GH deficiency in patients irradiated for acromegaly: significance of GH stimulatory tests in relation to the 24 h GH secretion

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy for pituitary adenomas frequently leads to GH deficiency (GHD). The characteristics of GH secretion in GHD induced by postoperative radiotherapy for acromegaly are not known. HYPOTHESIS: In the long term, stimulated and spontaneous GH release is not different between patients with GHD treated by postoperative radiotherapy for acromegaly or for other pituitary adenomas. DESIGN/SUBJECTS: We compared the characteristics of basal and stimulated GH secretion in patients with GHD, who had previously received adjunct radiotherapy after surgery for GH-producing adenomas (n=10) vs for other pituitary adenomas (n=10). All patients had a maximal GH concentration by insulin tolerance test (ITT) of 3 microg/l or less, compatible with severe GHD. Mean time after radiation was 17 and 18.7 years, respectively. Stimulated GH release was also evaluated by infusion of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH), GHRH-arginine and arginine, and spontaneous GH by 10 min blood sampling for 24 h. Pulse analyses were performed by Cluster and approximate entropy. OUTCOMES: There were no differences between both patient groups in stimulated GH concentrations in any test. Spontaneous GH secretion was not different between both patient groups, including basal GH release, pulsatility and regularity. Pulsatile secretion was lost in two acromegalic and three non-acromegalic patients. Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) was below -2 s.d. score in nine patients in each group. CONCLUSION: Acromegalic patients treated by surgery and postoperative radiotherapy with an impaired response to the ITT do not differ, in the long term, in GH secretory characteristics from patients treated similarly for other pituitary tumors with an impaired response to the ITT. The ITT (or the GHRH-arginine test) is therefore reliable in establishing the diagnosis of GHD in patients treated for acromegaly by surgery and radiotherapy.     

Acromegaly due to a growth hormone-releasing hormone-secreting bronchial carcinoid tumor: further information on the abnormal responsiveness of the somatotroph cells and their recovery after successful treatment

We studied GH secretion in a patient with acromegaly and a bronchial carcinoid tumor before and again after surgical removal of this tumor. Before removal of the carcinoid tumor, plasma GH increased slightly after glucose loading (OGTT) and markedly after TRH (650%) and insulin (440%) treatment. Plasma GH did not change after GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), LHRH, or L-dopa administration. Somatostatin (SRIH) infusion lowered plasma GH. No change in plasma immunoreactive GHRH (IR-GHRH) occurred after TRH, glucose, insulin, or SRIH administration. Two weeks after removal of the carcinoid tumor, TRH induced GH secretion (250%) when the IR-GHRH level was undetectable and somatomedin-C was within normal limits. Fifteen weeks after surgery, the patient had normal GH secretion. In conclusion: no pattern of GH secretion is diagnostic of acromegaly due to ectopic GHRH secretion, but the lack of GH response to exogenous GHRH and a large response during hypoglycemia may be features of this condition. When acromegaly and abnormal GH responsiveness are induced by a GHRH-secreting tumor, the increases in plasma GH after TRH, glucose, and insulin administration are not mediated by GHRH. After removal of the GHRH-secreting tumor, persistent paradoxical GH response to TRH does not require abnormally high IR-GHRH levels and does not preclude complete recovery.     

Sexual dimorphism of growth hormone (GH) regulation in humans: endogenous GH-releasing hormone maintains basal GH in women but not in men

GH secretory patterns in humans are sexually dimorphic in terms of pulse regularity, amplitude of the diurnal rhythm, and magnitude of basal (trough) secretion. The neuroendocrine mechanisms of gender-specific GH regulation in humans are currently unknown, but the interpulse GH levels are generally assumed to be controlled by somatostatin. In rats, however, administration of antiserum to GHRH lowers GH interpulse levels in females but not males. In this study, using a competitive antagonist to GHRH in humans, we investigated whether endogenous GHRH has differential, gender-specific effects on the interpulse GH levels. Six healthy men and five healthy women (20-28 yr old) who were nonobese, did not smoke, and were on no medications known to influence GH secretion were studied. Each served as his or her own control during an infusion of GHRH antagonist or saline for a 27-h period. A control bolus of GHRH was given near the end of the infusion. In both sexes during GHRH antagonist infusion, mean GH, pulse amplitude, and GH response to GHRH decreased significantly, whereas pulse frequency remained unchanged. However, during the GHRH antagonist infusion, trough GH did not significantly change in men (P = 0.54) but significantly decreased in women (P = 0.008). Deconvolution analysis confirmed the lack of a significant change in basal secretion in men (P = 0.81) as opposed to women (P = 0.006). We conclude that sexual dimorphism in the neuroendocrine regulation of GH secretion in humans involves a differential role of endogenous GHRH in maintaining baseline GH.     

