Catheter ablation for hemodynamically unstable monomorphic ventricular tachycardia

INTRODUCTION: Hemodynamic collapse precludes extensive catheter mapping to identify focal target regions in many patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) associated with heart disease. This study tested the feasibility of catheter ablation of poorly tolerated VTs by targeting a region identified during sinus rhythm. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ablation was attempted in five patients, ages 44 to 59 years, with left ventricular ejection fractions of 0.15 to 0.20 and poorly tolerated VT causing multiple implantable defibrillator therapies (6 to 30 episodes/month). VT was due to prior infarction in three patients and nonischemic cardiomyopathy in two. Target regions were sought that met the following criteria: (1) evidence of slow conduction from fractionated sinus rhythm electrograms and stimulus-QRS delays during pace mapping, and (2) evidence that the region contains the reentrant circuit exit from pace mapping. In 4 of 5 patients, a target region was identified and radiofrequency lesions applied. Ablation abolished all recurrences of VT in 3 of 4 patients during follow-up of 14 to 22 months. There were no complications. CONCLUSION: Ablation of poorly tolerated VT is feasible in some patients by mapping during sinus rhythm and performing ablation over a region of identifiable scar that contains abnormal conduction and a presumptive VT exit.     

Strategies for catheter ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) due to reentry in and around regions of ventricular scar from an old myocardial infarction or cardiomyopathic process is often a difficult management problem. Radiofrequency catheter ablation is an option for controlling frequent VT episodes. Patient and VT characteristics determine the mapping and ablation approach and efficacy. In patients with a VT that is hemodynamically tolerated to allow mapping, prevention of recurrent VT is achieved in 54% to 66% of patients with a procedure related mortality of 1% to 2.7%. Multiple morphologies of monomorphic VT and circuits that are located deep to the endocardium are common problems that reduce efficacy. Mapping to identify target regions for ablation can be difficult if VT is rapid and not tolerated, or not inducible. Ablation of these “unmappable VTs” by designing ablation lines or areas based on the characteristics of the scar as assessed during sinus rhythm, and using approaches to assess global activation from a limited number of beats has been shown to be feasible. Ablation of multiple VTs, epicardial VTs, and poorly tolerated VTs are feasible. Future studies defining efficacy and risks are needed.     

Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Multiple Morphologies of Ventricular Tachycardia by Targeting a Single Region of the Left Ventricle

Radiofrequency Ablation of Multiple VTs. Introduction : As treatment options for ventricular tachycardia (VT) continue to evolve, the use of radiofrequency catheter ablation is rapidly expanding. However, in the presence of multiple morphologies of VT, achieving successful results may seem less likely. We report two patients with multiple morphologies of VT who underwent successful radiofrequency ablation by application of adiofrequency energy to a single region in the left ventricle.
Methods and Results : Two patients, each without any apparent cardiac dysfunction and a history of documented VT, were referred to our institution for further management. They underwent an electrophysiologic study and were found to have easily inducible VT, of three morphologies in one patient and two in the other. Using a transaortic approach, left ventricular mapping was performed for detecting a site with presystolic potentials, earliest ventricular activation, or both. Application of radiofrequency energy to a single area in the left ventricle resulted in the elimination of all previously inducible VT in each patient.
Conclusion : VTs with distinctly different morphologies can occur in patients with no detectable structural heart disease. These VT circuits may share a common pathway and, therefore, may readily be amenable to therapy with radiofrequency catheter ablation.     

