Visual evoked potentials during thiopentone-fentanylnitrous oxide anaesthesia in humans

Visual evoked potentials (VEP) during thiopentone-fentanylnitrous oxide anaesthesia were studied in 15 healthy patients undergoing non-neurosurgical procedures. The VEP was recorded before and at 1 and 2 min after induction of anaesthesia with 5–6 mg · kg⁻¹ of thiopentone. After recording the 1 and 2 min VEPs, anaesthesia was maintained with a fentanylnitrous oxideoxygen combination, and further recordings were made at 5, 10, 15 and 20 min after induction. The 1 and 2 min VEPs showed a marked decrease in the amplitudes. Latencies were increased. The amplitudes gradually returned to the control level at 15 min, while the latencies remained increased throughout the study period. In conclusion, thiopentone should be avoided during the critical period of VEP recording. Once it is given, at least 15 min should elapse before an appropriate interpretation of the VEP can be made. Thiopentonefentanylnitrous oxide anaesthesia slightly increases the latencies of the VEP. These effects should be considered in the interpretation of the VEP when thiopentone-fentanylnitrous oxide anaesthesia is used. Nous avons enregistré les potentiels évoqués visuels (PEV) de 15 patients anesthésiés au thiopental-fentanyl-protoxyde d’azote pendant une intervention non neurochirurgicale. Les mesures avaient lieu une et deux minutes après l’injection de 5–6 mg · kg⁻¹ de thiopental puis sous fentanyl et protoxyde d’azote 5, 10, 15 et 20 minutes après l’induction. A une et deux minutes, les PEV avaient une période de latence prolongée et une amplitude réduite. Cette dernière revint progressivement à la normale au bout de 15 minutes mais la période de latence demeura allongée jusqu’ à la fin de l’étude. Ainsi, le thiopental interfère avec l’interprétation des PEV et cet effet dure au moins 15 minutes. L’anesthésie au thiopental-fentanyl-protoxyde d’azote prolonge aussi légèrement la période de latence des PEV. On devra tenir compte de ces effets dans l’ interprétation des PEV.

---

Presented in part at the American Electroencephalographic Society’s annual meeting, San Diego, CA, October 1988.     

Exposure of operating room personnel to nitrous oxide during paediatric anaesthesia

This study was undertaken to quantify the exposure of operating room staff to nitrous oxide during routine paediatric otolaryngeal surgery and to determine the influence of the method of induction of anaesthesia on this exposure. The nitrous oxide exposure of the anaesthetist, the surgeon and the circulating nurse were measured, using body-worn passive atmospheric samplers, during twelve routine paediatric otolaryngeal surgical lists. During six of the lists an inhalational technique, with nitrous oxide, oxygen and halothane, was used for the induction of anaesthesia. During the other six lists anaesthesia was induced using intravenous thiopentone. In all cases, anaesthesia was maintained using nitrous oxide, oxygen and halothane. Regardless of the induction technique used, the mean nitrous oxide exposures of the anaesthetist, the surgeon and the nurse all exceeded the maximum level of 25 ppm.hr-1 recommended by the United States National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). The use of an intravenous technique for the induction of anaesthesia reduced the nitrous oxide exposure of the anaesthetist and the circulating nurse. This suggests that, although the use of an intravenous induction may reduce exposure to nitrous oxide, the NIOSH recommendations for maximum exposure of operating room personnel to nitrous oxide are currently unattainable in practice.     

Systemic lidocaine and human somatosensoryevoked potentials during sufentanil-isoflurane anaesthesia

