Phase I study of gemcitabine and liposomal doxorubicin in relapsed ovarian cancer

Twenty-three patients were enrolled in a phase I study conducted to determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) of combined liposomal doxorubicin (CAE) and gemcitabine (GEM) in relapsed ovarian cancer patients. A total of 82 courses are evaluable, with a median number of three cycles administered per patient (range 2-8). GEM was administered on days 1 and 8 by 30-min intravenous infusion immediately after CAE given by 60-min intravenous infusion on day 1; cycles were repeated every 21 days. The starting doses were CAE 20 mg/m(2) and GEM 600 mg/m(2). Following dose levels were 20/800; 20/1,000; 30/800; 30/1,000; 35/800, and 35/1,000 for CAE and GEM, respectively. The MTD was reached at dose level 5, with febrile neutropenia and thrombocytopenia as dose-limiting toxicities. After the MTD, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor was administered in 15% of cycles. Non-hematological toxicity was mild and manageable. All patients are so far evaluable for response. Among them, 5 partial responses (21.7%; 95% confidence interval, CI: 4.9-38.5), 5 disease stabilizations (21.7%, 95% CI: 4.9-38.5) and 13 progressions (56.6%, 95% CI: 36.4-76.8) have been registered. These results warrant further research in a phase II study.     

Weekly gemcitabine and 24-hour infusional 5-fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase I-II study

OBJECTIVE: In this phase I-II study we explored the potential of the combination of weekly gemcitabine (GEM) and 24-hour continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in order to determine the toxicity profile in pancreatic cancer. The efficacy of this drug combination was studied as a secondary endpoint. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with histologically or cytologically proven unresectable or metastatic previously untreated pancreatic adenocarcinoma were included in this study. Two dose levels of GEM and two dose levels of 5-FU were evaluated in three cohorts of patients who received GEM 1,000 mg/m(2) and 5-FU 2,000 mg/m(2), GEM 1,200 mg/m(2) and 5-FU 2,000 mg/m(2), or GEM 1,200 mg/m(2) and 5-FU 2,250 mg/m(2), on days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks, respectively. RESULTS: Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 10% of the cycles. Non-myelosuppressive toxicities included fatigue (22%), grade 1-2 diarrhea (12%) and grade 1 liver toxicity. There was no limiting toxicity and the maximum tolerated dose has not been reached. Two patients experienced a partial response (9.5 +/- 12.6%) and 12 patients had stable disease (57.1 +/- 21.2%). Seven of the 14 symptomatic patients improved their disease-related symptoms and 4 of the 8 patients evaluable for clinical benefit had a clinically beneficial response (50 +/- 34.6%). The median progression-free survival was 6 months (range 2-28), median survival was 11 months (range 3-32+), and the actuarial 1-year survival rate 33%. CONCLUSION: The weekly administration of GEM combined with 24-hour continuous infusion of 5-FU shows a good safety profile at the dose levels evaluated. Some partial responses had also been achieved, disregarding the dose level of the two drugs. Survival confirms the activity of this drug combination.     

吉西他滨为基础的化疗方案治疗进展期胰腺癌的临床研究

背景与目的:进展期胰腺癌预后差.吉西他滨可以改善胰腺癌患者的生存质量,但吉西他滨联合方案疗效是否优于单药,还存在争议,国内更缺乏相关的临床研究.本研究目的是比较吉西他滨为基础的联合化疗方案与吉西他滨单药治疗进展期胰腺癌的疗效.方法:回顾性分析2000～2005年收治的40例经临床或病理确诊的进展期胰腺癌临床资料,其中吉西他滨单药组15例,吉西他滨剂量为1 000 mg/m2,每周1次,连用7周,休息2周,之后每周1次,连用3周,4周重复;吉西他滨联合治疗组25例,联合化疗方案包括吉西他滨1 000 mg/m2,每周1次,连用2周,分别联合:(1)氟尿嘧啶425～600 mg/m2,静脉滴注或持续静脉泵入,d1-5,3周重复;(2)顺铂60～75 mg/m2,分第1、2天,3周重复;(3)奥沙利铂85～130 mg/m2,d1,3周重复;(4)卡培他滨l000 mg/m2,2次/天,d1-14,3周重复.采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线分析患者的生存期,并比较两组间的临床受益反应、中位疾病进展时间、中位生存时间和不良反应.结果:吉西他滨联合组与单药组患者的临床受益反应均得到改善(56.0% vs.46.7%),但疾病控制率、中位生存时间、临床受益反应在两组之间差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05),不良反应的发生率也相似(P＞0.05).对Ⅲ～Ⅳ期患者进行分层分析,发现吉西他滨联合组疾病控制率高于单药组(75.0% vs.45.5%),但无统计学意义(P=0.13).结论:吉西他滨联合方案与单药治疗进展期胰腺癌相比,疗效、临床受益反应、中位生存时间两组相似.     

