Comparison of stationary vs ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring systems in diagnosis og gastroesophageal reflux disease

Twenty-four-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring is presently considered the most reliable diagnostic test for gastroesophageal reflux. Prolonged esophageal pH measurements can be obtained in hospitalized patients with a stationary technique and in ambulant outpatients by means of a portable device; however, there have been no studies that have examined whether the two approaches provide a similar diagnostic accuracy. We performed a prospective study to compare stationary and ambulatory pH-metry in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux. Seventy-seven control subjects and 178 patients with proven gastroesophageal reflux disease were randomized to either ambulant or static pH-metry, which was performed with standard pH electrodes, sensors, and recorders. Reflux events (intraesophageal pH<4.0) analyzed were: number of episodes; total, upright, and supine reflux time; number of episodes lasting >5 min; and duration of the longest episode. A composite score of all reflux events according to DeMeester was also calculated. The limits of normality were defined as the 95th percentiles of the control groups. Both controls and patients assigned to either pH monitoring method were comparable. Of 255 studies attempted, 243 (95%) were completed successfully. The results showed similar median values of reflux events for the two control groups and for the two patients groups. Percent total reflux time provided a good separation between normal and abnormal reflux, with a sensitivity of 0.92 for static pH-metry and 0.68 for the ambulant procedure (respective 95th percentiles, 3.4 and 4.6). The lower sensitivity of ambulatory pH-metry compared to the stationary method could not be attributed to the higher normal limit in the former; circumstantial evidence suggests that dietary restrictions by the patients to minimize symptoms during home monitoring were probably responsible of this relatively high false negative rate. In conclusion, the results confirm the accuracy of stationary pH monitoring in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux and show that the ambulatory procedure is less reliable; its sensitivity could probably be improved by strict dietary standardization.Supported in part by grants 87/1132, 89/631 and 90/505 from FISSS, Spanish Ministry of Health.A preliminary communication of this work was presented at the 3rd International Polydisciplinary Congress of the OESO, Paris, June 1990.     

Results of 24-hour esophageal impedancep H monitoring in 141 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

<正>Objective To analyze the relationship between body type,age,gender,esophageal motility function,lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) and clinical classification and type of reflux contents of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Methods From     

含餐8 h食管pH监测与常规24 h pH监测对胃食管反流病的诊断价值比较

目的探讨含餐8h食管pH监测对胃食管反流病(GERD)的诊断意义,并以常规24hpH监测为标准验证其灵敏度及特异度。方法对2003年3月至2006年9月北京大学人民医院消化科221例患者进行食管测压和pH监测。首先由系统计算24h DeMeester积分,≥14.72分诊断为胃食管反流病。入选患者晚餐开始共计8h的监测数据,同样计算DeMeester积分,相同的标准诊断胃食管反流病。比较两种方法的一致性及积分的相关性。结果221例患者经常规24hpH监测诊断胃食管反流病124例,正常97例,含餐8hpH监测方法诊断胃食管反流病120例,正常101例。含餐8h的灵敏度为93.5%,特异度95.9%,经Kappa及Mc-nemar检验2种方法具有良好的一致性,部分结果的差异不具有显著性。2种检测方式DeMeester积分的相关系数为0.929。结论含餐8小时监测法和24hpH监测法具有良好的一致性,有望用于GERD特别是内镜阴性GERD的诊断。     

Use of pH-impedance testing to evaluate patients with suspected extraesophageal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease

GOALS: To report the use of pH-impedance testing in evaluating patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with atypical symptoms. BACKGROUND: Although the role of acid reflux in causing atypical GERD symptoms is generally accepted, the role, if any, of nonacid reflux is controversial, largely because until recently it has not been possible to detect nonacid reflux. The advent of intraluminal combined pH impedance testing (MII-pH), to detect nonacid reflux has heightened interest in its possible contribution to atypical symptoms. STUDY: Fifty consecutive patients referred for MII-pH testing to evaluate the cause of atypical symptoms presumed due to GERD were evaluated. The symptoms were either refractory to acid inhibition therapy or so atypical that further work up was desired by the referring physician. Patients underwent MII-pH testing to determine whether reflux was present, and, if so, if it was due to acid, nonacid, or gas. RESULTS: Only 16%, 22%, and 2% patients were found to have symptoms due to acid reflux, nonacid reflux, or both, respectively. Ten percent of these patients had gas reflux. MII-pH testing was useful in redirecting the management of patients who did not have reflux as the cause of their symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: MII-pH testing is useful in determining whether gastroesophageal reflux is present in patients with atypical symptoms that have not responded to proton pump inhibitor therapy. It also distinguishes between reflux due to acid, nonacid, and gas, with consequences for management.     