伴右心室出口的左心室起源缺血性室性心动过速的标测和消融

目的折返性的缺血性室性心动过速（VT）绝大多数发生于左心室并表现为右束支阻滞（RBBB）图形。本文报道1组VT折返环位于左心室但出口在右心室且表现为左束支阻滞（LBBB）的病例。方法32例因陈旧性心肌梗死伴VT而接受电生理检查和射频消融的患者,其中4例临床有LBBB形态的VT。使用非接触等电位和虚拟单极标测判断VT起源,结合舒张中期电位（MDP）和拖带标测确定折返关键通路和消融靶点。用盐水冲洗电极导管在折返环的关键峡部行线性消融。结果全部32例患者中,4例临床有LBBB型VT者均成功被诱发,其中1例有两种LBBB型VT,1例同时有RBBB型VT但周长与LBBB型相同;另有1例共有6种形态的VT,包括RBBB和LBBB型。在右心室内的非接触式等电位标测可迅速确定VT在右心室的传出部位,该处的虚拟单极标测显示rS型提示左心室起源。3例在左心室成功拖带并消融成功,靶点均紧邻左心室间隔,其中1例位于下壁,1例在前壁,1例两种LBBB型VT分别在前壁和下壁间隔旁消融成功。随访1～4．2年,未服抗心律失常药无VT发作。而1例诱发出6种单形（包括RBBB和LBBB型）VT患者因巨大室壁瘤及心功能障碍不能耐受而中途放弃消融。结论紧邻室间隔的前壁和下壁心肌梗死后的左心室起源VT可能因在右心室有出口而表现为LBBB型,需要在标测和消融时予以注意。     

Substrate Characterization and Catheter Ablation for Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Apical Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

VT Ablation in Apical Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy . Introduction: Monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) is uncommon in apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). The purpose of this study was to define the substrate and role of catheter ablation for VT in apical HCM. Methods: Four patients with apical HCM and frequent, drug refractory VT (mean age of 46 ± 10 years, left ventricular [LV] ejection fraction; 54 ± 14%) underwent catheter ablation with the use of electroanatomic mapping. Endocardial mapping was performed in 4 patients and 3 patients underwent epicardial mapping. Results: In 3 patients, VT was related to areas of scar in the apical LV where maximal apical wall thickness ranged from 14.5 to 17.8 mm, and 2 patients had apical aneurysms. Endocardial and epicardial substrate mapping revealed low voltage (<1.5 mV) scar in both endocardial and epicardial LV in 2 and only in the epicardium in 1 patient. Inducible VT was abolished with a combination of endocardial and epicardial ablation in 2 patients, but was ineffective in the third patient who had intramural reentry that required transcoronary ethanol ablation of an obtuse marginal vessel for abolition. The fourth patient had focal nonsustained repetitive VT from right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT), consistent with idiopathic RVOT‐VT, that was successfully ablated. During follow‐ups of 3‐9 months, all patients remained free from VT. Conclusion: Monomorphic VT in apical HCM can be due to endocardial, epicardial or intramural reentry in areas of apical scar. Epicardial ablation or transcoronary alcohol ablation is required in some cases. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 22, pp. 41‐48, January 2011)     

Cryocatheter ablation of right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia

INTRODUCTION: Cryocatheter techniques have been successfully applied to treat supraventricular tachycardia but there are no reports on their value in treating ventricular tachycardia (VT). We present our initial experience with cryocatheter ablation of right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) tachycardia. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cryocatheter ablation was attempted in 14 patients (13 females, age 45.9 +/- 12.7 years) who were highly symptomatic due to frequent monomorphic ventricular extrasystole (VES) or nonsustained VT originating within the RVOT. A 9-Fr, 8-mm-tip cryocatheter was used for both mapping and ablation. Cryoablation was started after localizing the arrhythmic focus by pace and activation mapping. Ablation success, defined by complete disappearance of target VES/VT acutely and during a follow-up of 9.3 +/- 1.4 weeks, was achieved in 13 of 14 patients. Ablation was successful with local activation times of 35 +/- 4 ms, 5.8 +/- 3.3 applications, 18.8 +/- 7.5 minutes total cryo time, 9.4 +/- 4.2 minutes fluoroscopy time, and 66.9 +/- 26.1 minutes total procedure time, the latter two measures showing a reduction with number of patients treated. Three patients reported slight pain related to local pressure of the catheter on the RVOT wall. No pain was described related to delivery of cryothermal energy. CONCLUSIONS: Initial experience shows that focal VES/VT originating in the RVOT can be successfully treated using cryocatheter ablation. Acute and short term success rates, fluoroscopy times, and duration of procedure are comparable to conventional ablation techniques. A major advantage seems to be the virtual absence of ablation related pain.     

