A Phase I/II Randomized Open-Label Multicenter Trial of Efalizumab, a Humanized Anti-CD11a, Anti-LFA-1 in Renal Transplantation

Leukocyte function associated antigen-1 (LFA-1) has a multifaceted role in the immune response, including adhesion and trafficking of leukocytes, stabilizing the immune synapse of the MHC-TCR complex and providing costimulation signals. Monoclonal antibodies to the CD11a chain of LFA-1 have been seen to result in effective immunosuppression in experimental models. Efalizumab, a humanized IgG1 anti-CD11a, is approved for use in psoriasis and may provide effective immunosuppression in organ transplantation. Thirty-eight patients undergoing their first living donor or deceased renal transplant were randomized to receive efalizumab 0.5 or 2 mg/kg weekly subcutaneously for 12 weeks. Patients were maintained on full dose cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids or half dose cyclosporine, sirolimus and prednisone. At 6 months following transplant patient survival was 97% and graft survival was 95%. Clinical biopsy-proven acute rejection in the first 6 months after transplantation was confirmed in 4 of 38 patients (11%). Three patients (8%) developed post transplant lymphoproliferative disease, all treated with the higher dose efalizumab and full dose cyclosporine. The two doses of efalizumab resulted in comparable saturation and modulation of CD11a. This phase II trial suggests that efalizumab may warrant further investigation in transplantation.     

Limited Dose Monoclonal IL-2R Antibody Induction Protocol after Primary Kidney Transplantation

This study prospectively compared immunoprophylaxis with a single intraoperative dose (2 mg/kg) of monoclonal interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R) antibody vs. noninduction in kidney transplant recipients treated with tacrolimus (FK 506), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and a prednisone-based immunosuppression regimen. One hundred recipients of first-kidney transplant were enrolled into the study to receive either anti-IL-2R monoclonal antibody, daclizumab (2 mg/kg intraoperatively, limited anti-IL-2R) or no induction (control). Each patient also received oral tacrolimus (dosed to target trough level 10-15 ng/mL), MMF (500 mg bid) and prednisone. The primary efficacy end-point was the incidence of biopsy proven acute rejection during the first 6 months post-transplant. The patients were also followed for 12-month graft function, and graft and patient survival rates. Other than the donor's age being significantly lower in the control group, both groups were comparable with respect to age, weight, gender, race, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR mismatch, panel reactive antibody (%PRA), cold ischemic time, cytomegalovirus (CMV) status, causes of renal failure, and duration and modes of renal replacement therapy (RRT). During the first 6 months, episodes of first biopsy confirmed acute rejection was 3/50 (6%) in the limited anti-IL-2R group and 8/50 (16%) in the controls (p < 0.05). Twelve-month patient 100/98 (%) and graft survival 100/96 (%) were not statistically different. The group receiving limited anti-IL-2R did not have any adverse reactions. Our study demonstrates that a limited (single) 2 mg/kg immunoprophylaxis dose with monoclonal IL-2R antibody (daclizumab) when combined with tacrolimus/MMF/steroid allows significant reduction in early renal allograft rejection to the single digit level. The therapy with anti-IL-2R antibody is simple and is well tolerated.     

An open-label randomized trial of the safety and efficacy of sirolimus vs. azathioprine in living related renal allograft recipients receiving cyclosporine and prednisone combination

