The National Health Service Corps for the 21st century

The National Health Service Corps (NHSC) was created in 1970 to provide primary health care clinicians for the underserved. The article includes a review of the peer-reviewed and intragovernmental literature on the NHSC program from 1971 to 1998 and also presents a current profile of the program. Despite significant increases in NHSC field strength since 1991, the 2,439 clinicians meet only 12% of the need for primary health care providers in underserved areas. While the NHSC has successfully addressed clinician diversity and retention issues, community and site development remain barriers to increasing access. Most communities in need are not ready to recruit and support clinicians. The NHSC of the next millennium must work with the neediest communities to reach the appropriate stage of readiness. Only after completing the necessary "preplacement" activities can the NHSC assist in the recruitment and placement of clinicians to increase access.     

Proposed Changes to Designations of Medically Underserved Populations and Health Professional Shortage Areas: Effects on Rural Areas

This paper reports an analysis of the proposed rule to combine medically underserved population (MUP) and health professional shortage area (HPSA) designations, as published by the Bureau of Primary Health Care (BPHC) in the Federal Register on Sept. 1, 1998 (Department of Health and Human Services, 1998). The effects of the proposed rule overall and on rural communities were examined, particularly with respect to current whole county HPSA designations and eligibility for federal assistance programs. National, county-level estimates of primary care provider counts and other measures included in the proposed rule were used. Different primary care provider sources were compared; results were highly dependent on the data source and the inclusions of counts of nurse practitioners and physician assistants. The projections of losses from the proposed rule were higher than those of the BPHC, probably due to the use of different sources for provider counts. Overall, the authors projected that more than 50 percent of current whole-county HPSAs would lose designation using the proposed rule. The proportion of rural counties that lost designation was not significantly greater than the proportion of urban counties, but because there are many more rural counties, more de-designations were projected to occur in rural areas. The researchers also predicted that 58 percent of rural whole-county HPSAs with National Health Service Corps providers would lose their designation, but most rural whole-county HPSAs with Community and Migrant Health Centers or Rural Health Clinics retained their MUP designation using the proposed rule. The proposed rule likely has a larger effect on current designations than originally projected by the BPHC.     

Attracting physicians to underserved communities: the role of health networks

As health networks battle for additional market share and encourage additional Medicaid HMO subscribers to use their physicians and hospitals, more health executives are analyzing proposals of how to attract qualified doctors to practice in poor rural or inner-city communities. Supplying more physicians to those areas by increasing the number of medical schools, expanding the National Health Service Corps (NHSC) program, and allowing more international medical graduates (IMGs) to pursue residency training in the United States have been relatively unsuccessful strategies to improve America's geographic maldistribution of medical manpower. This article focuses on several approaches that health networks might use to increase market penetration and at the same time deliver enhanced health services to the underserved. Health networks may provide eminent leadership in the overall design and governance of soundly conceived Medicaid HMOs; strengthen existing or develop additional community health/primary care centers; interface more effectively with local schools to foster Medicaid HMOs for children of low-income families; and reimburse at "premium rates" primary care physicians who practice in underserved communities. The reluctance of physicians to practice in these areas and of middle-income and upper-income taxpayers, and therefore elected officials, to support increased spending or redirection of funds continue to be major barriers for health alliances to demonstrate willingness to invest additional resources in poor inner-city and rural environments.     

A rural-urban comparative study of nonphysician providers in community and migrant health centers.

This is a study of the employment of nonphysician providers--nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and certified nurse midwives--in both rural and urban Community and Migrant Health Centers and of factors associated with their employment, based on a 1991 national survey of 383 Centers. Results of the survey suggest that nonphysician providers, in particular nurse practitioners and certified nurse midwives, primarily serve as physician substitutes, and are more likely to be employed by Centers that are larger and have affiliations with nonphysician provider training programs. Rural or urban location is not significantly related to the employment of nonphysician providers after controlling for center size. The fact that rural centers employ fewer nonphysician providers than urban centers can primarily be accounted for by their relatively small size, rather than a lack of interest. These findings demonstrate that the use of nonphysician providers is an important way both to achieve cost containment and improve access to primary care for those residing in medically underserved areas.     

The National Health Service Corps: rapid growth and uncertain future

From inauspicious origins in laudable, but vague, legislation and diffident--even disorganized--implementation, the NHSC has evolved into a major federal program for delivering health care to underserved areas. Tying together the financing of medical education and the delivery of health services for the first time could enable responsiveness to both qualitative and quantitative changes in medical care. But competing demands, within the program and its administration, and in the communities to be served, have made evaluation of the NHSC effort and impact difficult, but all the more necessary for future planning.     