室性心律失常的导管消融——“百尺竿头，更进一步”

Catheter ablation is now an important option to control drug-refractory ventricular arrhythmias.Ablation is highly effective for ventriculal arrhythmia originating from outflow tract and idiopathic left ventricular tachycardias(VT).Catheter ablation of hemodynamically unstable scar-related VT,which frequently occurs in patients with remote myocardial infarction,dilated/hypertrophic cardiomyopahties and after surgical correction of congenital heart disease,is still a challenge for electrophysiologists.In the last decade,catheter ablation in this field has rapidly evolved and has made a big progression with a introduction of 3-D mapping system and new ablation catheter.However,it requires further investigation to identify the high-risk patients and to understand the arrhythmia substrate and improve lesion formation in the ventricle.     

Catheter Ablation for Scar-related Ventricular Tachycardias

Patients with scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) are subject to frequent arrhythmia recurrences; antiarrhythmic drug therapy has been disappointing due to poor efficacy and side effects. Patients receiving multiple implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks because of VT have impaired quality of life. The role of catheter ablation in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias has been increasing in the last 2 decades. As more knowledge is gained about the mechanisms of VT, the potential for doing ablation has increased. Now, multiple VTs and unstable VTs can be targeted by ablation strategies. Also, electroanatomic mapping systems have made substrate mapping feasible. The purpose of this article is to review the selection and preparation of patients who require catheter ablation for scar-related VT, the different mapping techniques, and the ablation strategies employed. An overview of the pathophysiology of scar-related VT and the variety of heart diseases that are related to scar-related VT is provided.     

Mapping and radiofrequency catheter ablation of the three types of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in nonischemic heart disease

INTRODUCTION: Sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) associated with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (CMP) is uncommon. Optimal approaches to catheter mapping and ablation are not well characterized, but they are likely to depend on the VT mechanism. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mechanisms of sustained monomorphic VT encountered in nonischemic CMP and to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of catheter radiofrequency ablation for treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-six consecutive patients with nonischemic CMP referred for management of recurrent VT were studied. In 16 (62%) patients, VT was related to a region of abnormal electrograms consistent with scar and the response to pacing suggested a reentrant mechanism. In 5 (19%) patients, VT was due to bundle branch or interfascicular reentry. In 7 (27%) patients, the VT mechanism was focal automaticity, 4 of whom had evidence of tachycardia-induced CMP. After catheter ablation targeting parts of reentrant circuits, VT was not inducible in 8 (53%) of 15 patients with scar-related reentry, was modified in 5 (33%) patients, and still was inducible in 2 (13%) patients. Ablation was successful in 5 of 5 patients with bundle branch reentry and in 6 of 7 patients with a focal automaticity mechanism. Overall, catheter ablation abolished clinical recurrence of VT in 20 (77%) of 26 patients during a follow-up of 15 +/- 12 months. CONCLUSION: Three different mechanisms of VT are encountered in patients with nonischemic CMP. The mapping and ablation approach varies with the type of VT. In this selected population, the overall efficacy was 77%.     

Role of Epicardial Mapping in Catheter Ablation of Postmyocardial Infarction Ventricular Tachycardia

The role of epicardial mapping for radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of postmyocardial infarction monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) is still under investigation. We present two septuagenarian patients with a history of myocardial infarction, poor left ventricular function, and drug-refractory monomorphic VT who were treated with RF catheter ablation. The first patient had a history of myocardial infarction, left ventricular aneurysm, and mitral valve replacement complicated by recurrent drug refractory VT and congestive heart failure. The second patient had ischemic cardiomyopathy and VT and was implanted with a cardioverter defibrillator and subsequently suffered repeated episodes of VT refractory to multiple antiarrhythmic drugs. In both patients, coronary sinus mapping was performed with a multipolar catheter as endocardial mapping did not reveal satisfactory sites for ablation. Epicardial catheter mapping provided stable electrograms and identification of areas of slow conduction during VT. RF lesions guided by epicardial mapping resulted in successful ablation of VT and no recurrence at long-term follow-up. This report emphasizes the potential usefulness of coronary sinus mapping as an adjuvant to endocardial mapping to guide VT ablation.     