BACKGROUND: The ability of sirolimus (SRL), in combination with reduced exposure of cyclosporine, was investigated to prevent acute rejection and associated side effects. METHODS: Between June 1999 and February 2000, 70 recipients of primary one-haplotype living-related donor renal allografts were randomized to receive SRL (2 mg/d) or azathioprine (AZA) (2 mg/kg/d) combined with cyclosporine and prednisone. The primary end-point was a composite of first occurrence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, graft loss, or death during the first 3 months after transplantation. RESULTS: From week 4 to month 12, SRL patients received lower cyclosporine (week 4: 364 mg/d vs. 455 mg/d, p = 0.004; month 12: 195 mg/d vs. 255 mg/d, p = 0.038) doses and showed lower cyclosporine concentrations (week 4: 247 ng/mL vs. 309 ng/mL, p = 0.04; month 12: 143 ng/mL vs. 188 ng/mL, p = 0.045). Compared with AZA, SRL patients showed reduced 3-month primary end point (0% vs. 17.1%, p = 0.025), and reduced incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection at 3 months (0% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.01) but not at 12 months (11.4% vs. 14.3%, NS). Mean creatinine at 12 months were not different (1.8 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.6 +/- 0.6, p = 0.23). Hyperlipidemia was the only adverse event more frequent among SRL patients (49% vs. 17%, p = 0.01). There were no differences in infections and no malignancies in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of 2 mg fixed doses of SRL, reduced cyclosporine exposure and prednisone was associated with a low incidence of acute rejection and did not result in significantly impaired graft function compared with patients receiving AZA, standard doses of cyclosporine and prednisone.     

Living related kidney transplantation without calcineurin inhibitors: initial experience in a Mexican center

We performed a prospective randomized trial comparing sirolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/prednisone to cyclosporine/MMF/prednisone and selected induction therapy with basiliximab. Twenty patients received sirolimus (10 mg loading dose followed by 3 mg/m body surface area/day, keeping 24-hr trough levels at 10-15 ng/mL for six months and 5-10 ng/mL thereafter. Twenty-one patients began cyclosporine (4 to 8 mg/kg/day, keeping 12-hour trough levels at 150-300 ng/mL for 6 months and 100-200 ng/mL afterwards). Mean follow up was 15.8 months. One-year patient and graft survival was similar in both groups (>90%). Acute rejection rate was 16.6% in the sirolimus group and 5.2% in the cyclosporine group (P=NS). There were no differences in mean serum creatinine between groups. No patients who received basiliximab and had sirolimus target levels suffered acute rejection at one year. The sirolimus group had significantly higher cholesterol and triglycerides. A calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen using sirolimus produces comparable one-year transplant outcomes in living related kidney transplants compared to a calcineurin inhibitor regimen.     

Comparison of steroid avoidance in tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus/sirolimus combination in kidney transplantation monitored by surveillance biopsy

BACKGROUND: Chronic steroid therapy in kidney transplantation has myriad side effects and steroid avoidance has become feasible. This prospective study compared the safety and efficacy of steroid avoidance in tacrolimus (TAC)/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and TAC/sirolimus (SRL) combinations in kidney transplantation. METHODS: In all, 150 kidney recipients were analyzed: 75 each in TAC/MMF and TAC/SRL groups. The primary endpoint was acute rejection. Surveillance biopsies were completed to analyze subclinical acute rejection (SCAR) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). Acute rejection and SCAR were treated by methylprednisolone. Two-year patient and graft survival, renal function, and adverse effects were monitored. RESULTS: Acute rejection was seen in 12% of TAC/MMF and 8% of TAC/SRL patients. Two-year actuarial patient survival was 95% and 97%, and graft survival 90% and 90% in TAC/MMF and TAC/SRL groups, respectively. Surveillance biopsy showed cumulative incidence of SCAR was 27 % in TAC/MMF and 16 % in TAC/SRL groups at 2 years (P = 0.04). Overall, 33% of recipients in TAC/MMF and 20% in TAC/SRL received methylprednisolone for acute rejection/SCAR. Moderate/severe CAN was 10% in TAC/SRL group and 22% in TAC/MMF group(P = 0.06). New-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) was 4% each in both groups. All recipients remain free of maintenance steroid therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Steroid avoidance in tacrolimus-based immunosuppression with MMF or SRL provides equivalent 2-year patient and graft survival with a low incidence of acute rejection and NODM. SCAR and CAN are lower in TAC/SRL compared to TAC/MMF group. The impact of decreased SCAR and CAN in TAC/SRL group on longer-term graft survival and function is to be evaluated.     

