Alemtuzumab induction in deceased donor kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: The use of alemtuzumab for induction therapy in kidney transplantation has been increasing. Herein is a report of graft outcomes associated with alemtuzumab induction from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database. METHODS: A total of 14,362 deceased donor kidney transplants from 2003 to 2004 received no induction (n=4,364), antithymocyte globulin (ATG; n=4,930), interleukin-2 receptor antagonists (IL-2RA; n=4,378), or alemtuzumab (n=690). Acute rejection within the initial hospitalization, 6 months, and 1 year; graft survival; and rejection-free survival were examined. Graft and rejection-free survival of alemtuzumab recipients maintained with tacrolimus (FK) or cyclosporine (CSA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and steroids versus no calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), MMF, and steroids were compared. RESULTS: Alemtuzumab recipients had less acute rejection during the initial hospitalization (2.3%) than no induction, ATG, and IL-2RA (7.6%, 3.4%, and 4.8%, respectively; P<0.001). There was increased acute rejection at 6 months and 1 year with alemtuzumab (14.5% and 19.2%) compared to no induction (12.7% and 14.8%, P<0.001), ATG (8.2% and 10.2%, P<0.001), and IL-2RA (11.1% and 13.0%, P<0.001) with no difference in adjusted relative risk for graft loss. Alemtuzumab recipients receiving FK or CSA, MMF, and steroids had increased graft (FK/MMF/steroids, P<0.001, CSA/MMF/steroids, P=0.007) and rejection-free survival (FK/MMF/steroids, P<0.001, CSA/MMF/steroids, P=0.006) over 24 months compared to no CNI, MMF, and steroids. CONCLUSIONS: Despite reduced early rejection, acute rejection rates at 6 months and 1 year with alemtuzumab induction exceeded other forms of induction therapy. Maintenance with CNI-based immunosuppression may improve graft and rejection-free survival compared to CNI-free regimens among alemtuzumab recipients.     

Mycophenolate Mofetil and Sirolimus Combination in Renal Transplantation

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and sirolimus (SRL) are potent non-nephrotoxic xenobiotic immunosuppressants. Their complementary properties may provide the rationale for their combination in induction and maintenance regimens. MMF, a reversible inhibitor of inosin monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) acts as an antiproliferative drug; and SRL, an mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) inhibitor, inhibits cell proliferation driven by growth factors. Early experiences with the use of the SRL, MMF and steroid combination yielded insufficient prophylaxis of acute rejection. However, the introduction of induction therapy with mono- or polyclonal antilymphocyte antibodies to the SRL-MMF and steroid combination brings an efficient acute rejection prophylaxis, while improving renal function and/or reducing of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). However, adverse events related to the use of this drug combination (mainly haematological and surgery-related) result in a high rate of discontinuations in some trials, which may hamper the potential benefits of this calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI)-free strategy. Also, currently under investigation is whether in long-term immunosuppression, in MMF-treated patients, CNIs can be replaced by SRL to avoid and/or halt progression of chronic nephropathy and to improve graft survival. However, some authors reported a high proportion of patients with oral ulcers and proteinuria after switching to SRL. In short, refining the use of MMF and SRL may provide a better risk/benefit ratio to pave the way towards non-nephrotoxic immunosuppression.     

Calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing immunosuppressive protocols

