Modulation of Opioid Receptor Ligand Affinity and Efficacy Using Active and Inactive State Receptor Models

Mu opioid receptor (MOR) agonists are widely used for the treatment of pain; however, chronic use results in the development of tolerance and dependence. It has been demonstrated that coadministration of a MOR agonist with a delta opioid receptor (DOR) antagonist maintains the analgesia associated with MOR agonists, but with reduced negative side‐effects. Using our newly refined opioid receptor models for structure‐based ligand design, we have synthesized several pentapeptides with tailored affinity and efficacy profiles. In particular, we have obtained pentapeptides 8 , Tyr‐c(S‐S)[DCys‐1Nal‐Nle‐Cys]NH₂, and 12 , Tyr‐c(S‐S)[DCys‐1Nal‐Nle‐Cys]OH, which demonstrates high affinity and full agonist behavior at MOR, high affinity but very low efficacy for DOR, and minimal affinity for the kappa opioid receptor (KOR). Functional properties of these peptides as MOR agonists/DOR antagonists lacking undesired KOR activity make them promising candidates for future in vivo studies of MOR/DOR interactions. Subtle structural variation of 12 , by substituting D‐Cys⁵ for L‐Cys⁵, generated analog 13, which maintains low nanomolar MOR and DOR affinity, but which displays no efficacy at either receptor. These results demonstrate the power and utility of accurate receptor models for structure‐based ligand design, as well as the profound sensitivity of ligand function on its structure.     

Roles of residues 3 and 4 in cyclic tetrapeptide ligand recognition by the κ‐opioid receptor

Abstract: A series of cyclic, disulfide‐ or dithioether‐containing tetrapeptides based on previously reported potent μ‐ and δ‐selective analogs has been explored with the aim of improving their poor affinity to the κ‐opioid receptor. Specifically targeted were modifications of tetrapeptide residues 3 and 4, as they presumably interact with residues from transmembrane helices 6 and 7 and extracellular loop 3 that differ among the three receptors. Accordingly, tetrapeptides were synthesized with Phe³ replaced by aliphatic (Gly, Ala, Aib, Cha), basic (Lys, Arg, homo‐Arg), or aromatic sides chains (Trp, Tyr, p‐NH₂Phe), and with d ‐Pen⁴ replaced by d ‐Cys⁴, and binding affinities to stably expressed μ‐, δ‐, and κ‐receptors were determined. In general, the resulting analogs failed to exhibit appreciable affinity for the κ‐receptor, with the exception of the tetrapeptide Tyr‐c[d ‐Cys‐Phe‐d ‐Cys]‐NH₂, cyclized via a disulfide bond, which demonstrated high binding affinity toward all opioid receptors (Ki^μ = 1.26 nm , Ki^δ = 16.1 nm , Ki^κ = 38.7 nm ). Modeling of the κ‐receptor/ligand complex in the active state reveals that the receptor‐binding pocket for residues 3 and 4 of the tetrapeptide ligands is smaller than that in the μ‐receptor and requires, for optimal fit, that the tripeptide cycle of the ligand assume a higher energy conformation. The magnitude of this energy penalty depends on the nature of the fourth residue of the peptide (d ‐Pen or d ‐Cys) and correlates well with the observed κ‐receptor binding affinity.     

