term survival for patients with colorectal metastases. However, controversies exist regarding the prognostic factors. Herein, the impact of synchronicity of liver metastasis on patient clinicopathological features and prognosis was evaluated. Methods One hundred and fifty-five patients who underwent hepatectomy for colon cancer metastasis, from 1995 to 2004, were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into two groups: synchronous and metachronous colorectal liver metastasis. Patient demographics, the nature of the primary and metastatic tumors, surgery-related complications, and long-term outcome were analyzed. Results Patients included in the synchronous group tended to be younger than those in the metachronous group. Compared to the metachronous group, patients in the synchronous group showed more metastases (P = 0.008) and bilobarly distributed metastases (P = 0.016). Bile leakage was the most common surgical complication. The estimated 5-year disease-free and overall survival rates were 16.8 and 41.1%, respectively. Univariate analysis indicated that synchronous metastases, advanced stage of the primary tumor, bilobar distribution of the metastases, more than three metastases, and colonic versus rectal location of the primary tumor were prognostic factors of shorter disease-free survival, but not overall survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that synchronous metastases and the advanced stage of the primary tumor were indicators for a worse disease-free survival. Conclusion The synchronous presence of primary colon cancer and liver metastasis may indicate a more disseminated disease status and is associated with a shorter disease-free survival than metachronous metastasis. These patients may need more careful monitoring and aggressive chemotherapy following curative resection.     

Prognostic differences between oligometastatic and polymetastatic disease after resection in patients with colorectal cancer and hepatic or lung metastases: Retrospective analysis of a large cohort at a single institution

BackgroundLong-term survival data are lacking, and prognostic factors are not well-defined for patients with colorectal cancer and hepatic or lung metastases. This study evaluated the outcomes after resection of oligometastatic hepatic or lung metastases from colorectal cancer and sought to identify prognostic factors.MethodsWe retrospectively investigated 1,123 patients with colorectal cancer and hepatic or pulmonary metastases who underwent curative surgery between January 1991 and December 2016.ResultsOf the 1,123 patients, 719 had hepatic metastases, 287 had pulmonary metastases, and 117 had both. The 5-year overall survival rate was 52.3% in the hepatic metastases group, 70.4% in the pulmonary metastases group, and 71.4% in the hepatic and pulmonary metastases group (P < .001). In total, 1,045 patients had oligometastases (1–5 metastatic lesions in 1 or 2 organs) and 78 had polymetastases (≥6 metastases in 1 or 2 organs). Prognosis was significantly better in patients with oligometastases than in those with polymetastases. The 5-year overall survival rate was 59.0% in the oligometastases group and 35.3% in the polymetastases group (P < .001); the respective 5-year relapse-free survival rates were 37.5% and 11.6% (P < .001). Multivariable analysis identified predictors of both poor overall survival and relapse-free survival to be a high carcinoembryonic antigen level before the first metastasectomy, largest metastasis measuring ≥2 cm, polymetastases, and synchronous metastases.ConclusionPrognosis after curative resection was better in patients with oligometastatic colorectal cancer in the liver or lung than in those with polymetastases. Multidisciplinary decision-making strategies, including about surgery, should be based on number of metastases rather than their site.     

Additive Chemotherapie bei Lebermalignomen zur Verbesserung der Operabilität

Complete tumor resection is the only curative option for patients with colorectal liver metastases. Hepatic resection is frequently not possible for technical reasons: because of large tumors, multiple or bilateral metastases, or tumors that are too close to vessels. In these cases chemotherapy might downstage the tumor volume and facilitate secondary curative resection in patients initially not eligible for curative surgery. Treatment with fluorouracil (5-Fu) alone has resulted in disappointing response rates of about 10-20% in patients with colorectal liver metastases, which make these protocols useless in the neoadjuvant setting. Because regional chemotherapy into the hepatic arteria results in significantly higher response rates (40-50%), some studies have documented some success in secondary curative surgery after regional chemotherapy of initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases. However, regional chemotherapy is invasive and therefore not standard therapy for every patient with colorectal liver metastases. Recently new exciting treatment options have become available for colorectal cancer. Combinations of chemotherapy consisting of irinotecan and 5-Fu/FA or oxaliplatin and 5-Fu/FA result in response rates of 50% and can be considered a new standard first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Recently, two encouraging retrospective studies have been published with chronomodulated chemotherapy of oxaliplatin and 5-Fu/FA in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases. With this multidisciplinary approach, antitumor activity of chemotherapy appears to be translated into a long-term survival benefit and some patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases can potentially be cured. As a consequence, on the premises of close cooperation between surgeons and internists, more patients with metastatic colorectal cancer will be cured in the future.     

