p63alpha and DeltaNp63alpha can induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis and differentially regulate p53 target genes.

The p53 tumor suppressor protein plays a critical role in the regulation of the cell cycle and apoptosis. The importance of p53's functions is underscored by the high incidence of p53 mutations in human cancers. Recently, two p53-related proteins, p73 and p63, were identified as members of the p53 gene family. Multiple isoforms of p73 have been found, including DeltaN variants in which the N-termini are truncated. p63 is expressed as three major forms, p63alpha, p63beta and p63gamma, each of which differ in their C-termini. All three forms can be alternatively transcribed from a cryptic promoter located within intron 3, producing DeltaNp63alpha, DeltaNp63beta and DeltaNp63gamma. The high degree of similarity of p73 and p63 to evolutionarily conserved regions of p53 suggests that these proteins play an important and potentially redundant role in regulating cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Here we describe the characterization of cell lines generated to inducibly express p63alpha and DeltaNp63alpha. We have found that p63alpha and DeltaNp63alpha can differentially regulate endogenous p53 target genes and induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Deletion of the N-terminal 26 amino acids of DeltaNp63alpha abolished its ability to transactivate p53 target genes and induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. This indicates that a putative transactivation domain exists within the N-terminus of the DeltaN variants of p63. Furthermore, the differential regulation of p53 target genes by p63alpha and DeltaNp63alpha suggests that p63 and p53 utilize both similar and different signaling pathways to execute their cellular functions.     

Differential regulation of cellular target genes by p53 devoid of the PXXP motifs with impaired apoptotic activity.

Activation of the p53 tumor suppressor protein can lead to either cell cycle arrest or apoptosis. Several functional domains necessary for mediating cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in p53 have been mapped, e.g., the proline-rich domain. The proline-rich domain is located within residues 60-90, which comprise five PXXP motifs (where P represents proline and X any amino acid). To further delineate the function of the proline-rich domain and its potential role in transactivation, we generated several groups of cell lines that inducibly express various p53 mutants using a tetracycline-regulated expression system. We found that p53(delta62-91), which lacks all five PXXP motifs in human p53, is capable of inducing cell cycle arrest but not apoptosis, while p53(gln22-ser23/delta62-91), which contains a double point mutation in the activation domain as well as deletion of the proline-rich domain, completely loses its activity. However, p53(delta74-91), which contains only one PXXP motif at its N-terminus, is not only capable of inducing cell cycle arrest but also retains a partial apoptotic activity. Furthermore, we found that deletion of the proline-rich region has no or very mild effects on activation of several transiently transfected p53 target gene promoters, i.e., the p21, MDM2, BAX, and GADD45 promoters. However, such deletion differentially affects p53 induction of endogenous target genes, i.e., induction of p21, MDM2, BTG2, p85, PIG3, PIG6 and PIG11 was reduced or abrogated but induction of BAX, KILLER/DR5, PIG2, PIG7 and PIG8 was not substantially affected. Interestingly, induction of GADD45 was enhanced. These results suggest that the proline-rich region may play a role in chromatin remodeling, which counteracts chromatin-mediated repression for some of the endogenous p53 target genes.     

A ribonucleotide reductase gene is a transcriptional target of p53 and p73

Many p53-inducible genes have been identified that might play a role in mediating the various downstream activities of p53. We have identified a close relative of ribonucleotide reductase, recently named p53R2, as a p53-inducible gene, and show that this gene is activated by several stress signals that activate a p53 response, including DNA damaging agents and p14(ARF). p53R2 expression was induced by p53 mutants that are defective for the activation of apoptosis, but retain cell cycle arrest function, although no induction of p53R2 was seen in response to p21(WAF1/CIP1)-mediated cell cycle arrest. Several isoforms of the p53 family member p73 were also shown to induce p53R2 expression. Transient ectopic expression of either wild type p53R2 or p53R2 targeted to the nucleus, did not significantly alter cell cycle progression in unstressed cells. The identification of this gene as a p53 target supports a direct role for p53 in DNA repair, in addition to inhibition of growth of damaged cells. Oncogene (2000) 19, 4283 - 4289     

p63 and p73 are not required for the development and p53-dependent apoptosis of T cells

The recent discoveries of p63 and p73, homologs of the tumor suppressor p53, raised the possibility of a network of these family members governing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in response to stress. However, mice lacking p73 show no tendency for spontaneous tumors, and mutations in p63 or p73 are rare in human tumors, rendering any obligate role of these genes in cell death and tumor suppression unclear. In an effort to reconcile these incongruent data, we examined the genetic interactions between p53, p63, and p73 in well-established paradigms of p53-dependent and -independent T cell death using primary, genetically defined lymphocytes. Our findings challenge the generality of the notion that p63 and p73 are required for p53 function or for apoptosis in T cells.     

ASPP: a new family of oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes

The apoptosis stimulating proteins of p53 (ASPP) family consists of three members, ASPP1, ASPP2 and iASPP. They bind to proteins that are key players in controlling apoptosis (p53, Bcl-2 and RelA/p65) and cell growth (APCL, PP1). So far, the best-known function of the ASPP family members is their ability to regulate the apoptotic function of p53 and its family members, p63 and p73. Biochemical and genetic evidence has shown that ASPP1 and ASPP2 activate, whereas iASPP inhibits, the apoptotic but not the cell-cycle arrest function of p53. The p53 tumour suppressor gene, one of the most frequently mutated genes in human cancer, is capable of suppressing tumour growth through its ability to induce apoptosis or cell-cycle arrest. Thus, the ASPP family of proteins helps to determine how cells choose to die and may therefore be a novel target for cancer therapy.     

In vivo analyses of UV-irradiation-induced p53 promoter binding using a novel quantitative real-time PCR assay

The p53 tumor suppressor protein mediates cell cycle arrest and apoptosis through transactivation of downstream target genes. While many target genes have been identified to date, the mechanisms and time course of their induction are still unclear. We investigated the kinetics of p53 binding to the p21CIP1, MDM2, BAX and PIG3 promoters in vivo using a novel quantitative real-time chromatin immunoprecipitation-PCR assay. Our results demonstrate distinct kinetics of p53 promoter binding dependent on the target gene promoters. The timed induction of target genes due to genotoxic stress is likely to play a pivotal role for the divergent functions of p53.     

p73 protein expression correlates with radiation-induced apoptosis in the lack of p53 response to radiation therapy for cervical cancer

PURPOSE: p73 belongs to the p53 tumor suppressor family of genes and can inhibit cell growth in a p53-like manner by inducing apoptosis or cell cycle arrest. Here, we investigated whether p73 could compensate for impaired p53 function in apoptosis induced by radiation therapy (RT) for cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixty-eight patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix who received definitive RT combined with (n=37) or without (n=31) cisplatin were investigated. Biopsy specimens were excised from the cervical tumor before RT and after 9 Gy. RESULTS: Mean apoptosis index (AI) was 0.93% before RT and 1.97% after 9 Gy with a significant increase (p<0.001). For all patients, there was a significant correlation between p73 expression positivity after 9 Gy and AI ratio (AI after 9 Gy/AI before RT) (p=0.021). Forty-one patients were regarded as the p53-responding group according to the expression of p53 after 9 Gy, whereas the remaining 27 patients were regarded as the p53-nonresponding group. A significant correlation between p73 expression after 9 Gy and AI ratio was observed in the p53-non-responding group (p<0.001) but not in the p53-responding group (p=0.940). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that p73 plays an important role in compensating for the lack of p53 function in radiation-induced apoptosis of cervical cancer.