Development of highly potent and ective dynorphin A analogues as new medicines

Abstract: Dynorphin A (Dyn A), a 17 amino acid peptide H‐Tyr‐Gly‐Gly‐Phe‐Leu‐Arg‐Arg‐Ile‐Arg‐Pro‐Lys‐Leu‐Lys‐Trp‐Asp‐Asn‐Gln‐OH, is a potent opioid peptide which interacts preferentially with κ‐opioid receptors. Research in the development of selective and potent opioid peptide ligands for the κ‐receptor is important in mediating analgesia. Several cyclic disulphide bridge‐containing peptide analogues of Dyn A, which were conformationally constrained in the putative message or address segment of the opioid ligand, were designed, synthesized and assayed. To further investigate the conformational and topographical requirements for the residues in positions 5 and 11 of these analogues, a systematic series of Dyn A_1?11‐NH₂ cyclic analogues incorporating the sulphydryl‐containing amino acids l ‐ and d ‐Cys and l ‐ and d ‐Pen in positions 5 and 11 were synthesized and assayed. Cyclic lactam peptide analogues were also synthesized and assayed. Several of these cyclic analogues, retained the same affinity and selectivity (vs. the μ‐ and δ‐receptors) as the parent Dyn A_1?11‐NH₂ peptide in the guinea‐pig brain (GPB), but exhibited a much lower activity in the guinea‐pig ileum (GPI), thus leading to centrally vs. peripherally selective peptides. Studies of the structure–activity relationship of Dyn A peptide provide new insights into the importance of each amino acid residue (and their configurations) in Dyn A analogues for high potency and good selectivity at κ‐opioid receptors. We report herein the progress towards the development of Dyn A peptide ligands, which can act as agonists or antagonists at cell surface receptors that modulate cell function and animal behaviour using various approaches to rational peptide ligand‐based drug design.     

Potent Opioid Peptide Agonists Containing 4′‐[N‐((4′‐phenyl)‐phenethyl)carboxamido]phenylalanine (Bcp) in Place of Tyr

Analogues of the opioid peptides H‐Tyr‐c[d ‐Cys‐Gly‐Phe(pNO₂)‐d ‐Cys]NH₂ (non‐selective), H‐Tyr‐d ‐Arg‐Phe‐Lys‐NH₂ (μ‐selective) and dynorphin A(1‐11)‐NH₂ (κ‐selective) containing 4′‐[N‐((4′‐phenyl)‐phenethyl)carboxamido]phenylanine (Bcp) in place of Tyr¹ were synthesized. All three Bcp¹‐opioid peptides retained high μ opioid receptor binding affinity, but showed very significant differences in the opioid receptor selectivity profiles as compared with the corresponding Tyr¹‐containing parent peptides. The cyclic peptide H‐Bcp‐c[d ‐Cys‐Gly‐Phe(pNO₂)‐d ‐Cys]NH₂ turned out to be an extraordinarily potent, μ‐selective opioid agonist, whereas the Bcp¹‐analogue of dynorphin A(1‐11)‐NH₂ displayed partial agonism at the μ receptor. The obtained results suggest that the large biphenylethyl substituent contained in these compounds may engage in a hydrophobic interaction with a receptor subsite and thereby may play a role in the ligand’s ability to induce a specific receptor conformation or to bind to a distinct receptor conformation in a situation of conformational receptor heterogeneity.     

An affinity label for δ‐opioid receptors derived from [d‐Ala2]deltorphin I*

Abstract: A series of potential affinity label derivatives of the amphibian opioid peptide [d ‐Ala²]deltorphin I were prepared by incorporation at the para position of Phe³ (in the ‘message’ sequence) or Phe⁵ (in the ‘address’ sequence) of an electrophilic group (i.e. isothiocyanate or bromoacetamide). The introduction of the electrophile was accomplished by incorporating Fmoc‐Phe(p‐NHAlloc) into the peptide, followed later in the synthesis by selective deprotection of the Alloc group and modification of the resulting amine. While para substitution decreased the δ‐opioid receptor affinity, selected analogs retained nanomolar affinity for δ receptors. [d ‐Ala²,Phe(p‐NCS)³]deltorphin I exhibited moderate affinity (IC₅₀ = 83 nm ) and high selectivity for δ receptors, while the corresponding amine and bromoacetamide derivatives showed pronounced decreases in δ‐receptor affinity (80‐ and >1200‐fold, respectively, compared with [d ‐Ala²]deltorphin I). In the ‘address’ sequence, the Phe(p‐NH₂)⁵ derivative showed the highest δ‐receptor affinity (IC₅₀ = 32 nm ), while the Phe(p‐NHCOCH₂Br)⁵ and Phe(p‐NCS)⁵ peptides displayed four‐ and tenfold lower δ‐receptor affinities, respectively. [d ‐Ala²,Phe(p‐NCS)³]deltorphin I exhibited wash‐resistant inhibition of [³H][d ‐Pen²,D‐Pen⁵]enkephalin (DPDPE) binding to δ receptors at a concentration of 80 nm . [d ‐Ala², Phe(p‐NCS)³]deltorphin I represents the first affinity label derivative of one of the potent and selective amphibian opioid peptides, and the first electrophilic affinity label derivative of an agonist containing the reactive functionality in the ‘message’ sequence of the peptide.     

