Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Background: With the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, an increase in the incidence of bile duct injury two to three times that seen in open cholecystectomy was witnessed. Although some of these injuries were blamed on the ``learning curve,' many occurred long after the surgeon had passed his initial experience. We are still seeing these injuries today. Methods: To better understand the mechanism behind these injuries, in the hope of reducing the injury rate, 177 cases of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy were reviewed. All records were studied, including the initial operative reports and all subsequent treatments. Videotapes of the procedures were available for review in 45 (25%) of the cases. All X-ray studies, including interoperative cholangiograms and ERCPs, were reviewed. Results: The vast majority of the injuries seen in this review (71%) were a direct result of the surgeon misidentifying the anatomy. This misidentification led to ligation and division of the common bile duct in 116 (65%) of the cases. Cholangiograms were performed in only 18% (32 patients) of cases, and in only two patients was the bile duct injury recognized as a result of the cholangiogram. Review of the X-rays showed that in each instance of common bile duct ligation and transection in which a cholangiogram was performed the impending injury was in evidence on the X-ray films but ignored by the surgeon. Conclusions: From this review, several conclusions can be drawn. First and foremost, the majority of bile duct injuries seen with laparoscopic cholecystectomy can either be prevented or minimized if the surgeon adheres to a simple and basic rule of biliary surgery; NO structure is ligated or divided until it is absolutely identified! Cholangiography will not prevent bile duct injury, but if performed properly, it will identify an impending injury before the level of injury is extended. And lastly, the incidence of bile duct injury is not related to the laparoscopic technique but to a failure of the surgeon to translate his knowledge and skills from his open experience to the laparoscopic technique. Received: 14 May 1996/Accepted: 1 July 1996     

Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Surgical Endoscopy -     

Management of ureteral injuries

Ureteral injury is a rare but potential serious complication that can occur during a variety of general surgical procedures. Knowledge of the course of the ureter is the first step toward preventing ureteral injuries. While some injuries are noticed intraoperatively, most are missed and present later with pain, sepsis, urinary drainage or renal loss. The choice of treatment is based on the location, type and extend of ureteral injury. For injuries recognized during open surgery, when involving the distal 5 cm of the ureter, an antireflux ureterocystostomy such as the Politano-Leadbetter procedure or a vesicopsoas hitch can be performed. For the middle ureter, an ureteroureterostomy is satisfactory and for the proximal ureter, most injuries can be managed by transureteroureterostomy. In complex situations intestinal interposition, autotransplantation or even nephrectomy can be considered. The majority of patients with delayed diagnosed ureteral injuries should be managed by an initial endo-urologic approach.     

Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a collective experience of four teaching hospitals and results of repair

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been performed in Singapore since 1990 and, up until the end of 1997, a total of 4445 procedures had been performed in the four major teaching hospitals. Although bile duct injuries were thought to have increased following the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, there have been no reviews done on the incidence of these injuries in the Singapore context. METHODS: The present retrospective review aimed to audit the rate of bile duct injuries in the four major teaching hospitals in Singapore and to document the results of management of these injuries. RESULTS: Of the 4445 procedures performed, there were 19 (0.43%) cases of bile duct injuries. These involved the common hepatic duct (n = 8), common bile duct (n = 10), and the right hepatic duct (n = 1). The underlying gall bladder pathology included non-inflamed gall bladders (n = 10), acute cholecystitis (n = 4), Mirrizzi's syndrome (n = 3) and mucocele of the gall bladder (n = 2). Transection of the duct accounted for the majority of the injuries. Eleven bile duct injuries were identified at the time of operation. These were primarily repaired over a T tube (n = 4) or by a bilio-enteric bypass (n = 7). The remainder were diagnosed at a median of 7 days (range: 1-556 days) after surgery with a presentation of jaundice or pain. These were repaired by bilio-enteric anastomosis (n = 7) and closure over a T tube (n = 1). Three patients developed strictures subsequently, two following bilio-enteric repair after delayed diagnosis and one following immediate primary repair over a T tube. One patient developed intrahepatic stones and required a left lateral segmentectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The experience of a 0.43% bile duct injury rate is comparable to the best results from most large series in the West. Inflammation at Calot's triangle is an important associated factor for injury. Early recognition and prompt repair affords good results, and hepaticojejunostomy is recommended as the repair of choice.     

腹腔镜胆囊切除胆管合并血管损伤

血管损伤是与腹腔镜胆囊切除胆管损伤相关的严重并发症,其发生率为6.7%～61.1%.损伤最多的是肝右动脉.血管损伤后不一定有症状,但严重者近期表现为肝缺血、坏死,远期可导致胆管狭窄、肝萎缩等.有的患者血管损伤后需行肝切除甚至肝移植治疗,因此对早期发现的血管损伤,必要时应做血管重建.     

Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: management and outcome

The aim of this study is to analyze our experience with the management of bile duct injuries (BDIs) following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). From 1996 to 2004, 21 patients with BDI after LC were treated in our department. The BDIs were graded according to the classification of Strasberg. Ten patients had minor BDI. Minor injuries were classified as A in six and D in four patients. In three patients, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography sphincterotomy and stent placement was adequate treatment. Six patients required laparotomy and bile duct ligation or suturing, and one patient underwent laparoscopy with additional ligation of a duct of Luschka. Eleven patients had major BDIs. These injuries were classified as E1 in two, E2 in three, E3 in four, and E4 in two patients. Among the patients with a major BDI, Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy was performed. After a median follow-up of 69.45 months, no evidence of biliary disease has been detected among our patients. BDIs should be managed in a specialist unit where surgeons skilled to perform such repairs should undertake definitive treatment. Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy is the procedure of choice in the management of major BDIs as it is accompanied by satisfactory results.     

Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: primary and long-term results from a single institution

Background Iatrogenic bile duct injury carries high morbidity. After the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy the incidence of these injuries has at least doubled, and even after the learning curve, the incidence has plateaued at the level of 0.5%. Methods A total of 32 patients sustained biliary tract injuries of the 3736 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed in and around Turku University Central Hospital between January 1995 and April 2002. The data concerning primary treatment and long-term results were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Results The overall incidence for bile duct injuries, including all the minor injuries (cystic duct leaks and bile duct strictures), was 0.86%; for major injuries alone the incidence was 0.38%. Nineteen percent of the injuries were detected intraoperatively. All the cystic duct leaks were treated endoscopically with a 90% success rate. Of the bile duct strictures 88% were treated successfully with endoscopic techniques. Ninety-three percent of the major injuries, including tangential lesions of common bile duct and total transections, were treated operatively. The operation of choice was either hepaticojejunostomy or cholangiojejunostomy in 69% of the cases; the rest were treated with simple suturing over a T-tube or an endoscopically placed stent. The long-term results, with a median follow-up period of 7.5 years, are good in 79% of the operated patients and in 84% of the whole study population. Mortality rate was 3% and acute or chronic cholangitis was seen in 13% of the patients during follow-up. Conclusion Most of the minor bile duct injuries, including cystic duct leaks and bile duct strictures, are well treatable with endoscopic techniques, whereas most of the major injuries require operative treatment, which at optimal circumstances gives good results.     

腹腔镜胆囊切除术胆管损伤46例报告

目的探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术（laparoscopic cholecystectomy，LC）中减少或避免胆管损伤的术中判断和操作技巧。方法回顾分析我院1992年10月～2005年10月39860例LC的临床资料，其中胆管损伤46例。结果行胆管裂口修补，置T管支撑引流26例；游离两断端，做端端吻合，T管支撑引流4例。T管支撑时间3～12个月。胆管空肠的Rouxen-Y吻合11例；副肝管结扎5例。胆管狭窄再手术4例，胆肠吻合口狭窄再手术2例。结论深刻的解剖认识，熟练的操作技巧可以避免或减少胆管损伤的发生。早期诊断和处理胆管损伤避免急性炎症期是防止多次胆道手术的重要举措。     

Long-term results of surgical repair of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is associated with an increased incidence of bile duct injuries when compared with the open surgical technique. Long-term results of repaired injuries and hepatic damage associated with chronic biliary obstruction are lacking. METHODS: From Aug 1, 1991 until Dec 1, 1999, there were 27 patients referred for management of complex biliary injuries that occurred during LC. Patients underwent percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and placement of transhepatic catheters with computed tomography-guided biloma drainage when indicated. On the basis of the cholangiography findings, patients underwent Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) and liver biopsy or were treated with nonsurgical interventions. RESULTS: Twenty-one of 27 patients (77. 8%) underwent HJ, and 16 of these 21 patients (76.2%) also underwent hepatic biopsy. In 1 patient, a recurrent stricture developed at 20 months after the initial repair; and, in a second patient, an episode of cholangitis developed in the postoperative period with the transhepatic catheters in place. Five of 16 patients (31.2%) demonstrated marked hepatic fibrosis with 4 (25%) of these patients showing evidence of evolving cirrhosis at the time of HJ. CONCLUSIONS: In this series with 55 months of follow-up, HJ repair of LC injuries was associated with an initial 95.2% success rate and an ultimate success rate of 100%. Despite this, delayed referral, averaging 12 months, was associated with significant hepatic injury in 5 of 16 (31.3%) patients who underwent biopsy.     

腹腔镜胆囊切除致胆道损伤26例分析

目的 探讨腹腔镜抻囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)致胆管损伤的原因、类型、临床表现、诊断及处理原则. 方法回顾性分析1997-2007年收治的26例LC致胆管损伤的临床资料.结果 胆管损伤Ⅰ型5例、Ⅱ型13例、Ⅲ型2例、Ⅳ型6例;3例术中发现胆管损伤并中转开腹,23例术后发现胆管损伤,其中13例为LC术后1周内发现,8例为术后20～60 d发现,2例在术后2年表现反复胆管炎发作的症状;24例接受介入治疗,其中5例获得治愈,19例在胆管炎和黄疸控制后获得手术;切除毁损胆管20例,行肝总管或左右肝管的胆肠吻合术.结论 胆道损伤是严重的LC术后并发症,应高度警惕.合理运用介入或手术的方法及时进行必要的胆管内支撑和通畅的胆汁外引流,应避免再次医源性损伤和修补术后胆道再狭窄.     

