Effects of glimepiride and glyburide on glucose counterregulation and recovery from hypoglycemia

Severe hypoglycemia, the most serious side effect of sulfonylurea therapy, has been reported to occur more frequently with glyburide than glimepiride. The present studies were undertaken to test the hypothesis that a differential effect on glucagon secretion may be involved. We performed hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemic (approximately 2.5 mmol/L) clamps in 16 healthy volunteers who received in randomized order placebo, glyburide (10 mg), and glimepiride (4 mg) just before beginning the insulin infusion and measured plasma glucagon, insulin, C-peptide, glucagon, epinephrine, cortisol, and growth hormone levels during the clamp and during a 3-hour recovery period after discontinuation of the insulin infusion. Neither sulfonylurea altered glucagon responses or those of other counterregulatory hormones (except cortisol) during the clamp. However, glyburide delayed plasma glucose recovery from hypoglycemia (plasma glucose at end of recovery period: control, 4.9 +/- 0.2 mmol/L; glyburide, 3.7 +/- 0.2 mmol/L; P = .0001; glimepiride, 4.5 +/- 0.2 mmol/L; P = .08). Despite lower plasma glucose levels, glyburide stimulated insulin secretion during this period (0.89 +/- 0.13 vs 1.47 +/- 0.15 pmol x kg(-1) x min(-1), control vs glyburide; P = .001), whereas glimepiride did not (P = .08). Short-term administration of glyburide or glimepiride did not alter glucagon responses during hypoglycemia. In contrast, during recovery from hypoglycemia, glyburide but not glimepiride inappropriately stimulates insulin secretion at low plasma glucose levels. This differential effect on insulin secretion may be an important factor in explaining why glyburide causes severe hypoglycemia more frequently than glimepiride.     

Effects of weight loss and reduced hyperglycemia on the kinetics of insulin secretion in obese non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus

Impairment in pancreatic production of insulin, a cardinal feature of noninsulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), was quantified and the kinetics of insulin secretion characterized in six obese individuals with NIDDM before and after weight loss (18.0 +/- 3.0 kg, mean +/- SEM) using a validated mathematical model that employs C-peptide as a marker of the in vivo rate of insulin secretion. The metabolic clearance of C-peptide, assessed by decay analysis after bolus injection of biosynthetic human C-peptide, was not changed by weight loss (0.143 +/- 0.009 L/min.m2 vs. 0.137 +/- 0.010 L/min.m2). Kinetic parameters from each individual's decay curve before and after weight loss were used to derive accurate rates of secretion during the basal (postabsorptive) state, an oral glucose tolerance test and two hyperglycemic clamps. Basal rates of insulin secretion declined 20 +/- 5 pmol/min.m2 (96 +/- 15 to 76 +/- 15 pmol/min.m2, P less than 0.05) concomitant with decreases of 6.9 +/- 0.9 mmol/L in fasting serum glucose (13.7 +/- 1.0 to 6.8 +/- 0.7 mmol/L, P less than 0.05), 60 +/- 14 pmol/L in serum insulin (134 +/- 30 to 74 +/- 15 pmol/L, P less than 0.05), and 0.15 +/- 0.03 pmol/ml in plasma C-peptide (0.67 +/- 0.11 to 0.52 +/- 0.08 pmol/ml, P less than 0.05) concentrations. As expected, weight loss resulted in improved glucose tolerance as measured by the glycemic profiles during the oral glucose tolerance test (P less than 0.05 analysis of variance). The insulin secretory response before weight loss showed a markedly reduced ability to respond appropriately to an increase in the ambient serum glucose. After weight loss, the pancreatic response was more dynamic (P less than 0.05, analysis of variance) and parralleled the moment-to-moment changes in glycemia. Insulin production above basal doubled (11.2 +/- 3.2 to 24.5 +/- 5.8 nmol/6h.m2, P less than 0.05) and peak rates of insulin secretion above basal tripled (55 +/- 16 to 157 +/- 32 pmol/min/m2, P less than 0.05). To assess the beta-cell response to glucose per se and the changes associated with weight reduction, two hyperglycemic clamps were performed at steady state glucose levels in the range characteristic of individuals with severe NIDDM. At a fixed glycemia of 20 mmol/L, average rates of insulin secretion increased almost 2-fold with treatment (161 +/- 41 to 277 +/- 60 pmol/min.m2, P less than 0.05). At an increment of 6 mmol/L glucose above prevailing fasting glucose levels, the average rate of insulin secretion increased 53% (120 +/- 21 to 183 +/- 39 pmol/min.m2, P less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Insulin and glucagon secretion are suppressed equally during both hyper- and euglycemia by moderate hyperinsulinemia in patients with diabetes mellitus