The effect of systemically administered lidocaine on somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) during general anaesthesia has not been widely reported. Knowledge of the influence of anaesthetic agents on evoked potentials assists in interpreting evoked potential waveforms. Accordingly, we studied the behaviour of cortical and subcortical (recorded at the second cervical vertebra) SSEPs after administration of intravenous lidocaine (3 mg.kg-1 bolus followed by infusion at 4 mg.kg-1.hr-1) during a sufentanil-based anaesthetic regimen in 16 patients undergoing abdominal or orthopaedic surgery. When compared to awake baseline recordings, the sufentanil-nitrous oxide, low-dose isoflurane anaesthetic depressed N1 amplitude by approximately 40% and prolonged latency by 10%. Fifteen minutes after establishment of this anaesthetic, the amplitude and latency of N1 were 1.13 +/- 0.56 microV and 19.81 +/- 1.63 msec, respectively. Within five minutes of adding lidocaine, amplitude decreased further to 0.84 +/- 0.39 microV (P = 0.001), while latency was extended to 20.44 +/- 1.48 msec (P = 0.01). Lidocaine did not affect cervical amplitude and prolonged latency only minimally. Despite the observed effects on amplitude and latency, SSEP waveforms were preserved and interpretable. Plasma lidocaine levels obtained at 5, 20, and 40 minutes after lidocaine were 5.17 +/- 1.33, 3.76 +/- 1.14, and 3.66 +/- 0.9 micrograms.dl-1, respectively. Our results indicate that systemically administered lidocaine at therapeutic plasma levels acts synergistically with a sufentanil-based anaesthetic to depress the amplitude and prolong the latency of SSEPs.     

Neuromuscular and cardiovascular effects of mivacurium chloride in surgical patients receiving nitrous oxide-narcotic or nitrous oxide-isoflurane anaesthesia

The neuromuscular and cardiovascular effects of mivacurium chloride were studied during nitrous oxide-oxygen narcotic (fentanyl) (n = 90) and nitrous oxide-oxygen isoflurane (ISO) anaesthesia (n = 45). In addition, a separate group (n = 9) received succinylcholine during fentanyl anaesthesia to compare its neuromuscular effects with mivacurium. Mivacurium was initially administered as a single bolus in doses from 0.03 mg.kg-1 to 0.25 mg.kg-1 to study the dose-response relationships, as well as the cardiovascular effects of mivacurium. Neuromuscular block (NMB) was measured by recording the twitch response of the adductor pollicis muscle following ulnar nerve stimulation (0.15 Hz, 0.2 ms supramaximal voltage). The ED95 values for mivacurium were estimated to be 0.073 mg.kg-1 and 0.053 mg.kg-1 in the fentanyl and ISO groups respectively. The duration of block (time from injection to 95 per cent recovery) for a dose of 0.05 mg.kg-1 mivacurium was 15.3 +/- 1.0 min and 21.5 +/- 1.3 min for fentanyl and ISO anaesthesia, respectively. The recovery index (25-75 per cent) between initial bolus dose (6.1 +/- 0.5 min), repeat bolus doses (7.6 +/- 0.6 min), mivacurium infusion (6.7 +/- 0.7 min) and succinylcholine infusion (6.8 +/- 1.8 min) were not significantly different. There was minimal change in mean arterial pressure (MAP) or heart rate (HR) following bolus doses of mivacurium up to 0.15 mg.kg-1. Bolus administration of 0.20 mg.kg-1 or 0.25 mg.kg-1 of mivacurium decreased MAP from 78.2 +/- 2.5 to 64.0 +/- 3.2 mmHg (range 12-59 per cent of control) (P less than 0.05). The same doses when administered slowly over 30 sec produced minimal change in MAP or HR.     

Butorphanol compared with fentanyl in general anaesthesia for ambulatory laparoscopy

Butorphanol was compared with fentanyl as the narcotic component of general anaesthesia for ambulatory laparoscopic surgery. This double-blind, randomized study enrolled 60 healthy women who received equianalgesic doses of fentanyl 1 microgram.kg-1 (F, n = 30) or butorphanol 20 micrograms.kg-1 (B, n = 30) prior to induction of anaesthesia. Tracheal anaesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide/oxygen, isoflurane, and succinylcholine by infusion. Intraoperatively, patients who received B demonstrated lower pulse rate before and after intubation (P less than 0.05, P less than 0.01) and lower diastolic blood pressure after intubation (P less than 0.01). Anesthesiologists judged the maintenance phase as satisfactory more often with B (P less than 0.05). Postoperatively, there were no differences in analgesic need. No major side-effects occurred in either group. Among minor side-effects, patients who received B reported postoperative sedation more often, 77% vs 37% (P less than 0.01), which occurred during the first 45 min of recovery (P less than 0.05). Discharge times were not different. On the first postoperative day, more subjects who received B were satisfied with their anaesthesia experience (P less than 0.05). Butorphanol 20 micrograms.kg-1 is an acceptable alternative analgesic in general anaesthesia for ambulatory laparoscopy.     

