Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of S9788, a new multidrug-resistance reversal agent given alone and in combination with doxorubicin to patients with advanced solid tumors

Purpose: The objectives of this phase I study were to evaluate the toxic effects and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of S9788, a new modifier of multidrug resistance (MDR), when given alone and in combination with doxorubicin to patients with advanced solid tumors; to achieve a potentially active plasma concentration of S9788; and to study the pharmacokinetics of both drugs. Methods: A total of 26 patients (median age 58 years) entered the study. S9788 was given alone as a 30-min infusion at day 1 and in combination with a 50-mg/m² bolus of doxorubicin at days 8 and 29. Dose levels of S9788 were escalated from 8 to 96 mg/m² according to the modified Fibonacci scheme. Plasma samples were taken predose as well as during and up to 48 h after the beginning of infusion for S9788 and doxorubicin quantitation. Fractionated urine samples were also collected for up to 24 h for S9788 determination. Results: The dose-limiting side effects of S9788 consisted of bradycardia, sometimes associated with faintness or dizziness. The MTD of S9788 was 96 mg/m². No enhancement of doxorubicin toxicity was observed. One partial response (duration 140 days) was observed at 96 mg/m² in a patient with multiple lung metastases from a refractory urothelial carcinoma. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed in 24 patients. Since the mean apparent elimination half-life of S9788 was 46 ± 23 h and the last plasma sampling time was 48 h, only model-independent parameters were considered. Plasma levels of S9788 were below the limit of quantitation (4 × 10^–3μM ) before each drug administration. S9788 plasma levels of up to 3.7 μM could be obtained with this administration schedule. The urinary elimination of the unchanged drug was negligible, whatever the collection period. In spite of the large inter- and intraindividual variability, plasma pharmacokinetics of S9788 given as a 30-min i.v. infusion were linear up to 96 mg/m² and were not modified by doxorubicin administration. Doxorubicin pharmacokinetic parameters did not seem to be influenced by S9788 coadministration. Conclusion: The dose-limiting toxicity of S9788 consisted of bradycardia or clinical symptoms suggesting a vasovagal impact such as faintness or dizziness. The MTD of S9788 was 96 mg/m². The pharmacokinetic parameters of doxorubicin in this study were close to those usually described and were not influenced by escalation of the S9788 dose. No pharmacokinetic interaction was observed between S9788 and doxorubicin. The clinical tolerability of the combined treatment is in good agreement with the pharmacokinetic findings, since no enhancement of doxorubicin toxicity was observed. Received: 13 July 1996 / Accepted: 4 July 1997     

QT interval prolongation among patients treated with angiogenesis inhibitors

Among toxicities associated with molecular targeted agents (MTA), cardiovascular toxicities remain largely unknown or underestimated. Their frequency is variable and dependent on the compound. A high incidence of hypertension, symptomatic or asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction, acute coronary syndrome, arterial and venous thrombosis has been observed in patients receiving MTA. One of the most threatening complications of angiogenic inhibitors (AI) could be QT prolongation with the risk of torsade de pointes (TdP) and sudden death. QT prolongation and torsade de pointes accounted for 29% of cardiac and non-cardiac post-marketing withdrawals. The assessment of the effects of drugs on cardiac repolarization is the subject of recent guidelines and recommendations. Regulatory agencies now require practically every new pharmaceutical compound to undergo a thorough investigation of its propensity to modify cardiac repolarization. To reduce the incidence of QT prolongation and torsade de pointes in patients receiving AI, cancer patients should be closely monitored while receiving AI.     

Phase IB study of doxorubicin in combination with the multidrug resistance reversing agent S9788 in advanced colorectal and renal cell cancer.

