CMV Infection in Bone Marrow and Solid Organ Transplant Patients in the Era of Antiviral Prophylaxis

Recent developments in the diagnosis and therapy of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection have helped to reduce CMV-associated morbidity and mortality following allogeneic bone marrow and solid organ transplantation. The clinical symptoms of active CMV infection and the prevalence of life-threatening CMV disease vary widely between different patient populations according to the type of transplant and the intensity of immunosuppression employed. Antiviral prophylaxis with aciclovir, valaciclovir and ganciclovir has been shown to reduce CMV infection and disease following organ transplantation. Antiviral drugs, in particular ganciclovir and foscarnet, have varying sideeffects, however, and antiviral resistance due to prolonged administration of ganciclovir and foscarnet has been reported recently. Short courses of pre-emptive antiviral therapy for documented CMV infection help to reduce the duration and sideeffects of therapy, offering an alternative strategy to antiviral prophylaxis. Studies are required to compare the efficacy and costs of antiviral prophylaxis with pre-emptive therapy.     

Incidence and characterization of cytomegalovirus resistance mutations among pediatric solid organ transplant patients who received valganciclovir prophylaxis

BackgroundDrug-resistant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections can cause significant morbidity among high-risk transplant recipients.ObjectivesThe aims of this study were to determine the incidence and clinical consequences of CMV mutations conferring ganciclovir resistance in pediatric solid organ transplant (SOT) patients who received valganciclovir oral solution or tablets for prophylaxis of CMV disease. Recombinant CMV mutants were also generated to assess the role of two UL97 mutations of unknown significance.Study designGenotypic resistance mutations and CMV viral load were sought in blood samples from pediatric SOT recipients who received valganciclovir prophylaxis for 100 days. Recombinant viruses containing novel CMV UL97 mutations were generated using a bacterial artificial chromosome containing the CMV genome to assess ganciclovir susceptibility.ResultsOverall, four known resistance UL97 mutations were observed in blood samples from 2 of 46 patients during the study with no development of CMV disease. Two UL97 changes (M615V and V466G) of unknown significance and one UL97 mutation (C603R) associated with ganciclovir resistance, but not yet confirmed by marker transfer, were also detected. Recombinant viruses containing these novel mutations were generated to assess ganciclovir susceptibility. The M615V recombinant virus was susceptible to ganciclovir while the V466G and C603R mutant viruses displayed 3.5-fold and 3.6-fold decreases in susceptibility, respectively.ConclusionsThe low incidence of ganciclovir resistance-associated mutations and the absence of clinical consequences associated with drug-resistant viruses observed in this pilot study should encourage the design of larger clinical trials aimed at evaluating the efficacy of valganciclovir prophylaxis and treatment in the pediatric setting.     

肝移植术后早期巨细胞病毒感染的先驱性治疗

目的 通过临床病例对照研究,寻求肝移植术后防治巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染的较好方法。方法 将63例原位肝移植患者分为预防性治疗组与先驱性治疗组,术后3个月内定期进行CMV-PP65定性和CMV-DNA定量检测,预防性治疗组均在术后2周时给于静脉更昔洛韦治疗,先驱性治疗组仅在检测阳性时给予更昔洛韦治疗。结果 预防性治疗组中17％(5／35)出现了CMV感染;先驱性治疗组中36％(10／28)出现了CMV感染。两组中全部病例均未发生CMV病。结论 肝移植术后早期采用先驱性治疗不增加巨细胞病毒病的发生率。     

Pharmacokinetics of ganciclovir after oral valganciclovir versus intravenous ganciclovir in allogeneic stem cell transplant patients with graft-versus-host disease of the gastrointestinal tract.

The pharmacokinetics of ganciclovir after oral valganciclovir versus intravenous ganciclovir were compared in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients with stable graft-versus-host disease of the gastrointestinal tract. Twenty-two evaluable adult patients were randomized to receive a single dose of open-label study drug (900 mg of oral valganciclovir or 5 mg/kg of intravenous ganciclovir). After a washout period of 2 to 7 days, patients were crossed over to receive the alternate study drug. Ganciclovir and valganciclovir concentrations in plasma were measured over 24 hours after dosing. Noninferiority of 900 mg of valganciclovir relative to intravenous ganciclovir was concluded if the lower limit of the 1-sided 95% confidence interval of the ratio of least-square means of the ganciclovir area under the curve (AUC) for the 2 study drugs was >80%. Valganciclovir was found to be rapidly absorbed and converted into ganciclovir. The ganciclovir exposure after 900 mg of valganciclovir noninferior to that of intravenous ganciclovir (AUC0-infinity, 52.1 and 53.8 microg.h/mL, respectively; 95% confidence interval of the ratio of least square means of AUC0-infinity, 82.48%-118.02%). Oral valganciclovir could be a useful alternative to intravenous ganciclovir in certain stable stem cell transplant patients who require prophylaxis or preemptive therapy for cytomegalovirus infection.     