Randomized trial of cyclosporine and tacrolimus therapy with steroid withdrawal in living‐donor renal transplantation: 5‐year follow‐up

The aim of this study was to compare the long‐term safety and efficacy of immunosuppressive regimens consisting of cyclosporine (CsA) plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or tacrolimus (TAC) plus MMF after steroid withdrawal 6 months after kidney transplantation in low‐risk patients. One hundred and thirty‐one patients were randomized to receive either CsA (n = 63) or TAC (n = 68). Of these, 117 patients satisfied the criteria for steroid withdrawal (no biopsy‐proven rejection episode and serum creatinine level <2.0 mg/dl 6 months after transplantation). Fifty‐five recipients were of the CsA group, and 62 were of the TAC group. The 5‐year graft survival rate did not differ between groups (90.5% vs. 93.3% respectively; P = 0.55). The cumulative incidence of acute rejection 5 years after transplantation was 16.4% and 8.1% for the CsA and TAC groups respectively (P = 0.15). Post‐transplantation diabetes mellitus was more frequent in the TAC group than in the CsA group (P = 0.05), but the incidence of other side‐effects did not differ between groups. In conclusion, CsA‐ and TAC‐based regimens in conjunction with MMF have similar patient‐ and graft survival rates in low‐risk patients who underwent steroid withdrawal 6 months after kidney transplantation.     

Immunosuppression with generic tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients: preliminary report in Chile

The association of tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in renal transplant patients has diminished the incidence of acute rejection. We evaluated the use of generic TAC and MMF as primary immunosuppression in 6 living related (LR) and 11 cadaveric (C) donor renal transplant recipients (9 men, 8 women) of mean age 37 +/- 12 years (range, 17-56 years) between May 2006 and June 2007. From day 0 all patients received TAC, MMF, and prednisone without antibody induction. They were followed for the development of acute rejection, graft loss, side effects, and mortality. Mean follow-up was 7.6 months (range, 2-15 months). No biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes, graft loss, or recipient deaths were observed. Creatinine levels at the end of the study were 1.90 +/- 1.0 mg/dL (range, 0.62-4.25 mg/dL for C recipients and 1.19 +/- 0.15 mg/dL (range, 0.91-1.35 mg/dL) for LR recipients. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 130/73 mm Hg with 12 patients (70.5%) on antihypertensive therapy with calcium antagonists and beta-blockers. Mean (range) of total cholesterol, triglycerides, and glucose were 172 (110-244) mg/dL, 139 (69-277) mg/dL, and 89 (63-129) mg/dL, respectively. MMF was suspended in 1 patient due to diarrhea and 1 other because of leukopenia. We observed that generic TAC and MMF yielded effective and safe immunosuppression in terms of mortality, biopsy-proven acute rejection, and graft loss with a low incidence of adverse effects during the study period.     

Randomized trial of tacrolimus in combination with sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation: results at 6 months

BACKGROUND: This is the first report of a randomized, multicenter, clinical trial comparing the combination of sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. Results at 6 months of follow-up are presented. METHODS: Before transplantation, patients were randomized to receive tacrolimus plus corticosteroids with sirolimus (n=185) or MMF (n=176). The primary endpoint of the study was the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection. Patient and graft survival, renal function, and composite endpoints also were evaluated. Safety was assessed by monitoring laboratory parameters and adverse events. RESULTS: By 6 months of follow-up, the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection was similar in both treatment groups (13.0% tacrolimus+sirolimus vs. 11.4% tacrolimus+MMF; P=0.64 log-rank). Patient survival (97.3% tacrolimus+sirolimus vs. 97.7% tacrolimus+MMF) and graft survival (93.0% tacrolimus+sirolimus vs. 95.5% tacrolimus+MMF) were equivalent (P=0.53, overall survival log-rank). There was a significantly higher incidence of study drug discontinuation in patients receiving sirolimus (21.1% vs. 10.8%; P=0.008). Renal function was significantly better in the MMF-treatment group (serum creatinine 1.44+/-0.45 mg/dL vs. 1.77+/-1.42 mg/dL; P=0.018). Hyperlipidemia was significantly more prevalent in the sirolimus-treatment group. Diastolic blood pressure was significantly higher in sirolimus-treated patients. There were significantly more leukopenia and gastrointestinal adverse events in the MMF-treatment group. The incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus was 7.6% in the sirolimus group and 7.7% in the MMF group. CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus is equally effective in renal transplantation when combined with sirolimus or MMF. The tacrolimus-MMF combination may be superior in terms of improved renal function and improved cardiovascular risk factors including hyperlipidemia and hypertension.     

