Costs in the treatment of parkinsonism

Parkinson's disease imposes a considerable economic burden on our society. Apart from the direct costs for therapy, the indirect costs of the disease are estimated to be substantially higher. Unfortunately, only the high costs of current medication are usually considered, when financial aspects are discussed. An ideal therapy should ameliorate the symptoms of the disease and achieve a high quality of life. but the prognosis should also be improved. Cost estimates have to be extended throughout the course of the disease. We recommend a treatment schedule which is expected to result in a favorable cost profile when the entire course of the disease, is considered. L-Dopa monotherapy in working patients is obsolete. During the course of the disease dopamine agonists, amantadine, budipine, COMT inhibitors and selegiline will be used.     

Workshop IV: drug treatment guidelines for the long-term management of Parkinson's disease

An attempt was made to establish a decision algorithm for the treatment of idiopathic Parkinson's disease at various stages and in different subgroups such as akinetic-rigid or tremor dominance type. We suggest treating young patients with selegiline and a dopamine agonist. In the tremor dominance type we use either budipine or a dopamine agonist. Due to levodopa-induced dyskinesia, we try to avoid levodopa in the early stages of the disease and use it only later in more advanced situations in a combination therapy with dopamine agonists. Since IPS is not only based upon dopamine deficiency but also on resulting glutamatergic overstimulation, we advocate the use of a glutamate antagonist such as amantadine or budipine. Catechol-O-methyl inhibitors are very helpful when wearing-off occurs. Anticholinergics are only used in the early stages of tremor-dominant IPS because we fear enhancing the risk of dementia.     

Traitement médicamenteux de la maladie de Parkinson à la phase précoce (de novo et « lune de miel »)

In this article, we discuss the management of motor symptoms during the early phases of Parkinson's disease, excluding that of any other clinical manifestation. We relied primarily upon recently published data and do not describe older publications relating to anticholinergic drugs or amantadine. The initial pharmacological treatment of idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD) is symptomatic and remains based upon dopaminergic drugs. However, the development of new drugs has broadened the range of strategic options and improved overall patient management. Announcing the diagnosis is a critical moment, as pointed out by patients’ associations. Patients should be advised to maintain personal, professional, social and physical activities as long as possible. The potential benefit of early pharmacological treatment should be explained, focusing on the possible disease-modifying effect of drugs such as rasagiline. According to current guidelines, L-Dopa is preferred in patients above 65 years of age, while those below 65 should be treated with dopamine agonists. Like monoamine oxidase inhibitors B (MAOI-B), synthetic dopamine agonists exhibit several advantages: easy-to-use treatment with a once-daily administration, delayed L-Dopa initiation, significant efficacy on motor symptoms (although lower than that of L-Dopa). MOAI can be prescribed in association with L-Dopa or dopamine agonists. Rasagiline also delays L-Dopa initiation, and consequently motor complications.     

Adverse drug reactions to selegiline: a review of the French pharmacovigilance database

The present pharmacoepidemiologic study was performed to characterize the profile of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported with selegiline, a monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitor used in the treatment of Parkinson's disease and previously reported to induce an excess of mortality. The analysis was performed with use of the French Pharmacovigilance Database between 1989 and 1997.This database includes all ADRs reported by French practitioners (and especially "serious" and "unexpected" ADRs). Three different analyses were performed: identification of ADRs reported with selegiline, comparison with the ADR profile observed with other antiparkinsonian drugs, and a case/non-case study investigating the occurrence of cardiovascular ADRs with selegiline in comparison with other drugs in general and other antiparkinsonian drugs (e.g., levodopa [L-Dopa], dopamine agonists) in particular. The most often reported ADRs with selegiline were psychiatric (delirium, hallucinations, agitations), cardiovascular (orthostatic hypotension, arterial hypertension, etc.) and neurologic (sedation, abnormal movements, etc.). Psychiatric and cardiovascular ADRs were more frequently reported with selegiline than with L-Dopa or dopamine agonists. The case/ non-case study found an increased risk of cardiovascular ADRs (OR = 1.72; 95% Cl = 1.16-2.55)when selegiline was associated with L-Dopa. These data show that the profile of selegiline-induced ADRs differs from that of other antiparkinsonian drugs (L-Dopa, dopamine agonists) with more psychiatric and cardiovascular ADRs. We suggest that the higher frequency of cardiovascular ADRs could explain, at least partially, the previously reported increase in mortality rate.     