Modifications of the cyclic mu receptor selective tetrapeptide Tyr‐c[d‐Cys‐Phe‐d‐Pen]NH2 (Et): effects on opioid receptor binding and activation

Abstract: The previously described cyclic mu opioid receptor‐selective tetrapeptide Tyr‐c[d ‐Cys‐Phe‐d ‐Pen]NH₂ (Et) (JOM‐6) was modified at residues 1 and 3 by substitution with various natural and synthetic amino acids, and/or by alteration of the cyclic system. Effects on mu and delta opioid receptor binding affinities, and on potencies and efficacies as measured by the [³⁵S]‐GTPγS assay, were evaluated. Affinities at mu and delta receptors were not influenced dramatically by substitution of Tyr¹ with conformationally restricted phenolic amino acids. In the [³⁵S]‐GTPγS assay, all of the peptides tested exhibited a maximal response comparable with that of fentanyl at the mu opioid receptor, and all showed high potency, in the range0.4–9 nm . However, potency changes did not always correlate with affinity, suggesting that the conformation required for binding and the conformation required for activation of the opioid receptors are different. At the delta opioid receptor, none of the peptides were able to produce a response equivalent to that of the full delta agonist BW 373,U86 and only one had an EC₅₀ value of less than 100 nm . Lastly, we have identified a peptide, d ‐Hat‐c[d ‐Cys‐Phe‐d ‐Pen]NH₂ (Et), with high potency and > 1000‐fold functional selectivity for the mu over delta opioid receptor as measured by the [³⁵S]‐GTPγS assay.     

Cyclic enkephalin analogs containing various para‐substituted phenylalanine derivatives in place of Tyr1 are potent opioid agonists*

Abstract: The cyclic enkephalin analog H‐Tyr‐c[d ‐Cys‐Gly‐Phe(pNO₂)‐d ‐Cys]NH₂ is a highly potent opioid agonist with IC₅₀s of 35 pm and 19 pm in the guinea‐pig ileum (GPI) and mouse vas deferens (MVD) assays, respectively. The Phe¹‐analog of this peptide showed 370‐fold and 6790‐fold lower agonist potency in the GPI and MVD assays, respectively, indicating the importance of the Tyr¹ hydroxyl‐group in the interaction with μ and δ opioid receptors. In the present study, the effect of various substituents (‐NH₂, ‐NO₂, ‐CN, ‐CH₃, ‐COOH, ‐COCH₃, ‐CONH₂) introduced in the para‐position of the Phe¹‐residue of H‐Phe‐c[d ‐Cys‐Gly‐Phe(pNO₂)‐d ‐Cys]NH₂ on the in vitro opioid activity profile was examined. Most analogs showed enhanced μ and δ agonist potencies in the two bioassays, except for the Phe(pCOOH)¹‐analog, which was weakly active, probably as a consequence of the negative charge. The most potent compounds were the Phe(pCOH₃)¹‐ and the Phe(pCONH₂)¹‐analogs. The latter compound showed subnanomolar μ and δ agonist potencies and represents the most potent enkephalin analog lacking the Tyr¹ hydroxyl‐group reported to date. Taken together, these results indicate that various substituents introduced in the para‐position of Phe¹ enhance opioid activity via hydrogen bonding or hydrophobic interactions with the receptor. Comparison with existing structure‐activity relationship on phenolic hydroxyl replacements in morphinans indicates that these nonpeptide opiates and some of the cyclic enkephalin analogs described here may have different modes of binding to the receptor.     

