带锁髓内钉治疗股骨干骨折合并股骨颈及转子间骨折或转子？…

目的 应用没髓内钉治疗股骨干骨折合并同侧股骨颈骨折及转子间骨折或转子下粉碎骨折。方法 在１９９６年７月￣１９９８年１１月收治的１６例复杂股骨骨折中,股骨干骨折合并同侧股骨颈骨折３例,合并转子间骨折４例,转子下粉碎骨折９例。其中１０例应用国产加长型Ｇａｍｍａ钉,６例使用Ｒｕｓｓｅｌｌ－Ｔａｙｌｏｒ股骨重建钉固定。结果 所有病例随访６￣２２个月,平均１１个月。除１例股骨干骨折合并同侧股骨颈骨折患术后     

股骨重建带锁髓内钉治疗股骨干合并同侧股骨颈骨折

目的:探讨应用股骨重建带锁髓内钉固定治疗股骨干合并同侧股骨颈骨折的效果.方法:总结我院2000年9月-2004年3月间收治的股骨干骨折合并同侧股骨颈骨折10例,均用股骨重建带锁髓内钉内固定.结果:所有病例随访8～36个月,平均18个月.骨折全部愈合,其中股骨干平均愈合时间为6.5个月,股骨颈骨折平均愈合时间为5.8个月.所有患者随诊时均未发现股骨头有缺血性坏死的表现,患肢关节功能优良,内固定钉无断裂.结论:应用股骨重建带锁髓内钉一套内固定装置同时固定同侧股骨干及股骨颈两处骨折部位,手术创伤小,固定牢固可靠,符合股骨的生物力学特点,有利于骨折愈合,可早期进行患肢功能锻炼,减少并发症发生,取得满意的疗效.     

股骨干合并同侧股骨颈或股骨转子间骨折

目的探讨股骨干合并同侧股骨颈或股骨转子间骨折的临床特点和漏诊原因.方法 8例股骨干骨折分别采用普通髓内钉、钢板、带锁髓内钉固定.其中合并股骨颈、股骨转子间骨折的6例选用DHS、带锁髓内钉、空心螺钉固定;术前漏诊2例采用非手术治疗.结果 8例全部获随访,随访时间5个月～2年.股骨干及股骨颈、股骨转子间骨折均获骨性愈合,伤肢功能恢复满意.结论对高能量损伤造成股骨干骨折应常规摄骨盆前后位X线片及膝部X线片.一旦发现合并股骨颈或股骨转子间骨折,应争取早期手术内固定,效果满意.     

重建带锁髓内钉治疗同侧股骨干合并股骨颈骨折

目的评价股骨重建带锁髓内钉治疗同侧股骨干合并股骨颈骨折的临床疗效。方法对2006年10月至2009年10月有完整临床资料的11例采用重建带锁髓内钉治疗同侧股骨干合并股骨颈骨折患者进行回顾性分析。其中男9例,女2例;年龄19～65岁,平均38岁。结果 11例患者平均随访18个月,全部股骨干和股骨颈骨折均获得骨性愈合,股骨干骨折平均愈合时间6.4个月,股骨颈骨折平均愈合时间5.8个月,术后未出现股骨头缺血性坏死。无髓内针及锁钉断裂、松动或感染等并发症,采用Sanders髋关节创伤后功能评分,10例优秀,1例良好。结论采用股骨重建髓内钉治疗同侧股骨干合并股骨颈骨折,效果可靠,并发症少,疗效满意。     

股骨重建钉治疗股骨干合并同侧股骨颈、股骨转子间骨折

目的探讨应用股骨重建钉内固定治疗股骨干合并同侧股骨颈、股骨转子间骨折的临床疗效.方法 10例使用股骨重建钉内固定治疗,对采用闭合穿钉或小切口复位穿钉手术的疗效进行回顾性分析.结果患者均获得随访,时间6～24个月.股骨颈、股骨转子间骨折平均愈合时间为5.1个月,股骨干骨折平均愈合时间为7个月,髋膝关节活动良好,无股骨头坏死征象.结论股骨重建钉是目前治疗股骨干合并同侧股骨颈、股骨转子间骨折有效的方法.     