Survival After Hepatic Resection for Colorectal Metastases: A 10-Year Experience

Background Metastatic colorectal cancer is a major cause of cancer death in North America. Hepatic resection offers the potential for cure in selected patients. We report the long-term outcomes of patients who underwent hepatic resection for colorectal metastases over a 10-year period at a single hepatobiliary surgical oncology center. Methods All patients who underwent liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer between 1992 and 2002 were identified. Data were retrospectively obtained through chart review. Major outcome variables were disease-free survival and overall survival. Risk factors for disease recurrence and mortality were identified by multivariate analysis by using the Cox proportional hazard method. Results A total of 423 hepatectomies were performed for metastatic colorectal cancer. Most operations (n = 276; 65%) were major (four or more segments) hepatectomies. Perioperative morbidity occurred in 74 (17%) patients. There were seven (1.6%) perioperative deaths. The disease-free survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 64%, 27%, and 22%, respectively. The overall survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 93%, 47%, and 28%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified four negative predictive factors for overall survival (hazard ratio; 95% confidence interval): a positive surgical margin (2.9; 1.5–5.3), large metastases (>5 cm; 1.5; 1.1–2.0), multiple metastases (1.4; 1.1–1.9), and age >60 years (1.4; 1.1–1.9). Conclusions Hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer is safe and provides good long-term overall survival rates of 47% at 5 years and 28% at 10 years. An aggressive approach is justified by the low operative mortality rate and good long-term survival, even in individuals with multiple bilobar metastases.     

Liver resection and transplantation — Therapeutic concepts in surgical treatment of hepatic metastases

Summary Background: Surgical procedures such as liver resection or liver transplantation are the only treatment modalities that provide a chance of cure for patients with liver metastases. Methods: This report reviews results of liver resection and liver transplantation for liver metastases from colorectal cancer and neuroendocrine tumors as compared to the natural course. Results: Overall 5 year survival after curative liver resection for colorectal metastases ranges between 25 and 48%. The operative mortality is between 0 and 5%. Risk factors for tumor recurrence are more or less defined. Reresections of metastases can be performed with comparable mortality rates and results. Liver transplantation for unresectable colorectal metastases offers a median survival of 28 months, but the chance of cure only for individual patients. Exclusion of patients with positive lymph nodes of the primary tumor improves median survival. As there are alternative treatment options for neuroendocrine metastases, indication for liver resection or transplantation is not clearly defined, but the chance of cure by means of surgical treatment should not be missed. Curative resections of neuroendocrine liver metastases can achieve 5-year survival rates of more than 80%. Conclusions: Radical surgical removal of liver metastases from colorectal and neuroendocrine cancer can improve the prognosis for selected patients. Further improval is expected from a multimodal approach.      

Resecting large numbers of hepatic colorectal metastases

Background : Despite the widespread use of surgical resection as a treatment for hepatic colorectal metastases, the value of resecting more than three metastases remains controversial. It was the objective of this study to determine if resection of larger numbers of metastases affects patient survival. Method : The survival of 123 consecutive patients who underwent curative hepatic resection for colorectal metastases between 1989 and 1999 by a single surgeon was analysed retrospectively. Kaplan–Meier survival statistics and Cox regression were used to determine the factors that affected survival, and logistic regression was used to determine the factors that affected the risk of recurrence of hepatic disease. Results : The median survival rate for the whole group of patients was 38 months, with 1, 3 and 5 year survival rates of 88%, 53% and 31% respectively. The survival rate of patients undergoing resection of four to seven metastases (n = 22; 5 year survival = 39%) was not significantly different to that of patients undergoing resection of one to three metastases (n = 91; 5 year survival = 30%), P = 0.9. Age, sex, primary cancer site, hepatic disease distribution, resection margins and adjuvant hepatic arterial chemotherapy (HAC) did not affect survival. Local invasion of the hepatic metastases (relative risk (RR) = 2.9; P = 0.001) and hepatic disease recurrence (RR = 2.1; P = 0.007) were the only factors that independently affected survival. Local invasion of the hepatic metastasis was the only factor associated with an increased risk of hepatic recurrence (RR = 2.8; P = 0.03). Adjuvant HAC did not affect the risk of hepatic recurrence (RR = 1.5, P = 0.4). Conclusion : Although there are no randomized trials that quantify any survival benefit from resection of liver metastases, the comparison of our results with well documented historical evidence indicates that surgical resection of up to seven colorectal liver metastases can result in a significant survival benefit.     

Repeat hepatic resection as effective treatment for recurrent colorectal liver metastases

Background: Approximately 20–40% of patients who undergo liver resection for colorectal metastases develop recurrent disease confined to the liver. The goals of this study were to determine whether the survival benefit of repeat hepatic resection justified the potential morbidity and mortality. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on all patients who underwent liver resection for colorectal cancer metastases between 1983 and 1995 (N=202). Repeat liver resections were performed on 23 patients for recurrent metastases. Results: There were no operative deaths in the 23 patients, and the postoperative morbidity rate was 22%. The 5-year actuarial survival rate after repeat resection was 32%, with a median length of survival of 39.9 months. There were three patients who survived for >5 years after repeat resection. Sixteen patients (70%) developed recurrent disease at a median interval of 11 months after the second resection; 10 of these 16 patients (62%) had new hepatic metastases. No clinical or pathological factors were significant in predicting long-term survival. Conclusions: Repeat liver resection for recurrent colorectal metastases (a) can be performed safely with acceptable mortality and morbidity rates and (b) may result in long-term survival in some patients.Presented at the 49th Annual Cancer Symposium of The Society of Surgical Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia, March 21–24, 1996.     

