Percutaneous tracheostomy: one center’s experience with a new modality

Background

A retrospective review of our experience with percutaneous tracheostomy was performed to determine our complication rate and pattern of use since this modality was introduced at our institution.

Methods

A retrospective chart review captured all patients in whom tracheostomy was performed or supervised by a trauma/critical care faculty member. Dates of hospital admission, ICU admission, intubation, discontinuation of mechanical ventilation, type and location of procedure, procedural complications, Injury Severity Score, charges, and patient demographics were collected. Percutaneous tracheostomy (PT) and open tracheostomy (OT) experiences were compared.

Results

Three hundred sixty-eight tracheostomies were performed (190 OT and 178 PT). The average time to tracheostomy (TTT) for PT patients decreased from 12.7 to 7.4 days. The average TTT for OT patients remained stable at 14.0 days. The complication rate was 3.5%, with 4 complications (1.5%) associated with OT and 9 complications (5.1%) associated with PT. All complications in the PT group occurred before using a single dilator system. The 9 complications in the PT group occurred among 5 surgeons, all before their 11th attempt. PT saves $444 in charges per procedure.

Conclusion

OT continues to be a safe method of performing tracheostomies. PT has a steep learning curve but can be mastered quickly. Benefits include a shorter time to tracheostomy, elimination of patient transport, and saving in charges. Initial PT attempts should be supervised by an experienced surgeon.     

Comparison of safety and cost of percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy

Tracheostomy continues to be a standard procedure for the management of long-term ventilator-dependent patients. Traditionally the procedure has been performed by surgeons in the operating theater using an open technique. This routine practice has recently been challenged by the introduction of bedside percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT), which has been reported to be a cost-effective alternative. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the safety, procedure time, cost, and utilization of percutaneous and surgical tracheostomies at a university hospital. A retrospective medical chart review was performed on all ventilator-dependent intensive care unit patients at the University of Virginia Medical Center undergoing tracheostomy during a 23-month period beginning December 26, 1996. Of the 213 patients identified for review, 74 and 139 patients received percutaneous and surgical tracheostomies, respectively. Of 74 percutaneous tracheostomies, 73 reviewed were performed by general surgeons, pulmonary physicians, or anesthesiologists in the intensive care unit; all open tracheostomies were performed by surgeons in the operating room, and one percutaneous procedure was performed in the operating room. Perioperative complications occurred in five of 74 patients (6.76%) during PDT; of these, three patients (4.1%) experienced major complications requiring emergent operative exploration of the neck. Three patients (2.2%) experienced perioperative complications during surgical tracheostomy. The mean procedure time was significantly shorter for the percutaneous procedure. Average charges per patient in an uncomplicated case including professional fees, inventory, bronchoscopy (if performed), and operating room charges were $1753.01 and $2604.00 for percutaneous and standard tracheostomies, respectively. These charges do not include the charges associated with surgical intervention after PDT complications. In contrast to previously published reports showing complications clustered during a physician's first 30 percutaneous cases, our study demonstrated no relationship between complication occurrence and physician experience. That is, no learning curve associated with performing PDT was evident. In addition there was no association seen between physician specialty and complication rate. PDT in the intensive care unit costs less than surgical tracheostomy performed in the operating room and can be performed in less time. Several other studies have recommended that bronchoscopy during PDT provides additional safety; however, in our series all three major complications took place during bronchoscopy-assisted percutaneous procedures. Our series suggests that PDT carries an appreciable risk of major complications. Careful patient selection and additional experience with the procedure may decrease complication rates to an acceptable level.     

Tracheostomy: How and When Should It Be Done in Cardiovascular Surgery ICU?

Abstract   Background: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of timing and techniques of tracheostomy on mortality and morbidity in cardiovascular surgery patients. Methods: Between January 2000 and October 2007, a total of 19,559 cardiac and vascular operations were performed in our hospital, and 205 of these patients (1.04%) who underwent a tracheostomy procedure were included in this retrospective study. Results: Surgical tracheostomy (ST) was employed in 134 (65.4%) and percutaneous tracheostomy (PT) in 71 (34.6%) of the cases. There were 17 complications related to all tracheostomy procedures in 15 (7.3%) patients. Bleeding, requiring surgical intervention, occurred in five (3.7%) ST patients and in one (1.4%) PT patient. Cardiac arrest related to the procedure occurred in two (1.5%) ST patients. Pneumothorax occurred in three (2.2%) ST patients and in one (1.4%) PT patient, subcutaneous emphysema in three (2.2%) ST patients and in one (1.4%) PT patient, and tracheoesophageal fistula in one (0.7%) ST patient (p > 0.05). The postoperative infection rate was significantly lower, and cooperation of the patients, postoperative patient mobilization, and oral feeding rates were higher in the early tracheostomy group. The multifactorial mortality rates of early (相似文献   

Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy is as safe as open tracheostomy

Although percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) has been advocated as an alternative to open tracheostomy (OT) its relative safety has been questioned repeatedly. This study prospectively compared the safety and complications of PDT and OT. Ninety-four patients underwent PDT and 252 patients underwent OT at this institution from December 1998 through April 2000 with the choice of procedure left to the operator. OT was performed in the operating room whereas PDT was performed in intensive care units (ICUs). PDT was performed by surgeons and medical intensivists under a strict institutional policy and procedure governing patient selection and conduct of the procedure. Complications were defined as bleeding, loss of airway, hypotension, hypoxia, tracheostomy tube malposition, subcutaneous emphysema, infection, and conversion of PDT to OT. All patients survived the operation. PDT and OT had similar complication rates: 2.1 per cent for PDT versus 2.8 per cent for OT (P = not significant). Postoperative bleeding, which was the most frequent complication, occurred in one PDT patient and four OT patients. One PDT patient required conversion to OT as a result of extensive tracheal fibrosis. Subcutaneous emphysema, soft-tissue infection, and a malpositioned tracheostomy tube were the remaining complications in the OT patients. We conclude that the complication rates of PDT and OT are comparable. The choice of PDT or OT should be dictated by the surgeon's training and experience, the patient's condition, neck anatomy, and stability for transfer to the operating room.     

Percutaneous tracheostomy: a safe procedure in the morbidly obese

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy (PDT) is becoming a widely accepted technique that has replaced open tracheostomy (OT) in many hospitals. One of the remaining relative contraindications is morbid obesity. There are no published case series of its use in this patient population. We reviewed our experience with PDT in the morbidly obese and compared it to OT in this patient population. Our hypothesis is that PDT and OT have a similar frequency of adverse events. STUDY DESIGN: We reviewed charts of all morbidly obese patients (body mass index [BMI]>or=35, calculated as kg/m2) undergoing either PDT or OT at our institution during a 58-month period. Variables examined included age, gender, BMI, diagnosis, bedside or operating room, and bronchoscopy-assisted. We recorded all procedural complications and all tracheostomy-related complications that occurred for 30 days postprocedure or death. Primary adverse end points were defined as procedures that started percutaneous and converted to open; any reoperation related to the initial tracheostomy; malpositioning of tracheostomy resulting in patient morbidity, loss of airway control, and bleeding requiring surgical intervention. Secondary adverse end points occurred when a tracheostomy tube was dislodged or malfunctioned, as in the case of a cuff leak, and any bleeding that occurred more than 24 hours after insertion. RESULTS: From January 1, 2000, until September 30, 2004, our institution performed 1,062 tracheostomies. One hundred forty-three patients had a BMI>or=35. Eighty-nine patients underwent PDT and 53 patients underwent OT. Sixty-seven of the PDTs were performed at the bedside and 22 were performed in the operating room. All OTs were performed in the operating room. Five (6.5%) primary end points were recorded for PDTs (4 conversions to open, 1 malpositioning). Three (6.5%) primary end points were reported for OTs (malpositioning resulting in hypoxia, bleeding requiring surgical intervention, aborted attempt at open). CONCLUSIONS: PDT is a safe procedure to perform on morbidly obese patients.     

Edema volume, not timing, is the key to success in lymphedema treatment

BACKGROUND: Prospective evaluation of the percutaneous tracheostomy by the guide wire dilating forceps (GWDF) technique. METHODS: In 50 selected patients percutaneous tracheostomy with fiberscopic control was performed and evaluated. RESULTS: Most percutaneous tracheostomies were performed without any adverse effect. No life-threatening complications or deaths were related to the procedure. The procedure was successful in 49 of 50 patients (98%). In 1 patient the procedure was converted to an open tracheostomy because significant bleeding occurred. Five perioperative complications, including this significant bleeding and four minor complications, occurred in 50 patients (10%). Early complications occurred in 6 of 48 patients (13%), including one significant bleeding and five minor complications. A subglottic stenosis occurred in 2 of 36 successfully decannulated patients (6%). In one case this was certainly due to prolonged endotracheal intubation. CONCLUSIONS: The GWDF technique is a safe and efficient bedside alternative to open tracheostomy. Fiberscopic control is recommended to increase the safety of the procedure. Although studies of late complications are necessary, it appears to be justifiable to consider percutaneous tracheostomy for patients who require tracheostomy.     

