Randomized comparison of cyclophosphamide, imidazole carboxamide, and adriamycin versus cyclophosphamide and adriamycin in patients with advanced stage malignant mesothelioma: a Sarcoma Intergroup Study

In 1980, a consensus chemotherapy intergroup study for advanced malignant mesothelioma was initiated based on a collaborative agreement among the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG), the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG), and the Southeastern Cancer Study Group (SECSG). The purpose of the study was to evaluate cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2 day 1), imidazole carboxamide (250 mg/m2 days 1 through 5), and doxorubicin (Adriamycin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH) (50 mg/m2 day 1) v cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2) and doxorubicin (50 mg/m2) in a randomized prospective clinical trial involving 76 fully evaluable patients with advanced stages II to IV malignant mesothelioma. A total of nine responses (12%) were documented, including three complete and six partial responses. There was no significant difference in response duration or survival between treatment arms. Leukopenia (greater than 2,000/microL) was observed in 46% of patients treated with the three-drug combination and 38% of patients receiving the two-drug combination. The variables of performance status 0-1 and the absence of prior chemotherapy/radiotherapy were significant with respect to favorable impact on survival. We conclude, based on the minimal benefit observed, that the combination of cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin with or without imidazole carboxamide does not warrant further investigation in patients with advanced-stage malignant mesothelioma.     

Vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide versus low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil in advanced breast cancer: a randomized trial of the Piedmont Oncology Association

Eighty-one evaluable patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive either vincristine 1 mg/m2, doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 on day one and cyclophosphamide 200 mg/m2 orally days 3-6 (VAC); or cyclophosphamide 350 mg/m2, methotrexate 20 mg/m2, and 5-fluorouracil 350 mg/m2 (CMF) intravenously, all on day 1. Courses of each of the above regimens were repeated every three weeks. Twenty-one of 45 patients (47%) on VAC and seven of 44 patients (16%) on CMF had complete or partial response (P less than 0.05). The duration of response was six months for CMF and nine months for VAC. Hematologic toxicity was minimal for both groups but three patients receiving VAC developed cardiac toxicity. Overall survival projections at this time indicate no differences between the VAC or CMF treated patients.     

Alternating weekly doxorubicin and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin followed by weekly doxorubicin and daily cyclophosphamide in stage IV breast cancer. A Southwest Oncology Group study

Twenty-seven women with metastatic breast cancer were treated with doxorubicin (Adriamycin, Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH) every other week, alternating with 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and high-dose calcium leucovorin, for a 12-week induction regimen, followed by weekly doxorubicin and oral daily cyclophosphamide. Twenty-five women were eligible and evaluable. Of these, complete response occurred in two patients (8%) and partial response in six patients (24%), for a total response rate of 32%. Toxicity was similar to that seen in previous Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) trials in this patient population. Response rates in this study were inferior, with comparable median survivals to those of previous SWOG studies that are reviewed. Additional, more dose-intensive approaches incorporating newer approaches to the administration of cancer chemotherapeutic agents are planned.     

A pilot study of three sequential chemotherapeutic regimens in metastatic breast cancer

The aim of this pilot study was to estimate the toxicity and response rate of an alternating chemotherapeutic program in chemotherapy-naive metastatic breast cancer patients. Treatment consisted of regimen A (given days 1-28): cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 PO days 1-14, doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8, and 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8 (CAF regimen); regimen B (given days 29-56): dibromodulcitol 135 mg/m2 p.o. days 30-39, mitoxantrone 9 mg/m2 i.v. day 29, and vincristine 1.2 mg/m2 i.v. (maximum 2.0 mg) day 29 (DMV regimen); and regimen C (given days 57-84): thiotepa 12 mg/m2, doxorubicin 45 mg/m2 and vinblastine 4.5 mg/m2 all i.v. on day 57. There were 27 eligible patients with a median age of 51 years (range 34-78). On 14 episodes the leukocyte count fell to less than 1 X 10(9)/L during the first six cycles of treatment (14% of 99 cycles). There were no treatment-related deaths. Common non-life-threatening toxicities included thrombocytopenia, anemia, vomiting, and alopecia. Despite having no drugs in common, the leukocyte and platelet nadirs after CAF correlated with the nadir counts after DMV (r values of 0.6829 and 0.5892, respectively; p = 0.01). Among the 23 patients with measurable and/or evaluable disease there were five complete responses (22%) and nine partial responses (39%), with a median time to treatment failure of 29 weeks. The overall median survival was 19 months.     