吉西他滨联合氟尿嘧啶和顺铂治疗晚期胰腺癌

目的：观察吉西他滨（CEM）,氟尿嘧啶（5－FU）及顺铂（DDP）三药联合化疗对晚期胰腺癌的客观疗效及其临床受益反应（CBR）,方法：GEM 800mg/m^2,5-FU 600mg/m^2,DDP 30mg/m^2,于第1,8,15天静滴,28天为1周期,按WHO标准评价疗效,同时综合评估临床受益反应（CBR）指标：疼痛,体力状况及体重变化。结果：全组共29例,25例化疗两周期以上,其中PR6例（24．0％）,NC12例（48．0％）,PC7例（28．0％）,参照CBR综合指标,CBR率为62．1％（18／29）,主要毒性为消化道反应及骨髓抑制,其中血小板Ⅲ-Ⅳ度毒性为27．6％（18／29）,失访18例,结论：吉西他滨联合氟尿嘧啶及顺铂对晚期胰腺癌具有一定的肿瘤客观解率,临床受益反应率高,毒副反应能耐受,值得进一步研究。     

A phase I study of gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with metastatic solid tumors

BACKGROUND: A Phase I study was initiated to determine the maximum tolerated dose of weekly gemcitabine combined with monthly, fixed-dose docetaxel. METHODS: Patients with metastatic solid tumors were treated with docetaxel, 60 mg/m(2), on Day 1 every 28 days. Gemcitabine was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 and underwent dose adjustment in cohorts of 3-6 patients. At the maximum tolerated dose, 11 additional patients were enrolled. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients received 85 cycles of therapy. At the first dose level, the planned gemcitabine dose on Days 1, 8, and 15 was 800 mg/m(2). Two of the 6 patients treated at this dose level experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) requiring the reduction of gemcitabine to 600 mg/m(2) per dose and the administration of ciprofloxacin, 500 mg orally twice daily, on Days 8-18. At the second dose level the first 3 patients experienced no DLTs and the dose of gemcitabine was increased to 700 mg/m(2). Two of the 6 patients treated at the 700 mg/m(2) dose level experienced DLTs. Eleven additional patients were enrolled at the recommended Phase II dose of gemcitabine (600 mg/m(2)). At this dose level, Grade 3/4 (according the National Cancer Institute's common toxicity criteria) neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 12.5% and 2.1% of cycles, respectively. Grade 3 and 4 nonhematologic toxicities were uncommon. Three of seven evaluable patients with pancreatic carcinoma had evidence of significant antineoplastic activity (three partial responses). In addition, two complete responses (one patient with gastric carcinoma and one patient with ovarian carcinoma) and one partial response (patient with hepatocellular carcinoma) were noted in patients with other solid tumors. CONCLUSIONS: The regimen comprised of docetaxel, 60 mg/m(2), on Day 1 and gemcitabine, 600 mg/m(2), on Days 1, 8, and 15 with ciprofloxacin on Days 8-18 every 28 days is safe, well tolerated, and active.     

