Combination of antiangiogenic therapy with other anticancer therapies: results, challenges, and open questions.

Angiogenesis is necessary for tumor growth. Drug discovery efforts have identified several potential therapeutic targets on endothelial cells and selective inhibitors capable of slowing tumor growth or producing tumor regression by blocking angiogenesis in in vivo tumor models. Certain antiangiogenic therapeutics increase the activity of cytotoxic anticancer treatments in preclinical models. More than 75 antiangiogenic compounds have entered clinical trials. Most of the early clinical testing was conducted in patients with advanced disease resistant to standard therapies. Several phase III trials have been undertaken to compare the efficacy of standard chemotherapy versus the same in combination with an experimental angiogenesis inhibitor. Preliminary results of the clinical studies suggest that single-agent antiangiogenic therapy is poorly active in advanced tumors. Although some of the results of combination trials are controversial, recent positive outcomes with an antivascular endothelial growth factor antibody combined with chemotherapy as front-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer have renewed enthusiasm for this therapeutic strategy. This article presents an overview of experimental and clinical studies of combined therapy with antiangiogenic agents and highlights the challenges related to the appropriate strategies for selection of the patients, study design, and choice of proper end points for preclinical and clinical studies using these agents.     

Angiogenesis as a target for cancer therapy

Antiangiogenic drugs are unique for having highly specific targets while carrying the potential to be effective against a wide variety of tumors. Moreover, some of the major limitations of cytotoxic therapies likely will be avoided by this entirely new class of anticancer weapons. After the realization of the potential advantages of antiangiogenic therapy, the field of angiogenesis research is growing exponentially. Still, there is much to learn about the machinery that tumors use to recruit new blood vessels, and the results of the clinical trials will show the best way to apply that knowledge for cancer therapy.     

A systems approach to cancer therapy

Conclusion The molecules described herein as antiangiogenic agents and antimetastatic agents represent a wide variety of molecular structures with a wide variety of biological effects and targets. Most often these agents have been generally classified as antiangiogenic or antimetastatic by their effects in an in vitro bio-assay system. The diversity in this group of molecules gives strength to the potential of this approach in therapeutic applications. The biological and biochemical pathways involved in angiogenesis are numerous and redundant. It is likely that there are many angiogenic factors and many pathways of invasion, therefore it is likely that blockade of more than one pathway related to angiogenesis and/or invasion will be necessary to impact on the natural progress of a malignant disease.The vasculature forms the first barrier to penetration of molecules into tumors. Although the antiangiogenic agent treatments administered in this study did not inhibit angiogenesis in these tumors completely, the vasculature present in the treated tumors may be impaired compared to control tumors. Overall, therefore, the best speculation is that the main targets for the antiangiogenic agents are extracellular matrix processes and/or tumor endothelial cells and that inhibition and/or impairment of these non-malignant functions can improve therapeutic responses when used in combination with cytotoxic therapies. The incorporation of antiangiogenic agents and/or antimetastatic agents into therapeutic regimens represents an important challenge. The successful treatment of cancer requires the eradication of all malignant cells and therefore treatment with cytotoxic therapies. The compatibility of antiangiogenic therapy and/or anti-invasion agents with cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents is not obvious [316].The goal of the addition of any non-cytotoxic potentiator to a therapeutic regimen is to take a good therapy and, without additional toxicity, push it to cure.Cyclophosphamide is a good drug against the Lewis lung carcinoma although no long-term survivors of animals bearing Lewis lung carcinoma are achieved with cyclophosphamide treatment alone. Adding antiangiogenic agents to treatment of this tumor with cyclophosphamide produced a cure rate of 40–50%, meaning that both the primary and metastatic disease has been eradicated in these animals. Cures were achieved only when the antiangiogenic treatments extended from days 4–18 post Lewis lung tumor implantation. The results obtained with the addition of antiangiogenic agents to cytotoxic anticancer therapies in in vivo models of established solid tumors have been very positive and provide direction for future clinical trials including these antiangiogenic agents. Two conclusions may be drawn. First, combinations of antiangiogenic and/or antimetastatic agents evoke a greater effect on tumor response to therapy than does treatment with single agents of these classes. Second, treatment with antiangiogenic agents and/or antimetastatic agents can interact in a positive way with cytotoxic therapies.     