Short-term chemotherapy of poor-prognosis metastatic breast cancer with three non-cross resistant chemotherapy regimens. A Southwest Oncology Group Study

A Southwest Oncology Group pilot study was designed to evaluate a brief, 4.5-month induction course of chemotherapy with three presumably non-cross resistant regimens in poor-prognosis metastatic breast cancer. Sixty-three patients were treated with doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, plus vincristine on day 1, methotrexate followed 30 minutes later by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) on day 22, and mitomycin C plus 3 days of vinblastine on day 43. All three sequential regimens were repeated once and therapy was then discontinued in responding patients. The same chemotherapy was reinstituted at the time of relapse. The overall response rate to the induction chemotherapy was 35% and included only one complete response (2%). Median response duration was 9 months. Respondents were off all therapy for a median of 5 months (range, 1-12+ months) and were followed without evidence of progressive disease. Response to retreatment was 30% with no complete responses seen. Overall median survival from the data of diagnosis of metastatic disease was 24 months, with a median survival of 14 months from the date of initiation of therapy. Toxicity for this induction regimen was moderate with two treatment-related deaths secondary to myelosuppression. While the results of this pilot study fail to support the use of non-cross resistant regimens in breast cancer, short-term therapy appears to have no adverse effect on survival and resulted in significant periods during which no therapy was given, resulting in a reduction in overall toxicity.     

Low-dose mitomycin and weekly low-dose doxorubicin combination chemotherapy for patients with metastatic breast carcinoma previously treated with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil

Forty-four evaluable patients with breast carcinoma previously treated with combination chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) were treated with a combination chemotherapy regimen consisting of doxorubicin (A) (20 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, and 22, repeated every 28 days) and mitomycin (MIT) (10 mg/m2 on day 1, repeated every 28 days). Five patients (11%) achieved a complete remission (CR) and 14 patients (32%) had a partial response (PR). The median duration of survival was 11.5 months and the median duration of response was 8 months for responders (CR and PR). Toxicity was moderate and consisted of neutropenia (74%), thrombocytopenia (25%), pneumonitis (11%), and cardiomyopathy (2%). The combination chemotherapy regimen A and MIT is an effective regimen for treating previously treated with CMF.     

A phase II trial of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, and prednisolone rapidly alternating with doxorubicin and vincristine (CMFP/AV) in advanced breast cancer.

Sixty-seven patients with advanced breast cancer were prospectively entered into a Phase II trial of cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 orally on days 1-14, methotrexate 40 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) on day 1, 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, and prednisolone 40 mg/m2 orally on days 1-14 (CMFP) rapidly alternating with doxorubicin 25-30 mg/m2 i.v. on day 8 and vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 i.v. on day 8 (AV). Complete responses (CR) were seen in 7 patients, partial responses (PR) in 25 (CR + PR, 48%), stable disease in 24, and progressive disease in 9. The median time to disease progression was 9.8 months, and the median survival 19.4 months. Neutropenia was the major toxicity with WHO grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in 50% of patients. CMFP/AV is a well-tolerated, effective regimen in advanced breast cancer but does not appear to be superior to CMFP alone.     

