Letrozole in the neoadjuvant setting: the P024 trial

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy trials have consistently reported lower response rates in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer when compared with HR- cases. Preoperative endocrine therapy has therefore become a logical alternative and has gained considerable momentum from the finding that aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are more effective than tamoxifen for HR+ breast cancer in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. The most convincing neoadjuvant trial to demonstrate the superiority of an AI versus tamoxifen was the P024 study, a large multinational double-blind trial in postmenopausal women with HR+ breast cancer ineligible for breast-conserving surgery. The overall response rate (ORR) was 55% for letrozole and 36% for tamoxifen (P<0.001). Significantly more letrozole-treated patients underwent breast-conserving surgery (45 vs. 35%, respectively; P=0.022). In addition, ORR was significantly higher with letrozole than tamoxifen in the human epidermal growth factor receptor HER1/HER2+ subgroup (P=0.0004). The clinical efficacy of letrozole in HER2+ breast cancer was confirmed by fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis and was found to be comparable to that of HER2- cases (ORR 71% in both subsets). Biomarker studies confirmed the superiority of letrozole in centrally assessed estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) tumors and found a strong relationship with the degree of ER positivity for both agents. Interestingly, letrozole was effective even in marginally ER+ tumors and, unlike tamoxifen, consistently reduced the expression from estrogen-regulated genes (progesterone receptor and trefoil factor 1). Furthermore, when analyzed by Ki67 immunohistochemistry, letrozole was significantly more effective than tamoxifen in reducing tumor proliferation (P=0.0009). Thus, neoadjuvant letrozole is safe and superior to tamoxifen in the treatment of postmenopausal women with HR+ locally advanced breast cancer.     

Letrozole in the neoadjuvant setting: the P024 trial

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy trials have consistently reported lower response rates in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer when compared with HR? cases. Preoperative endocrine therapy has therefore become a logical alternative and has gained considerable momentum from the finding that aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are more effective than tamoxifen for HR+ breast cancer in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. The most convincing neoadjuvant trial to demonstrate the superiority of an AI versus tamoxifen was the P024 study, a large multinational double-blind trial in postmenopausal women with HR+ breast cancer ineligible for breast-conserving surgery. The overall response rate (ORR) was 55% for letrozole and 36% for tamoxifen (P < 0.001). Significantly more letrozole-treated patients underwent breast-conserving surgery (45 vs. 35%, respectively; P = 0.022). In addition, ORR was significantly higher with letrozole than tamoxifen in the human epidermal growth factor receptor HER1/HER2+ subgroup (P = 0.0004). The clinical efficacy of letrozole in HER2+ breast cancer was confirmed by fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis and was found to be comparable to that of HER2? cases (ORR 71% in both subsets). Biomarker studies confirmed the superiority of letrozole in centrally assessed estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) tumors and found a strong relationship with the degree of ER positivity for both agents. Interestingly, letrozole was effective even in marginally ER+ tumors and, unlike tamoxifen, consistently reduced the expression from estrogen-regulated genes (progesterone receptor and trefoil factor 1). Furthermore, when analyzed by Ki67 immunohistochemistry, letrozole was significantly more effective than tamoxifen in reducing tumor proliferation (P = 0.0009). Thus, neoadjuvant letrozole is safe and superior to tamoxifen in the treatment of postmenopausal women with HR+ locally advanced breast cancer.     

Letrozole is more effective neoadjuvant endocrine therapy than tamoxifen for ErbB-1- and/or ErbB-2-positive, estrogen receptor-positive primary breast cancer: evidence from a phase III randomized trial.