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the differentiating agent vesnarinone in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the maximum-tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and pharmacokinetic profile of vesnarinone given once daily in combination with gemcitabine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients were treated with oral vesnarinone once daily on a continuous schedule at doses of 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 mg in combination with intravenous (IV) gemcitabine at a dose of 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. To determine whether biologically relevant concentrations were being achieved, predose concentrations (C(min)) of vesnarinone were obtained weekly. Plasma gemcitabine and 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine concentrations were obtained during courses 1 and 2. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were treated with 92 courses of vesnarinone/gemcitabine. The principal toxicities of the regimen consisted of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, which were dose-limiting in two of eight heavily pretreated new patients treated at the 90 mg/1,000 mg/m(2) dose level and one of 10 minimally pretreated new patients at the 120 mg/1,000 mg/m(2) dose level. None of three patients treated with 15 courses at the vesnarinone/gemcitabine dose levels of 60 mg/1,000 mg/m(2) experienced DLT. Pharmacokinetic studies of vesnarinone revealed significant interpatient variability at any given dose level. There was evidence of a linear relationship between vesnarinone dose and mean C(min) at dosages of vesnarinone less than 150 mg, with plateauing of mean C(min) values at higher dosages. There was no impact of vesnarinone on gemcitabine concentrations, and the vesnarinone pharmacokinetics did not change with gemcitabine between weeks 1 and 2. Two partial responses occurred in patients with refractory breast and non-small-cell lung carcinoma. CONCLUSION: When combined with gemcitabine, the recommended dose of vesnarinone for phase II evaluations is 90 mg orally once daily with gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) IV on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. There is no evidence of pharmacokinetic interaction between vesnarinone and gemcitabine. Further studies of vesnarinone as a single agent or in combination with gemcitabine and other antineoplastic agents are warranted.     

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of two sequences of gemcitabine and docetaxel administered weekly to patients with advanced cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and effect of drug sequence on toxicities and pharmacokinetics of the combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel. METHODS: A total of 34 patients with advanced cancers were treated with gemcitabine and docetaxel on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle according to the following dose escalation schedule: level 1, 800 and 30 mg/m2, respectively; level 2, 800 and 40 mg/m2; level 3, 1,000 and 40 mg/m2; and level 4, 1,250 and 40 mg/m2. At each dose level, at least three patients were assigned to one of the two sequences of drug administration: gemcitabine-->docetaxel or docetaxel-->gemcitabine. Once the MTD had been reached, six additional patients, who had received no more than one chemotherapy regimen, were enrolled to dose levels 3 and 4 (gemcitabine-->docetaxel) to determine the MTD in minimally pretreated patients. RESULTS: Neutropenia was the most frequent DLT with an overall incidence of 23.5%. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 62% of patients (8/13) who had received two or more prior chemotherapy regimens, but not at all (0/15) in patients who had received no more than one prior chemotherapy regimens (P< 0.001). Additional DLTs included grade 4 diarrhea and grade 4 stomatitis in one patient each. The MTD was determined to be gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 and docetaxel 40 mg/m2 in patients who had received two or more prior chemotherapy regimens. However, minimally pretreated patients (no more than one prior chemotherapy regimen) were able to tolerate higher doses with an MTD of gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 and docetaxel 40 mg/m2. There were no significant differences in toxicities or pharmacokinetics between the two sequences of administration. Partial and minor responses were observed in 23.5% of patients: non-small-cell lung (two of eight), gastric (two of three), head and neck (one of two), bladder (two of four) and hepatocellular cancer (one of one). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel administered on days 1 and 8 every 21 days was feasible and well tolerated in patients with advanced malignancies. The sequence of administration had no significant effect on the toxicity or pharmacokinetics of either drug. Minimally pretreated patients tolerated higher doses of this combination without significant toxicities. This schedule and combination demonstrated activity in a variety of solid tumors, and merits further evaluation.     

Phase I and pharmacologic study of docetaxel and irinotecan in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I trial of docetaxel, a new antimicrotubule agent, combined with irinotecan (CPT-11), a topoisomerase I inhibitor. The aim was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of docetaxel combined with CPT-11, as well as the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of this combination in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were treated at 4-week intervals with docetaxel (60 minutes, day 2) plus CPT-11 (90 minutes, days 1, 8, and 15). The starting doses of docetaxel/CPT-11 were 30/40 mg/m(2), and doses were escalated in 10-mg/m(2) increments until the MTD was reached. RESULTS: The MTD of docetaxel/CPT-11 was 50/60 mg/m(2) (level 5A), or 60/50 mg/m(2) (level 5B). Neutropenia and diarrhea were the DLTs. CPT-11 did not affect the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel. There were 11 (37%) partial responses among 30 patients. The median survival time was 48 weeks, and the 1-year survival rate was 44.9%. CONCLUSION: The combination of docetaxel and CPT-11 seems to be active against NSCLC, with acceptable toxicity. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 50 mg/m(2) of CPT-11 (days 1, 8, and 15) and 50 mg/m(2) of docetaxel (day 2) administered every 28 days.     

