Comorbidities and mammography use interact to explain racial/ethnic disparities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis

BACKGROUND:

Interactions with comorbidity burden and comorbidity‐related care have not been examined as potential explanations for racial/ethnic disparities in advanced‐stage breast cancer at diagnosis.

METHODS:

The authors used linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results‐Medicare data to determine whether comorbidity burden and comorbidity‐related care are associated with stage at diagnosis, whether these associations are mediated by mammography use, and whether they explain racial/ethnic disparities. Stage at diagnosis and mammography use were analyzed in multivariate regression models, adjusting for comorbidity burden and comorbidity‐race interactions among 118,742 women diagnosed with breast cancer during 1993 to 2005.

RESULTS:

Mammography utilization was higher among women with ≥3 stable comorbidities than among those without comorbidities. Advanced stage at diagnosis was associated with black race (odds ratio [OR], 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6‐1.8), Hispanic ethnicity (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.2‐1.5), unstable comorbidity, and age ≥80 years. Mammography was protective in all racial/ethnic groups, but neither mammography use (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.3‐0.3 and OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.2‐0.2 for women with 1 and ≥2 prior mammograms, respectively) nor overall physician service use (OR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.7‐0.8 for women with ≥16 visits) explained the association between race/ethnicity and stage at diagnosis. The black/white OR fell to 1.2 (95% CI, 0.9‐1.5) among women with multiple stable comorbidities who received ≥2 screening mammograms, and 1.0 (95% CI, 0.8‐1.3) among mammography users with unstable comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS:

Comorbidity burden was associated with regular mammography and earlier stage at diagnosis. Racial/ethnic disparities in late stage disease were reduced among women who received both regular mammograms and comorbidity‐related care. Cancer 2011. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

The association of race/ethnicity, insurance status, and socioeconomic factors with breast cancer care

BACKGROUND:

Few data are available on how race/ethnicity, insurance, and socioeconomic status (SES) interrelate to influence breast cancer treatment. The authors examined care for a national cohort of breast cancer patients to assess whether insurance and SES were associated with racial/ethnic differences in care.

METHODS:

The authors used multivariate logistic regression to assess the probability of definitive locoregional therapy, hormone receptor testing, and adjuvant systemic therapy among 662,117 white, black, and Hispanic women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer during 1998‐2005 at National Cancer Data Base hospitals. In additional models, the authors included insurance and area‐level SES to determine whether these variables were associated with observed racial/ethnic disparities.

RESULTS:

Most women were white (86%), 10% were black, and 4% were Hispanic. Most had private insurance (51%) or Medicare (41%). Among eligible patients, 80.0% (stage I/II) had definitive locoregional therapy, 98.5% (stage I‐IV) had hormone receptor testing, and 53.1% and 50.2% (stage I‐III) received adjuvant hormonal therapy and chemotherapy, respectively. After adjustment, black (vs white) women had less definitive locoregional therapy (odds ratio [OR], 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88‐0.94), hormonal therapy (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.87‐0.93), and chemotherapy (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.84‐0.91). Hispanic (vs white) women were also less likely to receive hormonal therapy. Hormone receptor testing did not differ by race/ethnicity. Racial disparities persisted despite adjusting for insurance and SES.

CONCLUSIONS:

The modest association between black (vs white) race and guideline‐recommended breast cancer care was insensitive to adjustment for insurance and area‐level SES. Further study is required to better understand disparities and to ensure receipt of care. Cancer 2011. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

IL6, aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and breast cancer risk in women living in the southwestern United States.