Endocardial and Epicardial Ablation Guided by Nonsurgical Transthoracic Epicardial Mapping to Treat Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia

Nonsurgical Epicardial Ablation. Introduction : An epicardial site of origin of ventricular tachycardia (VT) may explain unsuccessful endocardial radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation. A new technique to map the epicardial surface of the heart through pericardial puncture was presented recently and opened the possibility of using epicardial mapping to guide endocardial ablation or epicardial catheter ablation. We report the efficacy and safety of these two approaches to treat 10 consecutive patients with VT and Chagas' disease.
Methods and Results : Epicardial mapping was carried out with a regular steerable catheter introduced into the pericardial space. An epicardial circuit was found in 14 of 18 mapable VTs induced in 10 patients. Epicardial mapping was used to guide endocardial ablation in 4 patients and epicardial ablation in 6. The epicardial earliest activation site occurred 107 ± 60 msec earlier than the onset of the QRS complex. At the epicardial site used to guide endocardial ablation, earliest activation occurred 75 ± 55 msec before the QRS complex. Epicardial mid-diastolic potentials and/or continuous electrical activity were seen in 7 patients. After 4.8 ± 2.9 seconds of epicardial RF applications, VT was rendered noninducible. Hemopericardium requiring drainage occurred in 1 patient; 3 others developed pericardial friction without hemopericardium. Patients remain asymptomatic 5 to 9 months after the procedure. Interruption during endocardial pulses occurred after 20.2 ± 14 seconds (P = 0.004), hut VT was always reinducible and the patients experienced a poor outcome.
Conclusion : Epicardial mapping does not enhance the effectiveness of endocardial pulses of RF. Epicardial applications of RF energy can safely and effectively treat patients with VT and Chagas' disease.     

Endocardial catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ventricular assist devices

BACKGROUND: The outcomes of patients with ventricular assist devices (VADs) who undergo catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) have not been reported. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of endocardial VT ablation in patients with VADs. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed three cases at our institution where endocardial catheter ablation was performed in patients with VADs and incessant VT. RESULTS: Three patients with underlying cardiomyopathies and VADs underwent VT ablation for incessant VT refractory to multiple antiarrhythmic medications. In each case, VT was either eliminated or significantly ameliorated by catheter ablation. No procedure-related complications occurred. The hemodynamic stability afforded by the VAD played an important role in facilitating ablation in two of the cases. CONCLUSION: Catheter ablation for VT in VAD patients appears to be feasible, safe, and effective based on our initial experience. Several technical issues, such as decreases in ventricular volumes that can limit maneuverability of the ablation catheter and potential entrapment of the mapping catheter in the inflow cannula, need to be considered at the time of ablation.     

Identification and ablation of three types of ventricular tachycardia involving the his-purkinje system in patients with heart disease

INTRODUCTION: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) with involvement of the His-Purkinje system (HPS) can be difficult to recognize in patients with heart disease, but it may be particularly susceptible to ablation targeting the HPS. This study defines the incidence and types of HPS involvement in VT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Involvement of the HPS was sought during electrophysiologic study with catheter mapping in 234 consecutive patients referred for catheter ablation of recurrent VT associated with heart disease. HPS VT was observed in 20 (8.5%) patients (mean ejection fraction 29%+/- 17%); in 9 (11%) of 81 patients with nonischemic heart disease and 11 (7.1%) of 153 patients with coronary artery disease (P = NS). Three types of HPS VT were observed: 16 patients (group 1) had typical bundle branch reentry, 2 patients (group 2) had bundle branch reentry and interfascicular reentry, and 2 patients (group 3) had VT consistent with a focal origin in the distal HPS. In all three groups, the VT QRS had morphologic similarity to the sinus rhythm QRS. Ablation of HPS VT was successful in all patients in whom it was attempted but produced high-degree AV block in 6 (30%). In 12 patients (60%), other VTs due to reentry through scar also were inducible. CONCLUSION: Involvement of the HPS in VT associated with heart disease has three distinct clinical forms, all of which are susceptible to ablation. Ablation often is not sufficient as the sole therapy due to other induced VT's and conduction abnormalities, requiring pacemaker and/or defibrillator implantation.     