Cyclic Opioid Peptide Agonists and Antagonists Obtained Via Ring‐Closing Metathesis

The opioid peptide H‐Tyr‐c[D‐Cys‐Phe‐Phe‐Cys]NH₂ cyclized via a methylene dithiother is a potent and selective μ opioid agonist (Przydial M.J. et al., J Peptide Res, 66, 2005, 255). Dicarba analogues of this peptide with Tyr, 2′,6′‐dimethyltyrosine (Dmt), 3‐[2,6‐dimethyl‐4‐hydroxyphenyl)propanoic acid (Dhp) or (2S)‐2‐methyl‐3‐(2,6‐dimethyl‐4‐hydroxyphenyl)propanoic acid [(2S)‐Mdp] in the 1‐position were prepared. The peptides were synthesized on solid‐phase by substituting d ‐allylglycine and (2S)‐2‐amino‐5‐hexenoic acid in position 2 and 5, respectively, followed by ring‐closing metathesis. Mixtures of cis and trans isomers of the resulting olefinic peptides were obtained, and catalytic hydrogenation yielded the saturated –CH₂–CH₂– bridged peptides. All six Tyr¹‐ and Dmt¹‐dicarba analogues retained high μ and δ opioid agonist potency and showed only slight or no preference for μ over δ receptors. As expected, the six Dhp¹‐ and (2S)‐Mdp¹‐dicarba analogues turned out to be μ opioid antagonists but, surprisingly, displayed a range of different efficacies (agonism, partial agonism or antagonism) at the δ receptor. The obtained results indicate that the μ versus δ receptor selectivity and the efficacy at the δ receptor of these cyclic peptides depend on distinct conformational characteristics of the 15‐membered peptide ring structure, which may affect the spatial positioning of the exocyclic residue and of the Phe³ and Phe⁴ side chains.     

Synthesis, binding affinity, and functional in vitro activity of 3-benzylaminomorphinan and 3-benzylaminomorphine ligands at opioid receptors

A series of 3-benzylamino-3-desoxymorphinan (I) and 3-benzylamino-3-desoxymorphine (II) derivatives were synthesized and evaluated for their binding affinities, and functional activity data are presented at MOR, KOR, and DOR. Some of these ligands were found to have high binding affinity at MOR and KOR and displayed increased selectivity at MOR over KOR and DOR compared to butorphan or cyclorphan. The most selective compound, 3-(3'-hydroxybenzyl)amino-17-methylmorphinan (4g) (24-fold MOR to KOR and 1700-fold MOR to DOR) also showed high binding affinity (0.42 nM to MOR) and was a full agonist in the [(35)S]GTPγS binding assay. 2-(3'-Hydroxybenzyl)amino-17-cyclopropylmethylmorphinan (17) was found to be a KOR-selective ligand (150-fold over MOR and >10000-fold over the DORs). Most 3-benzylaminomorphinan derivatives were partial agonists at MOR and full agonists at KOR in the [(35)S]GTPγS binding assay.     

Binding of endomorphin‐2 to μ‐opioid receptors in experimental mouse mammary adenocarcinoma

Abstract: Endomorphin‐2 (Tyr‐Pro‐Phe‐Phe‐NH₂) binds with high affinity and selectivity to the μ‐opioid receptor. In the present study, [¹²⁵I]endomorphin‐2 has been used to characterize μ‐opioid‐binding sites on transplantable mouse mammary adenocarcinoma cells. Cold saturation experiments performed with [¹²⁵I]endomorphin‐2 (1 nm ) show biphasic binding curves in Scatchard coordinates. One component represents high affinity and low capacity (K_d = 18.79 ± 1.13 nm , B_max = 635 ± 24 fmol/mg protein) and the other shows low affinity and higher capacity (K_d = 7.67 ± 0.81 μm , B_max = 157 ± 13 pmol/mg protein) binding sites. The rank order of agonists competing for the [¹²⁵I]endomorphin‐2 binding site was [d ‐1‐Nal³]morphiceptin > endomorphin‐2 ? [d ‐Phe³]morphiceptin > morphiceptin > [d ‐1‐Nal³]endomorphin‐2, indicating binding of these peptides to μ‐opioid receptors. The uptake of ¹³¹I‐labeled peptides administered intraperitoneally to tumor‐bearing mice was also investigated. The highest accumulation in the tumor was observed for [d ‐1‐Nal³]morphiceptin, which reached the value of 8.19 ± 1.14% dose/g tissue.     