24小时动态心电图对冠心病的诊断价值

对41例胸痛患者进行24小时动态心电图(AECG)及冠状动脉造影检查,其中24例在作上述检查2—3周内进行平板运动试验。10例正常冠状动脉患者AECG显示心肌缺血者仅1例,特异性90％;冠状动脉病变31例中显示心肌缺血20例,敏感性65％。心肌缺血检出敏感性与冠状动脉病变程度有关,多支病变为78％,单支病变为46％(P<0.01).AECG对单支病变患者,心肌缺血检出率明显低于平板运动试验(P<0.01);对多支病变患者,心肌缺血检出率与平板运动试验相同,均为88％。     

The role of esophageal motility in gastroesophageal reflux disease: Technique and clinical results of ambulatory 24-hour Mano/-pH-Metry

The interplay between esophageal motility and gastroesophageal reflux (GER) was investigated with a new ambulatory system of 24-h monitoring of intraesophageal pressures and pH (MP24). The technique allows for simultaneous digital recordings and off-line data analysis. Both computer-aided and visual analyses were used, and algorithms for intercorrelation of mano- and pH-metry were developed. In a group of normal volunteers the physiological response of esophageal motility on GER was defined. In unselected patients suffering from GER disease, the esophageal motility prior to and during GER events was analyzed. In healthy people, most GER episodes occurred spontaneously and were cleared from the distal esophagus by peristaltic contractions. In GER patients, reflux episodes were often preceded by irregular contractions; during GER, esophageal motility was less often peristaltic compared with controls. Therefore, we conclude that MP24 gives relevant information in GER disease which might help in selecting patients for medical or surgical therapy.     

Chronic hoarseness secondary to gastroesophageal reflux disease: documentation with 24-h ambulatory pH monitoring

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) has been implicated in otolaryngologic problems, particularly chronic hoarseness that cannot be attributed to other causes. To study this relationship, we used 24-h ambulatory intraesophageal or dual pharyngoesophageal pH monitoring in 33 patients with chronic hoarseness and laryngeal lesions suggestive of acid irritation. Twenty-six of the patients (78.8%) had pH evidence of severe GER, being at least three times greater than the upper limit of normal. In contrast to 19 patients with proven esophagitis, this GER was worse in the upright position. Of 15 patients with both pharyngeal and esophageal probes, three had esophagopharyngeal reflux, and two had atypical unexplained pharyngeal decreases in pH to below 4.0. Less than half of the 33 patients had the typical symptoms of GER, and standard esophageal tests usually yielded normal findings. Occult GER, predominantly in the upright position, appears to be common and severe in patients with chronic hoarseness, who have laryngeal lesions suggestive of GER. The causative mechanisms are not clear. The 24-h esophageal pH monitor is useful in screening this potentially treatable problem.     

