无精子症病人100例取精方法及妊娠结局

目的 :回顾性分析 2 0 0 1年 1月～ 2 0 0 2年 1月在生殖中心行卵胞质内单精子注射 (ICSI)治疗的 10 0例无精子症男性的治疗结果。　方法 :经皮附睾精子抽吸术 (PESA)或睾丸精子抽提术 (TESE)获得精子 ,女方进行常规超排卵。分析激素水平 ,行睾丸组织学检查 ,评估取精的成功率、受精率、种植率和临床妊娠率。　结果 :76例(76 % )经PESA获得精子 ,2 3例 (2 3% )通过TESE获得精子。PESA和TESE组的受精率、种植率和临床妊娠率分别为 71.3%和 75 .18% ,2 0 .35 %和 2 2 .0 5 % ,4 2 .11%和 4 1.6 0 %。PESA组有 32例临床妊娠 ,其中 15例继续妊娠 ,15例已分娩 ,2例流产。TESE组有 10例临床妊娠 ,其中 6例继续妊娠 ,2例已分娩 ,2例流产。两组的受精率、种植率和临床妊娠率差异无显著性。在TESE组有 1例取精失败而放弃治疗。　结论 :激素水平和睾丸组织学检查不能预测附睾或睾丸取精的成功 ,PESA和TESE获得精子进行单精子注射是治疗男性无精子症的有效方法 ,两组的受精率 ,种植率和临床妊娠率差异无显著性 (P >0 .0 5 )。     

附睾及睾丸精子行ICSI治疗无精子症妊娠结局

目的 :回顾性分析 5 0例无精子症患者利用附睾或睾丸精子行卵细胞胞质内单精子注射 (ICSI)的治疗结局。　方法 :经皮附睾精子抽吸术 (PESA)或睾丸切开取精术 (TESE)获得精子行ICSI,评估取精的成功率 ,ICSI后的受精率、种植率及临床妊娠率 ,以精液精子ICSI组作为对照。　结果 :PESA、TESE与精液精子组分别注射MⅡ期成熟卵子 2 86、36 0、15 6 9个 ,受精率 3组差异无显著性 (74 .8% ,75 .2 %vs 77.5 % ,P >0 .0 5 )。种植率、妊娠率TESE与精液精子组差异无显著性 (2 9.87%vs 2 9.5 4 % ;4 8.15 %vs 5 2 .6 0 % ,P >0 .0 5 ) ,PESA组显著高于TESE组及精液精子组 (5 0 .85 %vs 2 9.87% ,2 9.5 4 % ;6 8%vs 4 8.15 % ,5 2 .6 0 % ,P <0 .0 5 )。PESA组共妊娠 17例 ,已分娩 6例 ,继续妊娠 9例 ,流产 2例 ;TESE组共妊娠 13例 ,已分娩 7例 ,继续妊娠 4例 ,流产 2例。　结论 :采用附睾或睾丸精子行ICSI是治疗男性无精子症的有效方法。     

经皮附睾精子抽吸术和睾丸精子获取术在无精子症诊断和治疗中的应用

目的 :研究附睾和睾丸精子抽吸术对无精子症患者的诊断和治疗价值。　方法 :应用经皮附睾精子抽吸术(PESA)和睾丸精子获取术 (TESE)两种方法对 385例无精子症患者进行穿刺检查。　结果 :其中 6 4例附睾中存在精子 (1 6 .6 2 %) ;4 5例患者睾丸中存在精子 (1 1 .6 9%) ;对其中 6 4例睾丸或附睾中发现精子的患者采取PESA或TESE取精后行卵细胞胞质内单精子注射 (ICSI)治疗。胚胎移植后妊娠率为 39.0 7%。　结论 :PESA和TESE为部分无精子症患者提供了生育的机会 ,也是针对无精子症的有效的治疗手段。     

146例炎症梗阻性无精子症的临床评估和ICSI治疗结局分析

目的分析炎症梗阻性无精子症的临床评估和单精子卵胞浆内注射(ICSI)的治疗结局。方法前瞻性研究近5年间接受ICSI治疗的炎症性梗阻性无精子症的临床特征、精液和超声特点,经皮附睾穿刺精子抽吸术(PESA)或经皮睾丸穿刺取精术(TEFNA)结合ICSI治疗后观察受精、临床妊娠等结果。结果146例患者体检附睾均有增粗变硬或伴头尾部结节。82例患者曾有生育史、附睾炎症史或输精管附睾吻合手术史,其中72例PESA找到附睾精子;53例无上述病史者49例PESA找到附睾精子:另有精道远端梗阻11例。ICSI治疗146例167周期炎症性梗阻性无精子症的受精率、每周期临床妊娠率分别为81.1%和42.1%。结论炎症梗阻性无精子症具备典型的临床和超声特征,PESA附睾精子获取率高,ICSI治疗获得较高受精率和临床妊娠率。     

