单孔腹腔镜腹壁切口疝无张力修补术

目的 探讨应用单孔腹腔镜器械行腹壁切口疝无张力疝修补的可行性及治疗效果.方法 对1例二次腹部术后出现腹壁切口疝的女性病人,应用单孔腹腔镜器械行无张力疝修补.患者取仰卧位,全身麻醉,于左腋前线平脐平面建立长约2.5 cm横行切口,放置Tri-port,电刀分离粘连,将补片通过Tri-port放入腹腔,通过钩针及螺旋钉枪(Protack)将补片固定在腹壁上. 结果 手术时间90 min,术中出血量＜10ml,术后住院时间7d.术后1月复查切口愈合好,疝无复发. 结论 应用单孔腹腔镜器械行腹壁切口疝无张力疝修补安全可行,手术时间与传统腹腔镜时间无明显差别,但其更具微创美容效果.     

腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修补术治疗体会

<正>腹壁切口疝是腹部外科术后常见的并发症,其发生率10%～15%[1]。随着微创技术的兴起,腹腔镜切口疝修补的作用越来越重要。腹腔镜与开放式修补术相比,复发率没有明显区别,而在住院时间、恢复活动时间和创伤程度等方面具有明显的优势[2],并且腹腔镜切口疝修补术的术后感染率低于开放式手术[3]。我科开展6例腹腔镜较大腹壁切口疝修补术,现报道如下。     

腹腔镜下无张力疝修补术治疗腹壁切口疝的临床疗效观察

目的观察腹腔镜下无张力疝修补术治疗腹壁切口疝的效果。方法对26例术后切口疝患者应用腹腔镜行无张力疝修补术。回顾性分析患者的临床资料。结果 26例均顺利完成手术,手术时间55~97 min,术后住院时间4~10 d。术后腹壁血清肿2例,未发生切口感染等其他并发症。患者均获随访6~12个月,无复发病例。结论腹腔镜下无张力疝修补术治疗腹壁切口疝,复发率低、并发症少,术后恢复快。     

腹壁切口疝的腹腔镜修补术

近年来 ,腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修补手术作为无张力疝修补的一种方式 ,应用于治疗腹壁切口疝。与开腹腹壁切口疝手术相比 ,具有术后恢复快 ,并发症少 ,复发率低等优势 ,应用逐步广泛。本文就腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修补手术的操作、恢复、并发症及复发等方面做一综述     

腹壁切口疝的腹腔镜修补术及相关问题

腹壁切口疝是指由于腹部手术切口愈合不良而发生于原腹部手术切口的疝,其发生率可达2％-11％,临床体检可触及原手术切口下的腹壁缺损,可伴有或不伴有腹壁包块,影像学检查（如CT）可有明确显示。腹壁切口疝不能自行愈合,手术是主要的治疗方法。虽然采用何种腹壁切口疝修补术武更合理目前尚无统一的公认结论,但近年来随着修补材料的不断更新,腹壁切口疝修补技术进展迅速,包括腹腔镜修补术也已开展应用,并取得了良好的临床效果。现结合腹腔镜疝修补术对腹壁切口疝若干问题进行探讨。     

腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修补术25例

目的探讨腹腔镜治疗腹壁切口疝的手术方式及其疗效。方法回顾性分析2011年1月至2013年12月,江苏省苏北人民医院行腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修补术25例患者的临床资料。结果25例患者均顺利完成腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修补术,无中转开腹。手术时间90~l80 min,出血量10~30 ml。随访6~24个月,无复发。结论腹腔镜切口疝修补手术具有创伤小,复发率低,并发症少,术后恢复快,住院时间短等优点,值得推广。     

腹腔镜下经腹腔腹壁切口疝修补术16例体会

目的探讨腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前网片修补术治疗腹壁切口疝的特点及疗效。方法回顾分析2005年11月至2008年8月16例患者腹壁切口疝采用腹腔镜手术治疗的临床资料。结果14例手术均在腹腔镜下完成，两例因粘连中转手术，手术时间65～85min，平均73min；术后2～48h患者下床活动，住院4—6d，无并发症发生，术后随访2～24个月，1例复发（6．25％）。结论腹腔镜治疗腹壁切口疝是安全可行的疝修补方法，遵循疝修补无张力的原则，具有患者痛苦轻、康复快等特点，是治疗腹壁切口疝的有效手段。     