Effects of single d‐amino acid substitutions on disruption of β‐sheet structure and hydrophobicity in cyclic 14‐residue antimicrobial peptide analogs related to gramicidin S

Abstract: Gramicidin S (GS) is a 10‐residue cyclic β‐sheet peptide with lytic activity against the membranes of both microbial and human cells, i.e. it possesses little to no biologic specificity for either cell type. Structure–activity studies of de novo‐designed 14‐residue cyclic peptides based on GS have previously shown that higher specificity against microbial membranes, i.e. a high therapeutic index (TI), can be achieved by the replacement of a single l ‐amino acid with its corresponding d ‐enantiomer [Kondejewski, L.H. et al. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274 , 13181]. The diastereomer with a d ‐Lys substituted at position 4 caused the greatest improvement in specificity vs. other l to d substitutions within the cyclic 14‐residue peptide GS14, through a combination of decreased peptide amphipathicity and disrupted β‐sheet structure in aqueous conditions [McInnes, C. et al. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275 , 14287]. Based on this information, we have created a series of peptide diastereomers substituted only at position 4 by a d ‐ or l ‐amino acid (Leu, Phe, Tyr, Asn, Lys, and achiral Gly). The amino acids chosen in this study represent a range of hydrophobicities/hydrophilicities as a subset of the 20 naturally occurring amino acids. While the d ‐ and l ‐substitutions of Leu, Phe, and Tyr all resulted in strong hemolytic activity, the substitutions of hydrophilic d ‐amino acids d ‐Lys and d ‐Asn in GS14 at position 4 resulted in weaker hemolytic activity than in the l ‐diastereomers, which demonstrated strong hemolysis. All of the l ‐substitutions also resulted in poor antimicrobial activity and an extremely low TI, while the antimicrobial activity of the d ‐substituted peptides tended to improve based on the hydrophilicity of the residue. d ‐Lys was the most polar and most efficacious substitution, resulting in the highest TI. Interestingly, the hydrophobic d ‐amino acid substitutions had superior antimicrobial activity vs. the l ‐enantiomers although substitution of a hydrophobic d ‐amino acid increases the nonpolar face hydrophobicity. These results further support the role of hydrophobicity of the nonpolar face as a major influence on microbial specificity, but also highlights the importance of a disrupted β‐sheet structure on antimicrobial activity.     

Chemical synthesis and receptor binding of catfish somatostatin: a disulfide‐bridged β‐d‐Galp‐(1→3)‐α‐d‐GalpNAc O‐glycopeptide*

Abstract: The glycopeptide hormone catfish somatostatin (somatostatin‐22) has the amino acid sequence H‐Asp‐Asn‐Thr‐Val‐Thr‐Ser‐Lys‐Pro‐Leu‐Asn‐Cys‐Met‐Asn‐Tyr‐Phe‐Trp‐Lys‐Ser‐Arg‐Thr‐Ala‐Cys‐OH; it includes a cyclic disulfide connecting the two Cys residues, and the major naturally occurring glycoform contains d ‐GalNAc and d ‐Gal O‐glycosidically linked to Thr⁵. The linear sequence was assembled smoothly starting with an Fmoc‐Cys(Trt)‐PAC‐PEG‐PS support, using stepwise Fmoc solid‐phase chemistry. In addition to the nonglycosylated peptide, two glycosylated forms of somatostatin‐22 were accessed by incorporating as building blocks, respectively, N^α‐Fmoc‐Thr(Ac₃‐α‐D‐GalNAc)‐OH and N^α‐Fmoc‐Thr(Ac₄‐β‐D‐Gal‐(1→3)‐Ac₂‐α‐D‐GalNAc)‐OH. Acidolytic deprotection/cleavage of these peptidyl‐resins with trifluoroacetic acid/scavenger cocktails gave the corresponding acetyl‐protected glycopeptides with free sulfhydryl functions. Deacetylation, by methanolysis in the presence of catalytic sodium methoxide, was followed by mild oxidation at pH 7, mediated by N^α‐dithiasuccinoyl (Dts)‐glycine, to provide the desired monomeric cyclic disulfides. The purified peptides were tested for binding affinities to a panel of cloned human somatostatin receptor subtypes; in several cases, presence of the disaccharide moiety resulted in 2‐fold tighter binding.     

