Electrophysiologic Spectrum of Atrioventricular Nodal Behavior in Patients with Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Undergoing Selective Fast or Slow Pathway Ablation

AV Nodal Behavior After Ablation. Introduction; The objective of this report is to delineate the atrioventricular (AV) nodal electrophysiologic behavior in patients undergoing fast or slow pathway ablation for control of their AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT).
Methods and Results: One hundred sixteen consecutive patients with symptomatic AVNRT were included. Twenty-two patients underwent fast pathway ablation with complete abolition of AVNRT in all and development of complete AV block in five patients. Of 17 patients with intact AV conduction postablation, 12 had demonstrated antegrade dual pathway physiology during baseline study, which was maintained in three and lost in nine patients postablation. Two patients with successful fast pathway ablation developed uncommon AVNRT necessitating a slow pathway ablation. Twenty-one patients demonstrated both common and uncommon forms of AV nodal reentry during baseline study. The earliest site of atrial activation was close to the His-bundle recording site (anterior interatrial septum) during common variety and the coronary sinus ostium (posterior interatrial septum) during the uncommon AV nodal reentry in all 21 patients. Ninety-six patients underwent successful slow pathway ablation. Among these, the antegrade dual pathway physiology demonstrable during baseline study (60 patients) was maintained in 25 and lost in 35 patients postablation.
Conclusion: These data suggest that: (1) dual pathway physiology may persist after successful ablation, which might be a reflection of multiple reentrant pathways in patients with AVNRT: and (2) the retrograde pathways during common and uncommon AVNRT have anatomically separate atrial breakthroughs. These findings have important electrophysiologic implications regarding the prevailing concept of the AV nodal physiology in patients with AVNRT.     

Atypical Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry Tachycardia with Atrioventricular Block Mimicking Atrial Tachycardia:

AVNRT Mimicking Atrial Tachycardia, Introduction : Fast-intermediate form AV nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) sometimes may mimic atrial tachycardia or atrial flutter and render the diagnosis difficult when the tachycardia rate is fast and AV block occurs during tachycardia.
Methods and Results : A 45-year-old woman with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia was referred to this institution. Initially, the tachycardia was thought to be an atrial tachycardia because of: (1) a short cycle length of the tachycardia with 2:1 and Wenckebach AV block; (2) a difference in the atrial activation sequence during tachycardia and during ventricular pacing; and (3) failure of burst ventricular pacing to affect the atrial rate and the atrial activation sequence during tachycardia. An accurate diagnosis of fast-intermediate form AVNRT was subsequently made based on the finding that the tachycardia was induced following delivery of a third ventricular extrastimulus, which showed a sequence of V-A-H and a change on atrial activation sequence of the induced beat. Successful radiofrequency ablation was achieved only after accurate diagnosis of the tachycardia was made.
Conclusion : Fast-intermediate form AVNRT sometimes may masquerade as atrial tachycardia. Accurate diagnosis is mandatory for successful ablation therapy.     

