Role of laparoscopic ultrasonography in intraoperative localization of pancreatic insulinoma

Background: A combination of digital palpation and ultrasonography plays an important role in locating insulinomas intraoperatively. Laparoscopic resection of insulinomas has been described recently, but experience in locating insulinomas during laparoscopy is lacking. Methods: From January 1998 to January 1999, three patients with pancreatic insulinomas underwent laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasonography aimed at intraoperative localization and potential resection. The role of laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasonography in locating insulinomas is evaluated. Results: Preoperative localization studies were routinely performed, and two patients had an occult tumor before laparoscopy. None of the tumors was detected by laparoscopic examination, but laparoscopic ultrasonography identified solitary tumors located at the body and tail of the pancreas. Conversion to laparotomy was performed in one patient as a planned procedure. One patient underwent laparoscopic enucleation, whereas the other had a laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Conclusions: Laparoscopic ultrasonography seems to be sensitive in locating insulinomas at the body and tail of the pancreas. It optimizes and facilitates resection of insulinomas through a minimally invasive approach. Received: 8 March 1999/Accepted: 10 August 1999/Online publication: 7 September 2000     

Laparoscopic ultrasonography for resection of insulinomas.

BACKGROUND: There have been few reports on the use of laparoscopic ultrasonography as an aid for the resection of insulinomas. In this study, we review our experience with laparoscopic ultrasonography for the intraoperative localization and resection of insulinomas. METHODS: We attempted laparoscopic resection of insulinomas in 7 patients (median age, 50 years) during a 4-year period. Preoperative imaging showed that 1 of the insulinomas was located in the head of the pancreas, 2 were located in the body, and 4 were located in the tail. RESULTS: We identified the insulinomas in all 7 patients with laparoscopic ultrasonography. In 6 of the patients, the insulinomas were laparoscopically resectable, either by enucleation (4 patients) or by resection of the pancreatic tail (2 patients). Conversion to laparotomy was necessary for the insulinomas in the head of the pancreas because they were close to the portal vein and the major pancreatic duct. All patients showed improvement in their hypoglycemia after the operations. Minor leakage of pancreatic juice occurred in 4 patients, and this was resolved with conservative treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic ultrasonography is useful for the intraoperative localization of insulinomas. Laparoscopy is a safe and feasible technique for resecting insulinomas located in the body or tail of the pancreas.     

Exérèse vidéolaparoscopique des insulinomes. Étude de cinq observations *

Study aimEvaluation of the feasibility of the videolaparoscopic resection in pancreatic insulinomas, and reporting of five cases.Patients and methodFrom 1996 to 1998, a videolaparoscopic resection was attempted in five patients with sporadic, unique and benign insulinoma. The insulinoma was recognised and localised by preoperative ultrasonography in the pancreatic head (n = 1), body (n = 3) or tail (n = 1). For the videolaparoscopic procedure, three to five trocars were necessary. Cephalic and corporeal insulinomas were approached through an opening of the gastrocolic ligament and caudal insulinoma required mobilisation of the splenic flexure of the colon and dissection of the splenic pedicle. Peroperative ultrasonography was not used.ResultsFour resections were exclusively performed with videolaparoscopy: three enuclations and one distal pancreatectomy with splenic preservation. The cephalic insulinoma could not be found by laparoscopic exploration and required a laparotomy to be recognised and enucleated; it was located further down than expected. There were no postoperative complications in four patients. One enucleation was complicated by a pancreatic fistula that required reoperation. All the patients were cured with a 6- to 16-month follow-up.ConclusionSelected insulinomas may be operated on with videolaparoscopy. Preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography is necessary for this selection. Videolaparoscopic approach is contraindicated in multiple insulinomas, in insulinomas located on the posterior wall or deeply located in the head of the pancreas, and in malignant tumors. Videolaparoscopic resection is mainly indicated in unique and benign insulinomas, superficially located on the anterior wall of the pancreas, to be resected by enucleation or distal pancreatectomy. Disadvantage of laparoscopic approach compared to conventional approach is the absence of palpation and difficulty to explore the whole pancreas; advantage is the lack of parietal incision and the good postoperative comfort.     