Advances in understanding angiogenesis through molecular studies

Tumors, in most cases, need angiogenesis for their sustained growth. A great deal of evidence has suggested that the process of angiogenesis is regulated by the balance between proangiogenic and antiangiogenic factors. Thus, the inhibition of tumor angiogenesis has been considered to be one of the key targets in anticancer therapy, and more than 60 antiangiogenic compounds are currently under clinical evaluation in cancer patients. However, the molecular mechanisms responsible for the activity of many of these antiangiogenic compounds are still not well understood. The recent development of microarray technology has allowed us to investigate the mechanism of action of these inhibitors more rapidly and extensively. With the use of microarray technology, novel molecules and pathways are shown to play a role in angiogenesis. This article also reviews new experimental approaches combined with microarray analysis to identify the molecular pathways involved in tumor-host interactions. Elucidation of the pathways that mediate both angiogenic and antiangiogenic responses will help us to develop better anticancer therapies.     

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in the era of personalized medicine

Purpose

To review key clinical issues underlying the assessment of in vivo efficacy when using antiangiogenic therapies for cancer treatment.

Methods

Literature relevant to use of antiangiogenic therapies in cancer was reviewed, with particular emphasis on the assessment of in vivo efficacy of these agents, as well as additional angiogenic factors that could play a role in escape from angiogenesis inhibition.

Results

In order to grow and metastasize, tumors need to continually acquire new blood supplies; therefore, therapeutic inhibition of angiogenesis has become a component of anticancer treatment for many tumor types. Bevacizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody directed at vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), has shown activity in combination with chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Nevertheless, the use of antiangiogenic therapies remains suboptimal; specifically, optimal dose, duration of therapy, and combination of agents remain unknown. Also, at present, it is not possible to determine which patients are most likely to respond to a given form of antiangiogenic therapy. There has been increased recognition of alternative pathways possibly associated with disease progression in patients undergoing antiangiogenic therapy targeted at VEGF-A. Multiligand-targeted antiangiogenic therapies, such as ziv-aflibercept (formerly known as aflibercept, VEGF Trap), are currently undergoing clinical evaluation. Ziv-aflibercept forms monomeric complexes with VEGF-A, VEGF-B, and PlGF, which have a long half-life, allowing optimization of ziv-aflibercept doses and angiogenic blockage.

Conclusions

Although antiangiogenic therapies have increased treatment options for cancer patients, their use is limited by a lack of established and standardized methodology to evaluate their efficacy in vivo. Circulating endothelial cells, hypertension, and several molecular and imaging-based markers have potential for use as biomarkers in these patients and may better define appropriate patient populations.     

Inhibition of angiogenesis and invasion in malignant gliomas

Malignant gliomas confer a dismal prognosis. As the molecular events that underlie tumor angiogenesis are elucidated, angiogenesis inhibition is emerging as a promising therapy for recurrent and newly diagnosed tumors. Data from animal studies suggest that angiogenesis inhibition may promote an invasive phenotype in tumor cells. This may represent an important mechanism of resistance to antiangiogenic therapies. Recent studies have begun to clarify the mechanisms by which glioma cells detach from the tumor mass, remodel the extracellular matrix and infiltrate normal brain. An array of potential therapeutic targets exists. Combination therapy with antiangiogenic and novel anti-invasion agents is a promising approach that may produce a synergistic antitumor effect and a survival benefit for patients with these devastating tumors.     

Inhibition of angiogenesis and invasion in malignant gliomas

Malignant gliomas confer a dismal prognosis. As the molecular events that underlie tumor angiogenesis are elucidated, angiogenesis inhibition is emerging as a promising therapy for recurrent and newly diagnosed tumors. Data from animal studies suggest that angiogenesis inhibition may promote an invasive phenotype in tumor cells. This may represent an important mechanism of resistance to antiangiogenic therapies. Recent studies have begun to clarify the mechanisms by which glioma cells detach from the tumor mass, remodel the extracellular matrix and infiltrate normal brain. An array of potential therapeutic targets exists. Combination therapy with antiangiogenic and novel anti-invasion agents is a promising approach that may produce a synergistic antitumor effect and a survival benefit for patients with these devastating tumors.     