Acromegaly due to GHRH-secreting large bronchial carcinoid. Complete recovery following tumor surgery.

A case of acromegaly, secondary to GHRH secretion by a large bronchial carcinoid is reported. A 61-year-old woman presented with typical symptoms and signs of acromegaly for at least 10 years. She suffered from recurrent pneumonias, but repeated chest X-ray examinations failed to demonstrate the bronchial tumor. The diagnosis was confirmed by elevated GH, IGF-1 and GHRH secretion. We have shown an enlarged pituitary gland without focal lesions together with a cerebral meningioma on MRI and the presence of a bronchial carcinoid tumor. The latter was confirmed by histology carried out after bronchoscopy and tumor excision. We observed partial suppression of GH secretion following short-term oral bromocriptine administration in this patient. Surgical removal of the carcinoid tumor resulted in a complete clinical, hormonal and radiological cure of acromegaly. This case of acromegaly due to ectopic GHRH secretion by bronchial carcinoid differs from others described in the literature by an atypical large tumor size, the suppression of elevated GH secretion by oral bromocriptine and a concomitant meningioma.     

Continuous 24-hour intravenous infusion of recombinant human growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone-(1-44)-amide augments pulsatile, entropic, and daily rhythmic GH secretion in postmenopausal women equally in the estrogen-withdrawn and estrogen-supplemented states

How estrogen amplifies GH secretion in the human is not known. The present study tests the clinical hypothesis that estradiol modulates the stimulatory actions of a primary GH feedforward signal, GHRH. To this end, we investigated the ability of short-term (7- to 12-day) supplementation with oral estradiol vs. placebo to modulate basal, pulsatile, entropic, and 24-h rhythmic GH secretion driven by a continuous iv infusion of recombinant human GHRH-(1--44)-amide vs. saline in nine healthy postmenopausal women. Volunteers underwent concurrent blood sampling every 10 min for 24 h on four occasions in a prospectively randomized, single blind, within-subject cross-over design (placebo/saline, placebo/GHRH, estradiol/saline, estradiol/GHRH). Intensively sampled serum GH concentrations were quantitated by ultrasensitive chemiluminescence assay. Basal, pulsatile, entropic (feedback-sensitive), and 24-h rhythmic modes of GH secretion were appraised by deconvolution analysis, the approximate entropy (ApEn) statistic, and cosine regression, respectively. ANOVA revealed that continuous iv infusion of GHRH in the estrogen-withdrawn (control) milieu 1) amplified individual basal (P = 0.00011) and pulsatile (P < 10(-13)) GH secretion rates by 12- and 11-fold, respectively; 2) augmented GH secretory burst mass and amplitude each by 10-fold (P < 10(-11)), without altering GH secretory burst frequency, duration, or half-life; 3) increased the disorderliness (ApEn) of GH release patterns (P = 0.0000002); 4) elevated the mesor (cosine mean) and amplitude of the 24-h rhythm in serum GH concentrations by nearly 30-fold (both P < 10(-12)); 5) induced a phase advance in the clocktime of the GH zenith (P = 0.021); and 6) evoked a new 24-h rhythm in GH secretory burst mass with a maximum at 0018 h GH (P < 10(-3)), while damping the mesor of the 24-h rhythm in GH interpulse intervals (P < 0.025). Estradiol supplementation alone 1) increased the 24-h mean and integrated serum GH concentration (P = 0.047); 2) augmented GH secretory burst mass (P: = 0.025) without influencing pulse frequency, duration, half-life, or basal secretion; 2) stimulated more irregular patterns of GH release (higher ApEn; P = 0.012); and 3) elevated the 24-h rhythmic GH mesor (P = 0.0005), but not amplitude. Notably, combined stimulation of the GH axis with GHRH-(1--44)-amide and estradiol exerted no further effect beyond that evoked by GHRH alone, except for normalizing the acrophase of 24-h GH rhythmic release and elevating the postinfusion plasma insulin-like growth factor I concentration (P = 0.016). Unexpectedly, the two GHRH-infused serum GH concentration profiles monitored after placebo and estradiol pretreatment showed strongly nonrandom synchrony with a 20- to 30-min lag (P < 0.001). In summary, the present clinical investigations unmask a 3-fold (pulsatile, entropic, and daily rhythmic) similitude between the neuroregulatory actions of estradiol and GHRH in healthy postmenopausal women. However, GHRH infusion was multifold more effectual than estradiol, and only GHRH elevated nonpulsatile (basal) GH secretion, shifted the GH acrophase, and synchronized GH profiles. Given the nonadditive nature of the joint effects of estradiol and GHRH on pulsatile and entropic GH release, we hypothesize that estrogen amplifies GH secretion in part by enhancing endogenous GHRH release or actions. In addition, the distinctive ability of GHRH (but not estradiol) to increase basal (nonpulsatile) GH secretion, shift the GH acrophase and synchronize GH output patterns identifies certain divergent hypothalamo-pituitary actions of these two major GH secretagogues.     