National Health Service Corps Staffing and the Growth of the Local Rural Non-NHSC Primary Care Physician Workforce

CONTEXT: Beyond providing temporary staffing, National Health Service Corps (NHSC) clinicians are believed by some observers to contribute to the long-term growth of the non-NHSC physician workforce of the communities where they serve; others worry that NHSC clinicians compete with and impede the supply of other local physicians. PURPOSE: To assess long-term changes in the non-NHSC primary care physician workforce of rural underserved counties that have received NHSC staffing support relative to workforce changes in underserved counties without NHSC support. METHODS: Using data from the American Medical Association and NHSC, we compared changes from 1981 to 2001 in non-NHSC primary care physician to population ratios in 2 subsets of rural whole-county health professional shortage areas: (1) 141 counties staffed by NHSC physicians, nurse practitioners, and/or physician assistants during the early 1980s and for many of the years since and (2) all 142 rural health professional shortage area counties that had no NHSC clinicians from 1979 through 2001. FINDINGS: From 1981 to 2001, counties staffed by NHSC clinicians experienced a mean increase of 1.4 non-NHSC primary care physicians per 10,000 population, compared to a smaller, 0.57 mean increase in counties without NHSC clinicians. The finding of greater non-NHSC primary care physician to population mean ratio increase in NHSC-supported counties remained significant after adjusting for baseline county demographics and health care resources (P < .001). The estimated number of "extra" non-NHSC physicians in NHSC-supported counties in 2001 attributable to the NHSC was 294 additional physicians for the 141 supported counties, or 2 extra physicians, on average, for each NHSC-supported county. Over the 20 years, more NHSC-supported counties saw their non-NHSC primary care workforces grow to more than 1 physician per 3,500 persons, but no more NHSC-supported than nonsupported counties lost their health professional shortage area designations. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the NHSC contributed positively to the non-NHSC primary care physician workforce in the rural underserved counties where its clinicians worked during the 1980s and 1990s.     

The National Area Health Education Center Program and Primary Care Residency Training

The Area Health Education Center (AHEC) program was established in 1972 to improve the supply, distribution, retention and quality of primary care and other health practitioners in medically underserved areas. Through academic/community partnerships, regional AHECs offer a broad array of educational programs for students, residents and practicing health professionals. With primary care medical education a core part of AHEC programs, AHECs have been involved in decentralized residency training from the outset, with particular attention to family medicine. This paper provides an overview of the national AHEC program, its core components and its support for primary care residency training. Although AHECs have achieved considerable success in training primary care physicians for their respective states, continued refinements of programs are needed to address the needs of the most rural and underserved communities.     

An evaluation of community health center adoption of online health information

Health care providers and patients in community health centers often lack access to online scientific and patient education resources. These resources can improve medical decision making and promote communication between provider and patient. In 2000, a community health information program, Partners for Health Information, provided 10 community health centers in Washington, D.C. with computers, training, and consumer health resources, supplemented with visits to coach patients and staff in their use. The purpose of this study is to assess the adoption of the use of online health information among staff in seven of these health centers. The methods of this evaluation were designed to measure frequency of patient referral by health center staff to online health information and to describe providers' perceptions of the barriers and enablers to using online resources. Recommendations made by respondents can be used to modify the Partners program and guide the development of other similar programs.     

National Health Service Corp: A survey of Alabama's scholarship recipients

In April 1979, 41 Alabama medical students who had received scholarships from the National Health Service Corps (NHSC) were surveyed. The students were predominantly single urban individuals who received their initial NHSC scholarship in the first or second year of medical school. The majority who planned primary care careers were undecided about remaining in the NHSC after their commitment. The students were concerned about the logistics of the NHSC and practice in rural areas. Based on their response, it is suggested that medical schools, The American Medical Student Association, and the NHSC develop a series of activities designed to facilitate the NHSC scholarship recipients subsequent activities in the NHSC. These suggestions include elective credit for NHSC/AMSA (American Medical Student Association) preceptorships, curriculum offering that facilitate the physician's practice in underserved communities, and activities that facilitate the medical school faculties' understanding of the NHSC.     

