Do the best students go into general surgery?

BACKGROUND: Recent match trends by medical graduates have revealed a declining interest in general surgery. Our study evaluates the academic strength of recent graduates to determine the quality of those matching to general surgery residencies. METHODS: All third-year students rotating through the 8-week surgical clerkship from July 1998-June 2000 (n = 291) were followed at the University of Wisconsin Medical School. Each student completed 4 weeks of general surgery and 4 weeks of surgical subspecialties. Match data provided residency choices and students were divided into general surgery (GS), surgical subspecialty (SS), and nonsurgical (NS) residencies. Student performance was based upon National Board of Medical Experiences (NBME) surgery exam, class rank and Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) status. RESULTS: Students at our institution scored at the national mean on the NBME exam. GS team, session, and timing of GS rotation had no relationship to exam score. Total number of operative cases observed was inversely related to exam performance (P = 0.02). Of students entering a GS career, most scored below the mean on the NBME exam, 46% graduated in the bottom two thirds of the class, and only 6% of AOA members entered a GS residency. CONCLUSION: Although many of the strongest medical students select surgical residencies, they choose to enter SS careers and not GS careers.     

Do medical school surgical rotations influence subspecialty choice?

BACKGROUND: A comprehensive exposure to general surgery is essential for medical students pursuing careers in surgery. Occasionally, students applying for surgical residency positions must choose a subspecialty field prior to starting their residency training. Often, this decision is heavily based on their experience on various surgical clerkships. MATERIALS and METHODS: To determine if surgical clerkships influence subspecialty choice, we surveyed medical students who interviewed for general surgery training over a 2-year period at The Johns Hopkins Hospital. RESULTS: Of 211 surveys sent, 146 were returned (66%). The mean age of the students was 26 +/- 0 years with 21% being female. Students anticipating subspecialization in cardiothoracic, plastic, pediatric, and transplant surgery saw significantly more operations in their respective fields. Similar trends were seen in vascular surgery and surgical oncology. Despite the apparent differences in exposure to subspecialty operations, all students saw equal numbers of hernia repairs and laparoscopic cholecystectomies. CONCLUSIONS: While medical students pursuing careers in surgery have equal exposure to general surgery, their anticipated subspecialty field highly correlated with their operative exposure to that field. Thus, medical school surgical rotations appear to highly influence subspecialty choice.     

Medical student operative experience correlates with a match to a categorical surgical program

BACKGROUND: Interest in general surgical residencies has decreased significantly. Because medical student clerkship experiences may affect specialty preferences, we attempted to determine if the degree of exposure to surgical procedures influenced career choices. METHODS: Operations observed by students who completed the third-year surgical clerkship between 1998 and 1999 were reviewed. These 146 medical students, who matched to residency training programs in March 2000, were then divided into three groups based upon residency fields. Surgical case exposures were then compared between the groups. RESULTS: The total number of operations observed was similar between the groups. However, students who matched into categorical general surgical programs participated in significantly more abdominal and general surgical procedures than those matching in surgical subspecialty or nonsurgical residencies (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be a correlation between surgical case exposure during the third-year clerkships and future residency fields. Thus, the degree of exposure to surgical procedures may influence medical student career choices.     

Innovative introduction to surgery in the preclinical years

BACKGROUND: Lack of exposure to surgery in the preclinical years of medical school contributes to students' negative opinions of the field and to low application rates to categorical surgical programs. METHODS: Forty preclinical medical students attended a series of 16 seminars and practice sessions covering the gamut of surgical specialties and basic technical skills. Students were given a Likert format survey before and after taking the course. RESULTS: Students gave high ratings to course content (4.26/5) and lecturers (4.54/5). Students' confidence in their surgical skills doubled (1.45/5 to 3/5, P < .0001), and their perceived readiness for the surgical clerkship increased by 73% (1.63/5 to 2.82/5, P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: The preclinical years offer a promising venue for improving medical student interest and performance in surgery.     