Chemotherapy for advanced thymic carcinoma: clinical response to cisplatin,doxorubicin, vincristine,and cyclophosphamide (ADOC chemotherapy)

The role of systemic chemotherapy and optimal regimen in thymic carcinoma remains uncertain. We evaluated the clinical responsiveness of ADOC (cisplatin, doxorubicin, vincristine, and cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy for advanced thymic carcinoma that have distant metastatic or unresectable lesions. From 1996 to 2000, we treated eight cases of thymic carcinoma. According to the classification by Masaoka et al., the clinical stage in one case was IVa, whereas the others were IVb. Histologic subtypes were as follows: four cases were squamous cell carcinoma, two cases were undifferentiated, and two were small-cell carcinoma. All patients received 50 mg/m2 of cisplatin and 40 mg/m2 of doxorubicin intravenously on day 1, 0.6 mg/m2 of vincristine intravenously on day 3, and 700 mg/m2 of cyclophosphamide intravenously on day 4, ADOC regimen, respectively, at 3- to 4-week intervals. Six patients obtained a partial response after ADOC chemotherapy and the overall clinical response rate was 75%. There were no life-threatening side effects noted. Cisplatin plus VP-16 chemotherapy (PVP) was performed in three cases before the ADOC regimen, but PVP chemotherapy did not show beneficial effects in two patients. Median survival time was 19 months. ADOC chemotherapy appears to have significant activity against thymic carcinoma.     

Treatment of stage D2 hormone refractory carcinoma of the prostate with 5-fluorouracil and Roferon-A: a Southwest Oncology Group study

Based upon prior data suggesting that alpha-interferon possesses chemomodulatory activity, the Southwest Oncology Group conducted a study in which patients with hormone refractory, metastatic (stage D2) adenocarcinoma of the prostate were treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and Roferon-A. All patients had bidimensionally measurable disease. Treatment consisted of 5-FU 750 mg/m2/day by continuous i.v. infusion for 5 days with Roferon-A 9 million units subcutaneously ono days 1, 3 and 5. Roferon-A was continued three times weekly throughout treatment. Following a one week hiatus from 5-FU (week 2), 5-FU was continued at a dose of 750 mg/m2 i.v. bolus weekly. Nineteen patients were evaluable for toxicity. The most common toxicities were gastrointestinal and mucosal, hematologic and a flu-like syndrome. There were no deaths related to treatment. Among the 14 patients evaluable for response, the response rate was 0% (95% confidence interval, 0-18%). Thirteen of the 19 evaluable patients have died with a median survival of 9 months. The combination of 5-FU and Roferon-A does not have sufficient activity against advanced, hormone refractory prostate cancer to warrant further investigation.     

A phase II evaluation of a 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Southwest Oncology Group study 0007

BACKGROUND: Previous data from an institutional pilot study in patients with advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) who received treated a combined chemotherapy regimen of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil indicated an overall response rate of 60% and a median survival of 6 months. To validate these results and to determine the feasibility of this combination, a Phase II study was conducted by the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG S0007). METHODS: Patients with advanced or recurrent SCCHN were eligible if they had received 1 previous regimen of induction/adjuvant chemotherapy or no prior systemic therapy. Patients received treatment with paclitaxel (135 mg/m(2) on Day 1), followed by cisplatin (75 mg/m(2) on Day 1), and 5-fluorouracil (1000 mg/m(2)per day as a 96-hour continuous infusion on Days 1-4) every 21 days. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients received a combined total of 286 cycles of chemotherapy. Sixty-nine patients were evaluable for response. There were 5 complete responses (7%) and 23 partial responses (33%) partial responses, for an overall response rate of 41%. The median progression-free survival was 4 months, and the median overall survival was 10 months. Six treatment-related deaths were documented, including deaths in 2 patients who had a Zubrod PS of 2. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria [version 2.0]) was observed in 47% of patients. Other Grade 3 or 4 adverse events included mucositis (34% of patients), nausea (20% of patients), anemia (9% of patients), and neuropathy (8% of patients). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil had efficacy similar to that of standard treatment regimens in patients with advanced or recurrent SCCHN but with increased toxicity.     