射频消融慢径后心动过速复发与房室结电生理特性变化的关系

为揭示房室结折返性心动过速（ＡＶＮＲＴ）复发的机制，对４５例射频消融治疗成功的慢－快型ＡＶＮＲＴ患者在消融术前、术后即刻及术后逾三个月行电生理检查。结果１０例复发（复发组）。复发组术前心房早搏刺激时的最大心房－Ｈｉｓ束间期（Ａ２Ｈ２ｍａｘ）较非复发组明显延长（４１３±６０ｍｓｖｓ３１１±１１０ｍｓ，Ｐ＜０．０１）；两组术后即刻Ａ２Ｈ２ｍａｘ较术前均明显缩短（Ｐ均＜０．０１）；术后三个月复发组的Ａ２Ｈ２ｍａｘ较术后即刻明显延长（３５６±９３ｍｓｖｓ２９８±９６ｍｓ，Ｐ＜０．０５），非复发组则有进一步缩短趋势，两组术后三个月的Ａ２Ｈ２ｍａｘ比较有显著性差异（３５６±９３ｍｓｖｓ２２２±７３ｍｓ，Ｐ＜０．００５）；非复发组术后三个月Ａ２Ｈ２ｍａｘ较术前明显缩短（２２２±７３ｍｓｖｓ３１１±１１０ｍｓ，Ｐ＜０．０１），房室结前传文氏周期及有效不应期较术前明显延长（４０５±９１ｍｓｖｓ３６６±８４ｍｓ，３３２±７５ｍｓｖｓ２６９±６３ｍｓ，Ｐ＜０．０１及＜０．０００１），复发组消融术前后比较差异则无显著性。结果提示部分ＡＶＮＲＴ复发可能与其房室结本身电生理特性有关，基础状态下Ａ２Ｈ２ｍａｘ长的患者心动过速更易复发。     

Temperature and Impedance Monitoring During Slow Pathway Ablation in Patients with AV Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Slow Pathway Ablation. Introduction : Successful radiofrequency ablation of an accessory pathway has been demonstrated to be associated with an electrode-tissue interface temperature of approximately 60°C or an impedance change of −5 to −10 Ω. However, the temperature and impedance changes associated with ablation of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) using the slow pathway approach have not been reported. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to define the temperature and impedance changes achieved during ablation of AVNRT.
Methods and Results : The study included 35 consecutive patients with AVNRT undergoing radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway with a fixed power output of 32 W, and using a catheter with a thermistor bead embedded in the distal 4-mm electrode. The procedure was successful in each patient. The steady-state electrode-tissue interface temperature during successful applications of energy was 48.5 ± 3.3°C (range 42° to 56°C), and the steady-state temperature during ineffective applications was 46.8°± 5.5°C (P = 0.03). The mean impedance change during all applications of energy was −1.4 ± 2.8 ω, and did not differ significantly during effective and ineffective applications. Coagulum formation resulted during five applications (2.7%) in two patients (5.7%). There were no recurrences during 114 ± 21 days of follow-up.
Conclusions : Successful ablation of AVNRT using fixed power output is achieved at an electrode-tissue interface temperature of approximately 48°C and is associated with a drop in impedance of 1 to 2 ω. These findings suggest that slow pathway ablation requires less heating at the electrode-tissue interface than does accessory pathway or AV junction ablation.     

Electrophysiologic Characteristics and Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Atrioventricular Node Reentrant Tachycardia with Second-Degree Atrioventricular Block

Second-Degree AV Block During AVNRT. Introduction : Detailed electrophysiologic study of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with 2:1 AV block has been limited.
Methods and Results : Six hundred nine consecutive patients with AVNRT underwent electrophysiologic study and radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow pathway. Twenty-six patients with 2:1 AV block during AVNRT were designated as group I, und those without this particular finding were designated as group II. The major findings of the present study were: (1) group I patients had better anterograde and retrograde AV nodal function, shorter tachycardia cycle length (during tachycardia with 1:1 conduction) (307 ± 30 vs 360 ± 58 msec, P < 0.001), and higher incidence of transient bundle branch block during tachycardia (18/26 vs 43/609, P < 0.001) than group II patients: (2) 21 (80.8%) group I patients had alternans of AA intervals during AVNRT with 2:1 AV block. Longer AH intervals (264 ± 26 vs 253 ± 27 msec, P = 0.031) were associated with the blocked beats. However, similar HA intervals (51 ± 12 vs 50 ± 12 msec, P = 0.363) and similar HV intervals (53 ± 11 vs 52 ± 12, P = 0.834) were found in the blocked and conducted beats; (3) ventricular extrastimulation before or during the His-bundle refractory period bundle could convert 2:1 AV block to 1:1 AV conduction.
Conclusions : Fast reentrant circuit, rather than underlying impaired conduction of the distal AV node or infranodal area, might account for second-degree AV block during AVNRT. Slow pathway ablation is safe and effective in patients who have AVNRT with 2:1 AV block.     

