Complexity of the thoracic spine pedicle anatomy

Transpedicular screw fixation provides rigid stabilization of the thoracolumbar spine. For accurate insertion of screws into the pedicles and to avoid pedicle cortex perforations, more precise knowledge of the anatomy of the pedicles is necessary. This study was designed to visualize graphically the surface anatomy and internal architecture of the pedicles of the thoracic spine. Fifteen vertebrae distributed equally among the upper, middle, and lower thoracic regions were used. For the purpose of mapping surface anatomy, each pedicle was cleaned, spraypainted white, and marked with more than 100 fine points. Using an optoelectronic digitizer, three-dimensional coordinates of the marked points and three additonal points, representing a coordiate system, were digitized. A solid modeling computer program was used to create three-dimensional surface images of the pedicle. To obtain cross-sectional information, each pedicle was sectioned with a thin diamond-blade saw to obtain four slices, 1 mm in thcikness and 0.5 mm apart. The pedicle slices were X-rayed and projected onto a digitizer. The internal and external contours were digitized and converted into graphs by a computer. The pedicles exhibited significant variability in their shape and orientation, not only from region to region within the thoracic spine, but also within the same region and even within the same pedicle. These variations are extremely significant in light of current techniques utilized in transpedicular screw fixation in the thoracic spine. Information documenting the three-dimensional complexity of pedicle anatomy should be valuable for surgeons and investigators interested in spinal instrumentation.     

Transpedicular screw placement: image-guided versus lateral-view fluoroscopy: in vitro simulation.

STUDY DESIGN: In vitro evaluation of monitoring screw placement using an image-guided system compared with the routine use of an image intensifier. OBJECTIVES: To compare a new computer-guided method of monitoring pedicle screw placement with a well-known method of monitoring using an image intensifier, using measurements of screw placement time and accuracy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pedicle screw placement relies on the identification of anatomic landmarks for the point of entry of the pedicle. The direction and depth of screw penetration are guided by an intraoperative lateral-view image intensifier. The use of frameless stereotaxy for computer-aided pedicle screw placement may increase the accuracy and safety of the screw insertion. To the authors' knowledge, there are no published data comparing these systems on the basis of operative time and screw placement accuracy. METHOD: Eight human cadaveric sections of five vertebrae each were used for an in vitro simulation of pedicle screw placement. Four spine surgeons were chosen to simulate the transpedicular screw placement. Each surgeon placed one screw into each pedicle of two spine sections (10 vertebrae, 20 screws). The surgeon was assisted by the lateral-view image intensifier on one spine section and by the navigational system on the second one. The four surgeons placed 80 pedicle screws. Forty screw placements were monitored by fluoroscopy and 40 by the image-guided navigational system. The time spent to place one screw was recorded, as well as the remarks by each surgeons on each method. Spines were rescanned, and the positions of the screws were compared between the group on which the image intensifier has been used and the group on which the navigational system had been used. RESULTS: In the image-guided technique group, one thoracic screw disrupted the lateral cortex of the pedicle, the average distance to the anterior wall of the body was 5 mm, and the average time for the insertion of one screw was 13.5 minutes. In the other group, two screws disrupted the inner cortex of a thoracic pedicle, the average distance to the anterior wall was 10.7 mm, and the average time for the insertion of one screw was 4 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: In vitro computer-aided pedicle screw insertion is more accurate than lateral-view fluoroscopy in the thoracic spine. The main disadvantage is the time consumption compared with that required by lateral-view fluoroscopy. The total time of the surgical operation should be decreased with the future development of these techniques.     

Genauigkeit der CT-basierten Navigation von Pedikelschrauben an der Brustwirbelsäule im Vergleich zur konventionellen Technik

The goal of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of CT-based computer-assisted pedicle screw insertion in the thoracic spine in patients with fractures, metastases, and spondylodiscitis compared to a conventional technique. A total of 324 pedicle screws were inserted in the thoracic spines of 85 patients: 211 screws were placed using a CT-based optoelectronic navigation system assisted by an image intensifier and 113 screws were placed with a conventional technique. Screw positions were evaluated with postoperative CT scans by an independent radiologist. In the computer-assisted group, 174 (82.5%) screws were found completely within their pedicles compared with 77 (68.1%) correctly placed screws in the conventional group ( p<0.003). Despite use of the navigation system, 1.9% of the computer-assisted screws perforated the pedicle wall by more than 4 mm. The additional use of the image intensifier helped to identify the correct vertebral body and avoided cranial or caudal pedicle wall perforations.     