Use of a saline-irrigated tip catheter for ablation of ventricular tachycardia resistant to conventional radiofrequency ablation: early experience

INTRODUCTION: Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) may fail if the critical isthmus is located intramyocardially or epicardially. The design of a saline-irrigated tip (SIT) catheter (Thermo-Cool, Cordis-Webster) involves active cooling of the tip electrode, which allows creation of larger ablation lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eight patients (6 men, age 59 +/- 12 years) in whom the clinical target VT (cycle length 430 +/- 97 msec) could not be ablated using a conventional 4-mm tip RF ablation catheter underwent additional attempts to ablate this VT using a SIT catheter. Six patients had an old myocardial infarction, 1 patient had a dilated cardiomyopathy, and 1 patient had a structurally normal heart. Ablation of the clinical target VT using a SIT catheter was attempted from the left ventricle in 6 (septal, posterobasal, and inferior: 2 each) and from the right ventricle in 2 patients (both septal), by entrainment (n = 6), activation (n = 1), or pace mapping (n = 1). A mean of 6 +/- 5 (range 2 to 15) pulses were delivered. Target VT ablation was successful in 5 patients (63%). After successful ablation, at a mean follow-up of 6.5 +/- 4 months and while taking antiarrhythmic drugs, all 5 patients were free of VT recurrences. CONCLUSION: The clinical target VT could be ablated using a SIT catheter in 5 (63%) of the 8 patients in whom ablation using a conventional RF catheter was unsuccessful. In the 2 patients with septal VT, a biventricular approach to mapping and ablation was required.     

Ablation of ventricular tachycardia in the setting of coronary artery disease

Ablation of reentrant ventricular tachycardia (VT) is an accepted therapy for certain patients with VT caused by coronary artery disease (CAD). Its use is currently limited to patients with sustained, monomorphic, hemodynamically tolerated VT. The use of entrainment in mapping reentrant VT has made possible increasingly accurate localization of critical sites on the reentrant pathway that are amenable to ablation. Recent work has examined the accuracy with which various mapping criteria are able to predict successful ablation of reentrant VT in patients with CAD. Other recent studies have investigated attempted ablation of all inducible VTs in patients with multiple VT morphologies. In the future, substrate mapping may make possible ablation of VT in patients with nonsustained or fast, hemodynamically unstable VTs, thus allowing VT ablation to become a first-line therapy for many patients with VT in the setting of CAD.     

Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia

VT Ablation in Right Ventricular Dysplasia. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD) is a genetically determined myocardial disease characterized by fibrofatty replacement of the right ventricular wall. Ventricular tachyarrhythmias can be seen in the early stages of the disease, which is one of the most important causes of sudden death in young healthy individuals. Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation is an option for the treatment of medically refractory ventricular arrhythmias and it has shown to successfully abolish recurrent ventricular tachycardias (VT) as well as reduce the frequency in defibrillator therapies. However, variable acute and long‐term success rates have been reported. The current mapping and ablation techniques include activation and entrainment mapping during tolerated VT and substrate ablation using 3‐dimensional electroanatomic mapping systems. This article aims at providing a comprehensive review of RF catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias in the context of ARVD. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 473‐14, April 2010)     

Mechanisms and catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia

In summary, in patients who have structural heart disease, VT usually originates from the left ventricle, is frequently life threatening, and a defibrillator is usually required. Ablation can be successful regardless of the hemodynamic stability of the tachycardia and usually depends on whether or not one can identify the diseased substrate. In the absence of structural heart disease, VT usually originates from the right ventricle and oftentimes the outflow tract. It's typically not life threatening, and first-line therapy can be either drugs or ablation.     

Repeat percutaneous epicardial mapping and ablation of ventricular tachycardia: safety and outcome