Interleukin-6 is a cytokine thought to be involved in inflammation, insulin, and estrogen-related pathways. We evaluate genetic variation in the IL6 gene with risk of breast cancer. We also evaluate breast cancer associations with aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. A breast cancer case-control study (n = 1,527 non-Hispanic white cases, 1,601 non-Hispanic white controls, 798 Hispanic/Native American cases, and 924 Hispanic/Native American controls) was conducted among women living in the southwestern United States (4-Corner's Breast Cancer Study). Five IL6 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) and IL6 haplotypes based on these SNPs were evaluated. Allele frequencies were significantly different between non-Hispanic white and Hispanic/Native American women. Among postmenopausal women not recently exposed to hormones, the AG/GG genotypes of rs1800797 (-596A>G) and the GC/CC genotypes of rs1800795 (-174G>C) significantly reduced risk of breast cancer among non-Hispanic white women [odds ratio (OR), 0.69; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.48-1.00 and OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.47-0.99, respectively] and Hispanic/Native American women (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.28-0.83 and OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.26-0.99, respectively). Haplotypes of the five IL6 SNPs further defined these associations. Recent aspirin use significantly decreased risk of breast cancer among postmenopausal Hispanic/Native American women not recently exposed to hormones (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.33-0.96). Among non-Hispanic white, the inverse association with aspirin was not statistically significant. IL6 genotype and haplotype significantly modified the association between aspirin and breast cancer, with the greatest effect modification being among women not recently exposed to hormones [P interaction = 0.06 (for non-Hispanic white) and 0.04 (for Hispanic/Native American) and SNP rs1800796 or -572G>C]. These data suggest that IL6 is associated with breast cancer risk and modifies the association between estrogen and aspirin and breast cancer risk.     

Breast cancer statistics, 2017, racial disparity in mortality by state

In this article, the American Cancer Society provides an overview of female breast cancer statistics in the United States, including data on incidence, mortality, survival, and screening. Approximately 252,710 new cases of invasive breast cancer and 40,610 breast cancer deaths are expected to occur among US women in 2017. From 2005 to 2014, overall breast cancer incidence rates increased among Asian/Pacific Islander (1.7% per year), non‐Hispanic black (NHB) (0.4% per year), and Hispanic (0.3% per year) women but were stable in non‐Hispanic white (NHW) and American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) women. The increasing trends were driven by increases in hormone receptor‐positive breast cancer, which increased among all racial/ethnic groups, whereas rates of hormone receptor‐negative breast cancers decreased. From 1989 to 2015, breast cancer death rates decreased by 39%, which translates to 322,600 averted breast cancer deaths in the United States. During 2006 to 2015, death rates decreased in all racial/ethnic groups, including AI/ANs. However, NHB women continued to have higher breast cancer death rates than NHW women, with rates 39% higher (mortality rate ratio [MRR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35‐1.43) in NHB women in 2015, although the disparity has ceased to widen since 2011. By state, excess death rates in black women ranged from 20% in Nevada (MRR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.01‐1.42) to 66% in Louisiana (MRR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.54, 1.79). Notably, breast cancer death rates were not significantly different in NHB and NHW women in 7 states, perhaps reflecting an elimination of disparities and/or a lack of statistical power. Improving access to care for all populations could eliminate the racial disparity in breast cancer mortality and accelerate the reduction in deaths from this malignancy nationwide. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:439‐448. © 2017 American Cancer Society.     

Racial disparities and survival for nonsmall‐cell lung cancer in a large cohort of black and white elderly patients

BACKGROUND:

This study aimed to examine disparities in survival and associated factors for patients with nonsmall‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to determine whether racial disparities varied over time (1991‐1995, 1996‐1999, and 2000‐2002).

METHODS:

The authors studied 70,901 patients aged ≥65 years with stage I‐IV NSCLC identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results/Medicare data. Multivariate time‐to‐event survival analyses were completed using Cox proportional regression modeling.

RESULTS:

The 5‐year observed lung cancer‐specific survival rates were 52.7% for whites and 47.5% for blacks with stage I‐II disease, and 17.7% and 19.6% for whites and blacks, respectively at stages III‐IV. After controlling for standard treatment, socioeconomic status (SES), and other factors, there were no significant differences in all‐cause mortality, or lung cancer‐specific mortality between black and white patients with stage I‐II or III‐IV lung cancer. However, blacks had an increased risk for overall all‐cause mortality at stage I‐IV (hazard ratio [HR], 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.13‐1.35), and during 2000‐2002 at stage III‐IV for all‐cause mortality (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.02‐1.47) and lung cancer‐specific mortality (HR, 1.24; 95% CI,1.01‐1.53). Standard treatment was significantly associated with increased survival, whereas poor SES was associated with increased mortality.