Laparoscopy as an educational and recruiting tool

BACKGROUND: General surgeons can supplement traditional gross anatomy instruction by using laparoscopy to provide clinical correlations. Early, positive interaction with surgeons may stimulate student interest in this field. METHODS: Basic laparoscopy was performed on fresh cadavers for first year medical students in gross anatomy over 2 consecutive years. Surgical residents reviewed anatomy of the abdomen, and students manipulated intra-abdominal organs using laparoscopic instruments. Students completed pre- and post-demonstration questionnaires that were compared independently. RESULTS: More than 95% of responding students agreed the demonstration enhanced their understanding of abdominal anatomy. Regardless of planned area of specialization, students felt the demonstration reinforced the clinical relevance of gross anatomy. Among students already anticipating surgical careers, 88.2% said the demonstration increased their interest in general surgery; this was significantly higher than among those intending careers in internal medicine (27.3%) or other fields (23.5%; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Cadaver-based laparoscopy demonstrations by general surgeons supplement didactic sessions and enhance learning in gross anatomy. Furthermore, such demonstrations may stimulate student interest in general surgery at an early point in their medical education, particularly in those already interested in a surgical career.     

�ҹ���ͨ���ҽʦ����ģʽ����ѧ���ٵ����⼰�Բ�

??Problems and strategies faced by training model and education of general surgeon YANG Zhen. Department of Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan430030,China
Abstract At present, chinese general surgery should improve residency and subspecialty residencies training utilized global standards which is consisted of 3 overlapping phases.Fundamentals of surgery curriculum and surgical skills curriculum are an effective way to enhance the students' basic surgical skills and would obtain the global standards for postgraduate medical education. Working-hour restrictions and a heightened awareness of patient safety has changed resident education and training. Specialization and the current practices of general surgeons are a important problem.Postgraduate medical students program should be combined with resident training.Interprofessional education and service learning is a model for the future of health professions education. Simulation-based surgical education and simulator center has completely revolutionized the training process,especially in the laparoscopic and robotic surgery curriculum for resident training. Virtual realicy is the application of the computer aid technique in recent years, which shows its dominant position in medical education. E-learning will play an important role in the near future.     

Accelerated skills preparation and assessment for senior medical students entering surgical internship

BACKGROUND: Skills training plays an increasing role in residency training. Few medical schools have skills courses for senior students entering surgical residency. METHODS: A skills course for 4(th)-year medical students matched in a surgical specialty was conducted in 2006 and 2007 during 7 weekly 3-hour sessions. Topics included suturing, knot tying, procedural skills (eg, chest tube insertion), laparoscopic skills, use of energy devices, and on-call management problems. Materials for outside practice were provided. Pre- and postcourse assessment of suturing skills was performed; laparoscopic skills were assessed postcourse using the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons' Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery program. Students' perceived preparedness for internship was assessed by survey (1 to 5 Likert scale). Data are mean +/- SD and statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: Thirty-one 4(th)-year students were enrolled. Pre- versus postcourse surveys of 45 domains related to acute patient management and technical and procedural skills indicated an improved perception of preparedness for internship overall (mean pre versus post) for 28 questions (p < 0.05). Students rated course relevance as "highly useful" (4.8 +/- 0.5) and their ability to complete skills as "markedly improved" (4.5 +/- 0.6). Suturing and knot-tying skills showed substantial time improvement pre- versus postcourse for 4 of 5 tasks: simple interrupted suturing (283 +/- 73 versus 243 +/- 52 seconds), subcuticular suturing (385 +/- 132 versus 274 +/- 80 seconds), 1-handed knot tying (73 +/- 33 versus 58 +/- 22 seconds), and tying in a restricted space (54 +/- 18 versus 44 +/- 16 seconds) (p < 0.02). Only 2-handed knot tying did not change substantially (65 +/- 24 versus 59 +/- 24 seconds). Of 13 students who took the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery skills test, 5 passed all 5 components and 3 passed 4 of 5 components. CONCLUSIONS: Skills instruction for senior students entering surgical internship results in a higher perception of preparedness and improved skills performance. Medical schools should consider integrating skills courses into the 4(th)-year curriculum to better prepare students for surgical residency.     