Recall of intraoperative events after general anaesthesia and cardiopulmonary bypass

We wished to identify patients able to recall intraoperative events after general anaesthesia involving cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). A balanced anaesthetic technique consisting of benzodiazepines, low dose fentanyl (15.9 ± 8.5 μg· kg^{− 1}) and a volatile agent was employed. Perioperative recall was sought utilizing a structured interview on the fourth or fifth postoperative day. During 20 mo 837 patients underwent CPB. Seven hundred patients (84%) were able to respond to a structured postoperative interview. A detailed chart review was performed in patients with recall and in 60 randomly selected patients without recall. Eight patients (1.14%) reported recall of intraoperative events. We were unable to identify any differences between the two groups with respect to narcotic, benzodiazepine dosage or usage of inhalational agents. The incidence of recall in patients undergoing cardiac surgery was less in our group than previously reported. It is, however, higher than the 0.2% incidence recently reported in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. This is probably due to patient characteristics and intraoperative factors which make it difficult to avoid periods of relatively light anaesthesia during cardiac surgery. L’objectif de ce travail est d’identifier les patients capables de se rappeler des événements survenus pendant la chirurgie sous circulation extracorporelle (CEC). L’anesthésie consiste en des benzodiazépines, du fentanyl à faibles doses (15,9 ± 8,5 μg· kg^{− 1}), et un agent volatile. On recherche la mémoire évocative périopératoire lors d’une interview au quatrième ou cinquième jour postopératoire. Sur une période de 20 mois, 837 patients ont subi une CEC. De ceux-ci, 700 (84%) sont capables de répondre à une interview postopératoire. Une révision du dossier d’anesthésie est effectuée chez les patients avec mémoire évocative et chez 60 patients sans mémoire évocative. Huit patients (1,14%) se rappellent certains événements périopératoires. Il n’y a pas de différence entre les deux groupes au regard de la posologie opiacée, des benzodiazépines ou de la concentration anesthésique. L’incidence de la mémoire évocative chez nos patients de chirurgie cardiaque est moindre que celle d’études antérieures. Elle est toutefois plus élevée que l’incidence de 0,2% récemment rapportée chez des patients de chirurgie autre que cardiaque. Selon toute probabilité, cette différence est due aux caractéristiques des malades et à des facteurs peropératoires qui ne permettent pas d’éviter pendant la chirurgie cardiaque des périodes d’anesthésie légère.

---

Presented in part at the Canadian Anaesthetists’ Society 49th Annual Meeting in Toronto, June 1992.     

A clinical assessment of desflurane anaesthesia and comparison with isoflurane

In 48 randomly assigned ASA I adult patients undergoing elective orthopaedic procedures, we compared the pharmacodynamics of desflurane (DF) and isoflurane (IF), and their pharmacokinetics during rapid induction of deep anaesthesia (via face mask, to 1.5–2 MAC, after thiopentone), maintenance of anaesthesia at 1.25 MAC, and emergence therefrom. During induction, laryngeal reactions ranging from mild crowing to laryngospasm occurred more frequently with DF than with IF (15/24 DF, 5/24 IF; P < 0.05) and was more severe (9/ 24 DF, 1/24 IF, excluding the mildest form, P < 0.05). As a result, induction of anaesthesia was not accomplished faster with DF, in spite of a faster equilibration between exhaled and inhaled concentrations. Emergence from DF was more rapid and less complicated by delirium. Pharmacokinetically, the exhaled concentration of DF reached 90% of the inhaled concentration within five minutes of induction, whereas that of IF lagged behind and remained 25% below the inhaled concentration (1 vs 1.34 ± 0.05) even one hour after induction. Premature ventricular contractions did not occur in any patient even during periods of difficulty with the airway and oxygen desaturation. It is concluded that DF is a safe anaesthetic, pharmacokinetically superior to IF but clinically inferior for induction of anaesthesia via a face mask. Because of the fast equilibration, the exhaled concentration of DF can be controlled more precisely by the dial setting of the vaporiser.     