Phase I, dose-finding, and pharmacokinetic study of raltitrexed combined with oxaliplatin in patients with advanced cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the raltitrexed plus oxaliplatin combination regimen, to explore its safety and pharmacokinetics, and to assess its antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients received the combination of raltitrexed plus oxaliplatin. Raltitrexed was administered as a 15-minute infusion followed by oxaliplatin as a 2-hour infusion 1 hour later, repeated every 3 weeks. Seven dose levels were explored, ranging from 2 to 3.75 mg/m(2) and from 85 to 130 mg/m(2) for raltitrexed and oxaliplatin, respectively. The pharmacokinetics of both raltitrexed and oxaliplatin was assessed at the last three dose levels. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were assessable for toxicity. Severe toxicities usually occurred from dose level V (raltitrexed 3 mg/m(2) and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2)). This combination was not myelosuppressive, eliciting only sporadic grades 3 and 4 neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia without complications. There was no alopecia. DLTs were asthenia and nausea/vomiting, despite systematic antiemetic prophylaxis. Dose level VI (raltitrexed 3.5 mg/m(2) and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2)) was deemed to be the MTD. Eight confirmed partial responses were observed: six patients with malignant mesothelioma (both pretreated and nonpretreated), one with fluorouracil-refractory pancreatic carcinoma, and one with renal carcinoma. Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of both drugs did not suggest any drug interaction. CONCLUSION: The combination of raltitrexed and oxaliplatin given as consecutive short infusions every 3 weeks seems to be an acceptable regimen that allows a dose-intensity as high as the sum of the recommended doses of each agent given alone. The dose recommended for further phase II studies is raltitrexed 3 mg/m(2) and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. Promising antitumor activity has been observed in patients with malignant mesothelioma.     

Phase I study of gemcitabine (GEM) and docetaxel (TXT) combination chemotherapy for unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer

A phase I study of gemcitabine (GEM) and docetaxel (TXT) combination chemotherapy was performed for unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer. Chemotherapy consisted of a fixed dose of GEM (1,000 mg/m2) on day 1, 8 and an escalated dose of TXT (50, 60, 70 mg/m2) on day 8 every 21 days, > or = 2 courses. Nine patients were entered (each dose level: 3 patients). Leukopenia, neutropenia, GOT increase, GPT increase, anorexia, fatigue, fever, and alopecia occurred, but no dose-limiting toxicity was found at any dose level and no MTD was reached. The recommended dose for the phase II study is GEM 1,000 mg/m2 and TXT 70 mg/m2 with consideration of application to outpatients and continuing courses.     

Phase I study of docetaxel in combination with cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer

This phase I was study conducted to establish the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicity, and recommended dose of docetaxel in combination with cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Twenty-six patients were treated with cyclophosphamide (600 mg m(-2), intravenous bolus) followed by docetaxel (60, 75 or 85 mg m(-2), 1-h intravenous infusion) every 3 weeks. The maximum tolerated dose was docetaxel 85 mg m(-2) with cyclophosphamide 600 mg m(-2), the dose-limiting toxicity being febrile neutropenia. Grade 4 neutropenia was experienced by all patients, but was generally brief. Otherwise, the combination was well tolerated with few acute and no chronic non-haematological toxicities of grade 3/4. Activity was observed at all dose levels and disease sites, and the overall response rate was 42% (95% confidence interval 22-61%). The pharmacokinetics of docetaxel were not modified by cyclophosphamide coadministration. These findings establish a recommended dose of docetaxel 75 mg m(-2) in combination with cyclophosphamide 600 mg m(-2) every three weeks for phase II evaluation.     

A dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study of biweekly pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumours

To determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), paclitaxel (PCX) and gemcitabine (GEM) combination administered biweekly in patients with advanced solid tumours. Twenty-two patients with advanced-stage solid tumours were treated with escalated doses of PLD on day 1 and PCX plus GEM on day 2 (starting doses: 10, 100 and 800 mg m(-2), respectively) every 2 weeks. DLTs and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of all drugs were determined during the first cycle of treatment. All but six (73%) patients had previously received at least one chemotherapy regimen. The DLT dose level was reached at PLD 12 mg m(-2), PCX 110 mg m(-2) and GEM 1000 mg m(-2) with neutropaenia being the dose-limiting event. Of the 86 chemotherapy cycles delivered, grade 3 and 4 neutropaenia occurred in 20% with no cases of febrile neutropaenia. Non-haematological toxicities were mild. The recommended MTDs are PLD 12 mg m(-2), PCX 100 mg m(-2) and GEM 1000 mg m(-2) administered every 2 weeks. The PK data revealed no obvious drug interactions. Biweekly administration of PLD, PCX and GEM is a well-tolerated chemotherapy regimen, which merits further evaluation in various types of solid tumours.     