Novel endomorphin‐2 analogs with μ‐opioid receptor antagonist activity

Abstract: A series of position 4‐substituted endomorphin‐2 (Tyr‐Pro‐Phe‐Phe‐NH₂) analogs containing 3‐(1‐naphthyl)‐alanine (1‐Nal) or 3‐(2‐naphthyl)‐alanine (2‐Nal) in l ‐ or d ‐configuration, was synthesized. The opioid activity profiles of these peptides were determined in the μ‐opioid receptor representative binding assay and in the Guinea‐Pig Ileum assay/Mouse Vas Deferens assay (GPI/MVD) bioassays in vitro, as well as in the mouse hot‐plate test of analgesia in vivo. In the binding assay the affinity of all new analogs for the μ‐opioid receptor was reduced compared with endomorphin‐2. The two most potent analogs were [d ‐1‐Nal⁴]‐ and [d ‐2‐Nal⁴]endomorphin‐2, with IC₅₀ values 14 ± 1.25 and 19 ± 2.1 nm , respectively, compared with 1.9 ± 0.21 nm for endomorphin‐2. In the GPI assay these analogs were found to be weak antagonists and they were inactive in the MVD assay. The in vitro GPI assay results were in agreement with those obtained in the in vivo hot‐plate test. Antinociception induced by endomorphin‐2 was reversed by concomitant intracerebroventricula (i.c.v.) administration of [d ‐1‐Nal⁴]‐ and [d ‐2‐Nal⁴]‐endomorphin‐2, indicating that these analogs were μ‐opioid antagonists. Their antagonist activity was compared with that of naloxone. At a dose 5 μg per animal naloxone almost completely inhibited antinociceptive action of endomorphin‐2, while [d ‐1‐Nal⁴]endomorphin‐2 in about 46%.     

Tuned-Affinity Bivalent Ligands for the Characterization of Opioid Receptor Heteromers

相似文献   

Dermorphin‐based potential affinity labels for µ‐opioid receptors*

Abstract: Dermorphin and [Lys⁷]dermorphin, selective µ‐opioid receptor ligands originating from amphibian skin, have been modified with various electrophiles in either the ‘message’ or ‘address’ sequences as potential peptide‐based affinity labels for µ‐receptors. Introduction of the electrophilic isothiocyanate and bromoacetamide groups on the para position of Phe³ and Phe⁵ was accomplished by incorporating Fmoc‐Phe(p‐NHAlloc) into the peptide followed by selective deprotection and modification. The corresponding amine‐containing peptides were also prepared. The pure peptides were evaluated in radioligand binding experiments using Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing µ‐ and δ‐opioid receptors. In dermorphin, introduction of the electrophilic groups in the ‘message’ domain lowered the binding affinity by > 1000‐fold; only [Phe(p‐NH₂)³]dermorphin retained nanomolar affinity for µ‐receptors. Modifications in the ‘address’ region of both dermorphin and [Lys⁷]dermorphin were relatively well tolerated. In particular, [Phe(p‐NH₂)⁵,Lys⁷]dermorphin showed similar affinity to dermorphin, with almost 2‐fold higher selectivity for µ‐receptors. [Phe(p‐NHCOCH₂Br)⁵]‐ and [Phe(p‐NHCOCH₂Br)⁵,Lys⁷]dermorphin exhibited relatively high affinity (IC₅₀ = 27.7 and 15.1 nm , respectively) for µ‐receptors. However, neither of these peptides inhibited [³H]DAMGO binding in a wash‐resistant manner.     