Biomechanical study on pullout strength of thoracic extrapedicular screw fixation

Objective:To identify the biomechanical feasibility of the thoracic extrapedicular approach to the placement of screws. Methods:Five fresh adult cadaveric thoracic spine from T1 to T8 were harvested. The screw was inserted either by pedicular approach or extrapedicular approach. The result was observed and the pullout strength by pedicular screw approach and extrapedicular screw approach via sagittal axis of the vertebrale was measured and compared statistically. Results:In thoracic pedicular approach, the pullout strength of pedicle screw was 1001.23 N±220 N (288.2-1561.7 N) and that of thoracic extrapedicular screw approach was 827.01 N±260 N when screw was inserted into the vertebrae through transverse process,and 954.25 N±254 N when screw was inserted into the vertebrae through the lateral cortex of the pedicle. Compared with pedicular group, the pullout strength in extrapedicular group was decreased by 4.7% inserted through transverse process (P>0.05) and by 17.3% inserted through the lateral cortex (P<0.05). The mean pullout strength by extrapedicular approach was decreased by 11.04% as compared with pedicular approach (P<0.05). Conclusions:It is feasible biomechanically to use extrapedicular screw technique to insert pedicular screws in the thoracic spine when it is hard to insert by pedicular approach.     

Pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: a randomized comparison study of computer-assisted navigation and conventional techniques

Objective： To evaluate the accuracy of computer-assisted pedicle screw installation and its clinical benefit as compared with conventional pedicle screw installation techniques.
Methods： Total 176 thoracic pedicle screws placed in 42 thoracic fracture patients were involved in the study randomly, 20 patients under conventional fluoroscopic control （84 screws） and 22 patients had screw insertion under three dimensional （3D） computer-assisted navigation （92 screws）. The 2 groups were compared for accuracy of screw placement, time for screw insertion by postoperative thincut CT scans and statistical analysis by χ^2 test. The cortical perforations were then graded by 2-mm increments： Grade Ⅰ （good, no cortical perforation）, Grade Ⅱ （screw outside the pedicle 〈2 mm）, Grade Ⅲ （screw outside the pedicle 〉2 mm）.
Results： In computer assisted group, 88 （95.65%） were Grade Ⅰ （good）, 4 （4.35%） were Grade Ⅱ （〈2mm）, no Grade Ⅲ （〉2 mm） violations. In conventional group, there were 14 cortical violations （16.67%）, 70 （83.33%） were Grade Ⅰ （good）, Ⅱ （13.1%） were Grade Ⅱ （〈2 mm）, and 3 （3,57%） were Grade Ⅲ （〉2 mm） violations （P〈0.001）. The number （19.57%） of upper thoracic pedicle screws （ T1-T4 ） inserted under 3D computer-assisted navigation was significantly higher than that （3.57%） by conventional fluoroscopic control （P〈0.001）. Average screw insertion time in conventional group was （4.56 ±1.03） min and （2.54 ± 0.63） min in computer assisted group （P〈0.001）. In the conventional group, one patient had pleura injury and one had a minor dura violation.
Conclusions： This study provides further evidence that 3D computer-assisted navigation placement ofpedicle screws can increase accuracy, reduce surgical time, and be performed safely and effectively at all levels of the thoracic spine, particularly upper thoracic spine.     