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of flavopiridol in children with refractory solid tumors: a Children's Oncology Group Study.

PURPOSE: To determine the dose-limiting toxicities, maximum-tolerated dose, and pharmacokinetics of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor flavopiridol (NSC 649890) when administered as a 1-hour infusion over 3 consecutive days to children with recurrent or refractory solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Flavopiridol was administered as a 1-hour intravenous infusion daily for 3 consecutive days every 21 days, or when hematologic toxicity or any grade 2 or greater nonhematologic toxicity resolved. The starting dose was 37.5 mg/m2/d. Dose escalation was in cohorts of three patients in a standard fashion until dose-limiting toxicity and the maximum-tolerated dose were determined. Flavopiridol levels were measured on days 1, 2, and 3. RESULTS: Twenty-five children received flavopiridol at doses of 37.5 to 80 mg/m2/day over 3 consecutive days. The maximum-tolerated dose was 62.5 mg/m2/d. The primary dose-limiting toxicities were neutropenia and diarrhea. No antitumor effect was observed in this population. Mean peak plasma concentrations of 3.71 and 9.11 micromol/L were achieved at the end of the 1-hour infusion, following dose escalation from 37.5 mg/m2 to 80 mg/m2, respectively. The median flavopiridol plasma clearance was 8.0 L/h/m2 (range, 2.6 to 17.1 L/h/m2). CONCLUSION: The maximum-tolerated dose of flavopiridol in children, and the recommended phase II dose for pediatric studies, was 62.5 mg/m2/day when administered as a 1-hour infusion for 3 consecutive days. Dose-limiting toxicities of neutropenia and diarrhea were similar to those in adult studies.     

Gemcitabine (GEM), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) in patients with different gastroenteric malignancies

This phase II clinical trial was performed in order to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, toxicity and anti-tumor activity of a novel combination of gemcitabine (GEM), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) designed on a specific translational basis. Every 4 weeks, 44 patients with various gastroenteric malignancies, 29 of whom had pancreas carcinoma, received a short intravenous (i.v.) infusion of FA (100 mg/m2) and 5-FU (400 mg/m2) on days 1-5, and GEM 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 16. Our results suggest that, although this treatment leads to hematological and gastroenteric toxicity, it is very active in patients with pancreatic carcinoma. We therefore believe that an improved version would merit further investigation in larger scale trials.     

低分割高剂量适形放疗同步吉西他滨治疗胰腺癌的Ⅰ期临床研究

目的　探讨低分割、高剂量适形放疗同步吉西他滨治疗不可切除胰腺癌的放疗靶区最大耐受剂量和剂量限制性毒性反应。方法　采用“３＋３”试验设计模式,１０例经病理组织学证实不可手术切除的初治胰腺癌患者接受同步放化疗,放疗采用低分割、高剂量适形放疗,单次剂量为４Ｇｙ,３次／周,靶区累积照射剂量以４Ｇｙ逐渐累加,直至出现限制性剂量毒性反应,靶区累积剂量ＤＴ４８Ｇｙ～５６Ｇｙ／１２～１４ｆ;同步给予吉西他滨每周６００ｍｇ／ｍ２,静滴,１次／周,共７周。观察治疗疗效和毒性反应,并进行生存随访。结果　当靶区ＤＴ达到５６Ｇｙ／１４ｆ时,出现剂量限制性毒性反应,主要表现为血３～４级血小板减少或粒细胞减少,故终止试验。获ＣＲ１例,ＰＲ３例,ＳＤ５例,ＰＤ１例,中位生存期为１２个月。结论　对于不可切除胰腺癌,推荐采用吉西他滨６００ｍｇ／ｍ２,１次／周同步放疗,三维适形放疗采用低分割、高剂量模式,靶区最大耐受剂量为ＤＴ５２Ｇｙ／１３ｆ,３次／周。     

