Eosinophil cationic protein(ECP) and eosinophil protein X (EXP) concentrations in serum and bronchial lavage fluid in asthma. effect of prednisolone treatment.

Background Eoswinophil granule proteins may contribute to hyperresponsiveness in asthma.
Objective To measure eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and eosinophil protein X (EPX) in sereum and bronchial lavage fluid from 20 asthmatics and 16 control subjects. To asses the effect on these eosinophil proteins of corticosteroid treatment of asthma. To determine ehether serum ECP and EPX measured weekly in a longitudina study for 10 weeks reflected changes in lung function.
Methods Eosinophil granule proteins were measured by radiommunoassy of bronchial wash (BW), bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) serum.
Results Eosinophils were elevated in BAL (P<0.01) , BW (P<0.01) and blood (P<0.01) from asthmatic compared with control subjects. Eosinophil cationic protein concentration was significantly elevated in BAL (P<0.05) and BW from asthmatics (P<0.01) and EPX was increased in BAL (P<0.05) and BW (P<0.01) . These changes were also reflected in elevated serum ECP (P<0.01) and EPX (P<0.01) concentrations is asthmatic subjects. There was no significant difference between sujects receiving prednisolone and the placebo group, but there was a fall in ECP in BW (P<0.05) and serum (P<0.01) and in EPX in BW (P<0.01) and serum (P<0.01) within the group receiving prednisolone. In the longitudinal study there was only significant difference between ECP values associated with highest and lowest peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) (P<0.05).
Conclusion These data confirm a role for cosinophil activation in the airway in asthma pathogenesis, and add some support to the hypothesis that corticosteroids may inhibit cosinophil activation in asthma.     

嗜酸性粒细胞阳离子蛋白在支气管哮喘中的研究

嗜酸性粒细胞阳离子蛋白(ECP)是活化嗜酸性细胞释放的强碱性蛋白中的重要组分,是嗜酸性粒细胞活化的重要标志,本文概述了ECP的来源,生物学作用以及与感染的关系,着重综述了ECP与支气管哮喘之间的关系。     

Eosinophil activity markers in peripheral blood have high predictive value for bronchial hyperreactivity in patients with suspected mild asthma

The present study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of eosinophils and markers of their activity for bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) in a population of patients with recently developed clinical symptoms of asthma. The activation of eosinophils was estimated by measuring eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in serum. In addition, flow cytometry was used to measure the expression of the EG2-epitope on intracellular ECP in eosinophils from peripheral blood. Twenty-eight consecutive patients with clinical history of asthma were studied. Of the 28 patients, 18 had a positive bronchial challenge test measured as PD₂₀≤ 1600 μg histamine. A significantly higher concentration of eosinophils and a trend to higher ECP in the peripheral blood was found in the hyperreactive group than in the nonreactive group. However, the intracellular expression of ECP did not correlate with the PD₂₀ value, and no significant difference between the groups was found. With one eosinophil activity marker, either serum ECP or EG2, BHR could be predicted in 70% of the patients. If we combined any two of the activity markers (serum ECP, EG2, or the percentage of eosinophils), the predictive value increased to 100%. We conclude that the blood eosinophil concentration, as well as, to some extent, serum ECP, has a high specificity for BHR in patients with recently developed clinical symptoms of asthma. Despite normal bronchial reactivity, some patients had signs of activated eosinophils, i.e., high serum ECP and increased EG2 expression. Thus, these markers may reflect early stages in the development of BHR. Our results also indicate that a combined evaluation of percentage of eosinophils and of eosinophil activity markers is of clinical value to predict BHR.     

Effects of interleukin (IL)-3 and IL-5 on human eosinophil degranulation induced by complement components C3a and C5a*

It is suggested that eosinophils (Eos) play an important role in the pathogenesis of bronchial asthma by releasing cytotoxic cationic eosinophil granule proteins and damaging bronchial epithelial cells. However, the exact nature of the actual inducer of eosinophil degranulation in vivo is unclear. We examined eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) release from human Eos in response to soluble agonists such as C5a, C3a, platelet-activating factor, and FMLP with or without interleukin (IL)-3 or IL-5 priming. Eosinophil degranulation induced by these soluble agonists required the pretreatment of Eos by cytochalasin B even in IL-3 priming. Among four agonists, C5a was the most effective stimulus of ECP release either with or without IL-5 priming. IL-3 and IL-5 remarkably enhanced ECP release in Eos triggered by C3a and C5a. The enhancement of ECP release by IL-3 and IL-5 occurred at 0.1–0.3 ng/ml and became maximal at 10–30 ng/ml, concentration-dependently. The enhancement of ECP release by cytokines became optimal at an interval of 10 min. Our data support the importance of complement components and cytokines in eosinophil degranulation in vivo.     