Continuous transdermal dopaminergic stimulation in advanced Parkinson's disease

The objective of the study was to determine the safety and efficacy of increasing doses of Rotigotine CDS in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease. The development of motor complications in Parkinson's disease has been linked to intermittent stimulation of dopamine receptors. Continuous, noninvasive, dopaminergic stimulation has not been available to date. Rotigotine CDS is a lipid-soluble D2 dopamine agonist in a transdermal delivery system that could fill this void. This inpatient study consisted of a 2-week dose escalation phase followed by a 2-week dose maintenance phase at the highest dose (80 cm2). Each individual's L-Dopa dose was back-titrated as feasible. The primary outcome measure was L-Dopa dose, and secondary outcome measures included early morning "off"-L-Dopa Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor scores by a blinded evaluator and motor fluctuation data obtained from patient diaries ("on" without dyskinesia, "on" with dyskinesia, and "off"). Seven of 10 subjects provided data that could be evaluated. There were two administrative dropouts, and one individual was eliminated from the study because of recrudescence of hallucinations. The median daily L-Dopa dose decreased from 1,400 to 400 mg (p = 0.018, Wilcoxon test). Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor scores were unchanged. Although diary variables improved in most individuals, only the reduction in "off" time attained statistical significance. Adverse effects were mild and consisted mainly of dopaminergic side effects and local skin reactions. The data suggest that Rotigotine CDS is an effective treatment for advanced Parkinson's disease and permits patients to substantially lower L-Dopa doses without loss of antiparkinsonian efficacy. Full-scale controlled clinical trials are warranted. In addition to potential therapeutic benefits, this drug can be used to test the hypothesis that continuous dopaminergic stimulation from the initiation of Parkinson's disease therapy will limit the development of motor complications.     

Neuroprotection and pharmacotherapy for motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease leads to major disability that impairs the quality of life of patients and leads to increased health-care costs. While there is no proven neuroprotective treatment, more basic-science research and clinical trials are needed to identify drugs that slow or halt the progression of the disorder. The mainstay of symptomatic treatment is levodopa. With long-term use, levodopa causes motor complications including involuntary movements and response fluctuations. These have lead to more cautious prescribing of levodopa. Dopamine agonists can be used as an alternative initial therapy to delay the onset of motor complications but at the expense of more dopaminergic adverse events, poorer control of motor symptoms, and increased cost. Once motor complications have developed, adjuvant therapy with dopamine agonists or entacapone can reduce off time and levodopa dose. Severe fluctuations that are not controlled by oral combination therapy can be controlled with subcutaneous apomorphine injections or infusions.     

Dopamine agonists in the treatment of Parkinson's disease

Dopamine agonists are highly effective as adjunctive therapy to levodopa in advanced Parkinson's disease and have rapidly gained popularity as a monotherapy in the early stages of Parkinson's disease for patients less than 65-70 years old. In the latter case, dopamine agonists are about as effective as levodopa but patients demonstrate a lower tendency to develop motor complications. However, dopamine agonists lose efficacy over time and the number of patients remaining on agonist monotherapy decreases to less than 50% after 3 years of treatment. Thus, after a few years of treatment the majority of patients who started on dopamine agonists will be administered levodopa, in a combined dopaminergic therapy, in order to achieve a better control of motor symptoms.     

Milestones in Parkinson's disease therapeutics

In the mid‐1980s, the treatment of Parkinson's disease was quite exclusively centered on dopatherapy and was focusing on dopamine systems and motor symptoms. A few dopamine agonists and a monoamine oxidase B inhibitor (selegiline) were used as adjuncts in advanced Parkinson's disease. In the early 2010s, levodopa remains the gold standard. New insights into the organization of the basal ganglia paved the way for deep brain stimulation, especially of the subthalamic nucleus, providing spectacular improvement of drug‐refractory levodopa‐induced motor complications. Novel dopamine agonists (pramipexole, ropinirole, rotigotine), catecholmethyltransferase inhibitors (entacapone), and monoamine oxidase B inhibitors (rasagiline) have also been developed to provide more continuous oral delivery of dopaminergic stimulation in order to improve motor outcomes. Using dopamine agonists early, before levodopa, proved to delay the onset of dyskinesia, although this is achieved at the price of potentially disabling daytime somnolence or impulse control disorders. The demonstration of an antidyskinetic effect of the glutamate antagonist amantadine opened the door for novel nondopaminergic approaches of Parkinson's disease therapy. More recently, nonmotor symptoms (depression, dementia, and psychosis) have been the focus of the first randomized controlled trials in this field. Despite therapeutic advances, Parkinson's disease continues to be a relentlessly progressive disorder leading to severe disability. Neuroprotective interventions able to modify the progression of Parkinson's disease have stood out as a failed therapeutic goal over the last 2 decades, despite potentially encouraging results with compounds like rasagiline. Newer molecular targets, new animal models, novel clinical trial designs, and biomarkers to assess disease modification have created hope for future therapeutic interventions. © 2011 Movement Disorder Society     