同侧股骨干合并股骨颈骨折的处理

目的 分析同侧股骨干合并股骨颈骨折的临床特点和诊断要点，探讨不同治疗方法的疗效。方法 1998年3月－2001年6月收治的18例19个同侧股骨干合并股骨颈骨折病人中，早期诊断12例，2例用多针固定。2例行缝匠肌带肌蒂植骨，3例行带旋髂深血管植骨术。结果 术后随访8－40个月，平均16个月。股骨干骨折除1例钢板固定不愈合外其余均愈合。股骨颈骨折1例不愈合，其余均愈合。结论 对股骨干骨折合并同侧股骨颈骨折早期推荐使用逆行带锁髓内钉和空心螺钉固定，对漏诊病例使用多针在股骨髓内钉前方固定股骨颈是一种有效的补救方法，晚期漏诊采用带肌蒂、血管蒂植骨术仍可取得较高愈合率。     

加长型伽玛带锁髓内钉治疗股骨干合并同侧股骨颈或粗隆间骨折

目的应用加长型伽玛带锁髓内钉治疗股骨干合并同侧股骨颈或粗隆间骨折。方法2000年8月至2005年2月,采用国产加长型伽玛带锁髓内钉治疗14例股骨干合并同侧股骨颈或粗隆间骨折,受伤至手术时间平均为13(6~18)d。全部采用有限扩髓闭合复位穿钉。结果11例患者术后获平均22(16~28)个月随访,骨折全部愈合,完全负重时间为20周,愈合时间平均为10(5~21)个月。根据Sanders功能评分标准评定疗效:优6例,良4例,差1例。1例患肢轻度外旋,1例肢体缩短1.2 cm,髋膝关节恢复满意,无髋内翻、切口感染及断钉等并发症。经此方法治疗可早期活动关节及功能锻炼,手术创伤小,失血少,固定可靠,并发症少,骨折愈合率高。结论对股骨干合并同侧股骨颈或粗隆间骨折的治疗,加长型伽玛带锁髓内钉有明显优势。     

同侧股骨干合并股骨颈骨折的手术治疗

目的探讨同侧股骨干合并股骨颈骨折的临床特点及治疗方法。方法选择2000年2月至2006年4月,14例经手术复位内固定治疗的同侧股骨干合并股骨颈骨折患者进行回顾性分析,其中股骨颈骨折漏诊4例,采用股骨重建髓内钉固定4例,股骨逆行交锁髓内钉及空心螺钉固定5例,股骨交锁髓内钉结合空心螺钉固定2例,股骨干骨折加压钢板及空心钉固定3例。结果本组14例均获随防,随访时间为12~48个月,平均27个月。14例股骨干骨折均在术后7个月内获得愈合,股骨颈骨折在6个月内愈合。无切口感染、血管神经损伤、内固定断裂及股骨头缺血性坏死等并发症发生。所有患者髋关节功能的恢复无活动障碍,膝关节活动受限1例。结论同侧股骨干合并股骨颈骨折时股骨颈骨折常常无移位或轻度移位,其漏诊率高,在骨折治疗的微创理念指导下,运用医生熟练掌握的内固定方法,经过合理的术后功能锻炼,可获得满意的临床疗效。     

股骨重建髓内钉内固定治疗股骨干多节段骨折合并髋部骨折

目的探讨小切口复位股骨重建髓内钉内固定治疗股骨干多节段骨折合并同侧髋部骨折的疗效。方法对54例股骨干多节段骨折合并同侧髋部骨折行小切口复位骨折段及粉碎的股骨干,然后采用股骨重建髓内钉内固定。股骨干骨折合并股骨颈骨折37例,股骨干骨折合并股骨粗隆间骨折17例。结果54例均获得3～6个月的随访,平均4个月。骨折均一期愈合,发生髋内翻1例,股骨头切割2例。末次随访时髋关节功能Harris评分平均（92．22±2．17）分。结论小切口复位股骨干骨折同时采用股骨重建髓内钉内固定治疗股骨干骨折合并同侧股骨颈或股骨粗隆间骨折,具有手术时间短、出血少且固定牢靠等优点,是预防髋内翻发生和促进骨折愈合的有效术式。     