CONCLUSIONS:

There were no significant differences in survival between blacks and whites with NSCLC within stage stratifications after adjusting for covariates, except for black patients at overall stage for all‐cause mortality and at stage III‐IV diagnosed in 2000‐2002. Receiving stage‐specific evidence‐based standard therapy was associated with significantly increased survival. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.     

Racial disparities and socioeconomic status in association with survival in a large population-based cohort of elderly patients with colon cancer

BACKGROUND: To the authors' knowledge, few studies have addressed racial disparities in the survival of patients with colon cancer by adequately incorporating treatment and socioeconomic factors in addition to patient and tumor characteristics. METHODS: The authors studied a nationwide and population-based, retrospective cohort of 18,492 men and women who were diagnosed with stage II or III colon cancer at age >or=65 years between 1992 and 1999. This cohort was identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registries-Medicare linked databases and included up to 11 years of follow-up. RESULTS: A larger proportion (70%) of African-American patients with colon cancer fell into the poorest quartiles of socioeconomic status compared with Caucasians (21%). Patients who lived in communities with the lowest socioeconomic level had 19% higher all-cause mortality compared with patients who lived in communities with the highest socioeconomic status (hazards ratio [HR], 1.19; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.13-1.26; P < .001 for trend). The risk of dying was reduced only slightly after controlling for race/ethnicity (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.10-1.24). Compared with Caucasian patients with colon cancer, African-American patients were 21% more likely to die after controlling for age, sex, comorbidity scores, tumor stage, and grade (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.12-1.30). After also adjusting for definitive therapy and socioeconomic status, the HR of mortality was only marginally significantly higher in African Americans compared with Caucasians for all-cause mortality (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.02-1.19) and colon cancer-specific mortality (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.33). CONCLUSIONS: Lower socioeconomic status and lack of definitive treatment were associated strongly with decreased survival in both men and women with colon cancer. Racial disparities in survival were explained substantially by differences in socioeconomic status.     

Racial disparities in breast cancer mortality in a multiethnic cohort in the Southeast

BACKGROUND:

Although much has been done to examine those factors associated with higher mortality among African American women, there is a paucity of literature that examines disparities among rural African Americans in South Carolina. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the association of race and mortality among breast cancer patients in a large cohort residing in South Carolina for which treatment regimens are standardized for all patients.

METHODS:

Subjects included 1209 women diagnosed with breast cancer between 2000 and 2002 at a large, local hospital containing a comprehensive breast center. Kaplan‐Meier survival curves were calculated to determine survival rates among African American and European American women, stratified by disease stage or other prognostic characteristics. Adjusting for various characteristics, Cox multivariate survival models were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR).

RESULTS:

The 5‐year overall all‐cause mortality survival proportion was ～78% for African American women and ～89% for European American women, P < 0.01. In analyses of subpopulations of women with identical disease characteristics, African American women had significantly higher mortality than European American women for the same type of breast cancer disease. In multivariate models, African American women had significantly higher mortality than European American women for both breast cancer‐specific death (HR, 2.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21‐4.79) and all‐cause mortality (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.06‐1.89).

