Outcome after hypogastric artery bypass and embolization during endovascular aneurysm repair

BACKGROUND: Multiple strategies have been devised to extend the applicability of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in patients with common iliac artery (CIA) aneurysms. This study was designed to examine outcome in patients undergoing EVAR with either hypogastric artery embolization or common iliac artery bifurcation advancement by hypogastric bypass. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing EVAR since the inception of our program (1997-2006) was performed. Data were prospectively collected in an EVAR registry. Patients with large common iliac artery aneurysms (> or = 20 mm) and patent hypogastric arteries not amenable to a cuff or "bell bottom" technique were treated with coil embolization (EMBO) and/or hypogastric revascularization (BYPASS). The perioperative and mid-term outcomes were compared with the larger group of patients undergoing EVAR that did not require either treatment (CTRL). Bilateral common iliac artery aneurysms were treated with unilateral coil embolization and contralateral bypass. RESULTS: Common iliac artery aneurysms were present in 137 (31%) of the 444 patients undergoing EVAR, but only 57 (42%) of 137 required direct management. This included hypogastric artery embolization alone (EMBO) in 31 or hypogastric artery revascularization (BYPASS) in 26, with and without contralateral embolization (both revascularization/embolization in 46%). The procedure length (CTRL, 159 +/- 72 minutes; EMBO, 153 +/- 39 minutes; BYPASS, 283 +/- 75 minutes) and estimated blood loss (CTRL, 251 +/- 313 mL; EMBO, 233 +/- 158 mL; BYPASS, 400 +/- 287 mL) were significantly greater (P < .05) in the BYPASS group. The incidence of any postoperative complication (CTRL, 26%; EMBO, 68%; BYPASS, 54%), any ischemic complication (CTRL, 6%; EMBO, 55%; BYPASS, 27%), and new-onset buttock claudication (CTRL, 3%; EMBO, 39%; BYPASS, 27%) were all significantly greater in the BYPASS and EMBO group relative to the control (CTRL) group (n = 387). The incidence of new-onset buttock claudication ipsilateral to the hypogastric bypass was 4%; the balance of the new onset claudication in the BYPASS group was due to the contralateral embolization. The primary hypogastric artery bypass patency was 91 +/- 11% (SE) at 36 months by life-table analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its increased complexity, hypogastric artery bypass is an excellent alternative to embolization in terms of patency and freedom from ischemic symptoms for patients with large common iliac artery aneurysms undergoing EVAR.     

Effects of bilateral hypogastric artery interruption during endovascular and open aortoiliac aneurysm repair

PURPOSE: Hypogastric artery interruption is sometimes required during aortoiliac aneurysm repair. We have not experienced some of the life-threatening complications of pelvic ischemia reported by others. Therefore we analyzed our experience to identify factors that help minimize pelvic ischemia with unilateral and bilateral hypogastric artery interruption. METHODS: From 1995 to 2003, 48 patients with aortoiliac aneurysm required interruption of both hypogastric arteries as part of endovascular (n = 32) or open surgical (n = 16) repair. During endovascular aneurysm repair coils were placed at the origin of the hypogastric arteries, and bilateral hypogastric artery interruptions were staged at 1 to 2 weeks when possible. Open surgery necessitated oversewing or excluding the origins of the hypogastric arteries and extending the prosthetic graft to the external iliac or femoral artery. Collateral branches from the external iliac and femoral arteries were preserved, and patients received systemic heparinization (50 units/kg). RESULTS: There was no buttock necrosis, ischemic colitis requiring colon resection, or death with the bilateral hypogastric artery interruption. Initially buttock claudication developed in 20 patients (42%), but persisted in only 7 patients (15%) at 1 year. New onset of impotence occurred in 4 of 28 patients (14%), and there were no neurologic deficits. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral hypogastric artery interruptions can be accomplished with limited morbidity. When hypogastric artery interruption is needed during endovascular aneurysm repair, certain principles help minimize pelvic ischemia. These include hypogastric artery interruption at its origin to preserve the pelvic collateral vessels, staging bilateral hypogastric artery interruptions when possible, preserving collateral branches from the femoral and external iliac arteries, and providing adequate heparinization of the patient during these procedures.     