外科取精术在无精子症诊断与治疗中的应用

目的研究外科取精术在无精子症诊断与治疗中的应用价值。方法在诊断为无精子症的、患者中,经睾丸体积测定、血清性激素水平、生殖系统超声等检查后,选择符合条件者198例,在局麻下行外科取精术,对获得组织显微镜下检查,统计分析取精结果。获得的精子行卵胞浆内单精子显微注射术（ICSI）及胚胎移植术（ET）,统计评估受精率、卵裂率、临床妊娠率及流产率。结果其中78例附睾中存在精子（39．4％）,23例睾丸中存在精子（11．6％）。睾丸体积正常的取精成功率明显高于睾丸体积偏小者,有显著性差异（P〈0．01）。血清促卵泡刺激素（FSH）水平正常的取精成功率明显高于FSH增高者,差异有显著性意义（P〈0．01）。82例外科取精术获得精子的患者进行ICSI治疗,附睾取精组与睾丸取精组比较,受精率、卵裂率、临床妊娠率及流产率差异均无统计学意义（P均〉0．05）。结论外科取精术操作简单且创伤较小,能准确鉴别诊断梗阻性无精子症（OA）及非梗阻性无精子症（NOA）,对无精子症的诊断有重要价值;为部分无精子症患者提供了生育自己生物学子代的机会,也是针对无精子症的有效治疗手段。     

睾丸精子行ICSI改善严重畸形精子症患者治疗结局5例报告

目的:探讨利用睾丸精子行卵细胞胞质内单精子注射(ICSI)治疗严重畸形精子症患者(精液或附睾液精子畸形率≥99%)的可行性,改善辅助生殖技术治疗结局。方法:回顾性分析5例严重畸形症精子患者(附睾液精子,n=4;精液精子,n=1)利用不同来源精子行ICSI治疗的临床资料,并比较睾丸精子组与非睾丸精子组(附睾液精子和精液精子)之间受精率、卵裂率、优质胚胎率、妊娠率以及种植率的差异。结果:5例严重畸形精子症患者取精液精子或附睾液精子行ICSI治疗后无1例妊娠,而改用睾丸精子行ICSI治疗后4例成功妊娠。睾丸精子组与非睾丸精子组之间受精率、卵裂率及优质胚胎率均无显著差异(P>0.05),而睾丸精子组妊娠率和种植率均显著高于非睾丸精子组(P<0.01)。结论:对应用附睾精子或精液精子行ICSI治疗失败的严重畸形精子症患者改用睾丸精子治疗可有效改善其治疗结局。     

采用抽吸取精法结合单精子注射治疗无精子症110例临床报告

目的分析采用抽吸取精法（PESA或TESA）获得精子进行单精予注射（ICSI）治疗无精子症的妊娠结局。方法经皮附睾精子抽吸术（PESA）获得附睾精子，经皮睾丸精子抽吸术（TESA）获得睾丸精子，女方进行常规超排卯。两种取精方法获得的精子进行ICSI，比较其受精率、种植率和临床妊娠率。结果110例无精子症患者中有83例（75．5％）经PESA获得精子，26例（23．6％）通过TESA获得精子。PESA和TESA组的受精率、种植率和临床妊娠率分别为72．60％和74．81％，23．89％和21．54％，41．22％和40．35％。两组的受精率、种植率和临床妊娠率比较，差异无显著性（P〉0．05）。在TESA组有1例取精失败而放弃治疗。结论采用抽吸取精方法（PESA或TESA）获得精子进行ICSI是治疗男性无精子症的有效方法。     

附睾和睾丸精子活力对卵胞浆内单精子注射结局的影响

目的比较附睾或睾丸来源及其不同活力精子行卵胞浆内单精子注射（ICSI）的结局。方法回顾性分析2005年1月至2008年5月在本生殖中心经皮附睾精子抽吸术（PESA）、睾丸精子抽吸术（TESA）助孕的218例无精子症患者的资料,比较附睾和睾丸及其不同活力精子的正常受精率、卵裂率、优质胚胎率、临床妊娠率、种植率和早期流产率。结果附睾精子组与睾丸精子组比较,正常受精率、卵裂率、临床妊娠率、种植率和早期流产率无显著性差异（P〉0．05）;优质胚胎率附睾精子组显著高于睾丸精子组（P〈0．05）。附睾活动精子、睾丸活动精子和睾丸不活动精子的正常受精率显著高于附睾不活动精子（P〈0．01）;睾丸活动精子的正常受精率显著高于睾丸不活动精子组（P〈0．05）;以上各组间的优质胚胎率、临床妊娠率、种植率、流产率均无显著性差异（P〉0．05）。结论PESA操作简单且不影响妊娠率,无精子症患者行ICSI治疗时可首选附睾精子;附睾或睾丸不活动精子影响ICSI的受精率,应优先选择活力较好的精子,若无活动精子则选择睾丸不活动精子。     