S9788 is a new triazineaminopiperidine derivate capable of reversing multidrug resistance (MDR) in cells resistant to chemotherapeutic agents such as doxorubicin. It does not belong to a known class of MDR revertants, but its action involves the binding of P-glycoprotein. Thirty-eight evaluable patients with advanced colorectal or renal cell cancer were treated with doxorubicin alone (16 patients) followed after disease progression with combination treatment of doxorubicin plus S9788 (12 patients) or upfront with the combination of doxorubicin plus S9788 (22 patients). S9788 was given i.v. as a loading dose of 56 mg m-2 over 30 min followed by doxorubicin given at 50 mg m-2 as a bolus infusion. Thereafter, a 2-h infusion of S9788 was administered at escalating doses ranging from 24 to 120 mg m-2 in subsequent cohorts of 4-10 patients. Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated that concentrations of S9788 that are known to reverse MDR in vitro were achieved in patients at non-toxic doses. Compared with treatment with doxorubicin alone, treatment with the combination of doxorubicin and S9788 produced a significant increase in the occurrence of WHO grade 3-4 granulocytopenia. Treatment with S9788 was cardiotoxic as it caused a dose-dependent and reversible increase in corrected QT intervals as well as clinically non-significant arrhythmias on 24- or 48-h Holter recordings. Although clinically relevant cardiac toxicities did not occur, the study was terminated as higher doses of S9788 may increase the risk of severe cardiac arrhythmias. Twenty-nine patients treated with S9788 plus doxorubicin were evaluable for response, and one patient, who progressed after treatment with doxorubicin alone, achieved a partial response. We conclude that S9788 administered at the doses and schedule used in this study results in relevant plasma concentrations in humans and can safely be administered in combination with doxorubicin.     

Phase I trial of erlotinib combined with cisplatin and radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced cervical squamous cell cancer

PURPOSE: This phase I trial was aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose and related toxicity of erlotinib (E) when administered concurrently with standard chemoradiation (CRT) for cervical cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In a modified Fibonacci design, the study aimed to study three cohorts of at least three patients receiving escalating doses of erlotinib (50/100/150 mg) combined with cisplatin (40 mg/m(2), weekly, 5 cycles) and radiotherapy (external beam 4,500 cGy in 25 fractions, followed by 4 fractions/600 cGy/weekly of brachytherapy) in squamous cell cervical carcinoma patients, stage IIB to IIIB. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were enrolled, 3 at dose level (DL) 50 mg, 4 at DL 100 mg, and 8 at DL 150 mg. Patients presented median age 47 (36-59), stage IIB (46.2%) and IIIB (53.8%). Overall, E+CRT was well-tolerated. Three patients did not complete the planned schedule. One patient at DL 100 mg withdrew informed consent due to grade 2 rash; at DL 150 mg, 1 patient presented Raynaud's Syndrome and had C interrupted, and another patient presented grade 4 hepatotoxicity. The latter was interpreted as dose limiting toxicity and a new cohort of 150 mg was started. No further grade 4 toxicity occurred. Grade 3 toxicity occurred in 6 cases: diarrhea in 3 patients, rash in 2 patients, and leukopenia in 1 patient. E+CRT did not lead to limiting in-field toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: E+CRT is feasible to locally advanced squamous cell cervical cancer and is well tolerated. The maximum tolerated dose has been defined as 150 mg. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a combination of erlotinib, cisplatin, and pelvic radiotherapy.     

A phase I study of weekly administration of CPT-11 in lung cancer

A clinical study of weekly administration of CPT-11, a semi-synthetic derivative of Camptothecin, was performed in patients with advanced lung cancer to determine the optimal dose for a weekly single dose schedule. Sixteen out of 19 patients enrolled were evaluable. The starting dose was 50 mg/m2 and gradually escalated to 100, 125 and 150 mg/m2. CPT-11 was given by intravenous infusion for 90 minutes every week. The maximum tolerated dose for this schedule was estimated to be 125 mg/m2. The dose-limiting toxicity was leukopenia with median nadir of 2,900/mm3, median day to nadir of 21, and median day to recovery of 7. Other major toxicity was gastrointestinal upset, but was mild and tolerable. Objective tumor responses were observed in four patients, three with non-small cell carcinoma and one with double cancer (small and non-small cell carcinoma). The responding patients were treated at a dosage of 100 mg/m2 or more. The recommended dose for a phase II study is considered to be 100 mg/m2 iv infusion for a weekly single-dose schedule.     

Phase I study of cinchonine, a multidrug resistance reversing agent, combined with the CHVP regimen in relapsed and refractory lymphoproliferative syndromes.