Postoperative adjuvant gemcitabine and concurrent radiation after curative resection of pancreatic head carcinoma: a phase II study

PURPOSE: The addition of radiation to adjuvant 5-fluorouracil for the treatment of pancreatic cancer has not yet shown any definite benefit. Gemcitabine (GEM) has potential activity in advanced pancreatic cancer and is a powerful radiosensitizer. We evaluated the feasibility of postoperative administration of GEM alone, followed by concurrent GEM and irradiation (RT) after curative resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: GEM 1000 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 8 every 21 days for three courses was given within 8 weeks after surgery and was followed by GEM 300 mg/m(2) weekly +40 Gy in a split course. Twenty-two patients (median age 59 years, range 39-74, Performance Status 0-1) with Stage II and III curatively resected pancreatic head adenocarcinoma were included. RESULTS: For GEM alone, all patients received the three planned courses, with dose reductions in 7 (32%) of 22 patients. All patients, except two, completed full chemoradiation; one received only 20 Gy because of both World Health Organization Grade 4 vomiting and thrombopenia and the other stopped RT after 32 Gy because of early disease progression. No reduction in GEM during RT was necessary; no toxic death was noted; and World Health Organization Grade 3-4 hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities occurred in 8 (36%) and 7 (nausea, vomiting) (32%) of 22 patients respectively. No late toxicity developed. After a median follow-up of 15 months, 11 patients were alive, and 2 patients had died of causes unrelated to their disease or toxicity, The median disease-free survival and overall survival was 6 and 15 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: This adjuvant regimen was well tolerated and can be easily administered after curative surgery for pancreatic cancer. Its intensification with continuous RT is currently being investigated.     

Vinorelbine/gemcitabine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a phase I trial

Vinorelbine and gemcitabine are both active as single agents in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Because of their different mechanisms of action, good tolerability and possible administration on an out-patient basis, vinorelbine/gemcitabine should be an interesting combination for palliative chemotherapy. Thus, we initiated a phase I dose-escalation trial in order to determine the maximum tolerated doses of vinorelbine/gemcitabine that can be administered without haematopoietic growth factors, the dose-limiting toxicities and the most frequent side-effects of this novel combination. 40 chemotherapy-na?ve patients with advanced NSCLC were treated with different doses of vinorelbine/gemcitabine on days 1, 8 and 15, and this treatment cycle was repeated on day 29. Vinorelbine and gemcitabine were escalated from 10 to 30 mg/m2 and 600 to 1200 mg/m2, respectively. A total of 63 treatment cycles were administered and 27 patients received at least two treatment cycles. Dose-limiting toxicities were leucopenia plus thrombocytopenia (2 patients) and mucositis (1 patient). The maximum tolerated dose was established at 25 mg/m2 vinorelbine combined with 1200 mg/m2 gemcitabine. Frequent side-effects were leucopenia, anaemia, nausea/vomiting, flu-like symptoms, skin rashes and elevation of liver enzymes. The recommended phase II doses are 20-25 mg/m2 vinorelbine combined with 1000-1200 mg/m2 gemcitabine on days 1, 8 and 15, but myelosuppression will have to be carefully monitored.     

Clinical and pharmacokinetic phase I study of multitargeted antifolate (LY231514) in combination with cisplatin.

PURPOSE: Multitargeted antifolate (MTA; LY231514) has broad preclinical antitumor activity and inhibits a variety of intracellular enzymes involved in the folate pathways. This study was designed to (1) determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), and pharmacokinetics of MTA combined with cisplatin; (2) determine a recommended dose for phase II studies; and (3) collect anecdotal information on the antitumor activity of MTA combined with cisplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with solid tumors received MTA intravenously over 10 minutes and cisplatin over 2 hours once every 21 days. In cohort 1, both agents were administered on day 1 starting with MTA 300 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 60 mg/m(2). In cohort 2, MTA (500 or 600 mg/m(2)) was administered on day 1, followed by cisplatin (75 mg/m(2)) on day 2. RESULTS: In cohort 1, 40 assessable patients received 159 courses of treatment. The MTD was MTA 600 mg/m(2)/cisplatin 100 mg/m(2). DLTs were reversible leukopenia/neutropenia and delayed fatigue. Hydration before cisplatin therapy did not influence MTA pharmacokinetics. Eleven objective remissions included one complete response in a patient with relapsed squamous cell head and neck carcinoma, and partial responses in four of ten patients with epithelial pleural mesothelioma. In cohort 2, 11 assessable patients received 23 courses of treatment. The MTD was MTA 600 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2). DLTs were neutropenic sepsis, diarrhea, and skin toxicity. Two patients died of treatment-related complications during the study. Two patients had objective remissions (one mesothelioma patient, one colon cancer patient). CONCLUSION: The combination of MTA and cisplatin is clinically active, and administering both agents on day 1 is superior to a split schedule. Further development of this combination for mesothelioma is warranted.     