Hyper- and euglycemic clamp studies were performed in patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus to examine the effects of exogenous insulin administration on insulin and glucagon secretion. Plasma glucose was kept at the fasting level [mean, 10.0 +/- 0.2 (+/- SE) mmol/L; hyperglycemic clamp], and graded doses of insulin (1, 3, and 10 mU/kg.min, each for 50 min) were infused. The plasma C-peptide level gradually decreased from 523 +/- 66 to 291 +/- 43 pmol/L (n = 13; P less than 0.005) by the end of the hyperglycemic clamp study. After 90 min of equilibration with euglycemia (5.4 +/- 0.1 mmol/L; euglycemic clamp), the same insulin infusion protocol caused a similar decrease in the plasma C-peptide level. With the same glucose clamp protocol, physiological hyperinsulinemia for 150 min (676 +/- 40 pmol/L), obtained by the infusion of 2 mU/kg.min insulin, caused suppression of the plasma C-peptide level from 536 +/- 119 to 273 +/- 65 pmol/L during hyperglycemia and from 268 +/- 41 to 151 +/- 23 pmol/L during euglycemia (n = 9; P less than 0.005 in each clamp). Plasma glucagon was suppressed to a similar degree in both glycemic states. These results demonstrate that 1) insulin secretion in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus is suppressed by high physiological doses of exogenous insulin in both the hyper- and euglycemic states, the degree of inhibition being independent of the plasma glucose level; and 2) glucagon secretion is also inhibited by such doses of exogenous insulin.     

Compared to glibenclamide, repaglinide treatment results in a more rapid fall in glucose level and beta-cell secretion after glucose stimulation

BACKGROUND: The more rapid onset of action and the shorter half-life of repaglinide may reduce the post-load glucose excursion and limit sustained insulin secretion compared to sulphonylurea (SU) derivatives. METHODS: We studied 12 patients with type 2 diabetes (age 62 +/- 2 years, BMI 28.3 +/- 1.3 kg m(-2), HbA1c 6.7 +/- 0.2%) on SU monotherapy at submaximal dose. Patients were treated for 3 weeks with repaglinide or glibenclamide in a randomized, crossover trial. At the end of each treatment period, patients underwent a 60-min hyperglycaemic clamp (glucose 12 mmol L(-1)) followed by 4-h observation (60-300 min) with frequent blood sampling for determination of glucose, insulin, proinsulin and C-peptide levels. Before the clamp (5 min for repaglinide, 30 min for glibenclamide), patients ingested their usual morning drug dose. RESULTS: After the end of the hyperglycaemic clamp, mean plasma glucose fell to a level of 5 mmol L(-1) after approximately 150 min with repaglinide, and after approximately 190 min with glibenclamide. While initially quite similar, in the period from 240 to 300 min, insulin, proinsulin and C-peptide levels were lower during repaglinide treatment (insulin 133 +/- 20 vs 153 +/- 25 pmol L(-1) (P < 0.05), proinsulin 14 +/- 3 vs 19 +/- 4 pmol L(-1) (P = 0.06) and C-peptide 0.81 +/- 0.19 vs 1.14 +/- 0.18 nmol L(-1) (P = 0.05) for repaglinide vs glibenclamide, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Following glucose stimulation, plasma glucose levels, and insulin concentration decrease more rapidly after repaglinide treatment than after glibenclamide. Proinsulin and C-peptide secretion tended to fall more rapidly as well. These findings are consistent with a more rapid onset and shorter duration of beta-cell stimulation associated with repaglinide.     

Insulin and C-peptide responses to 75 g oral glucose load in the healthy man

Plasma insulin and C-peptide levels in the fasting state and after a 2-h 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in a large number of healthy subjects are reported. 247 volunteers (134 males, 113 females), aged 13-69 years, who had a negative history of diabetes, no history of significant disease, normal physical examination, normal body weight, normal glucose tolerance, normal blood tests, and who were taking no drugs were studied. Results, mean +/- SEM (range): fasting glucose concentration = 4.64 +/- 0.03 mmol/l (3.10 - 6.10), 1-h glucose concentration = 5.23 +/- 0.10 mmol/l (2.20 - 9.90), 2-h glucose concentration = 4.11 +/- 0.06 mmol/l (2.00 - 6.80); fasting insulin level = 0.088 +/- 0.002 nmol/l (0.03 - 0.28), 1-h insulin level = 0.45 +/- 0.01 nmol/l (0.06 - 1.63), 2-h insulin level = 0.24 +/- 0.01 nmol/l (0.05 - 1.12); fasting C-peptide concentration = 0.60 +/- 0.01 nmol/l (0.14 - 1.34), 1-h C-peptide concentration = 2.17 +/- 0.05 (0.63 - 8.56), 2-h C-peptide concentration = 1.77 +/- 0.04 nmol/(0.35 - 5.74). Fasting insulin and fasting C-peptide concentrations correlated to post-glucose insulin and C-peptide concentrations, respectively. At each sampling-point insulin concentration correlated to C-peptide concentration. After glucose ingestion, both insulin and C-peptide plasma levels correlated significantly with the corresponding glucose levels. During fasting, C-peptide but no insulin level correlated to glucose level.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Pancreatic beta-cell defects in women at risk of type 2 diabetes