快速成型个体化导航模板辅助胸椎椎弓根螺钉置入可行性研究

[目的]通过尸体标本实验的方法探讨个体化导航模板辅助胸椎椎弓根螺钉置入的准确性及可行性.[方法]对6具胸椎尸体标本进行CT扫描,根据CT扫描资料,利用逆向工程原理及快速成型技术设计制造出个体化导航模板,利用个体化导航模板在尸体标本上辅助置入胸椎椎弓根螺钉,所有螺钉的置入由同一位具有腰椎椎弓根螺钉置钉经验但无胸椎椎弓根螺钉置钉经验的骨科医师进行操作,随后采用大体解剖的方法肉眼观察置钉的准确性;并根据螺钉是否穿破椎弓根、穿出距离及穿破方向进行分级.[结果]共设计制作了72个个体化导航模板辅助置入胸椎椎弓根螺钉144枚,132枚(91.7%)螺钉完全在椎弓根内;12(8.3%)枚螺钉穿破椎弓根,其中2枚螺钉穿破椎弓根内侧壁(穿破距离分别为0.6、0.8 mm),10枚螺钉穿破椎弓根外侧壁(9枚螺钉穿出距离<2 mm,1枚螺钉穿出距离为2.5 mm);没有椎弓根上方、下方及椎体前方穿破的螺钉.所有穿破椎弓根壁的螺钉均在安全可接受的范围内.[结论]快速成型个体化导航模板辅助胸椎椎弓根螺钉置入准确率高,对术者无特别的经验要求,手术操作简单、安全,可避免术中放射性损伤,为胸椎椎弓根螺钉的置入提供了一种新的可行方法,尤其适用于初学者.     

Navigation at the spine

Computer aided and computer navigated operative techniques have been used for the first time in neurosurgery and surgery of the spine. For computer aided surgery of the spine there are currently two different methods: CT-based and C-arm based techniques. The advantage of the CT-based technique is its accuracy especially in difficult anatomical regions like the cervical and upper thoracic spine, and the possibility of preoperative planning. The advantage of C-arm navigation is the broad intraoperative availability with the disadvantage of limited image quality in some regions of the spine eg, the upper thoracic spine. This last disadvantage has been dramatically improved by introducing 3-D C-arm navigation (ISO C 3-D, Siemens, GER). Generally, all methods enhance the precision of pedicle screw insertion. Clinical as well as experimental studies show an exact pedicle screw position using the computer navigated techniques in over 90% of cases. C-arm based navigational techniques are being constantly improved and the future will be CT-like images with instant intraoperative availability.     

Triggered electromyographic threshold for accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw placement in a porcine model.

STUDY DESIGN: A porcine model of thoracic pedicle screw insertion was used to determine the effect of screw position on triggered electromyographic response. OBJECTIVE: To develop a model of intraoperative detection of misplaced thoracic pedicle screws. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Triggered electromyographic stimulation has been a valuable aid in determining appropriate placement of lumbar pedicle screws. The use of pedicle screws is increasing in the thoracic spine. Misplaced thoracic pedicle screws may have significant implications if the spinal cord is injured. This study was an attempt to determine whether the established lumbar model can be used for thoracic pedicle screws. METHODS: Five 120- to 150-lb domestic pigs had 85 pedicle screws placed bilaterally in the thoracic spine at each level from T6 to T15. Screws were inserted entirely in the pedicle (Group A). After removal of the medial pedicle wall, the screws were reinserted in the pedicle with no neural contact (Group B). The screws were then placed with purposeful contact with the neural elements (Group C). The screws were stimulated, eliciting an electromyographic response in the intercostal muscles for each instrumented level. The type of response noted was classified as either primary (response from appropriate nerve root), secondary (response at different root) or no response (response at different root, no response at appropriate root). RESULTS: Two hundred fifty responses were recorded. A primary response was noted in 72% of recordings. There was a relatively consistent decrease in the triggered electromyographic response from Group A (mean 4.15 +/- 1.80 mA) to Group C (mean 3.02 +/- 2.53 mA) screws (P = 0.0003). There was little difference in the response obtained from Group A to Group B (mean 4.37 +/- 2.48 mA) screws (P > 0.05). When a primary response was recorded, the mean threshold electromyographic response recorded was significantly lower than recordings with secondary and no response recordings (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Even though there was a consistent decrease between the A and C screws that was more definitively separated when a primary response was elicited, it was not possible to determine a cutoff trigger electromyographic level that would consistently differentiate intraosseous from epidural pedicle screw placement. Furthermore, this method could not differentiate screws clearly in the pedicle from screws with medial pedicle wall breakthrough. A more direct method of spinal cord monitoring must be established to provide the surgeon with early warning of the potential of neural injury in the placement of thoracic pedicle screws.     