Acromegaly due to ectopic growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone (GHRH) production: dynamic studies of GH and ectopic GHRH secretion

Dynamic studies of GH and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) secretion were performed in a man with a GHRH-producing carcinoid tumor and acromegaly. Insulin hypoglycemia stimulated and metoclopramide inhibited both GH and GHRH acutely. Bromocriptine suppressed GH both acutely and chronically without altering circulating GHRH levels and also blunted the GH response to exogenous GHRH. TRH acutely stimulated GH, but not GHRH, secretion, and iv bolus doses of synthetic GHRH-(1-40) stimulated GH release acutely. Somatostatin infusion decreased both GH and GHRH concentrations and blunted the GH responses to TRH and GHRH-(1-40). We conclude that prolonged exposure of the pituitary gland to high concentrations of GHRH is associated with chronic GH hypersecretion and may be accompanied by a preserved acute GH response to exogenous GHRH; a paradoxical response of GH to TRH may be mediated at the pituitary level, consequent to prolonged pituitary exposure to GHRH; bromocriptine suppression of GH in acromegaly is due to a direct pituitary effect of the drug; and somatostatin inhibits both ectopic GHRH secretion as well as GH responsiveness to GHRH in vivo. Since GH secretory responses in patients with somatotroph adenomas are similar to those in this patient, augmented GHRH secretion may play a role in development of the "classic" form of acromegaly.     

Growth hormone (GH) secretion in patients with an inactivating defect of the GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) receptor is pulsatile: evidence for a role for non-GHRH inputs into the generation of GH pulses

GH secretion is regulated by the interaction of GHRH and somatostatin and is released in 10-20 pulses in each 24-h cycle. The exact roles in pulse generation played by somatostatin, GHRH, and the recently isolated GH-releasing peptide, Ghrelin, are not fully elucidated. To investigate the GHRH-mediated GH secretion in human, we investigated pulsatile, entropic, and 24-h rhythmic GH secretion in two young adults (male, 24 yr; female, 23 yr) from a Moroccan family with a novel inactivating defect of the GHRH receptor gene. Data were compared with values in age- and gender-matched controls. Plasma GH concentration were measured by a sensitive immunofluorometric assay, with a detection limit of 0.01 mU/L. All plasma GH concentrations in the female patient were measurable; in the male patient 30 of 145 samples were at or below the detection limit. GH secretion was pulsatile, with 21 and 23 secretory episodes/24 h in the male and female patients, respectively. The fraction of basal to total GH secretion was raised in both patients by 0.18 and 0.15, respectively. The total 24-h GH production rate was greatly diminished; in the male patient it was 6.9 mU/L (normal values for his age, 26--63 mU/L), and in the female patient it was 4.2 mU/L (normal values for her age, 96--390 mU/L). The nyctohemeral plasma GH rhythm was preserved (P < 0.001), with normal acrophases (0430 and 0218 h in the male and female, respectively). Approximate entropy was greatly elevated in both subjects (0.82 in the male and 1.17 in the female; upper normal values for age and gender, 0.24 and 0.59, respectively). Intravenous injection of 50 microg GHRH failed to increase the plasma GH concentration in both patients, but 100 microg GH-releasing peptide-2 elicited a definite increase (male patient, 0.13 to 1.74 mU/L; female patient, 0.29 to 0.87 mU/L). Both patients had a partial empty sella on magnetic resonance imaging scanning. In summary, the present studies in two patients with a profound loss of function mutation of the GHRH receptor favor the view that in the human the timing of GH pulses is primarily supervised by intermittent somatostatin withdrawal, and the amplitude of GH pulses is driven by GHRH. In addition, we infer that effectual GHRH input controls the GH cell mass and the orderliness of the secretory process.     