Twenty‐eight years of intestinal transplantation in Paris: experience of the oldest European center

Our aim was to describe our achievements in pediatric intestinal transplantation (ITx) and define areas for improvement. After a period (1987–1990) of nine isolated small bowel transplants (SBTx) where only one patient survived with her graft, 110 ITx were performed on 101 children from 1994 to 2014: 60 SBTx, 45 liver–small bowel, four multivisceral (three with kidneys), and one modified multivisceral. Indications were short bowel syndrome (36), motility disorders (30), congenital enteropathies (34), and others (1). Induction treatment was introduced in 2000. Patient/graft survival with a liver‐containing graft or SBTx was, respectively, 60/41% and 46/11% at 18 years. Recently, graft survival at 5/10 years was 44% and 31% for liver‐containing graft and 57% and 44% for SBTx. Late graft loss occurred in 13 patients, and 7 of 10 retransplanted patients died. The main causes of death and graft loss were sepsis and rejection. Among the 55 currently living patients, 21 had a liver‐containing graft, 19 a SBTx (17 after induction), and 15 were on parenteral nutrition. ITx remains a difficult procedure, and retransplantation even more so. Over the long term, graft loss was due to rejection, over‐immunosuppression was not a significant problem. Multicenter studies on immunosuppression and microbiota are urgently needed.     

A prospective, randomized trial of tacrolimus in combination with sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation: results at 1 year

BACKGROUND: This is the 1-year report of a randomized, multicenter, clinical trial comparing the combination of sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. METHODS: Prior to transplantation, recipients were randomized to receive tacrolimus plus corticosteroids with either sirolimus (n=185) or MMF (n=176). The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection at 6 months was the primary endpoint of the study. Patient and graft survival, renal function, study drug dosing and discontinuations were evaluated at 1 year. RESULTS: At 1 year, there was no difference in patient survival (95.7% sirolimus vs. 97.2% MMF; P=0.45) or graft survival (90.8% sirolimus vs. 94.3% MMF; P=0.22). Patients without delayed graft function (DGF) receiving MMF had significantly better graft survival (99% vs. 93%; P=0.01). Patients receiving a transplant from a live donor had a trend towards better graft survival with MMF as compared to sirolimus (98% vs. 91%; P=0.07). Patients receiving sirolimus had a significantly higher incidence of study drug discontinuation (26.5% vs. 14.8% MMF; P=0.006). Patients receiving MMF had significantly better renal function as shown by median serum creatinine levels (1.3 mg/dL vs. 1.5 mg/dL; P=0.03) and a trend towards higher calculated creatinine clearance (CrCl), (58.4 ml/min vs. 54.3 ml/min; P=0.06). More patients in the sirolimus group had a serum creatinine >2.0 mg/dL, (20.4% vs. 11.0%; P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Tacrolimus is safe and effective in live and deceased donor kidney transplantation when given in combination with sirolimus or MMF. Patient and graft survival were excellent in both arms. Renal function is superior for patients treated with tacrolimus + MMF combination.     