The Electrophysiologic Characteristics in Patients with Only Ventricular-Pacing Inducible Slow–Fast Form Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Background: Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) can be usually induced by atrial pacing or extrastimulation. However, it is less commonly induced only by ventricular pacing or extrastimulation. Objective: The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the electrophysiologic characteristics in patients with slow–fast form AVNRT that could be induced only by ventricular pacing or extrastimulation. Methods: The total population was 1497 patients associated with AVNRT. There were 1373 (91.7%) patients who had slow–fast form AVNRT included in our study. Group 1 (n = 45) could be induced only by ventricular pacing or extrastimulation, and Group 2 (n = 1328) could be induced by only atrial stimulation or both atrial and ventricular stimulation. The electrophysiologic characteristics of the group 1 and group 2 patients were compared. Results: Group 1 patients had a significantly lower incidence of both antegrade and retrograde dual AV nodal pathways. The pacing cycle length (CL) of the antegrade 1:1 fast pathway (FP) and antegrade ERP of the FP were both significantly shorter in Group 1 patients. Mean antegrade FRP of the fast and slow pathways were significantly shorter in Group 1 patients. The differences of pacing CL of 1:1 antegrade conduction, antegrade ERP and FRP were much longer in Group 2 patients. Conclusion: This study demonstrated the patients with slow–fast form AVNRT that could be induced only by ventricular stimulation had a lower incidence of dual AV nodal pathways and the different electrophysiologic characteristics (shorter pacing CL of the antegrade 1:1 FP, antegrade ERP of the FP and the differences of pacing CL of 1:1 antegrade conduction, antegrade ERP and FRP) from the other patients. The specific electrophysiologic characteristics in such patients could be the reason that could be induced only by ventricular stimulation.     

Atrioventricular Node Reentrant Tachycardia in Patients With a Prolonged AH Interval During Sinus Rhythm: Clinical Features, Electrophysiologic Characteristics and Results of Radiofrequency Ablation

Among a consecutive series of 600 patients who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation for AV node reentrant tachycardia, 14 patients (age 29-76 years) had a prolonged AH interval during sinus rhythm (172±18 ms, range 140 to 200). Seven of them had unsuccessful ablation during the previous ablation sessions. Eight patients with anterograde dual AV node pathway physiology received anterograde slow pathway ablation, and the other 6 patients without dual-pathway physiology received retrograde fast pathway ablation. All patients had successful elimination of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia after a mean of 4±4 radiofrequency applications, power level 36±6 watts and a pulse duration of 42±4 seconds. The postablation AH interval remained unchanged. During a follow-up period of 25±13 months, one patient who received slow pathway ablation developed 2:1 AV block with syncope. As compared with the other 586 patients without a prolonged AH interval, these 14 patients had significantly poorer anterograde AV nodal function and lower incidence of anterograde dual AV node physiology (P<0.01). We concluded that slow pathway ablation in patients with dual pathway physiology, and retrograde fast pathway ablation in patients without dual pathway physiology were effective and safe in patients with a prolonged AH interval. However, delayed onset of symptomatic AV block is possible and careful follow-up is necessary.     

Electrophysiologic Characteristics of Different Ectopic Rhythms During Slow Pathway Ablation in Patients with Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