Pulsatile secretion of growth hormone (GH) persists during continuous stimulation by CJC-1295, a long-acting GH-releasing hormone analog

CONTEXT: Pulsatile GH secretion is considered important for many of the hormone's physiological effects. Short-term GHRH infusions enhance GH pulsatility and increase IGF-I, but the short GHRH half-life limits its therapeutic use. A synthetic GHRH analog (CJC-1295) that binds permanently to endogenous albumin after injection (half-life = 8 d) stimulates GH and IGF-I secretion in several animal species and in normal human subjects and enhances growth in rats. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess GH pulsatility after a single injection of CJC-1295 and determine which GH secretion parameters correlated to the increase in IGF-I production. METHODS: GH pulsatility was assessed by 20-min blood sampling during an overnight 12-h period in healthy 20- to 40-yr-old men before and 1 wk after injection of either 60 or 90 microg/kg CJC-1295. RESULTS: GH secretion was increased after CJC-1295 administration with preserved pulsatility. The frequency and magnitude of GH secretory pulses were unaltered. However, basal (trough) GH levels were markedly increased (7.5-fold; P < 0.0001) and contributed to an overall increase in GH secretion (mean GH levels, 46%; P < 0.01) and IGF-I levels (45%; P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between the responses to the two drug doses. The IGF-I increases did not correlate with any parameters of GH secretion. CONCLUSIONS: CJC-1295 increased trough and mean GH secretion and IGF-I production with preserved GH pulsatility. The marked enhancement of trough GH levels by continuous GHRH stimulation implicates the importance of this effect on increasing IGF-I. Long-acting GHRH preparations may have clinical utility in patients with intact pituitary GH secretory capability.     

Neuroendocrine tumors secreting growth hormone-releasing hormone: Pathophysiological and clinical aspects

Hypothalamic GHRH is secreted into the portal system, binds to specific surface receptors of the somatotroph cell and elicits intracellular signals that modulate pituitary GH synthesis and/or secretion. Moreover, GHRH is synthesized and expressed in multiple extrapituitary tissues. Excessive peripheral production of GHRH by a tumor source would therefore be expected to cause somatotroph cell hyperstimulation, increased GH secretion and eventually pituitary acromegaly. Immunoreactive GHRH is present in several tumors, including carcinoid tumors, pancreatic cell tumors, small cell lung cancers, endometrial tumors, adrenal adenomas, and pheochromocytomas which have been reported to secrete GHRH. Acromegaly in these patients, however, is uncommon. The distinction of pituitary vs. extrapituitary acromegaly is extremely important in planning effective management. Regardless of the cause, GH and IGF-1 are invariably elevated and GH levels fail to suppress (<1 μg/l) after an oral glucose load in all forms of acromegaly. Dynamic pituitary tests are not helpful in distinguishing acromegalic patients with pituitary tumors from those harbouring extrapituitary tumors. Plasma GHRH levels are usually elevated in patients with peripheral GHRH-secreting tumors, and are normal or low in patients with pituitary acromegaly. Unique and unexpected clinical features in an acromegalic patient, including respiratory wheezing or dyspnea, facial flushing, peptic ulcers, or renal stones sometimes are helpful in alerting the physician to diagnosing non pituitary endocrine tumors. If no facility to measure plasma GHRH is available, and in the absence of MRI evidence of pituitary adenoma, a CT scan of the thorax and abdominal ultrasound could be performed to exclude with good approximation the possibility of an ectopic GHRH syndrome. Surgical resection of the tumor secreting ectopic GHRH should be the logical approach to a patient with ectopic GHRH syndrome. Standard chemotherapy directed at GHRH-producing carcinoid tumors is generally unsuccessful in controlling the activated GH axis. Somatostatin analogs provide an effective option for medical management of carcinoid patients, especially those with recurrent disease. In fact, long-acting somatostatin analogs may be able to control not only the ectopic hormonal secretion syndrome, but also, in some instances, tumor growth. Therefore, although cytotoxic chemotherapy, pituitary surgery, or irradiation still remain available therapeutic options, long-acting somatostatin analogs are now preferred as a second-line therapy in patients with carcinoid tumors and ectopic GHRH-syndrome.     

The GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) test in acromegaly before and after adenomectomy