Safety and Efficacy of Repeat Epicardial Access. Introduction: Epicardial mapping and ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) has been increasingly performed. Occasionally additional ablation is necessary, requiring repeat percutaneous access to the pericardial space. Methods and Results: We studied 30 consecutive patients who required a repeat epicardial procedure. We specifically examined the success and safety of repeat percutaneous pericardial access as well as the ability to map and ablate epicardial VT targets. Percutaneous pericardial access at a median of 110 days after the last procedure was successful in all 30 patients. Significant adhesions interfering with catheter mapping were encountered in 7 patients (23%); 6 had received intrapericardial triamcinolone acetate (IPTA) with prior procedures. Using blunt dissection with a deflected ablation catheter and a steerable sheath, adhesions were divided allowing for complete catheter mapping in 5 patients with areas of dense adherence compartmentalizing the pericardium in 1 patient and precluding ablation over previously targeted ablation site in the second. Targeted VT noninducibility was achieved in 27 (90%) patients including 7 patients with adhesions. No direct complications related to pericardial access or adhesions disruption occurred. One periprocedural death occurred from refractory cardiogenic shock in patient with LV ejection fraction of 10%. Another patient developed asymptomatic positive Haemophilus influenzae pericardial fluid cultures identified at second procedure, which was successfully treated. Conclusions: Repeat access can be obtained after prior epicardial ablation. Adhesions from prior procedures may limit mapping, but can usually be disrupted mechanically and allow for ablation of recurrent VT. IPTA may not completely prevent adhesions. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 23, pp. 744‐749, July 2012)     

Nonsurgical transthoracic epicardial catheter ablation to treat recurrent ventricular tachycardia occurring late after myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate feasibility, safety and results of transthoracic epicardial catheter ablation in patients with ventricular tachycardia occurring late after an inferior wall myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND: Transthoracic epicardial catheter ablation effectively controls recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with Chagas' disease in whom epicardial circuits predominate. Epicardial circuits also occur in postinfarction VT. METHODS: Fourteen consecutive patients aged 53.6 +/- 14.5 years with postinfarction VT related to the inferior wall were studied. The VT cycle length was 412 +/- 51 ms. Two patients had previously undergone unsuccessful standard endocardial radiofrequency energy (RF) ablation. The VT was incessant in one patient. Left ventricular angiography showed inferior akinesia in 13 patients and an inferior aneurysm in 1 patient. Ablation was performed with a regular steerable catheter placed into the pericardial sac by pericardial puncture. RESULTS: The pericardial space was reached in all patients. Electrophysiologic evidence of an epicardial circuit was present in 7 of 30 VTs. Due to a high stimulation threshold, empirical thermal mapping was the only criterion used to select the site for ablation. Three VTs were interrupted during the first RF pulse. Two pulses were necessary to render it noninducible in 3 patients (1 VT per patient). In the remaining 4 VTs, 3, 3, 4 and 5 RF pulses, respectively, were used. The overall success was 37.14% (95% confidence interval, 11.83% to 62.45%). Patients are asymptomatic for 14 +/- 2 months. CONCLUSIONS: Postinfarction pericardial adherence does not preclude epicardial mapping and ablation to control VT related to an epicardial circuit in postinferior wall myocardial infarction.     

Feasibility of the transseptal approach for fast and unstable left ventricular tachycardia mapping and ablation with a non-contact mapping system

Background Radiofrequency ablation of fast and unstable left ventricular tachycardia (VT) usually requires non-contact mapping. The procedure is usually performed by a retrograde-transaortic route, requiring a double femoral artery puncture, for the 9F multielectrode catheter and the 7F ablation catheter which are advanced through the aorta and aortic valve into the left ventricle (LV). Reported limitations of the procedure are due to the stiffness of the balloon catheter, particularly in patients with tortuous peripheral arteries, atherosclerotic aorta, or with aortic stenosis. The aim of our study was to test the feasibility and assess the safety of a transseptal approach for left VT non-contact mapping and ablation.Materials and methods Ten patients with multiple cardiac defibrillator shocks because of fast and unstable VT were selected for non-contact mapping and ablation. After a double transseptal puncture the multielectrode catheter (Ensite Array™, St. Jude Medical) was advanced through a standard 10F introducer to a stable position in the LV apex over a 260 cm length 0.035 J-tip guidewire. The ablation catheter (Celsius™ Thermo-cool, Biosense Webster) was then inserted through the second 8F introducer. Twenty-five monomorphic sustained ventricular tachycardia were induced and ablated at the level of the diastolic pathway or exit point revealed by unipolar isopotential mapping. The total procedural and fluoroscopy times were 209 ± 32 min and 28.5 ± 9.27 min, respectively, which were comparable to those described with the traditional retrograde-transaortic approach. No major complication related with the transseptal approach were reported.Conclusion A transseptal approach can be a feasible and effective alternative approach for mapping and ablation of fast and unstable left VT with a non-contact mapping system.