A randomized trial of induction therapy (daunorubicin, vincristine, prednisone versus daunorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, cytarabine and 6-thioguanine) in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia with long-term follow-up: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study (E3486)

In this study of previously untreated adult acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) performed by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, patients were randomized to induction therapy with either DVP (daunorubicin 45 mg/m2 daily, days 1, 2 and 3; prednisone 60 mg/m2 daily orally days 1-35; and vincristine 2 mg intravenously on days 1, 8, 15 and 22) or DATVP (daunorubicin 60 mg/m2 daily, days 1, 2 and 3; cytarabine 25 mg/m2 intravenous bolus followed by 200 mg/m2 daily as a continuous infusion on days 1-5; 6-thioguanine 100 mg/m2 orally every 12 h on days 1-5; vincristine 2 mg intravenously on days 1 and 8; and prednisone 60 mg/m2/day orally, days 1-7. Complete responders to both regimens received the same post-remission therapy, which consisted of a single course of cytarabine 3 gm/m2 infused over 1 h every 12 h for 12 doses. One month later those patients still in remission received six cycles of consolidation therapy with MACHO (cyclophosphamide 650 mg/m2, doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 vincristine 2mg all intravenously on day 1 with prednisone 100 mg/m2 orally daily on days 1-5. Methotrexate 200 mg/m2 intravenously and L-asparaginase 6000 U/m2 were given on day 22 and each course was given every 5 weeks. A single dose of intrathecal methotrexate was also given with each MACHO course. There were 276 evaluable patients randomized in this study. Complete response rates were 71% for DVP and 58% for DATVP. Median durations of complete response were 5.5 and 6.8 months, respectively. Median survival of all randomized patients was 14.4 months in each group. DATVP was more toxic than DVP. Intensification of treatment for adults with ALL may not improve outcome. Progress in the treatment of adults with ALL will require the identification of new agents for this neoplasm.     

Prospective study with combined low-dose chemotherapy and zidovudine in 37 patients with poor-prognosis AIDS-related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. French-Italian Cooperative Study Group.

The French-Italian Cooperative Study Group included patients with poor-prognosis AIDS-related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), defined as those with performance status (PS) > or = 3 and/or opportunistic infections (OI), in a prospective study with a 50% reduced-dose combination chemotherapy regimen: CHVmP-Vincristine-bleo (cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, doxorubicin 25 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, teniposide 30 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, prednisone 20 mg/m2 per os days 1-5, vincristine 2 mg i.v. day 15, and bleomycin 10 mg i.v. day 15), given every 21 days for eight cycles, and concomitant zidovudine 500 mg per os per day. The aims of this combined treatment were to reduce bone marrow toxicity and infectious complications related to chemotherapy (with a low-dose chemotherapy regimen), and to control the HIV and related infectious complications (with zidovudine therapy). Thirty-seven patients entered this prospective study. At the time of the NHL diagnosis, 41% of the patients had asymptomatic HIV infection, 27% had ARC and 32% had already had CDC-defined diagnoses of AIDS. The median CD4+ cell count was 35 mm3. Only 29 patients are evaluable for response, since 8 received only one cycle of chemotherapy. Fifteen of 29 (52%) patients obtained objective responses, with only 4 (14%) achieving complete remissions (CR) of 1, 4, 14 and 29+ months. Three (16%) CRs were achieved in 19 evaluable patients included in the study because of poor PS, and only one CR was observed in 10 evaluable patients with histories of OI, either alone or with poor PS. The most common side effect was bone marrow toxicity with 2 related toxic deaths.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Mitoxantrone, cyclophosphamide, and fluorouracil in metastatic breast cancer unresponsive to hormonal therapy

Fifty-two patients with hormonally unresponsive or estrogen receptor negative metastatic breast cancer who had not received prior chemotherapy received mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2, and 5-fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2 (MCF) by short intravenous infusion every 21 days. Disease that was resistant or stable to this regimen was treated with doxorubicin 25 mg/m2/day for two days and vinblastine 1.4 mg/m2/day for four days (DV). Both drugs were given by continuous infusion. Thirty-one partial remissions and four complete remissions occurred after treatment with MCF. Only thirty-four evaluable patients crossed to the DV phase with partial remission (11 patients), stable (five patients), or resistant (18 patients) disease. Eleven patients' responses were upgraded. The median overall time to progression (TTP), defined as the sum of the TTP on MCF and TTP on DV, was 12 months. The median survival of all patients was 19 months. Granulocytopenia was the dose limiting toxicity for MCF, but cumulative thrombocytopenia was noted. Nausea and vomiting occurred in most patients but was mild. Severe alopecia occurred in half the patients. One patient developed congestive heart failure after receiving a cumulative dose of 206 mg/m2 of mitoxantrone. The incidence of infectious complications was 35% on each regimen; 50% of these were mild. MCF is an effective combination that was well tolerated. Objective responses, durations of response, and survival were similar, but not superior, to standard doxorubicin-based combinations. Toxicity was somewhat less.     