Overexpression of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) in cancer cells reduces intracellular accumulation of various anticancer drugs including anthracyclines and vinca alkaloids. This multidrug resistance (MDR) phenotype can be reversed in vitro by a number of non-cytotoxic drugs. We have identified the quinine's isomer cinchonine as a potent MDR reversing agent, both in vitro and in animal models. Here, we report an open phase I dose escalation trial in patients with refractory or relapsed malignant lymphoid diseases. Cinchonine dihydrochloride was administered by continuous i.v. infusion for 48 h and escalated over five dose levels ranging from 15 to 35 mg/kg/d. Cinchonine infusion started 24 h before i.v. doxorubicin (25 mg/m2), vinblastine (6 mg/m2), cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) and methylprednisolone (1 mg/kg/d) (CHVP regimen) and lasted for 24 h after chemotherapy infusion. Thirty-four patients received 87 cycles of CHVP/cinchonine. The MTD of cinchonine administered by continuous i.v. infusion was 30 mg/kg/d. Prolonged cardiac repolarization was the main dose-limiting toxicity. No ventricular arrhythmia including 'torsade de pointes' was observed. An MDR reversing activity was identified in the serum from every patient and correlated with cinchonine serum level. When infused at 30 mg/kg/d, cinchonine demonstrated a limited influence on doxorubicin pharmacokinetic. We conclude that i.v. infusion of cinchonine might be started 12 h before MDR-related chemotherapy infusion and requires continuous cardiac monitoring but no reduction of cytotoxic drug doses.     

Phase I and clinical pharmacological evaluation of aphidicolin glycinate

The toxicity profile and the pharmacokinetics of aphidicolin glycinate, a water-soluble analogue of aphidicolin, have been evaluated in two consecutive phase I clinical studies. In the first study, aphidicolin glycinate was given by 1-hour infusion for 5 consecutive days, every 3 weeks (daily x 5 study); in the second study, which was planned on the basis of the pharmacokinetic information obtained in the previous study, the drug was given by 24-hour continuous infusion. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. In the daily x 5 study, the daily dose was escalated from 12 mg/m2 to the maximum tolerated dose of 2250 mg/m2. Local toxicity was dose limiting. Elimination half-life was 2 +/- 0.2 hours (mean +/- SE) with aphidicolin being undetectable 6-8 hours after the end of the infusion. In the 24-hour continuous-infusion study, the dose was escalated from 435 mg/m2 to the maximum tolerated dose of 4500 mg/m2. Local toxicity was dose limiting, while other toxic effects were absent. The experimentally determined concentrations at the steady state were in agreement with those predicted on the basis of the available pharmacokinetic data. The targeted concentration at the steady state of 3 micrograms/mL was achieved at doses greater than or equal to 3000 mg/m2. Twenty-four-hour continuous infusion is the recommended schedule for clinical evaluations of aphidicolin glycinate as the synchronizing agent or in combination with cisplatin.     

Phase I study of a weekly schedule of fixed-dose paclitaxel and escalating doses of cisplatin for recurrent or unresectable gastric cancer in Japan

The authors objective was to determine the toxicities and maximum tolerated dose of a dose-dense schedule of fixed-dose paclitaxel and escalating doses of cisplatin in patients with recurrent or unresectable carcinoma of the stomach. On days 1, 8, 15, 29, 36, and 43, patients received a fixed dose of paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 over 1 hour after a short premedication) followed by a 30-minute infusion of cisplatin at dose levels of 7, 15, 20, and 25 mg/m2. Six patients were treated at each dose level, except for the dose of 25 mg/m2 cisplatin. All the patients were assessed for toxicity and 17 patients (81%) were evaluated for response. The cisplatin dose could be escalated to 25 mg/m2. At the dose of 80 mg/m2 paclitaxel and 25 mg/m2 cisplatin, all 3 patients developed dose-limiting toxicity of the gastrointestinal tract. There were no treatment-related deaths. Leukopenia grades 3 or 4 was seen in 5 patients (11.1%), but infectious complications were not encountered. Other toxicities were mild and easily managed. Weekly paclitaxel at a dose of 80 mg/m2 infused over 1 hour, followed by an infusion of 20 mg/m2 cisplatin is recommended for further study in patients with recurrent or unresectable gastric cancer.     