The presence of ectopic rhythm has been considered to be the most important marker for successful slow pathway ablation, but the details of different ectopic rhythms have not been well described. This study included 83 consecutive patients with typical AV node reentrant tachycardia who underwent slow pathway ablation. The interval between the atrial signals of the His bundle electrogram and the distal ablation catheter [A(H)-A(Ab)], and the interval between the atrial components of the distal ablation catheter and the ostium of coronary sinus catheter [A(Ab)-A(CSos)] were measured. One hundred episodes of ectopic rhythm occurred with 81 (81%) successful applications. There are two different origins and three activation sequences of ectopic rhythms, including HIS rhythm (78 applications, the earliest atrial activation in the His bundle electrogram), CSos rhythm (6 applications, the earliest atrial signal in the coronary sinus ostium electrogram) and CSos preceding HIS (CSosHIS) rhythm (16 applications, the atrial activation sequences changing from CSos to HIS rhythm). The CSos rhythm had a shorter mean cycle length (445 ± 81 vs. 511 ± 132 vs. 579 ± 140 ms, p < 0.05), a shorter [A(Ab)-A(CSos)] interval (–2.5 ± 9.8 vs. 14.1 ± 11.2 vs. 12.8 ± 8.4 ms, p < 0.05) and a lower success rate (33% vs. 84% vs. 94% p < 0.05) than HIS rhythm and CSosHIS rhythm. Otherwise, the mean cycle length of ectopic rhythm was significant shorter in successful than in failed ablation (506 ± 135 vs. 559 ± 118 ms, p = 0.04). In conclusion, we found two different origins and three activation sequences of ectopic rhythms. CSos rhythm had a lower success rate in ablation of slow pathway, thus it was a poor marker for successful ablation.     

Radiofrequency Modification for Inducible and Suspected Pediatric Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry Tachycardia

Introduction: AV Node Reentry Tachycardia (AVNRT) is the second most common supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) undergoing pediatric radiofrequency ablation behind accessory pathway reentry tachycardias. AVNRT can be difficult to induce during electrophysiology study (EPS) and dual atrioventricular nodal (AVN) pathways physiology may not be demonstrated in young patients.Purpose: This report is the largest single center long term pediatric experience of radiofrequency modification of slow AVN input fibers for inducible or suspected (non-inducible) AVNRT.Results: One hundred thirty-two patients underwent slow input AVN modification from 1993 to 2002. The mean patient age was 13.7 years (4–20 yrs) with 62M/70F. Outpatient tachycardia was documented by ambulatory monitoring in all patients. AVNRT was induced in 98/132 patients during EPS (group A) with mean SVT cycle length of 324 msec (230–570 msec). Initial AVN modification (group A) was successful in 97/98 patients (99%). During 34/132 EPS, AVNRT was non-inducible; dual AVN physiology was present in 19/34 (group B), and 15/34 did not show evidence for dual AVN physiology (group C). These 34 patients underwent empiric AVN modification following discussion with patients’ families. Freedom of recurrence from SVT at 1 year was 96% for group A (94/98), 89% (17/19) for group B and 93% (14/15) for group C. 1 major and 6 minor complications occurred.Conclusions: AVN modification for AVNRT can be performed safely and effectively in pediatric patients with good long-term results. Empiric slow pathway AVN modification for non-inducible SVT results in a high rate of freedom from recurrence of tachycardia.     

Persistence of Single Echo Beat Inducibility After Selective Ablation of the Slow Pathway in Patients with Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia:

Residual Slow Pathway Conduction Effects on AVN Function. Introduction : Residual slow pathway conduction with or without reentrant echo beats has been reported in 25% to 30% of patients undergoing ablation for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT).
Methods and Results : Fifty-eight consecutive patients (aged 45 ± 12 years) with slow-fast AVNRT underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow AV nodal pathway (SP). Residual slow-fast echo beat was documented in 21 (36%) of 58 patients (group A). The pre-and postablation AH intervals triggering the echo beats were similar (346 ± 8 msec vs 352 ± 6 msec, P = NS), as were the pre-and postablation echo zones (55 ± 6 msec vs 52 ± 5 msec, P = NS) and functional refractory period of the SP. A consistent prolongation of the AV nodal effective refractory period (AVN-ERP; from 265 ± 28 msec to 340 ± 50 msec, P < 0.001) and the Wenckebach cycle length (WBCL; from 298 ± 41 msec to 438 ± 43 msec, P < 0.001) was observed in all patients with abolition of SP conduction (group B). In group A patients, the prolongation of WBCL was less (285 ± 33 msec preablation, and 334 ± 41 msec postablation, P < 0.001). Additional pulses abolished the residual echo in 16 of 21 patients, and further prolongation of the AVN-ERP and WBCL comparable to those found in patients without a residual echo beat was observed. During 19 ± 8 months follow-up, no patient had clinical recurrence of AVNRT.
Conclusion : Residual single echo beat after SP ablation for AVNRT reflects the persistence of some portion of the SP with unchanged functional conduction properties whose prognostic significance is uncertain. A consistent increase of WBCL can be a reliable marker of complete abolition of slow pathway conduction and termination of AVNRT.     