PURPOSE: Expression of ErbB-1 and ErbB-2 (epidermal growth factor receptor and HER2/neu) in breast cancer may cause tamoxifen resistance, but not all studies concur. Additionally, the relationship between ErbB-1 and ErbB-2 expression and response to selective aromatase inhibitors is unknown. A neoadjuvant study for primary breast cancer that randomized treatment between letrozole and tamoxifen provided a context within which these issues could be addressed prospectively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Postmenopausal patients with estrogen- and/or progesterone receptor-positive (ER+ and/or PgR+) primary breast cancer ineligible for breast-conserving surgery were randomly assigned to 4 months of neoadjuvant letrozole 2.5 mg daily or tamoxifen 20 mg daily in a double-blinded study. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for ER and PgR was conducted on pretreatment biopsies and assessed by the Allred score. ErbB-1 and ErbB-2 IHC were assessed by intensity and completeness of membranous staining according to published criteria. RESULTS: For study biopsy-confirmed ER+ and/or PgR+ cases that received letrozole, 60% responded and 48% underwent successful breast-conserving surgery. The response to tamoxifen was inferior (41%, P =.004), and fewer patients underwent breast conservation (36%, P =.036). Differences in response rates between letrozole and tamoxifen were most marked for tumors that were positive for ErbB-1 and/or ErbB-2 and ER (88% v 21%, P =.0004). CONCLUSION: ER+, ErbB-1+, and/or ErbB-2+ primary breast cancer responded well to letrozole, but responses to tamoxifen were infrequent. This suggests that ErbB-1 and ErbB-2 signaling through ER is ligand-dependent and that the growth-promoting effects of these receptor tyrosine kinases on ER+ breast cancer can be inhibited by potent estrogen deprivation therapy.     

来曲唑在老年乳腺癌新辅助内分泌治疗中的疗效观察

目的探讨来曲唑在老年绝经后乳腺癌新辅助内分泌治疗中的近期疗效,耐受性及与临床病理因素的相关性。方法对58例绝经后激素受体阳性的乳腺癌患者进行来曲唑新辅助内分泌治疗,以他莫昔芬新辅助内分泌治疗为对照组。结果来曲唑组临床疗效显著优于他莫昔芬组（P〈0.05）。来曲唑组临床分期晚,ER及PR均阳性的有效率高,与HER-2表达无关。他莫昔芬组HER-2阳性的有效率低。2组治疗前后Ki-67水平均显著下降,有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。2组未出现明显不良反应。结论绝经后、激素受体阳性的乳腺癌选择来曲唑新辅助内分泌治疗安全,有效,尤其适合有合并症的老年体弱者。     

Pathological features of breast cancer response following neoadjuvant treatment with either letrozole or tamoxifen

Morphological characteristics, grading features, proliferation marker MIB1, apoptosis (by Tdt-mediated duTP-biotin nick-end labelling (TUNEL)), Bcl-2 expression, oestrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) status were compared in ER-positive breast cancers before and after 3 months of neoadjuvant therapy with either letrozole or tamoxifen. Daily treatment was with letrozole 2.5 mg (12 patients) or 10 mg (12 patients), or with tamoxifen 20 mg(24 patients). Letrozole treatment was associated with a pathological response in 17 of 24 (71%) patients. The predominant change in grading features was a decrease in mitosis, and the expression of MIB1 was reduced in all of the 22 evaluable cases. Whilst only marginal changes were observed in ER expression following letrozole therapy, PgR reactivity was reduced in 20 of 21 evaluable cases which were initially PgR-positive, becoming undetectable in 16 patients. Tamoxifen treatment was associated with pathological response in 15 of 24 (63%) tumours. In contrast to letrozole, the dominant change in grading feature was an increase in tubule formation, ER score was markedly reduced in most cases, and the most common effect on PgR was an increased expression. Following treatment with either tamoxifen or letrozole, variable effects were observed on the apoptotic index and expression of Bcl-2. These results indicate that both letrozole and tamoxifen have marked influences on the pathological features of breast cancer during neoadjuvant therapy. However, the effects of the two agents varied such that the phenotypes of letrozole- and tamoxifen-treated tumours differ markedly. Effects on clinical, pathological and biological endpoints were frequently disconcordant--future studies will therefore require the evaluation of multiple parameters in order to fully assess tumour response.     