A dose escalation study of docetaxel plus capecitabine in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors

Capecitabine (CAP), gemcitabine (GEM), and docetaxel (DOC) have shown interesting activity in a wide range of solid tumors. A phase I study was conducted in order to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of their combination in patients with refractory solid tumors. Eighteen patients were enrolled. The patients' median age was 60 years, 15 were male, and 11 were chemo-naive. DOC was administered on day 1 as an 1-h (IV) infusion at escalating doses ranging from 40 to 50 mg/m2. GEM was administered on day 1 as a 30-min (IV) infusion at a standard dose of 1500 mg/m2. CAP was administered orally on days 1 to 7 at escalating doses ranging from 1750 to 2500 mg/m2 given as two daily divided doses. Treatment was repeated every 2 weeks. Five different dose levels were examined. At dose level V two out of three enrolled patients presented DLTs (one patient grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 stomatitis and another grade 3 diarrhea), and thus the recommended MTD for future phase II studies are CAP 2250 mg/m2, DOC 50 mg/m2, and GEM 1500 mg/m2. A total of 124 treatment cycles were administered. Toxicity was generally mild. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in eight (7%) treatment cycles and grade 3 thrombocytopenia in one (1%). There was no febrile episode. Grade 2/3 asthenia was observed in six (33%) patients, grade 2/3 diarrhea in four (22%), and grade 2/3 hand-foot syndrome in three (17%). Other toxicities were uncommon. There was no treatment-related death. One (6%) CR, four (25%) PRs, and six (38%) SD were observed among 16 evaluable patients. Responses were seen in patients with breast (one CR), gastric (three PRs), and pancreatic (one PR) cancer. These results demonstrate that CAP, DOC, and GEM can be safely combined at clinically relevant doses and this regimen merits further evaluation.     

Phase I study of escalating doses of oxaliplatin in combination with fixed dose gemcitabine in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: Oxaliplatin (OHP) is a new platinum antineoplastic, while gemcitabine (GEM) is one of the most active drugs against non-small cell carcinoma (NSCLC). The OHP/GEM combination is interesting because the drugs have different mechanisms of action and toxicity profiles. The primary endpoint of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of OHP/GEM combination in non-small cell carcinoma of the lung. METHODS: Patients with relapsed NSCLC were treated with fixed dose i.v. GEM (1250 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8; followed on day 1 by i.v. OHP over 3 h, starting from 70 mg/m2 with 20 mg/m2 increments, up to 130 mg/m2. We enrolled 19 patients with eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) status 0/1=13/6; male/female=13/6. All had received first-line and four second-line chemotherapy. RESULTS: Four patients dropped out. At dose level 2, one patient died of pulmonary embolism; at level 3, two patients died of disease progression. One patient at level 3, refused to continue treatment after allergic reaction (high fever episode) during infusion of third cycle. Fifteen patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. According to a priori statistical considerations, three patients in each of the first three treatment levels and six in the last level were evaluable. No G3-4 toxicity was observed at levels 1 and 2. G3 neutropenia and anemia occurred in 8% of cycles at level 3. Six patients entered level 4 (OHP 130 mg/m2) with 22 courses delivered: G3-4 neutropenia occurred in 9%, G1-2 thrombocytopenia in 18%; other toxicities were mainly limited to G1-2 flu-like syndrome in about one third of patients and G1-2 nausea and vomiting in 5% of courses. There was no myelo-DLT at the highest dose level. There was no neurotoxicity at any level. Treatment was delayed in 12% and dose reduced in 26% of courses. There were 2/15 PR. CONCLUSIONS: MTD was not reached. OHP and GEM can probably be administered safely at 130 and 1250 mg/m2, respectively, as first-line therapy. The schedule is being used in a phase II trial.