Randomized trial comparing protracted infusion of 5-fluorouracil with weekly doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide with a monthly bolus FAC regimen in metastatic breast carcinoma (SPM90).

Infusional 5-fluorouracil in advanced breast cancer has been associated with improved clinical response rates when compared with conventional bolus therapy. As a first line of chemotherapy in proven metastatic breast carcinoma, 258 women were randomly assigned to receive FAC consisting of 5-fluorouracil (F) 600 mg m(-2) intravenously (i.v.) over 1 h on days 1, 2 and 3, doxorubicin (A) 50 mg m(-2) i.v. bolus on day 1 and cyclophosphamide (C), 400 mg m(-2) i.v. bolus on days 1, 2 and 3 or ''FULON'' consisting of 5-fluorouracil 250 mg m(-2) day(-1) continuously infused from day 1 to day 22, doxorubicin 15 mg m(-2) i.v. bolus on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 and cyclophosphamide 300 mg m(-2) i.v. bolus on days 1, 8, 15 and 22. Chemotherapy courses were administered 4-weekly for the bolus regimen and 6-weekly for FULON. Pretreatment characteristics were identical between the two groups. Response rates were 54% in the FAC arm and 53% in the FULON arm. Time to progression was 14 months in the FAC arm and 12 months in the FULON arm. Differences were not statistically significant. Median overall survival duration for all patients was 22 months. Haematological toxicity was more severe in the bolus-treated group (P = 0.05), as were nausea and vomiting (P < or = 0.01). We conclude that the two regimens appeared equally effective but have different toxicities.     

Dose-escalation of CHOP in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Background: CHOP is considered to be the gold standard for patients with histologically aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma both in limited and advanced stages. In order to determine the maximum tolerable dose of an intensified CHOP regimen, a dose-escalation study of CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) was started.Patients and methods: With an increased fixed dose of doxorubicin at 75 mg/m2 instead of 50 mg/m2 on day 1 and standard doses of vincristine (1.4 mg/m2 on day 1) and prednisone (100 mg day 1 through 5), cyclophosphamide dose was escalated by increments of 250 mg/m2 in consecutive cohorts of at least three patients starting from 1000 mg/m2. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) support was added to the regimen starting from the dose-level inducing grade 4 neutropenia lasting more than five days in two patients. Dose limiting toxicity was defined as either the dose inducing grade 4 neutropenia lasting more than seven days despite the use of G-CSF, or grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia lasting more than seven days, or any grade 4 non-hematological toxicity other than alopecia. The dose-level below the one inducing dose-limiting toxicity was defined as maximum tolerable dose. All patients were treated on an outpatient basis. Dose-intensity parameters for single agent doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as well as for the whole regimen were evaluated.Results: Eighty-seven patients are evaluable over a four-year study period. At 1750 mg/m2 dose-level, G-CSF was added to the regimen according to described criteria. At the cyclophosphamide dose of 3000 mg/m2, dose-limiting hematological toxicity occurred in two patients, with one grade 4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia and one grade 4 neutropenia lasting more than seven days. Thus, cyclophosphamide dose of 2750 mg/m2 was defined as maximum tolerable dose.Conclusions: CHOP intensification of approximately 1.8 times that of the standard regimen is feasible and safely administered on an outpatient basis with G-CSF support. Further investigation on the role of dose-intensity in the outcome of NHL should focus on the comparison of intensified CHOP regimen and standard CHOP or high-dose chemotherapy.     

Doxorubicin and paclitaxel versus fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide as first-line therapy for women with metastatic breast cancer: final results of a randomized phase III multicenter trial.