Propofol anaesthesia reduces early post-operative emesis after paediatric strabismus surgery

Propofol anaesthesia may reduce postoperative emesis. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of emesis after propofol anaesthesia with and without nitrous oxide, compared with thiopentone and halothane anaesthesia, in hospital and up to 24 hr postoperatively, in outpatient paediatric patients after strabismus surgery. Seventy-five ASA class I or II, unpremedicated patients, aged 2–12 yr were randomly assigned to one of three groups: Thiopentone, 6.0 mg · kg^{? 1} iv induction followed by halothane and N₂O/O₂ for maintenance (T/H); propofol for induction, followed by propofol and oxygen for maintenance (P/O₂); and propofol for iv induction, followed by propofol infusion and N₂O/O₂ for maintenance (P/N₂O). All received vecuronium, controlled ventilation, and acetaminophen pr. Morphine was given as needed for postoperative analgesia. There were no differences in age, weight, number of eye muscles operated upon, duration of anaesthesia or surgery. The P/N₂O group (255 ± 80 μg· kg^{? 1}· min^{? 1}) received less propofol than the P/O₂ group (344 ± 60 μg · kg^{? 1}· min^{? 1}) (P ≤ 0.0001) and had shorter extubation (P < 0.001) and recovery (P < 0.01) times. Emesis in the hospital, in both the P/N₂O (4.0%) and P/O₂ group (4.0%) was less than in the T/H group (32%) (P < 0.01). Antiemetics were required in four patients in the T/H group (16.0%). Overall emesis after surgery was not different among the groups: T/H (48%), P/O₂ (28%) and P/N₂O (42%). The use of propofol anaesthesia with and without N₂O decreased only early emesis. This supports the concept of a short-acting, specific antiemetic effect of propofol.     

Regional anaesthesia for hernia repair in children: local vs caudal anaesthesia

The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of local anaesthesia (LA) with that of caudal anaesthesia (CA) on postoperative care of children undergoing inguinal hernia repair. This was a randomized, single-blind investigation of 202 children aged 1–13 yr. Anaesthesia was induced with N₂O/O₂ and halothane or propofol and maintained with N₂O/O₂/halothane. Local anaesthesia included ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block plus subcutaneous injection by the surgeon of up to 0.3 ml · kg^?1 bupivacaine 0.25% with 5 μg · kg^?1 adrenaline. The dose for caudal anaesthesia was 1 ml · kg^?1 up to 20 ml bupivacaine 0.2% with 5 μg · kg^?1 adrenaline. Postoperative pain was assessed with mCHEOPS in the anaesthesia recovery room, with postoperative usage of opioid and acetaminophen in the hospital, and with parental assessment of pain with a VAS. Vomiting, time to first ambulation and first urination were recorded. The postoperative pain scores and opioid usage were similar; however, the LA-group required more acetaminophen in the Day Care Surgical Unit. The incidence of vomiting and the times to first ambulation and first urination were similar. The LA-patients had a shorter recovery room stay (40 ± 9 vs 45 ± 15 min, P < 0.02). The postoperative stay was prolonged in the CA group (176 ± 32 vs 165 ± 26 min, P = 0.02). We conclude that LA and CA have similar effects on postoperative care with only slight differences.     

Randomized comparison of outcome after propofol-nitrous oxide or enflurane-nitrous oxide anaesthesia in operations of long duration

A randomized, prospective, comparative study was performed to evaluate induction characteristics, haemodynamic changes and recovery in 60 ASA I-II patients undergoing mainly gynaecological laparotomies with either propofol or thiopentone-enflurane anaesthesia. The propofol group (n = 30) received 2 mg.kg-1 propofol for induction of anaesthesia followed by propofol infusion. The thiopentone-enflurane group (n = 30) received thiopentone 4 mg.kg-1 for induction followed by enflurane (0.5-2 per cent). All patients received nitrous oxide (66 per cent] in oxygen begun one minute after tracheal intubation, and fentanyl (1.5 micrograms.kg-1) four minutes prior to induction. Other drugs administered during or after anaesthesia were similar among the groups. Haemodynamic measurements were similar between propofol and enflurane groups except after tracheal intubation when the mean arterial pressure was lower in the propofol group (P less than 0.05). The propofol group had significantly less (P less than 0.01) emesis in the recovery room than the enflurane group. The propofol group experienced significantly less (P less than 0.05) dizziness, depression/sadness and hunger than the enflurane group in the postoperative period as assessed with a visual analogue questionnaire. We conclude that propofol provided better outcome than enflurane in terms of these nonvital but annoying outcome measures after relatively long intra-abdominal operations.     