两种方法治疗股骨干合并同侧股骨颈骨折的比较研究

目的比较股骨重建带锁髓内钉和股骨颈三枚空心螺钉＋有限接触加压钢板治疗同侧股骨干并股骨颈骨折的临床疗效。方法对18例股骨干合并同侧股骨颈骨折病例进行回顾性分析,其中股骨颈三枚空心螺钉＋有限接触加压钢板治疗7例（A组）,股骨重建带锁髓内钉治疗11例（B组）。结果与B组相比,A组手术时间较长,术中及术后失血量较多,股骨干骨折平均愈合时间长（P〈0.05）,而两组股骨颈骨折平均愈合时间及术后Sanders髋关节评分无显著性差异（P〉0.05）。结论两种方法治疗股骨干合并同侧股骨颈骨折均可取得满意疗效,股骨重建带锁髓内钉治疗股骨干合并同侧股骨颈骨折在缩短手术时间及减少出血量方面优势明显。     

股骨重建钉治疗同侧股骨干股骨颈骨折

目的探讨应用股骨重建钉治疗同侧股骨干、股骨颈骨折的临床疗效。方法对17例同侧股骨干股骨颈骨折患者采用股骨重建钉治疗。结果术后随访12—36个月,17例股骨干骨折临床愈合时间为4—13个月,平均7个月;16例股骨颈骨折临床愈合时间为3—6个月,平均4．5个月。结论应用股骨重建钉治疗同侧股骨干、股骨颈骨折可获得良好的临床疗效,具有一定的应用价值。     

股骨干顺行髓内钉固定后同侧股骨颈骨折的治疗

目的：探讨股骨干骨折行顺行髓内钉固定后发现同侧股骨颈骨折的治疗方法。方法：回顾性分析2000年1月至2010年1月股骨干骨折行顺行髓内钉固定后术中或术后发现同侧股骨颈骨折的患者12例,全部以2枚螺钉分别自髓内钉前后方固定股骨颈骨折,定期随访,评估骨折愈合及功能恢复情况。结果：术后随访10—36个月,平均16．5个月。股骨颈骨折平均愈合时间3．6个月,股骨干骨折平均愈合时间5．4个月,无股骨头坏死发生。按Harris评分标准髋关节功能：优7例,良3例,可2例。结论：股骨干骨折顺行髓内钉固定后发现同侧股骨颈骨折,以2枚螺钉分别自髓内钉前后方固定股骨颈骨折方法可行,固定可靠,手术创伤小,骨折愈合率高。     

股骨干骨折合并同侧隐性股骨颈骨折的诊治分析

目的探讨对股骨干骨折合并同侧隐性股骨颈骨折的诊治方法。方法1998年3月至2003年10月我院共收治股骨干合并同侧隐性股骨颈骨折9例。回顾性分析这9例患者的临床资料。9例患者术前CT诊断隐性股骨颈骨折3例,术中诊断5例,术后CT发现合并股骨颈骨折1例。其中5例采用股骨重建髓内针同时固定股骨干和股骨颈骨折;3例患者股骨干采用逆行髓内针固定而股骨颈采用空心钉固定;另1例在顺行完成股骨干固定后用2枚空心钉固定股骨颈。结果所有患者均获得随访,随访时间6～36个月,平均20个月。全部股骨干骨折均在术后6个月内愈合,股骨颈骨折在3个月内愈合。结论股骨干骨折合并同侧隐性股骨颈骨折早期漏诊率高,临床医生通过对患者的受伤机制分析,对高能量损伤患者应考虑隐性股骨颈骨折的可能,术前可用CT获得诊断,行股骨干骨折带锁髓内针时术中和术后密切注意股骨颈骨折是否存在,从而减少股骨颈骨折的漏诊率。采用髓内针固定可获得满意疗效。     

Treatment of ipsilateral hip and femoral shaft fractures with reconstructive intramedullary interlocking nail

Objective: To evaluate the results of reconstructive intramedullary interlocking nail in the treatment of ipsllateral hip and femoral shaft fractures. Methods: From August 1997 to November 2001, 13 patients were treated with the reconstructive intramedullary interlocking nail. Nine patients were associated with ipsllateral femoral neck fractures, three with ipsilateral intertrochanteric fractures, and one with subtrochanteric fracture. Results: The follow-up time was from 6 to 38 months with an average of 14 months. All the femoral shaft and hip fractures healed up well. There was no nonunion of the femoral neck, and only one varns malunion. No patient had avascular necrosis of the femoral head. The average healing time for femoral neck fracture was 4.6 months and for shaft fracture 5.8 months. The joint movement and other functions were fairly resumed. Conclusions: The reconstructive intramedullary interlocking nail, with less trauma, refiable fixation, and high rate of fracture healing, is an ideal method of choice in the treatment of ipsilateral hip and femoral shaft fractures.     