Development of antiangiogenic agents for ovarian cancer

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains a major source of cancer morbidity and mortality, despite advances in surgical and chemotherapeutic management. The molecular pathways that control angiogenesis have been demonstrated to be key to the pathogenesis of EOC, and have been shown to have prognostic significance. Increased understanding of the pathways and molecules involved in angiogenesis has allowed the identification of a number of targets for antiangiogenic therapies and the development of a variety of antiangiogenic drugs. There is now significant preclinical evidence, and a growing body of clinical data, demonstrating promising results with antiangiogenic drugs in the treatment of EOC. Single-agent VEGF inhibitor response rates in pretreated patients of between 15 and 20% have been reported, with much higher response rates when used in combination with chemotherapeutic agents. These benefits, however, must be balanced with the toxicities associated with these drugs, particularly the more serious ones, such as gastrointestinal perforation. The results of ongoing and future randomized clinical trials will confirm if, and how, antiangiogenic therapies should be integrated into the routine management of EOC. However, critical issues, such as the relative importance of combination remission induction regimens and maintenance therapy, remain poorly defined.     

Antiangiogenic therapy for ovarian cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To highlight the current antiangiogenic compounds being evaluated as single agents or in association with chemotherapy in the treatment of ovarian cancer, as well as the rationale for their development. RECENT FINDINGS: Several proangiogenic factors may be potential targets for antiangiogenic therapy in ovarian cancer. Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor, has been evaluated as a single agent in two phase II clinical trials and in combination with chemotherapy in three phase II studies, with promising results. This agent is also being evaluated in association with chemotherapy in two phase III clinical trials, both in the treatment and in the maintenance settings. Heparanase inhibitors and inhibitors of platelet-derived growth factor signalling remain as potential agents to be investigated in phase II trials. The development of biomarkers to define appropriate dosing regimens and predict which patients may benefit from antiangiogenic therapies is of great importance. SUMMARY: Data from preclinical and clinical studies reported in the last 2 years demonstrate the importance of several proangiogenic factors in the prognosis of ovarian cancer, suggesting possible new targets for antiangiogenic therapy. The agents that are currently being investigated in phase II and III clinical trials include bevacizumab, erlotinib, sunitinib, sorafenib and vascular endothelial growth factor Trap, and the results of these trials will have significant implications in the future management of ovarian cancer.     

Antiangiogenic therapy for cancer: an update

The identification and characterization of several important regulators of angiogenesis, which led to Food and Drug Administration approval of the first antiangiogenic drugs, has opened a new era in cancer therapy. This article focuses on the clinical progress in targeting one of the major regulators of angiogenesis, vascular endothelial growth factor-A and also discusses some recent advances in the elucidation of potential cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying refractoriness or resistance to antiangiogenic therapies.     

Dopamine is a safe antiangiogenic drug which can also prevent 5‐fluorouracil induced neutropenia

The role of vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) in tumor angiogenesis is well established and accordingly, molecules targeting VEGFA or its receptors are being presently used in the clinics for treatment of several types of cancer. However, these antiangiogenic agents are expensive and have serious side effects. Thus identification of newer drugs with manageable systemic side effects or toxicities is of immense clinical importance. Since we have reported earlier that dopamine (DA) inhibits VEGFA induced angiogenesis in experimental tumor models, we therefore sought to investigate whether DA treatment results in similar toxicities like other antiangiogenic agents. Our results indicated that unlike sunitinib, another commonly used antiangiogenic agent in the clinics which targets VEGF receptors, DA [50 mg/kg/days × 7days intraperitoneally (i.p.)] not only could inhibit tumor angiogenesis and growth of HT29 human colon cancer and LLC (Lewis lung carcinoma) in mice, it also did not cause hypertension, hematological, renal and hepatic toxicities in normal, HT29 and LLC tumor bearing animals. Furthermore and interestingly, in contrast to the currently used antiangiogenic agents, DA also prevented 5‐fluorouracil (5FU) induced neutropenia in HT29 colon cancer bearing mice. This action of DA was through inhibition of 5FU mediated suppression of colony forming unit‐granulocyte macrophage colony forming units in the bone marrow. Thus our results indicate that DA may be safely used as an antiangiogenic drug for the treatment of malignant tumors.     