A randomised study of the effects of letrozole and anastrozole on oestrogen receptor positive breast cancers in postmenopausal women

Introduction Changes in proliferation as measured by Ki67 occur within 14 days of starting treatment with an aromatase inhibitor and these changes have been shown to be predictors of long term outcome. This study aimed to compare changes in proliferation following 14 days of treatment with anastrozole and letrozole. Methods Two hundred and six women with 209 estrogen receptor (ER) positive operable breast cancers (three bilateral) were randomly allocated to receive either 14 days treatment with 2.5 mg of letrozole or 1 mg of anastrozole prior to surgery. Changes in expression of estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptors (PgR) as assessed by ALLRED scores and proliferation as assessed by Ki67 were analysed. The HER2 status of each tumour was also assessed using a combination of the Hercept test and FISH. Results Both letrozole and anastrozole reduced ER expression (ALLRED score) by a mean of 0.32 (0.20–0.44), P < 0.001 and PgR fell by a mean of 2.54 (2.20–2.89) P < 0.0001. Letrozole reduced proliferation from a geometric mean of 6.37% to 0.81%, P < 0.0001 and anastrozole reduced proliferation from 5.81% to 0.77%, P < 0.0001. There was no differences between drugs in the fall in ER, PgR or proliferation. Both letrozole and anastrozole produced significant falls in proliferation in both HER2 positive and HER2 negative cancers, all P < 0.001. Discussion 14 days of both letrozole and anastrozole reduces proliferation, ER and PgR expression. No significant difference between these two drugs was identified. Electronic supplementary material  The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy of breast cancer: which patients would benefit and what are the advantages?

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) were more effective than tamoxifen as a neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NAE) for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. Neoadjuvant AIs were shown to reduce tumor volume and to allow the performance of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in cases that would normally require mastectomy. Predictive markers of neoadjuvant AIs may be ER-rich, progesterone receptor (PgR)-rich and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative tumors. However, the ability of HER2 expression to predict a response to neoadjuvant AIs is controversial. Pathological tumor size, nodal status, Ki67 level, and ER score are predictive for the survival of postmenopausal women with breast cancer who have been treated with NAE. These factors could be useful in order to select patients who do not require chemotherapy. Indeed, neoadjuvant AIs are a potential treatment option for postmenopausal women with ER-rich breast cancer who prefer BCS despite having large tumors suitable for mastectomy.     

Role of biologic markers in patient selection and application to disease prevention

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are now under investigation for the treatment of early stage breast cancer and for disease prevention as alternatives to standard treatment with tamoxifen. Currently identified genetic risk factors of breast cancer include BRCA-1/BRCA-2 mutations, ATM mutations, and history of high estrogen levels, as evidenced by plasma analyses and/or dense bones. To date, estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) status has predictive value for determining response to therapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (ER+ and/or PgR+ tumors). Recent studies have shown AIs to be safer and more effective than tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with advanced disease. Some data suggest that letrozole may be a more effective treatment than tamoxifen for patients with ER+ and/or PgR+ early breast cancers expressing ErbB-1 and/or ErbB-2. Changes in cell proliferation markers (e.g., S-phase fraction and Ki67 antigen), plasma lipid levels, and the bone resorption marker C-terminal peptide are biomarkers that have been evaluated for preventive and prognostic value in breast cancer patients and normal volunteers. Results from biomarker screens can be used to define inclusion criteria for clinical trials and eventually to individualize treatment. Gene expression profiling (microarray analysis), i.e., genomic and proteomic studies, will probably advance the discovery of new biomarkers for breast cancer prevention and treatment.     