PURPOSE: This phase III trial compared the efficacy and safety of doxorubicin and paclitaxel (AT) to 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) as first-line therapy for women with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 267 women with metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive either AT (doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2) followed 24 hours later by paclitaxel 220 mg/m(2)) or FAC (5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2), doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2)), each administered every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles. Patients had to have measurable disease and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2. Only one prior non-anthracycline, nontaxane-containing adjuvant chemotherapy regimen was allowed. RESULTS: Overall response rates for patients randomized to AT and FAC were 68% and 55%, respectively (P =.032). Median time to progression and overall survival were significantly longer for AT compared with FAC (time to progression 8.3 months v 6.2 months [P =.034]; overall survival 23.3 months v 18.3 months [P =.013]). Therapy was generally well-tolerated (median of eight cycles delivered in each arm). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was more common with AT than with FAC (89% v 65%; P <.001); however, the incidence of fever and infection was low. Grade 3 or 4 arthralgia and myalgia, peripheral neuropathy, and diarrhea were more common with AT, whereas nausea and vomiting were more common with FAC. The incidence of cardiotoxicity was low in both arms. CONCLUSION: AT conferred a significant advantage in response rate, time to progression, and overall survival compared with FAC. Treatment was well-tolerated with no unexpected toxicities.     

Phase I study of concomitant chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel, fluorouracil, gemcitabine, and twice-daily radiation in patients with poor-prognosis cancer of the head and neck.

PURPOSE: We previously demonstrated high locoregional control, in patients with poor-prognosis head and neck cancer (HNC), using paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil, hydroxyurea, and concomitant hyperfractionated radiotherapy. In the present phase I trial, gemcitabine, a novel antimetabolite with strong radiation-enhancing activity, replaces hydroxyurea. We sought to determine the recommended phase II dose and clinical efficacy in poor-prognosis HNC patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Seventy-two patients enrolled. Eligibility criteria included recurrent or second primary HNC, metastases or expected 2-year survival <20%. Chemoradiotherapy consisted of 5-fluorouracil, 600 mg/m(2)/d, for 5 days; paclitaxel, 100 mg/m(2) on Day 1; and concurrent 1.5 Gy twice-daily radiation for 5 days. Gemcitabine was dose escalated, 50-300 mg/m(2) on day 1. Cycles repeated every 14 days until the completion of chemoradiation. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) included: neutropenic fever; grade > or =4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia for >4 days; grade > or =4 mucositis or dermatitis for >7 days; or grade 3 toxicity necessitating chemotherapy dose reductions. Non-DLT dose reductions in 5-fluorouracil and/or paclitaxel were allowed. RESULTS: Seventy-nine percent of assessable patients experienced a clinical response. Five-year actuarial survival is 33.0%, and locoregional control is 61.4%. The recommended phase II dose of gemcitabine in this regimen is 100 mg/m(2) during cycles 1-5 (1 of 7 patients with DLT) or 200 mg/m(2) delivered only during cycles 3-5 (3 of 19 with DLT). Grades 3 and 4 mucositis (56 and 21%, respectively) and dermatitis (25 and 21%, respectively) were common. CONCLUSIONS: Gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, paclitaxel, and twice-daily radiation, delivered on alternating weeks, is active in patients with poor-prognosis HNC, although severe mucositis limits the clinical applicability of this regimen. Refinements in radiotherapy, including intensity-modulated radiation therapy, may improve the tolerance for this regimen.     

A phase II trial of edatrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin, cisplastin, and filgrastim (EVAC/G-CSF) in patients with non-small-cell carcinoma of the lungs: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group Trial.