CONCLUSIONS:

African American women residing in rural South Carolina had lower survival for breast cancer even after adjustment for disease‐related prognostic characteristics. These findings support health interventions among African American breast cancer patients aimed at tertiary prevention strategies or further down‐staging of disease at diagnosis. Cancer 2011. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Racial disparities in initiation of adjuvant endocrine therapy of early breast cancer

Endocrine therapy (ET) is the cornerstone of adjuvant therapy for hormone-receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer. The survival gap between African-American (AA) and white women with breast cancer is most pronounced in HR+ subtypes, and could be related to differences in ET use. The relationship between race and initiation of ET is not well defined. We investigated patterns of ET initiation by race in a diverse cohort of women covered by commercial health insurance. We identified 2,640 women with incident HR+ breast cancer in the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry whose records linked to commercial insurance claims using the Integrated Cancer Information and Surveillance System (ICISS) database. The sample included women age <65 years diagnosed with stage I–III HR+ cancers between 2004 and 2009. We used multivariate Poisson regression to examine the effect of race on likelihood of initiating ET. 14 % of women did not initiate ET within 12 months of diagnosis. AA women were 17 % less likely to initiate ET than whites (aRR 0.83, 95 % CI 0.74–0.93). When analyzed by subset, racial disparities persisted among women who received chemotherapy (aHR 0.67, 95 % CI 0.56–0.80) but not among women who did not receive chemotherapy (aHR 0.96, 95 % CI 0.76–1.21). AA women in our sample were less likely to initiate ET than whites, and this disparity was concentrated among chemotherapy-treated women. ET under-utilization may contribute to the racial survival gap in HR+ breast cancer, and represents an opportunity for intervention to reduce breast cancer disparities.     

Endometrial carcinoma recurrence according to race and ethnicity: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group 210 Study

Non‐Hispanic black (NHB) women are more likely to experience an endometrial carcinoma (EC) recurrence compared to non‐Hispanic white (NHW) women. The extent to which tumor characteristics, socioeconomic status (SES) and treatment contribute to this observation is not well defined. In the NRG Oncology/Gynecology Oncology Group (GOG) 210 Study we evaluated associations between race/ethnicity and EC recurrence according to tumor characteristics with adjustment for potential confounders. Our analysis included 3,199 NHW, 532 NHB and 232 Hispanic women with EC. Recurrence was documented during follow‐up. We used Cox regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between race/ethnicity and EC recurrence in models stratified by histologic subtype (low‐grade endometrioid, high‐grade endometrioid, serous, mixed cell, carcinosarcoma, clear cell) or stage (I, II, III) and adjusted for age, SES, body mass index, smoking status and treatment. In histologic subtype‐stratified models, higher EC recurrence was noted in NHB women with low‐grade endometrioid (HR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.21–3.10) or carcinosarcomas (HR = 1.66, 95% CI = 0.99–2.79) compared to NHWs. In stage‐stratified models, higher EC recurrence was noted among NHB women with stage I (HR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.06–2.05) and Hispanic women with stage III disease (HR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.11–2.95). Our observations of higher EC recurrence risk among NHB and Hispanic women, as compared to NHW women, were not explained by tumor characteristics, SES, treatment or other confounders. Other factors, such as racial differences in tumor biology or other patient factors, should be explored as contributors to racial disparities in EC recurrence.     

Mortality following development of breast cancer while using oestrogen or oestrogen plus progestin: a computer record-linkage study

The literature on the relationship between breast cancer mortality and postmenopausal oestrogen and combined oestrogen/progestin therapy is seemingly contradictory. This study explored survival after exposure to oestrogen or oestrogen plus progestin at or in the year prior to breast cancer diagnosis. Information on patients first diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 1993 and 1998 was linked with outpatient pharmacy data from 1992 to 2000. Patients were classified according to use of oestrogen alone or oestrogen plus progestin at or in the year prior to diagnosis. Compared to nonusers, and adjusting for age at diagnosis, race/ethnicity, tumour size and grade, oestrogen receptor status, surgery status, and chemotherapy and hormone therapy for breast cancer treatment, oestrogen plus progestin users had lower all-cause mortality (stage I hazard ratio (HR) = 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI)= 0.48-0.99; stage II HR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.39-0.72) and breast cancer mortality (stage I HR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.26-1.04; stage II HR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.48-0.98). Oestrogen users experienced little or no survival benefit for all-cause mortality (stage I HR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.77-1.42; stage II HR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.65-1.14) or breast cancer mortality (stage I HR = 1.23, 95% CI 0.72-2.10; stage II HR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.72-1.41). Our findings suggest, relative to nonusers, a lower risk of death from all causes and from breast cancer in patients who were diagnosed with breast cancer while exposed to oestrogen plus progestin, but not in patients exposed to oestrogen only.     