Gender Differences in the Clinical Characteristics and Atrioventricular Nodal Conduction Properties in Patients With Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Gender Differences in Patients With AVNRT. Introduction: The detailed electrophysiological characteristics of the gender differences associated with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) have not been clarified. This study investigated the gender‐related electrophysiological differences in a large series of patients undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation. Methods and Results: A total of 2,088 consecutive AVNRT patients (men/women 869/1,219) who underwent catheter ablation were enrolled in this study. We evaluated the gender differences in their electrophysiological characteristics. Women had a significantly younger age of onset, higher incidence of multiple jumps, shorter AH interval, atrial effective refractory period (ERP), anterograde fast pathway ERP, anterograde slow pathway ERP, and retrograde slow pathway ERP, and longer ventricular ERP than men. The incidence of baseline ventriculoatrial dissociation was lower in women than in men. Women needed less isoproterenol/atropine to induce AVNRT. No gender differences in the radiation exposure time, procedure time, complication rate, acute success rate, or second procedure rate were noted. Both typical and atypical AVNRT were more predominant in women. In the patients with atypical AVNRT, there was no significant gender difference in incidence of baseline ventriculoatrial dissociation; however, the retrograde slow pathway ERP was significantly shorter in women than in men. Women of premenopausal age (≤50 years old) had a significantly higher incidence of anterograde multiple jumps and a retrograde jump phenomenon, and a shorter anterograde slow pathway ERP and retrograde slow pathway ERP than those of women over 50 years old. Conclusion: Gender differences in the anterograde and retrograde AV nodal electrophysiology were noted in the patients with AVNRT. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 1114‐1119)     

Slowing of the Ventricular Rate During Atrial Fibrillation by Ablation of the Slow Pathway of AV Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Influence of Slow Pathway Ablation on Atrial Fibrillation. Introduction : The mechanisms whereby radiofrequency catheter modification of AV nodal conduction slows the ventricular response are not well defined. Whether a successful modification procedure can be achieved by ablating posterior inputs to the AV node or by partial ablation of the compact AV node is unclear. We hypothesized that ablation of the well-defined slow pathway in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia would slow the ventricular response during atrial fibrillation.
Methods and Results : In 34 patients with dual AV physiology and inducible AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, atrial fibrillation was induced at baseline and immediately after successful slow pathway ablation and at 1-week follow-up. The minimal, maximal, and mean RR intervals during atrial fibrillation increased from 353 ± 76,500 ± 121, and 405 ± 91 msec to 429 ± 84 (P < 0.01), 673 ± 161 (P < 0.01), and 535 ± 98 msec (P < 0.01), respectively. These effects remained stable during follow-up at 1 week. The AV block cycle length increased from 343 ± 68 msec to 375 ± 60 msec (P < 0.05) immediately and to 400 ± 56 msec (P < 0.01) at 1-week follow-up. The effective refractory period of the AV node prolonged from 282 ± 83 msec to 312 ± 89 msec and to 318 ± 81 msec after 1 week (P < 0.05), respectively.
Conclusion : This study shows a decrease in ventricular response to pacing-induced atrial fibrillation after ablation of the slow pathway in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. Since the AV nodal conduction properties could be defined, this study supports the hypothesis that the main mechanism of AV nodal modification in chronic atrial fibrillation is caused by ablation of posterior inputs to the AV node.     