Edatrexate is an antifolate agent with improved in vitro antineoplastic activity as compared with methotrexate. A Mayo phase I trial of edatrexate (E), vinblastine (V), doxorubicin (Adriamycin) (A), cisplatin (C), and filgrastim (GCSF), (EVAC-GCSF) showed promising antineoplastic activity in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (Colon-Otero G, et al. Cancer J Sci Am 1997;3:297-302) leading to a phase II trial of this regimen, the results of which are reported here. A total of 34 patients with stage IIIB or IV measurable or evaluable NSCLC were entered in this North Central Cancer Treatment Group phase II study. Treatment consisted of edatrexate 100 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 and cisplatin 30 mg/m2/d on day 1 and day 2 followed by vinblastine 3 mg/m2 intravenously and doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 intravenously on day 2. Filgrastim was given at 300 microg subcutaneously daily from day 4 to day 18 or until an absolute neutrophil count of 2,000/mm3 or more was obtained. Cycles were repeated every 21 days until either progression or the development of intolerable toxicity. Sixteen of 34 evaluable patients responded to therapy, for a response rate of 47.1% with a 95% CI of 30.3% to 63.8%. Median time to disease progression was 132 days, median survival time was 219 days, and the estimated 1-year survival was 41.2% (95% CI of 27.6-61.5%). The EVAC/G-CSF regimen has significant antineoplastic activity as seen by the response rates for patients with NSCLC. However, this study had significant myelosuppressive toxicity; 56% patients had grade III or higher leukopenia with three treatment-related deaths observed. In addition, Quality of Life assessments indicate that patients experienced an overall decline in quality of life during the course of treatment. These mitigating factors need to be considered regarding further evaluation of this regimen in this patient population.     

Etoposide combined with cyclophosphamide plus vincristine compared with doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide plus vincristine and with high-dose cyclophosphamide plus vincristine in the treatment of small-cell carcinoma of the lung: a randomized trial of the Bristol Lung Cancer Study Group

A total of 353 patients with previously untreated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) were accrued in this multicenter trial. Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of the following three regimens: cyclophosphamide 1,000 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) day 1, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 IV day 1, and etoposide 50 mg/m2 IV day 1, followed by etoposide 100 mg/m2/day orally days 2 through 5 (CEV); cyclophosphamide 1,000 mg/m2 IV day 1, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 IV day 1, and doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 IV day 1 (CAV); cyclophosphamide 2,000 mg/m2 day 1 and vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 IV day 1 (CV). Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. Treatment groups were comparable with respect to extent of disease, age, sex, performance status, and metastatic sites. No significant differences in response rates, response duration, or survival could be detected in limited disease, although there appeared to be a trend favoring CEV. Among extensive-disease patients, response duration on the CEV regimen was longer than on the CV regimen or the CAV program (P less than .001). The superiority of the CEV regimen was also demonstrated in the survival analysis in which differences attained statistical significance (P = .01). In this group the median survival was increased from 29 weeks on CV to 31 weeks on CAV and 39 weeks on CEV. Myelosuppression was the most frequent toxicity. It was more severe with CV than CEV or CAV. Most nonhematologic side effects were comparable among the three treatment groups. However, the high doses of cyclophosphamide in the CV regimen produced a higher incidence of hemorrhagic cystitis than in the CEV or CAV programs (P less than .001). Cardiotoxicity only occurred in the CAV group (P = .05). The addition of etoposide to the CV regimen resulted in significantly longer response duration and survival without increased toxicity. Similarly, the substitution of etoposide for the doxorubicin in the CAV regimen was associated with prolonged survival and reduced cardiotoxicity.     

Chemotherapy of invasive thymoma

Thirty-two patients with stage III or IV invasive thymoma (14 women and 18 men; median age, 40 years) were treated at the Padua Medical Oncology Department from 1977 to 1988. All patients received the following chemotherapy in 4-day courses: 50 mg/m2 of cisplatin intravenously (IV) and 40 mg/m2 of doxorubicin IV on day 1; 0.6 mg/m2 of vincristine IV on day 3; and 700 mg/m2 of cyclophosphamide IV on day 4 (ADOC). The courses were repeated every 3 weeks, and toxic effects were tolerable. The radiologically defined overall clinical response rate (complete plus partial response) was 91% with 47% clinical complete remissions; median time to progression was 11 months (range, 0 to 96) and the median estimated (Kaplan-Meier) progression-free interval was 22 months. Five of the 15 clinical complete remissions were pathologically confirmed at thoracotomy. We believe the ADOC regimen qualifies for adjuvant and preoperative treatment of invasive thymoma due to the high complete response and overall response rates.