Importance of fibroblast growth factor receptor in neovascularization and tumor escape from antiangiogenic therapy

Therapeutic inhibition of pathways involved in angiogenesis has become the standard of care in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Most currently available antiangiogenic agents inhibit the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway. Although these drugs have produced exciting benefits, some tumors do not respond to these agents. In addition most if not all tumors that initially respond will eventually develop resistance. Tumor escape from antiangiogenic therapy may include various signaling pathways that are involved in angiogenesis, including the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling pathway. Emerging preclinical data suggest that FGF and VEGF act distinctly and synergistically to promote tumor vascularization. The current review discusses the role of FGF signaling in resistance to anti-VEGF therapies and outlines potential therapeutic implications.     

Angiogenesis and antiangiogenic approaches to sarcomas.

Established chemotherapy regimens for advanced or metastatic sarcoma generally have low response rates and substantial toxicity, and resistance often arises quickly, making sarcoma an ideal target for alternative treatment approaches. Antiangiogenic therapies have a number of potential advantages including decreased resistance, fewer side effects, and a broad spectrum of activity. This paper reviews the evidence supporting the use of antiangiogenic therapies for adult soft tissue sarcomas. Human sarcomas express a number of proangiogenic factors that may represent therapeutic targets, with vascular endothelial growth factor being the best characterized, and inhibitors of angiogenesis have antitumor activity in animal models of human sarcomas. Clinical trials are in early stages, although promising results have already been seen. In the future, improved drugs, refined molecular profiling of tumors, and new ways of combining antiangiogenic agents with cytotoxic agents may lead to more effective and tolerable therapies for sarcomas.     

Targeting angiogenesis in bladder cancer

In most cases, death from bladder cancer results from metastatic disease. Understanding the closely linked mechanisms of invasion, metastasis, and angiogenesis in bladder cancer has allowed development of new therapeutic strategies that may lead to improvements in patient survival. Vascular endothelial growth factor levels appear to be prognostic for outcomes in advanced bladder cancer, and preclinical evaluation of angiogenesis inhibition demonstrates anticancer activity. Antiangiogenic agents such as sunitinib, sorafenib, and bevacizumab are being tested in advanced bladder cancer. This review highlights the key developments in antiangiogenic therapy as it relates to bladder cancer treatment.     

Emerging toxicities in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: Ocular disorders

The treatment of advanced disease (stage IIIb and IV) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is based on systemic treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy or biological compounds depending on the disease molecular profile. In the last few years, intensive investigational efforts in anticancer therapy have led to the registration of new active chemotherapeutic agents, combination regimens, and biological drugs, expanding choices for customizing individual treatment. However, the introduction of new drugs in the clinical setting has led to several new toxicities, creating some difficulties in daily management. Among these, ocular toxicity is generally overlooked as more common toxicities such as myelosuppression, stomatitis, diarrhea, vomiting, “hand–foot syndrome”, and neurological alterations attract greater attention. Ophthalmic complications from cytotoxic chemotherapeutics are rare, transient, and of mild/moderate intensity but irreversible acute disorders are possible. The best way to prevent potential irreversible visual complications is an awareness of the potential for ocular toxicity because dose reductions or early drug cessation can prevent serious ocular complications in the majority of cases. However, given the novelty of many therapeutic agents and the complexity of ocular pathology, oncologists may be unfamiliar with these adverse effects of anticancer therapy. Although toxicities from chemotherapy are generally intense but short lasting, toxicities related to targeted drugs are often milder but longer lasting and can persist throughout treatment. Here we review the principal clinical presentations of ocular toxicity arising from chemotherapy [1], [2] and [3], target therapies [4], and newly developed drugs and provide some recommendations for monitoring and management of ocular toxicity.     