Synthesis and biological evaluation of constrained analogues of the opioid peptide H‐Tyr‐d‐Ala‐Phe‐Gly‐NH2 using the 4‐amino‐2‐benzazepin‐3‐one scaffold

Abstract: The synthesis of conformationally restricted dipeptidic moieties 4‐amino‐1,2,4,5‐tetrahydro‐2‐benzazepin‐3‐one (Aba)‐Gly ([(4S)‐amino‐3‐oxo‐1,2,4,5‐tetrahydro‐1H‐2‐benzazepin‐2‐yl]‐acetic acid) and 8‐hydroxy‐4‐amino‐1,2,4,5‐tetrahydro‐2‐benzazepin‐3‐one (Hba)‐d ‐Ala ([(4S)‐amino‐8‐hydroxy‐3‐oxo‐1,2,4,5‐tetrahydro‐benzo[c]azepin‐2‐yl]‐propionic acid) was based on a synthetic strategy that uses an oxazolidinone as an N‐acyliminium precursor. Introducing these Aba scaffolds into the N‐terminal tetrapeptide of dermorphin (H‐Tyr‐d ‐Ala‐Phe‐Gly‐Tyr‐Pro‐Ser‐NH₂)‐induced remarkable shifts in affinity and selectivity towards the opioid μ‐ and δ‐receptors. This paper provides the synthesis and biological in vitro and in vivo evaluation of constricted analogues of the N‐terminal tetrapeptide H‐Tyr‐d ‐Ala‐Phe‐Gly‐NH₂, which is the minimal subunit of dermorphin needed for dermorphin‐like opiate activity.     

Design,Synthesis and Pharmacological Characterization of Endomorphin Analogues with Non‐Cyclic Amino Acid Residues in Position 2

Abstract: A series of endomorphin‐1 (EM‐1) and endomorphin‐2 (EM‐2) analogues, containing non‐cyclic amino acids (Ala, d ‐Ala, β‐Ala, NMeAla, d ‐NMeAla or Sar) instead of Pro in position 2 was synthesized, where NMeAla = N‐methylalanine and Sar = N‐methylglycine, sarcosine. The opioid activity profiles of these peptides were determined in μ and δ opioid receptor (MOR and DOR)‐representative binding assays and bioassays in vitro, as well as in the mouse hot‐plate test in vivo. Finally, the degradation rates of all analogues in the presence of either rat brain homogenate or selected proteolytic enzymes were determined. Analogues of EM‐2 were generally more potent than the respective analogues of EM‐1. EM‐2 analogues with d ‐Ala or d ‐NMeAla were about twofold more potent than the parent peptide and were least prone to degradation by brain homogenate, dipeptydyl peptidase IV and aminopeptidase M. In the in vivo test, [d ‐Ala²]EM‐2 and [d ‐NMeAla²]EM‐2 showed much higher analgesic potency than EM‐2 which confirmed the usefulness of structural modifications in obtaining new leads for pain‐relief therapeutics.     

Determination of stereochemistry stability coefficients of amino acid side‐chains in an amphipathic α‐helix

Abstract: We describe here a systematic study to determine the effect on secondary structure of d ‐amino acid substitutions in the nonpolar face of an amphipathic α‐helical peptide. The helix‐destabilizing ability of 19 d ‐amino acid residues in an amphipathic α‐helical model peptide was evaluated by reversed‐phase HPLC and CD spectroscopy. l ‐Amino acid and d ‐amino acid residues show a wide range of helix‐destabilizing effects relative to Gly, as evidenced in melting temperatures (ΔT_m) ranging from ?8.5°C to 30.5°C for the l ‐amino acids and ?9.5°C to 9.0°C for the d ‐amino acids. Helix stereochemistry stability coefficients defined as the difference in T_m values for the l ‐ and d ‐amino acid substitutions [(ΔT_m′ = T_mL and T_mD)] ranging from 1°C to 34.5°C. HPLC retention times [Δt_R(X_L?X_D)] also had values ranging from ?0.52 to 7.31 min at pH 7.0. The helix‐destabilizing ability of a specific d ‐amino acid is highly dependent on its side‐chain, with no clear relationship to the helical propensity of its corresponding l ‐enantiomers. In both CD and reversed‐phase HPLC studies, d ‐amino acids with β‐branched side‐chains destabilize α‐helical structure to the greatest extent. A series of helix stability coefficients was subsequently determined, which should prove valuable both for protein structure‐activity studies and de novo design of novel biologically active peptides.     