Air swallowing, belching, and reflux in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVES: Belching and gastroesophageal reflux share a common physiological mechanism. The aim of this study was to investigate whether air swallowing leads to both belching and reflux. METHODS: Esophageal impedance, pH, and pressure were measured during two 20-min recording periods in 12 controls and 12 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), before and after intragastric inflation of 600 mL of air. This was repeated after a meal. Subsequently, ambulatory 24-h impedance-pH measurement was performed. RESULTS: During the 24-h study, patients showed a higher incidence of air swallows (287 +/- 45 vs 176 +/- 24, p < 0.05), belches (52.4 +/- 6.6 vs 32.7, p < 0.01), and acid reflux (42.3 +/- 7.6 vs 19.1 +/- 2.8, p < 0.01) than controls. After air infusion the incidence of gas reflux episodes was increased, both in patients (0.58 +/- 0.36 vs 3.50 +/- 0.61, p < 0.01) and in controls (0.75 +/- 0.67 vs 4.08 +/- 0.59, p < 0.01). In contrast, the incidence of acid and weakly acidic reflux episodes was not increased after air infusion, neither in patients (acid: 1.25 +/- 0.37 vs 1.20 +/- 0.33, weakly acidic: 1.08 +/- 0.40 vs 0.80 +/- 0.23) nor in controls (acid: 0.72 +/- 0.34 vs 0.50 +/- 0.23, weakly acidic: 0.80 +/- 0.35 vs 0.33 +/- 0.19). Air infusion increased transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESR) frequency in patients and controls, but this was entirely because of an increase in gas reflux-associated TLESRs. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with GERD swallow air more frequently and belch more frequently than healthy subjects. However, air swallowing is not the cause of their increase in reflux.     

Artificial intelligence automates and augments baseline impedance measurements from pH-impedance studies in gastroesophageal reflux disease

Background

Artificial intelligence (AI) has potential to streamline interpretation of pH-impedance studies. In this exploratory observational cohort study, we determined feasibility of automated AI extraction of baseline impedance (AIBI) and evaluated clinical value of novel AI metrics.

Methods

pH-impedance data from a convenience sample of symptomatic patients studied off (n = 117, 53.1 ± 1.2 years, 66% F) and on (n = 93, 53.8 ± 1.3 years, 74% F) anti-secretory therapy and from asymptomatic volunteers (n = 115, 29.3 ± 0.8 years, 47% F) were uploaded into dedicated prototypical AI software designed to automatically extract AIBI. Acid exposure time (AET) and manually extracted mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) were compared to corresponding total, upright, and recumbent AIBI and upright:recumbent AIBI ratio. AI metrics were compared to AET and MNBI in predicting  ≥ 50% symptom improvement in GERD patients.

Results

Recumbent, but not upright AIBI, correlated with MNBI. Upright:recumbent AIBI ratio was higher when AET  > 6% (median 1.18, IQR 1.0–1.5), compared to  < 4% (0.95, IQR 0.84–1.1), 4–6% (0.89, IQR 0.72–0.98), and controls (0.93, IQR 0.80–1.09, p ≤ 0.04). While MNBI, total AIBI, and the AIBI ratio off PPI were significantly different between those with and without symptom improvement (p < 0.05 for each comparison), only AIBI ratio segregated management responders from other cohorts. On ROC analysis, off therapy AIBI ratio outperformed AET in predicting GERD symptom improvement when AET was  > 6% (AUC 0.766 vs. 0.606) and 4–6% (AUC 0.563 vs. 0.516) and outperformed MNBI overall (AUC 0.661 vs. 0.313).

Conclusions

BI calculation can be automated using AI. Novel AI metrics show potential in predicting GERD treatment outcome.

     

Effects of a slow-release nifedipine on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure and ischemic changes on 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram in patients with severe coronary artery disease

Calcium antagonists have long been used as first-line drugs for hypertension and angina. However, deleterious effects have also been reported in patients treated with calcium antagonists. Thus, we evaluated the effect of a slow-release twice-daily formulation of nifedipine in 10 patients with severe coronary artery disease. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory electrocardiography (AECG) and blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) were performed simultaneously to detect any association between ischemic episodes on the ECG and changes in blood pressure (BP) and heart rate with and without nifedipine. Increased oxygen demand due to an increased systolic BP and heart rate was associated with ischemic episodes without nifedipine, while those with nifedipine were accompanied by a fall in diastolic BP and a rapid increase in heart rate. This slow-release twice-daily formulation of nifedipine may induce myocardial ischemia through a heart-rate increase and a decrease in coronary blood flow due to lower diastolic BP in patients with severe coronary artery disease. A once-daily formulation of nifedipine might be of great value for such patients.     