We evaluated insulin release and insulin sensitivity in women with basal and/or postprandial hyperglycemia but normal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in previous pregnancy (GHG). These women were individually matched with females without previous hyperglycemia (NGT). Both groups consisted of normal glucose-tolerant women at the time of this study. They underwent OGTT (75 g; n=32 pairs) and hyperglycemic clamp experiments (10 mmoll(-1); n=27 pairs) with plasma glucose, insulin, and C-peptide measurements and calculation of insulinogenic index, first- and second-phase insulin release, and insulin sensitivity index (ISI). The GHG group showed higher glycosylated hemoglobin levels (6.2+/-0.6% versus 5.8+/-0.8%; P<0.05); lower insulinogenic index at 30 min (134.03+/-62.69 pmol mmol(-1) versus 181.59+/-70.26 pmol mmoll(-1); P<0.05) and diminished C-peptide response in relation to glucose (4.05+/-0.36 nmol mmol(-1) versus 4.23+/-0.36 nmol mmol(-1); P<0.05) at OGTT. Both groups did not show difference in insulin secretion and ISI by hyperglycemic clamp technique. We concluded that in up to 12 years from index pregnancy, women with previous GHG, presenting normal glucose tolerance and well-matched with their controls, showed beta-cell dysfunction without change in ISI. As women with previous GHG are at risk of type 2 diabetes, beta-cell dysfunction may be its primary defect.     

Insulinotropic properties of synthetic human gastric inhibitory polypeptide in man: interactions with glucose, phenylalanine, and cholecystokinin-8

The quantitative contribution of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide [gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP)] to the incretin effect after oral glucose (augmentation of insulin secretion over the degree that is explained by the glycemic rise) is not known. Therefore, hyperglycemic clamp experiments (8 mmol/L, corresponding to postprandial glucose concentrations) were performed in healthy volunteers, and synthetic human GIP was infused for 60 min at a rate (approximately 1.3 pmol/kg.min) that results in plasma GIP concentrations similar to those occurring after oral glucose loads of 75 g. The MCR for exogenous GIP was approximately 6 mL/kg.min; the decay after ceasing infusion was exponential with a t1/2 of about 18 min, and the resulting volume of distribution was about 140 mL/kg. At euglycemic (basal) plasma glucose concentrations (5.0 mmol/L) similar values were found. Insulin secretion was stimulated by hyperglycemia alone, but was greatly (2.3-fold based on C-peptide) potentiated by GIP infusions (P less than or equal to 0.001 for integrated incremental values). When integrated incremental responses over 120 min of GIP, immunoreactive insulin, and immunoreactive C-peptide were compared after oral glucose and during GIP infusions, no significant differences were found. Peak glucose concentrations after oral glucose (7.6 +/- 0.6 mmol/L) were similar to mean plasma glucose values during clamp experiments (8.2 +/- 0.1 mmol/L; P = 0.124). However, mean glucose concentrations after oral glucose were lower (6.0 +/- 0.3 mmol/L; P = 0.0004). Additional infusion of sulfated cholecystokinin-8 (25 pmol/kg.h) or the amino acid phenylalanine (1.7 mumol/kg.min) did not further stimulate insulin secretion and had no influence on the pharmacokinetics of exogenous GIP. It is concluded that human synthetic GIP is insulinotropic in man and that this activity may well explain a substantial part of the incretin effect after oral glucose. There is no interaction with cholecystokinin or phenylalanine in concentrations found after mixed meals.     