Cephalomedullary interlocked nail for ipsilateral hip and femoral shaft fractures

A retrospective study of the management of 23 cases of ipsilateral hip and femoral shaft fractures, between January 1998 and December 2001, is presented. All except two cases were managed by a single implant, i.e. reconstruction nail. There was delayed diagnosis of femoral neck fracture in two cases where the "miss a nail" technique was used for fixation of the femoral neck fracture. All patients managed by reconstruction nail were simultaneously operated on for both fractures and operative treatment was executed as early as the general condition of the patient permitted. Delay in treatment was generally because of the associated injuries (head, chest or abdominal). There were 22 males and 1 female patient with an average age of 34.5 years. Average follow-up was 30.9 months. There was one case of non-union of the femoral neck fracture, one case of avascular necrosis and one femoral neck fracture united in varus. There were four cases of non-union and six cases of delayed union of femoral shaft fractures. Mean time for union of the femoral neck fracture was 15 weeks and for the shaft fracture was 22 weeks. In this series femoral shaft fracture determined the total union period. Complications involving the femoral shaft fracture were more common than those related to femoral neck fractures. Shaft complications were more manageable with or without secondary procedures as compared to femoral neck complications, which usually require more extensive procedures. This stresses the need to realise the significance and seriousness of both components of this complex injury, in evaluation, management and post-operative care. We conclude that, though technically demanding, reconstruction nail is an acceptable alternative for management of concomitant fractures of the femoral neck and shaft with acceptable rates of complications and good results.     

Treatment of ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures

Objective：To investigate the clinical characteristics, treatment options and causes of misdiagnosis of ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures.
Methods： Among 20 patients with ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures, 19 were treated operatively and 1 was treated conservatively. Sixteen cases of femoral shaft fractures were treated by open reduction and internal fixation with compressive plate, and 2 cases were treated with interlocking intramedullary nailing. Eighteen femoral neck fractures were treated with cannulated screws. Another patient was treated with proximal femoral nail to fix both the neck and shaft. Delayed diagnosis for femoral neck frac-tures occurred in 2 cases preoperatively. Results： A total of 19 patients were followed up. The follow up period ranged from 5 to 48 months with an average of 15 months. All the fractures were healed.
Conclusion： For case of femoral shaft fracture caused by high energy injury, an AP pelvic film should be routinely taken. Once the femoral neck fracture is recognized, operative reduction and fixation should be performed in time. Femoral neck and shaft fractures should be fixed separately.     

股骨重建钉治疗复杂性股骨骨折

目的:探讨股骨重建钉治疗股骨复杂性骨折的临床疗效。方法:复杂性股骨骨折患者28例,男20例,女8例;年龄31~79岁,平均46岁。闭合性骨折24例,开放性骨折4例。采用Austofix股骨重建钉固定,股骨颈保持15°前倾角置入拉力螺钉,用三维瞄准器锁定远折端。结果:28例均获随访,随访时间5~27个月,平均11·7个月。按马元璋评定标准,优14例,良10例,可4例,未发生股骨头坏死等并发症。结论:股骨重建钉是目前治疗复杂性股骨骨折的有效方法。     

股骨干骨折合并同侧股骨颈骨折治疗的临床观察

目的：探讨股骨干合并同侧股骨颈骨折的治疗特点和不同固定方法的疗效。方法：股骨干骨折合并同侧股骨颈骨折27例,男22例,女5例;年龄14～65岁,平均35岁。动力髋螺钉（DHS）固定3例,加压钢板加空心加压螺钉固定12例,重建钉固定8例,顺行髓内钉加空心加压螺钉固定4例。13例固定术前用克氏针临时固定股骨颈骨折。结果：术后随访36～75个月,平均44个月。25例股骨颈骨折平均愈合时间4.5个月,2例股骨颈骨折不愈合。27例股骨干均愈合,平均愈合时间6个月。未用克氏针临时固定股骨颈骨折14例中,2例出现股骨颈不愈合,3例轻度髋内翻畸形。结论：股骨干合并同侧股骨颈骨折有许多固定方法可供选择,加压钢板加空心加压螺钉固定简便易用,在实施固定术前用克氏针临时固定股骨颈骨折可避免股骨颈骨折再移位和损伤。