The Determinants of Utilization of Nonphysician Providers in Rural Community and Migrant Health Centers

The use of nonphysician providers, such as nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and certified nurse midwives, in rural areas is critically important due to the continued primary care access problems. This study examines the major factors influencing the use of nonphysician providers in rural community and migrant health centers based on a 1991 national survey of the centers. This study demonstrates that the employment of nonphysician providers in rural community and migrant health centers is significantly influenced by both supply and demand factors. Among supply factors, there is a significant and positive relationship between the number of total staff and the number of nonphysician providers employed. There is a significant but inverse relationship between the number of physicians and the number of nonphysician providers employed, indicating nonphysician providers primarily serve as substitutes for physicians in rural community and migrant health centers. The supply of nonphysician providers, as measured by the number of affiliated training programs, is significantly related to the employment of nonphysician providers. The demand variable, geographic location, and the centers' staffing policies are also significant determinants of the use of nonphysician providers.     

The Role of Community Health Centers in Providing Behavioral Health Care

The prevalence of behavioral health problems is higher for low-income individuals, yet this population is less likely to receive behavioral health treatment. Community health centers have their advantages as behavioral health-care providers because they serve a majority low-income population and are located in medically underserved areas. Their role in providing behavioral health care is expected to expand under health reform as they are expected to double their patient capacity, and due to increased insurance coverage for individuals with behavioral health problems. However, the ability of community health centers to provide behavioral health care is compromised by provider shortages and funding shortfalls.     

A health professional students' cultural competence and attitudes toward the poor: the influence of a clinical practicum supported by the National Health Service Corps

To provide quality health care today, practitioners must be culturally competent. Funding sources, such as the federal government, recognize the need to prepare culturally competent clinicians. The mission of the National Health Service Corps (NHSC), a federal program, is to increase access to primary care services and reduce health disparities by assisting in the preparation of community-responsive, culturally competent primary care clinicians. This study evaluated an NHSC program that funded, in part, health professional students' educational programs. Following their participation in an NHSC-supported clinical experience, students were assessed on their cultural competence, perceptions of the poor, and intention of serving in an underserved community. Health professional students completed a survey before and after the clinical practicum. Participants included students who were studying to be physicians, physician assistants, social workers, and nurse practitioners. Results of the study found no change in students' cultural competence after their clinical practicum. Although they remained in the "culturally aware" stage, they were not considered either "culturally proficient" or "culturally competent." However, their attitudes toward those in poverty were more positive than in previous studies of health professionals. The greatest impact from the students' clinical experience was their increased intention to practice in an underserved community following their practicum. They found their experience with the underserved to be rewarding, challenging, and humbling. Documenting the influence that government-funded programs have on health professional students is extremely important in studies such as this.     

A Community Development Approach to Rural Recruitment

ABSTRACT: Programs designed to empower rural communities for health care provider recruitment have usually focused on the health care sector without aggressively addressing broader community development issues. The Recruitable Community Project (RCP) in West Virginia includes community education on recruiting and also assessments of and recommendations to rural communities on broad-based community development, aiming to enhance communities' recruiting potential. The project provides multidisciplinary university-based planning assistance programs for small communities, involving collaborative community visits. The project also uses a project manager as a "community encourager" who participates in community education and in the formulation of sustained community recruiting efforts. From August 1999 through August 2001, 7 underserved rural communities completed the RCP organizational processes and hosted planning assistance teams. Members of community recruitment boards gave high marks to the RCP process, its planning assistance teams, and its usefulness in establishing community ties to state and academic agencies. Since working with the RCP, the 7 communities have recruited 27 providers, success possibly stimulated by their RCP involvement (data current as of September 2002). This model of community training and development to empower rural communities to better recruit health professionals shows early promise. This model could be broadened to include more collaboration of community development and health science disciplines programs for recruitment and retention efforts.     

Impact of Title VII training programs on community health center staffing and national health service corps participation

PURPOSE Community health centers (CHCs) are a critical component of the health care safety net. President Bush’s recent effort to expand CHC capacity coincides with difficulty recruiting primary care physicians and substantial cuts in federal grant programs designed to prepare and motivate physicians to practice in underserved settings. This article examines the association between physicians’ attendance in training programs funded by Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Title VII Section 747 Primary Care Training Grants and 2 outcome variables: work in a CHC and participation in the National Health Service Corps Loan Repayment Program (NHSC LRP).     

Family practice residencies in community health centers--an approach to cost and access concerns.