Effects of Slow Pathway Ablation on Fast Pathway Function in Patients with Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Effects of Slow Pathway Ablation. Introduction: This study investigated whether fast pathway conduction properties are altered by slow pathway ablation in patients with AV nodal reentrant tacbycardia. Methods and Results: Forty consecutive patients who underwent successful ablation of the slow pathway were prospective subjects for the study. Isoproterenol was used to enhance conduction and to differentiate interactive mechanisms. Potential electrotonic interactions were assessed by comparing patients with and those without residual dual AV node pbysiology after slow pathway ablation. Paired and unpaired t-tests were used when appropriate. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. In the entire study population, heart rates were not significantly different before and after slow pathway ablation (RR = 770 ± 114 msec before and 745 ± 99 msec after, P = 0.07). Anterograde fast pathway conduction properties were unchanged after slow pathway ablation (effective refractory period, 348 ± 84 msec before and 336 ± 86 msec after, P = 0.13; shortest 1:1 conduction, 410 ± 93 msec before and 400 ± 82 msec after, P = 0.39). Retrograde fast pathway characteristics also were similar before and after ablation. Neither anterograde nor retrograde last pathway conduction properties during isoproterenol infusion were changed by slow pathway ablation. When the study population was further divided into patients with (n= 13) or without (n = 27) residual dual AV node pbysiology, no significant change was detected in fast pathway function in either group after slow patbway ablation. Conclusions: Fast pathway conduction characteristics were not affected by slow pathway ablation. In patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, observations suggest that fast and slow pathways are functionally distinct.     

Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Clinical and Electrophysiological Features and Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Following Elimination of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Introduction: Clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) have not been studied in a large patient cohort. We aimed to define the clinical features and cardiac electrophysiological characteristics of these patients, and to examine the incidence and identify predictors of AF recurrences after elimination of AVNRT. Methods and Results: Thirty-six patients with AVNRT and documented paroxysmal AF (Group 1) and 497 patients with AVNRT alone undergoing ablation in the same period (Group 2) were studied. There were no significant differences between groups regarding clinical features, except age, which was higher in Group 1 (p < 0.001). Presence of atrial vulnerability (induction of AF lasting > 30 seconds) and multiple AH jumps (≥50 ms) before ablation were significantly more prevalent in Group 1 (p < 0.001, p = 0.010 respectively). During follow-up of 34 ± 11 months, AF recurred in 10 patients (28%) in Group 1, while 2 patients in Group 2 (0.4%) developed paroxysmal AF (p < 0.001). Univariate predictors of AF were: left atrial diameter > 40 mm (p = 0.001), presence of mitral or aortic calcification (p = 0.003), atrial vulnerability after ablation (p = 0.015) and valvular disease (p = 0.042). However, independent predictors of AF recurrences were left atrial diameter > 40 mm (p = 0.002) and the presence of atrial vulnerability after ablation (p = 0.034). Conclusion: In patients with both AVNRT and paroxysmal AF, the recurrence rate of AF after elimination of AVNRT is 28%. Left atrial diameter greater than 40 mm and atrial vulnerability after elimination of AVNRT are independent predictors of AF recurrences in the long term.     

Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia with Multiple Discontinuities in the Atrioventricular Node Conduction Curve: Immediate Success Rates of Radiofrequency Ablation and Long-Term Clinical Follow-up Results as Compared to Patients with Single or No AH-Jumps