Influence of gliclazide on glucose-stimulated insulin release in man

Although sulfonylureas (SU) are widely used in the management of patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), there is still debate about their mechanism of action on the pancreatic beta cell. It is unclear whether the effect of SU on insulin release is additive to the effect of glucose, or whether SU act by increasing pancreatic beta-cell sensitivity to glucose (a shift in the dose-response curve of glucose-stimulated insulin release without a change in maximum release). To address this issue, we assessed the influence of the SU gliclazide on glucose-stimulated insulin release in eight healthy male volunteers. Sixty-minute hyperglycemic glucose clamps (blood glucose levels: 8 mmol/L, a submaximal stimulus; and 32 mmol/L, a maximally stimulating concentration) were performed with and without prior oral administration of gliclazide (80 mg) 30 minutes before the glucose clamp. Mean plasma C-peptide increment at 5 minutes (first-phase secretion) obtained during the 8-mmol/L hyperglycemic clamp, was higher on the gliclazide study day than on the control day (1.07 +/- 0.10 v 0.88 +/- 0.10 mmol/L, P less than .05), whereas no difference in plasma C-peptide response was observed during the 32-mmol/L hyperglycemic clamp. Mean plasma C-peptide increment obtained at the end 60 minutes; (second-phase secretion) of the 8-mmol/L hyperglycemic clamps was higher on the gliclazide study day than on the control day (1.36 +/- 0.13 v 1.09 +/- 0.09 mmol/L, P less than .02). No difference was observed in plasma C-peptide response at the end of the 32-mmol/L hyperglycemic glucose clamps.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Relationship between insulin sensitivity, insulin secretion and glucose tolerance in cirrhosis

Hepatic insulin extraction is difficult to measure in humans; as a result, the interrelationship between defective insulin secretion and insulin insensitivity in the pathogenesis of glucose intolerance in cirrhosis remains unclear. To reassess this we used recombinant human C-peptide to measure C-peptide clearance in cirrhotic patients and controls and thus derive C-peptide and insulin secretion rates after a 75-gm oral glucose load and during a 10 mmol/L hyperglycemic clamp. Cirrhotic patients were confirmed as insulin-insensitive during a euglycemic clamp (glucose requirement: 4.1 +/- 0.1 mg/kg/min vs. 8.1 +/- 0.5 mg/kg/min; p less than 0.001), which also demonstrated a low insulin metabolic clearance rate (p less than 0.001). Although intolerant after oral glucose, the cirrhotic patients had glucose requirements identical to those of controls during the hyperglycemic clamp (cirrhotic patients: 6.1 +/- 1.0 mg/kg/min; controls: 6.3 +/- 0.7 mg/kg/min), suggesting normal intravenous glucose tolerance. C-peptide MCR was identical in cirrhotic patients (2.93 +/- 0.16 ml/min/kg) and controls (2.96 +/- 0.24 ml/min/kg). Insulin secretion was higher in cirrhotic patients, both fasting (2.13 +/- 0.26 U/hr vs. 1.09 +/- 0.10 U/hr; p less than 0.001) and from min 30 to 90 of the hyperglycemic clamp (5.22 +/- 0.70 U/hr vs. 2.85 +/- 0.22 U/hr; p less than 0.001). However, with oral glucose the rise in serum C-peptide concentration was relatively delayed, and the insulin secretion index (secretion/area under 3-hr glucose curve) was not elevated. Hepatic insulin extraction was reduced both in fasting and during the hyperglycemic clamp (p less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparison of the inhibitory effect of insulin and hypoglycemia on insulin secretion in humans

Although both insulin and hypoglycemia are known to inhibit endogenous insulin secretion, their potency to suppress insulin secretion has not been directly compared thus far. The serum C-peptide concentration was measured during 28 euglycemic and 28 stepwise hypoglycemic (4.1,3.6, 3.1, and 2.6 mmol/L) clamp experiments using either a low-rate (1.5 mU x min(-1) x kg(-1)) or high-rate (15.0 mU x mU(-1) x kg(-1)) insulin infusion. The experiments lasted 6 hours and were performed in 28 lean healthy men. During both the euglycemic and hypoglycemic clamps, serum insulin was approximately 40-fold higher during the high-rates versus low-rate insulin infusion (euglycemia, 24,029 +/- 1,595 v 543 +/- 34 pmol/L; hypoglycemia, 23,624 +/- 1,587 v 622 +/- 32 pmol/L). Under euglycemic conditions, serum C-peptide decreased from 0.54 +/- 0.04 to 0.41 +/- 0.05 nmol/L during the low-rate insulin infusion (P < .05) and from 0.55 +/- 0.07 to 0.27 +/- 0.09 nmol/L during the high-rate insulin infusion (P < .001). Under hypoglycemic conditions, serum C-peptide decreased from 0.50 +/- 0.03 to 0.02 +/- 0.01 nmol/L during the low-rate insulin infusion (P< .001) and from 0.46 +/- 0.07 to 0.02 +/- 0.01 nmol/L during the high-rate insulin infusion (P< .001). In the euglycemic clamp condition, the high-rate insulin infusion reduced the C-peptide concentration more than the low-rate insulin infusion (P < .05). Independent of the rate of insulin infusion, the decrease in C-peptide was distinctly more pronounced during hypoglycemia versus euglycemia (P < .001). These data indicate that insulin inhibits insulin/C-peptide secretion in a dose-dependent manner. Hypoglycemia is a much stronger inhibitor of insulin secretion than insulin itself.     