A comparison of spinal and epidural anaesthesia for hip arthroplasty

Spinal and epidural anaesthesia were compared in 65 patients undergoing hip arthroplasty, with regard to the degree of sensory and motor blockade, cardiovascular effects, operating conditions, the dose of propofol required to produce satisfactory hypnosis, and complications. Epidural anaesthesia was successful in 30 patients using an initial dose of 15 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine, and spinal anaesthesia in 32 patients, using 4 ml 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine. The two techniques were similar with regard to the level of sensory blockade (T8), degree of hypotension and perioperative haemorrhage. Differences occurred in the degree of motor blockade (mean Bromage score of 1 in the spinal group vs 3.86 in the epidural group) (P less than 0.05), time to achieve maximal cephalad spread (13 min in the spinal group vs 21 min in the epidural group) (P less than 0.05) and the dose of propofol required to produce adequate hypnosis (1.95 mg.kg-1.hr-1 in the spinal group vs 2.89 mg.kg-1.hr-1 in the epidural group) (P less than 0.05). Only seven patients required urethral catheterization in this spinal group compared with 14 in the epidural group (P less than 0.05). Spinal anaesthesia also proved advantageous by providing better operating conditions for the surgeon, with a lower incidence of patient movement.     

A comparison of the myocardial metabolic and haemodynamic changes produced by propofol-sufentanil and enflurane-sufentanil anaesthesia for patients having coronary artery bypass graft surgery

The purpose of this study was to compare propofol-sufentanil with enflurane-sufentanil anaesthesia for patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery with respect to changes in (1) haemodynamic variables; (2) myocardial blood flow and metabolism; (3) serum cortisol, triglyceride, lipoprotein concentrations and liver function; and (4) recovery characteristics. Forty-seven patients with preserved ventricular function (ejection fraction greater than 40%, left ventricular end diastolic pressure less than or equal to 16 mmHg) were studied. Patients in Group A (n = 24) received sufentanil 0.2 microgram.kg-1 and propofol 1-2 mg.kg-1 for induction of anaesthesia which was maintained with a variable rate propofol (50-200 micrograms.kg-1.min-1) infusion and supplemental sufentanil (maximum total 5 micrograms.kg-1). Patients in Group B (n = 23) received sufentanil 5 micrograms.kg-1 for induction of anaesthesia which was maintained with enflurane and supplemental sufentanil (maximum total 7 micrograms.kg-1). Haemodynamic and myocardial metabolic profiles were determined at the awake-sedated, post-induction, post-intubation, first skin incision, post-sternotomy, and pre-cardiopulmonary bypass intervals. Induction of anaesthesia produced a larger reduction in systolic blood pressure in Group A (156 +/- 22 to 104 +/- 20 mmHg vs 152 +/- 26 to 124 +/- 24 mmHg; P less than 0.05). No statistical differences were detected at any other time or in any other variable including myocardial lactate production (n = 13 events in each group), time to tracheal extubation and time to discharge from the ICU. We concluded that, apart from hypotension on induction of anaesthesia, propofol-sufentanil anaesthesia produced anaesthetic conditions equivalent to enflurane-sufentanil anaesthesia for CABG surgery.     

Comparison of perioperative mental function after general anaesthesia and spinal anaesthesia with intravenous sedation

This study compared the postoperative mental function in 44 elderly patients following general anaesthesia (GA) or spinal anaesthesia (SA) with sedation for transurethral resection of prostate. The Mini-Mental State (MMS) was done preoperatively and postoperatively at six hours, one day, three days, five days and one month. The geriatric mental status examination was performed preoperatively and one month after the anaesthetic. There was no significant intergroup difference in the MMS score in the preoperative, six hours, one day, three days, five days and 30 days postoperative scores between the GA and SA with sedation groups. A significant intragroup difference between preoperative and postoperative MMS score was detected in the GA group (P less than 0.02) and in the SA group with sedation (P less than 0.03). In the GA group, the significant decrease in MMS score occurred at 6 h postoperatively (P less than 0.002) whereas in the SA group with sedation, MMS score also decreased significantly at 6 h (P less than 0.005). In conclusion, there was no significant difference in perioperative mental function between the general and spinal anaesthetic groups when supplemental IV sedation was given. In both groups, perioperative mental function decreased significantly at 6 h postoperatively.     