Phase I study of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor flavopiridol in combination with paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Preclinical studies indicate that the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor flavopiridol potentiates the induction of apoptosis by paclitaxel, provided paclitaxel is followed by flavopiridol. We therefore designed a phase I clinical trial of sequential paclitaxel and flavopiridol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Paclitaxel was administered at a fixed dose, as either a 24- or 3-hour infusion on day 1, followed by a 24-hour infusion of flavopiridol on day 2. Doses of flavopiridol were escalated in successive cohorts according to a modified Fibonacci design. Flavopiridol pharmacokinetics were obtained on all patients. RESULTS: Dose-limiting neutropenia developed with 24-hour paclitaxel doses of 135 and 100 mg/m(2) and flavopiridol doses of 10 and 20 mg/m(2), respectively. With 3-hour paclitaxel at 100 mg/m(2), flavopiridol could be escalated to 70 mg/m(2) without dose-limiting toxicity. With 3-hour paclitaxel next escalated to 135 mg/m(2), dose-limiting neutropenia and pulmonary toxicity occurred when flavopiridol was escalated to 94 mg/m(2). This did not correlate with any change in flavopiridol or paclitaxel pharmacokinetics. At a 3-hour paclitaxel dose of 175 mg/m(2), dose-limiting pulmonary toxicity occurred in only one patient at flavopiridol doses under 94 mg/m(2). Clinical activity was observed in patients with esophagus, lung, and prostate cancer, including patients who had progressed on paclitaxel. CONCLUSION: The recommended phase II doses will be a 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel at 175 mg/m(2) on day 1 followed by a 24-hour infusion of flavopiridol at 70 mg/m(2) on day 2. Flavopiridol dose escalations to 80 mg/m(2) are possible. At these doses, toxicities are manageable and clinical activity is promising.     

Phase I and clinical pharmacology trial of 502U83 using a monthly single dose schedule

502U83 is an arylmethylaminopropanediol derivative exhibiting significant antineoplastic activity in a number of murine and human tumor models. In this Phase I trial, a 1-h or 4-h infusion of the agent was administered i.v. in 250 ml of 5% dextrose in water every 28 days. Fifty-three courses at doses of 25 to 2000 mg/m2 were administered to 36 patients with refractory solid tumors. Prolongation of the PR, QRS, and QT intervals on electrocardiograms was dose limiting at 2000 mg/m2. This prolongation appeared dose related and was reversible upon discontinuation of the infusion. No hematological toxicity was observed. Other toxicities included only sporadic and mild to moderate nausea and vomiting. No tumor responses were noted. 502U83 plasma concentrations were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography. Complete pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained for 21 of the 36 patients. After infusion, plasma concentrations declined in a biexponential or in a triexponential manner with a harmonic mean terminal t 1/2 of 8.83 h. Using a three-compartment model, the mean apparent volume of distribution at steady state and total-body clearance were 195 liters/m2 and 42.5 liters/h/m2, respectively, indicative of extensive tissue distribution. No correlation could be found between the pharmacokinetic parameters and prolongation of the cardiac conduction intervals. Because of the cardiac effects with the drug, the schedule of administration of 502U83 used in this study cannot be recommended.     

Sequence effect of irinotecan and fluorouracil treatment on pharmacokinetics and toxicity in chemotherapy-naive metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To investigate the sequence effect of irinotecan and a 48-hour infusion of fluorouracil (5-FU) modulated by leucovorin (LV) on the plasma pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites, the toxicity profile of this combination, and irinotecan's maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three metastatic colorectal cancer patients were randomized to receive a 60-minute infusion of irinotecan before or after a 48-hour infusion of 5-FU modulated by LV. The reverse sequence was used after 21 days for the second cycle. 5-FU 3,500 mg/m2 was preceded by l-LV 250 mg/m2. Irinotecan 150 mg/m2 (starting dose) was administered to the first three patients. The dose was escalated by 50 mg/m2 in subsequent groups of three to six patients to determine the MTD for both sequences. Pharmacokinetic analysis of irinotecan and its metabolites was performed after each cycle. RESULTS: Toxicities were affected by the sequence of administration of irinotecan and 5-FU, with an improved tolerability for irinotecan followed by 5-FU. The irinotecan MTD was reached at 300 mg/m2 when irinotecan followed 5-FU and at 450 mg/m2 when it preceded 5-FU. In seven of 23 patients who received both sequences at identical irinotecan doses, the dose-limiting toxicity was observed only when irinotecan followed 5-FU. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that the administration sequence significantly affected the SN-38 area under the concentration-versus-time curve (AUC), which was 40.1% lower (P <.05) when irinotecan preceded 5-FU. CONCLUSION: The sequence of treatment with irinotecan and infusional 5-FU affects the tolerability of this combination. This can be explained in part by a reduced SN-38 AUC when irinotecan preceded infusional 5-FU. Well-defined 5-FU/irinotecan regimens are needed because the administration sequence or the interval between the agents might affect treatment tolerance and perhaps also activity.     