Background: Some patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) demonstrate multiple discontinuities (AH jump) in their antegrade AV node conduction curves. We evaluated and compared the immediate success rates, procedure-related complications, long-term clinical follow-up results and recurrence rates after slow pathway ablation in patients with multiple versus single or no AH jumps. Methods: The study group consists of 278 consecutive patients (mean age 36.6 ± 15.7) who underwent ablation for typical AVNRT, divided into three categories according to the number of AH jumps (50 ms) before ablation: Group-1 consisted of 63 patients (23%) with continuous AV node function curves; Group-2 of 183 patients (66%) with a single jump and Group-3 of 32 (12%) patients showing more than one AH jumps. Results: Age was significantly higher in Group-3 as compared to Group-1 (43 ± 18 years vs. 34 ± 16 years, p = 0.020). The electrophysiological features of AVNRT did not differ among groups. Before ablation, the maximum AH interval was significantly longer in Group-3 as compared to Groups-1 and -2 (p < 0.001 for both). AV node antegrade ERP was significantly shorter in Group-3 than in Group-2, both before and after ablation (p < 0.050 for both). AV node Wenckebach cycle length (WCL) was shorter in Group-3 as compared to both Groups-1 and -2, before and after ablation (p < 0.050 for all). AV node WCL was prolonged significantly in all groups after ablation (p < 0.001 for all). Residual dual pathways were present in 37 of 278 patients (13%) after ablation and were significantly more frequent in Group-3 than Group-2 (31% vs. 15%, p = 0.023). Conclusions: Patients with multiple AH jumps are older and more often have residual dual atrioventricular nodal pathway physiology after successful ablation but these features do not affect the immediate and long-term success rates of slow pathway ablation as compared to patients with single or no AH jumps.     

房室结折返性心动过速慢径消融终点与临床疗效关系探讨

62例慢-快型房室结折返性心动过速（AVNRT）患者接受慢径消融治疗,评价A型终点（阻断慢径且不再诱发AVNRT）、B型终点（保留慢径的传但不再诱发AVNRT和心房回波）和C型终点（保留慢径且能诱发1～3个心房回波）对房室传导功能的影响及与AVNT复发的关系。结果：①消融后77．4％（48例）;17．7％（11例）和4．8％（3例）的病人分别达A、B和C型终点;②消融后A型终点病人的房室传导功能明显改善,B、C型变化不明显;③术后3～7天经食管电生理复查,A型终点AVNRT的再诱发率为2．1％（1例）、B型为18．2％（2例）、C型为33．3％（1例）;④41例病人保持随访8．9±7．1个月,A型终点AVNRT复发率为4．9％,B、C型为28．6％。结果揭示AVNRT慢径消融中大多数病人可达到A型终点,且彻底阻断慢径后房室传导功能明显改善,AVNRT的近期和远期复发率明显低于B到和C型终点。     

Pseudo-Pacemaker Syndrome Following Inadvertent Fast Pathway Ablation for Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Pseudo-Pacemaker Syndrome After AV Nodal Ablation. Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia that is refractory to drug treatment has recently been treated with radiofrequency catheter ablation. In this case report we describe a patient with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in whom radiofrequency ablation of slow pathway was attempted, with inadvertent damage to the fast pathway. The patient developed marked first-degree atrioventricular block associated with symptoms mimicking pacemaker syndrome.     

Optimal Target Site for Slow AV Nodal Pathway Ablation

INTRODUCTION: Although a variety of ablation techniques have been developed in the treatment of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), there have been few reports discussing the location of the optimal target site. Based on our early experiences, we hypothesized that radiofrequency (RF) current applied around the upper margin of the coronary sinus ostium (UCSO) results in the most effective and safe treatment of AVNRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: To confirm our hypothesis, the efficacy of RF currents applied around the UCSO guided by local electrograms in 59 patients (group B: predetermined focal mapping approach) were compared with the outcomes in 60 other patients previously treated with the standard electrogram-guided mapping method starting around the lower margin of the coronary sinus ostium (group A). The precise location of ablation catheters at successful sites (S) was also evaluated. All the patients were successfully treated without complications. Significantly fewer RF pulses and lower energies were needed in group B patients (mean RF applications: 4.3 vs 1.4 applications, mean total energy delivered: 4,699 vs 2,236 J in groups A and B, respectively, P < 0.01). Detailed analyses of the anatomical locations of S using CS venography in group B patients who received only a single RF application (46 patients) revealed that the distance between His and S varied according to the length of Koch's triangle, while that between S and UCSO was relatively constant. In 85 % of these 46 patients, S was located within 5 mm above and below the level of the UCSO. CONCLUSION: RF applications around the UCSO guided by local electrograms yielded excellent outcomes in AVNRT patients with wide varieties in the size of Koch's triangle. The optimal target site was located within 5 mm above and below the level of UCSO along the tricuspid annulus.     