Delayed awakening from general anaesthesia in a patient with Hunter syndrome

Hunter syndrome is one of a heterogeneous group of recessively inherited mucopolysaccharide storage diseases (MPS) with similar biochemical defects manifested by impairments in muco-polysaccharide catabolism with variable but progressive clinical courses. Abnormal accumulation and deposition of mucopoly-saccharides in the tissues of several organs lead to numerous anatomical, musculoskeletal and neurological abnormalities which are known to complicate anaesthetic and airway management. Hunter syndrome has a wide variance of clinical phenotypes ranging from mild to severe. We present a patient having physical and neurological features consistent with a severe clinical presentation of Hunter syndrome (MPS, Type II). Following a seemingly uneventful intraoperative anaesthetic course including isoflurane, nitrous oxide and fentanyl (0.93 μg · kg⁻¹), resumption of spontaneous ventilation and return to consciousness were delayed until intravenous naloxone (200 μg) was administered 100 min after the opioid administration. The cause of delayed recovery from anaesthesia in this patient is unknown. La maladie de Hunter fait partie du groupe des affections hétérogènes héréditaires et récessives des mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) avec lesquelles elle partage les mêmes anomalies biochimiques. Celles-ci se manifestent par des altérations du catabolisme des mucopolysaccharides et une évolution variable et progressive. L’accumulation anormale de mucopolysaccharides dans les tissus de plusieurs organes provoque de nombreuses lésions musculo-squelettiques et neurologiques qui compliquent la gestion de l’anesthésie et des voies aériennes. Les phénotypes cliniques de la maladie de Hunter varient de légers à graves. Cette observation porte sur un patient qui présente des manifestations cliniques graves de la maladie de Hunter (MPS type II). A la suite d’une anesthésie sans problèmes réalisée avec de l’isoflurane, du protoxyde d’azote, et du fentanyl (0,93 μg · kg⁻¹), le retour normal à la ventilation spontanée et à la conscience est retardé jusqu’à l’administration de naloxone (200 mg) iv effectuée 110 min après le morphinique. La raison de ce retard est inconnue.     

Interpleural block: a new technique for regional anaesthesia during percutaneous nephrostomy and nephrolithotomy

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie - Interpleural block was used in four patients undergoing percutaneous nephrostomy, one of whom also underwent percutaneous...     

Effects of benzodiazepines on mid-latency auditory evoked potentials

Midlatency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP) reflect primary cortical processing of auditory stimuli. The effects of benzodiazepines on MLAEP have not yet been studied. We examined the effects of intravenous induction of general anaesthesia using the benzodiazepines midazolam, diazepam and flunitrazepam on MLAEP in 30 patients scheduled for minor gynaecological procedures. Anaesthesia was induced with midazolam (0.2–0.3 mg · kg⁻¹, Group I, n = 10), diazepam (0.3–0.4 mg · kg⁻¹, Group II, n = 10) or flunitrazepam (0.03–0.04 mg · kg⁻¹, Group III, n = 10). Auditory-evoked potentials were recorded before and five to ten minutes after induction of general anaesthesia. Latencies of the peak V, Na, Pa, Nb and P1 (ms) and amplitudes Na/Pa, Pa/Nb and Nb/ P1 (μV) were measured. In the awake state, MLAEP had high peak to peak amplitudes and a periodic waveform. After induction of anaesthesia there was no or only a small increase in latencies of the peaks Na, Pa, Nb and P1, which was significant only for P1 in the midazolam group. Amplitudes Na/ Pa, Pa/Nb and Nb/P1 decreased only slightly and which reached statistical significance only for Na/Pa in the flunitrazepam group. The MLAEPs do not change markedly in amplitude or latency during induction of general anaesthesia with benzodiazepines. Primary cortical processing of auditory stimuli seems to be preserved under benzodiazepines. This may be seen in connection with cases of intraoperative awareness and especially the perception of auditory stimuli during anaesthetic regimens where benzodiazepines are used to suppress consciousness. Les potentiels évoqués auditifs de latence médiane (MLAEP) reflètent le premier processus de traitement cortical du stimulus auditif. Nous avons étudiés les effets de l’induction de l’anes-thésie générale intraveineuse avec les benzodiazépines midazolam, diazepam et flunitrazépam sur les MLAEP chez 30 patientes programmées pour des interventions gynécologiques mineures. L’induction anesthésique est réalisée par le midazolam (0,2–0,3 mg · kg⁻¹, groupe I, n = 10), le diazépam (0,3–0,4 mg · kg⁻¹, group II, n = 10) ou le flunitrazepam (0,03–0,04 mg · kg⁻¹, groupe III, n = 10). Les potentiels auditifs sont enregistrés avant et cinq ou dix minutes après l’induction de l’anesthésie générale. La latence des pointes V, Na, Pa, Nb et P1 (ms) et l’amplitude Na/Pa, Pa/Nb et Nb/P1 (μv) sont mesurées. A l’état vigile, les MLAEP ont des amplitudes de pointe élevées et une forme d’onde périodique. Après l’induction anesthésique, il n’y a pas d’augmentation ou une légère augmentation des pointes Na, Pa, Nb et P1, qui est significative pour P1 seulement dans le groupe midazolam. L’amplitude de Na, Pa, Nb et P1 diminue légèrement. Cette diminution n’est significative que pour Na/Pa avec le groupe flunitrazépam. Les MLAEP ne présentent vraiement pas de variations en amplitude et en latence pendant l’induction de l’anesthésie générale avec les benzodiazépines. Ceci peut être en rapport avec un état de veille peropératoire et spécialement avec la perception de stimuli auditifs pendant les techniques anesthésiques qui font appel aux benzodiazépines pour produire l’inconscience.     