Computer-assisted spine surgery

Computer assistance has been shown to improve significantly the accuracy and safety of pedicle screw insertion under clinical conditions. The technique of image-guided navigation is described in this article, based on the authors’ clinical experience of over 4 years. The value of navigation systems for preoperative planning is discussed. Clinical results of the application of this new method in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbosacral spine as well as the iliosacral joints are presented by means of the authors’ own studies and reports from the literature. Pros and cons of computer guidance are discussed. The authors predict computer navigation will be used in percutaneous and minimally invasive procedures in the near future.     

Computer-assisted spine surgery

Computer assistance has been shown to improve significantly the accuracy and safety of pedicle screw insertion under clinical conditions. The technique of image-guided navigation is described in this article, based on the authors' clinical experience of over 4 years. The value of navigation systems for preoperative planning is discussed. Clinical results of the application of this new method in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbosacral spine as well as the iliosacral joints are presented by means of the authors' own studies and reports from the literature. Pros and cons of computer guidance are discussed. The authors predict computer navigation will be used in percutaneous and minimally invasive procedures in the near future.     

Evaluation of a transpedicular drill guide for pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine

Insertion of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine is technically difficult and may lead to major complications. Although many computer-assisted systems have been developed to optimize pedicle screw insertion, these systems are expensive, not user-friendly and involve significant radiation from pre-operative computed tomographic (CT) scan imaging. This study describes and evaluates a transpedicular drill guide (TDG) designed to assist in the proper placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Pilot holes were made manually using the TDG in the thoracic spine (T1-T11) of three human cadavers before inserting 4.5-mm-diameter screws. CT scans followed by visual inspection of the spines were performed to evaluate the position of the screws. Five of 66 screws (7.6%) violated the pedicle wall: two (3.0%) medially and three (4.5%) laterally. The medial and lateral perforations were within 1 mm and 2 mm of the pedicle wall, respectively. The medial perforations were not at risk of causing neurological complications. No screw penetrated the superior or inferior pedicle wall. The TDG is easy to use and can decrease the incidence of misplaced thoracic pedicle screws. The TDG could be used as a complement to fluoroscopy in certain applications, especially for training surgeons.     

Value of intraoperative true lateral radiograph of C2 pedicle for C1-2 transarticular screw insertion.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Transarticular C1-2 screws are widely used in posterior cervical spine instrumentation. Injury to the vertebral artery during insertion of transarticular Cl-2 screw remains a serious complication. Use of a computer-assisted surgery system decreases this complication considerably. However, this system encounters problems in ensuring complete accuracy because of positional variations during preoperative and intraoperative imaging generation. Therefore, intraoperative fluoroscopy still is one of the commonly used methods to guide insertion of transarticular Cl-2 screw. Evaluation of a true lateral radiographic view of the C2 pedicle for screw trajectory during C1-2 transarticular screw insertion may help to minimize this potential complication. PURPOSE: To evaluate the value of intraoperative true lateral radiograph of the C2 pedicle for screw trajectory during C1-2 transarticular screw insertion. STUDY DESIGN: To compare the height of the C2 pedicle area allowing instrumentation on true lateral view radiograph of the C2 pedicle and computed tomographic (CT) scan with multiplanar reconstruction. METHODS: Twenty embalmed human cadaveric cervical spine specimens were used to insert a total of 40 C1-2 transarticular screws using Magerl and Seemann technique. One side of the C2 transverse foramen was filled with radiopaque material (lead oxide) to simulate the artery and to demarcate the danger zone for better visualization on radiography. Measurements and calculation of the mean and standard deviation of the height of the area allowing instrumentation of the C2 pedicle were done on true lateral view radiograph of the C2 pedicle, the sagittal and 30 degrees sagittal views relative to the frontal plane passing exactly through the center of the C2 pedicle of CT scans. Student t test was applied to calculate the statistical significance of measured values. Statistical significance was defined as por=.36. Using sagittal CT scan views, the height of pedicles was 7.71+/-0.7 mm (right) and 7.58+/-1.01 mm (left), p>or=.23. On 30 degrees sagittal CT scan views, the height of pedicles was 7.84+/-1.00 mm (right) and 7.76+/-1.02 mm (left), p>or=.27. The p value was >or=.78, >or=.56, and >or=.49 for true lateral radiographic view and sagittal CT scan view, true lateral radiographic view and 30 degrees sagittal CT scan view, and sagittal CT scan view and 30 degrees sagittal CT scan views, respectively. On lateral view of cervical spine, the decline angle of the transarticular screw was 51.3+/-0.50 degrees (right) and 50.68+/-0.41 degrees (left), p>or=.17. Mean decline angle was 51+/-0.43 degrees . On the anteroposterior (AP) view, radiograph median angle was 6.87+/-0.53 degrees (right) and 6.0+/-0.59 degrees (left), p>or=.25. Mean median angle was 6.44+/-0.62 degrees. CONCLUSIONS: True lateral radiographic views of the pedicles provide useful information for defining screw trajectory intraoperatively. Using this view along with AP and lateral view of cervical spine and preoperative three-dimensional CT scan may narrow the margin of error in this delicate area.     