Sloughing of the scrotal skin and impotence subsequent to bilateral hypogastric artery embolization for endovascular aortoiliac aneurysm repair.

Sloughing of the scrotal skin is an extremely rare event due to pelvic ischemia. We report herein one case of scrotal skin sloughing and impotence after bilateral hypogastric artery embolization for endoluminal aortoiliac aneurysm repair. Postoperative penile plethysmography demonstrated a 75% reduction in the penile brachial index, suggesting that pelvic ischemia is the main culprit for this complication. The devastating morbidity in our patient underscores the importance of maintaining pelvic collateral circulation when planning for endovascular aortoiliac aneurysm repair.     

A technique for combined hypogastric artery bypass and endovascular repair of complex aortoiliac aneurysms

Endovascular repair of complex aortoiliac aneurysms may necessitate distal fixation of the endograft to the external iliac artery and percutaneous embolization of the hypogastric artery for prevention of a retrograde endoleak. However, acute interruption of hypogastric perfusion can result in symptoms of pelvic ischemia. We describe a technique in which a prosthetic graft is used as an external iliac artery conduit to facilitate the passage of the endograft delivery catheter/sheath and after completion of the endovascular portion of the procedure, a surgical bypass is completed with anastomosis of the graft to the hypogastric artery.     

Outcome after unilateral hypogastric artery occlusion during endovascular aneurysm repair

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term functional outcome after unilateral hypogastric artery occlusion during endovascular stent graft repair of aortoiliac aneurysms. METHODS: During a 41-month period, 157 consecutive patients underwent elective endovascular stent graft repair of aortoiliac aneurysms with the Medtronic AneuRx device. Postoperative computed tomography scans were compared with preoperative scans to identify new hypogastric artery occlusions. Twenty-three (15%) patients had unilateral hypogastric occlusion, and there were no cases of bilateral occlusions. Telephone interviews about past and current levels of activity and symptoms were conducted, and pertinent medical records were reviewed. All 23 (100%) patients were available for the telephone interview. A disability score (DS) was quantitatively graded on a discrete scale ranging from 0 to 10 corresponding to "virtually bed-bound" to "greater-than-a-mile" exercise tolerance. Worsening or improvement of symptoms was expressed as a difference in DS between two time points (-, worsening/+, improving). RESULTS: Among the 23 patients, two groups were identified: 10 patients (43%) had planned and 13 patients (57%) had unplanned or inadvertent occlusions. The patients in the two groups did not differ significantly in the mean age (73.4 vs 73.7 years), sex (male:female, 9:1 vs 10:3), and duration of follow-up (15.6 vs 14.4 months). Nine (39%) of the 23 patients, five patients in the planned and four patients in the unplanned group, reported significant symptoms of hip and buttock claudication ipsilateral to their occluded hypogastric arteries. The mean decrement from baseline of these nine patients in their DS postoperatively was -3.3. The symptoms were universally noted on postoperative day 1. Although most patients improved (89%), one (11%) never got better. Among those whose symptoms improved, the mean time to improvement was 15 weeks, but with a plateau thereafter resulting in a net decrement of DS of -2.3 from baseline. Finally, when questioned whether they would undergo the procedure again, all 23 patients unanimously answered, "Yes." CONCLUSIONS: A significant number (39%) of patients who sustain hypogastric artery occlusion after endovascular aneurysm repair have symptoms. Although most patients with symptoms have some improvement, none return to their baseline level of activity. Despite this, all patients in retrospect would again choose endovascular repair over conventional open repair.     