胰岛素瘤腹腔镜外科治疗体会

目的 评估腹腔镜胰岛素瘤切除术的可行性和安全性。方法 2002年6月至2004年6月25例胰岛素瘤患者,分别行腹腔镜胰岛素瘤切除术（腹腔镜组,10例）和开腹胰岛素瘤切除术（开腹手术组,15例）,比较2组手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院天数和并发症发生率差异是否有统计学意义。结果 肿瘤发生部位、大小差异无统计学意义,手术时间、术中出血量和术后平均住院天数等差异均无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。并发症发生率方面,腹腔镜手术组仅1例并发胰瘘,开腹手术组3例并发胰瘘、2例并发腹腔感染、5例并发胸腔积液,开腹手术组并发症发生率显著高于腹腔镜手术组（P〈0．01）。结论 位于胰体或尾部的胰岛素瘤行腹腔镜下胰岛素瘤切除术是安全可行的,并且并发症发生率低于经典的开腹手术。     

Videolaparoscopic Resection of Insulinomas: Experience in Two Institutions

Laparoscopic resection of islet cell tumors has been performed in some selected cases. The aim of the study was to analyze the experience of two institutions in the laparoscopic management of insulinomas. In a 4-year period, videolaparoscopic resection of sporadic insulinomas was performed in 9 patients. All patients had hypoglycemia/hyperinsulinism and a solitary tumor demonstrated by image studies. Demographics, surgical findings, results, and complications were analyzed. Mean age of the patients was 43 years. One patient was male and eight were females. One tumor was located in the head of the pancreas, 4 in the body, and 4 in the tail. Laparoscopic resection was completed in all patients. Procedures included 4 enucleations and 5 distal pancreatectomies. Pancreatic resection with splenic preservation was achieved in 4 cases. Intraoperative ultrasound was used in 7 patients. Mean size of the tumors was 1.6 cm. All patients became normoglycemic after surgery. Complications included one pancreatic fistula, one pleural effusion, and one peripancreatic fluid collection. All resolved spontaneously. In a follow-up period between 3 and 48 months no evidence of recurrence has been observed. This series supports laparoscopic resection of preoperatively localized benign solitary insulinomas. The operation provides the advantages of minimally invasive surgery and can be safely performed in most cases.     

Laparoscopic enucleation of a nonfunctioning neuroendocrine tumor at the head of the pancreas.

OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopy is a safe, feasible technique for benign pancreatic pathologies and has been increasingly reported for neuroendocrine tumors located at the body and tail of the pancreas. We report a case of successful enucleation of a nonfunctioning neuroendocrine tumor located at the head of the pancreas, in a patient with multiple endocrine neoplasia type I. METHODS: A 5-cm nonfunctioning neuroendocrine tumor at the pancreatic head was identified by computerized tomography scan. Laparoscopic ultrasound did not reveal additional tumors on any other part of the pancreas. RESULTS: Enucleation was successfully performed for this solitary tumor because of its favorable position. Histology revealed an islet cell tumor. No postoperative complications occurred and recovery was rapid. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic enucleation of neuroendocrine tumor at the pancreatic head is safe and feasible for select patients.     