Interruption of the Inferior Extension of the Compact Atrioventricular Node Underlies Successful Radio Frequency Ablation of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

A recent anatomic study has revived interest in the inferior extensions of the compact atrioventricular node in humans. The rightward extension is on the right atrial aspect, close to the septal attachment of the tricuspid valve leaflet and, hence, closely related to the anticipated slow pathway considered to play a role in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). This report documents a patient, 65 years of age, with dilated cardiomyopathy and AVNRT. The tachycardia was successfully terminated using selective radiofrequency (RF) ablation, delivered at a site where a slow potential was recorded and validated by atrial pacing, located between the tricuspid valve and the os of the coronary sinus (CS), close to its superior rim. In subsequent years the patient developed progressive heart failure and eventually died. Histopathologic examination revealed extensive scar tissue at the site of the burn, extending onto the crest of the underlying ventricular septum. Serial sections revealed the compact AV node superiorly and an inferior extension surfacing from the scar which could be traced inferiorly beyond the os of the CS. This is the first documentation of RF ablation interrupting an inferior extension of the compact AV node in a patient successfully ablated for AVNRT. The observation suggests that the slow pathway in this patient found its anatomic substrate in the inferior extension of the compact AV node.     

Single Radiofrequency Application to Cure Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry: Arguments for the Slow Pathway Origin of the High-Low Frequency Slow Potentials

Background: High-low frequency slow potentials are thought to be related to the slow AV pathway conduction. Their use was proposed to guide radiofrequency (RF) ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). The present study was designed to determine the prospective value of these high-low frequency slow potentials to guide AVNRT ablation using a single RF application. Single RF application could indeed reduce the size of the lesion created in the viciny of the specialized AV conduction system and shorten the radiation exposure and the overall duration of the procedure.Results: Forty-one patients (14 men, 27 women, 45&plusmn;16 years old) with AVNRT underwent slow pathway RF ablation guided by high-low frequency slow potentials. High-low frequency slow potentials were found in all patients along the tricuspid annulus and above the coronary sinus. Ablation was always performed in the posterior part of Koch's triangle. The mean A/V amplitude ratio of the successful site was 0.43&plusmn;0.59. In 32 patients (78%) AVNRT was no longer inducible after a single RF application. Procedure and radiation times were 35&plusmn;31 and 13&plusmn;12 min respectively. Five patients required 2, 3 patients 3, and 1 patient 6 RF applications. The mean number of RF applications was 1.4&plusmn;0.9 (median &equals; 1). In the 32 patients who required only one RF application, 24 (75%) had an obvious dual AV nodal pathways with a jump before ablation, wich completely disappeared in 18 of them (75%) after ablation. In the 6 remaining patients, who still had a jump after 1 RF application, there was no significant change in either conduction times or refractory periods concerning both the anterograde and retrograde AV conduction. No patient had PR interval purlongation. After a mean follow up of 11&plusmn;5 months, recurrence was observed in a single patient who received 2 discontinued RF applications.Conclusion: Catheter-mediated ablation of AVNRT using high-low frequency slow potentials to localize the slow AV pathway is feasible and safe. Using this technique, a single RF application was successfull in 78% of patients, and slow pathway characteristics were completely eliminated in 75% of patients. The radiation time and the procedure duration were short. This suggest that, in patients with AVNRT, the choice of an appropriate RF target can reduce procedural duration.