Hypogastric artery embolization in endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

PURPOSE: Iliac artery anatomy is a central factor in endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm therapy. It serves as the conduit for graft deployment and as the region of distal graft seal. Thirty-eight percent of iliac vessels in our patients require special treatment because of aneurysms, tortuosity, or small size. Bilateral hypogastric artery exclusion has been avoided because of concerns of colorectal ischemia, hip/buttock claudication, and impotence. We suggest that elective, staged, bilateral hypogastric embolization can be performed safely with reasonably low morbidity and can expand the anatomic boundaries for stent-graft abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. METHODS: This study was performed as a retrospective chart review of patients requiring hypogastric artery embolization for endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms between June 1998 and June 2000. Patients with otherwise appropriate anatomy and common iliac artery aneurysms were informed of the option for stent-graft repair with internal iliac artery embolization with its risks of impotence, hip/buttock claudication, and bowel ischemia. Patients underwent unilateral or staged bilateral coil embolizations of their proximal hypogastric arteries with an approximate 1-week interval between procedures. Hospital and office records were reviewed; phone interviews were performed. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 12 months. RESULTS: During a 24-month period, 65 patients underwent endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair; 18 patients (28%) required hypogastric artery embolization. Seven (39%) of these patients underwent bilateral embolization. There were no episodes of clinically evident bowel ischemia. Lactate levels were normal in all measured patients. Postoperative fevers (> 101.0 degrees F) were documented in 10 (56%) of 18 patients. The average white blood cell count was 12.8 x 10(9)/L (range, 8.5-22.9). There were no positive blood culture results. The return to the full preoperative diet occurred in 1 to 3 days. Hip/buttock claudication occurred in approximately 50% of patients with persistent but improved symptoms at 6 months. Eighty-seven percent of patients had preoperative erectile dysfunction. Only two patients noted worsening of erectile function postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results indicate that bilateral hypogastric artery embolization can be performed, when necessary, with reasonable morbidity in patients undergoing stent-graft abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.     

Clinical implications of internal iliac artery embolization in endovascular repair of aortoiliac aneurysms

To overcome constraints imposed by iliac artery anatomy, the anatomic inclusion criteria for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair can be extended by means of intentional coil occlusion of one or both internal iliac arteries and extension of the distal limb of the graft into an external iliac artery. We reviewed our experience with this intervention to determine the safety and efficacy of this approach to aneurysm repair. Over a 30-month period, 84 patients underwent endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair; 23 underwent intentional unilateral (22) or bilateral (1) internal iliac artery occlusion. Morbidity, mortality, and long-term clinical outcomes were evaluated in these 23 patients. Patients were specifically questioned about exercise-induced buttock and extremity symptoms. Our results showed that intentional internal iliac artery embolization to allow endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms is accompanied by significant morbidity and should be approached with caution.     

腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术中髂内动脉的疏与堵

腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术(EVAR)中髂内动脉的疏与堵的问题,是长期伴随EVAR发展过程的焦点问题。笔者复习了数十篇国外文献,总结和分析了从百年前至今对髂内动脉的系统的解剖学研究、非血管外科手术过程中髂内动脉结扎或栓塞、腹主动脉与髂动脉开放手术中对髂内动脉实施结扎或栓塞、EVAR术中各种栓塞髂内动脉方式的临床后果、导致盆腔缺血各种并发症的危险因素,最终认为,EVAR术中,维持髂内动脉通畅是必要的,并对没有维持通畅的条件而必须栓塞髂内动脉,操作时如何防止或减少盆腔脏器缺血、具体实施技巧、术中术后注意事项等进行了归纳。     

Hypogastric artery preservation during aortoiliac aneurysm repair

Hypogastric artery (HA) embolization with iliac limb extension is often performed for patients with concomitant aorta and common iliac artery aneurysms at the time of standard endovascular aneurysm repair. However, symptomatic pelvic ischemia following HA exclusion can be debilitating. In this study, we described two cases of HA preservation using commercially available stent grafts. The techniques that we described enable patients with concurrent aorta and iliac aneurysms to undergo endovascular aneurysm repair without increasing the risk of pelvic ischemia. Although the long-term durability of these trifurcated graft configurations remains to be determined, the short-term results are superb. Technical considerations of these two different approaches have also been compared.     