Pancreatic Insulinoma: A Surgical Experience

Background  Small size, high benignity rate, and sporadic nature make insulinomas suitable for laparoscopic resection. On the other hand, occult location or multicentricity mandate open surgery. This study was designed to analyze a series of patients who had pancreatic insulinomas and underwent initial treatment at our institution. Methods  Clinical records of the 34 patients with pancreatic insulinomas who underwent surgical resection between 1995 and 2007 were reviewed. Main variables for analysis were cure of the disease and surgical complications. Results  There were 20 women and 14 men with a mean age of 40 ± 13 years. Mean size of the tumors was 2.2 ± 1 cm. Laparoscopic resection was completed in 14 of 21 patients. Most tumors that were resected by laparoscopy were solitary, benign, and located in the body and tail of the pancreas. Open surgery was selected for 13 patients, including 7 sporadic (5 in the head), 4 related to the MEN syndrome, and 2 malignant tumors. Surgical morbidity occurred in 23 patients. The most common complication was pancreatic fistula (3/13 in open, 4/14 in laparoscopic, and 6/7 in conversions). One patient in the open group died 15 days after surgery from massive PTE. Postoperative normoglycemia was achieved in all patients and persisted for a follow-up period of 4 ± 3.7 years. Conclusions  Most insulinomas in our series were small and benign. Tumors that were located in the body and tail were more often amenable for laparoscopic resection. The cure rate was very high. Pancreatic fistula was the most frequent complication.     

Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: its indications and techniques: from the viewpoint of limiting the indications

Indications in the field of pancreatic surgery should be limited considering the technical difficulties and the characteristics of pancreatic diseases. Benign or low-grade malignant tumors, including pseudocysts, islet tumors, and cystic tumors, are indications for distal pancreatectomy. Islet tumors such as insulinomas are good candidates for this procedure when they are located near splenic vessels or the main pancreatic duct and enucleation is considered inappropriate. Techniques of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with/without splenectomy and laparoscopy-assisted distal pancreatectomy indicated in low-grade malignant tumors such as mucinous cystadenoma are described. Insulinoma is one of the best candidates for enucleation because many of the cases are solitary and benign. The technique of enucleation is also described. Received: April 20, 2002 / Accepted: May 13, 2002 Offprint requests to: N. Kano This paper was read at Symposium-2: Laparoscopic Pancreatic Surgery — Its Indications and Techniques, at The 5th World Congress of the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, held in Tokyo in April 2002.     

Laparoscopic resection of the pancreas and review of the literature

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery still is not a common procedure worldwide. Postoperative complications such as a pancreatic leakage cause a serious condition. We report our consecutive laparoscopic pancreatic resections of islet cell tumors or benign diseases and their outcomes. METHOD: Laparoscopic pancreatic resections were attempted in three patients. Preoperative diagnoses were insulinoma in two patients and cystadenoma in one patient. The lesions were located in the pancreas body in two patients and the pancreas tail in one patient. Their sizes ranged from 1 to 6 cm in diameter (mean, 3 cm). RESULTS: We performed distal pancreatectomy using an endoscopic linear stapler with conservation of the spleen in two patients and enucleation in one patient. Of the distal pancreatectomies, the splenic artery and vein were preserved in one patient, whereas in the other they were divided. There were no perioperative complications in any of the cases. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 10 days (range, 7-14 days). There were no episodes of hypoglycemia or recurrence during the mean follow-up period of 25 months (range, 11-36 months). CONCLUSIONS: Although laparoscopic pancreatic resection of selected patients is a feasible and safe procedure in the hands of experienced laparoscopic surgeons, patients must be carefully observed after surgery to avoid serious conditions by pancreatic fistula.     

Laparoscopic versus open approach for solitary insulinoma

Background In recent years, advances in laparoscopic techniques have allowed surgeons to treat pancreatic lesions laparoscopically. Insulinoma, the most prevalent pancreatic endocrine tumor, is mostly benign and curable with surgical resection. This study aimed to assess the results from laparoscopic resection (LG) of insulinomas and to compare them with the results from open surgery (OG). Methods From September 1999 to December 2005, 56 laparoscopic pancreatic resections were performed for selected patients, including 12 laparoscopic resections of insulinomas. The results were compared with those of patients who underwent open resection of insulinomas selected from the authors’ pancreatic database. Results Three conversions to the open approach were required because of inability to identify the tumor. There were no deaths in either group, and the morbidity rates were 25% (3/12) for LG and 55% (5/9) for OG (nonsignificant difference). The pancreatic fistula rate after laparoscopic enucleation was statistically lower than after open enucleation (14% vs 100%; p = 0.015). The mean postoperative hospital stay was 13 ± 5.9 days for LG and 17.6 ± 7.5 days for OG (nonsignificant difference). After exclusion of the patients who underwent conversion to laparotomy, the mean postoperative hospital stay was 11.5 ± 5.8 days for LG and 17.6 ± 7.5 days for OG (p = 0.04). Conclusion This study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic resection of insulinomas. The laparoscopic approach was associated with a decrease in hospital stay and pancreatic fistula after enucleation. Preoperative localization tests and laparoscopic ultrasonography seem necessary to prevent conversion.     