再次经皮睾丸细针抽吸术取精失败影响因素浅析

本中心自1998年9月至2005年4月底共458例(包括梗阻性和非梗阻性无精子症、严重的少精子、死精子症)病人进行睾丸取精加卵胞浆内单精子显微注射(ICSI)治疗。睾丸取精均采用经皮睾丸精子抽吸术     

经皮附睾穿刺取精精子冷冻复苏后卵细胞胞质内单精子注射治疗无精子症的初步研究

目的:回顾性分析27例无精子症患者经皮附睾穿刺取精术(PESA)所获精子冷冻复苏后行卵细胞胞质内单精子注射(ICSI)治疗后的效果及妊娠结局。方法:将诊断性附睾穿刺以及PESA治疗周期ICSI后所剩余活精子以常规方法加以冷冻,将复苏后找到了足量活精子并行ICSI的病例归为冻精组,而采用新鲜PESA活精子ICSI的病例则归为对照组。比较冻精组与对照组的受精率、种植率、临床妊娠率,同时分析两组间的妊娠并发症、新生儿出生及畸形等情况。结果:冻精组15个周期、对照组100个周期分别注射MⅡ期成熟卵子163、1 157个,受精率冻精组显著高于对照组(84.05%vs73.29%,P<0.05),种植率、临床妊娠率则两组间差异无显著性(23.07%vs15.73%;53.33%vs37.00%,P>0.05),新生儿出生体重差异亦无显著性(P>0.05)。冻精组共妊娠8例,已分娩5例,继续妊娠3例。对照组妊娠37例,已分娩30例,1例死胎;继续妊娠3例;流产4例。两组均未出现重大的妊娠并发症及新生儿畸形。结论:采用PESA冷冻精子ICSI是治疗男性无精子症的一种经济、有效、安全的方法;但PESA冻精复苏率有待于进一步提高。     

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the treatment of male infertility due to obstructive or non-obstructive azoospermia

<正> Objective:To evaluate the effects of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) ontreatment of infertility due to obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia.Methods:A retrospective analysis of fertilization,cleavage,embryo implantationand pregnancy rates was done in 158 ICSI cycles including 112 obstructive azoospermiaand 46 non-obstructive azoospermia.Ovarian hyperstimulation and ICSI procedureswere performed by conventional protocol.The sperm was collected by percutaneous epi-didymal sperm aspiration (PESA) or testicular sperm extraction (TESE).Results:The fertilization rate (73.1% vs.67.0%),cleavage rate (88.6% vs.86.3%),embryo implantation rate (20.7% vs.11.4%),clinical pregnancy rate per trans-fer cycle (35.7% vs.19.6%) were obtained for obstructive and non-obstructiveazoospermia,respectively.Conclusion:The results revealed that in the cases of obstructive azoospermia,ferti-lization rate,embryo implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate were significantlyhigher than those of non-obstructive azoospermia.But there was no significant differ-ence of the cleavage rate between two groups.     

Surgical sperm retrieval after previous vasectomy and failed reversal: clinical implications for in vitro fertilization

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of the interval between previous vasectomy reversal on retrieval rates of epididymal and testicular spermatozoa using percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA), or testicular sperm extraction (TESE), and the subsequent reproductive potential of these gametes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-six consecutive sperm retrievals were considered in patients who were azoospermic after previous vasectomy, of whom 54 had had a previous failed reversal, the remainder deciding against a reversal. PESA and TESE retrieval rates were noted, as were the time since vasectomy and the interval between vasectomy and unsuccessful reversal. The presence of palpable epididymal cysts was noted, with their effect on sperm retrieval rates. Fertilization and pregnancy rates were analysed in subsequent ICSI cycles using freshly retrieved spermatozoa or frozen-thawed cryopreserved spermatozoa. RESULTS: All 66 patients had sperm retrieved successfully; the success rates for PESA were not significantly affected by previous failed reversal when compared with patients who had not had a reversal, at 14 of 54 (26%) vs five of 12 (P=0.3). The interval since vasectomy did not affect PESA retrieval rates but there was a significantly poorer retrieval rate for PESA in the presence of palpable epididymal cysts, at seven of 35 (20%) vs 12 of 23 (52%) (P=0.012). Fertilization rates were significantly lower using cryopreserved spermatozoa retrieved from either the epididymis or testis (50% vs 70%, P=0.007), although subsequent implantation and pregnancy rates were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Surgical sperm retrieval is successful in all cases of azoospermia secondary to vasectomy, either by PESA or TESE. There are no clinical markers to indicate which patients will have successful PESA after vasectomy, although the presence of epididymal cysts is associated with significantly lower retrieval rates. The reduction in fertilising ability of cryopreserved spermatozoa does not affect clinical pregnancy rates in ICSI cycles.     