Single-shot antithymocyte globuline and daclizumab induction in simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant recipient: three-year results

Since 1996, preoperative single-shot dose antithymocyte globuline (ATG) with prednisolone (PRD), mycophenolate mofetile (MMF), and tacrolimus (TAC) is the favorite induction therapy in our center. In a series of 25 first simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant (SPK) recipients, 5 doses of daclizumab were administered in addition to standard induction. Here we present our 3-year experience. Immunosuppression was started prior to reperfusion consisting of daclizumab (1 mg/kg body weight [bw]), ATG (4-6 mg/kg bw) and 250 mg PRD. After surgery, PRD was reduced gradually, TAC trough levels were between 8-15 ng/mL, MMF was given twice daily (2-3 g/d) as well as 4 further doses dacilzumab every 14 days. After 3 years, patient, pancreas, and kidney graft survival rates are 100%, 84%, and 92%, respectively. Four pancreas grafts were lost (chronic allograft dysfunction, n = 2; recurrent abdominal infection, n = 1; acute rejection [AR] without treatment, n = 1). Both patients suffering from severe infection and untreated AR lost their kidney graft too. During the first 3 months after SPK, 3 AR episodes were observed in 2 patients (8%). After a 3-year period, 8 AR episodes occurred in 7 recipients (28%). AR was treated using PRD (n = 5) or ATG (n = 1). In 1 case, immunosuppression was switched from TAC to sirolimus successfully. Overall, 8 AR episodes occurred in 7 patients (28%) during the first 3 years after SPK. One severe infection led to graft lost 13 months after SPK. In this series, the combination of ATG and daclizumab prevented AR episodes, successfully providing considerable 3-year survival rates.     

Concentration-controlled use of sirolimus associated with reduced exposure of cyclosporine in black recipients of primarily living renal allograft donors: 12-month results

AIM: This study was designed to identify optimal therapeutic sirolimus (SRL) concentrations in black kidney transplant recipients on reduced cyclosporine (CsA) exposure and prednisone. METHODS: Seventy patients (64 living/six deceased) received CsA (8-10 mg/kg/d), prednisone, and 15 mg loading dose followed by 5-mg fixed doses of SRL till day 7 when they were randomized to maintain SRL trough concentrations (high-performance liquid chromatography) of 8-12 (GI = 34) or 15-20 (GII = 36) ng/mL. RESULTS: Mean CsA concentrations were 109 +/- 53 vs. 89 +/- 41 ng/mL and 75 +/- 54 vs. 60 +/- 35 ng/mL (ns) at 2 and 6 months. Accordingly, mean SRL trough concentrations were 12.4 +/- 6.1 vs. 20.0 +/- 9.5 ng/mL (p < 0.001) and 10.8 +/- 5.8 vs. 18.0 +/- 6.1 ng/mL (p < 0.001). The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection [13% (GI: 18% vs. GII: 8%, ns)], graft loss or death was 16% (GI: 21% vs. GII: 11%, ns]. There were no deaths and three graft losses (GI = 1; GII = 2). Creatinine clearance was higher in GI (64.5 +/- 17 vs. 54.4 +/- 14.7 mL/min, p = 0.011). The incidence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus was 13% and no CMV disease was observed. CONCLUSION: In black recipients of primarily living renal allograft donors reduced CsA exposure and SRL concentration-controlled regimens produced low incidences of acute rejection, post-transplant diabetes mellitus and CMV disease, with no significant impairment in graft function.     

Sequential quadruple immunosuppression including sirolimus in extended criteria and nonheartbeating donor kidney transplantation

The aim was to evaluate feasibility and safety of calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression in high-risk donor kidney transplantation with sequential sirolimus introduction. Kidney transplant patients (n=76) with a donor aged >60 years, donor with acute renal failure, or a nonheartbeating donor were included. Immunosuppression consisted of antithymocyte globulin or basiliximab, mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone, and sequential introduction of sirolimus. One-year patient survival was 96.2% and 95.8%; graft survival was 94.2% and 91.7%; acute rejection rates were 21.2% and 12.4%; delayed graft function was 21.2% and 66.7%; and creatinine clearance was 58+/-20 mL/min and 56+/-21 mL/min for the brain-dead donor group and the nonheartbeating donor group, respectively. Most adverse events were infections, but also three lymphoceles, three urinary fistulas, three wound seromas. Sequential sirolimus introduction in high-risk donor kidney transplantation was found to lead to good patient and graft survival and incidence of acute rejection and delayed graft function.     