The GHRH test may represent a new tool in the study of GH dynamics in acromegaly. GH responsiveness to GHRH 1-40 (50 micrograms iv) has been studied in 21 acromegalic patients. Nineteen out of 21 had active disease. Five patients were also studied 1-12 months after neurosurgery. Two apparently cured acromegalics were studied 1-2 yr after surgery. GH secretion has been evaluated in all patients by means of TRH, bromocriptine and insulin hypoglycemia tests, too. GH response to GHRH has also been performed in 14 normal subjects. In acromegaly, GH responses after GHRH (p less than 0.01 vs placebo) were variable. The GH peak ranged from 8 to 445 ng/ml in patients with active disease. Maximum GH increase after GHRH (calculated as peak/basal value ratio) was significantly reduced in acromegaly (2.9 +/- 0.5 ng/ml; mean +/- SE) in comparison to controls (34.1 +/- 10.9 ng/ml; p less than 0.01). No significant differences in GH pattern after GHRH were found between untreated and previously treated patients with active disease. A significant correlation was found between GH basal levels and GH incremental area (p less than 0.05) and between GH basal and peak levels (p less than 0.01) after GHRH. A significant increase in PRL secretion was observed in acromegalic patients after GHRH (p less than 0.01 vs placebo). No discernable variation was found in the other pituitary hormones pattern after the peptide administration. A positive correlation was observed between GH increase after GHRH and insulin hypoglycemia (p less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Failure to respond to growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) in acromegaly due to a GHRH secreting pancreatic tumor: dynamics of multiple endocrine testing

Growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) has recently been isolated and sequenced from pancreatic tumors secreting GHRH. Patients with untreated acromegaly due to a pituitary tumor respond to exogenous administration of GHRH with a further rise of their elevated basal growth hormone (GH) levels. For the first time, we report the effects of exogenously administered synthetic GHRH in a patient with acromegaly due to a GHRH secreting pancreatic tumor. The diagnosis was established by high peripheral IR-GHRH levels (1100 pg/ml) and an arterio- venous tumor gradient of IR-GHRH. In this patient GH failed to respond to 1 microgram/kg of exogenous GHRH with the pancreatic tumor in situ; however, further increase of serum GH levels occurred after TRH administration, hypoglycemia and oral glucose administration. After removal of the tumor, serum GH levels decreased and a normal response to GHRH and TRH were demonstrated. The extract of the tumor contained 1.7 micrograms IR-GHRH per g wet tissue. Thus, lack of response to exogenous GHRH in untreated acromegaly may indicate the presence of an ectopic GHRH producing tumor.     

Inhibitory effects of GHRH antagonists on human GH-secreting adenoma tissue

Experimental data indicate that antagonists of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) could be used clinically in disorders characterized by excessive GHRH/growth hormone (GH) secretion, but direct evidence for the effectiveness of GHRH antagonists on human pituitary tissue is still lacking. In this study, we investigated the inhibitory effect of our GHRH antagonists MZ-4-71 and JV-1-36 and the somatostatin (SST) analog RC-160 on superfused pituitary cells obtained from a human GH-secreting adenoma. Using Western blot analysis and immunohistochemistry, we demonstrated profuse expression of the GHRH receptor and its major splice variant SV1 and an increase in the expression of Gsa protein in the adenoma tissue. Exposure of the tumor cells to exogenous pulses of GHRH induced definite GH responses, causing a 3- to 5-fold elevation of the basal GH level. The antagonists MZ-4-71 and JV-1-36 did not alter basal GH secretion, indicating that the adenoma cells did not secrete GHRH in an autocrine manner. However, both antagonists prevented the stimulatory effect of exogenous GHRH. Similarly to the GHRH antagonists, neither SST-14 nor the SST analog RC-160 had an effect on the basal GH secretion of the tumor cells, but both peptides inhibited the stimulatory effect of exogenous GHRH, with RC-160 being more potent than SST. Our study provides direct evidence for the effectiveness of potent GHRH antagonists such as MZ-4-71 and JV-1-36 on human pituitary GH-secreting adenoma tissue and strongly suggests that these drugs could be used for therapy of GHRH-associated forms of acromegaly, particularly for those patients in whom surgery fails or is not an option.     

Pituitary-hormone secretion by thyrotropinomas

Hormone secretion by somatotropinomas, corticotropinomas and prolactinomas exhibits increased pulse frequency, basal and pulsatile secretion, accompanied by greater disorderliness. Increased concentrations of growth hormone (GH) or prolactin (PRL) are observed in about 30% of thyrotropinomas leading to acromegaly or disturbed sexual functions beyond thyrotropin (TSH)-induced hyperthyroidism. Regulation of non-TSH pituitary hormones in this context is not well understood. We there therefore evaluated TSH, GH and PRL secretion in 6 patients with up-to-date analytical and mathematical tools by 24-h blood sampling at 10-min intervals in a clinical research laboratory. The profiles were analyzed with a new deconvolution method, approximate entropy, cross-approximate entropy, cross-correlation and cosinor regression. TSH burst frequency and basal and pulsatile secretion were increased in patients compared with controls. TSH secretion patterns in patients were more irregular, but the diurnal rhythm was preserved at a higher mean with a 2.5 h phase delay. Although only one patient had clinical acromegaly, GH secretion and IGF-I levels were increased in two other patients and all three had a significant cross-correlation between the GH and TSH. PRL secretion was increased in one patient, but all patients had a significant cross-correlation with TSH and showed decreased PRL regularity. Cross-ApEn synchrony between TSH and GH did not differ between patients and controls, but TSH and PRL synchrony was reduced in patients. We conclude that TSH secretion by thyrotropinomas shares many characteristics of other pituitary hormone-secreting adenomas. In addition, abnormalities in GH and PRL secretion exist ranging from decreased (joint) regularity to overt hypersecretion, although not always clinically obvious, suggesting tumoral transformation of thyrotrope lineage cells.     