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) have played an important role in improving graft survival. However, the balance between preventing immunologic allograft losses and the management of CNI-related nephrotoxicity is still an issue in renal transplantation. There are three major CNI-sparing strategies. CNI MINIMIZATION: The advent of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) allows cyclosporine (CsA) reduction to ameliorate renal function in patients with chronic renal allograft dysfunction, without increasing acute rejection rates. In combination with mTOR inhibitors, very low CNI levels may be sufficient to prevent acute rejection. However, in this association, CNI nephrotoxicity is magnified by pharmacokinetic interaction. CNI WITHDRAWAL: CNI withdrawal has been attempted in regimens containing MMF or sirolimus (SRL). Introduction of MMF in patients with chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) followed by CNI withdrawal resulted in stabilization or improvement of renal function and hypertension profile, although there is some risk of acute rejection. In regimes based on SRL, CNI withdrawal is a safety strategy, achieving a sustained improvement of renal function, histology, and graft survival. There is not consensus at all whether MMF should be added or not in patients converted from CNI to mTOR inhibitor. CNI AVOIDANCE: Polyclonal-based regimens with MMF and steroids have shown acceptable acute rejection rates, but high rates of cytomegalovirus (CMV) and opportunistic infections. Conversely, anti-IL-2R in combination with MMF and steroids resulted in 50% incidence of acute rejection, thus suggesting that CNI avoidance is not feasible in a regimen based on MMF. Alternatively, a protocol based on anti-IL-2R induction therapy combined with SRL, MMF, and prednisone has shown an efficient prevention of acute rejection, higher creatinine clearance and lower rate of CAN in comparison with a group treated with CNI. New strategies using costimulation blockade may help in the development of safe CNI-free regimens. In summary, in renal transplantation the new immunosuppressive medications have made feasible old aspirations such as minimization, withdrawal, or even avoidance of CNI.     

Calcineurin inhibitor minimization protocols in liver transplantation

Liver transplant recipients are at increasingly high risk for suffering from impaired renal function and probable need of renal replacement therapy. Extended criteria organs and transplantation of patients with higher model for end-stage liver disease scores further increase this problem. Acute and chronic nephrotoxicity are the trade-off in immunosuppression with potent calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). As a good renal function is associated with better graft and patient survival, CNI minimization protocols have been developed. Current strategies to overcome CNI toxicity include reduction or withdrawal of CNIs concurrently with switching over to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)-based regimens. This strategy caused an improvement in renal function in a significant number of liver transplantation patients according to several studies. However, total CNI avoidance seems to result in higher rejection rates. To prevent chronic renal dysfunction in patients prone to or with acute renal failure, CNI delay – with induction therapy for bridging – followed by low-dose CNI in combination with MMF are proven strategies without risking higher rejection rates. An individualized, tailor-made immunosuppressive regime, with a special focus on renal function is recommended. This review gave an overview on CNI minimization protocols in liver transplantation also focusing on recently analyzed studies.     

Calcineurin inhibitor sparing in renal transplantation

Although calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are effective at preventing acute rejection, their long-term use is associated with nephrotoxicity that may compromise long-term renal allograft survival. Consequently, there is considerable interest in identifying immunosuppressive regimens that permit reduced exposure to CNIs while maintaining adequate immunosuppression. Introducing such strategies early after transplantation may mean that the development of CNI-associated nephrotoxicity could be minimized or prevented. Several CNI-sparing regimens have shown at least comparable efficacy with standard-dose CNI regimens. In particular, a regimen of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), corticosteroids, interleukin-2 receptor antagonist induction, and low-dose tacrolimus from the time of transplantation provided superior renal function and a lower acute rejection rate than the same regimen but with low-dose cyclosporine or low-dose sirolimus, or standard-dose cyclosporine, MMF, and corticosteroids. The use of low-dose cyclosporine does not seem to eliminate nephrotoxicity in de novo renal transplant recipients. The early withdrawal of CNIs from MMF-based regimens generally improves renal function but has been associated with an increased risk of acute rejection, in particular when the levels of mycophenolic acid were not adjusted to maintain the same total level of immunosuppression. Research aiming to achieve the "best" balance of efficacy and toxicity of available immunosuppressive regimens continues.     

Long-term effects of calcineurin inhibitor conversion to mycophenolate mofetil on renal function after liver transplantation.

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are the cornerstone of immunosuppression after liver transplantation. However, CNI treatment is frequently associated with chronic renal failure (CRF). The reduction or interruption of CNI may reduce renal failure. We prospectively studied 49 liver recipients treated with CNI (tacrolimus, n = 14; cyclosporine, n = 35) who secondarily developed CNI-associated CRF and for whom mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was introduced to reduce or withdraw CNI. The creatinine clearance (CCl; 42.9 +/- 14 ml/minute) increased significantly after CNI reduction (48.8 +/- 17 ml/minute after 1 year, 49.9 +/- 18 ml/minute after 2 years, and 58.4 +/- 20 ml/minute after 3 years, P < 0.0001). CCl decreased during the 2 years before CNI reduction at a rate of -5.6 +/- 5 ml/minute/year; for the 2 years after CNI reduction, CCl increased significantly by +3.2 +/- 4.3 ml/minute/year (P < 0.0001). Ten patients did not have improved renal function after 1 year, but the rate of decrease in CCl slowed after CNI reduction. Three parameters were identified as risk factors for unresponsiveness to CNI reduction: (1) low CCl at MMF introduction, (2) a high rate of CCl decrease during the 2 years before conversion, and (3) alcoholic cirrhosis. The type of CNI molecule used did not impair the renal response. None of the patients developed acute or chronic graft rejection after the reduction or interruption of CNI. In liver recipients with CRF, a reduction or withdrawal of CNI concomitantly with the introduction of MMF was safe and was associated with an improvement in renal function.     