Antiangiogenic agents for the treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer: characterizing the molecular basis for serious adverse events

Novel agents to reduce angiogenesis by targeting vascular endothelial growth factor and other proangiogenic signaling pathways are being developed for advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer. Antibody-based therapies (e.g., aflibercept) and multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (e.g., sorafenib, sunitinib, and BIBF 1120) are being evaluated in phase III clinical trials. Some antiangiogenic agents have demonstrated distinct profiles in producing a variety of nonhematologic toxicities, including bleeding/hemorrhage, venous and arterial thromboembolic events, gastrointestinal perforation, hypertension, and proteinuria. Elucidating the molecular basis of these toxicities may lead to clinical benefits by improving patient selection and allowing for the development of effective prevention and management strategies.     

Challenges facing antiangiogenic therapy for cancer: impact of the tumor extracellular environment

It is well known that angiogenesis plays an important role in malignant tumor progression. Thus, a great deal of effort has been focused on the development and evaluation of novel angiogenesis inhibitors for the treatment of human malignancies. In this review, the role of angiogenesis in tumor growth will be examined, as well as efforts to develop and use antiangiogenic therapies to treat malignant tumors. In particular, focus will be on the extracellular environment and the challenges of using antiangiogenic therapy in the clinical setting, in terms of toxicities, potential mechanisms of tumor resistance and optimization of clinical trial design. Attention will be focused upon a mechanistic understanding of the variability and dynamic nature of individual tumor microenvironments, and the potential impact this has on antiangiogenic therapies.     

Antiangiogenic Chemotherapeutic Agents

The mechanism of action of anticancer chemotherapeutic agents is mainly thought to be due to a direct inhibition of tumor cell proliferation. The enhanced endothelial cell proliferation rate in tumor specimens raised the question whether therapeutic effects of chemotherapeutic agents might be at least partially attributed to an inhibition of tumor angiogenesis. Meanwhile, numerous anticancer chemotherapeutic agents were tested for their antiangiogenic potential. A few agents seem to exert consistent inhibition of tumor angiogenesis even in drug-resistant tumors. Most recent investigations on the antiangiogenic efficacy of different application schedules suggested the use of a tightly spaced, continuous application of appropriate anticancer chemotherapeutic agents. These application schedules are able to exert a strong antiangiogenic effect as indicated by an increase of apoptosis of tumor endothelial cells. Future clinical trials have to determine the therapeutic benefit of novel combination chemotherapy and alternative application schedules.     

Antiangiogenic Therapies in Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Angiogenesis, which is crucial for the growth and spread of cancer cells, has become an important target for antineoplastic therapies in a variety of malignant tumors. Vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor promote formation of new blood vessels in tumors. Several drugs, most notably the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab, have been developed to inhibit this process. Clinical trials utilizing bevacizumab and other antiangiogenic drugs in metastatic breast cancer have demonstrated enhanced response rates and prolonged progression-free survival, though no overall survival benefit has been seen. Trials are now under way exploring the use of antiangiogenic agents in patients with early stage breast cancer. We performed a comprehensive review of the published literature (English language), US National Institutes of Health clinical trials registry (ClinicalTrials.gov), and established cooperative groups that revealed approximately 75 clinical trials, completed or ongoing, utilizing antiangiogenic drugs in early-stage breast cancer. A number of phase II trials in the neoadjuvant setting have reported preliminary results suggesting response rates similar to those seen with traditional anthracycline-plus-taxane combination regimens. Most of these early trials have not yet met any survival endpoints. Studies are also ongoing in the adjuvant setting, and these have not yet been reported. The toxicities associated with these agents are similar to those that have been reported in the metastatic trials. Most of these side effects are grade 1 or 2 and are easily manageable; however, there remain a small percentage of patients who sustain life-threatening vascular events, bleeding, or wound-healing complications. This number is significantly higher in patients receiving antiangiogenic drugs when compared with controls. While we eagerly await completion and results of this impressive portfolio of studies in early breast cancer with antiangiogenic agents, there is an urgent need for a more rational patient/antiangiogenic therapy selection with greater insight into predictive factors for toxicities, therapy efficacy, and clinical benefit.