QT interval in 24-hour ambulatory ECG recordings from 60 healthy adult subjects

QT and RR intervals were measured in 24-hour electrocardiographic (ECG) recordings from 60 healthy subjects randomly selected among participants in the Copenhagen City Heart Study. Five men and five women of each 10-year age group between the ages of 20 and 79 were included. The mean of three consecutive RR and QT intervals was calculated from ECG strips recorded at 1000, 1400, 1800, 2200, 0200, and 0600 hours in each subject. The RR interval varied between 728 ms at 1400 hours and 984 ms at 0600 hours, and the uncorrected QT interval between 358 ms at 1400 hours and 417 ms at 0200 hours. The QT interval corrected for heart rate by Bazett's formula varied between 418 ms at 0600 hours and 428 ms at 1000 hours, and the QT interval corrected by the regression equation of this study varied between 396 ms at 1400 hours and 422 ms at 0200 hours. Multiple regression analysis of uncorrected data yielded a partial regression coefficient for heart rate influence of 0.14. After correction by Bazett's formula, a statistically significant effect of heart rate remained (partial regression coefficient -0.08, t = -9.93, p less than 0.0001). In addition to the influence of heart rate, the analysis revealed a statistically significant effect of hour of day (F = 11.30; DF 5, 286; p less than 0.0001) and gender (F = 6.24; DF 1, 53; p less than 0.05), whereas age in the range of 20-79 years had no significant effect. The QT intervals of this study differed from the values measured in standard ECG recordings but not from those of other Holter studies.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effect of esomeprazole 40 mg vs omeprazole 40 mg on 24-hour intragastric pH in patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Maintenance of intragastric pH > 4 is vital for effective management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Esomeprazole 40 mg, the first proton pump inhibitor developed as an optical isomer, demonstrates improved acid inhibition over omeprazole 20 mg. Our aim was to compare esomeprazole 40 mg with omeprazole 40 mg, once-daily, on intragastric acidity in patients with symptoms of GERD. In this open-label, crossover study, 130 patients with symptoms of GERD received esomeprazole 40 mg or omeprazole 40 mg once-daily for five days. The 24-hr intragastric pH was monitored on days 1 and 5 of each treatment period. The mean percentage of the 24-hr period with intragastric pH > 4 was significantly greater (P < 0.001) with esomeprazole 40 mg than with omeprazole 40 mg on days 1 (48.6% vs 40.6%) and 5 (68.4% vs 62.0%). Interpatient variability was significantly less with esomeprazole than omeprazole. Esomeprazole was well tolerated. In conclusion, esomeprazole 40 mg provides more effective acid control than twice the standard dose of omeprazole.     

体质量指数、食管裂孔疝与胃食管反流的关系

目的:分析胃食管反流病(gastroesophageal reFLux disease,GERD)患者的体质量指数(body mass index,BMI)、食管裂孔疝(hiatal hernia,HH)与胃食管反流(包括症状、食管炎)的关系.方法:收集2008-06/2011-10期间我院就诊的GERD患者590例.反流性疾病问卷(reflux disease questionnaire,RDQ)评价患者的胃食管反流症状,胃镜诊断糜烂性食管炎(erosive esophagitis,EE)、非糜烂性反流病(non-erosive reflux disease,NERD)、HH.根据BMI将患者分为4组:体质量过轻(BMI<18.5kg/m2)、正常体质量(18.5-22.9kg/m2)、超质量(23.0-24.9kg/m2)、肥胖(≥25kg/m2).分析GERD患者的临床特点、HH与BMI的关系、BMI及HH与GERD症状及EE的关系.结果:(1)临床特征:590例患者RDQ积分13.33±5.66,EE占52.2%(308/590),平均BMI为(23.64±3.10)kg/m2,体质量过轻、正常、超质量及肥胖组患者所占的比例分别为3.7%(22/590)、37.0%(218/590)、23.7%(140/590)、35.6%(210/590);(2)BMI与HH:体质量过轻、正常、超质量及肥胖组HH的检出率分别为0、6.0%(13/218)、12.9%(18/140)、16.7%(35/210),差异有统计学意义(P=0.001);(3)BMI、HH与GERD症状:体质量过轻、正常、超质量、肥胖4组的RDQ积分依次为11.95±5.86、13.33±5.50、13.45±5.22、13.40±6.07(F=0.465,P=0.707);HH组RDQ积分平均值高于无HH组(17.36±6.66vs12.83±5.31,P=0.005),且多元线性回归分析后差异仍有统计学意义(P=0.000);(4)BMI、HH与EE:EE组超质量、肥胖患者的比例明显高于NERD组(P=0.000);HH组EE的检出率高于无HH组(P=0.000).多因素分析后发现BMI、HH是EE发生危险因素.结论:HH可能是肥胖患者发生EE的重要机制之一.GERD患者的症状严重程度与HH相关,而与BMI无关,BMI和HH均是EE发生的危险因素.     