Routine chest X-ray after percutaneous tracheostomy is unnecessary

Percutaneous tracheostomy (PT) is an increasingly common procedure in the management of critically ill patients. Current practice for both open and percutaneous tracheostomies is a post-procedure chest X-ray to rule out potentially life-threatening complications such as a pneumothorax or tube malposition. Our study evaluated the utility of chest X-ray after PT. A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients undergoing PT at Kern Medical Center between January 1999 and December 2003. Charts were reviewed for age, sex, and clinical outcome as well as the radiologist's interpretation of the postprocedure chest X-ray. A total of 73 procedures were completed in 47 men and 26 women. The majority of the tracheostomies were in trauma patients who needed prolonged ventilatory support. There were no complications identified on postprocedure chest X-ray. A single patient was converted to an open procedure secondary to bleeding. We conclude that routine chest X-ray after PT is unnecessary.     

An analysis of time and staff utilization for open versus percutaneous tracheostomies.

OBJECTIVE: We examined staff utilization and procedure length for percutaneous and open bedside tracheostomies in an intensive care setting. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical outcomes study. METHODS: Intensive care unit (ICU) tracheostomy consults meeting criteria for bedside procedures were randomized to open or percutaneous procedures. The Cook percutaneous kit and a prepackaged tracheostomy tray were used. ICU nursing and respiratory therapy staff was present for all procedures. The total resident time, staff time, and procedure length were recorded. Twelve patients underwent percutaneous tracheostomy, and 12 received an open tracheostomy. RESULTS: An operating room nurse was present for 7 of the open procedures. Ancillary medical staff was present for 3 open tracheostomies: anesthesia for 2 and critical care for 1. Ancillary medical staff was present for 4 percutaneous tracheostomies: anesthesia staff for 1 and critical care for 3. The average resident presence, staff presence, and procedure length for open tracheostomies were 47, 30, and 12 minutes, respectively. For percutaneous tracheostomies, the times were 39, 29, and 12 minutes, respectively. One intraoperative complication occurred during a percutaneous procedure and 2 perioperative complications occurred: 1 in the open group and 1 in the percutaneous group. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in procedure length, resident time, or staff time between the 2 procedures. Ancillary staff was occasionally used but was not thought to be necessary for the majority of procedures. Both procedures can be safely and expediently performed in the ICU.     

Locally developed guidelines reduce immediate complications from percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy using the Ciaglia Blue Rhino technique: a report on 200 procedures

Ciaglia Blue Rhino percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy is used as an aid to ventilatory weaning. It carries an immediate complication rate previously reported in 100 consecutive patients by Fikkers et al at 6% for "major" complications and 30% for "minor" complications. Mortality has been associated with the procedure. Our institution has performed dilatational percutaneous tracheostomy since 1998 and used the Blue Rhino technique since 2002. Consensus guidelines were developed following initial experiences. They focus on preoperative risk assessment including levels of ventilatory support and anatomical considerations, seniority of staff use of bronchoscopy and capnography and correction of coagulopathies. Following introduction of the guidelines we conducted an audit of the first 200 Ciaglia Blue Rhino tracheostomies performed. There was an immediate major complication rate of 3% and minor complication rate of 18%. No deaths occurred within 24 hours of the procedure. We conclude that applying our consensus guidelines produced an immediate complication rate for Ciaglia Blue Rhino percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy below published audits.     