Proliferation, steroid receptors and clinical/pathological response in breast cancer treated with letrozole

Sixty-three postmenopausal women with large primary breast cancers were treated with neoadjuvant letrozole (2.5 mg daily) for 3 months. Tumour samples were taken at diagnosis and after 10-14 days and 3 months treatment. Immunohistochemical staining for Ki67, oestrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) was performed and related to clinical (ClinR) and pathological responses (PathR) after 3 months treatment. ClinR was observed in 48 of 63 cases (76.2%) and PathR in 47 of 62 (75.8%). Pretreatment Ki67 scores were similar in responders (R) and non-responders (NR). Highly significant Ki67 decreases occurred in all tumour subgroups at 10-14 days (P<0.005). A significant difference in Ki67 scores at 10-14 days (P<0.007) was found between PathR and PathNR but not between ClinR and ClinNR. At 3 months, decreases from pretreatment Ki67 scores were highly significant in all tumour subgroups irrespective of response status. However, whereas Ki67 scores were significantly different between pathological R and NR (P = 0.009), the corresponding comparison of ClinR status was not. Significant decreases between 10-14 days and 3 months were found only in ClinR and PathR (P = 0.02 and 0.045, respectively). Treatment significantly reduced PgR expression at 14 days and 3 months (both P<0.0001), but the level of changes was not different between response status groups. In summary, letrozole produces rapid and profound decreases in expression of Ki67 and PgR but changes do not always correlate with clinical and pathological responses.     

Semi-quantitative evaluation of estrogen receptor expression is a strong predictive factor of pathological complete response after anthracycline-based neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in hormonal-sensitive breast cancer

Absence of hormonal receptors (HR) expression is a predictive factor of high pathologic complete response (pCR) rate after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. However, HR-positive tumors are less chemosensitive. In the present study, we evaluated the predictive value of estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR) semi-quantitative expression in patients with HR-positive tumors treated uniformly with antracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy without hormonal treatment. Value of HR expression as a predictive factor was then evaluated in a multivariate analysis with tumor grade, Ki67 index and HER2 expression. From January 2000 and December 2006, 177 patients with HR-positive breast ductal invasive carcinoma ≥2 cm in its largest diameter were treated with six cycles of an anthracycline-based neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Tumor grade, ER, PgR, HER2 status and Ki67 index were determined on microbiopsy performed before chemotherapy. A semi-quantitative evaluation of ER and PgR expression by IHC was performed using the Barnes’score. pCR rate was significantly different (P < 0.001) according to the ER expression score. pCR rate was 28% for low score, 9% for medium score and 3% for high score. On the contrary, pCR rate was not significantly different (P = 0.49) according to the PgR expression score. In the multivariate analysis, ER expression score (P = 0.0002) and Ki67 index (P = 0.02) were the only predictive factors of response for HR-positive tumors. pCR after anthracycline-based chemotherapy is significantly correlated with the ER expression score.     

Prediction of clinical outcome from primary tamoxifen by expression of biologic markers in breast cancer patients.

The aim of this study was to evaluate pretreatment clinical features and biological markers together with changes in these factors as predictors of response and relapse in patients receiving tamoxifen for primary breast cancer. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of the primary breast cancer was performed before tamoxifen treatment in 54 patients and repeated after therapy on day 14, day 60, or on both days in a subset of 35 patients. These samples were evaluated for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), Ki67, S-phase fraction and ploidy. The overall response to tamoxifen was 57% (31 of 54 patients). Pretreatment ER and PgR significantly predicted for response by univariate analysis (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.003, respectively). By multivariate analysis, ER expression was the only independent predictor of response, and it was associated with 27 times the likelihood of response (95% confidence interval, 6-136). Increase in PgR and decrease in Ki67 on day 14 significantly predicted for response to tamoxifen (P < 0.03 and P < 0.04, respectively). Lack of ER, clinical node-positive disease, and failure to decrease Ki67 on day 14 were significantly associated with increased risk of relapse (P < 0.05). By multivariate analysis, ER expression was the only independent predictor of relapse (P < 0.005). Pretreatment and early changes in molecular marker expression may assist in the prediction of response and clinical outcome in primary breast cancer patients receiving tamoxifen.     

Is triple negative a prognostic factor in breast cancer?