Calcineurin Inhibitor Minimization,Conversion, Withdrawal,and Avoidance Strategies in Renal Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Despite their clinical efficacy, concerns about calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity make alternative regimens that reduce CNI exposure attractive for renal transplant recipients. In this systematic review and meta‐analysis, we assessed four CNI immunosuppression strategies (minimization, conversion, withdrawal, and avoidance) designed to reduce CNI exposure and assessed the impact of each on patient and allograft survival, acute rejection and renal function. We evaluated 92 comparisons from 88 randomized controlled trials and found moderate‐ to high‐strength evidence suggesting that minimization strategies result in better clinical outcomes compared with standard‐dose regimens; moderate‐strength evidence indicating that conversion to a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor or belatacept was associated with improved renal function but increased rejection risk; and moderate‐ to high‐strength evidence suggesting planned CNI withdrawal could result in improved renal function despite an association with increased rejection risk. The evidence base for avoidance studies was insufficient to draw meaningful conclusions. The applicability of the review is limited by the large number of studies examining cyclosporine‐based strategies and low‐risk populations. Additional research is needed with tacrolimus‐based regimens and higher risk populations. Moreover, research is necessary to clarify the effect of induction and adjunctive agents in alternative immunosuppression strategies and should include more comprehensive and consistent reporting of patient‐centered outcomes.     

A therapeutic exploratory study to determine the efficacy and safety of calcineurin-inhibitor-free de-novo immunosuppression after liver transplantation: CILT

Background  

Immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) increases the risk of renal dysfunction after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Controlled trials have shown improvement of renal function in patients that received delayed and/or reduced-dose CNI after OLT. Delaying immunosuppression with CNI in combination with induction therapy does not increase the risk of acute rejection but reduces the incidence of acute renal dysfunction. Based on this clinical data this study protocol was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of calcineurin-inhibitor-free de-novo immunosuppression after liver transplantation.     

Mycophenolate mofetil in pediatric renal transplantation without induction therapy: results after 12 months of treatment. German Pediatric Renal Transplantation Study Group

BACKGROUND: Acute rejection episodes (ARE) of kidney transplants are considered as risk factor in the development of chronic rejection. In adult renal transplantation (RTx), ARE have been significantly reduced by mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in combination with cyclosporin (CyA) and steroids (Pred). Reports of pediatric RTx on a maintenance immunosuppression with MMF are restricted to patients (P) after antibody induction therapy. METHODS: The efficacy and safety of MMF combined with CyA and Pred in pediatric RTx without induction therapy were evaluated in an open-labeled multicenter study. RESULTS: From 10/1996 to 6/1999, 65 pediatric P (MMF group) were followed for at least 6 months, 58 of 65 for 12 months. These P were compared with 54 retrospectively analyzed pediatric P who were transplanted between 1990 and 1996 and had received CyA, Pred, and azathioprine for immunosuppression (historic AZA group). Within the first 6 months after RTx, 18 of 65 (MMF group) and 32 of 54 (historic AZA group) P showed clinical signs of acute rejection (P<0.01). Thereafter only one further P in the MMF group developed a first ARE. Graft loss due to rejection occurred in one MMF- and seven AZA-treated P (P<0.05). The creatinine-clearance 3 and 6 months after RTx was higher in the MMF group. Major adverse events (MMF group) included infections of the urinary and the upper respiratory tract, diarrhea, and leukopenia. Cytomegalovirus-infection occurred in 13 P and 2 P developed cytomegalovirus disease. One P developed PTLD 10 months after RTx and recovered after the reduction of immunosuppression. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of MMF, CyA, and Pred reduced ARE in pediatric RTx without incurring major side effects.     