Laparoscopic pancreatectomy: a series of 22 patients

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery underwent many changes in the last few years. Current indications include staging laparoscopy for pancreatic neoplasms, palliative treatment of non-resectable tumors, and pseudocysts drainage. Pancreatic tail resection or pancreatic enucleation have also been reported, but are currently under investigation. We report our experience in this domain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study of patients who had a pancreatic tail resection or pancreatic enucleation, in a single institution. RESULTS: From November 1993 to June 2002, a laparoscopic pancreatic resection was attempted in 22 patients. Nineteen patients were operated by laparoscopy (86%), two patients had conversion to laparotomy (9%), and one had conversion to a "hand-assisted" technique (4%). There was 17 left pancreatectomies and five enucleations. Median operating time was 4.1 hours (range 1.6 to 6.6 hours). There were no deaths in the first 30 post-operative days. Global morbidity rate was 31.8% (N =7), including four pancreatic fistulas (18%), one superficial phlebitis, one prolonged ileus, and one peri-pancreatic fluid collection. Median hospital stay was six days (1 to 26 days). CONCLUSION. - Pancreatic tail resections and enucleations are feasible by laparoscopy, with a mortality and morbidity rate similar to open surgery. The potential advantages of laparoscopy (reduced post-operative pain, hospital stay and recovery time) should be balanced with a potential increase in pancreatic fistula rate. That risk should be addressed before laparoscopy is generalized for pancreatic resections.     

Pancréatectomies sous laparoscopie : une série de 22 patients

Introduction. - Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery underwent many changes in the last few years. Current indications include staging laparoscopy for pancreatic neoplasms, palliative treatment of non-resectable tumors, and pseudocysts drainage. Pancreatic tail resection or pancreatic enucleation have also been reported, but are currently under investigation. We report our experience in this domain.Material and methods. - Retrospective study of patients who had a pancreatic tail resection or pancreatic enucleation, in a single institution.Results. - From November 1993 to June 2002, a laparoscopic pancreatic resection was attempted in 22 patients. Nineteen patients were operated by laparoscopy (86%), two patients had conversion to laparotomy (9%), and one had conversion to a “hand-assisted” technique (4%). There was 17 left pancreatectomies and five enucleations. Median operating time was 4.1 hours (range 1.6 to 6.6 hours). There were no deaths in the first 30 post-operative days. Global morbidity rate was 31.8% (N =7), including four pancreatic fistulas (18%), one superficial phlebitis, one prolonged ileus, and one peri-pancreatic fluid collection. Median hospital stay was six days (1 to 26 days).Conclusion. - Pancreatic tail resections and enucleations are feasible by laparoscopy, with a mortality and morbidity rate similar to open surgery. The potential advantages of laparoscopy (reduced post-operative pain, hospital stay and recovery time) should be balanced with a potential increase in pancreatic fistula rate. That risk should be addressed before laparoscopy is generalized for pancreatic resections.     

