重型颅脑损伤患者亚低温治疗的临床研究

目的 通过比较重型颅脑损伤患者亚低温治疗组与常温治疗组的预后来证实亚低温治疗的脑保护作用. 方法 选取重型颅脑损伤患者76例(GCS≤8分),分为亚低温治疗组(36例)和常温治疗组(40例).常温治疗组患者应用脱水降颅压、营养神经、止血、抑制胃酸分泌、营养支持等常规治疗.亚低温治疗组患者除常规治疗外,合并应用冰毯实行亚低温治疗(患者躺在冰毯垫上,通过体表散热使中心体温和脑温降至所需温度,通常为32～34℃,并根据病情需要维持3～14 d).结果亚低温治疗组患者预后优于常温组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05). 结论 亚低温治疗对重型颅脑损伤患者具有脑保护作用,能提高临床疗效,值得推广应用.     

重型颅脑损伤患者亚低温治疗的临床研究

Objective To compare the prognoses of patients with severe brain injury receiving mild hypothermia and normothermia interventions and evaluate the brain protective effect of mild hypothermia. Methods Seventy-six patients with severe head injury (Glaseow Coma Score≤8) were divided into mild hypothermia group (36 cases) and normothermia group (40 cases). The patients in the normothermia group were managed with measures for reducing the intracranial pressure and controlling the hemorrhage and gastric acid, with also administration of neurotrophic treatment and nutritional support. In addition to these conventional interventions, the patients in mild hypothermia group received mild hypothermia treatment administered using a water blanket to reduce the core body temperature and brain temperature to 32-34℃, which was maintained for 3-14 days as needed. Results The patients receiving mild hypothermia therapy had significantly improved prognosis in comparison with those in normothermia group (P<0.05). Conclusion Mild hypothermia treatment has brain protective effect and improves the prognosis of patients with severe brain injury.     

重型颅脑损伤患者亚低温治疗的临床研究

Objective To compare the prognoses of patients with severe brain injury receiving mild hypothermia and normothermia interventions and evaluate the brain protective effect of mild hypothermia. Methods Seventy-six patients with severe head injury (Glaseow Coma Score≤8) were divided into mild hypothermia group (36 cases) and normothermia group (40 cases). The patients in the normothermia group were managed with measures for reducing the intracranial pressure and controlling the hemorrhage and gastric acid, with also administration of neurotrophic treatment and nutritional support. In addition to these conventional interventions, the patients in mild hypothermia group received mild hypothermia treatment administered using a water blanket to reduce the core body temperature and brain temperature to 32-34℃, which was maintained for 3-14 days as needed. Results The patients receiving mild hypothermia therapy had significantly improved prognosis in comparison with those in normothermia group (P<0.05). Conclusion Mild hypothermia treatment has brain protective effect and improves the prognosis of patients with severe brain injury.     

重型颅脑损伤患者亚低温治疗的临床研究

Objective To compare the prognoses of patients with severe brain injury receiving mild hypothermia and normothermia interventions and evaluate the brain protective effect of mild hypothermia. Methods Seventy-six patients with severe head injury (Glaseow Coma Score≤8) were divided into mild hypothermia group (36 cases) and normothermia group (40 cases). The patients in the normothermia group were managed with measures for reducing the intracranial pressure and controlling the hemorrhage and gastric acid, with also administration of neurotrophic treatment and nutritional support. In addition to these conventional interventions, the patients in mild hypothermia group received mild hypothermia treatment administered using a water blanket to reduce the core body temperature and brain temperature to 32-34℃, which was maintained for 3-14 days as needed. Results The patients receiving mild hypothermia therapy had significantly improved prognosis in comparison with those in normothermia group (P<0.05). Conclusion Mild hypothermia treatment has brain protective effect and improves the prognosis of patients with severe brain injury.     