An inadequate number of trained primary care clinicians limits access to care at Community Health Centers. If family practice residents working in these centers can provide care to patients at a cost that is comparable to the center''s hiring its own physicians, then expansion of Family Practice Residency Programs into community centers can address both cost and access concerns. A cost-benefit analysis of the Family Practice Residency Program at the Fresno, CA, community center was performed; the community center is affiliated with the University of California at San Francisco. Costs included (a) residents'' salaries, (b) supervision of the family practice residents, (c) family practice program costs for educational activities apart from supervision at the community center, and (d) administrative costs attributable to family practice residents in the community center. Benefits were based on the number of patients that residents saw in the community center. Using this approach, a cost of $7,700 per resident per year was calculated. This cost is modest compared with the cost of training residents in inpatient settings. The added costs attributable to training residents in community health centers can be shared with agencies that are concerned with medical education, providing physicians to underserved communities, and increasing the supply of primary care physicians. Redirecting graduate medical education funding from hospitals to selected ambulatory care training centers of excellence would facilitate placing residents in community centers. This change would have the dual advantage of addressing the current imbalance between training in ambulatory care and hospital sites and increasing the capacity of community health centers to meet the health care needs of underserved populations.     

HRSA's Models That Work Program: implications for improving access to primary health care.

The main objective of the Models That Work Campaign (MTW) is improving access to health care for vulnerable and underserved populations. A collaboration between the Bureau of Primary Health Care (BPHC) at the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and 39 cosponsors--among them national associations, state and federal agencies, community-based organizations, foundations, and businesses--this initiative gives recognition and visibility to innovative and effective service delivery models. Models are selected based on a set of criteria that includes delivery of high quality primary care services, community participation, integration of health and social services, quantifiable outcomes, and replicability. Winners of the competition are showcased nationally and hired to provide training to other communities, to document and publish their strategies, and to provide onsite technical assistance on request.     

Caring for the underserved: current practice of alumni of the National Health Service Corps

The objective of this study was to examine the number and characteristics of National Health Service Corps (NHSC) alumni who currently practice with an underserved population. The study design was a cross-sectional survey mailed in 1998 to a sample of 2,160 alumni. The response rate was 58.9 percent; overall, 52.5 percent of respondents reported currently working with the underserved. In bivariate analyses, retention in practice with the underserved was associated with several clinician and service experience variables. In a logistic regression model, higher initial desire to work with the underserved, older age, job satisfaction, and higher salary were associated with current service. The authors conclude that more than half of the NHSC alumni responding to the survey reported working with an underserved population in 1998. Associations between clinician and service experience characteristics and retention in practice with the underserved can inform policy and research to improve retention.     

Retaining medical directors in community health centers. The importance of administrative relationships

Physician retention has become a critical issue for maintaining the success of today's health care organizations. With many external factors--increasing malpractice premiums, lower reimbursement rates, and managed care controls--driving physicians out of the practice, it is imperative to understand how the internal functions of the organization can help maintain satisfaction in the workplace and prevent physicians from leaving (Reece, 2000; Taylor, 2002). This is especially important in Community and Migrant Health Centers (C/MHCs), federally supported health clinics providing care to low-income and uninsured patients in medically underserved communities and neighborhoods. In this study, we examine the medical directors' roles and responsibilities, their relationships with the C/MHC administrators, and whether these impact satisfaction and, ultimately retention in the centers.     

Use of nonphysician health care providers for skin cancer screening in the primary care setting

BACKGROUND: Nonphysician health care providers are in an optimal position to provide cancer prevention and screening services. METHODS: We conducted a survey of primary care physicians to determine physician use and amenability to use of nonphysician health care providers to perform skin cancer screening in comparison with other cancer screening examinations. RESULTS: A total of 1,363 eligible physicians completed the survey. Of these, 631 physicians (46%) reported a nurse practitioner or physician assistant performing at least one type of cancer screening examination on their patients. Twenty-nine and 22% of all physicians reported nurse practitioners or physician assistants performing skin cancer screening, respectively. Family physicians were more likely to use nurse practitioners and physician assistants to perform these cancer screening examinations than internists (chi(2) test, P = 0.001 for each examination). Skin examinations were performed less frequently by nurse practitioners and physician assistants than all other cancer screening examinations. A total of 73-79% of family physicians and 60-70% of internists were amenable to having a nonphysician health care provider perform one or more of these examinations. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care physicians are currently utilizing nonphysician health care providers to perform cancer screening examinations and the majority of those surveyed are amenable to the use of these providers for such examinations. This suggests that one possible strategy for increasing skin cancer screening is through an expanded role of nonphysician health care providers.