腹腔镜技术在切口疝修补术中的应用体会

目的探讨腹腔镜下应用补片修补切口疝的手术方法和II缶床效果。方法回顾性分析我科2006年1月至2008年12月对腹壁切口疝23例施行腹腔镜修补术的临床资料。结果本组成功施行腹腔镜下切口疝补片修补22例,因腹腔内严重粘连中转剖腹手术1例,术中发现多发切口疝3例。本组无手术死亡和肠瘘病例。术后出现疼痛4例,补片周围积液3例。全组获随访4～24个月,平均13．8个月,未见切口疝复发。结论腹壁切口疝病人行腹腔镜下补片修补大多是安全地,还可在术中发现隐性缺损。对腹腔内广泛粘连分离困难者,应及时中转剖腹手术。     

腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修补术的术式评价

<正>腹壁切口疝是腹部手术常见的并发症之一,占腹外疝第3位,虽经不断的技术革新,但开放式手术复发率及并发症发生率仍较高。1992年以来,腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修补术以并发症少、复发率低及微创等优点,在欧美国家已逐渐开展且备受推崇,而我国腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修补术尚处于起步阶段。现对腹腔镜切口疝修补术做一初步评价。     

腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术15例

目的探讨腹腔镜下应用补片行腹壁切口疝修补术的方法、安全性及临床疗效。方法2008年5月至2009年5月,对15例腹壁切口疝进行腹腔镜下补片修补术。结果14例腹腔镜下行腹腔粘连松解和补片固定,顺利完成切口疝修补手术;1例因肠管与腹壁及疝环致密粘连而中转开放切口疝修补术。术后腹壁修补区域疼痛10例(71.4%),疝环和补片间出现浆液肿4例(28.6%),无肠瘘和死亡病例,未发生手术相关的感染。术后随访3～12个月,平均7.5个月,未见复发。结论在腹腔镜下行腹腔粘连松解,采用疝钉合器与缝线贯穿腹壁全层固定补片可以修补大多数腹壁切口疝,同时还可以发现其他的隐匿性疝,是一种安全、有效的微创手术方法,值得临床推广。     

��ǻ���޲��෢�Ը����п���

??Laparoscopic herniorraphy for abdominal multiple incisional hernia XU Da-hua, LIU Jia-feng, LIU Dong-bin, et al. Department of General Surgery, Xuan Wu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China Corresponding author: XU Da-hua, E-mail: dahuax @ yahoo.com.cn Abstract Objective To evaluate the surgical skill and the efficacy of laparoscopic herniorraphy for abdominal multiple incisional hernia. Methods A complicated case of four position abdominal incisional hernia from three times of surgery admitted in February 2008 at Beijing Xuan Wu Hospital of Capital Medical University was treated by laparoscopic herniorraphy with laparoscopic hernia clip and a large composix mesh. Results The length of hernia defects was 12cm, 9cm, 6cm and 3cm. A laparoscopic herniorraphy was succeed in the case of abdominal multiple incisional hernia without complication of intestinal injury. The case was followed-up for 6 months and no abdominal incisional hernia recurrent. Conclusion Laparoscopic herniorraphy is safe and effective for abdominal multiple incisional hernia. Laparoscopic herniorraphy is simple for the exploration of abdominal multiple incisional hernia defects, but open herniorraphy is more difficult. Laparoscopic herniorraphy is not only a minimally invasive surgery, but also a superior surgical skill for abdominal multiple incisional hernia.     

The feasibility of adopting laparoscopic incisional hernia repair in general surgery practice: early outcomes in an unselected series of patients

A laparoscopic approach to incisional hernia repair has been shown to be safe and effective in selected patients. We report our early outcomes following laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair (LVHR) in an unselected series of patients encountered in general surgery practice. All patients referred with incisional hernia were offered a laparoscopic repair using prosthetic mesh. Patients were not excluded from laparoscopic approach on the basis of age, previous surgery, defect size, intraperitoneal mesh, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, or abdominal wall stomas. We followed 28 consecutive patients who underwent LVHR (17 primary, 11 recurrent hernias). Laparoscopic repair was completed in 27 patients with a mean operative time of 141.6 +/- 11.9 minutes. There were no intraoperative complications. The mean size of the abdominal wall defects was 153.4 +/- 27.5 cm and the mean mesh size was 349.2 +/- 59.1 cm. The mean hospital stay was 3.7 +/- 0.3 days. Nine patients developed large wound seromas; all spontaneously resolved. Our experience suggests that LVHR is feasible as a primary approach to most incisional hernias encountered in general surgery practice.     