Laryngopharyngeal reflux in patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) has been extensively studied in patients with laryngeal signs and symptoms, gastroesophageal reflux being identified in approximately 50%. Few studies have investigated the incidence and significance of LPR in GERD patients. Two-hundred and seventy-six consecutive patients referred with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux had dual probe 24 h pH, esophageal manometry, GERD and ENT questionnaires. LPR was defined as at least three pharyngeal reflux events less than pH 5.0 with corresponding esophageal reflux, but excluding meal periods. Fourty-two percent of patients were positive for LPR on 24 h pH monitoring and 91.3% corresponded with an abnormal esophageal acid score. Distal esophageal acid exposure was significantly greater (P < 0.001) in patients with LPR but symptoms of GERD and regurgitation scores showed no significant differences between patients with positive and negative LPR on 24 h pH. There was no significant difference between the incidence of LPR in patients with or without laryngeal symptoms. There is a high incidence of LPR in patients with GERD but its significance for laryngeal symptoms is tenuous. Fixed distance dual probe pH monitoring allows documentation of conventional esophageal reflux and LPR.     

Reliability of 24-hour home esophageal ph monitoring in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux

Twenty-four-hour home esophageal pH monitoring is proposed in order to study gastroesophageal reflux (GER) so that prolonged use of costly hospital equipment and staff can be curtailed and the diagnostic accuracy of the examination improved. Eighty-six patients affected by GER symptoms and 20 healthy volunteers underwent 24-hr home esophageal pH monitoring, x-rays, and endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract to investigate reliability of outpatient recording. Fifteen more patients consecutively underwent out- and inpatient recording to detect possible differences between these methods in the two daily periods. Outpatient monitoring was well tolerated in 94.7% of the patients; 14.3% of them markedly reduced their routine activities. The range of normality of outpatient recording does not differ from that of inpatients. In the 15 patients who consecutively underwent out-and inpatient monitoring, no significant differences were reported. The sensitivity of 24-hr home esophageal pH recording is 0.85, the specificity 1, the accuracy for negative prediction 0.68, and the accuracy for positive prediction 1. The reliability of 24-hr home esophageal pH monitoring is comparable to inpatient recording. It allows hospital cost reduction and is also better tolerated by patients but has not greatly improved the diagnostic accuracy of the gastroesophageal reflux pH monitoring.Supported by the Ministere Pubblica Istruzione, Rome; and Finanziamenti per studi e ricerche 40%, Com. 06, Cat 12-07 imp. 11515, University of Bologna.     

Utility of inpatient 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux

The aims of the present study were to evaluate the accuracy of 24-hr intraesophageal pH monitoring in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux in the hospital setting and to establish whether there were any differences in terms of reflux events between patients with and without endoscopic esophagitis. Fifteen control subjects and 47 patients with proven gastroesophageal reflux disease were studied. A composite score of reflux events (number of reflux episodes; total, upright, and supine reflux time; number of refluxes lasting more than 5 min; and duration of the longest reflux) provided the best discrimination between controls and patients (94% sensitivity and 100% specificity). Patients with esophagitis showed concurrently a longer total reflux time and supine reflux time, and more prolonged reflux episodes than those without esophagitis. On the other hand the severity of esophagitis was directly related to the duration of both total and supine reflux. The results indicate that inpatient 24-hr pH-metry is very accurate in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux. They also suggest that prolonged esophageal exposure to acid, particularly at night, and slow esophageal acid clearing are factors that determine the appearance and/or perpetuation of esophagitis in patients with reflux.