Preservation of the incretin effect after orthotopic pancreas transplantation in inbred rats.

To establish whether the incretin effect is under neural control, insulin, C-peptide, and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) responses and hepatic insulin clearance were investigated after oral and "isoglycemic" intravenous glucose in 12 inbred rats after denervation of the pancreas by orthotopic transplantation with portal venous drainage (Tx group) and in 12 laparotomized controls (sham group). Effective pancreas denervation was documented by a decreased pancreatic polypeptide (PP) response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia and by decreased levels of norepinephrine and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in pancreatic tissue. Basal and incremental arterial plasma glucose integrated over 180 minutes did not differ between oral and intravenous glucose, but the integrated insulin response (mean +/- SEM) was significantly greater with oral versus intravenous glucose (Tx group, 104.9 +/- 22.0 v 31.0 +/- 4.9 nmol x L(-1) x min, P < .01; sham group, 79.5 +/- 10.6 v 36.6 +/- 5.8 nmol x L(-1) x min, P < .01). The integrated response of C-peptide was similar during both tests (Tx group, 105 +/- 14 v 79 +/- 8 pmol x mL(-1) x min; sham group, 112 +/- 10 v 121 +/- 12 pmol x mL(-1) x min). Hepatic insulin clearance was significantly decreased in both groups by oral compared with intravenous glucose administration (Tx group, 1.3 +/- 0.2 v 3.3 +/- 0.6 mmol/mmol, P < .01; sham group, 1.6 +/- 0.1 v 3.9 +/- 0.6 mmol/mmol, P < .02). The incretin effects for insulin (Tx group, 5.6 +/- 2.7; sham group, 3.0 +/- 0.8) and C-peptide (Tx group, 1.4 +/- 0.2; sham group, 1.1 +/- 0.2), calculated as the ratio of the integrated oral response and integrated intravenous response, and GIP responses to oral and intravenous glucose were not significantly different between the two groups. We conclude that there is preservation of the incretin effect in rats with orthotopically transplanted and hence extrinsically denervated pancreas, thus ruling out the possibility that the autonomic nervous system substantially contributes. Hepatic insulin clearance and insulinotropic hormones such as GIP appear to be more important.     

Elevated basal insulin secretion and normal dynamic insulin sensitivity in borderline hypertension

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Borderline hypertension is often the initial stage of stabilized hypertension. This study aimed to provide insight on insulin behavior and its relationship with glucose metabolism by investigating insulin secretion and hepatic clearance in non-steady-state conditions in borderline hypertensive patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 15 patients (6 F, 9M, 44 +/- 2 yr, 78 +/- 2 kg, systolic pressure 155 +/- 10 mmHg, diastolic 93 +/- 5) and 15 comparable healthy controls. All underwent an intravenous glucose test, with minimal model analysis to measure insulin sensitivity S1, glucose effectiveness SG, insulin pre-hepatic release, hepatic extraction, and insulin appearance rate in the systemic circulation. Basal glucose (3.98 +/- 0.12 vs 3.94 +/- 0.11 mmol/L, hypertensive vs control subjects respectively), i.v. glucose tolerance factor KG (2.0 +/- 0.2 vs 2.2 +/- 0.1% min-1), SG (0.035 +/- 0.004 vs 0.032 +/- 0.007 min-1) and S1 [3.5 +/- 0.5 vs 3.8 +/- 0.3 10(4) min-1 (microU/mL)] were similar, both basal insulin and C-peptide exhibited a marked increase (87 +/- 8 vs 46 +/- 6 pmol/L, p = 0.0003; 637 +/- 62 vs 381 +/- 76 pmol/L, p < 0.03) demonstrating insulin resistance in basal conditions. Insulin secretion per unit volume was greater in patients, both at basal (43 +/- 5 vs 24 +/- 5 pmol/L/min, p = 0.01) and after stimulation (total hormone released = 18 +/- 2 vs 11 +/- 2 nmol/L in 4 h, p = 0.022). Post-hepatic insulin delivery was also elevated (basal = 11 +/- 1 vs 6 +/- 1 pmol/L/min, p < 0.002, total = 5 +/- 1 vs 3 +/- 0.3 nmol/L in 4 h, p = 0.02), while no difference was detected in hepatic extraction (66 +/- 4% vs 66 +/- 3). CONCLUSION: Borderline hypertensive patients display normal glucose tolerance with basal insulin resistance and normal dynamic insulin sensitivity. Peripheral hyperinsulinemia derives from the combination of normal hepatic extraction with an overproduction of hormone, mostly due to the basal component. Because borderline hypertension often degenerates into overt disease, our results point to a progression that leads to the well-known insulin resistance proper to sustained hypertension.     

