Cytokine gene polymorphisms and the inflammatory response to abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

BACKGROUND: Cytokines are key mediators of the inflammatory response to surgery and polymorphic sites in their genes have been shown to affect cytokine production in vitro. The aim of this study was to determine whether cytokine gene polymorphisms affect cytokine production in vivo in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. METHODS: One hundred patients admitted for elective AAA repair had plasma levels of interleukin (IL) 1beta, IL-6, IL-10 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF) alpha measured at induction of anaesthesia and 24 h after operation. Genotypes for each patient were determined using induced heteroduplex genotyping for the following loci: IL-1beta + 3953, IL-6 - 174, IL-10 - 1082/-592 and TNF-alpha - 308. RESULTS: Patients with an IL-10 - 1082 A allele had a significantly higher IL-10 response to surgery than those without an A allele (P = 0.030) and there was also a significant difference in IL-10 response between patients with IL-10 - 1082 AA genotypes and those with GG genotypes (P = 0.030). CONCLUSION: Elective AAA repair results in a measurable cytokine response. In this study the magnitude of this response was not affected by the individual patient's cytokine gene polymorphisms.     

Long-term durability of open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE: In multiple comparisons of open vs endovascular (EVAR) repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms, the prior assumption that open repair produced superior durability has been challenged by advocates of EVAR. Although focus on EVAR reintervention has been intense, few contemporary studies document late outcomes after open repair; this was the goal of this study. METHODS: From January 1994 to December 1998 (chosen to ensure a minimum 5-year follow-up), 540 patients underwent elective open repair. Surveillance imaging (computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging scans) was obtained for 152 (57%) of the 269 patients who remained alive at a mean follow-up of 87 months. Study end points included freedom from graft-related interventions and aneurysm-related and overall survival (Kaplan-Meier test); factors predictive of these end points were determined by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The mean age at operation was 73 years. A total of 76% of patients were male; 11% had renal insufficiency (creatinine > or =1.5 mg/dL), and 13% had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The aortic cross-clamp position was suprarenal in 135 (25%) patients, and 284 (53%) of patients had bifurcated grafts placed. Operative mortality (30 days) was 3%, and the median length of hospital stay was 7 days. Postoperative complications occurred in 68 (13%) patients. Predictors of postoperative complications included a history of myocardial infarction (hazard ratio [HR], 2.0; P = .01) and renal insufficiency (HR, 2.5; P = .02). The mean follow-up for all patients was 87 months. Actuarial survival was 70.7% +/- 2% and 44.3% +/- 2.4% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Negative predictors of long-term survival included advanced age (HR, 1.1; P < .001), history of myocardial infarction (HR, 1.37; P = .02), and renal insufficiency (HR, 1.5; P = .04). Freedom from graft-related reintervention was 98.2% +/- 0.8% and 94.3% +/- 3.4% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. There were 13 late graft-related complications in 11 (2%) patients (mean follow-up, 7.2 years). Findings included seven anastomotic pseudoaneurysms (five were repaired), four graft limb occlusions, and two graft infections. Aneurysms were identified in noncontiguous arterial segments in 68 (45%) of 152 patients, most of which involved the iliac arteries and required no treatment because of small size. Late aortic aneurysms proximal to the repair were identified in 24% of patients, and 29 (19%) patients had multiple late synchronous aneurysms. CONCLUSIONS: Open repair remains a safe and durable option for the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms, with an excellent associated 10-year survival in patients who undergo operation at 75 years of age or younger. In addition, the freedom from graft-related reintervention is superior to that of EVAR. Finally, continued surveillance after open repair is appropriate and should be directed toward the detection of other aneurysms.     

Symptomatic seroma after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Seroma following open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair has rarely been described. The majority of cases in the literature have been associated with use of polytetrafluoroethylene grafts. Here, we present a patient with a very large, symptomatic periaortic graft seroma 10 years after conventional (open) repair. The etiology of such seromas is of significant interest in endovascular aortic repair.     

A systematic review of simulation in open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

ObjectiveConcerns about the long-term durability of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair and the requirement for explantation of stents in the case of infection demonstrate the continued need for open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. However, with the increased complexity and decreasing volume of open cases performed, maintenance of skills and training of younger surgeons are challenging. The aim of this review was to identify and to examine studies pertaining to open AAA simulation, with focus on methods and outcomes.MethodsWe performed a systematic review of the literature to identify primary research pertaining to open AAA repair through the use of simulators. The primary outcome was to identify predominant modes of simulator design and validated assessment tools that could demonstrate improvement in trainee skills. Secondary outcomes included identifying participant numbers needed to power studies and whether tools not validated externally contributed to the studies.ResultsThere were 309 unique papers identified, from which five papers met the inclusion criteria. The selected papers used a combination of synthetic (commercial and homemade) and cadaveric simulators. A variety of validated and nonvalidated assessment metrics were used, including Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills, global rating scales, and realism surveys. Three of the five papers used blinding as part of their assessments. Mean participant numbers were 30.8 ± 25.7 and with the exception of one paper consisted entirely of surgical trainees in dedicated general or vascular surgery training programs.ConclusionsSeveral options are currently available for open AAA simulation, all of which demonstrate improved scoring metrics after simulator use. Validated scoring systems, the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills in particular, were most frequently used to deliver objective results. Whereas junior trainees derive the most benefit, senior trainees also showed significant improvements, demonstrating that simulation benefits all levels of surgical trainees. Low numbers of participants were sufficient to achieve statistical benefit within individual studies.     