Concomitant unilateral internal iliac artery embolization and endovascular infrarenal aortic aneurysm repair

INTRODUCTION: Endograft limb extension to the external iliac artery with embolization of an internal iliac artery (IIA) may be necessary in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) extending to the common iliac artery to prevent endoleak during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). Coil embolization of the IIA can be performed at the same operative setting as EVAR or, alternatively, as a staged procedure. Most interventionalists favor the latter approach to avoid excessive contrast material and prolonged operative time. We investigated the clinical outcome of concomitant vs staged unilateral IIA embolization in the setting of EVAR. METHODS: Vascular surgeons at our institution treated 24 patients with infrarenal EVAR and unilateral coil embolization of the IIA from October 1, 2000 to June 30, 2005. All patients had normal renal function. The details of the operative procedure and perioperative complications were compared in patients undergoing concomitant vs staged procedures. Follow up was 1 to 40 months (average, 11 months). RESULTS: Among the 24, 16 underwent concomitant unilateral IIA embolization in the setting of EVAR and eight patients underwent the staged procedure. Average duration of operative time (298 vs 284 minutes), amount of intravenous contrast (215 mL vs 164 mL), and preoperative (1.12 vs 1.26 mg/dL), and postoperative (1.15 v. 1.31 mg/dl) creatinine levels were similar in the concomitant vs staged group, respectively (P > .05 for all factors). More sensitive markers of renal insufficiency such as creatinine clearance were not measured. In the concomitant group, 25% (4/16) of patients reported significant symptoms of buttock claudication ipsilateral to the embolized IIA, which resolved after a mean of 8.8 months (range, 1 to 15 months) vs no cases (0/8) in the staged group (P = .02048). One patient in the staged group developed ischemic colitis, which was treated conservatively. Coil embolizations that were performed as staged procedures were all done on an outpatient basis. All 24 patients were admitted the day of the EVAR and were discharged the next day, except one patient in the concomitant group was discharged the second day after the procedure, and one patient in the staged group was discharged 7 days after the procedure. CONCLUSION: Despite concern of prolonged operative time and the amount of contrast needed to perform concomitant IIA embolization and EVAR, our results showed that in patients with normal renal function, concomitant unilateral IIA embolization in the setting of EVAR was safe and effective and associated with shorter hospitalization compared with staged procedures. The disadvantage of a concomitant procedure is an increased likelihood of transient buttock claudication, but the small number of patients in this series prohibits definite conclusions about this complication. The concomitant procedure may be preferable for infirm patients with normal renal function who would be greatly inconvenienced by two procedures.     

Use of an aortic bifurcation-sparing endograft facilitates hypogastric preservation during aortoiliac aneurysm repair

A significant percent of patients undergoing endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) have concomitant common iliac artery aneurysms. While most of these patients will tolerate sacrifice of the hypogastric artery during repair, a subset will develop sequelae of hypogastric occlusion. EVAR was performed in two patients using a bifurcation-sparing unibody endograft (Powerlink, Endologix, Irvine, CA, USA). To avoid simultaneous bilateral hypogastric occlusion, one side was treated with coil embolization while the other was treated with a hypogastric graft (Viabahn, W L Gore and Associates, Flagstaff, AZ, USA). Access to the preserved hypogastric artery was obtained from a sheath inserted from the contralateral femoral artery and brought over the aortic bifurcation with the assistance of a 'rail-wire' traversing from the contralateral to ipsilateral femoral sheaths. The hypogastric limb was deployed simultaneously with the ipsilateral external iliac limb extension, creating a double-barrel flow lumen preserving both hypogastric and external iliac flow. At a mean follow-up of 5.1 months, both hypogastric limbs are patent and no endoleaks were observed. In conclusion, until commercially-produced branched hypogastric endografts are widely available, techniques such as those described above can allow for hypogastric preservation during aortoiliac aneurysm repair without the need for device modification or brachial access for hypogastric limb delivery.     