Variations of Blood Eosinophils and Eosinophil Cationic Protein in Serum in Patients with Bronchial Asthma

Inhalation challenge test was performed in 12 patients with bronchial asthma. The subsequent variation in blood eosinophils and serum-eosinophil canonic protein was followed up. Uniform patterns in both parameters were seen suggesting active participation of the eosinophil leucocyte in allergic: inflammation.     

Eosinophil chemoattractants in the middle ear of patients with eosinophilic otitis media

BACKGROUND: Patients with intractable otitis media associated with bronchial asthma have an extensive accumulation of eosinophils in the effusion and mucosa of the middle ear; this condition is called eosinophilic otitis media (EOM). It remained to be determined how eosinophils accumulate in the middle ear. OBJECTIVES: To clarify the pathogenesis of middle ear diseases, we measured the concentration of eosinophil chemoattractants in middle ear effusion (MEE), and carried out immunohistochemical studies of middle ear mucosa specimens to demonstrate the expression of eosinophil chemoattractants. METHODS: Middle ear effusion samples were obtained from 15 EOM patients with bronchial asthma and from six controls for the measurement of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), IL-5, eotaxin and regulated on activation, normal T expressed and secreted concentrations. Middle ear mucosa samples were also taken from 14 EOM patients and 16 controls for immunohistochemical study. In 10 EOM patients, the numbers of immunoreactive cells as well as apoptotic cells were determined before and after the topical application of triamcinolone acetonide into the middle ear. RESULTS: In EOM, significantly higher ECP and IL-5 concentrations were detected in MEE than in serum, and ECP, IL-5 and eotaxin concentrations in MEE were higher in the EOM patients than in the controls. ECP concentration positively correlated with that of IL-5. Immunohistochemically, the numbers of cells positive for EG2 and ecalectin were significantly higher in the EOM patients than in the controls. After the topical application of triamcinolone acetonide, the numbers of infiltrating cells and immunoreactive cells distinctly decreased, whereas the number of apoptotic cells significantly increased. CONCLUSION: In EOM, locally produced IL-5 may play a crucial role in the accumulation of eosinophils in the middle ear. Chemokines such as ecalectin and eotaxin are also produced in the middle ear, and help activate and enhance the survival of eosinophils to induce the intractable condition in the middle ear. The topical application of triamcinolone acetonide induces the apoptosis of not only eosinophils but also eosinophil chemoattractant-producing cells, thereby improving the middle ear condition.     

Eosinophilic inflammation in asthma

BACKGROUND AND METHODS. The importance of eosinophils in the pathogenesis of bronchial asthma is not established. In an attempt to evaluate the role of eosinophilic inflammation in asthma, we compared 10 normal subjects with 43 patients with chronic asthma, 19 of whom had severe disease as assessed by a clinical scoring method described by Aas and by pulmonary-function tests. Eosinophils were counted in peripheral blood and bronchoalveolar-lavage fluid, and in biopsy specimens obtained from the patients and post mortem from 8 subjects without asthma, but not from the 10 normal controls. Eosinophil cationic protein was titrated by radioimmunoassay in the bronchoalveolar-lavage fluid from all subjects and studied by immunohistochemistry in the biopsy specimens. RESULTS. There was a significant increase in the number of peripheral-blood eosinophils in the patients that was correlated with the clinical severity of asthma (P less than 0.001) and pulmonary function (P less than 0.03). Levels of eosinophils and eosinophil cationic protein were increased in the bronchoalveolar-lavage fluid from the patients and were also correlated with the severity of asthma (P less than 0.001 and P less than 0.002, respectively). Hematoxylin-eosin staining of bronchial-biopsy specimens showed that intraepithelial eosinophils were present only in patients with asthma. Immunohistochemical analysis of eosinophil cationic protein revealed that normal subjects had only a few nondegranulated eosinophils deep in the submucosa, whereas all the patients had degranulated eosinophils beneath the basement membrane and among epithelial cells. In some patients there was a relation between the presence of degranulated eosinophils and epithelial damage. CONCLUSIONS. Eosinophilic inflammation of the airways is correlated with the severity of asthma. These cells are likely to play a part in the epithelial damage seen in this disease.     