Predictors of Technical Skill Acquisition Among Resident Trainees in a Laparoscopic Skills Education Program

BACKGROUND: Administrative and financial pressures on surgical education have created a need for efficient training curricula. Predictors of innate technical ability, which would guide the optimization of such a curriculum, are not well described. The goal of this study was to identify student characteristics predictive of innate pretraining skill level and response to training during the course of a four-week laparoscopic skills development program. METHODS: Laparoscopic skills in 35 first-year surgical residents were assessed with the McGill Inanimate System for Training and Evaluation of Laparoscopic Skills (MISTELS) before and after a four-week skills training program and after an interval of approximately 1 year. The correlation between trainee characteristics, including age, sex, designated surgical specialty, and laparoscopic skill level was assessed by using Pearson's correlation and paired t-test studies. RESULTS: Intake MISTELS scores showed no significant correlation to age, sex, or designated field. Interns designated for the general surgery training program had significantly higher final scores than those entering other fields (p = 0.02). There was a negative correlation between trainee age and both degree of improvement during training and final scores (p = 0.02 and 0.05). A history of video game use correlated with significantly higher initial scores and better skills retention (p = 0.03 and 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: A laparoscopic technical curriculum can achieve basic proficiency even when taught to a diverse group of trainees. Older residents beginning their surgical careers may be slower to develop technical skills. Choice of subspecialty seems to predict higher level of proficiency after completion of a skills training program among resident students.     

我国普通外科医师培养模式及教学面临的问题及对策

当前,我国普通外科要以国际标准完善住院医师和专科培训,涵盖医学教育连续统一体的3个阶段。外科基础课程和外科技能课程能有效地提升学生的基本手术技术和能达到全球医学教育最基本要求。医师工作时间的限制和病人安全意识的加强改变了住院医师教育和培训的模式。普通外科医师的专业化与当前的临床实践是重要问题。研究生的教育应与专科医师培训相结合。跨专业教育和学习服务是对未来医疗卫生教育的一种模式。基于虚拟技术的外科培训和模拟中心完全改变了教育的程序,特别是住院医师培训的腹腔镜和机器人外科课程。虚拟现实技术是近年出现的计算机辅助应用技术,在医学教育领域展显优势。电子学习系统将发挥重要作用。     

Preliminary General Surgery Residents: Indentured Servitude or Golden Opportunity?

BACKGROUND: One-year, preliminary general surgery (GS) positions are viewed by medical student applicants as among the least desirable positions offered through the match. Hundreds of preliminary GS positions go unfilled each year, and international medical graduates (IMGs) fill a substantial portion of the spots filled. "Prelims" foster diversity and add manpower to surgical training programs, but do trainees eventually benefit from this 1-year effort? METHODS: Nondesignated (ND) preliminary GS residents at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, were identified from 1993 to 2003. Trainees were followed (telephone, e-mail, Internet registries) looking at subsequent training, specialty choice, and eventual practice location. RESULTS: From 118 ND preliminary GS residents, the current data of 105 (46 U.S. medical graduates, 59 IMGs) trainees are known. Thirteen trainees (11%) progressed on to a second year of training (location: United States=10, international=3), but they could not be located thereafter. Two additional prelims chose another profession. Seventy one of the remaining 103 prelims (70%) advanced to other non-Mayo residency programs to continue or finish their training in general surgery (n=22), a surgical subspecialty (n=26), or some other field (n=23). Thirty-two prelims remained at Mayo Clinic-Rochester in GS (n=16), a surgical subspecialty (n=12), or a nonsurgical field (n=4). From the 59 IMGs, 52 remained in the United States, whereas 7 left for another country to practice medicine. CONCLUSION: Most of our ND preliminary GS residents progress toward completion of surgical or medicine residencies. Although initially described as a finite period of training, the 1-year preliminary GS residency offers both U.S. and international students opportunity for career advancement.     