Chirurgische Therapie benigner,prämaligner und niedrig maligner Tumoren des Pankreas

Cystic neoplasms and neuroendocrine adenomas of the pancreas are detected increasingly more frequently and in up to 50?% as asymptomatic tumors. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, mucinous cystic neoplasms and solid pseudopapillary neoplasms are considered to be premalignant lesions with different rates of malignant transformation. The most frequent neuroendocrine adenomas are insulinomas. Neuroendocrine adenomas are considered to be potentially malignant, inherent to the lesion and development is unpredictable. Standard surgical treatment for pancreatic tumors are the Kausch-Whipple resection, left hemipancreatectomy and total pancreatectomy depending on the location; however, the application of standard surgical procedures, which are usually multiorgan resections for benign, premalignant and low-risk cancers of the pancreas have to be balanced against the risk for early postoperative morbidity, hospital mortality of 1.5–7?% and loss of endocrine and exocrine pancreatic functions in 12–30?%. Tumor enucleation, pancreatic middle segment resection and duodenum-preserving total pancreatic head (DPPHR-T/S) resection are parenchyma-preserving, local resection procedures, which are associated with a low early postoperative rate of severe complications, hospital mortality up to 1.3?% and maintenance of exocrine and endocrine pancreatic functions in more than 90?%. Tumor enucleation bears the risk of pancreatic fistulas (<33?%) and a limitation is proximity to the pancreatic main duct. The main risk for pancreatic middle segment resection is early postoperative pancreatic fistulas (up to 40?%), early postoperative intra-abdominal hemorrhage and a reintervention frequency up to 15?%. The DPPHR-T/S resection is applied for cystic neoplastic lesions in 90?%, severe postoperative complications are below 15?% and the 90-day hospital mortality is 0.5?%. Pancreatic fistulas are observed in less than 20?% with a recurrence rate of <1?%. These facts and maintenance of exocrine and endocrine pancreatic functions are advantages compared with the Kausch-Whipple resection of the pancreatic head. The use of tumor enucleation, particularly for neuroendocrine tumors and pancreatic middle segment resection as well as total DPPHR resection should replace the pancreatoduodenectomy for lesions in the pancreatic head and hemipancreatectomy for lesions in the pancreatic body and tail.     

Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: Current indications and surgical results

Background: Although minimally invasive surgery has achieved worldwide acceptance in various fields, laparoscopic surgery for pancreatic diseases has been reported only rarely. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes and feasibility of laparoscopic pancreatic surgery. Methods: Fifteen patients, comprising eight men and seven women with an average age of 54 years, underwent laparoscopic pancreatic surgery. Distal pancreatectomy was indicated for solid tumors (n = 4), cystic lesions (n = 3), and chronic pancreatitis (n = 2). Cystogastrostomy was performed for pseudocysts (n = 4) and enucleation for insulinomas (n = 2). The lesions varied in size from 1 to 9 cm (2.9 ± 2.4 cm) and were located in the pancreatic head (n = 2), body (n = 3), or tail (n = 10). For distal pancreatectomy, the splenic artery was divided and the parenchyma was transected with a linear stapler. Laparoscopic ultrasonography was used to determine the distance between the tumor and the main pancreatic duct for enucleation as well as to localize the lesion for distal pancreatectomy. Cystogastrostomy, 4.5 cm in length, was also performed with the linear stapler through the window of the lesser omentum. Results: Mean operation time was 249 ± 70 min (293 ± 58 min in distal pancreatectomy, 185 ± 14 min in enucleation, 204 ± 50 min in cystogastrostomy), and mean blood loss was 138 ± 184 g (213 ± 227 g, 75 ± 35 g, 38 ± 48 g, respectively). Two distal pancreatectomies (13%) were converted to open surgery due to severe peripancreatic inflammation. There was no related mortality, but there were two cases (15%) of pancreatic fistula, one in a distal pancreatectomy case and the other in an enucleation case, and both were treated conservatively. Conclusions: Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery is safe and feasible for patients with benign tumors and cystic lesions.     