Phase I trial of fludarabine and paclitaxel in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Fludarabine is an active agent in low-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Paclitaxel is also active in patients with refractory lymphoma, and preclinical data suggest an additive effect with fludarabine in vitro. We performed a phase I trial of fludarabine (25 mg/m² d 1–3) plus a 3-h infusion of paclitaxel (125, 150, or 175 mg/m²) on d 3 every 28 d in 13 patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The paclitaxel dose was escalated in cohorts of 3–4 patients using standard phase I design schema. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as febrile neutropenia, platelet nadir less than 50,000/μL, or grade 3–4 nonhematologic toxicity. Thirteen patients were accrued to the study, 8 of these 13 patients (62%) had received prior chemotherapy. At the 125-, 150-, and 175-mg/m² dose levels of paclitaxel, dose-limiting toxicity occurred in 1/4, 0/4, and 0/4 patients, respectively. The single patient with dose-limiting toxicity had febrile neutropenia. Partial response occurred in two of eight patients with low-grade lymphoma and none of five patients with other types of lymphoma. A paclitaxel dose of 175 mg/m² given as a 3-h infusion on d 3 in conjunction with fludarabine (25 mg/m² d 1–3 every 4 wk) is a well-tolerated regimen for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Further study will be required in order to determine whether the fludarabine-paclitaxel is more active than fludarabine alone in patients with low-grade lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia.     

CPT-11 in combination with cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicities of CPT-11, a new derivative of camptothecin, in combination with a fixed dose of cisplatin in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven previously untreated patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were assessable for toxicity, and 26 were assessable for response. The initial dose of CPT-11 was 30 mg/m2 given as a 90-minute intravenous (IV) infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 in combination with cisplatin (80 mg/m2 IV on day 1) given every 4 weeks. The dose of CPT-11 was escalated in increments of 10 mg/m2 until severe or life-threatening toxic effects were observed. RESULTS: Significant toxicity was infrequent up to 60 mg/m2 of CPT-11. The maximum-tolerated toxicity was reached at a dose of 70 mg/m2. Three of six patients either had leukocyte count nadirs of less than 2,000/microL or experienced grade 4 diarrhea during the first cycle of therapy at 70 mg/m2. The major toxic effects were leukopenia and diarrhea. There were 14 partial responses (54%) among the 26 patients. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of CPT-11 and cisplatin seems to be effective against NSCLC with acceptable toxicities. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 60 mg/m2 of CPT-11 on days 1, 8, and 15, and 80 mg/m2 of cisplatin on day 1 every 4 weeks.     

A phase I clinical trial of continual alternating etoposide and topotecan in refractory solid tumours

The goal of this phase I study was to develop a novel schedule using oral etoposide and infusional topotecan as a continually alternating schedule with potentially optimal reciprocal induction of the nontarget topoisomerase. The initial etoposide dose was 15 mg m(-2) b.i.d. days (D)1-5 weeks 1,3,5,7,9 and 11, escalated 5 mg per dose per dose level (DL). Topotecan in weeks 2,4,6,8,10 and 12 was administered by 96 h infusion at an initial dose of 0.2 mg m(-2) day(-1) with a dose escalation of 0.1, then at 0.05 mg m(-2) day(-1). Eligibility criteria required no organ dysfunction. Two dose reductions or delays were allowed. A total of 36 patients with a median age of 57 (22-78) years, received a median 8 (2-19) weeks of chemotherapy. At DL 6, dose-limiting toxicities consisted of grade 3 nausea, vomiting and intolerable fatigue. Three patients developed a line-related thrombosis or infection and one subsequently developed AML. There was no febrile neutropenia. There were six radiologically confirmed responses (18%) and 56% of patients demonstrated a response or stable disease, typically with only modest toxicity. Oral etoposide 35 mg m(-2) b.i.d. D1-5 and 1.8 mg m(-2) 96 h (total dose) infusional topotecan D8-11 can be administered on an alternating continual weekly schedule for at least 12 weeks, with promising clinical activity.     