Blood eosinophils,eosinophil-derived proteins,and leukotriene C4 generation in relation to bronchial hyperreactivity in children with atopic dermatitis

To assess the relation among eosinophil-related variables in the peripheral blood, bronchial hyperreactivity, and the presence of atopic dermatitis in children aged 5–14 years, we studied 11 patients with atopic dermatitis alone, six with asthma and atopic dermatitis, 12 with asthma alone, and 12 healthy controls. Eosinophil counts, levels of eosinophil cationic protein, and the capacity of eosinophils to generate leukotriene (LT) C₄, as well as bronchial hyperreactivity and a severity score for atopic dermatitis, were determined. Eosinophil variables were significantly higher in both patient groups with atopic dermatitis than in normal controls. In particular, ionophore A 23187 LTC₄ generation was higher in patients with atopic dermatitis alone (median 82, range 25–273 ng/10⁶ cells) and patients with combined asthma and atopic dermatitis (median 68, range 32–583 ng/10⁶ cells) than in normal controls (median 9, range 1–67 ng/10⁶ cells). However, there was no difference between the group of atopic dermatitis patients with asthma and without asthma. We conclude that eosinophil variables in the peripheral blood are mainly influenced by the presence of atopic dermatitis, and not the presence and the severity of asthma in patients with both asthma and atopic dermatitis.     

Local release of eosinophil peroxidase following segmental allergen provocation in asthma

BACKGROUND: Eosinophil peroxidase (EPO) is an eosinophilic basic protein, which leads to increased permeability and damage of bronchial epithelial cells in asthma. OBJECTIVE: As little is known about its local expression and release in humans the intracellular expression in lung and peripheral eosinophils and the concentrations of EPO in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid and serum was investigated in patients with asthma. METHODS: Twelve mild atopic asthmatic and nine control subjects underwent segmental sham and allergen challenge. EPO concentrations in BAL fluid and serum were determined by immunoassay and flow cytometry was used to determine the intracellular expression of EPO in BAL-derived and peripheral eosinophils. RESULTS: In asthmatic patients a large increase in BAL eosinophils--total cells: median 9.5 x 10(6) (range: 0.5 to 455.0 x 10(6)); relative: 38% (1 to 91%)--was detectable 24 h following allergen challenge, but peripheral blood eosinophil counts did not change. Concentrations of EPO in BAL fluid increased from 1 microg/L (1.0 to 6.8 microg/L) to 42 microg/L (5.6 to 379.6 microg/L; P < 0.01) after allergen but not after saline challenge (1.5 microg/L; 1.0 to 21.9 microg/L), whereas in control subjects all measurements were below the detection limit. Serum concentrations of EPO increased slightly from 18.3 microg/L (3.0 to 56.8 microg/L) to 27 microg/L (3.8 to 133.9 microg/L; P < 0.05) 24 h after allergen challenge in asthmatic patients. Furthermore, the intracellular expression of EPO (measured as mean fluorescence intensity) was decreased in BAL eosinophils compared with blood eosinophils (mean fluorescence intensity 29 (7 to 71) vs. 48 (20 to 85); P < 0.01) after allergen challenge. CONCLUSION: The finding of increased EPO concentrations in the BAL fluid and decreased intracellular EPO expression in pulmonary eosinophils of asthmatic patients reflects the allergen-triggered release of EPO into the bronchial space.     