The pulsatile GH secretion in acromegaly: Hypothalamic or pituitary origin?*

OBJECTIVE: We studied the effects of different modes of octreotide therapy on the pulsatile pattern of GH release in an attempt to define better its regulation by growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin and its effects on IGF-I plasma levels in acromegaly. DESIGN: In six acromegalic patients not cured by previous treatment we compared the 24-hour GH secretion profiles under basal conditions with subcutaneous (s.c.) bolus injections of 100 micrograms octreotide every 8 hours and with continuous s.c. infusions of the same daily dose. Blood samples were taken every 10 minutes over 24 hours followed by a GHRH test (100 micrograms GHRH i.v.) with blood sampling every 15 minutes for another 2 hours. After a 4-week interval all patients were treated either by the bolus or continuous mode of octreotide application in a randomized cross-over design. On day 4 of treatment blood sampling and GHRH test were repeated. Octreotide treatment was withdrawn for another 4 weeks; all patients then received the alternate application mode and were measured under similar conditions. MEASUREMENTS: Serum GH and plasma IGF-I concentrations were analysed by serial array averaging. IGF-I levels were measured in two different assays with and without previous protein extraction. For GH pulse detection three different algorithms (Cluster, Pulsar, Desade) were applied. RESULTS: With both treatments, the initially elevated basal 24-hour mean serum GH concentrations (58.0 +/- 9.7 mU/l mean +/- SEM) decreased significantly (bolus: 11.5 +/- 4.9 mU/l, P < 0.001 vs basal; continuous infusion: 7.6 +/- 1.9 mU/l, P < 0.001 vs basal) after 4 days. GH suppression was significantly more pronounced following continuous infusion than bolus (P < 0.05). IGF-I plasma concentrations were lowered significantly (P < 0.05) with both forms of treatment which did not differ between themselves. Bolus and continuous infusion treatment significantly inhibited (P < 0.05) the amplitudes of pulsatile GH release, but did not change the pulse frequency. In two of the patients, GHRH stimulation did not increase GH serum levels suggesting a constitutive activation of adenylyl cyclase. CONCLUSION: Continuous subcutaneous octreotide treatment in acromegaly suppresses mean GH levels better than bolus injection. The number of GH pulses remains unaffected by both modes of treatment providing evidence against a somatostatinergic mechanism of pulsatile GH secretion in these patients. The unchanged frequency of pulsatile GH release in the patients unresponsive to exogenous GHRH indicates that this pattern might be independent of hypothalamic GHRH and somatostatin and suggests a pituitary-derived mechanism for GH pulse generation in acromegaly.     

Octreotide suppresses both growth hormone (GH) and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) in acromegaly due to ectopic GHRH secretion

Two patients with acromegaly secondary to ectopic GHRH secretion by metastatic carcinoid tumors were studied before and during therapy with the somatostatin analog octreotide (SMS 201-995). GH and GHRH secretory patterns were assessed during intermittent sc administration, continuous sc infusion (CSI), and continuous iv infusion of octreotide. Octreotide reduced serum GH and plasma GHRH levels in the two patients, although there was differential sensitivity of GH and GHRH. Intermittent sc therapy transiently lowered serum GH in both patients. A higher iv dose was required to reduce plasma GHRH by 50% than to reduce serum GH by 50% (2.0 vs. 0.05 micrograms/kg.h, respectively; patient 1). A similar pattern was found during CSI octreotide administration in the same patient. Chronic therapy with intermittent sc and CSI octreotide was assessed by serial 24-h profiles of GH and GHRH secretion in patient 2. Mean hourly serum GH levels decreased from a pretreatment level of 31.5 +/- 3.5 (+/- SE) to 9.5 +/- 1.5 micrograms/L during CSI therapy (1000 micrograms/day or 0.40 micrograms/kg.h). In contrast, plasma GHRH levels were less effectively suppressed. The mean serum GH levels and the variation in hourly GH values were reduced to a greater extent with CSI than with intermittent sc therapy. Serum insulin-like growth factor I also declined from 5.9 x 10(3) to 2.5 x 10(3) U/L during chronic CSI therapy (patient 2). CSI therapy with octreotide can be more effective than intermittent sc therapy in controlling GH excess in the rare syndrome of ectopic GHRH secretion, although serum GH may not decline to normal.     