Randomized Trial of Basiliximab Induction versus Steroid Therapy in Pediatric Liver Allograft Recipients Under Tacrolimus Immunosuppression

Avoidance of corticosteroids could be beneficial after pediatric liver transplantation (LTx). To test this hypothesis, we performed a randomized prospective study to compare immunosuppression with tacrolimus (TAC) and steroids versus TAC and basiliximab (BAS) after pediatric LTx. Seventy-two patients were recruited, 36 receiving TAC and steroids and 36 TAC and BAS. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of the first rejection episode. Secondary endpoints were the cumulative incidence and severity of rejection, patient and graft survival, and incidence of adverse events. Overall 1-year patient and graft survival rates were 91.4% and 85.5% in the steroid group, and 88.6% and 80% in the BAS group (p = NS). Patients free from rejection were 87.7% in the BAS group and 67.7% in the steroid group (p = 0.036). The use of BAS was associated with a 63.6% reduction in incidence of acute rejection episodes. Overall incidence of infection was 72.3% in the steroid group and 50% in the BAS group (p = 0.035). We conclude that the combination of TAC with BAS is an alternative to TAC and steroid immunosuppression in pediatric LTx, which allows for a significant reduction in the incidence of acute rejection and infectious complications.     

Tacrolimus Combined with Two Different Dosages of Sirolimus in Kidney Transplantation: Results of a Multicenter Study

Tacrolimus combined with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an effective regimen in kidney transplantation. This study compared the efficacy of combining tacrolimus and two different dosages of sirolimus with an established tacrolimus-MMF regimen. Each day in addition to tacrolimus, 325 patients received 2 mg sirolimus (TAC-SRL2 mg), 325 patients received 0.5 mg sirolimus (TAC-SRL0.5 mg) and 327 patients 1 g MMF (TAC-MMF). The initial tacrolimus dose was 0.2 mg/kg/day. Sirolimus patients received loading doses of 6 or 1.5 mg, and daily doses of 2 or 0.5 mg thereafter. Steroid administration was identical for all groups. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was lower in the TAC-SRL2 mg group (15.7%) compared with the TAC-SRL0.5 mg (25.2%, p = 0.003) and the TAC-MMF groups (22.3%, p = 0.036). Six-month graft survival was 91.0% (TAC-SRL2 mg), 92.6% (TAC-SRL0.5 mg) and 92.4% (TAC-MMF); the respective values for patient survival were 98.1%, 97.8% and 97.9%. Thirty-four patients (10.5%), 19 patients (5.8%) and 16 patients (4.9%) in the TAC-SRL2 mg, TAC-SRL0.5 mg and TAC-MMF groups, respectively, discontinued the study because of adverse events. Hyperlipemia was reported more often in the TAC-SRL2 mg group (24.0%) compared with 19.4% (TAC-SRL0.5 mg) and 11.0% (TAC-MMF; p < 0.05). Combining 2 mg sirolimus/day with tacrolimus results in lower rates of acute rejection, but a higher incidence of adverse events.     

Impact of mycophenolate mofetil on recurrent rejection in kidney transplant patients