Background  Breast cancer is characterized by hormone dependency, and endocrine therapy is a key treatment in breast cancer. Recently, targeted therapies such as Trastuzumab treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer has been important. Triple-negative (TN) breast cancer is characterized by lack of expression of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR), and the absence of HER2 protein overexpression, and so there is no targeted therapy for this subtype. In this study, we examined the biological and prognostic characteristics in TN breast cancer. Patients and methods  Between January 1998 and September 2006, 1,552 patients with primary breast cancer were investigated retrospectively in this study and ER, PgR and HER2 status were evaluated in all cases. Furthermore, p53 overexpression and Ki67 values were examined immunohistochemically. Results  Patient distribution according to ER, PgR or HER2 status was as follows: ER and PgR positive: 57.9%, and ER and PgR negative: 25.1%. With regards to the HER2 status, HER2 positive was 23.3%, and triple negative (TN) was 14.0%. TN breast cancer has a high proliferation rate, high nuclear grade and frequent p53 overexpression. Patients with TN tumors had a significantly poorer disease-free survival (DFS) than those with non-TN tumors. After recurrence the overall survival (OS) rate in TN cases was significantly lower than that of the non-TN cases. Multivariate analysis revealed that TN was a significant factor for DFS and OS after recurrence. Conclusion  TN breast cancer is a rare subtype with a high proliferation rate and a high nuclear grade, p53 overexpression, and lower DFS/OS. To improve the prognosis of TN breast cancer, a new effective strategy needs to be developed.     

Comparison of the short-term biological effects of 7alpha-[9-(4,4,5,5,5-pentafluoropentylsulfinyl)-nonyl]estra-1,3,5, (10)-triene-3,17beta-diol (Faslodex) versus tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer

7Alpha-[9-(4,4,5,5,5-pentafluoropentylsulfinyl)-nonyl]estra-1,3,5, (10)-triene-3,17beta-diol (ICI 182,780; Faslodex) is a novel steroidal antiestrogen. This partially blind, randomized, multicenter study compared the effects of single doses of long-acting ICI 182,780 with tamoxifen or placebo on estrogen receptor (ERalpha) and progesterone receptor (PgR) content, Ki67 proliferation-associated antigen labeling index (Ki67LI), and the apoptotic index in the primary breast tumors of postmenopausal women. Previously untreated patients (stages T(1)-T(3); ER-positive or -unknown) were randomized and received a single i.m. dose of ICI 182,780 50 mg (n = 39), ICI 182,780 125 mg (n = 38), or ICI 182,780 250 mg (n = 44) or oral tamoxifen 20 mg daily (n = 36) or matching tamoxifen placebo (n = 43) for 14-21 days before tumor resection surgery with curative intent. The ER and PgR H-scores, together with the Ki67LI were determined immunohistochemically in the matched pretreatment biopsy and the posttreatment surgical specimens. The apoptotic index was determined by terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling on the same samples. The effects of treatment on each of these parameters were compared using analysis of covariance. ICI 182,780 produced dose-dependent reductions in ER and PgR H-scores and in the Ki67LI. The reductions in ER expression were statistically significant at all doses of ICI 182,780 compared with placebo (ICI 182,780 50 mg, P = 0.026; 125 mg, P = 0.006; 250 mg, P = 0.0001), and for ICI 182,780 250 mg compared with tamoxifen (P = 0.024). For PgR H-score, there were statistically significant reductions after treatment with ICI 182,780 125 mg (P = 0.003) and 250 mg (P = 0.0002) compared with placebo. In contrast, tamoxifen produced a significant increase in the PgR H-score relative to placebo, and consequently, all doses of ICI 182,780 produced PgR values that were significantly lower than those in the tamoxifen-treated group. All doses of ICI 182,780 significantly reduced Ki67LI values compared with placebo (ICI 182,780 50 mg, P = 0.046; 125 mg, P = 0.001; 250 mg, P = 0.0002), but there were no significant differences between any doses of ICI 182,780 and tamoxifen. ICI 182,780 did not alter the apoptotic index when compared with either placebo or tamoxifen. Short-term exposure to ICI 182,780 reduces the ERalpha in breast tumor cells in a dose-dependent manner by down-regulating ER protein concentration. The reductions in tumor PgR content by ICI 182,780 demonstrate that ICI 182,780, unlike tamoxifen, is devoid of estrogen-agonist activity. Reductions in tumor cell proliferative activity (as indicated by Ki67LI) show that ICI 182,780 is likely to have antitumor activity in the clinical setting.     