Laparoscopic detection and resection of insulinomas

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic ultrasonography as a diagnostic tool for the localization of islet cell tumors has been described before, but few reports on laparoscopic resection of insulinomas exist. We retrospectively reviewed the results of our experience with laparoscopic detection and the resection of insulinomas to determine its feasibility. METHODS: Between February 1996 and February 1999, 10 patients underwent operation for organic hyperinsulinism at our institution. Patient and clinical characteristics were studied retrospectively. Laparoscopic ultrasonography was performed to localize the insulinoma and then laparoscopic resection was performed. RESULTS: Eight women and 2 men underwent operation for hyperinsulinism. In 6 patients the insulinoma could be resected laparoscopically, either by enucleation (5 patients) or by resection of the pancreatic tail (1 patient). Four procedures were converted to laparotomy for the proximate location of the insulinoma to the portal vein or pancreatic duct (3 procedures) and failure to identify the insulinoma (1 procedure). The overall success rate of preoperative localization of an insulinoma with the use of various imaging techniques was 60% (6/10 patients). Laparoscopic ultrasonography could identify an insulinoma in 90% of the patients (9/10 patients). The median hospital stay was 7 days. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic ultrasonography followed by laparoscopic removal of the insulinoma in patients with clinically manifested hyperinsulinism is a feasible and safe technique with low morbidity and fast postoperative recovery. Preoperative localization studies appear of limited value.     

Outcome of laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: endocrine and nonendocrine tumors

Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery (LapPS) for management of benign pancreatic tumors has still not been defined. This paper evaluates the feasibility and outcome of LapPS in patients with endocrine pancreatic tumors (EPTs) and cystic neoplasms of the pancreas (CyNP). Eighteen patients with benign pancreatic tumors underwent LapPS between January 1998 and May 2001. The indications were 10 EPTs (6 sporadic insulinomas, 1 multiple insulinoma of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, 2 nonfunctioning tumors, 1 VIPoma) and 8 CyNPs (3 serous cystadenomas, 5 mucinous cystic neoplasms). The laparoscopic procedure was performed using four ports with patients in the half-lateral position. Laparoscopic ultrasonography (LapUS) was used in all cases. Laparoscopic enucleation (LapE) was planned in five patients and performed in four (one conversion for tumor not found during laparoscopy). Laparoscopic pancreatic resection (LapPR) with spleen salvage was planned in 13 patients and performed in 12 (one conversion for metastatic VIPoma), with splenic vessel preservation in 11 patients and short gastric vessel preservation in 1. The average operating time was 3.5 hours after enucleation, 4.0 hours after distal pancreatectomy, and 5.0 hours after subtotal pancreatectomy. Pancreatic fistula was observed in two patients after LapE and in three patients after LapPR. Splenectomy for splenic abscess was performed 1 week after surgery in a patient with short gastric vessel splenic preservation. The average hospital stay was 5 days. We concluded that LapPS is a safe method for removing EPTs and CyNPs, although the incidence of pancreatic fistulas remains high. In selected patients LapPS offers significant benefit to patients: reduced trauma to the abdominal wall, short hospital stay, and a quick postoperative recovery.     

Laparoskopische Pankreaskopfresektion

Background

Whereas pancreatic tail resection is routinely and safely performed in several institutions, laparoscopic resection of the pancreatic head is only performed by a handful of surgeons worldwide, none of them in Germany.

Patients and methods

We review our experience with 9 laparoscopic pancreatic head resections (lap-PPPD) performed between March and September 2010. The operations were performed using a hybrid approach with complete laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatic head resection and successive reconstruction via a small retrieval incision. Perioperative outcome was compared to 605 open pancreatic head resections (1997?C2010).

Results

In the group lap-PPPD 3 out of 9 conversions had to be performed due to oncologic reasons. There were no significant differences in perioperative outcome when comparing open-PPPD to lap-PPPD.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic pancreatic head resection with hybrid open reconstruction combines the potential advantages of laparoscopic resection with the safety of an open pancreatic anastomosis. Even at the beginning of the learning curve the procedure can be performed with no concessions to safety or duration of the operation.     