Functional outcome after open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm

INTRODUCTION: Detailed information on functional outcome after open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair is sparse. Information about functional outcome of open AAA repair is essential to allow comparison of treatment modalities. METHODS: To determine the functional outcome of patients after open repair of AAA, we reviewed 154 consecutive, nonemergency open repairs of infrarenal AAAs between 1990 and 1997 and each patient's medical records. Clinical variables were recorded for each patient, as were multiple outcomes, including ambulatory status, independent living status, current medical condition, and the patient's perception of recovery and satisfaction. Eighty-seven patients or their families were available for current telephone interview to obtain information about objective functional activities, including walking and driving, and subjective functional information, including assessment of complete recovery and willingness to undergo AAA repair again. Chart data were available for all 154 patients. RESULTS: There were 42 women and 112 men. A total of 139 operations were elective, and 15 were urgent. The operative mortality rate was 4%, mean hospital stay was 10.7 +/- 1.3 days, and mean intensive care unit stay was 4.57 +/- 1.17 days. Seventeen (11%) patients required transfer to a skilled nursing facility with a mean stay of 3.66 +/- 2.9 months. All patients were ambulatory preoperatively, whereas at last follow-up (median, 25 months; range, 0.13-108.5 months), 100 (64%) of the patients remained ambulatory, 34 (22%) required assistance, and 12 (14%) were nonambulatory. At current assessment by telephone interview, 33% of patients described a decrease in their functional activity including driving, shopping, and traveling compared with their preoperative status, whereas 67% were unchanged. When asked to assess their own degree of recovery, 64% of patients stated that they experienced complete recovery with an average time to recovery of 3.9 months, whereas 33% said they had not fully recovered at a mean follow-up of 34 months. Sixteen (18%) patients said they would not undergo AAA repair again knowing the recovery process, even though they appeared to fully understand the implication of AAA rupture. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing open AAA repair generally experienced significant freedom from surgical complications. However, substantial functional impairment was present. It is unclear whether the functional disability resulted from the AAA surgery or from aging and comorbidities unrelated to surgery.     

Extraperitoneal approach for repair of inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm

Inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms are characterized by dense perianeurysmal fibrosis involving the adjacent organs. Attempts to isolate the aneurysm can lead to operative injuries of these structures, thus increasing the rates of complications and mortality. In the last 12 years 45 patients with inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms underwent aneurysm resection at the Department of Vascular Surgery of the University of Rome. The aneurysm was resected through a standard, midline transperitoneal approach in 39 patients, through a thoracophrenolaparotomy in two patients, and through a left-flank extraperitoneal approach in the last four patients. The extraperitoneal approach simplified aneurysm dissection and aortic clamping with no cases of postoperative morbidity or death. In addition, we reviewed the CT scan findings of 12 patients surgically treated for inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm. The amount of fibrosis in the anterior wall of the aneurysm was greater than in the left posterolateral aspect (p = 0.008). We conclude that the left-flank extraperitoneal approach is the most anatomically advantageous route for repair of inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm.     

Randomized study comparing cardiac response in endovascular and open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

BACKGROUND: The aim was to compare the cardiac response and the incidence of adverse cardiac events during and after endovascular (EVAR) and open (OR) repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). METHODS: Seventy-six patients with an AAA suitable for EVAR, and in a general condition allowing open surgery were randomized to EVAR (57 patients) or OR (19 patients). The analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis. Haemodynamic variables were assessed intraoperatively before, during and after aortic occlusion. During the procedure myocardial ischaemia was identified with use of electrocardiography (ECG) and transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE). After operation, cardiac complications were diagnosed by clinical observation, 12-lead ECG at 1 h, 1 day and 7 days, echocardiography at 1 month and measurement of cardiac enzymes. RESULTS: After aortic occlusion, a greater decrease in systemic vascular resistance compared with baseline was observed with OR than with EVAR (- 396 and - 70 dyne s/cm5 respectively; P = 0.03). The stroke work index, as a direct measure of myocardial performance, demonstrated a decrease during OR and an increase during EVAR during aortic occlusion (- 6.6 and + 1.7 g m/m2 respectively; P = 0.03) as well as after aortic occlusion (- 7.6 and + 3.4 g m/m2 respectively; P < 0.01), compared with baseline. The incidence of postoperative clinical cardiac complications was comparable in the two study groups; however, myocardial ischaemia, as observed by ECG and TEE, was observed more frequently in the OR group (ten of 19 versus 15 of 57 patients; P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Haemodynamic changes were less severe and there was a lower incidence of myocardial ischaemia during EVAR than during OR. Studies are needed to demonstrate whether this may reduce the operative mortality rate.     