Growth hormone treatment of children with short stature increases insulin secretion but does not impair glucose disposal

Pediatricians willing to administer GH to non-GH-deficient children with short stature are concerned about the potential adverse effects of this hormone on glucose homeostasis and insulin action. This study was designed to determine the effects of GH therapy on carbohydrate metabolism in 10 prepubertal non-GH-deficient children with short stature. After 12 months of treatment with 0.3 U GH/kg BW.day, which resulted in an increase in height velocity from 4.0 +/- 0.3 (+/- SE) to 11.0 +/- 0.4 cm/yr, glucose tolerance was not impaired in these children. Not only were their fasting and postprandial plasma glucose concentrations unchanged from the pretreatment values, but basal glucose turnover did not vary; it was 0.53 +/- 0.04 before and 0.64 +/- 0.06 mmol/m2.min after GH treatment. Using the euglycemic clamp technique, the dose-response curves describing the effects of insulin on glucose disposal were comparable before and after GH treatment. There was a consistent 1.5- to 2-fold increase in plasma insulin and C-peptide concentrations during GH treatment, in both the basal and postprandial states, and after oral glucose or iv glucagon stimulation. We conclude that the GH regimen employed was remarkably effective in increasing growth velocity and devoid of detectable diabetogenic effects during a 1-yr treatment period in these non-GH-deficient children. (glucose, 1 mmol/L = 18 mg/dL; insulin, 1 pmol/L = 0.139 microU/mL; C-peptide, 1 pmol/L = 0.003 ng/ml).     

Different effects of acarbose and glibenclamide on proinsulin and insulin profiles in people with Type 2 diabetes

AIM: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we compared the effect of acarbose (A) and glibenclamide (G) on post-prandial (pp) and 24-h profiles of proinsulin and insulin. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus insufficiently controlled with diet alone were randomised to receive acarbose, 100 mg thrice daily, glibenclamide, 1 mg thrice daily, or placebo. Before and after 16 weeks of treatment, 24-h profiles of proinsulin, insulin and glucose (fasting, 1 h after breakfast and every 3-h for a 24-h period) were measured under metabolic ward conditions with standardised meals. RESULTS: With acarbose, a reduced 24-h level of proinsulin was observed compared with glibenclamide (AUC 1096 +/- 118 vs. 1604 +/- 174 pmol/l per h, P<0.05) at 16 weeks. The breakfast increment of proinsulin was lower with acarbose than glibenclamide (6.8 vs. 19.3 pmol/l, P<0.05) as was the level at that time (37.3 +/- 5.3 vs. 56.4 +/- 7.5 pmol/l, P<0.05). A lower AUC of insulin after treatment was also observed with acarbose than glibenclamide (7.9 +/- 0.9 vs. 14.8 +/- 4.5 nmol/l per h, P<0.05), as also for 1-h increment (81 +/- 26, vs. 380 +/- 120 pmol/l, P<0.01) and 1-h level (325 +/- 30 vs. 621 +/- 132 pmol/l, P<0.01). Acarbose reduced 1-h breakfast glucose increment (baseline 6.3 +/- 0.6, 16-week 3.5 +/- 0.6 mmol/l, P<0.01) and 1-h glucose level (18.1 +/- 1.1 and 14.5 +/- 1.3 mmol/l, P<0.01), whereas glibenclamide did not (6.6 +/- 0.7 vs. 5.4 +/- 0.6 mmol/l and 18.9 +/- 1.5 vs. 15.3 +/- 1.3 mmol/l). CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of circadian excursions of proinsulin and insulin reveals distinct differences in meal-time proinsulin and insulin increment and level between acarbose and glibenclamide whereas fasting levels of these insulin fractions remained unaffected.     