Laparoscopic strategies for resection of insulinomas

Sporadic insulinomas are suitable for the laparoscopic approach because they are solitary, resectable, and not metastatic. Laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasonography (LapUS) can identify lesions that are undetectable by preoperative imaging techniques. However, it is still worthwhile to attempt preoperative imaging by endoscopic ultrasonography to provide useful information for patient positioning and port placement. Laparoscopic pancreatic resection and laparoscopic enucleation are feasible and safe techniques. Conversion to the open approach should be considered for tumors that cannot be identified accurately by LapUS. In patients with insulinomas in the setting of multiple endocrine neoplasia 1, the laparoscopic approach is slightly different. Laparoscopic subtotal distal pancreatectomy preserving the spleen combined with laparoscopic enucleation of any tumors identified in the pancreatic head should be the standard operation. The advantages of laparoscopic pancreatic procedures should be those of all laparoscopic procedures, which obviously reduce the parietal damage in the abdomen. This may be associated with reductions in postoperative pain and hospital stay and an earlier return to previous activity. A cosmetic advantage is also clear because of the absence of long abdominal incision, and this should be taken into account, especially in young women.     

Laparoscopic pancreatic resections

Purpose

Pancreatic surgery is technically complex and requires considerable expertise. Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery adds the need for considerable experience with advanced laparoscopic techniques. Despite the technical difficulties, an increasing number of centers propagate the use of laparoscopy in pancreatic surgery over the last decade.

Methods

In this review, we provide an overview of the literature regarding the advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic pancreatic surgery. Larger prospective randomized studies have emerged in the subset of laparoscopic or retroperitoneoscopic surgery for acute pancreatitis, considerable single center experience has been reported for laparoscopic pancreatic tail resection, and laparoscopic pancreatic head resection, however, is still restricted to a few experienced centers worldwide.

Results and conclusions

Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery is becoming more and more established, in particular for the treatment of benign and premalignant lesions of the pancreatic body and tail. It has been shown to decrease postoperative pain, narcotic use, and length of hospital stay in larger single center experience. However, prospective trials are needed in laparoscopic resective pancreatic surgery to evaluate its advantages, safety, and efficacy in the treatment of pancreatic neoplasms and in particular in malignant pancreatic tumors.     

Laparoscopic approach for solitary insulinoma: a multicentre study

Background Surgical resection of insulinomas is the preferred treatment in order to avoid symptoms of hypoglycaemia. During the past years, advances in laparoscopic techniques have allowed surgeons to approach the pancreas and treat these lesions laparoscopically. We analysed the feasibility, safety, and outcome of patients undergoing laparoscopic resection of insulinomas in a large, retrospective, multicentre study.Methods Thirty-six patients with pancreatic insulinomas were enrolled in this study. All patients were suspected of having solitary insulinomas after preoperative localisation tests and underwent a laparoscopic approach. Patients, operating characteristics and outcome were analysed.Results Mean patient age was 48 years (range 20–77 years). Insulinomas were localised in the head (n=7), isthmus (n=2), body (n=14) or tail (n=13) of the pancreas before laparoscopic approach. Mean size of the lesions was 15.5 mm (range 4–25 mm). The surgical procedure was enucleation in 19 cases (52%), spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy in 12 cases (33%), spleno-pancreatectomy in three cases (8%), one duodenopancreatectomy and one central pancreatectomy. Conversion rate was 30%. The reason for conversion in seven patients (63%) was the inability to localise the tumour during the laparoscopic procedure. In six of these cases laparoscopic ultrasonography was not performed. Mean operating time was 156 min (range 50–420 min). Postoperative course was uneventful in 23 patients (64%). Eleven patients (30%) developed specific complications of pancreatic surgery: intra-abdominal abscess (n=6) or pancreatico-cutaneous fistula (n=5). Mean duration of fistulae was 55 days (range 5–130 days) and all the fistulae were dry at follow-up. After a mean follow-up period of 26 months (range 2–87 months), 33 patients (91%) are free of symptoms, and three patients have been lost to follow-up.Conclusion The laparoscopic approach is safe to treat preoperatively localised insulinoma, with a morbidity rate comparable to that for the open approach. When the tumour is not found during laparoscopy, laparoscopic ultrasonography seems to be the most efficient tool to localise it and probably to prevent conversion.