Anti-cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in solid-organ transplant recipients

Ganciclovir and its prodrug, valganciclovir, are more effective than acyclovir in preventing cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease in solid-organ transplant recipients. However, the indirect effects of prophylactic use of ganciclovir and acyclovir are comparable, and the greater effectiveness of ganciclovir may be compensated for by less drug-related toxicity with acyclovir or valacyclovir. No conclusive data exist concerning the best technique and duration of surveillance for CMV infection in patients for whom active surveillance for late-onset CMV should be performed, i.e., those reaching the end of prophylaxis. Only large randomised controlled trials, with long follow-up periods, will provide definitive conclusions regarding the comparative prophylactic roles of the major antiviral agents in this population, and how their use fits with a strategy of active surveillance and pre-emptive therapy.     

Adenovirus infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: effect of ganciclovir and impact on survival.

Adenoviruses (ADV) are emerging as important causes of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In mainly non-T-cell depleted HSCT recipients, we analyzed the incidence of ADV infection, risk factors for infection, the effect of ganciclovir administered for prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV), and the impact of ADV infection on survival. The overall incidence of ADV, irrespective of the method of detection, was 8.5% (450/5233) and 12.3% (43/348) after the first or second allogeneic HSCT, and 6.3% (78/1219) and 6.5% (5/77) after the first or second autologous HSCT, respectively. The most frequent sites of infection and disease were stool and gastrointestinal tract, respectively. Statistically significant risk factors associated with ADV infections among allogeneic recipients included younger age, grade II to IV graft-versus-host disease, year of transplantation, and a second allogeneic HSCT. Furthermore, allogeneic patients seronegative for CMV at transplantation and seropositive allogeneic patients who did not receive ganciclovir, either at engraftment or as pre-emptive therapy on CMV reactivation, were at higher risk of developing ADV infections compared with seropositive patients who received ganciclovir (odds ratio=1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2 to 2.8, P=.005 and odds ratio=3.4, 95% CI 2.1 to 5.55, P<.0001, respectively). The hazard of overall mortality was higher in patients who contracted ADV compared with those who did not (hazard ratio 1.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 1.7, P<.0001). This study shows that ADV infections are associated with poor transplantation outcome in T-cell repleted HSCT recipients. Ganciclovir, given for CMV prevention, may have a protective effect. Controlled treatment and prevention studies are warranted.     