Combined surgical and endovascular repair of a ruptured bilateral aortoiliac aneurysm

Aortoiliac aneurysms are frequent entities that have very important clinical implications, especially in the younger patients. We are asked not only to save lives by preventing the rupture or repairing those that are already ruptured but also to provide an acceptable quality of life in the postoperative period. Endovascular approaches certainly give us such an expectative but are not clearly indicated in our younger patients and cannot be used routinely in those aneurysms with a yuxtarrenal origin. This is the case report of a young man with a yuxtarrenal aortoiliac inflammatory aneurysm that was treated by the interposition of an aortobifemoral bypass with the addition of endovascular devices in the hypogastric vessels to preserve the pelvic blood flow; they contribute to seal the common iliac aneurysms. This approach was useful to avoid complications during a difficult iliac dissection and was permeable within 1 year of the operation. Durability must be assessed.     

主-髂动脉支架感染保守治疗的临床分析

目的探讨保守治疗主-髂动脉腔内修复术后血管内支架感染(EGI)的安全性及临床疗效。方法回顾性分析5例主-髂动脉瘤或主-髂动脉假性动脉瘤腔内修复术后发生EGI的患者资料。对5例EGI患者均行保守治疗,给予21~42天敏感抗生素静脉滴注,出院后继续口服抗生素60天。并对患者进行随访。结果 5例患者经保守治疗后发热及腹痛症状均明显好转,未发生EGI相关并发症,住院时间32~66天,中位住院时间42天。出院前1周内复查血白细胞计数、血液细菌培养及CTA均未见异常。出院后随访16~78个月,中位随访时间50个月,随访期间均无EGI复发,血常规、血液细菌培养均无阳性发现,CTA检查未见EGI相关征象。结论对不适合外科手术的主-髂动脉EGI患者,保守治疗也可获得较为满意的疗效。     

Kissing iliac artery stent technique for salvage of hypogastric artery occlusion secondary to iliac artery dissection during endovascular aneurysm repair

While undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), dissection occurred in bilateral common and external iliac arteries resulting in acute bilateral hypogastric artery occlusion. Attempts were made to reestablish flow to the left internal iliac artery via retrograde ipsilateral approach without success. A left brachial approach was used to gain access to the left internal iliac artery and kissing angioplasty and subsequent stent placement with 2 self-expanding stents was performed raising the iliac bifurcation to the level of the stent graft to salvage the internal iliac artery.     

Clinical outcomes after internal iliac artery embolization prior to endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

Purpose

The success of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is highly dependent on the anatomical features of the aneurysm. In order to prevent type II endoleaks from the internal iliac artery (IIA), embolization of one or both IIAs may be required.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study of a prospectively gathered database of 100 patients who underwent EVAR at our institution. The case notes were examined, and patients were interviewed by telephone and specifically asked about symptoms of pelvic ischemia that they had experienced since undergoing EVAR.

Results

We identified 42 (42 %) patients who had undergone coil embolization of one or both IIAs in preparation for EVAR. The mean time from surgery to the follow-up telephone interview was 21.5 months. Buttock claudication occurred in 10 (26 %) of 38 patients. Sexual dysfunction occurred in 13 of 36 male patients (36 %). Age was associated with buttock claudication and sexual dysfunction.

Conclusion

Based on our experience, IIA embolization prior to EVAR is not a benign procedure. It can lead to numerous effects associated with pelvic ischemia, such as buttock claudication and sexual dysfunction. It is necessary to preserve both internal iliac arteries if possible, especially in young patients.     

The trifurcated endograft technique for hypogastric preservation during endovascular aneurysm repair

Bilateral common iliac artery involvement remains a significant challenge for endovascular aneurysm repair. We describe a technique to overcome this obstacle that we have termed the trifurcated endograft. The technique involves the deployment of a second bifurcated endoprosthesis into an iliac limb to create a three-limbed graft. The third limb is then used as the origin for an extension into one hypogastric artery.