重型颅脑损伤患者亚低温治疗的临床研究

Objective To compare the prognoses of patients with severe brain injury receiving mild hypothermia and normothermia interventions and evaluate the brain protective effect of mild hypothermia. Methods Seventy-six patients with severe head injury (Glaseow Coma Score≤8) were divided into mild hypothermia group (36 cases) and normothermia group (40 cases). The patients in the normothermia group were managed with measures for reducing the intracranial pressure and controlling the hemorrhage and gastric acid, with also administration of neurotrophic treatment and nutritional support. In addition to these conventional interventions, the patients in mild hypothermia group received mild hypothermia treatment administered using a water blanket to reduce the core body temperature and brain temperature to 32-34℃, which was maintained for 3-14 days as needed. Results The patients receiving mild hypothermia therapy had significantly improved prognosis in comparison with those in normothermia group (P<0.05). Conclusion Mild hypothermia treatment has brain protective effect and improves the prognosis of patients with severe brain injury.     

重型颅脑损伤患者亚低温治疗的临床研究

Objective To compare the prognoses of patients with severe brain injury receiving mild hypothermia and normothermia interventions and evaluate the brain protective effect of mild hypothermia. Methods Seventy-six patients with severe head injury (Glaseow Coma Score≤8) were divided into mild hypothermia group (36 cases) and normothermia group (40 cases). The patients in the normothermia group were managed with measures for reducing the intracranial pressure and controlling the hemorrhage and gastric acid, with also administration of neurotrophic treatment and nutritional support. In addition to these conventional interventions, the patients in mild hypothermia group received mild hypothermia treatment administered using a water blanket to reduce the core body temperature and brain temperature to 32-34℃, which was maintained for 3-14 days as needed. Results The patients receiving mild hypothermia therapy had significantly improved prognosis in comparison with those in normothermia group (P<0.05). Conclusion Mild hypothermia treatment has brain protective effect and improves the prognosis of patients with severe brain injury.     

重型颅脑损伤患者亚低温治疗的临床研究

Objective To compare the prognoses of patients with severe brain injury receiving mild hypothermia and normothermia interventions and evaluate the brain protective effect of mild hypothermia. Methods Seventy-six patients with severe head injury (Glaseow Coma Score≤8) were divided into mild hypothermia group (36 cases) and normothermia group (40 cases). The patients in the normothermia group were managed with measures for reducing the intracranial pressure and controlling the hemorrhage and gastric acid, with also administration of neurotrophic treatment and nutritional support. In addition to these conventional interventions, the patients in mild hypothermia group received mild hypothermia treatment administered using a water blanket to reduce the core body temperature and brain temperature to 32-34℃, which was maintained for 3-14 days as needed. Results The patients receiving mild hypothermia therapy had significantly improved prognosis in comparison with those in normothermia group (P<0.05). Conclusion Mild hypothermia treatment has brain protective effect and improves the prognosis of patients with severe brain injury.     

重型颅脑损伤患者亚低温治疗的临床研究

Objective To compare the prognoses of patients with severe brain injury receiving mild hypothermia and normothermia interventions and evaluate the brain protective effect of mild hypothermia. Methods Seventy-six patients with severe head injury (Glaseow Coma Score≤8) were divided into mild hypothermia group (36 cases) and normothermia group (40 cases). The patients in the normothermia group were managed with measures for reducing the intracranial pressure and controlling the hemorrhage and gastric acid, with also administration of neurotrophic treatment and nutritional support. In addition to these conventional interventions, the patients in mild hypothermia group received mild hypothermia treatment administered using a water blanket to reduce the core body temperature and brain temperature to 32-34℃, which was maintained for 3-14 days as needed. Results The patients receiving mild hypothermia therapy had significantly improved prognosis in comparison with those in normothermia group (P<0.05). Conclusion Mild hypothermia treatment has brain protective effect and improves the prognosis of patients with severe brain injury.     