Management of allogeneic bone marrow transplant recipients at risk for cytomegalovirus disease using a surveillance bronchoscopy and prolonged pre-emptive ganciclovir therapy.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing allogeneic bone marrow transplant (BMT) are considered to be at increased risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease if they and/or their donor are CMV seropositive pre-transplant. Although several pre-emptive strategies have been shown to be effective in preventing early CMV disease, the ability of pre-emptive strategies using prolonged ganciclovir therapy to reduce the incidence of late-onset CMV infection, disease and mortality has not been fully evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of 18 weeks of pre-emptive ganciclovir therapy in preventing late-onset (> 100 days post-transplant) CMV disease when administered to asymptomatic BMT patients found to have CMV in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid obtained during a surveillance bronchoscopy approximately 35 days post-transplant. To determine whether or not survival of BMT recipients is influenced by pre-transplant donor and recipient CMV serostatus in the context of this pre-emptive ganciclovir strategy. STUDY DESIGN: Consecutive patients undergoing allogeneic BMT were assessed for their risk of developing CMV disease based on their pre-transplant CMV serostatus and that of their donor. Patients who were CMV seropositive and/or received marrow from a CMV seropositive donor underwent a surveillance bronchoscopy and BAL approximately 35 days post-transplant. Patients with positive BAL fluid for CMV received pre-emptive ganciclovir therapy for 18 weeks at decreasing dose levels. Patients considered to be at low risk for the development of CMV disease (donor and recipient CMV seronegative) were followed without intervention. RESULTS: Of 98 consecutive patients, 55 were considered to be at risk for CMV disease and underwent a surveillance bronchoscopy. Sixteen (29%) patients had a positive BAL fluid for CMV and were started on pre-emptive ganciclovir therapy. Two patients progressed and died with CMV-related pneumonia. One additional patient developed CMV-related enteritis on day 42 post-transplant and recovered with continuing ganciclovir treatment. Of the 39 patients with a negative BAL fluid for CMV, one developed a fatal CMV pneumonia 150 days post-transplant and two additional patients developed gastrointestinal CMV disease 28 and 57 days post-BMT, respectively. None of the patients in the low risk group developed CMV disease. CONCLUSIONS: The strategy utilizing a surveillance bronchoscopy for CMV and initiating prolonged (18 weeks) pre-emptive ganciclovir therapy for patients with a positive BAL fluid for CMV resulted in a low incidence of CMV-related post-transplant complications. After a minimum follow-up of 16 months, late CMV reactivations (occurring > 100 days post-transplant) were not observed in the group of individuals pre-emptively treated with ganciclovir. This observation suggests that prolonged therapy with a reduced dose of ganciclovir may be important in the prevention of CMV reactivation. The CMV serostatus of donors and recipients prior to BMT did not correlate with survival.     

Cytomegalovirus infection in paediatric haemopoietic stem cell transplantation

A retrospective audit of CMV infection was undertaken to determine prevalence and outcome in the national paediatric Haemopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) unit, with particular reference to surveillance and treatment. All patients undergoing HSCT (125 allogeneic, 50 autologous) from January 1994 to December 2004 were included. Nine underwent a second transplant for graft failure or disease recurrence. Of 134 allogeneic transplants performed, 62 were unrelated. Shell vial cultures of throat swabs and urine, and blood samples for pp65 antigenemia +/- PCR were tested weekly for a mean of 147 days post transplant. CMV negative blood products and filters were used in all. 11 rec+/donor-, 12rec-/donor+ and 10rec+/donor+ transplants were performed. All received prophylactic acyclovir, IVIG was prescribed for all but CMV -/- transplants. Initial detection of CMV was urine in 5 cases, four of whom developed antigenemia. Of ten patients who developed antigenemia, nine were treated with ganciclovir +/- foscarnet and two of these patients developed CMV pneumonitis and died. The current policy of strict surveillance, matching donor and recipient CMV status, use of CMV negative blood products and filters and pre-emptive therapy appears to be effective in controlling CMV disease/infection in the peritransplant period.     

Contemporary management of cytomegalovirus infection in transplant recipients: guidelines from an IHMF workshop, 2007

An international workshop reviewed the evidence base for deploying antiviral drugs to prevent cytomegalovirus (CMV) end-organ diseases (EOD) as well as the indirect effects of CMV in transplant recipients. Published studies demonstrate that both prophylaxis and pre-emptive therapy can be effective strategies for preventing EOD. However, the optimal drug, dosage and duration of treatment have not been defined for either prophylaxis or pre-emptive therapy and vary by transplant population. Each of these strategies presents practical challenges, including ensuring compliance with the planned management protocol. Furthermore, there is no evidence that either strategy is superior to the other. Non-randomized clinical trials suggest that late-onset disease and antiviral resistance are more problematic with prophylaxis than pre-emptive therapy, while prophylaxis more clearly controls some of the indirect effects of CMV than does pre-emptive therapy. Because of the medical importance of these indirect effects, especially graft rejection, future studies should be powered to directly address their control. Because pre-emptive therapy for CMV disease is used widely in clinical practice, the ability of newer drugs administered prophylactically to reduce the need for pre-emptive therapy is an appropriate primary endpoint for the conduct of randomized controlled trials. International agreement is required on the standard comparator drug(s) against which new drugs should be compared. For debate, we suggest that baseline pre-emptive therapy with oral valganciclovir should be the comparator for new drug evaluation because it is widely used in clinical practice in many groups of transplant patients.     