Treatment of Parkinson''s disease

The aim of current treatment of Parkinson's disease is to ameliorate the symptoms while seeking to lessen the potential development of late levodopa complications. To this end, there is ample evidence that the early use of dopamine agonists is beneficial in younger Parkinsonian patients but monotherapy with dopamine agonists is for only a select few. Nonergot dopamine agonists offer the potential for fewer side effects. Lower dose levodopa therapy delays the onset and reduces severity of dyskinesia and end of dose failure. However levodopa remains the treatment of choice in Parkinson's disease and should not be restricted unnecessarily in patients with disability. There is no evidence that levodopa is toxic to dopaminergic neurons in people with Parkinson's disease. As yet, no drugs are of proven neuroprotective value. Dopamine agonists, catechol-o-methyltransferase inhibitors, amantadine and apomorphine have differing but beneficial roles in the management of levodopa side effects. Ablative surgery and deep brain stimulation of thalamus, globus pallidus and subthalamic nucleus are increasingly available but choice of procedure depends not just on patient symptomatology, but also on local experience and results. Ideally, deep brain stimulation is the treatment of choice as it offers less morbidity than bilateral ablative surgery, the possibility of postoperative adjustments and the potential for reversibility if better treatments become available.     

International Parkinson and movement disorder society evidence‐based medicine review: Update on treatments for the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease

Objective: The objective of this review was to update evidence‐based medicine recommendations for treating motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). Background: The Movement Disorder Society Evidence‐Based Medicine Committee recommendations for treatments of PD were first published in 2002 and updated in 2011, and we continued the review to December 31, 2016. Methods: Level I studies of interventions for motor symptoms were reviewed. Criteria for inclusion and quality scoring were as previously reported. Five clinical indications were considered, and conclusions regarding the implications for clinical practice are reported. Results: A total of 143 new studies qualified. There are no clinically useful interventions to prevent/delay disease progression. For monotherapy of early PD, nonergot dopamine agonists, oral levodopa preparations, selegiline, and rasagiline are clinically useful. For adjunct therapy in early/stable PD, nonergot dopamine agonists, rasagiline, and zonisamide are clinically useful. For adjunct therapy in optimized PD for general or specific motor symptoms including gait, rivastigmine is possibly useful and physiotherapy is clinically useful; exercise‐based movement strategy training and formalized patterned exercises are possibly useful. There are no new studies and no changes in the conclusions for the prevention/delay of motor complications. For treating motor fluctuations, most nonergot dopamine agonists, pergolide, levodopa ER, levodopa intestinal infusion, entacapone, opicapone, rasagiline, zonisamide, safinamide, and bilateral STN and GPi DBS are clinically useful. For dyskinesia, amantadine, clozapine, and bilateral STN DBS and GPi DBS are clinically useful. Conclusions: The options for treating PD symptoms continues to expand. These recommendations allow the treating physician to determine which intervention to recommend to an individual patient. © 2018 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society     

D1 and functionally selective dopamine agonists as neuroprotective agents in Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that results in major motor disturbances due primarily to loss of midbrain dopamine neurons. The mainstream treatment has been dopaminergic replacement therapy aimed at symptomatic relief, with the gold standard drug being the dopamine precursor levodopa. The general dogma has been that levodopa works primarily by indirectly activating the D(2) family of dopamine receptors. Recently, a number of direct dopamine agonists that target the D(2) and D(3) dopamine receptors have been used as dopaminergic replacement strategies. Although these direct D(2) and D(3) drugs cause only modest improvement in motor function compared to levodopa, they can delay the initiation of levodopa and can act synergistically with levodopa. In addition, they can delay the onset of levodopa-related motor complications. Recent imaging data also suggest that they may have neuroprotective effects. Whereas D(2)/D(3) agonists have received much attention as several drugs are available for clinical trials and usage, there has been a large body of data showing that the D(1) receptor actually may play a larger role in restoration of normal motor function. This review examines the current use of dopamine D(2)/D(3) agonists in treatment of PD and their potential for providing neuroprotection. Furthermore, we also examine the potential that D(1) agonists might have in neuroprotective actions in the disease progression.     