亚低温救治重型颅脑损伤的临床研究

目的研究亚低温救治重型颅脑损伤的治疗机制和效果。方法67例重型颅脑损伤病人随机分为亚低温组35例和对照组32例。亚低温组于伤后3～24h内,平均(12±3.3)h接受亚低温治疗,直肠温度(RT)控制在31.3～34.7℃,平均(33.7±1.1)℃持续7～14d,平均(171±25.3)h。同时监测生命体征、ICP、CPP、血SOD和血MDA、脑葡萄糖摄取、血糖、血乳酸、血气、血电解质和并发症。对照组RT控制在38℃以内,其它治疗同亚低温组。两组患者均于伤后3月根据GOS评定疗效。结果亚低温治疗组和对照组相比,亚低温治疗后36h两组ICP和CPP无显著差异。治疗120h开始亚低温组ICP明显降低(P<0.05),而CPP明显升高(P<0.05)。治疗36h后亚低温组血MDA明显低于对照组(P<0.05),而血SOD则明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。亚低温组和对照组治疗72h脑葡萄糖摄取分别为(6.33±0.2)mg%和(8.71±0.3)mg%,亚低温组明显低于对照组(P<0.05);复温后(第14天)分别为(12.7±0.5)mg%和(9.91±0.4)mg%,亚低温组则明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗36h后亚低温组血糖明显低于对照组(P<0.05),血乳酸亦明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后3个月GOS评分,亚低温组良好率62.9%(22/35)、中残率8.6%(3/35)、重残率11.4%(4/35)、植物生存5.7%(2/35)、死亡率11.4%(4/35),对照组分别为40.6%(13     

亚低温治疗重型颅脑损伤的临床研究

目的 :探讨亚低温对重型颅脑损伤的临床治疗效果。方法 :亚低温治疗组 2 4例 ,均于伤后 2 4h内进行亚低温治疗 ,设定治疗温度为肛温 32～ 35℃。于降温前及亚低温治疗过程中监测体温 (T)、心率 (HR)、血压 (BP)、呼吸 (R)。对照组 2 7例 ,均于出院后评定预后。结果 :亚低温治疗组病人伤后早期较高的心率 (HR)降至正常范围 ;与对照组相比 ,亚低温治疗组未发生严重并发症 ,死亡率下降 ,预后得到显著改善。结论 :亚低温治疗重型颅脑损伤是一种有效的方法 ,无严重并发症 ,可降低死亡率 ,提高生存质量。     

亚低温治疗重型脑外伤的神经电生理研究

目的　探讨亚低温对急性重型脑外伤的疗效。方法　选择受伤后 10小时内入院的急性重型脑外伤患者(GCS≤ 8) 44例 ,按伤情轻重分为GCS 6～ 8分和GCS 3～ 5分两组 ,各组再随机分成亚低温组和对照组。亚低温组(3 2～ 3 4℃ )于降温前、降温后 4、2 4、48、72、96、12 0小时及复温后监测正中神经短潜伏期体感诱发电位 (SLSEP)的N2 0 波幅和脑干听觉诱发电位 (BAEP)的I、V波幅比值 ;对照组在同样的时段监测上述指标 ,并行统计学分析比较。结果　GCS 6～ 8分的亚低温组降温 2 4小时及其后的两个诱发电位 (EP)指标较对照组有显著性差异 ,前者存活比例 (10 /14 )亦高于后者(3 /10 )。GCS 3～ 5分组有无亚低温治疗者 ,其EP检测结果及存活比例两组间均无显著性差异。结论　从EP监测显示 :亚低温对于重型脑外伤中GCS 6～ 8分者有显著的治疗作用 ,对 3～ 5分的病例则无明显疗效。     

亚低温治疗重型颅脑损伤的临床分析

目的 探讨亚低温对重型颅脑损伤的脑保护作用及临床疗效.方法 回顾性分析我院收治的251例特重型颅脑损伤患者,常规治疗组182例和亚低温治疗组69例.亚低温治疗组均在受伤后24 h内行亚低温治疗,比较两组的手术疗效及对患者预后的影响.结果 与常温治疗组比较,亚低温治疗组恢复良好率显著提高,病死率显著降低,预后改善显著,且并发症无明显增加.结论 在常规治疗的基础上加用亚低温治疗特重型颅脑外伤,可以明显改善患者的预后;能显著降低特重型颅脑损伤的死残率.