梗阻性无精子症患者睾丸抽吸精子行ICSI后的胚胎结局

目的总结非手术精子抽吸(NSA)联合ICSI对梗阻性无精子症患者的治疗意义,并探讨精子来源等对ICSI后胚胎结局的影响。方法回顾性分析642个ICSI周期,比较了睾丸抽吸精子和精液精子行ICSI后的受精率、优质胚胎率、临床妊娠率、种植率及胚胎停育率等。结果NSA睾丸精子组和精液精子组相比较,其2PN受精率、优质胚胎率、临床妊娠率、种植率及胚胎停育率之间均没有显著性差异(71．4％vs 73．2％, 73．1％vs 70．1％,34．2％vs 32．6％,22．3％vs 19．8％,21．3％vs 25．0％,P>0．05)。结论非手术抽吸睾丸精子联合ICSI是治疗梗阻性无精子症的一种有效方法。     

Sperm retrieval rate and reproductive outcome of infertile men with azoospermia factor c deletion

To evaluate the success rate in sperm retrieval (SR) through microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro‐TESE) in infertile azoospermia factor c (AZFc)‐deleted men and determining their reproductive outcomes following ICSI, medical records of couples with AZFc‐deleted male partners were reviewed on patient's age, serum hormone levels, karyotype, testicular pathology and pregnancy outcomes. A comparison on age and serum hormone level was conducted between groups with positive and negative sperm retrieval in both azoospermic and oligozoospermic AZFc‐deleted men. Of 225 who had AZFc deletion, 195 cases followed clinical treatments. From 195 cases, 116 were azoospermic, 79 were oligozoospermic. Pathology profile was available in 103 of 195 subjects which the predominant trait was SCOS and was seen in 66.9% of cases (69 of 103). Success rate of sperm retrieval in azoospermic patients who underwent micro‐TESE was 36.3% (28/77). Forty‐three oligozoospermic and 17 azoospermic patients started ART cycle. Pregnancy rate in oligozoospermic group was 35.4% (17 cases), whilst there was no clinical pregnancy in azoospermic group. In conclusion, the pregnancy and delivery in oligozoospermic patients with AZFc deletion are comparable with other studies, but despite of sperm retrieval in azoospermic patients with AZFc deletion, the chance of pregnancy or delivery in these patients was very low.     

卵细胞胞质内单精子注射在前次常规体外受精失败病例中的应用

目的:探讨卵细胞胞质内单精子注射(ICSI)是否可以改善由于受精障碍导致不孕病例的妊娠结局。方法:回顾性分析2002年1月~2004年12月由于第1周期的常规体外受精(IVF)治疗中卵子完全不受精或受精率≤20%,而在随后的治疗周期中采取ICSI方法受精的20个病例(共22个周期,研究组)的ICSI治疗结局。对照组为同期因男方少弱精子进行第1次ICSI治疗的连续100个周期。结果:与前次IVF相比,经ICSI治疗后受精率从5.4%显著提高至76.9%(χ2=264.66,P<0.001),但研究组中低受精患者经ICSI治疗后的受精率67.9%,明显低于对照组的77.5%(χ2=5.18,P<0.05)和研究组中完全不受精患者的84.2%(χ2=8.97,P<0.05)。研究组中完全不受精患者的妊娠率和胚胎种植率分别为57.1%和40.5%,均高于对照组的35.0%和18.9%,但仅胚胎种植率的差异有显著性意义(χ2=8.80,P<0.01)。结论:ICSI可以有效地克服受精障碍,提高受精率,并且可明显改善妊娠结局。     

ICSI中不同来源精子对临床结局的影响

目的:分析不同来源精子在卵细胞胞质内单精子注射(ICSI)后的临床结局。方法:将682个ICSI治疗周期分为:射出精子组(598例)、经皮附睾精子抽吸术(PESA)得到精子组(58例)、睾丸精子获取术(TSE)得到精子组(26例),比较三组的受精率、临床妊娠率、种植率、流产率、异位妊娠率以及分娩率之间的差别。结果:TSE组受精率明显低于射出精子组和PESA组(81.06%vs87.95%,87.82%,P<0.05);射出精子组、PESA组和TSE组的妊娠率(39.46%,48.28%,34.62%)、种植率(19.80%,23.80%,18.34%)、流产率(13.13%,17.86%,11.11%)、异位妊娠率(5.51%,7.14%,11.11%)、分娩率(32.11%,36.21%,26.92%),均没有显著差异(P>0.05)。结论:虽然TSE来源精子对ICSI受精率有所影响,但射出精子和手术(TSE和PESA)来源精子对妊娠结局没有影响。