PURPOSE: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has emerged as a valuable adjunctive agent in renal transplantation. However, due to intolerable adverse effects associated with MMF use in our transplant population, we have used MMF selectively in patients at high risk for recurrent graft rejection, since these patients are known to be at risk for poor long-term graft outcomes. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of MMF in preventing the recurrence of acute rejection following an initial rejection episode in kidney transplant patients in the first year following transplantation. METHODS: Forty-four kidney transplant recipients were given MMF prospectively following treatment of their initial rejection episode to prevent recurrent rejection. MMF 1-2 g/d was given. Doses were adjusted based on tolerance; MMF therapy was to be continued for at least 6 months. The control group consisted of 124 consecutive kidney transplant recipients who had received standard anti-rejection therapy without the addition of MMF. Maintenance immunosuppression consisted predominantly of cyclosporine, prednisone+/-azathioprine. Anti-rejection therapy for both groups consisted of either corticosteroids (methylprednisolone 500 mg i.v. for 3 d or oral prednisone 2 mg/kg/d with rapid taper over 3 wk), OKT3 5 mg/d for 10 d or ATG 15 mg/kg/d for 10 d. All rejection episodes were confirmed by biopsy. RESULTS: The majority of rejection episodes were characterized histologically as mild or moderate. Most patients (76%) received corticosteroids for treatment of their first rejection episode. There was a 68% reduction in the incidence of recurrent rejection episodes within the first year of transplant in patients receiving MMF; only 14% of recipients receiving MMF developed recurrent rejection compared to 44% of patients in the control group (p<0.05). Approximately 50% of patients developed MMF-associated adverse effects (leukopenia, GI toxicity). Only 52% of patients remained on MMF at 6 months. One-yr graft survival was 86% in the MMF group and 89% in the control group (p>0.05). One-year patient survival was 93 and 100%, respectively (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of MMF to maintenance therapy for patients experiencing acute renal allograft rejection may prevent recurrent rejection episodes in the subsequent follow-up year.     

肾移植术后患者应用西罗莫司对他克莫司剂量的影响

目的观察肾移植术后联合应用西罗莫司(雷帕霉素)对他克莫司(FK506)剂量的影响。方法60例肾移植术后患者随机分为两组,研究组30例,免疫抑制方案采用西罗莫司+他克莫司+泼尼松;对照组30例,采用麦考酚吗乙酯(MMF)+他克莫司+泼尼松联合治疗。术后随访2年,比较两组的人、肾存活率,急性排斥反应率,他克莫司用量,肾功能变化和不良事件发生率。结果研究组、对照组全部如期完成观察,两组的人肾存活率均为100%,研究组、对照组急性排斥反应发生率分别为7%(2/30)、10%(3/30),经肾上腺皮质激素(激素)冲击治疗后逆转;研究组在维持他克莫司血药浓度与对照组相当情况下,其用量低于对照组,比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。两组的不良事件发生率相近(60%比70%,P0.05)。结论联合西罗莫司+他克莫司+泼尼松方案用作肾移植术后免疫抑制治疗是安全有效的,且能减少他克莫司的剂量。     

A multicenter, open-label, comparative trial of two daclizumab dosing strategies vs. no antibody induction in combination with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids for the prevention of acute rejection in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant recipients: interim analysis

INTRODUCTION: The safety and efficacy of daclizumab (1 mg/kg/dose every 14 d for five doses) has been established in kidney and heart transplant recipients. Alternative dosing regimens based on pharmacokinetic simulation and limited clinical trials are being investigated. The purpose of this ongoing multicenter study is to determine the safety and efficacy of two dosing regimens of daclizumab as an adjunctive immunosuppressive agent compared with no antibody induction in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant (SKPT) recipients receiving tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids as primary immunosuppression. METHODS: This is an interim report of a multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized study with a target enrolment of 290 patients. Eligible SKPT patients were randomized to one of three groups: daclizumab 1 mg/kg/dose every 14 d for five doses (Group I), daclizumab 2 mg/kg/dose every 14 d for two doses (Group II), and no antibody induction (Group III). The primary endpoint of the study is a composite of the incidence of presumed or biopsy-proven kidney or pancreas rejection, graft loss, or death within the first 6 months post-transplantation. RESULTS: A total of 166 patients were randomized into the three groups [Group I (n = 70), Group II (n = 74), Group III (n = 22)]. Demographic and transplant characteristics were similar among the groups. At a minimum follow-up of 3 months, patient, kidney and pancreas graft survival rates were similar among the three groups. However, the rates of acute renal allograft rejection were 18% (Group I), 8% (Group II), and 36% (Group III), p < 0.05. The probabilities of either kidney or pancreas allograft rejection were 22% (Group I), 8% (Group II), and 38% (Group III). At 3 months, the actuarial event-free survival (no acute rejection, allograft loss, or death) rates were 67, 81 and 50% in Groups I, II, and III, respectively. There were no differences in the incidence of infectious complications among the groups and no serious adverse events associated with daclizumab were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The two-dose regimen (Group II) appears to be as effective as the five-dose regimen (Group I) in preventing acute rejection after SKPT and is associated with the lowest acute rejection rates and the highest rate of event-free survival (no rejection or graft loss). However, the benefits of daclizumab compared with no antibody induction await larger sample size accrual.     