Multicenter trial exploring calcineurin inhibitors avoidance in renal transplantation

BACKGROUND: The adoption of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) as the mainstay of immunosuppression has resuited in a significant decrease of acute rejection and improvement of short-term graft survival. However, because of the irreversible nephrotoxicity associated with the chronic use of the CNI, the magnitude of the improvement of long-term graft survival has been more modest. Therefore, an effective immunosuppression regimen that does not rely on CNI may result in improvement of long-term outcome and simplification of the management of transplant recipients. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients of primary cadaver or living donor kidneys at low immunologic risk were enrolled in a CNI avoidance study. The immunosuppression regimen consisted of daclizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to the alpha chain of the interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2Ralpha), administered for a total of five doses at biweekly intervals; 3 gm/day mycophenolate mofetil for the first 6 month and 2 gm thereafter; and conventional corticosteroid therapy. Patients who underwent rejection episodes could be started on CNI. The primary efficacy end-point was biopsy-proven rejection during the first 6 months posttransplant. RESULTS: Biopsy-proven rejection was diagnosed in 48% of patients during the first 6 months after transplantation. The majority of rejection episodes were Banff grade I and IIA and were fully reversed with corticosteroid therapy. The median time to the first biopsy-proven rejection among patients who experienced this event during the first 6 months was 39 days. In 22 patients with delayed graft function, the proportion of patients with biopsy-proven rejection was 50% at 6 months. However in the first 2 weeks posttransplant, only 1 of 22 patients with delayed graft function developed biopsy-proven rejection. At 1 year, patient survival was 97% and graft survival was 96%. Only two grafts were lost secondary to rejection. At 1-year posttransplant, 62% of patients had received CNI for more than 7 days. At 1-year posttransplant, the mean serum creatinine in the nonrejectors with no CNI use was 113 micromol/L (95%, confidence interval [CI], 100.7 to 125.3 micromol/L) and in the rejectors or patients with CNI use (more than 7 days) was 154 micromol/L (95% CI, 135.0 to 173.0 micromol/L). In selected patients with rejection, analysis of circulating and intragraft lymphocytes revealed complete IL-2Ralpha saturation. CONCLUSIONS: This CNI avoidance study in immunologic low-risk patients, while only partially successful in preventing acute rejection, provided benefits to a sizable minority of patients who have not required chronic CNI therapy. However, wide acceptance of a CNI-sparing immunosuppression regimen may require a lower rate of acute rejection, possibly through the addition of a non-nephrotoxic dose of CNI. However, because complete IL-2Ralpha blockade was present during rejection, it can be assumed that alternative pathways, such as IL-15, may be responsible for the rejection; thus, the incorporation of non-nephrotoxic immunosuppressive agents, such as sirolimus, may provide a more strategic approach.     

Immunosuppression with Belatacept‐Based,Corticosteroid‐Avoiding Regimens in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients

Current immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplantation typically include calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and corticosteroids, both of which have toxicities that can impair recipient and allograft health. This 1‐year, randomized, controlled, open‐label, exploratory study assessed two belatacept‐based regimens compared to a tacrolimus (TAC)‐based, steroid‐avoiding regimen. Recipients of living and deceased donor renal allografts were randomized 1:1:1 to receive belatacept‐mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), belatacept‐sirolimus (SRL), or TAC‐MMF. All patients received induction with 4 doses of Thymoglobulin (6 mg/kg maximum) and an associated short course of corticosteroids. Eighty‐nine patients were randomized and transplanted. Acute rejection occurred in 4, 1 and 1 patient in the belatacept‐MMF, belatacept‐SRL and TAC‐MMF groups, respectively, by Month 6; most acute rejection occurred in the first 3 months. More than two‐thirds of patients in the belatacept groups remained on CNI‐ and steroid‐free regimens at 12 months and the calculated glomerular filtration rate was 8–10 mL/min higher with either belatacept regimen than with TAC‐MMF. Overall safety was comparable between groups. In conclusion, primary immunosuppression with belatacept may enable the simultaneous avoidance of both CNIs and corticosteroids in recipients of living and deceased standard criteria donor kidneys, with acceptable rates of acute rejection and improved renal function relative to a TAC‐based regimen.     