Prehepatic beta-cell secretion during the intravenous glucose tolerance test in humans: application of a combined model of insulin and C-peptide kinetics

A previously introduced method by which prehepatic beta-cell secretion is calculated in vivo from plasma measurements of insulin and C-peptide was applied to data derived from iv glucose tolerance tests performed in normal women. Prehepatic secretory rates calculated using the combined model appeared biphasic in nature after glucose injection. Basal insulin secretion was 63.9 +/- 9.8 pmol/min. The duration of first phase was approximately 5 min, with secretion reaching a peak of 2033 +/- 342 pmol/min. The first phase was followed by a significant refractory period in which the secretory rate fell below basal values. The magnitude of second phase secretion was small relative to first phase secretion and appeared pulsatile in nature. Total integrated insulin secretion was 22.2 +/- 2.7 nmol, of which first phase accounted for 32%, and second phase accounted for the remaining 68%. Total incremental integrated secretion was 10.6 +/- 1.4 nmol, accounting for approximately half of the total insulin secretion. Proportions of first and second phase secretion changed to 66.5% and 33.5%, respectively, with incremental data. This study shows that the combined model of insulin and C-peptide is capable of estimating prehepatic insulin secretion from the iv glucose tolerance test and may provide a useful tool to measure secretion in vivo under various pathological conditions.     

Dose-response characteristics for arginine-stimulated insulin secretion in man and influence of hyperglycemia

To test the hypothesis that glucose only affects the responsiveness (maximum velocity) of the beta-cell to arginine without changing the sensitivity (ED50) of the beta-cell to arginine, we investigated the influence of hyperglycemia on the responsiveness and sensitivity of arginine-induced insulin secretion in eight healthy male volunteers. Plasma C-peptide and insulin levels achieved during infusions of five doses of arginine (30 min) with and without a 60-min hyperglycemic clamp (17 mmol/L) were analyzed using a modified Michaelis-Menten equation. At euglycemia, the ED50 (half-maximally stimulating serum arginine concentration) was significantly less for first phase than for second phase plasma C-peptide secretion (0.7 +/- 0.1 vs. 2.7 +/- 0.4 mmol/L; P less than 0.002). Hyperglycemia significantly increased arginine-induced insulin secretion at all arginine infusion rates (P less than 0.01) without significantly altering the ED50 for either phase. We conclude 1) that the regulation of arginine-induced insulin secretion differs between both phases of insulin secretion, and 2) that a 1-h infusion with glucose significantly potentiates arginine-induced insulin secretion without influencing the difference in regulation of both phases of arginine-induced insulin secretion, supporting the validity of the use of arginine as a secretagogue in studies involving hyperglycemia.     

Peripheral insulin parallels changes in insulin secretion more closely than C-peptide after bolus intravenous glucose administration

The changes in peripheral serum insulin and plasma C-peptide levels and in the insulin secretory rate in response to iv glucose (0.5 g/kg BW) administration were studied in seven normal subjects. Insulin secretory rates were calculated according to a two-compartment model of distribution for C-peptide, using individual C-peptide kinetics calculated from iv bolus injections of biosynthetic human C-peptide. The mean plasma glucose level increased from a fasting level of 5.1 +/- 0.1 (+/- SE) to a peak of 24.0 +/- 1.0 mmol/L at 3 min and reached basal levels 101 +/- 6 min after glucose administration. The mean serum insulin value increased from 50 +/- 12 to a peak of 405 +/- 58 pmol/L at 3 min and then declined to fasting levels 139 +/- 14 min after the stimulus. In contrast, the mean plasma C-peptide level increased from 390 +/- 50 to a peak of 1460 +/- 210 pmol/L at 3 min and only began declining 45 min after glucose administration, reaching fasting levels 191 +/- 15 min after the stimulus. The mean insulin secretory rate increased from 69.8 +/- 19.9 to a peak of 1412.7 +/- 159.1 pmol/min at 3 min (15.3 +/- 2.5-fold elevation over baseline) and reached basal levels 135 +/- 12 min after the stimulus. The clearance of endogenous insulin during the basal period (2.505 +/- 0.365 L/min) and that during the 4 h after the stimulus (2.319 +/- 0.230 L/min) were similar. In conclusion, after bolus iv glucose administration: 1) the insulin secretory rate is more closely represented by changes in peripheral serum insulin than in plasma C-peptide levels; and 2) no change in endogenous insulin clearance occurs.     