Pre-emptive oral ganciclovir can reduce the risk of cytomegalovirus disease in liver transplant recipients

A cohort of 65 liver transplant recipients was prospectively monitored with qualitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in plasma. The first 25 patients did not receive prophylaxis. From a consecutive group of 40 recipients, 11 high-risk patients donor CMV-seropositive/receptor CMV-seronegative (D+/R–), persistent CMV replication) received pre-emptive oral ganciclovir (1000 mg three times daily), when a marker of risk was identified, until day 90. The overall incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease at six months was 20% (five of 25 patients) in the non-prophylaxis group and 2.5% (one of 40 patients) in the group treated with pre-emptive oral ganciclovir (relative risk, 0.11; 95% confidence interval; 0.01–0.96; P  = 0.04). The PCR sensitivity for detecting CMV disease was 80%, the specificity was 90%, and the positive and negative predictive values were 66% and 95%, respectively. Adverse events, graft rejection and survival were similar between groups. We conclude that pre-emptive oral ganciclovir in high-risk patients can reduce the risk of CMV disease.     

Prospective long-term study on primary CMV infections in adult liver transplant (D+/R−) patients after valganciclovir prophylaxis

BackgroundCytomegalovirus (CMV) can cause severe infections in transplanted patients. To prevent CMV infection, most liver centers use prophylaxis for CMV-seronegative recipients receiving an organ from a seropositive donor (D+/R−). Valganciclovir is mostly given for 3–6 months after transplantation. However, the patients may develop primary CMV infection after the cessation of prophylaxis and late-onset CMV disease may occur.ObjectivesA prospective long-term follow-up of CMV (D+/R−) adult liver transplant recipients after 3 months valganciclovir prophylaxis was investigated.Study designOf 154 consecutive adult liver recipients transplanted from 2006 to 2009, 20 (13%) were CMV D+/R− and received antiviral prophylaxis up to 3 months after transplantation. After excluding the recipients with incomplete prophylaxis or monitoring, 13 (D+/R−) patients with follow-up of >4 years after the 3-month period of valganciclovir prophylaxis were included in the study.The patients were monitored for CMV by real-time quantitative plasma PCR.ResultsNo break-through CMV infections were recorded during the prophylaxis period. After cessation of valganciclovir prophylaxis 12/13 (90%) patients demonstrated CMV-DNAemia following a post transplantation mean interval of 165 days (range 95–320). Ten patients with high viral loads (peak viral load mean 81,510, range 1900–648950 cps/ml) were successfully treated, 6 with valganciclovir, and 4 with ganciclovir. Two patients with low level CMV-DNAemia (<1000 cps/ml) were asymptomatic and not treated. No intragraft infection was seen, but one patient developed gastrointestinal CMV infection verified from ileum biopsy. During long-term follow-up, 3 patients demonstrated low-level viral replication, but no symptomatic recurrences occurred. One patient died of bacterial sepsis, but no patient or graft was lost due to CMV.ConclusionsPrimary CMV infections after cessation of prophylaxis were common, but were successfully treated with valganciclovir or ganciclovir.     

Systematic review of ganciclovir pharmacodynamics during the prevention of cytomegalovirus infection in adult solid organ transplant recipients

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) represents the most common infection among recipients of solid organ transplants (SOTs). Previous meta‐analysis showed 0.8% of SOT recipients developed CMV disease whilst receiving valganciclovir (ValGCV) prophylaxis. However, the clinical utility of monitoring ganciclovir (GCV) blood concentrations is unclear. We systematically reviewed the association between GCV concentrations during prophylaxis and the incidence of CMV. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for studies between 1946 and 2018, where GCV pharmacokinetics and incidence of CMV viraemia or disease in SOT were available. Research designs included randomised trials, comparative, prospective cohort, retrospective, or case report studies. Only human adult studies were included, with English language restriction. The 11 studies that met the eligibility criteria included 610 participants receiving GCV or ValGCV prophylaxis. Quality assessment showed 2/4 randomised trials, 4/6 cohort studies, and 1/1 case report were of high quality. Despite dose adjustments for renal impairment, mean GCV exposures for patients were heterogeneous and ranged between 28 and 53.7 μg·h/mL across three randomised trials. The incidence of CMV infection and disease ranged from 0% to 50% and 0% to 3.1%, respectively, with follow up between 3 to 9 months. One study showed statistical power in determining relationship, where GCV exposure at 40 to 50 μg·h/mL in high‐risk SOT recipients was associated with a reduced risk of viraemia. Clinical monitoring for GCV exposure can be applied to high‐risk SOT recipients during ValGCV prophylaxis; however, further studies are needed to determine the utility of monitoring in all SOT recipients.     