Spinal navigation in tumor surgery of the thoracic spine: first clinical results

In this clinical study, the accuracy of computed tomography-based and computer-guided decompression and insertion of pedicle screws in patients who have had tumor-related posterior surgery of the thoracic spine was evaluated. Eight patients with advanced metastatic disease were treated surgically using a posterior approach with the assistance of an optoelectronic navigation system. Postoperative computed tomography scans were obtained for all patients and provided information regarding decompression and transpedicle implant localization. In all eight patients accurate decompression of the spinal canal was seen. Using the navigation system, 22 of 26 scheduled transpedicle screws were inserted using computer guidance. Eighty-six percent (19 of 22) of the navigated pedicle screws were positioned centrally in the bone. Initial results indicate that computer-aided frameless navigation in tumor surgery of the thoracic spine is a safe system to improve surgical performance during posterior decompression and transpedicle stabilization. Although computed tomography-based computer-assisted spinal navigation is important, the system is not 100% accurate. Therefore, application of the navigation system should be restricted to experienced surgeons who can continue the operation using a conventional approach. Finally, detailed knowledge of the principles of the tracking systems is necessary to prevent possible misinterpretation of information provided by the computer.     

Pedicle morphology in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: is pedicle fixation an anatomically viable technique?

STUDY DESIGN: A radiographic study of thoracic pedicle anatomy in a group of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the anatomic constraints of the thoracic pedicles and determine whether the local anatomy would routinely allow pedicle screw insertion at every level. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In spite of the clinical successes reported with limited thoracic pedicle screw-rod constructs for thoracic AIS, controversy exists as to the safety of this technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with right thoracic AIS underwent preoperative thoracic CT scans and plain radiographs. Anatomic parameters were measured from T1 to T12. RESULTS: Information on 512 pedicles was obtained. The transverse width of the pedicles from T1 through T12 ranged from 4.6-8.25 mm. The medial pedicle to lateral rib wall transverse width from T1 through T2 ranged from 12.6 to 17.9 mm. Measured dimensions from the CT scans showed the actual pedicle width to be 1-2 mm larger than would have been predicted from the plain radiographs. Age, Risser grade, curve magnitude, and the amount of segmental axial rotation did not correlate with the morphology or size of the thoracic pedicles investigated. In no case would pedicle morphology have precluded the passage of a pedicle screw. CONCLUSION: Based on the data identified in this group of adolescent patients, it is reasonable to consider pedicle screw insertion at most levels and pedicle-rib fixation at all levels of the thoracic spine during the treatment of thoracic AIS.     

导向器结合钉道内壁探查法在下颈椎椎弓根螺钉置入中应用研究

目的:探讨导向器结合钉道内壁探查法置入下颈椎弓根螺钉的技巧并评价其准确性及安全性。方法:2014年1月至2016年10月采用自行设计带角度仪导向器结合钉道内壁探查法对11例患者置入下颈椎椎弓根螺钉,其中男7例,女4例;年龄32~63岁,平均48.1岁;脊髓型颈椎病4例,颈椎骨折脱位4例,无骨折脱位颈脊髓损伤1例,寰枢椎骨折脱位2例。术前CT测量出目标椎弓根直径、理想进钉点及矢状面夹角和横断面内倾角。术中使用自行设计带角度仪导向器严格控制进钉角度,结合探查钉道内壁作为安全置钉标志。术后观察患者有无脊髓及椎动脉损伤表现,复查CT评价椎弓根螺钉位置,并将螺钉准确性进行分级,计算螺钉优良率。结果:11例患者共置入71枚下颈椎弓根螺钉,均未出现手术所导致的脊髓及神经根损伤症状,亦无椎动脉损伤症状。术后CT评估螺钉位置并进行分级:0级52枚,1级13枚,2级4枚,3级2枚。螺钉位置良好率91%。6枚误置螺钉,内壁穿破4枚,2枚穿破外壁。结论:钉道内壁探查法置入下颈椎弓根螺钉安全可靠,但有一定的学习曲线。术中探查出钉道内壁及使用角度仪导向器控制进钉角度是置钉关键。     