Drug treatment of Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disease. While its cause remains elusive, much progress has been made regarding its treatment. Available drugs have a good symptomatic effect, but none has yet been shown to slow the progression of the disease in humans. The most efficacious drug is levodopa, but it remains unclear whether the symptomatic benefit is associated with neurotoxic effects and long-term deterioration. The long-term problem associated with levodopa is the appearance of dyskinesias, which is significantly delayed among patients treated with dopamine agonists as initial therapy. Less clear is the role of other drugs in PD, such as monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), including selegiline and rasagiline, the putative N-meihyl-o-aspartaie (NMDA) receptor antagonists amantadine and memantine, and the muscarinic receptor blockers. All these may be used as initial therapy and delay the use of dopaminergic drugs, or can be added later to reduce specific symptoms (tremor or dyskinesias). Advanced PD is frequently associated with cognitive decline. To some extent, this can be helped by treatment with cholinesterase inhibitors such as rivastigmine. Similarly, hallucinations and delusions affect PD patients in the advanced stages of their disease. The use of classical neuroleptic drugs in these patients is contraindicated because of their extrapyramidal effects, but atypical drugs, and particularly clozapine, are very helpful. The big void in the therapy of PD lies in the more advanced stages. Several motor symptoms, like postural instability, dysphagia, and dysphonia, as well as dyskinesias, are poorly controlled by existing drugs. New therapies should also be developed against autonomic symptoms, particularly constipation.     

Parkinson's disease therapy: tailoring choices for early and late disease, young and old patients

Advances in the understanding of basal ganglia circuitry and its altered function in disease states such as Parkinson's disease (PD), coupled with new insights into the mechanisms of cell death and new findings from therapeutic clinical trials, are being translated into clinical practice. Although levodopa (L-Dopa) remains the most effective drug in the symptomatic treatment of PD, the emergence of side effects, particularly motor fluctuations and dyskinesias, limits its usefulness. Therefore, many parkinsonologists now advocate therapeutic strategies designed to delay the onset of L-Dopa therapy to delay the onset of L-Dopa-related motor complications. The therapeutic approach to PD, however, must be individualized and based on factors such as age of the patient, stage of the disease, and degree of interference of the symptoms with social and occupational functioning, associated symptoms such as cognitive impairment, and response to treatment. This review summarizes the current therapeutic strategies, but it is important to emphasize that the treatment recommendations must be tailored to the needs of individual patients.     

Drug insight: Continuous dopaminergic stimulation in the treatment of Parkinson's disease

Continuous dopaminergic stimulation is a therapeutic strategy for the management of Parkinson's disease, which proposes that dopaminergic agents that provide continuous stimulation of striatal dopamine receptors will delay or prevent the onset of levodopa-related motor complications. Dopaminergic neurons in the basal ganglia normally fire in a random but continuous manner, so that striatal dopamine concentrations are maintained at a relatively constant level. In the dopamine-depleted state, however, intermittent oral doses of levodopa induce discontinuous stimulation of striatal dopamine receptors. This pulsatile stimulation leads to molecular and physiologic changes in basal ganglia neurons and the development of motor complications. These effects are reduced or avoided when dopaminergic therapies are delivered in a more continuous and physiologic manner. Studies in primate models and patients with Parkinson's disease have shown that continuous or long-acting dopaminergic agents are associated with a decreased risk of motor complications compared with short-acting dopamine agonists or levodopa formulations. Continuous dopaminergic stimulation can be achieved with a continuous infusion, but infusion therapies are cumbersome and not likely to be acceptable to patients with early disease. The current challenge is to develop a long-acting oral formulation of levodopa that provides comparable anti-parkinsonian benefits without motor complications.     

Pharmacotherapy of Parkinson’s disease in Germany

Treatment standards or guidelines have been developed for most features of Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, data on the actual treatment that is put into practice are scarce. In 2000, a nationwide survey on the topic of sudden onset of sleep (SOS) in PD was initiated among the members of the German patient support group (deutsche Parkinson–Vereinigung, dPV). A part of this mailed questionnaire survey covering the antiparkinsonian and concomitant medication of the participants is presented here. This study analyses data sets from more than 6,500 PD patients. The mean dopaminergic dose was equivalent to 599 ± 387 mg levodopa/die. The most frequently administered drugs were levodopa (94.2 %), dopamine agonists (DA) (71.7 %), amantadine (40.1 %), selegiline (27.6 %), entacapone (20.4 %), budipine (12.3 %), and anticholinergics (11.8 %). Costs of pharmacotherapy were estimated to be approximately € 399 million/year in Germany. PD drug therapy in general strongly depended on age, disease duration, and the level of care. The treatment guidelines were apparently not consistently followed underlining the need for their continuous propagation throughout the medical community. In addition our data suggest that non–motor symptoms in PD are not adequately treated and that concomitant sedative medication contributes to the occurrence of SOS.     