Ganciclovir inhibits lymphocyte proliferation by impairing DNA synthesis.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease-related mortality in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients has dramatically declined because of ganciclovir prophylaxis and preemptive therapeutic strategies. However, ganciclovir has not improved overall survival in randomized studies despite effectively preventing overt CMV disease. Moreover, recurrent posttransplant CMV antigenemia, associated with prolonged ganciclovir exposure, is a predictor of increased relapse of malignancy. We examined the hypothesis that ganciclovir itself may have a negative impact on immune reconstitution by testing the effect of ganciclovir on normal human lymphocytes in vitro. T-lymphocyte activation and proliferation, as measured by PHA-induced (3)H-thymidine uptake, was greatly reduced at therapeutic concentrations of ganciclovir (10 microg/mL) but not for foscarnet (300 microM/L). Moreover, ganciclovir impaired bromodeoxyuridine incorporation in proliferating lymphocytes, but did not impair lymphocyte survival or induce lymphocyte apoptosis. Collectively, these results show that ganciclovir suppresses T-lymphocyte proliferation in vitro by inhibiting DNA synthesis; with implications for T-lymphocyte function following allogeneic BMT.     

Analysis of cytomegalovirus DNA polymerase (UL54) mutations in solid organ transplant patients receiving valganciclovir or ganciclovir prophylaxis

We previously reported the absence of CMV UL97 (kinase) gene resistance mutations up to 12 months post-transplant following 100 days of valganciclovir prophylaxis, and a low incidence of resistance mutations following 100 days of oral ganciclovir prophylaxis in a prospective multicenter study in solid organ transplant recipients excluding lung transplants. Herein, we report UL54 (DNA polymerase) gene sequencing results for all patients with previous UL97 PCR-positive samples (n = 99) in our study. One UL54 resistance mutation (L545S known to confer ganciclovir and cidofovir resistance) was detected in a routine day-100 sample from an asymptomatic patient who received oral ganciclovir. Notably, this CMV UL54 mutation occurred in the absence of a UL97 mutation. Additionally, new UL54 variants were observed. Thus, emergence of CMV UL54 mutations in the absence of UL97 mutations is a rare but possible event that is not necessarily associated with detrimental clinical outcome in solid organ transplant recipients.     

A comparative randomised study of valacyclovir vs. oral ganciclovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in renal transplant recipients

An open, prospective, randomised study was conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of valacyclovir vs. oral ganciclovir for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in renal transplant recipients. Eighty-three renal transplant recipients were assigned randomly to receive valacyclovir (n=43) or oral ganciclovir (n=40) for the first 3 months after transplantation. Both groups were similar in terms of demographics, primary renal disease, graft source, HLA matching, immunosuppressive therapy and donor-recipient CMV antibody status. CMV infection was diagnosed by detection of virus DNA in plasma with the Amplicor CMV Test. CMV disease was observed in only one patient belonging to the ganciclovir group, who developed enterocolitis 6 months post-transplantation. No difference was observed between the two treatment groups with respect to detection of CMV DNA, virus infections other than CMV, acute rejection episodes, and serum creatinine levels at 3 and 6 months following transplantation. An increased number of bacterial infections was noted in the ganciclovir group (p 0.003). No adverse reactions with either treatment were reported. The estimated cost of valacyclovir treatment was 20% higher than that of ganciclovir treatment. Overall, both valacyclovir and oral ganciclovir were found to be effective and safe for CMV prophylaxis in renal transplant recipients. Decisions regarding prophylactic regimens should include additional criteria, such as cost or possible development of resistance.     