Building a laparoscopic surgical skills training laboratory: resources and support.

BACKGROUND: Technical skills have historically been developed and assessed in the operating room. Multiple pressures including resident work hour limitations, increasing costs of operating room time, and patient safety concerns have led to an increased interest in conducting these activities in a safe, reproducible environment. To address some of these issues, many residency programs have developed laparoscopic surgical skills training laboratories. We sought to determine the current status of laparoscopic skills laboratories across residency programs. METHODS: In December 2004, surveys were mailed to all 251 United States general surgery residency program directors. This brief 2-page survey consists of 9 questions regarding laparoscopic skills training laboratories. RESULTS: Of the 251 mailed surveys, 111 completed surveys were returned (44%). Of the respondents, 81 have laparoscopic skills training laboratories in place (80%). Skills laboratories that used a defined curriculum, and general surgery programs that shared their laboratories with other training programs were determined to have significantly more resources. A wide variety of funding sources have been used to develop and support these skills laboratories. CONCLUSIONS: Significant variability in training practices and equipment currently used exists between laboratories. A more efficient, standardized approach to skills training across residency programs is a desirable goal for the immediate future.     

The need for training opportunities in advanced laparoscopic surgery

Background: There is controversy regarding the amount of training necessary to safely perform advanced laparoscopic surgery. General surgical residency often provides only a low volume of advanced laparoscopic cases and there is growing interest in nonaccredited fellowships focused on laparoscopic surgery.Objective: To assess surgical residents' perception of the need for training in advanced laparoscopic surgery in addition to that provided in a standard general surgical residency. Methods: A 15-item questionnaire was mailed to 985 physicians who either were Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) candidate members or had attended a SAGES resident course in 1998 or 1999. For the purposes of the survey, laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, laparoscopic herniorrhaphy, laparoscopic splenectomy, and laparoscopic colectomy were chosen as advanced procedures. Results: Of the 85 responses obtained, 81% were from respondents who were at the postgraduate fourth-year (PG4) level or higher. Furthermore, 58% of the respondents had taken a course in advanced laparoscopic surgery outside their residency program. The respondents believed that to perform the procedures safely and with confidence on entering practice, they needed to do at least eight each of the selected laparoscopic procedures. As reported, 45% of the respondents had performed three or fewer laparoscopic hernias; 60% had performed three or fewer laparoscopic Nissen fundoplications; 81% had performed three or fewer laparoscopic colectomies; and 86% had performed three or fewer splenectomies. Only 32% of the residents expected to perform more than 10 laparoscopic Nissen fundoplications, only 10% expected to perform more than 10 colectomies, and only 4% expected to perform more than 10 splenectomies before completing their residency. Many respondents (65%) said they would pursue an additional year of advanced laparoscopic training if it were available. In programs unaffiliated with a fellowship in advanced laparoscopic surgery, 65% of the residents were concerned that such a fellowship would interfere with residency training in laparoscopic surgery. In comparison, only 24% of the residents in programs affiliated with a fellowship in advanced laparoscopic surgery believed that the fellowship interfered with their training, whereas 47% of the residents in programs affiliated with a fellowship in advanced laparoscopic surgery thought that the fellowship had no impact on their training. Conclusions: Residents clearly perceive a need for additional training in advanced laparoscopic surgery. Residents from programs without a laparoscopic fellowship are concerned about a negative impact on their experience from a laparoscopic fellow, but residents from programs with a laparoscopic fellowship are neutral about the impact of a fellow.     

Are surgical progeny more likely to pursue a surgical career?