Racial segregation and disparities in breast cancer care and mortality

BACKGROUND.

Questions have existed as to whether residential segregation is a mediator of racial/ethnic disparities in breast cancer care and breast cancer mortality, or has a differential effect by race/ethnicity.

METHODS.

Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare database on white, black, and Hispanic women aged 66 to 85 years with breast cancer were examined for the receipt of adequate breast cancer care.

RESULTS.

Blacks were less likely than whites to receive adequate breast cancer care (odds ratio [OR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71‐0.86). Individuals, both black and white, who lived in areas with greater black segregation were less likely to receive adequate breast cancer care (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.64‐0.82). Black segregation was a mediator of the black/white disparity in breast cancer care, explaining 8.9% of the difference. After adjustment, adequate care for Hispanics did not significantly differ from whites, but individuals, both Hispanic and white, who lived in areas with greater Hispanic segregation were less likely to receive adequate breast cancer care (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.61‐0.89). Although Blacks experienced greater breast cancer mortality than whites, black segregation did not substantially mediate the black‐white disparity in survival, and was not significantly associated with mortality (hazards ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.87‐1.21). Breast cancer mortality did not differ between Hispanics and whites.

CONCLUSIONS.

Among seniors, segregation mediates some of the black‐white disparity in breast cancer care, but not mortality. Individuals who live in more segregated areas are less likely to receive adequate breast cancer care. Cancer 2008. © 2008 American Cancer Society.     

Does having insurance affect differences in clinical presentation between Hispanic and non‐Hispanic white women with breast cancer?

BACKGROUND: Hispanic women with breast cancer present differently than do non-Hispanic white (NHW) women. Lack of access to care has been offered as an explanation for these differences. In this study breast cancer presentation was examined in Hispanic women in a comprehensive, equal-access health care system. METHODS: Hispanic and NHW breast cancer cases registered between 1995 and 2004 in the Kaiser Permanente of Colorado Tumor Registry were compared by age at diagnosis, stage, tumor grade, size, and receptor status. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to generate age-adjusted odds ratios by ethnicity and each tumor characteristic. RESULTS: A total of 139 Hispanic women and 2118 NHW women with breast cancer were identified. Hispanic women had a mean average age at diagnosis of 56 years compared with 61 years for NHW women (P < .0001). Use of mammographic screening services in the prior 2 years was similar by ethnicity. Relative to NHW women, Hispanic women had age-adjusted odds ratios of 2.70 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26-5.77) for having stage IV disease, 2.25 (95% CI: 1.39-3.67) for having poorly differentiated tumors, 2.16 (95% CI: 1.26-3.69) for having a tumor greater than 5 cm, and 1.88 (95% CI: 1.24-2.81) for having estrogen receptor-negative tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Despite equal access to health care services, differences persist in the size, stage, and grade of breast cancer for Hispanic women compared with NHW women. The results of the study suggest a biologic/genetic basis for these differences.     