Percutaneous tracheostomy with the guide wire dilating forceps technique: presentation of 171 consecutive patients

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of percutaneous tracheostomy (PT) with the guide wire dilating forceps (GWDF) technique. METHODS: Prospective study of perioperative complications, retrospective analysis of early and late complications in an ICU in a teaching university hospital. RESULTS: The success rate of the procedure was 96.5%. The average procedure time in 171 consecutive patients was 5.0 min. Perioperative complications requiring surgical or medical intervention occurred in 6.4% of 171 patients. This included conversion to surgical tracheostomy, which was necessary in six patients (3.5%). Major complications while being cannulated occurred in 2.4% of 164 patients but seemed mostly unrelated with the GWDF technique itself. Late complications (after decannulation) were mostly minor and occurred in 22.6% of 106 patients. Only one patient (0.9%) had a symptomatic tracheal stenosis developed. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous tracheostomy with the guide wire dilating forceps technique is easy to perform at the bedside with few late complications. However, in our study, perioperative and immediate postoperative bleeding complications (minor and major) occur quite often.     

Cricoid Palpability as a Selection Criterion for Bedside Tracheostomy

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the significance of cricoid cartilage palpability as a selection criterion for bedside tracheostomy and to prospectively compare a cohort of patients undergoing bedside tracheostomy with another cohort receiving operating room tracheostomy. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Prospective trial comparing 2 cohorts of patients receiving tracheostomies at a tertiary care center (university hospital). In all, 220 consecutive intubated patients selected for elective tracheostomy were enrolled. Of them, 134 patients had palpable cricoid cartilage and underwent open surgical tracheostomy at the bedside. The remaining 68 patients received open surgical tracheostomies in the operating room. Demographic data, patient anatomic features, and perioperative complications were prospectively recorded. There were no statistically significant differences in age, gender, reason for admission, indication for tracheostomy, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, number of days intubated, or time required to perform the procedure for those patients whose tracheostomies were performed in the operating room versus the intensive care unit. RESULTS: Patients with a palpable cricoid cartilage had a significantly reduced perioperative complication rate compared with those without a palpable cricoid cartilage (2% vs 22%, P < 0.001). Comparison of cervical girth, mental-to-sternum distance, and thyroid-notch-to-sternum distance showed no significant difference between the 2 groups and did not further define selection criteria. CONCLUSION: This investigation prospectively confirms the safety of bedside tracheostomy placement in properly selected patients. Complication incidences are defined for open surgical tracheostomy at the bedside and in the operating room. Palpability of the cricoid cartilage has significant value as a selection criterion for bedside tracheostomy. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings will aid in the development of protocols and pathways for surgical airway management in critically ill patients to maximize cost-effective, high-quality care.     

Comparison of open, percutaneous, and translaryngeal tracheostomies.

INTRODUCTION: With 3 tracheostomy techniques currently available, controversy exists regarding which is safest and most economical. Percutaneous (PDT) and the new translaryngeal (TLT) tracheostomies are cited as more cost-effective than the traditional open surgical procedure because they are bedside techniques. Our objective was to compare the perioperative and postoperative complications of the 3 techniques.Study Design: This was a prospective trial involving 100 consecutive patients who underwent tracheostomy between April and December of 1997 at the London Health Sciences Centre and St Joseph's Health Centre in London, Canada. RESULTS: Fifty open tracheostomies were performed. Indications included prolonged ventilation (n = 42), airway protection (n = 5), pulmonary hygiene (n = 2), and sleep apnea (n = 1). A tension pneumothorax was the one significant intraoperative complication. Fifteen postoperative complications occurred, most notable of which was a 2-L hemorrhage at 24 hours. Thirty-seven TLTs were performed, 20 in patients with coagulopathy. Indications were prolonged intubation (n = 27), airway protection (n = 9), and pulmonary hygiene (n = 1). One intraoperative complication of accidental decannulation occurred. One postoperative complication, a pretracheal abscess, occurred in a decannulated transplant patient 2 weeks after the procedure. Thirteen PDTs were performed. Indications were prolonged intubation (n = 6), airway protection (n = 6), and tracheal toilet (n = 1). No significant complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: TLT and PDT have fewer complications than the traditional open technique. TLT appears to have the greatest utility in the coagulopathic patient.     