Thoracic pedicle screw placement guided by computed tomographic measurements.

Cadaveric pedicle screw placement guided by the measurements from axial computed tomography (CT) scans in the thoracic spine was assessed in this study. Axial CT scans were performed on four cadaveric thoracic spines, and the measurements included the pedicle transverse angle, inner pedicle width, and distance between the midline of the vertebra and the pedicle axis on the dorsal aspect of the lamina. With utilization of the data from CT scans, screws were directly placed into the thoracic pedicle from T1 to T10. Screw penetration of the pedicle was determined by gross examination. The results showed that the largest pedicle transverse angle was found at the levels of T1-2, and the smallest occurred at the T3 through T8 levels. The value of the pedicle inner width was quite different between specimens with a minimum of 3.0 mm at T4 and a maximum of 9.2 mm at T10. Gross examination of the pedicle showed that 13 (16.3%) of 80 screws penetrated the pedicle wall, with a Grade I penetration in 11 pedicles and a Grade II penetration in 2 pedicles. Screw penetration of the medial wall was found in four pedicles and penetration of the lateral wall was noted in nine pedicles. No screw penetration of the superior and inferior walls of the pedicle was identified in any of the four specimens. Thoracic pedicle screw placement guided by the measurements from axial CT scans significantly reduced the incidence of pedicle penetration. Axial CT measurements of the pedicle inner diameter and transverse angle as well as the starting point for screw insertion are recommended if pedicle screw fixation is intended in the thoracic spine.     

Thoracic pedicle screw insertion in scoliosis using posteroanterior C-arm rotation method

OBJECTIVE: Previous researches have emphasized the importance and difficulties in accurate thoracic pedicle screw insertion in scoliosis patients. However, there has been no report on accuracy of the insertion using posteroanterior C-arm fluoroscopy rotated to allow en face visualization of the pedicle in humans. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the thoracic pedicle screw insertion technique using a C-arm fluoroscopy rotation method for the treatment of scoliosis. METHODS: Between October 1997 and September 2005, 33 scoliosis patients who underwent surgical treatment with a total of 410 screws were analyzed. Eleven were male, 22 female and the mean age was 13.4 years. The mean preoperative Cobb angle was 59.7 degrees. Screws were inserted using the C-arm rotation method; screw positions were evaluated with postoperative computed tomography scans. RESULTS: The mean preoperative Cobb angle of 59.7 degrees was corrected to 18.9 degrees (range, 3 to 45 degrees) in the coronal plane (mean correction rate 68%). Postoperative computed tomography scans demonstrated 48 screws penetrated the medial (9 screws) or lateral (39 screws) pedicle cortex with a mean distance of 3.1 and 3.6 mm, respectively. No screws penetrated the inferior or superior cortex in the sagittal plane. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic pedicle screw insertion in scoliosis patients using the posteroanterior C-arm rotation method allows en face visualization of both pedicles by rotating the C-arm to compensate for the rotational deformity, making it a practical, simple and safe method.     

Navigated pedicle screw placement using computed tomographic data in dorsolumbar fractures

Background:

Computed tomographic (CT) based navigation is a technique to improve the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. It is believed to enhance accuracy of pedicle screw placement, potentially avoiding complications arising due to pedicle wall breach. This study aims to assess the results of dorsolumbar fractures operated by this technique.

Materials and Methods:

Thirty consecutive skeletally mature patients of fractures of dorsolumbar spine (T9–L5) were subjected to an optoelectronic navigation system. All patients were thoroughly examined for neurological deficit. The criterion for instability were either a tricolumnar injury or presence of neurological deficit or both. Patients with multilevel fractures and distorted spine were excluded from study. Time taken for insertion of each pedicle screw was recorded and placement assessed with a postoperative CT scan using Laine''s grading system.