Differences in the quality of breast cancer care among vulnerable populations

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether differences in the quality of breast cancer care among women from racial and ethnic minority groups, the elderly, and rural areas have changed over time across the continuum of care. METHODS: The linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database identified 22,701 women ages 66-79 years diagnosed with early stage breast cancer from 1992-1999. Multiple breast cancer processes of care were measured, including breast-conserving surgery, radiation therapy, documentation of estrogen receptor status, surveillance mammography, and a combined measure of "adequate care". RESULTS: African-American and Hispanic women were significantly less likely to receive adequate care than White women in unadjusted comparisons (54.7% and 58.0% vs. 68.4% for African-American and Hispanic vs. White women) and adjusted comparisons (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.67; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.59-0.76, and AOR 0.77; 95% CI 0.66-0.90 for African-American and Hispanic women, respectively). The proportion of Asian/Pacific Islander women receiving adequate care was similar to White women. When considering only women diagnosed with breast cancer from 1997-1999, African-American women remained less likely than White women to receive adequate care (AOR 0.63; 95% CI 0.50-0.79). Women ages 75-79 years were less likely to receive adequate care compared with women ages 66-69 years (AOR 0.74; 95% CI 0.69-0.80), and women from rural (vs. metropolitan) areas were less likely to receive adequate care (AOR 0.81; 95% CI 0.73-0.89). CONCLUSIONS: The quality of breast cancer care is lower among vulnerable populations across the continuum of care, and many of these differences have not improved in more recent years.     

Variation in quality of care among older men with localized prostate cancer

BACKGROUND:

The objective of this study was to assess the racial and ethnic disparities in outcomes and their association with process‐of‐care measures for elderly Medicare recipients with localized prostate cancer.

METHODS:

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results‐Medicare databases for the period from 1995 to 2003 were used to identify African‐American men, non‐Hispanic white men, and Hispanic men with localized prostate cancer, and data were obtained for the 1‐year period before the diagnosis of prostate cancer and up to 8 years postdiagnosis. The short‐term outcomes of interest were complications, emergency room visits, readmissions, and mortality; the long‐term outcomes of interest were prostate cancer‐specific mortality and all‐cause mortality; and process‐of‐care measures of interest were treatment and time to treatment. Cox proportional hazards regression, logistic regression, and Poisson regression were used to study the racial and ethnic disparities in outcomes and their association with process‐of‐care measures.

RESULTS:

Compared with non‐Hispanic white patients, African‐American patients (Hazard ration [HR], 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CE], 1.19‐1.86) and Hispanic patients (HR=1.39; 95% CI, 1.03‐1.84) had greater hazard of long term prostate specific mortality. African‐American patients also had greater odds of emergency room visits (odds ratio, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2‐1.7) and greater all‐cause mortality (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.3‐1.5) compared with white patients. The time to treatment was longer for African‐American patients and was indicative of a greater hazard of all‐cause, long‐term mortality. Hispanic patients who underwent surgery or received radiation had a greater hazard of long‐term prostate‐specific mortality compared with white patients who received hormone therapy.

CONCLUSIONS:

Racial and ethnic disparities in outcomes were associated with process‐of‐care measures (the type and time to treatment). The current results indicated that there is an opportunity to reduce these disparities by addressing these process‐of‐care measures. Cancer 2011. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Racial disparities in the development of breast cancer metastases among older women

BACKGROUND:

Distant metastases are the most common and lethal type of breast cancer relapse. The authors examined whether older African American breast cancer survivors were more likely to develop metastases compared with older white women. They also examined the extent to which 6 pathways explained racial disparities in the development of metastases.

METHODS:

The authors used 1992‐1999 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data with 1991‐1999 Medicare data. They used Medicare's International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes to identify metastases of respiratory and digestive systems, brain, bone, or other unspecified sites. The 6 pathways consisted of patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, type of treatment received, access to medical care, surveillance mammography use, and area‐level characteristics (poverty rate and percentage African American) and were obtained from the SEER or Medicare data.

RESULTS:

Of the 35,937 women, 10.5% developed metastases. In univariate analysis, African American women were 1.61 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.54‐1.83) more likely to develop metastasis than white women. In multivariate analysis, tumor grade, stage at diagnosis, and census‐tract percentage African American explained why African American women were more likely to develop metastases than white women (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.68‐1.03).