BACKGROUND: For nearly two decades, interest in general surgery has been declining among U.S. medical school graduates. Many factors appear to be important in a medical student's choice of a surgical residency and career. We hypothesized that previous exposure to family members who are surgeons would significantly influence a student's decision to pursue a career in surgery. METHODS: Since 2001, nearly 600 third-year medical students completing the general surgery clerkship were issued a pre- and post-clerkship survey. Responses were collected, retrospectively analyzed, and correlated to the 2001-2007 National Residency Matching Program match results. RESULTS: The response rate of students completing both surveys was 87% (n = 510). Based on a numeric scale, surgical progeny (SP) indicated a significantly higher likelihood than nonsurgical progeny (NSP) of pursing a surgical career/residency in the pre-clerkship period (SP mean, 5.1 +/- 0.42; NSP mean, 3.7 +/- 0.11; P = 0.0005). Post-clerkship, SPs noted no more enjoyment from the surgical clerkship than NSPs (SP mean, 7.2 +/- 0.25; NSP mean, 6.9 +/- 0.96; P = 0.91); furthermore, there was no difference in the percentage of students pursuing a surgical residency (categorical or surgical subspecialty) in the National Residency Matching Program match (SP, 12.5%; NSP, 12.7%; P = 1.00). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that previous exposure to a surgeon within the family positively influences a medical student's pre-clerkship interest in pursuing a surgical career. However, this interest is not sustained; SPs and NSPs match into surgical residencies at equivalent rates. Clearly, further studies are needed to identify the factors responsible for this phenomenon.     

A mentorship-based preclinical elective increases exposure,confidence, and interest in surgery

Background

The predicted shortage of surgeons is of growing concern with declining medical student interest in surgical careers. We hypothesized that earlier exposure to operative experiences and the establishment of resident mentors through a preclinical elective would enhance student confidence and interest in surgery.

Methods

We developed a preclinical elective in surgery, which served as an organized curriculum for junior medical students to experience surgery through a paired resident-mentorship model. We assessed student exposure and confidence with clinical activities before and after the elective (N = 24, 100% response rate). We compared these students with a cohort of peers not enrolled in the elective (N = 147, 67% response rate).

Results

We found significantly improved confidence (2.8 vs 4.4) and clinical exposure (2.4 vs 4.3) before versus after the elective, with precourse scores equal to matched peers.

Conclusions

This elective incorporates elements that have been shown to positively influence student decision making in surgical career choice. The mentorship model promotes residents as educators, whereas the elective provides a means for early identification of students interested in surgery.     

Der Weg zum Unfallchirurgen

The lack of clinical residents especially in the surgical domains, including orthopaedics and trauma surgery, is not only omnipresent but also a topic of lively discussions. This lack originates from sociopolitical and healthcare policy issues as well as from a loss of attractiveness of all surgical disciplines. The loss is caused by the high workload and disadvantageous working hours especially in those disciplines with a high rate of emergencies, e.g. trauma surgery. Moreover, it is caused by the poorly structured and unpredictable period of residency. In order to anticipate the bottleneck in supply due to the lack of trainees, a number of structural and contextual measures have to be taken to improve both undergraduate und postgraduate surgical training. Due to the numerous facets of the topic the first part of this analysis refers to the period until the trainee decides on the field of training. A basic insight into the field of orthopaedics and trauma surgery can already be offered far before the period of medical studies itself. During undergraduate medical education the existing structures should be modified, the characteristics of the discipline should be emphasized and the charm of combining theory and practical skills should be highlighted in order to enhance student’s perception of the discipline. This might begin during preclinical training and should be continued throughout clinical training and elective courses (basic wound care, TEAM approach, AO course for students and seminars for M.D. candidates). Contextual and structural improvements of the practical year are indispensable to arouse students’ interest in our discipline. These options conjoined with the actual offers for students provided by our scientific society, such as guided tours during the annual congress, travelling grants and the recently inaugurated summer school, might provide the basis for clearly structured information and offer a distinct stimulus to apply for residency in our field.     

Can Brief Interventions by Hand Surgeons Influence Medical Students Toward a Career in Hand Surgery?