Endoleaks following conventional open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: to describe the complication of following conventional open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. DESIGN: prospective case study. SETTING: two specialist vascular surgical centres. PATIENTS AND METHODS: six patients who had successful conventional open AAA repair. RESULTS: six patients presented with back or abdominal pain or hypotension between one and eighteen months later. An endoleak at the distal anastomosis was noted in five of the cases and one endoleak at the proximal anastomosis. All six cases were successfully repaired; two of these patients required Dacron graft replacement, whilst in four cases only direct resuturing was needed. There was no evidence of infection. CONCLUSIONS: an endoleak is not a phenomenon confined to stent grafts. It should be considered in all patients who present with back or abdominal pain within eighteen months of open AAA repair. The combination of computed tomography (CT) scan and digital subtraction angiography is most useful for preoperative diagnosis.     

腹主动脉瘤血管腔内治疗与开放手术治疗的疗效比较

目的 比较腹主动脉瘤血管腔内治疗与开放手术治疗的近期疗效。方法 对34例肾下型腹主动脉瘤患者的临床资料进行分析，比较腔内治疗组（15例）与传统开放手术治疗组（19例）的术前状况、手术相关情况、术后并发症、死亡率及手术前后的实验室检查数据。结果 腔内组术中出血量和输血量明显少于手术组（P=0．005、P=0．015），腔内组术后平均禁食时间和平均住院时间较手术组明显缩短（P〈0．0l、P：0．001）。手术组术后并发症发生率明显高于腔内组（P〈0．01）。术后第3天白细胞计数腔内组明显低于手术组（P=0．020）；术后第5天红细胞计数及血肌酐水平在腔内组均明显高于手术组（P=0．011、P=0．034）。结论 腹主动脉瘤血管腔内治疗具有安全、微创、对人体内环境干扰小的优点，近期疗效较传统开放手术好。     

Recurrent symptomatic aortic sac seroma after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

The expansion of an abdominal aortic aneurysm sac after conventional repair has been rarely described. All cases in the literature have been associated with polytetrafluoroethylene grafts and perigraft seromas. We present a patient with a recurrent, symptomatic periaortic graft seroma after conventional repair. The etiology of this problem along with its potential increasing significance in the endovascular era is reviewed.     

Simultaneous endovascular exclusion of thoracic aortic aneurysm with open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of aneurysms at multiple sites within the aorta is problematic. METHODS: Between March 2002 and June 2003 in the Department of General, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw six patients with coexisting abdominal and descending thoracic aortic aneurysms underwent simultaneous open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair and endoluminal thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) repair. The indication for a combined procedure was a diagnosed descending TAA and AAA with no significant risk factors for open aortic surgery or technical contraindications for endovascular treatment of TAA. RESULTS: One patient died in the peri-operative period while the other five patients all recovered well after surgery and were discharged with both aneurysms excluded. CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment of TAA combined with a simultaneous open AAA repair is an efficient and relatively safe treatment modality in patients with TAA and AAA disqualified from endovascular repair. The fact that thoracotomy is not a necessity significantly lowers the complication rate in these patients.     

腔内修复与开放手术治疗腹主动脉瘤的疗效比较

目的 比较腹主动脉瘤开放手术和腔内治疗的效果.方法 对223例分别行开放手术和腔内修复的腹主动脉瘤患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,对手术相关情况、围手术期及随访中并发症发生率、生存率、生存质量以及与住院相关的费用进行了对比分析.结果 腔内修复组手术时间、术中出血量、输血量均少于开放手术组(P<0.01);两组围手术期并发症比较无显著差异(P>0.05);SF-36量表评估显示术后6个月开放手术组生活质量优于腔内治疗组,两组术后2年生存率比较无显著差异(P>0.05),但腔内修复组并发症发生率高于开放手术组(P<0.01).住院费用腔内修复组明显高于开放手术组(P<0.01).结论 腹主动脉瘤腔内修复具有手术时间短、微创的特点,但具有较高的远期并发症;开放手术组术后6个月健康生存质量优于腔内修复组.     

Functional outcome after open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

BACKGROUND: Outcome after operative repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has traditionally been assessed in terms of survival. This study examines the functional outcome of patients who survive operation. METHODS: Consecutive patients who survived open repair over an 18-month period were entered into a prospective case-control study. Age- and sex-matched controls were identified from patients undergoing elective AAA repair. The Short Form-36 health survey was administered to both groups of patients at 6 months after operation. Results were compared with the expected scores for an age- and sex-matched normal UK population. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients underwent open repair of a ruptured AAA, and 30 survived; no patient was lost to follow-up. There were no significant differences in quality of life between patients who had an emergency repair and those who had an elective repair. Both of these groups had poorer health-related quality of life outcomes than the matched normal population. Surprisingly, compared with the normal population, patients after elective repair had poorer outcomes in more health domains than patients who survived emergency operation. CONCLUSIONS: Survivors of ruptured AAA repair have a good functional outcome within 6 months of operation.