Should living-unrelated renal transplant recipients receive antibody induction? Results of a clinical experience trial

BACKGROUND: Living-donor kidney transplant recipients generally do not receive antibody induction. Induction avoidance may not be appropriate, particularly for living-unrelated renal transplant (LURT) recipients, in whom matching may not be optimal. We compared the incidence of acute rejection and graft outcome of LURT recipients who were administered no induction and cadaveric renal transplant (CRT) recipients who were administered anti-CD25 antibody. These groups both had immediate graft function and similar maintenance immunosuppression. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included patients who received kidney transplants between 1999 and 2000. CRT recipients received basiliximab, corticosteroids, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and delayed tacrolimus (serum creatinine <3 mg/dL). LURT recipients received tacrolimus (initiated pretransplantation), MMF, and corticosteroids. RESULTS: The analysis included 136 LURT recipients and 126 CRT recipients. CRT recipients included more African Americans (52.4% vs. 30.9%, P<0.01). LURT recipients included more patients with at least one human leukocyte antigen mismatch (97.8% vs. 85.7%, P<0.01). A higher acute rejection rate was observed in LURT recipients at both 6 months (LURT recipients 19.1% vs. CRT recipients 3.2%, P<0.01) and 1 year (21.3% vs. 4.0%, P<0.0004); a higher rate also was observed in African American LURT recipients compared with African American CRT recipients (35.7% vs. 4.5%, P<0.0015) at 1 year. LURT recipients demonstrated a threefold greater rejection risk than CRT recipients who were administered basiliximab (relative risk: 3.6, P<0.002). Graft survival was similar at 1 year. CONCLUSION: The higher rejection rates in LURT recipients (no induction) compared with CRT recipients (basiliximab induction), despite similar chronic immunosuppression (tacrolimus, MMF, and steroids) and immediate graft function, indicate the potential advantage of anti-CD25 induction in LURT protocols to reduce the risk of acute rejection.     

Simultaneous corticosteroid avoidance and calcineurin inhibitor minimization in renal transplantation

Steroids and calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) have been mainstays of immunosuppression but both have numerous side effects that are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. This study was carried out to determine if steroids can be eliminated with early discontinuation of cyclosporine A (CsA) and later discontinuation of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Ninety-six patients with kidney transplants were entered into four subgroups of two pilot studies. All patients received Thymoglobulin induction, rapamycin (RAPA), and the immunonutrients arginine and an oil containing omega-3 fatty acids. Mycophenolate mofetil was started in standard doses and discontinued by 2 years. CsA was given in reduced doses for either 4, 6, or 12 months. Follow-up was 12-36 months. Thirteen first rejection episodes occurred during the first year (14%). Combining all patients, 86% were rejection-free at 1 year, 80% at 2 years and 79% at 3 years. No kidney has been lost to acute rejection. Ninety percent of the 84 patients at risk at the end of the study were steroid-free and 87% were off CNI. Fifty-seven percent of 54 patients with a functioning kidney at 3 years were receiving monotherapy with RAPA. We conclude that this therapeutic strategy is worthy of a prospective multi-center clinical trial.     

Mycophenolate mofetil (Cellcept) in pediatric renal transplantation

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was introduced in pediatric renal transplantation almost 10 years ago. In several pediatric studies, MMF has been associated with improved graft survival and improved renal function with standard immunosuppression of steroids and calcineurin inhibitors (CNI). Both drugs are associated with significant negative effects including influence on growth, blood pressure, glucose metabolism, and also cosmetic side effects. Reduction of CNI was possible with MMF without increased rejection, improving blood pressure and renal function. Information is accumulating that steroid-sparing protocols including CNI are also associated with clinical improvement. Recent reports are positive in the pediatric population using the combination of induction with interleukin-2-receptor antagonists and mTOR inhibitors to spare steroids and CNI. Therefore MMF remains a mainstay of immunosuppressive protocols in the pediatric renal transplantation.     

Calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal and conversion to mycophenolate mofetil and steroids in cardiac transplant recipients with chronic renal failure: a word of caution

Abstract: Background: Chronic renal failure (CRF) is a common complication of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)‐based immunosuppression following cardiac transplantation (HTx). The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the impact of an immunosuppressive conversion from CNIs to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids in cardiac transplant recipients with CRF on renal and cardiac graft function. Methods: Since 1999, 12 HTx recipients (10 men; 58 ± 3.6 yr of age; 8.7 ± 4.2 yr after HTx) with CNI‐based immunosuppression and a calculated creatinine clearance (CreaCl) <50 mL/min were included. Most patients (10/12) were on cyclosporine and two patients were on tacrolimus prior inclusion. MMF was started with 0.5 g/d and adjusted according to the target trough levels (2–4 ng/mL). Prednisone dosage was 0.4 mg/kg. Subsequently, CNIs were completely withdrawn. Acute rejection episodes were excluded one and three months after conversion by endomyocardial biopsy and by echocardiography every three months thereafter. Results: After a mean follow‐up of 20 ± 16 months, CreaCl improved significantly: pre‐conversion vs. post‐conversion: 32.8 ± 12.2 mg/dL vs. 42.8 ± 21.14 mg/dL, p = 0.03. However, four acute rejection episodes occurred and patients were reconverted to CNIs. Additionally, six patients had a new onset of graft vessel disease (GVD) one yr after conversion. As a result of these adverse events, the study was stopped after inclusion of only 12 of the scheduled 30 patients. Conclusions: Conversion to MMF and steroids after HTx improves renal function, but increases the risk for recurrent rejection and GVD. Therefore, MMF and steroids should only be considered in patients with a markedly low risk for rejection.     

Maintenance immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids in pediatric kidney transplantation: temporary benefit but not without risk

BACKGROUND: Aiming at reducing cyclosporine toxicity, we investigated safety and efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as an immunosuppressive drug in pediatric kidney transplantation compared with cyclosporine (CsA), both in combination with corticosteroids. METHODS: One year after kidney transplantation, children on triple immunosuppression, having experienced no more than one, steroid-sensitive, acute rejection episode, were randomized to withdrawal of either CsA or MMF and were followed for 2 yr. RESULTS: In each group, two patients had an acute rejection episode during withdrawal. Treatment failure occurred in 3 of 21 MMF and 5 of 23 CsA patients. Final analysis was for 18 patients in either group. A larger than 10 mL/min 1.73 m decrease in glomerular filtration rate was observed in more patients on CsA than on MMF (73% vs. 29%, P=0.019). No differences in blood pressure or nightly decrease of blood pressure were noted. Hypercholesterolism improved in the MMF (-16%), but not the CsA group (+5%, P<0.05), over the first, but not over both study years. Differences in triglycerid levels between groups were not shown. At study end, MMF patients tended to have lower hemoglobin levels than patients on CsA. Two MMF patients experienced a first acute rejection episode during the second study year, resulting in chronic transplant glomerulopathy with graft loss in one and deterioration of kidney function in the other. CONCLUSION: In pediatric kidney transplantation, maintenance immunosuppression with MMF together with corticosteroids has short-term benefits for kidney function and lipid pattern compared with CsA but is not without risk of complications.     

Cyclosporine Sparing with Mycophenolate Mofetil, Daclizumab and Corticosteroids in Renal Allograft Recipients: The CAESAR Study

Although the calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) cyclosporine (CsA) and tacrolimus are highly effective immunosuppressants, they are associated with serious side effects. There is great interest in immunosuppressive regimens that permit reduction or elimination of CNIs, while maintaining adequate immunosuppression and acceptable acute rejection rates. Patients (n = 536) receiving their first renal allograft were randomized to one of three immunosuppressant regimens: daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), corticosteroids (CS) and low-dose CsA (target trough levels of 50-100 ng/mL), weaned from month 4 and withdrawn by month 6; daclizumab, MMF, CS and low-dose CsA; or MMF, CS and standard-dose CsA. Mean GFR 12 months after transplantation (primary end point) was not statistically different in the CsA withdrawal and low-dose CsA groups (both 50.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) vs. the standard-dose CsA group (48.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). At 12 months, the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was significantly higher in the CsA withdrawal group (38%) vs. the low- or standard-dose CsA groups (25.4% and 27.5%, respectively; p < 0.05). In summary, a regimen of continuous low-dose CsA with MMF, CS and daclizumab induction is a clinically safe and effective immunosuppressive regimen in renal transplant recipients.     