PURPOSE: In 2004, the American Society for Surgery of the Hand and the American Association for Hand Surgery formed a joint task force to deal with the difficulty of promoting hand surgery as a career choice to medical students. The purpose of this study was to use a previously validated format to expose medical students to a brief intervention early in their medical education that might influence their perceptions of hand surgery as a career choice. METHODS: First-year medical students were asked to rank 11 items on a Likert scale from 1 (not important) to 5 (very important) regarding their beliefs about hand surgery as a career before and after a brief 1-hour presentation by a hand surgeon. Additional information about career choice and prior exposure to hand surgery was obtained before the intervention, and student interest in hand surgery was measured after the intervention. RESULTS: Of 110 first-year medical students, 72 (65%) students completed both the pre-lecture survey and the post-lecture survey. Of the 72 students with matched responses, 8 (11%) ranked surgery as their first career choice, whereas 13 (18%) ranked a surgical subspecialty as their first choice. Thirty-nine (54%) students stated that the lecture raised their interest in hand surgery as a possible career, and 36 (50%) were interested in doing an elective in it while in medical school. Nonparametric tests showed improvement in knowledge after the lecture for length of training, technical aspects, intellectual challenge, and fellowship requirements. CONCLUSIONS: A positive information-providing encounter with a hand surgeon may favorably influence the perceptions of first-year medical students toward hand surgery.     

Why do students choose careers in surgery?

BACKGROUND: Recent changes in medical education have emphasized primary care careers. This could have a negative impact on the number of applicants to surgical residencies. We hypothesized that experiences during the third year surgical clerkship are influential for students' subsequent residency choice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Third year medical students who completed their surgical clerkship in the 2001-02 academic year were surveyed pre- and post-surgical clerkship. Responses were analyzed and correlated to the 2003 match results. RESULTS: The response rate of students surveyed was 98% (82 surveys/83 match results). Pre-clerkship, 6/82 students (7%) expressed an interest in surgery or surgical subspecialty careers. Post-clerkship, 34/84 students (40%) expressed an increased interest a surgical career; 13/84 (15%) expressed a decreased interest, and 37% of students expressed no change in career interest. Of those students expressing an increased interest in surgery, the clerkship experiences most noted to be influential were (1) number of cases participated/scrubbed (95%), (2) resident interaction (85%), (3) faculty interaction (80%), and (4) number of cases observed (65%). The number of hours spent on rotation (call, rounds) was the leading experience associated with a decreased interest in a surgical career. 12/83 students surveyed (14%) ultimately matched into a surgical program (NRMP 2003 match results). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that operative exposure and interaction with residents and faculty have a positive influence in students' choice of a surgical career. Although only 6% of students expressed an interest in surgery pre-clerkship, a 2-fold increase in this number was noted in choice of residency (14%). Work hours were the primary negative indicator for surgery residency. As medical curriculum is restructured and surgical exposure decreased, these data underscore the importance of quality exposure to both procedures and role models during the 3rd year surgical clerkship.     

Potential targets to encourage a surgical career

BACKGROUND: Our goal was to identify factors that can be targeted during medical education to encourage a career in surgery. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of first and fourth year classes in a Liaison Committee on Medical Education-accredited medical school. Students scored 19 items about perceptions of surgery using a Likert-type scale. Students also indicated their gender and ranked their top three career choices. RESULTS: There were 121 of 210 (58%) first year and 110 of 212 (52%) fourth year students who completed the survey. First year students expressed a positive correlation between surgery and career opportunities, intellectual challenge, performing technical procedures, and obtaining a residency position, although length of training, work hours, and lifestyle during and after training were negatively correlated with choosing surgery. Fourth year student responses correlated positively with career and academic opportunities, intellectual challenge, technical skills, role models, prestige, and financial rewards. Factors that correlated negatively were length of training, residency lifestyle, hours, call schedule, and female gender of the student respondent. Forty-four percent of first year male students expressed an interest in surgery versus 27% of fourth year male students (p < 0.04). Eighteen percent of first year female students expressed an interest in surgery versus 5% of fourth year female students (p < 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Lifestyle issues remain at the forefront of student concerns. Intellectual challenge, career opportunities, and technical skills are consistently recognized as strengths of surgery. Additionally, fourth year students identify role models, prestige, and financial rewards as positive attributes. Emphasizing positive aspects may facilitate attracting quality students to future careers in surgery.