Open versus percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: efficacy and cost analysis

The economic advantages of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomies versus open tracheostomies in the operating room have been thoroughly evaluated. We are now reporting our comparison of the costs and charges of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomies with those of open bedside tracheostomies at our institution. The current literature comparing the two open techniques and the percutaneous method of placing tracheostomies was reviewed and the charges and costs for these procedures at our institution were compared. Patients were placed into one of three groups for analysis: open tracheostomies in the operating room (Group I), open tracheostomies in the intensive care unit (Group II), and percutaneous dilatational tracheostomies in the intensive care unit (Group III). Based on our own experience and a literature review it is evident that all three approaches to tracheostomies are safe. Economic analysis showed a savings of $180 in cost per procedure and a $658 savings in charges per procedure for the open method at the bedside when compared with the percutaneous method at the bedside. The professional fee for bronchoscopy was not included in this calculation; including this would lead to greater savings with the open method over the percutaneous method. Open tracheostomy in the operating room increased costs over the bedside procedure by $2194 and increased charges by $2871. For the 150 to 180 tracheostomies done each year at our institution utilization of the open technique at the bedside results in a cost savings of approximately $31,500 and a charge savings of $109,000 compared with the percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. Both the open bedside and percutaneous dilatational methods are reasonable and safe options. However, the open bedside tracheostomy is a better utilization of resources and is more cost effective, and it is the procedure of choice at our institution.     

Percutaneous tracheostomy with the Blue Rhino trade mark technique: presentation of 100 consecutive patients

We assessed the peri-operative, early and late complications in 100 percutaneous tracheostomies performed with the Blue Rhino trade mark kit. The success rate was 98%. Peri-operative complications occurred in 30 patients. Six major complications occurred; these included bleeding which required surgical exploration (n = 3), and pneumothoraces (n = 2) and one false passage. Cannula insertion was made easier by blunt dissection of the cervical tissues anterior to the trachea. The median duration of the procedure was 8.5 min, which is significantly longer than other authors' results. Only one major complication occurred while the patient was cannulated (serious bleeding requiring exploration). Finally, in a single patient a tracheal stenosis occurred as a major late complication which eventually was treated by a successful tracheal resection. Percutaneous tracheostomy with the Blue Rhino trade mark kit is safe with a low incidence of major complications.     

Tracheostomy in cardiosurgical patients: surgical tracheostomy versus ciaglia and fantoni methods.

BACKGROUND: Patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation are not uncommon in a cardiosurgical intensive care unit. Elective tracheostomy is considered the airway treatment of choice in these patients. METHODS: To evaluate different techniques for tracheostomy, we prospectively investigated 120 patients who had conventional open (n = 40), minimally invasive percutaneous dilatational (n = 40), or translaryngeal (n = 40) tracheostomy techniques. The main areas of investigation included oxygenation index (partial pressure of arterial oxygen divided by fraction of inspired oxygen), complications, infection, and cost. RESULTS: The oxygenation index decreased in almost every patient, regardless of the technique used, but the extent of decrease was significantly lower in both minimally invasive techniques compared with the conventional method. Overall complication rate was 12.5% both in open tracheostomy and in percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy, whereas no complications occurred in translaryngeal tracheostomy procedures. Bacterial contamination of the tracheostomy site was found in 35% of the open tracheostomies, whereas no infection was seen in percutaneous dilatational or translaryngeal tracheostomies. In terms of costs, PDT ($506) and TLT ($362) were both much cheaper than open tracheostomy ($699). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous dilatational and translaryngeal tracheostomies are safe and cost-effective procedures that can be done easily at the patient's bedside and thus are attractive alternatives to conventional surgical tracheostomy in long-term airway access in a cardiosurgical intensive care unit.     

A survey of tracheostomy practice in a cardiothoracic intensive care unit

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess current practice of performing tracheostomies in critically ill cardiac surgical patients, to establish complication rates, and to identify areas of this clinical practice that could be improved. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: A cardiothoracic intensive care unit in a teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The most recent series of 100 tracheostomies performed in patients admitted to the intensive care unit. INTERVENTIONS: Percutaneous or surgical tracheostomy for respiratory management. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 95 patients had 1 tracheostomy performed. One patient had a tracheostomy performed twice, and 1 patient had a tracheostomy performed 3 times; these repetitions were caused by recurrent respiratory failure. The median time from tracheal intubation to tracheostomy was 5 days (range, 1-23 days; interquartile range, 4-8 days), and median period between insertion and decannulation was 20 days (range, 2-77 days; interquartile range, 12-25 days). The most common reason for insertion was an anticipated long weaning time (55%) followed by insertion after failed extubation (32%). The Ciaglia percutaneous dilational technique was used for 89% of tracheostomies, whereas surgical techniques were used for 8%. The most common complication was either complete or partial obstruction of the tracheostomy tube (24%) followed by infection of the tracheostomy site in 18% (17/94) and bleeding at the time of insertion (11%). CONCLUSION: The percutaneous dilational technique of tracheostomy was used predominantly in this unit. The median time from tracheal intubation to tracheostomy was 5 days. The most common complications were bleeding at the time of insertion, obstruction of the tracheostomy tube, and stomal infection.     