Changes in hormone receptors and proliferation markers in tamoxifen treated breast cancer patients and the relationship with response

Aim: To determine the effects of tamoxifen on the levels of hormone receptors and proliferation markers in the early phase of treatment and the relationship of the changes with tumor response in patients with primary breast cancer. Methods: Twenty-one women with primary, operable breast carcinomas were treated with tamoxifen 20 mg daily. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) was used to obtain samples prior to the start and at 14 days and 8-weeks post-treatment. From these samples estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), and Ki67 levels were determined using immunocytochemistry and ploidy and S-phase fraction (SPF) using flow cytometry. Tumor response was measured clinically according to UICC criteria. Results: There were 12 responders (2 CR, 10 PR) and 9 non-responders (2 NC, 7 PD). Responders were more likely to be ER + (p=0.002), PgR + (p=0.006), and low SPF (p=0.06). At 14 days post-tamoxifen, the median decrease in Ki67 (% cells staining) for responders was – 4.8 and for non-responders – 0.15 (p=0.005). This decrease was seen predominantly in ER + tumours. The difference in SPF was not significant. A decrease in ER was seen in 3/15 patients all of whom were responders. A rise in PgR was seen in 7/17 patients and all but one were responders. Similar changes for ER and PgR were seen at 8-weeks post-tamoxifen, although the reductions in Ki67 and SPF at that time point were not related to response. Conclusion: We have observed a decrease in Ki67 and ER and a rise in PgR after 14 days of treatment with tamoxifen that was related to subsequent response. This is the first study in which an early decrease in a proliferation marker has been shown to relate to subsequent clinical response.     

The combination of letrozole and trastuzumab as first or second-line biological therapy produces durable responses in a subset of HER2 positive and ER positive advanced breast cancers

Background Estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor expression occurs in ∼50% HER2 positive (HER2+) breast cancers and cross-talk between the estrogen and HER2 pathways promotes endocrine therapy resistance. The efficacy of the aromatase inhibitor letrozole in combination with trastuzumab was therefore tested in a Phase 2 study. Methods Patients with ER+ and/or PgR+ and HER2+ (IHC 2+ or 3+ or FISH+) advanced breast cancer were treated with trastuzumab plus letrozole until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results Thirty-three patients were enrolled, of which thirty one were considered evaluable. The majority of patients (82%) had received tamoxifen and 82% had HER2 FISH+ and/or IHC 3+ tumors. Eight patients responded (1 CR and 7 PR) for an overall response rate (ORR) of 26% and a clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 52%. The median time to progression (TTP) was 5.8 months and the median duration of response (DOR) was 20.6+ months. Excluding IHC 2+, FISH− tumors, the OR was 24%, CBR 44%, TTP 5.5 months and DOR 17+ months. The combination was well tolerated with only two toxicity events requiring termination of study medication. Conclusions Combined trastuzumab and letrozole treatment for patients with HER2+ and ER+ advanced breast cancer produced durable responses consistently lasting at least 1 year in one quarter of the patients. While these data are promising for a subgroup, for half the patients, trastuzumab plus letrozole was inactive. This finding demonstrates ER+ HER2+ advanced disease is heterogeneous and additional agents will be required for optimal management based on targeted therapeutics alone. Note: Aspects of this work were presented at the ASCO Annual Meeting 2005. Disclosure: Washington University conflicts of interest committee requires the following disclosures. Novartis Pharma and Genentech provided financial support for this clinical trial. Dr␣M.J. Ellis is a paid consultant for Novartis and Genentech and has also received speaking honoraria.     