Clinical and economic burden of pre-emptive therapy of cytomegalovirus infection in hospitalized allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a major complication after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). We conducted a retrospective study to determine the clinical and economic burden of pre-emptive therapy (PET) for CMV infection in 100 consecutive hospitalized adult CMV positive serostatus allo-HCT recipients and compared their hospitalization cost with allo-HCT recipients hospitalized with graft vs host disease without CMV infection (control group) and across 19 US cancer centers for hospitalized patients with CMV infection between 2012 and 2015 (Vizient database). A total of 192 CMV episodes of PET for CMV infection occurred within 1 year post-HCT. PET consisted of ganciclovir (41% of episodes), foscarnet (40%), and valganciclovir (38%) with the longest average length of stay in foscarnet-treated patients (41 days). The average direct cost per patient admitted for PET was $116 976 (range: $7866-$641 841) compared with $12 496 (range: $2004-$43 069) in the control group (P < .0001). The total direct cost per encounter was significantly higher in patients treated with foscarnet and had nephrotoxicity ($284 006) compared with those who did not ($112 195). The average cost amongst the 19 US cancer centers, including our institution, was $42 327 with major disparities in cost and clinical outcomes. PET for CMV infection is associated with high economic burden in allo-HCT recipients.     

Comparative clinical manifestations and immune effects of cytomegalovirus infections following distinct types of immunosuppression

BackgroundCytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a well-recognised complication of solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplantation. However, CMV infection also occurs in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection, previously immunocompetent intensive care unit patients, and individuals on immunosuppressive medications for various underlying diseases.ObjectivesThis review describes the comparative effects of CMV infection in distinct types of acquired immunosuppression.SourcesSelected peer-reviewed publications on CMV infections published until December 2021.ContentCMV infection affects various organ systems through direct cytolytic mechanisms but may also exert indirect effects by promoting pro-inflammatory and immunosuppressive responses. This has been well studied in transplant recipients, for whom antiviral prophylaxis and pre-emptive therapy have now become standard practice. These strategies not only prevent direct CMV disease manifestations but also mitigate various immunopathological processes to reduce graft-vs.-host disease, graft rejection, and the occurrence of secondary bacterial and fungal infections. The efficacy of neither prophylactic nor pre-emptive treatment of CMV infection has been demonstrated for patients with critical illness- or medication-induced immunosuppression. Many observational studies have shown an independent association between CMV reactivation and a prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation or increased mortality in the intensive care unit. Furthermore, data suggest that CMV reactivation may increase pulmonary inflammation and prolong the duration of mechanical ventilation.ImplicationsA large number of observational and experimental studies suggest attributable morbidity and mortality related to CMV infection, not only in transplant recipients and patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection but also in patients with critically illness- or medication-induced immunosuppression. Adequately powered randomised controlled trials investigating the efficacy of prophylaxis or pre-emptive treatment of CMV infection in these patients are lacking, with a notable exception for transplant recipients.     

Monitoring human cytomegalovirus infection in transplant recipients.

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection remains one of the most challenging infectious complications in both solid organ transplant (SOT) and hemopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients. In the last two decades advances have been made in the diagnosis and monitoring of HCMV infection in SOT and HSCT recipients following introduction of quantitative assays such as rapid virus isolation in blood (viremia), quantitation of pp65 in peripheral blood leukocytes (antigenemia), and quantitation of viral genome in blood (DNAemia). The availability of these rapid diagnostic assays has allowed treatment administration during the presymptomatic phase of HCMV infection (preemptive treatment) and greatly reduced HCMV-related morbidity and mortality, particularly among HSCT recipients. Definition of clinically validated thresholds for initiating preemptive treatment in SOT and HSCT recipients is a major goal in the transplantation setting. With respect to universal prophylaxis of HCMV infection in transplant recipients, the preemptive treatment approach shows advantages in (i) treating a lower number of patients for shorter periods of time and (ii) avoiding the reported emergence of HCMV disease after interruption of anti-HCMV prophylaxis. To understand the mechanism behind long-term control of HCMV infection in transplant recipients, the HCMV-specific T-cell response must be evaluated.     

Clinical aspects of CMV infection after stem cell transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is one of the most important infectious complications after stem cell transplantation (SCT). Major improvements in the management of CMV infection have been achieved during the last decade, including the introduction of safe blood product support for CMV-seronegative patients, the development of early pre-emptive antiviral therapy based on sensitive diagnostic tests, and antiviral prophylaxis. With the better control of CMV infection during the first 100 days after allogeneic SCT an increase in the incidence of CMV infection and disease after day 100 after transplantation was observed. New methods that allow for the reconstitution of CMV-specific immune responses such as adoptive T-cell therapy are promising tools that might help to improve the management of late CMV infection and disease.