Impact of age on renal graft survival in children after the first rejection episode

Infants are thought to be more immunoreactive and at a greater risk for developing irreversible rejection compared with older children. We investigated this by analyzing patient and graft survival rates, incidence of acute rejection, reversibility of acute rejection, development of a subsequent acute rejection, and incidence of graft loss due to rejection in 154 children (<18 years of age) after primary renal transplantation. Most patients (n = 139) were treated with quadruple immunosuppression (antibody, azathioprine, prednisone, cyclosporine). Treatment of the first acute rejection episode (ARE) consisted of antibody and increased prednisone (68%) or increased prednisone alone (30%), and was not significantly different between the age groups. Transplants were from living donors (LRD) in 80% of cases. Patients were followed for at least 1 year (mean 58±30 months); 68% (105/154) of recipients experienced 1 or more ARE. The incidence of ARE was significantly lower in patients <2 years of age (45%) compared with patients 2 – 5 (76%, P = 0.01), 6 – 12 (78%, P = 0.005), and 13 – 17 (76%, P = 0.009) years of age. There was no significant difference in the 1-, 2- and 5-year patient or graft survival rates, the development of a subsequent acute rejection, or the incidence of graft loss due to acute rejection when analyzed by age group. These data suggest that the impact of an ARE is similar for younger and older children in our population receiving predominantly LRD transplants and quadruple immunosuppression. Received April 25, 1995; received in revised form and accepted January 30, 1996     

The Leuven Immunomodulatory Protocol Promotes T‐Regulatory Cells and Substantially Prolongs Survival After First Intestinal Transplantation

Intestinal transplantation (ITx) remains challenged by frequent/severe rejections and immunosuppression‐related complications (infections/malignancies/drug toxicity). We developed the Leuven Immunomodulatory Protocol (LIP) in the lab and translated it to the clinics. LIP consists of experimentally proven maneuvers, destined to promote T‐regulatory (Tregs)‐dependent graft‐protective mechanisms: donor‐specific blood transfusion (DSBT); avoiding high‐dose steroids/calcineurin‐inhibitors; and minimizing reperfusion injury and endotoxin translocation. LIP was tested in 13 consecutive ITx from deceased donors (2000–2014) (observational cohort study). Recipient age was 37 years (2.8–57 years). Five‐year graft/patient survival was 92%. One patient died at 9 months due to aspergillosis, another at 12 years due to nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drug–induced enteropathy. Early acute rejection (AR) developed in two (15%); late AR in three (23%); all were reversible. No chronic rejection (CR) occurred. No malignancies developed and estimated glomerular filtration rate remained stable post‐Tx. At last follow‐up (3.5 years [0.5–12.5 years]), no donor‐specific antibodies were detected and 11 survivors were total parenteral nutrition free with a Karnofsky score >90% in 8 recipients (follow‐up >1 years). A high frequency of circulating CD4⁺CD45RA^‐Foxp3^hi memory Tregs was found (1.8% [1.39–2.21]), comparable to tolerant kidney transplant (KTx) recipients and superior to stable immunosuppression (IS)‐KTx, KTx with CR, and healthy volunteers. In this ITx cohort we show that DSBT in a low‐inflammatory/pro‐regulatory environment activates Tregs at levels similar to tolerant‐KTx, without causing sensitization. LIP limits rejection under reduced IS and thereby prolongs long‐term survival to an extent not previously attained after ITx.