CONCLUSIONS:

Interventions to reduce late‐stage breast cancer among African Americans also may reduce racial disparities in subsequent increased risk of developing metastasis. African Americans diagnosed with high‐grade breast cancer could be targeted to reduce their risk of metastasis. Future studies should identify specific reasons why the racial distribution in census tracts was associated with racial disparities in the risk of breast cancer metastases. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.     

Ethnic neutropenia and treatment delay in African American women undergoing chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer

Disparities in breast cancer survival have been observed between African American and white women. There are also known differences in mean baseline white blood cell (WBC) count among racial and ethnic groups. If the WBC count falls below conventionally defined treatment thresholds for patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy, reduced doses or treatment delays may occur, which could lead to race-based differences in treatment duration. We used the tumor registry at Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center to identify 1178 women with newly diagnosed stage I and II breast cancer from whom we collected base-line information for 73 African American women and 126 age- and tumor stage-matched white women. Of these women, 43 African American and 93 white women underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. African American women had statistically significantly lower WBC counts than white women at diagnosis (6.2 x 10(9)/L for African American women versus 7.4 x 10(9)/L for white women, difference = 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.2 to 1.2; P =.02) and after treatment (5.3 x 10(9)/L for African American women versus 6.4 x 10(9)/L for white women, difference = 1.1, 95% CI = 0.2 to 2.5; P =.03). Overall, African American women required a statistically significantly longer duration of treatment than white women (19 weeks versus 15 weeks, respectively, difference = 4 weeks, 95% CI = 0.5 to 7.2 weeks; P =.03). The lower baseline WBC counts and longer duration of treatment for early-stage breast cancer in African American women compared with those in white women result in lower dose intensity of treatment for African American women, possibly contributing to observed racial differences in breast cancer survival.     

Contribution of clinical and socioeconomic factors to differences in breast cancer subtype and mortality between Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women

Purpose

To assess tumor subtype distribution and the relative contribution of clinical and sociodemographic factors on breast cancer survival between Hispanic and non-Hispanic whites (NHWs).

Methods

We analyzed data from the California Cancer Registry, which included 29,626 Hispanic and 99,862 NHW female invasive breast cancer cases diagnosed from 2004 to 2014. Logistic regression was used to assess ethnic differences in tumor subtype, and Cox proportional hazard modeling to assess differences in breast cancer survival.

Results

Hispanics compared to NHWs had higher odds of having triple-negative (OR = 1.29; 95% CI 1.23–1.35) and HER2-overexpressing tumors (OR = 1.19; 95% CI 1.14–1.25 [HR?] and OR = 1.39; 95% CI 1.31–1.48 [HR+]). In adjusted models, Hispanic women had a higher risk of breast cancer mortality than NHW women (mortality rate ratio [MRR] = 1.24; 95% CI 1.19–1.28). Clinical factors accounted for most of the mortality difference (MRR = 1.05; 95% CI 1.01–1.09); however, neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) and health insurance together accounted for all of the mortality difference (MRR = 1.01; 95% CI 0.97–1.05).

Conclusions

Addressing SES disparities, including increasing access to health care, may be critical to overcoming poorer breast cancer outcomes in Hispanics.

     

Survival in stage I–III breast cancer patients by surgical treatment in a publicly funded health care system