Improvement of growth hormone deficiency in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism after parathyroidectomy: results of a prospective study

GH secretion is impaired in most patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHP), although the secretion of the other anterior pituitary hormones is unaffected. However, whether restoration of euparathyroidism is associated with reversal of GH deficiency in PHP patients is not known. To address this issue, we studied 30 consecutive patients with PHP due to a single parathyroid adenoma before and after parathyroidectomy. GH secretion was evaluated by peak serum GH after the maximal GHRH + arginine (Arg) stimulation test. A group of 35 age- and sex-matched normal subjects served as controls. Serum IGF-I concentration was below the normal age- corrected values in six of 30 patients before surgery and in four of 30 patients after parathyroidectomy (P = not significant). Mean serum peak GH values after the GHRH + Arg test were 17.5 +/- 2.8 micro g/liter before surgery and 23.8 +/- 2.5 micro g /liter after surgery (P = 0.0008). The GH response to the GHRH + Arg test was reduced in 20 (67%) and normal in 10 (33%) of 30 PHP patients at baseline; after surgery, 22 of 30 (73%) PHP patients had a normal GH response to the GHRH + Arg test, and only eight (27%) had an impaired GH secretion (P < 0.02). In conclusion, this study confirms that GH secretion is impaired in PHP patients and indicates that it is reversed in many patients after parathyroidectomy. Accordingly, GH deficiency in PHP patients must be considered a functional phenomenon for which GH therapy is not recommended.     

Activation of somatostatin-receptor subtype-2/-5 suppresses the mass, frequency, and irregularity of growth hormone (GH)-releasing peptide-2-stimulated GH secretion in men

Somatostatin antagonizes the stimulatory actions of GHRH and GH-releasing peptides (GHRPs). However, precisely how the inhibitory susceptibilities of the two secretagogues differ is not clear. One interpretative difficulty is that native somatostatin activates six different receptor subtypes. The present study adopts the complementary strategy of enforcing feedback inhibition via the preferential somatostatin receptor subtype 2 and 5 (SSTR-2/-5) agonist, octreotide. We postulated that putative SSTR-2/-5 agonism would unmask secretagogue-selective interactions in the control of GH secretory burst mass, frequency, and/or regularity. To this end, 10 healthy men each underwent eight randomly ordered, separate-day, fasting morning infusion sessions. Interventions comprised sc administration of octreotide (1 microg/kg), followed by bolus iv injection of saline, GHRH (1 microg/kg), GHRP-2 (1 microg/kg), or both peptides. Compared with placebo, the SSTR-2/-5 agonist reduced fasting GH concentrations from 0.27 +/- 0.07 to 0.12 +/- 0.02 microg/liter (P = 0.020), GH secretory burst mass from 2.7 +/- 0.65 to 0.55 +/- 0.11 microg/liter (P = 0.013), and basal GH secretion from 0.24 +/- 0.043 to 0.11 +/- 0.015 microg/liter.100 min (P = 0.0063). The foregoing outcomes were selective, because octreotide did not alter GH secretory burst frequency (3.1 +/- 0.5 vs. 3.3 +/- 0.21 events/3 h) or the regularity of the GH release process (approximate entropy, 0.58 +/- 0.048 vs. 0.68 +/- 0.064). In the GHRP-2-stimulated setting, presumptive SSTR-2/-5 agonism suppressed all three GH secretory burst masses, from 28 +/- 3.2 to 18 +/- 2.0 (P = 0.045); GH pulse frequency, from 3.3 +/- 0.30 to 2.0 +/- 0.18 (P = 0.0025); and the irregularity (approximate entropy) of GH release, from 0.648 +/- 0.049 to 0.433 +/- 0.047 (P < 0.01). In contrast, in the GHRH and combined GHRH/GHRP-2-stimulated contexts, octreotide decreased only GH secretory burst mass (P = 0.047). In summary, the present data indicate that GH secretory burst mass, frequency, and orderliness are subject to interactive control by at least SSTR-2/-5-dependent feedback and GHRP-dependent feedforward signals.     