Type and location of fluorescent probes incorporated into the potent μ‐opioid peptide [Dmt1]DALDA affect potency,receptor selectivity and intrinsic efficacy*

Abstract: The dermorphin‐derived tetrapeptide H‐Dmt‐d ‐Arg‐Phe‐Lys‐NH₂ (Dmt = 2′,6′‐dimethyltyrosine) ([Dmt¹]DALDA) is a highly potent and selective μ‐opioid agonist capable of crossing the blood–brain barrier and producing a potent, centrally mediated analgesic effect when given systemically. For the purpose of biodistribution studies by fluorescence techniques, [Dmt¹]DALDA analogues containing various fluorescent labels [dansyl, anthraniloyl (atn), fluorescein, or 6‐dimethylamino‐2′‐naphthoyl] in several different locations of the peptide were synthesized and characterized in vitro in the guinea‐pig ileum and mouse vas deferens assays, and in μ‐, δ‐ and κ‐opioid receptor‐binding assays. The analogues showed various degrees of μ receptor‐binding selectivity, but all of them were less μ‐selective than the [Dmt¹]DALDA parent peptide. Most analogues retained potent, full μ‐agonist activity, except for one with fluorescein attached at the C‐terminus ( 3a ) (partial μ‐agonist) and one containing β‐(6′‐dimethylamino‐2′‐naphthoyl)alanine (aladan) in place of Phe³ ( 4 ) (μ‐ and κ‐antagonist). The obtained data indicate that the receptor‐binding affinity, receptor selectivity and intrinsic efficacy of the prepared analogues vary very significantly, depending on the type of fluorescent label used and on its location in the peptide. The results suggest that the biological activity profile of fluorescence‐labeled peptide analogues should always be carefully determined prior to their use in biodistribution studies or other studies. One of the analogues containing the atn group ( 2a ) proved highly useful in a study of cellular uptake and intracellular distribution by confocal laser scanning microscopy.     

NPYFa,A Chimeric Peptide of Met‐Enkephalin,and NPFF Induces Tolerance‐Free Analgesia

Methionine‐enkephalin‐Arg‐Phe is an endogenous amphiactive analgesic peptide. Neuropeptide FF, on the other hand, is reported for its role in opioid modulation and tolerance development. Based on these reports, in the present study we designed a chimeric peptide NPYFa (YGGFMKKKPQRFamide), having the Met‐enkephalin (opioid) and PQRFamide sequence of neuropeptide FF, which can then target both the opioid and neuropeptide FF receptors. We hypothesized that the chimeric peptide so designed would have both analgesic properties and further aid in understanding of the role of neuropeptide FF in the development of opiate tolerance. Our studies indicated that NPYFa induced an early onset, potent, dose‐dependent and prolonged antinociception. Additionally, antagonists (MOR, KOR, and DOR) pretreatment studies determined a KOR‐mediated antinociception activity of the ligand. Further, in vitro binding studies using the Eu‐GTP‐γS binding assay on cell lines expressing opioid and NPFF receptors showed binding to both the opioid and neuropeptide FF receptors suggesting a multiple receptor binding character of NPYFa. Moreover, chronic (6 days) treatment with NPYFa exhibited an absence of tolerance development subsequent to its analgesia. The current study proposes NPYFa as a potent, long‐acting antinociceptor lacking tolerance development as well as a probe to study opioid analgesia and the associated complex mechanisms of tolerance development.