Bile duct injuries during open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the laparoscopic era: alarming trends

Background  

After the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), scientific discussion and concern about iatrogenic bile duct injuries (BDIs) have been limited mostly to BDIs sustained in LC, while BDIs sustained in open cholecystectomy (OC) and in all cholecystectomies have not been the center of attention.     

Bile duct complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Summary A retrospective review and analysis of patients referred to the Division of Gastroenterology and the Section of Gastrointestinal Surgery with common bile duct complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy was undertaken in order to identify injury patterns, management, and outcome. Sixteen patients were identified over a 20-month period. Twelve patients had major common bile duct injuries and four had minor injuries (cystic duct leaks). Seventy-one percent of injuries occurred with surgeons who had done more than 13 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Eighty-three percent of patients who had major ductal injury did not have a cholangiogram prior to the injury. Sixteen percent of patients with major common bile duct injuries had findings of acute cholecystitis and 58% of these major injuries were easy gallbladders. One-third of major injuries were recognized at operation. Two-thirds of immediate repairs failed. All cystic duct leaks were managed nonoperatively.It appears that bile duct complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy are more common in the community than is reported. Bile duct complications occur with surgeons who are experienced and inexperienced with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Common bile duct injuries, unrecognized at laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the majority of cases, usually occur with easy gallbladders. Operative cholangiography is not utilized in the majority of common bile duct injuries. When immediate repair of common bile duct injuries is undertaken, the majority are unsuccessful. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is invaluable in the diagnosis and management of bile duct complications. Cystic duct leaks may be managed successfully with endoscopic stents.Presented at the annual SAGES meeting, April 10–12, 1992, Washington, D.C.     

Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Background: Forty series reporting experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the United States from 1989 to 1995 were reviewed. A total of 114,005 cases were analyzed and 561 major bile duct injuries (0.50%) and 401 bile leaks from the cystic duct or liver bed (0.38%) were recorded. Intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) was attempted in 41.5% of the laparoscopic cholecystectomies and was successful in 82.7%. In major bile duct injuries, the common bile duct/common hepatic duct were the most frequently injured (61.1%) and only 1.4% of the patients had complete transection. Methods: When reported, most of the bile duct injuries were managed surgically with a biliary-enteric anastomosis (41.8%) or via laparotomy and t-tube or stent placement (27.5%). The long-term success rate could not be determined because of the small number of series reporting this information. The management for bile leaks usually consisted of a drainage procedure (55.3%) performed endoscopically, percutaneously, or operatively. Results: The morbidity for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, excluding bile duct injuries or leaks, was 5.4% and the overall mortality was 0.06%. It was also noted that the conversion rate to an open procedure was 2.16%. Conclusions: It is concluded based on this review of laparoscopic cholecystectomies that the morbidity and mortality rates are similar to open surgery. In addition, the rate of bile duct injuries and leaks is higher than in open cholecystectomy. Furthermore, bile duct injuries can be minimized by lateral retraction of the gallbladder neck and careful dissection of Calot's triangle, the cystic duct–gallbladder junction, and the cystic duct–common bile duct junction. Received: 24 September 1996/Accepted: 28 July 1997     

The risk of biliary ductal injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

The incidence of iatrogenic injuries of the bile ducts has increased significantly since laparascopic cholecystectomy became the "gold standard" in the treatment of cholelithiasis. The incidence of major biliary ductal injury ranges from 0.25% to 0.74%, and of minor injury from 0.28% to 1.7%. The cause of the injury is not always clearly identifiable. In more than half the cases, the injury occurs during maneuvers to isolate the cystic duct or to free the gallbladder from the common bile duct. These maneuvers may be more difficult and consequently more dangerous when there is significant inflammation as may be seen in acute cholecystitis, or in case of obesity, cirrhosis with portal hypertension, previous surgery with peritoneal adhesions, or anatomic variations of the hepatic pedicle. Pre-operative evaluation of clinical risk factors should be coupled with intra-operative caution and instrumental evaluation. The increase in frequency of iatrogenic biliary injuries can not be attributed simply to the inexperience of the surgeon or the learning curve as was initially suggested. Many injuries are due, rather, to the surgeon's failure to respect basic technical rules, long established for open cholecystectomy and which should not be modified for the laparoscopic technique. While routine cholangiography does not offer complete protection from iatrogenic ductal injuries, it is essential to visualize the biliary tract whenever a lesion of the ductal system is clearly identified or even suspected. In such cases, facility with the technique of intraoperative cholangiography and a knowledge of the radiological anatomy of the biliary tree are essential for an accurate and complete intraoperative evaluation of the biliary injury. Finally, in the presence of acute or chronic inflammation or other factors for technical difficulty (obesity, cirrhosis, previous surgery, anatomic variations, intraoperative bleeding), the surgeon must not hesitate to consider conversion to an open surgical approach. In such complicated cases, even the open approach is not a guarantee against biliary injury; there is no substitute for experience and caution in biliary surgery.