Resection of Hepatic Colorectal Metastases Involving the Caudate Lobe: Perioperative Outcome and Survival

Purpose: To examine clinical features and outcome of patients who underwent hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases (LM) involving the caudate lobe. Patients and Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent hepatic resection for LM from May 1990 to September 2004 were analyzed from a multicenter database. Demographics, operative data, pathologic margin status, recurrence, and survival were analyzed. Results: Of 580 patients, 40 (7%) had LM involving the caudate. Six had isolated caudate LM and 34 had LM involving the caudate plus one or more other hepatic segments. Patients with caudate LM were more likely to have synchronous primary colorectal cancer (63% vs. 36%; P = 0.01), multiple LM (70% vs. 51%; P = 0.02) and required extended hepatic resection more often than patients with non-caudate LM (60% vs. 18%; P < 0.001). Only four patients with caudate LM underwent a vascular resection; three at first operation, one after recurrence of a resected caudate tumor. All had primary repair (vena cava, n = 3; portal vein, n = 1). Perioperative complications (43% vs. 28%) and 60-day operative mortality (0% vs. 1%) were similar (caudate vs. non-caudate LM, both P > 0.05). Pathological margins were positive in 15 (38%) patients with caudate LM and in 43 (8%) with non-caudate LM (P < 0.001). At a median follow-up of 40 months, 25 (64%) patients with caudate LM recurred compared with 219 (40%) patients with non-caudate LM (P = 0.01). Patients with caudate LM were more likely to have intrahepatic disease as a component of recurrence (caudate: 51% vs. non-caudate: 25%; P = 0.001). No patient recurred on the vena cava or portal vein. Patients with caudate LM had shorter 5-year disease-free and overall survival than patients with non-caudate LM (disease-free: 24% vs. 44%; P = 0.02; overall: 41% vs. 58%; P = 0.02). Conclusions: Patients who undergo hepatic resection for caudate LM often present with multiple hepatic tumors and tumors in proximity to the major hepatic veins. Extended hepatectomy is required in the majority, although vascular resection is not frequently necessary; when performed, primary repair is usually possible. Despite resection in this population of patients with multiple and bilateral tumors, and despite close-margin and positive-margin resection in a significant proportion, recurrence on the portal vein or vena cava was not observed, and long-term survival is accomplished (41% 5-year overall survival). These data were presented at the American Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association 2006 Annual Meeting, Miami, Florida, March 12, 2006.     

Results of R0 Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases Associated With Extrahepatic Disease

Background: Extrahepatic malignant disease has always been considered an absolute contraindication to hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. This study reports the long-term outcome and prognostic factors of patients undergoing extrahepatic disease resection simultaneously with hepatectomy for liver metastases.Methods: From January 1987 to January 2001, 75 patients underwent a complete R0 resection of extrahepatic disease simultaneously with hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. They were inscribed in a registry and then prospectively followed up. They represented 25% of the 294 patients who underwent an R0 hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases during the same period.Results: The mortality rate was 2.7%, and morbidity was 25%. After a median follow-up of 4.9 years (range, 1.7–13.4 years), the overall 3- and 5-year survival rates were 45% and 28%, respectively. By using a Cox model, there was a significant difference in survival between patients with single versus multiple sites of extrahepatic disease. Also, the presence of more than five liver metastases was a significant parameter.Conclusions: Extrahepatic disease in colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases should no longer be considered as a contraindication to hepatectomy. However, this intended R0 resection cannot be performed in 50% of laparotomized patients, and negative prognostic factors for surgery include the presence of multiple extrahepatic disease sites or more than five liver metastases.     

Analysis of preoperative prognostic factors for long-term survival after hepatic resection of liver metastasis of colorectal carcinoma

Hepatic resection is the most effective therapy for liver metastasis of colorectal carcinoma. To clarify indications for this therapy, the clinicopathologic and follow-up data of 103 consecutive patients who underwent hepatic resection for metastases of colorectal carcinoma were analyzed. Factors influencing overall survival rate were investigated by multivariate analysis. Thereafter, patients who underwent resection were stratified according to the number of independent risk factors present, and their outcomes were compared with those of 14 nonresection patients with fewer than six liver tumors and without extrahepatic metastasis. The overall survival rate of the 103 resection patients was 43.1%. The clinicopathologic factors shown to affect on long-term survival after hepatic resection were the interval between colorectal and hepatic surgery (<12 months), preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level (>-10 ng/ml), and number of hepatic metastases (four or more). The 5-year overall survival rates were 75.0% with no risk factors (n = 16), 53.6% with one risk factor (n = 46), 23.0% with two risk factors (n = 36), and0%with three risk factors (n = 5). Survival rates did not differ between resection patients with three risk factors and nonresection patients. Therefore, hepatic resection may be appropriate for patients with fewer than three risk factors.