Similar insulin secretory response to a gastric inhibitory polypeptide bolus injection at euglycemia in first-degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes and control subjects

Insulin secretion following the intravenous infusion of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) is diminished in patients with type 2 diabetes and at least a subgroup of their first-degree relatives at hyperglycemic clamp conditions. Therefore, we studied the effects of an intravenous bolus administration of GIP at normoglycemic conditions in the fasting state. Ten healthy control subjects were studied with an intravenous bolus administration of placebo, and of 7, 20, and 60 pmol GIP/kg body weight (BW), respectively. Forty-five first-degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes and 33 matched control subjects were studied with (1) a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and (2) an intravenous bolus injection of 20 pmol GIP/kg BW with blood samples drawn over 30 minutes for determination of plasma glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and GIP. Statistical analysis applied repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan's post hoc tests. Insulin secretion was stimulated after the administration of 20 and of 60 pmol GIP/kg BW in the dose-response experiments (P <.0001). GIP administration (20 pmol/kg BW) led to a significant rise of insulin and C-peptide concentrations in the first-degree relatives and control subjects (P <.0001), but there was difference between groups (P =.64 and P =.87, respectively). Also expressed as increments over baseline, no differences were apparent (Delta(insulin), 7.6 +/- 1.2 and 7.6 +/- 1.6 mU/L, P =.99; Delta(C-peptide), 0.35 +/- 0.06 and 0.38 +/- 0.08 ng/mL, P =.75). Integrated insulin and C-peptide responses after GIP administration significantly correlated with the respective insulin and C-peptide responses after glucose ingestion (insulin, r = 0.78, P <.0001; C-peptide, r = 0.35, P =.0015). We conclude that a reduced insulinotropic effect of GIP in first-degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes cannot be observed at euglycemia. Therefore, a reduced GIP-induced insulin secretion in patients with type 2 diabetes and their first-degree relatives at hyperglycemia is more likely due to a general defect of B-cell function than to a specific defect of the GIP action.     

Suppression of basal, but not of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion by human insulin in healthy and obese hyperinsulinemic subjects

To evaluate the suppressive effect of biosynthetic human insulin (BHI; 2.5 U/m2 . h) on basal and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in healthy and obese hyperinsulinemic subjects, the plasma C-peptide response was measured during maintenance of euglycemia and hyperglycemia by means of the glucose clamp technique. In five healthy subjects in whom arterial insulin concentration was increased to 94 +/- 8 microU/mL, but euglycemia was maintained at the fasting level. C-peptide concentration fell from 1.3 +/- 1.0 ng/mL by 21 +/- 8% (P less than 0.05). When hyperglycemia of 7 mmol/L above basal was induced by a variable glucose infusion, the C-peptide response was similar in the control (5.0 +/- 0.6 ng/mL) and BHI experiments (4.7 +/- 0.6 ng/mL) and was paralleled by an identical increase in plasma insulin above the prevailing insulin concentration. In seven obese patients plasma C-peptide fell from 3.5 +/- 0.4 to 2.8 +/- 0.5 ng/mL (P less than 0.05) when BHI was infused at the same rate of euglycemia maintained as in the lean subjects. As in healthy subjects, however, the plasma C-peptide response to the hyperglycemic stimulus (8.7 +/- 0.9 ng/mL) was not altered by BHI (7.9 +/- 0.8 ng/mL). Glucose utilization as determined by the glucose infusion rate necessary to maintain the desired glucose level was reduced by half in the obese patients compared with that of normal subjects. From these data we conclude that in healthy as well as obese hyperinsulinemic subjects, insulin at concentrations capable of suppressing its basal secretion fails to suppress its glucose-stimulated secretion.     

Differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of insulin lispro and aspart in healthy volunteers.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of the rapid-acting insulin analogues lispro and aspart were compared in a randomized, double-blind crossover study of 20 fasting healthy men following a single subcutaneous injection. Either insulin lispro or aspart, 0.05 U/kg-body-weight, was injected subcutaneously and followed by determination of 5-h profiles of plasma glucose, serum C-peptide and insulin concentrations. Lowest glucose concentrations were observed after 50 min in the aspart group (3.2 +/- 0.1 mmol/l versus lispro 3.5 +/- 0.1 mmol/l; p = 0.026) and after 60 min in the lispro group (3.4 +/- 0.1 mmol/l). For blood glucose t min was 59.3 +/- 3.4 min in the aspart and 63.5 +/- 5.3 min in the lispro group (ns). After 40 min a lower C-peptide was determined for aspart (225 +/- 21 pmol/l versus lispro 309 +/- 33 pmol/l; p = 0.031), whereas minimal C-peptide concentrations were reached in both groups after 105 min (lispro 117 +/- 21 pmol/l versus aspart 105 +/- 18 pmol/l). The maximal concentration of insulin was detected in both groups after 40 min (lispro 20.8 +/- 1.1 mU/l versus aspart 24.6 +/- 1.3 mU/l; p = 0.032). For insulin t max was 33.0 +/- 2.6 min in the aspart versus 33.3 +/- 2.6 min in the lispro group (ns). The present results indicate a more rapid absorption of insulin aspart in comparison to insulin lispro. Higher insulin concentrations after subcutaneus injection may be advantageous in meal-related treatment of diabetes.