Workshop II: "neuroprotection"--the Lugano consensus

Consensus could be reached that there is overwhelming evidence of preclinical neuroprotection. However, the evidence of neuroprotection/neurorescue under clinical conditions is limited. Lessons from clinical trials designed to show neuroprotection (selegiline, amantadine, dopamine agonists) demonstrate that with the drugs available neuroprotection/neurorescue has to start as early as possible. A PET-controlled clinical trial with ropinirole shows that there seems to be a good chance for neuroprotection in the early phase of Parkinson's disease in patients treated from the very beginning of the disease while there is no such benefit in patients with a late start of a neuroprotective therapeutic strategy. Also long-term neuroprotection cannot be reached. Complicating factors to demonstrate clinical neuroprotection are discussed.     

Arguments for the use of dopamine receptor agonists in clinical and preclinical Parkinson's disease

On the basis of experimental studies which have demonstrated deleterious effects of L-DOPA (L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine) in vivo and in vitro, it has been suggested that L-DOPA itself may contribute to the progression of Parkinson's disease. This hypothesis is, for many clinicians, the rationale for postponing the employment of and reducing the applied dosage of L-DOPA and for beginning therapy with dopamine receptor agonists or the monoamine oxidase type B (MAO-B) inhibitor selegiline. Furthermore, clinical studies have demonstrated that early treatment with dopamine receptor agonists is associated with a lower incidence of motor fluctuations and dyskinesia. Dopamine receptor agonists exert their symptomatic effect by directly activating dopamine receptors, bypassing the presynaptic synthesis of dopamine and the degenerating nigro-striatal dopaminergic system. They can thus also be of benefit late in the therapy of the disorder. In addition, the pharmacological profile of dopamine receptor agonists suggests a possible neuroprotective effect. This paper reviews briefly the pharmacology of dopamine receptor agonists and basic knowledge concerning the dopamine receptor stimulation which underlies their therapeutic effect. Preclinical approaches for demonstrating neuroprotective effects and their clinical relevance are also discussed.     

Practical importance of neuroprotection in Parkinson's disease

Consensus could be reached that there is overwhelming evidence of preclinical neuroprotection. However, the evidence of neuroprotection/neurorescue under clinical conditions is limited. Lessons from clinical trials designed to show neuroprotection (selegiline, amantadine, dopamine agonists) demonstrate that with the drugs available neuroprotection/neurorescue has to start as early as possible. A PET-controlled clinical trial with ropinirole shows that there seems to be a good chance for neuroprotection in the early phase of Parkinson's disease in patients treated from the very beginning of the disease while there is no such benefit in patients with a late start of a neuroprotective therapeutic strategy. Also long-term clinical neuroprotection cannot be reached. Complicating factors to demonstrate clinical neuroprotection are discussed.     

Prevention and treatment of motor fluctuations

The symptoms of Parkinson's disease can become increasingly difficult to control as the disease advances, particularly with the development of motor complications, such as end-of-dose wearing-off and dyskinesias, following long-term therapy. At this stage, the patient is frequently referred to a Parkinson's disease specialist for advice on the management of their disease. In this review we provide an overview of the Parkinson's disease specialist's strategies for coping with such problems. This includes strategy to prevent or delay motor fluctuations and the concept of the long duration response. The paper also includes establishing the optimum and most rational levodopa treatment schedule, improving levodopa absorption, use of COMT-inhibition, the addition of oral dopaminergic agonists, and the use of subcutaneous injections or infusions of apomorphine or lisuride. Finally, we highlight the increasing importance of treatment strategies that stimulate dopamine receptors in a more continuous, less pulsatile manner as a way of reducing the risk of developing treatment-associated motor complications.     

Motor complications in Parkinson's disease

Management of motor complications in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) can be challenging. The main complications are inadequate dopaminergic tone ("off" time and dose failures) and excess dopaminergic tone (dyskinesia). These motor complications increase as PD progresses. Changing the dose and timing of L-dopa is the main strategy for both scenarios. Reducing "off" time can also be achieved by the addition of adjunctive therapies (dopamine agonists, catechol-O-methyl transferase inhibitors, and monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors). Dyskinesia can improve with amantadine and possibly several other medications. Surgical interventions such as lesioning and deep brain stimulation are considered when pharmacological strategies for motor complications are not satisfactory.