Retrospective study on fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray efficacy in patients with allergic rhinitis: evaluation of clinical and laboratory parameters

BACKGROUND: In allergic rhinitis, allergenic stimulation causes the release of various mediators that induce symptoms and the development of chronic inflammation, which, in turn, is caused by cells involved in the late phase of inflammation, such as eosinophils. The eosinophils also cause damage at the mucosal level through the secretion of eosinophil cationic protein and other preformed factors contained in their granules. The objective was to verify the efficacy of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray in patients with allergic rhinitis; in a retrospective study, we have evaluated mediators of inflammation, making correlations with the clinical symptoms score during and outside the pollen season. METHODS: Forty patients with allergic rhinitis and 15 normal controls were included in our study. Eosinophil cationic protein, eosinophil chemotactic activity, and blood and nasal lavage eosinophil count were evaluated as laboratory parameters. RESULTS: We found a significant increase in nasal lavage levels of eosinophil cationic protein in allergic patients, and this was strictly correlated with the clinical symptoms score. No differences were found in the eosinophil count of allergic patients and in the serum eosinophil cationic protein of patients sensitized to seasonal allergens in comparison with normal subjects. By contrast, an increase in serum eosinophil cationic protein level was found in patients sensitized to perennial allergens. After topical administration of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray, a reduction in nasal lavage eosinophil cationic protein secretion was obtained with a reduction of eosinophil chemotactic activity at the local level. This reduction correlated with an improvement of clinical symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical improvement and reduction in nasal lavage eosinophil cationic protein and eosinophil chemotactic activity after administration of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray further confirms the role of this treatment in allergic rhinitis.     

T cell and eosinophil activation in mild and moderate atopic and nonatopic children's asthma in remission

BACKGROUND: Inflammation in the pathogenesis of asthma is associated with products of activated T cells and eosinophils. The aim of this study was to determine whether ongoing inflammation persists in children with different phenotypes of asthma despite the disease in remission. METHODS: Serum samples were collected from 68 children with atopic or nonatopic asthma in remission and from 15 healthy children. Soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R), IL-2 and IL-4 were examined by using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Total and specific immunoglobulin E, and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) were analysed by fluoroimmunoassay (Pharmacia CAP System). RESULTS: In patients with moderate persistent atopic asthma, sIL-2R was increased significantly when compared with mild persistent atopic asthma (P < 0.05). No changes of sIL-2R were seen in nonatopic asthmatics compared with atopics and controls. The level of IL-2 was elevated in moderate persistent atopic and nonatopic asthmatic children compared with controls (P < 0.05 and P < 0.05 respectively) and compared with mild persistent atopic asthmatics and mild persistent nonatopic asthmatics (P < 0.05 in both cases). The levels of IL-4 in most patients and controls remained below the sensitivity of the assay. Eosinophil cationic protein levels in moderate persistent atopic and nonatopic asthmatics were significantly higher than in mild persistent asthma severity cases (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01 respectively) and in healthy children (P < 0.01 in both cases). CONCLUSION: Changes in the concentration of sIL-2R, IL-2 and ECP reflect increased T cell and eosinophil activity in relation to the level of severity of asthma in atopic and nonatopic children, thereby proving the presence of persistent inflammation despite the absence of disease symptoms.     

Increased serum high mobility group box-1 level in Churg-Strauss syndrome

Churg-Strauss syndrome (CSS) is a rare form of systemic vasculitis occurring in patients with asthma and hypereosinophilia; however, its mechanisms involved in the severe tissue inflammation with vasculitis are poorly understood. High mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) protein, originally identified as a DNA binding protein, also has potent pro-inflammatory and proangiogenic properties. In this study, we hypothesized that HMGB1 might be associated with CSS, and examined serum HMGB1 levels and compared those of asthma patients and healthy volunteers. We also investigated HMGB1 expression in the lesion, and eosinophil HMGB1 amount in CSS patients. We found that the serum HMGB1 levels in CSS patients were significantly higher than those of asthma patients and healthy volunteers. Eosinophils in the CSS lesion expressed HMGB1 and HMGB1 level in eosinophils from CSS patients was significantly higher than that of asthma patients, while there was no significant difference in HMGB1 levels in peripheral mononuclear cells. The serum HMGB1 level in CSS patients decreased after the steroid therapy, and showed significant positive correlations with several molecules, including soluble interleukin-2 receptor, soluble thrombomodulin, and eosinophil cationic protein in sera. We propose that HMGB1 might contribute to the pathogenesis of CSS.     