Tumor biology in estrogen receptor-positive,human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-negative breast cancer: Mind the menopausal status

Breast cancer is not one disease, but can be categorized into four major molecular subtypes according to hormone receptor [estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR)] and human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) expression status. Ki67 labeling index and/or multigene assays are used to classify ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer into luminal A and luminal B (HER2-negative) subtypes. To date, most studies analyzing predictive or prognostic factors in ER-positive breast cancer have been performed in postmenopausal women, mainly using patients and samples in adjuvant aromatase inhibitor trials. In contrast, even the clinical roles of PgR and Ki67 have been little analyzed so far in premenopausal women. PgR is one of the estrogen-responsive genes, and it has been reported that plasma estradiol levels are related to expression levels of estrogen-responsive genes including PGR in ER-positive breast cancer. In this article, biological differences, especially differences in expression of PgR and Ki67 in ER-positive breast cancer between pre- and postmenopausal women are discussed. Clinical roles of PgR and Ki67 in ER-positive breast cancer differ between pre- and postmenopausal women. We suggest that the mechanisms of development and estrogen-dependent growth of ER-positive breast cancer might differ according to menopausal status.     

Marked lymphovascular invasion,progesterone receptor negativity,and high Ki67 labeling index predict poor outcome in breast cancer patients treated with endocrine therapy alone

Purpose

Whether postoperative chemotherapy should be added to endocrine therapy or not is an important issue in patients with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2-negative breast cancer. To identify patients who should be treated with additional chemotherapy, prognostic factors were investigated in breast cancer patients postoperatively treated with endocrine therapy alone.

Patients and methods

Tumor samples and clinicopathological data were collected from patients who underwent curative surgery and were postoperatively treated with endocrine therapy alone between 1999 and 2003 in three different institutes. Expression levels of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), and HER2 in primary tumors were centrally retested. Patients with ER-negative and/or HER2-positive tumors and/or with unknown nodal status were excluded from the study subjects. Immunohistochemical analysis of Ki67, HER1, insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor, and aldehyde dehydrogenase-1 was also performed. Prognostic factors were investigated by univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

A total of 261 patients were the subjects of this study. The median age was 59 years old, the mean tumor size was 1.9 cm, the node-positive rate was 20 %, and 65 % received tamoxifen alone. Distant metastases were observed in 11 patients at a median follow-up of 98 months, and four patients had died of breast cancer at a median follow-up of 99 months. Univariate analysis showed that marked lymphovascular invasion (LVI), PgR negativity, high Ki67 labeling index (LI), and high nuclear grade were significantly worse prognostic factors for distant metastasis. Multivariate analysis revealed that marked LVI [hazard ratio (HR) 21.8] and PgR negativity (HR 10.3) were independently worse prognostic factors for distant metastasis, respectively. Multivariate analysis also revealed that marked LVI (HR 287.3), PgR negativity (HR 25.1), and high Ki67 LI (HR 19.6) were independently worse prognostic factors for breast cancer-specific death, respectively.

Conclusions

The results of this multi-institute cohort study indicated that endocrine therapy alone could not prevent distant metastasis in breast cancer patients with PgR-negative tumors and/or with tumors showing marked LVI or high cell proliferation. These patients may need postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in addition to endocrine therapy.     