Results:

Only one screw out of a total of 118 screws was misplaced with a Laine''s Grade 5 placement, showing a misplacement rate of 0.847%. Average time for matching was 7.8 min (range 5-12 min). Average time taken for insertion of a single screw was 4.19 min (range 2-8 min) and total time for all screws after exposure was 34.23 min (range 24-45 min) for a four screw construct. No neurovascular complications were seen in any of the patients postoperatively and in subsequent followup of 1-year duration.

Conclusion:

CT-based navigation is effective in improving accuracy of pedicle screw placement in traumatic injuries of dorsolumbar spine (T9-L5), however additional cost of procuring CT scan to the patient and cost of equipment is of significant concern in developing countries. Reduced radiation exposure and lowered ergonomic constraints around the operation table are its additional benefits.     

下颈椎前路椎弓根螺钉内固定解剖学测量及临床应用

 目的 通过解剖学测量和临床应用, 探讨下颈椎前路椎弓根螺钉置入的可行性、安全性 及其临床疗效。方法 对 20具成人颈椎标本通过 CT扫描后进行数据测量, 内容包括: 椎体高度、椎体 前后径、椎体宽度、椎弓根横径、椎弓根高度、螺钉长度、横切面角度、矢状面角度、横切面进针点距离、 矢状面进针点距离, 确定进针点, 并进行尸体标本置钉。根据测量数据和术前影像学检查对 5例颈椎骨 折脱位患者行下颈椎前路椎弓根螺钉固定植骨融合术, 术后观察复位及螺钉位置情况及短期随访结 果。结果 横切面角度从 Cxiaobiaokaishi3xiaobiaojieshu(45.7°±4.0°)至 Cxiaobiaokaishi5xiaobiaojieshu(52.1°±5.9°)逐渐增大, 至 Cxiaobiaokaishi6xiaobiaojieshu(47.8°±6.7°)、Cxiaobiaokaishi7xiaobiaojieshu(44.4°±8.3°)又 有所减小。矢状面角度从 Cxiaobiaokaishi3xiaobiaojieshu(93.4°±7.2°)至 Cxiaobiaokaishi6xiaobiaojieshu(112.1°±6.2°)逐渐增大, 至 Cxiaobiaokaishi7xiaobiaojieshu(102.7°±8.5°)又有所减小。横 切面进针点 Cxiaobiaokaishi3xiaobiaojieshu~Cxiaobiaokaishi5xiaobiaojieshu位于椎弓根对侧, Cxiaobiaokaishi6xiaobiaojieshu~Cxiaobiaokaishi7xiaobiaojieshu位于椎弓根同侧;矢状面进针点距离 3.4~7.5 mm。 5例患者术 中减压彻底, 螺钉均位于椎弓根钉道内, 日本骨科协会评分(Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scores, JOA)均有不同程度地提高。结论 下颈椎前路椎弓根螺钉的理想进针点位于距上终板 5 mm左右, 椎 体前正中线附近。横切面角度约为 45.7°~52.1°, 矢状面角度约为 93.4°~112.1°。螺钉长度约为 32 mm。     

Evaluation of registration methods used in frameless stereotactic surgery for the lumbar and cervical regions of the spine

Computer-assisted pedicle screw insertion is feasible but has proved to be problematic. The purpose of this study was to detail the accuracy of registration techniques and pedicle screw insertion using a frameless stereotactic system. Two registration techniques were evaluated on a model spine. The frameless stereotactic system was then used to insert 26 pedicle and 8 lateral mass screws in human cadavers. For posterior vertebral elements, trajectory accuracy was 2.5 +/- 1.0 mm between T12 and L5 and 2.2 +/- 0.9 mm between C2 and T1. Registration of the anterior elements, however, was less accurate. Despite this flaw, all screws were inserted without penetrating the cortex. Screw trajectory was accurate to 2 degrees. The main limitation of frameless stereotactic surgery in the spine stems from the fact that only the posterior vertebral elements are used during registration. Despite this flaw, the system placed all screws correctly. Given these limitations, we believe that this system is most useful for locating the screw insertion point and providing a trajectory in the pedicle.