Eotaxin in induced sputum of asthmatics: relationship with eosinophils and eosinophil cationic protein in sputum

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic inflammation is a crucial aspect of allergic diseases such as bronchial asthma. An eosinophil-active chemokine, eotaxin, may play a role in the pathogenesis of the tissue eosinophilia accompanying asthma. METHODS: Induced sputa were obtained from 53 patients with atopic asthma and six healthy subjects, and the concentration of eotaxin in the sputum was measured by ELISA. We investigated whether the sputum content of eotaxin is related to 1) asthma status or corticosteroid therapy, and 2) other sputum indices, including percentage of eosinophils and concentration of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP). RESULTS: The patients with stable or unstable asthma showed significantly higher concentrations of sputum eotaxin than the normal controls. The level of sputum eotaxin demonstrated a positive correlation with the percentage of eosinophils in stable asthmatics not receiving corticosteroid therapy, but not in stable patients treated with corticosteroids, or in unstable patients. Sputum eotaxin demonstrated a positive correlation with ECP in asthmatic patients who were either in a stable state or not receiving steroid therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The elevated level of eotaxin detected in association with increased eosinophils and ECP in the sputum of asthmatics suggests that eotaxin is involved in the pathogenesis of eosinophilic airway inflammation. The relationship of eotaxin to airway eosinophilia may be modified by the stability status of asthma and corticosteroid therapy.     

Serum eosinophil cationic protein in relation to bronchial asthma in a young Swedish population

How are the serum concentration of eosinophil cationic protein (S-ECP) and the blood eosinophil count (B-Eos) related to symptoms of asthma, allergy, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR)? We measured S-ECP, B-Eos, and total and specific IgE in serum in blood samples from 699 randomly selected persons 20–44 years old. They also underwent a structured interview, spirometry, a methacholine provocation test, and skin prick tests as part of the European Community Respiratory Health Survey. B-Eos and S-ECP were found to be closely related to asthma symptom score (P < 0.001), total IgE (P < 0.001), and BHR (P < 0.001). On the basis of the results, the subjects were divided into four groups: healthy controls, patients with allergic rhinitis, patients with nonallergic asthma, and patients with allergic asthma. There were significant differences in both B-Eos and S-ECP among the groups (P < 0.001), the highest values being found in the allergic asthma group. B-Eos and S-ECP each had an additive value in predicting the occurrence of asthma. Among persons with high concentrations of both variables, asthma was eight times more common than in those with low concentrations. Allergy and BHR were also found to be independently related to B-Eos and S-ECP levels. Furthermore, both B-Eos and S-ECP showed good correlation to subjective and objective measures of asthma activity. We conclude that both B-Eos and S-ECP and their interrelationship may be of value in assessing the activity of asthma. However, their role in disease management was not established in this cross-sectional study.     

Airway inflammation in asthma and perennial allergic rhinitis. Relationship with nonspecific bronchial responsiveness and maximal airway narrowing

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic airway inflammation is the hallmark of asthma, but it has also been reported in other conditions such as allergic rhinitis. We have tested whether the analysis of cells and chemicals in sputum can distinguish between patients with mild allergic asthma, those with allergic rhinitis, and healthy controls. The relationship between inflammation markers in sputum and nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine (BHR) (PD20 and maximal response plateau [MRP] values) was also evaluated. METHODS: We selected 31 mild asthmatics and 15 rhinitis patients sensitized to house-dust mite. As a control group, we studied 10 healthy subjects. Every subject underwent the methacholine bronchial provocation test (M-BPT) and sputum induction. Blood eosinophils and serum ECP levels were measured. Sputum cell differentials were assessed, and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), tryptase, albumin, and interleukin (IL)-5 levels were measured in the entire sputum supernatant. RESULTS: Blood eosinophils and serum ECP levels were higher in asthma patients and rhinitis than in healthy controls, but no difference between asthma patients and rhinitis patients was found. Asthmatics had higher eosinophil counts and higher ECP and tryptase levels in sputum than rhinitis patients or control subjects. Sputum albumin levels were higher in asthmatics than in controls. Rhinitis patients exhibited higher sputum eosinophils than healthy controls. An association between sputum eosinophil numbers and MPR values (r= -0.57) was detected, and a trend toward correlation between sputum ECP levels and PD20 values (r= -0.47) was found in the rhinitis group, but not in asthmatics. No correlation between blood eosinophilic inflammation and lung functional indices was found. CONCLUSIONS: Induced sputum is an accurate method to study bronchial inflammation, allowing one to distinguish between rhinitis patients and mildly asthmatic patients. The fact that no relationship was detected between sputum inflammation and BHR suggests that other factors, such as airway remodeling, may be at least partly responsible for BHR in asthma.     