Low-dose sufentanil and lidocaine supplementation of general anaesthesia

This randomized double-blind study compared the effects of: (1) saline infusion (C); (2) sufentanil alone (1.0 micrograms.kg-1) (S); and (3) low-dose sufentanil (0.5 micrograms.kg-1) in combination with lidocaine (1.5 mg.kg-1) (LS): on the cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation and on postoperative ventilation as monitored by respiratory inductive plethysmography in day-care surgical procedures of approximately 60 min duration. Thirty healthy, unpremedicated patients were studied. Thiopentone requirements were reduced by 40 and 28 per cent in the S and LS groups respectively compared with control (P less than 0.001). Both treatments suppressed HR and BP responses (P less than 0.005) to intubation. Postoperatively, PaCO2 was elevated (P less than 0.05) in group S. Dose-related respiratory depression was observed. The incidence of postoperative apnoea was significantly higher in both S and LS groups than compared with control (P less than 0.05). However, only patients in group S showed higher apnoea index and mean apnoea duration over the initial 10-20 min after surgery compared with control (P less than 0.005). In addition, group S showed slower respiratory frequency and prolonged expiratory time (P less than 0.005). In conclusion, an induction dose of sufentanil (1 microgram.kg-1) used in balanced anaesthesia of less than 70 min duration was associated with significant respiratory depression, particularly during the initial 10-20 min after surgery, whereas low-dose sufentanil (0.5 micrograms.kg-1) with lidocaine (1.5 mg.kg-1) had minimal postoperative respiratory depression and comparable attenuation of pressor responses to intubation.     

Interactions of preoperative erythromycin administration with general anaesthesia

Previous reports have demonstrated a gastric emptying effect of erythromycin due to a motilin-like mechanism. We studied 50 patients, scheduled for daycase laparoscopy, randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group P patients received 30 min before induction of anaesthesia, in a double-blind manner an infusion of 250 ml dextrose 5% while patients in Group E (n = 25) received 500 mg of erythromycin diluted in 250 ml dextrose 5%. An orogastric tube was inserted to measure both gastric pH using a pHmeter and residual gastric volume (RG V) using the phenol red dilutional technique. Six patients were excluded for surgical reasons. More patients in Group P (6/22) than in Group E (0/22) had RGV > 25 ml and more patients in Group P (17/22) presented with a gastric pH < 2.5 than in Group E (5/22), P < 0.05. Since coma and respiratory depression have been reported recently after midazolam and alfentanil administration in patients having received erythromycin, recovery conditions were assessed and were found to be comparable between groups. In conclusion, the administration of iv erythromycin before outpatient laparoscopy decreased residual gastric volume and increased gastric pH without affecting recovery from general anaesthesia.