GH secretion in a cohort of children with pseudohypoparathyroidism type Ia

Pseudohypoparathyroidism type Ia (PHP-Ia) is characterized by Albright's hereditary osteodistrophy (AHO) and resistance to hormones that act via the alpha subunit of the Gs protein (Gsalpha) protein, ie PTH, TSH, FSH/LH, and, as recently described in limited series, GHRH. However, the current lack of data on GHRH secretion, obesity and short stature included in the AHO phenotype hampers interpretation of GH secretory status and its effects on these subjects. We evaluated GH secretion after GHRH plus arginine (Arg) stimulus, IGF-I levels and anthropometric features in an exclusively pediatric population of 10 PHP-Ia subjects. Of our PHP-Ia children, 5 out of 10 (50%) showed impaired GH responsiveness to the provocative test, with a lower prevalence than the 75-100% previously reported. A negative correlation (p=0.024) was found between GH secretion and body mass index (BMI), whereas no correlation emerged between GH and IGF-I values (p=0.948). Height and growth velocity did not significantly differ between GH-deficient and GH-sufficient subjects. In the 5 GH-deficient patients, GHRH resistance could arguably be responsible for hormonal impairment; however, 3 of them were obese, showing normal stature and IGF-I levels: the increased BMI in these subjects could influence GH secretion and its effects. In conclusion, GH deficiency is frequent among PHP-Ia children and its prevalence is variable, two factors indicating that GH secretory testing should be part of the routine management of this patient group. It could be argued that GHRH resistance is the pathogenetic mechanism in most patients, but further studies on GHRH secretion are needed to define which values can be considered as raised. Lastly, because BMI has been indicated as a major determinant of evoked adult GH response to provocative testing, GH levels related to increased BMI also in childhood could be helpful in defining GH assessment in obese or overweight PHP-Ia children.     

Cholinergic modulation of GH secretion in acromegalic patients before and after pituitary surgery.

Cholinergic neurotransmission exerts a physiological control on GH secretion. Pirenzepine (Pz), an antagonist of muscarinic receptors, by enhancing hypothalamic somatostatin release, inhibits stimulated GH secretion in normal subjects but not in acromegalic patients. To address the hypothesis that a feedback effect of GH hypersecretion can be involved in this condition, GH responses to GHRH 1-29, 1 microgram/kg iv, with and without administration of Pz, 40 mg iv before tests, were investigated in eight acromegalic patients, before and 20-30 days after transsphenoidal adenomectomy. Pz diminished (p < 0.001) the incremental area under the curve (AUC) of GH responses to GHRH in seven normal controls. In contrast, GHRH responsiveness in untreated acromegalic patients was not affected by Pz. Postoperative basal GH levels decreased by 62.4 +/- 14.9% (p < 0.01). Pz inhibited GH responses to GHRH (p < 0.01). Furthermore, a direct relationship (r = 0.73, p < 0.01) between basal concentrations and the AUC of GH responses following Pz plus GHRH-test was found. The finding that muscarinic receptor activity recovered after the reduction of serum GH basal levels by pituitary surgery lends support to the proposed pathophysiological role of GH excess as a possible determinant factor in cholinergic-somatostatinergic dysfunction in acromegaly.     

Growth hormone does not inhibit its own secretion during prolonged hypoglycemia in man

In man, continuous infusion of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) does not sustain GH secretion, unlike prolonged hypoglycemia. To further evaluate this difference in the stimulation of GH release we measured GH concentrations for 3 h during prolonged insulin-induced hypoglycemia and GHRH-(1-29)NH2 (100 micrograms/h) infusion in normal individuals. We also assessed the GH response to combined and separate administration of insulin and GHRH. Plasma GH levels increased during prolonged hypoglycemia and remained elevated for the third hour (22-24 micrograms/L). GH concentrations increased during GHRH infusion, peaked at 60 min (23.5 micrograms/L), and rapidly declined. Thus, our findings confirmed that prolonged hypoglycemia, unlike GHRH infusion, sustained elevated GH levels and that these high levels did not appear to influence GH secretion from the pituitary. Changes in FFA did not account for the sustained GH secretion. FFA levels initially declined during insulin infusion, but after 3 h of hypoglycemia they returned to near-basal values (basal, 0.1 +/- 0.02 g/L; 180 min, 0.09 +/- 0.02). The maximal GH concentration attained during the combined insulin and GHRH test was significantly higher than that with the insulin tolerance test or GHRH test (insulin plus GHRH, 71.9 +/- 13.5; insulin tolerance test, 34.2 +/- 2.9; P less than 0.025; GHRH test, 27.9 +/- 3.2; P less than 0.02), indicating an additive effect on GH secretion. These data suggest that insulin-induced hypoglycemia stimulates GH secretion through a mechanism partly independent of GHRH. The release from somatostatin inhibition and stimulation through other neuropeptides (e.g. galanin) is suggested as possible causes of hypoglycemia-induced GH secretion.