Biologic markers as predictors of clinical outcome from systemic therapy for primary operable breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine whether pretreatment clinical features and molecular markers, together with changes in these factors, can predict treatment response and survival in patients with primary operable breast cancer who receive neoadjuvant therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Mitoxantrone, methotrexate (with or without mitomycin), and tamoxifen chemoendocrine therapy was administered to 158 patients before surgery. Clinical response was assessed after four cycles of treatment. Fine-needle aspiration cytology for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), c-erbB-2, p53, bcl-2, Ki67, S-phase fraction (SPF), and ploidy were performed pretreatment and repeated on day 10 or day 21 after the first cycle of treatment. RESULTS: Good clinical response (GCR, defined as complete response or minimal residual disease) was achieved in 31% of patients (49 of 158). Tumor size, nodal disease, response, ER, PgR, c-erbB-2, p53, bcl-2, Ki67, SPF, and ploidy were analyzed as predictors of survival. By univariate analysis, node-positive disease (P =.05), lack of ER (P <.05) and PgR (P <.05), and failure to attain GCR (P =.008) were associated with a significantly increased risk of relapse. A significantly increased risk of death was associated with node-positive disease (P =.02), lack of ER expression (P =.04), and failure to attain GCR. By multivariate analysis, GCR was an independent predictor for survival (P =.05). ER expression (P =.03), absence of c-erbB-2 (P =.03), and a decrease in Ki67 on day 10 or day 21 of the first cycle (P <.05) significantly predicted for subsequent GCR. CONCLUSION: Molecular markers may be used to predict the likelihood of achieving GCR, which seems to be a valid surrogate marker for survival.     

Breast cancer subtype approximations and loco-regional recurrence after immediate breast reconstruction

Background

A small but significant proportion of patients with breast cancer (BC) will develop loco-regional recurrence (LRR) after immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). The LRR also varies according to breast cancer subtypes and clinicopathological features.

Methods

We studied 1742 consecutive BC patients with IBR between 1997 and 2006. According to St Gallen conference consensus 2011, its BC approximations were applied to classify BC into five subtypes: estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PgR) positive, HER2 negative, and low Ki67 (<14%) [luminal A]; ER and/or PgR positive, HER2 negative and high Ki67(≥14%) [luminal B/HER2 negative]; ER and/or PgR positive, any Ki67 and HER2 positive [luminal B/HER2 positive]; ER negative, PgR negative and HER2 positive [HER2 positive/nonluminal]; and ER negative, PgR negative and HER2 negative [triple negative]. Cumulative incidences of LRR were compared across different subgroups by means of the Gray test. Multivariable Cox regression models were applied.

Results

Median follow up time was 74 months (range 3–165). The cumulative incidence of LRR was 5.5% (121 events). The 5-year cumulative incidence of LRR was 2.5% for luminal A; 5.0% for luminal B/HER2 negative; 9.8% for luminal B/HER2 positive; 3.8% for HER2 non luminal; and 10.9% for triple negative. On multivariable analysis, tumor size (pT) >2 cm, body mass index (BMI) ≥25, triple negative and luminal B/HER2 positive subtypes were associated with increased risk of LRR.

Conclusion

Luminal B/HER2 positive, triple negative subtypes and BMI ≥25 are independent prognostic factors for risk of LRR after IBR.     

Comparison of the results of immunocytochemical assays for biologic variables on preoperative fine-needle aspirates and on surgical specimens of primary breast carcinomas

BACKGROUND: Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is a well-documented procedure for the diagnosis and biologic characterization of breast carcinoma. In order to compare the immunocytochemical expression of biologic parameters on cytology and on histology, estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) status, p53 protein expression, and Ki67 growth fraction were evaluated on presurgical fine-needle aspirates (FNAs) from breast carcinoma patients and on the corresponding surgical samples prior to any systemic therapy. METHODS: FNAs were performed on 104 patients with primary breast carcinoma at the time of diagnosis and subjected to immunocytochemical evaluation of ER, PgR, p53, and Ki67. The same parameters were immunohistochemically evaluated on the corresponding paraffin embedded sections. RESULTS: ER, PgR, p53, and Ki67 were evaluable on FNAs and on paired tissue sections in 100, 97, 68, and 84 cases, respectively. Concordance between cytology and histology was 89% for ER, 78% for PgR, 79% for p53, and 70% for Ki67. CONCLUSIONS: The concordance between the results of immunocytochemical evaluation of ER, PgR, p53, and Ki67, on both cytology and histology, underscores the reliability of the biologic characterization of breast carcinoma by FNAB. This approach could be particularly useful in predicting prognosis and response to treatment in patients who are candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or endocrine therapy.