Mycophenolate mofetil vs azathioprine in a large population of elderly renal transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been shown to decrease acute rejection episodes after kidney transplantation, and has been associated with better graft and patient survival vs azathioprine (AZA). Previous studies reported a higher risk of death due to infection in elderly recipients treated with MMF-based immunosuppression. METHODS: We analysed 5069 elderly ( > 65 years of age) primary renal allograft recipients treated with either MMF or AZA reported to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients between 1988 and 2000, and compared rates of acute rejection, late acute rejection, graft survival, death-censored graft survival, patient survival and death with a functioning graft. RESULTS: In Cox proportional hazard models, MMF was associated with lower rates of late acute rejection with 12 (RR = 0.72, P = 0.11) and 24 months (RR = 0.50, P = 0.028) of continuous therapy. In univariate analysis (Kaplan-Meier), MMF was associated with improved patient (P = 0.0003) and graft (P<0.0001) survival vs AZA, and trends toward improved patient and graft survival in multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the efficacy of MMF-based immunosuppression in elderly transplant recipients and do not suggest an increased risk of death compared to treatment with AZA.     

Calcineurin Inhibitor Sparing With Mycophenolate Mofetil in Liver Transplantion: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Liver transplant recipients are at high risk of developing acute and chronic renal failure. Moreover, introduction of the model for end‐stage liver disease (MELD) score for primary allocation of liver grafts favors patients with pretransplant kidney dysfunction, which in turn have a higher risk of posttransplant renal failure. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) further increase the risk of renal failure and therefore sparing CNI with the use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) may improve renal function. MMF may either be used de novo in the immediate posttransplant period in combination with low‐dose CNI (scenario 1) or patients that receive immunosuppression based on CNI may be converted to MMF in combination with minimization or elimination of CNI (scenario 2). Although many retrospective cohort studies and nonrandomized trials have implicated efficacy of this approach the evidence from randomized controlled studies has not been summarized. In the current review we report the results of a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials.     

Influence of sirolimus on proteinuria in de novo kidney transplantation with expanded criteria donors: comparison of two CNI-free protocols.

BACKGROUND: The contribution of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors to proteinuria is controversial. The aim was to analyse proteinuria in suboptimal kidney calcineurin inhibitor-(CNI) free de novo immunosuppression. METHODS: All patients from our centre with donors >60 years and CNI-free treatment were included (n = 108). Patients were divided into two groups: (i) SRL group: sirolimus (SRL) + prednisone + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) + antiCD25; (ii) MMF group: prednisone + MMF w/ or w/o antiCD25 (n = 75). Follow-up was 12 months. RESULTS: Donors were slightly younger in the SRL group (68 vs 71 years; P < 0.05), receptor age (67 vs 65 years) was not significantly different. Patient survival in the MMF group was 88 vs 94% in the SRL group, however, these differences did not reach statistical significance. One-year graft survival censored for death was 83% in the MMF group and 94% in the SRL group. Acute rejection rate was 45% in the MMF and 15% in the SRL group (P < 0.01). The incidence of CNI introduction was higher in the MMF-group (35 vs 5; P < 0.05). The intention-to-treat analysis revealed significant differences of proteinuria [SRL vs MMF at 12 months: 461 (163-6988) vs 270 (53-3029) mg/day], which did not exist in the on-therapy (OT) analysis [SRL vs MMF at 12 months: 357 (199-1428) vs 279 (53-3029) mg/day]. New onset nephrotic range proteinuria seemed to occur slightly more frequently in SRL patients (3/33 vs 1/75; P = 0.049), however, all four cases occurred in a context of recurrent disease, or previous drug-independent damage or non-adherence. All of these patients were converted to CNI. CONCLUSION: SRL-based compared with MMF-based treatment in kidney transplantation with advanced age donors is associated with an acceptable outcome, however, with increased proteinuria in the intention-to-treat analysis. A large subgroup of the patients in the MMF group experienced acute rejection and required conversion to CNI.