BackgroundRecent investigations of breast cancer survival in the United States suggest that patients who receive mastectomy have poorer survival than those who receive breast-conserving surgery (BCS) plus radiotherapy, despite clinically established equivalence. This study investigates breast cancer survival in the publicly funded health care system present in Alberta, Canada.Patients and methodsSurgically treated stage I–III breast cancer cases diagnosed in Alberta from 2002 to 2010 were included. Demographic, treatment and mortality information were collected from the Alberta Cancer Registry. Unadjusted overall and breast cancer-specific mortality was assessed using Kaplan–Meier and cumulative incidence curves, respectively. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate stage-specific mortality hazard estimates associated with surgical treatment received.ResultsA total of 14 939 cases of breast cancer (14 633 patients) were included in this study. The unadjusted 5-year all-cause survival probabilities for patients treated with BCS plus radiotherapy, mastectomy, and BCS alone were 94% (95% CI 93% to 95%), 83% (95% CI 82% to 84%) and 74% (95% CI 70% to 78%), respectively. Stage II and III patients who received mastectomy had a higher all-cause (stage II HR = 1.36, 95% CI 1.13–1.48; stage III HR = 1.74, 95% CI 1.24–2.45) and breast cancer-specific (stage II HR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.09–1.76; stage III HR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.21–2.65) mortality hazard compared with those who received BCS plus radiotherapy, adjusting for patient and clinical characteristics. BCS alone was consistently associated with poor survival.ConclusionsStage II and III breast cancer patients diagnosed in Alberta, Canada, who received mastectomy had a significantly higher all-cause and breast cancer-specific mortality hazard compared with those who received BCS plus radiotherapy. We suggest greater efforts toward educating and encouraging patients to receive BCS plus radiotherapy rather than mastectomy when it is medically feasible and appropriate.     

Unlimited access to care: effect on racial disparity and prognostic factors in lung cancer.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the prognostic factors influencing lung cancer survival under a universal health care system and determine if access to care eliminates clinical outcome disparity.DESIGN: Retrospective case series review.BACKGROUND: Lung cancer survival is worse in men and in African Americans, thought to be related to poor general health in men and limited access to heath care in African Americans. The Military Health Care System, with unlimited access to care, provides an excellent setting for evaluating gender and racial disparities in lung cancer survival.METHODS: Lung cancers diagnosed at Walter Reed Army Medical Center, from 1990 to 2000, were evaluated by chart review for age, gender, race, smoking history, cancer history, histology, stage, and completeness of resection.RESULTS: Seven hundred thirteen Caucasians and 173 African Americans, 2:1 male predominance, had a 22% 5-year survival. Cox model analysis showed that male gender [hazard ratio (HR, 1.31) 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.02-1.68], advanced-stage disease (stage III: HR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.57-4.26/stage IV: HR, 4.20; 95% CI, 2.51-7.41), and incomplete resection (HR, 4.06; 95% CI, 2.75-5.99) were predictors of poor outcome; whereas bronchoalveolar carcinoma features (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.23-0.52) and smoking cessation >7 years (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.49-0.99) were predictors of favorable outcome. No ethnic differences in survival were observed.CONCLUSIONS: No racial disparities in survival when access to medical care is universal. Male gender, incomplete resection, and advanced stage are significant predictors of poor outcome in lung cancer.     

Survival differences by race/ethnicity among children and adolescents diagnosed with germ cell tumors

Survival differences by racial and ethnic group have been reported in children and adolescents with germ cell tumors (GCTs), but whether these differences depend on stage of disease is unclear. Using the SEER 18 registries (2000–2015), we examined GCT survival differences by race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white [NHW], Black, Asian/Pacific Islander [API], Hispanic) separately for males and females aged 0–19 years at diagnosis. We used Kaplan–Meier survival curves (Log-Rank p values) to characterize survival differences. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the association between race/ethnicity and death. Using an inverse odds weighting mediation analysis, we estimated the association between race/ethnicity and death treating stage of disease as the mediator. There were no significant racial/ethnic survival differences among females. Male survival differed by race/ethnicity (p < 0.0001) with NHW males having the best survival. Compared to NHW, API and Hispanic males had significantly higher risks of death (API HR: 2.18; 95% CI: 1.32–3.56; Hispanic HR: 1.98; 95% CI: 1.42–2.78) (model adjusted for age and year at diagnosis, tumor histology and location, stage). This association was mediated by stage of disease only among Hispanic males with gonadal tumors (indirect HR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.03–1.35). The increased risk of death after a testicular GCT diagnosis observed among Hispanic males was mediated by stage of disease. For API males and Hispanic males with extragonadal tumors, other unidentified factors including differences in exposures, tumor biology or treatment received may impact the observed racial/ethnic survival disparities.