A comparison of percutaneous and operative tracheostomies in intensive care patients

The aim of our study was to compare the complication rate of convenional surgical and percutaneous dilational tracheostomies performed under general anaesthesia in critically ill patients. Fifty-three consecutive patients whose lungs were mechanically ventilated and who required tracheostomy were randomised to undergo either conventional surgical tracheostomy (n = 28) in the operating room or percutaneous dilational tracheostomy (n = 25) in the intensive care unit under general anaesthesia. All of the procedures were successfully completed. No deaths were related to the performance of either tracheostomy technique. Three patients in each group required a dressing change for minor bleeding at the tracheostomy site. There was no major bleeding requiring blood transfusion. One patient in each group developed atelectasis detected on chest x-ray postoperatively. In the surgical tracheostomy group, there were two patients with cuff leaks, one with a stomal infection and one with a pneumothorax. None of these complications occurred after percutaneous, dilational tracheostomy. We conclude that the low incidence of complications in both groups indicates that percutaneous dilational tracheostomy can be performed as safely in the intensive care unit with general anaesthesia as surgical tracheostomy can be performed in the operating room.     

The use of the laryngeal mask airway during guidewire dilating forceps tracheostomy

Percutaneous tracheostomy has become a common alternative to the classical open tracheostomy because of its convenience, cost effectiveness, and decreased complication rates. We retrospectively reviewed our intensive care practice using a guidewire dilatating forceps percutaneous tracheostomy technique with an endotracheal tube, as compared with the Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) for these procedures. From 1998 to 2004, 274 patients underwent a tracheostomy procedure. Two-hundred-fifty-four (92.7%) of these patients underwent a guidewire dilatating forceps tracheostomy and 20 (7.3%) underwent a surgical tracheostomy. In the guidewire dilatating forceps group, 188 (74%) were performed by endoscopy via LMA-guided bronchoscopy, and 66 (26%) were performed through an endotracheal tube. Endoscopic views obtained via the LMA were subjectively better than those obtained with the endotracheal tube. Acute complications were significantly more frequent when using an endotracheal tube as compared with the LMA (6 of 66 versus 4 of 188; P = 0.022 Fisher's exact test, odds ratio = 4.6). There was a significant difference in terms of acute (10 of 254 versus 6 of 20; P < 0.001, odds ratio = 10.5) and chronic (0 of 254 versus 4 of 20; P < 0.001) complications between the 2 groups. There were no ventilatory complications or reports of gastric aspiration. The LMA provides a safe and effective alternative to an endotracheal tube for airway management during guidewire dilatating forceps tracheostomies in selected patients.     

PercuTwist-Dilatationstracheotomie

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy (PDT) is considered to be an accepted method in intensive care patients. In 2002 Frova and Quintel described a method of dilation that employed controlled rotation of the PercuTwist dilational device. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the new technique employed by an experienced team. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective, observational clinical study in 54 intensive care patients who required PDT. All tracheostomies were accompanied by bronchoscopic control. Vital parameters and perioperative complications were registered. RESULTS: In all 54 consecutive PercuTwist tracheostomies no severe complications were noted. Accidental tracheal ring fracture was noted in 7 patients while bleeding that needed surgical care occurred in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: The PercuTwist tracheostomy is a safe procedure for intensive care patients. More prospective studies that would compare the PercuTwist tracheostomy with the other PDT methods are necessary.     

Appraisal of percutaneous tracheostomy.

Two commercially available kits have been used to create 25 percutaneous tracheostomies, 20 using the Cook system and five using the Rapitrac system. The operation time and complication rates of these tracheostomies have been compared with those for 16 conventional tracheostomies performed for similar indications. Median operating times were 60 (range 30-105) min for conventional tracheostomy, 15 (range 8-70) min for Cook and 5 (range 3-15) min for Rapitrac systems (P less than 0.001). A significantly higher proportion of patients in the Rapitrac group had complications compared with the other two groups (P less than 0.05). The complication rate for the Cook group compared favourably with that for the conventional tracheostomy group. The Cook system of percutaneous tracheostomy is a simple, rapid and safe alternative to conventional tracheostomy.