Eosinophil apoptosis in asthma

Eosinophils play a major role in the onset and maintenance of bronchial inflammation and tissue injury in asthma. Like other leukocytes, eosinophils present in excessive numbers in inflamed tissues are removed by apoptosis. This phenomenon, also called 'programmed cell death', allows elimination of dangerous or redundant cells, thereby ensuring maintenance of tissue homeostasis. It has been suggested that a defect in eosinophil apoptosis would participate in the development and persistence of allergic airways inflammation in asthma. Eosinophil apoptosis, as well as the expression and function of various molecules determining this process, are closely regulated by various stimuli, including cytokines, lipid mediators and growth factors released by various cell types and by the eosinophil itself, as well as exogenous molecules, such as glucocorticoids. These stimuli have been shown to alter the expression and function of different molecules involved in the cascade of events characterising the apoptotic process, particularly Bcl-2 family proteins and the pro-apoptotic membrane glycoprotein, Fas. These observations, together with a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying eosinophil apoptosis, will help to more clearly define the molecular events involved in accumulation of these cells in blood and tissues and to identify potential new targets for the treatment of allergic diseases.     

Eosinophil markers in seasonal allergic rhinitis

Background The purpose was to study activation markers of the eosinophil granulocytes in seasonal allergic rhinitis, and the impact of topical steroid therapy thereupon.
Methods Sixty-three rhinitis patients with monoallergy to grass were examined before and at peak pollen season. Blood eosinophil count, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), and eosinophil peroxidase (EPO) in serum and nasal lavage fluid were measured. During the season, patients were randomized to treatment with intranasal fluticasone propionate 0.1 mg o.d. ( n =26), 0.2 mg o.d. ( n =25), or placebo (n = 12). Six healthy persons served as controls.
Results During the season, all parameters, except nasal lavage ECP, increased in the placebo group (P<0.001 – P<0.05). Significant differences were seen between the steroid grotips and the placebo group for all parameters (P<0.001–F<0.05). Higher eosinophil count (P<0.05), serum EPO (F<0.02), and nasal lavage EPO (P<0.05) were found in patients before season than in controls. The following winter, 44 patients returned for repeated measurement. Lower levels of nasal lavage EPO were observed for patients than levels at the beginning of the season (P<0.0001).
Conclusions Intranasal fluticasone propionate reduced inflammation of the nasal mucosa, demonstrated locally by nasal lavage ECP and EPO, and systemically by blood eosinophils, serum ECP, and serum EPO. EPO seemed more sensitive than ECP as indicator of allergic inflammation. EPO demonstrated some perennial eosinophil activity in hay fever patients, increasing locally during spring.     

Variations of Cationic Proteins from Eosinophil Leukocytes in Food Intolerance and Allergic Rhinitis

Challenge tests were performed in patients with food intolerance and allergic rhinitis to evaluate the usefulness of measurement of the eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) of serum to distinguish different allergic reactions. In one group of patients with food intolerance symptom-induced challenge resulted in a marked decrease of serum-ECP. The number of blood eosinophils decreased simultaneously in some but not all of these patients. In another group of patients with food intolerance serum-ECP displayed peak-like increases followed by a decrease. The decrease in serum-ECP may reflect that consumption of ECP is a result of idiosyncrasy in the target organ. In allergic rhinitis some patients showed an initial peak-like increase of serum-ECP, which was abolished by pretreatment with disodium-cromoglycate but not by pretreatment with antihistamine. Similar results have previously been demonstrated for allergic asthma. The difference obtained in serum-ECP upon challenge in typical reagin-mediated allergy and food intolerance may indicate that the latter is not reagin-mediated. However, the interpretation of data is difficult because of lack of knowledge regarding the turnover in the circulation of ECP.