Laparoscopic ePTFE mesh repair of incisional and ventral hernias

Incisional hernia is a relatively frequent complication of abdominal surgery. The use of mesh to repair incisional and ventral hernias results in lower recurrence rates compared with primary suture techniques. The laparoscopic approach may be associated with lower postoperative morbidity compared with open procedures. Long-term recurrence rates after laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernias are not well defined. A prospective study of the initial experience of a standardized technique of laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair carried out in a tertiary referral hospital was undertaken between January 2003 and February 2007. Laparoscopic hernia repair was attempted in 71 patients and was successful in 68 (conversion rate 4%). The mean age of the patients identified was 63.1 years (39 men and 31 women). Multiple hernial defects were identified in 38 patients (56%), and the mean overall size of the fascial defects was 166 cm(2). The mean mesh size used was 403 cm(2). The mean operative time was 121 minutes. There were six (9%) major complications in this series, but there were no deaths. Hernia recurrence was noted in four patients (6%) at a mean follow up of 20 months. Our preliminary experience indicates that laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair is technically feasible and has acceptable postoperative morbidity and low early recurrence rates.     

Laparoscopic repair of incisional and parastomal hernias after major genitourinary or abdominal surgery

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Abdominal wall or parastomal hernias following major genitourinary or abdominal surgery are a significant surgical problem. Open surgical repair is difficult because of adhesion formation and poor definition of the hernia fascial edges. Laparoscopic intervention has allowed effective correction of these abdominal wall hernias. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From November 1997 to June 2000, 14 male and 3 female patients underwent laparoscopic abdominal wall herniorrhaphy at our institution. Of these, 13 patients received incisional and 4 parastomal hernia repair. All hernia defects were repaired using a measured piece of Gore-Tex DualMesh. A retrospective review of each patient's history and operative characteristics was undertaken. RESULTS: All repairs were successful. No patient required conversion to an open procedure, and there were no intraoperative complications. The average operative time was 4 (range 2.5-6.5) and 4.3 (range 3.75-5.5) hours in the incisional and parastomal group, respectively. The average hospital stay was 4.9 days (range 2-12) for the incisional group and 3.8 (range 3-4) days for the parastomal group. To date, two patients experienced a recurrence of incisional hernias, at 5 and 8 months postoperatively. No recurrences have developed in the parastomal hernia repairs at 2 to 33 months. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic repair of abdominal wall incisional or parastomal hernias provides an excellent anatomic correction of such defects. Adhesions are lysed under magnified laparoscopic vision, and the true limits of the fascial defects are clearly identified. The DualMesh is easy to work with and has yielded excellent results. A comparison with open repair with respect to perioperative factors and long-term success is currently under way.     

Laparoscopic repair of incisional hernia

BACKGROUND: In this long-term retrospective study, a laparoscopic technique was used for incisional hernia repair. METHODS: Over a 6-year period, we performed laparoscopic repairs with prosthetic mesh in 159 patients suffering from incisional hernia. Morbidity factors were noted and operative data were collected. In addition, early and long-term complications and recurrences were analyzed. RESULTS: There were no deaths as a result of the procedure. In 21 patients (13.8%), the operation was converted to an open procedure. Small bowel perforation occurred in three patients (1.9%). Mean hospital stay was 3.5 days. Early complications occurred in 61 patients (44%). The mean follow-up time was 49 months. There were no infections of the prosthetic mesh. Residual abdominal pain was reported in 31 patients (26%). Bowel obstructions requiring resection were found in two patients (1%), and hernia recurrence was observed in 19 patients (15.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic herniorraphy is a promising technique with all the advantages of minimal-invasive surgery. Nevertheless, close attention needs to be paid to the choice of the hernia and mesh size and to the fixing of the mesh.     

腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术20例

目的 探讨腹腔镜治疗腹壁切口疝的安全性及有效性.方法 回顾性分析2009年6月至2011年9月20例腹壁切口疝患者的资料.其中男14例,女6例,年龄26 ～ 76岁,平均57.3岁.距离上次手术时间间隔为4～26个月,平均7个月.腹正中切口13例,侧腹部切口7例.有2例为缝合修补术后复发病例.结果 所有患者均采用复合补片进行修补,腹壁缺损大小4cmx5cm～ 10cm×13 cm.手术时间40～ 170 min,平均100 min.术后所有患者切口Ⅰ期愈合,术后补片上方疝囊内积液5例,经局部穿刺抽吸并加压包扎后治愈.术后修补区域腹壁疼痛1例,给予口服美洛昔康片对症处理,于术后3个月内逐渐消失.术后住院时间4～13d,平均7d.18例患者获得随访,随访6～30个月,平均15个月,1例复发.结论 腹腔镜下复合补片修补腹壁切口疝具有损伤小、术后疼痛轻、并发症少、恢复快等优点,值得推广.     

Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair as first therapeutic choice

AIM: Incisional hernias are one of the most frequent complications of open abdominal surgery. Historically, the best results have been obtained with the open rives-stoppa approach. This is done by fixing a large piece of prosthetic mesh behind the rectus muscle. Laparoscopic approach allows similar mesh placement with minimal dissection and lower recurrence rate compared to the open mesh repair. METHODS: Between October 2001 to September 2003, 75 consecutive patients were scheduled to undergo laparoscopic incisional hernia repair with ePTFE mesh (Gore-Tex Dualmesh Plus). Postoperative complications were recorded and analysed. RESULTS: Most were obese affected by multiple wall defects Conversion to open surgery was required in 1 case Postoperative complications occurred 13.3%. Recurrence occurred in one only case. CONCLUSIONS: The key to the success of this procedure is avoidance of complications. The laparoscopic approach is safe, effective and relatively complication-free option in the management of patients presenting with a first time or recurrent incisional hernia and recommended as the treatment of choice.     

Incisional hernia after extreme lateral interbody fusion on the lumbar spine: A case report

IntroductionExtreme lateral interbody fusion is a minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach for spine surgery. We herein report a case of an incisional hernia after an extreme lateral interbody fusion on the lumbar spine that was successfully treated by laparoscopic surgery with intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair.Presentation of caseA 78-year-old woman was referred to our hospital with a complaint of left abdominal bulge and pain. She had undergone an extreme lateral interbody fusion for a lumbar spinal canal stenosis from L1 to L4 a year prior. Abdominal computerized tomography showed a left lumbar incisional hernia, and laparoscopic surgery was performed. The hernia orifice was sutured closed and covered with mesh. The patient was discharged five days after the operation with no complications.DiscussionWhen performing XLIF for a spinal disorder, the muscles should be separated bluntly along their fibers to prevent muscle atrophy, and the incised fascia should be securely sutured closed. Abdominal wall incisional hernias can occur after spinal surgeries such as extreme lateral interbody fusion.ConclusionLaparoscopic repair for abdominal wall incisional hernia after spine surgery is safe and feasible.     

Laparoscopic repair of incisional and ventral hernia

The application of laparoscopic principles to ventral or incisional hernia repair has recently been shown to be a safe and effective alternative to open procedures. In this study we analyzed our recent experience with laparoscopic incisional-ventral hernia repair. The outcomes of 75 consecutive patients (January 2002 to July 2006) who underwent laparoscopic repair for incisional-ventral hernia were reviewed. Patient's demographics, hernia parameters, and intraoperative and postoperative data were collected. Of the 75 patients, 44 were females and 31 males. Mean age was 59.1 yrs (range 29-80 yrs). Mean BMI was 25.9 (range 19.4-36.7). Twenty-one patients had primary ventral hernias while 54 patients had an incisional hernia. Fifty-three patients had a single defect and 22 patients multiple defects. In 45 cases the incisional hernia was a primary hernia; in 4 cases it was a first recurrence; in 2 cases a 2nd recurrence; and in 3 cases a 3rd recurrence. The mean defect size was 52,7 cm2 (range 4-432). Laparoscopic hernia repair was successfully performed in 71 cases (94.7%). The mean mesh size was 211 cm2 (range 63-694). Mean operating time was 101 min (range 50-220 min). The mean hospital stay was 4.7 days. The postoperative morbidity rate was 14%. After a mean follow-up of 24.6 months (range 7-56) the recurrence rate was 7% (5/71). Laparoscopic repair of incisional-ventral hernias seems to be safe and effective. Medium-term outcomes were promising with a relatively low rate of conversion to open surgery, a low complication rate and a low risk of recurrence.