Phase I study of O6-benzylguanine and temozolomide administered daily for 5 days to pediatric patients with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: This pediatric phase I trial of O6-benzylguanine (O6BG) and temozolomide (TMZ) on a daily schedule for 5 days, every 28 days was performed to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of TMZ when given with a biologically active dose of O6BG and to define the toxicity profile of the combination in children with solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients < or = 21 years old with refractory solid tumors were eligible. O6BG was administered intravenously over 60 minutes daily for 5 days. TMZ was administered orally 30 minutes after completion of each O6BG infusion. Starting doses of O6BG and TMZ were 60 mg/m2/d and 28 mg/m2/d, respectively. O6BG was escalated to 90 and 120 mg/m2/d; TMZ was subsequently escalated to 40, 55, 75, and 100 mg/m2/d. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were enrolled; 32 patients were assessable for toxicity. The combination of O6BG and TMZ was tolerable at TMZ doses less than half of the conventional dose of 200 mg/m2/d. Myelosuppression occurred sporadically at all dose levels and was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at 100 mg/m2/d of TMZ combined with 120 mg/m2/d O6BG. Nonhematologic toxicities were generally mild. Evidence of antitumor activity was observed at 120 mg/m2/d O6BG combined with TMZ doses of 55 mg/m2/d and above. CONCLUSION: The recommended doses of O6BG administered with TMZ on a 5-day schedule in children are 120 mg/m2/d of O6BG and 75 mg/m2/d of TMZ. Evidence of activity was observed at these doses. Myelosuppression was the DLT.     

Combined therapy with topotecan and gemcitabine in patients with inoperable or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I/II trial of topotecan combined with gemcitabine in patients with metastatic or unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) based on preclinical data showing in vitro synergy against an established lung adenocarcinoma cell line. The aim was to determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan when the gemcitabine dose is held constant, as well the dose limiting toxicity (DLTs) of this combination in NSCLC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were treated weekly times 3 with a week break with gemcitabine (1250 mg/m2 over 30 minutes) and topotecan (30 minutes) at varying doses. The starting dose of topotecan was 1.0 mg/m2 and doses were escalated in 0.25-mg/m2 increments until the MTD was achieved. RESULTS: The MTD of gemcitabine/topotecan was 1250 mg/m2 of gemcitabine and 2.00 mg/m2 of topotecan (level 5). Neutropenia was the DLT. Few nonhematologic toxicities were observed. There were 5 (21%) partial responses among 24 patients. The median survival was 22 weeks. Two patients have had prolonged (> 2 year) survival. CONCLUSION: The combination of gemcitabine and topotecan seems to be active against NSCLC with acceptable hematologic toxicity and minimal nonhematologic toxicity. The recommended dose for further study is 1250 mg/m2 of gemcitabine (days 1, 8, 15) and 2.0 mg/m2 of topotecan (days 1, 8, 15) administered every 28 days.     

Etoposide plus carboplatin admixture. Phase I study of five- or seven-day continuous infusion.

Thirty-five patients were entered in a Phase I trial of an admixture infusion of etoposide (VP-16) and carboplatin (CBDCA) administered continuously for 5 or 7 days. Because of the compatibility and solubility of the two agents, the treatment program could be administered on an outpatient basis. The dose rate of VP-16 was fixed at 30 mg/m2/day (total dose 150 mg/m2 for 5 days or 210 mg/m2 for seven days) for each cycle. Carboplatin was evaluated at three dose rates: 50, 60, and 75 mg/m2/day on the 5-day infusion and 40, 50, and 60 mg/m2/day on the 7-day infusion with cycles repeated at 28 to 42 days. The dose limiting toxicity was hematologic and followed a pattern typical for carboplatin, that is, delayed neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia with a protracted leukocyte recovery. Renal toxicity was observed in three patients. The optimum total dose for the infusional carboplatin component was 300 mg/m2 (5-day) and 420 mg/m2 (7-day). The total etoposide dose was 150 mg/M2 and 210 mg/M2, which did not appear to contribute to the hematologic toxicity. Delivery of the admixture of VP-16 and CBDCA was feasible, although cumbersome, as a result of the portable delivery system. Extending the duration of infusion increases the total cumulative dose of carboplatin and etoposide that can be administered without increasing adverse effects.     

Phase I trial and pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine in children with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine in children with refractory solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Gemcitabine was given as a 30-minute infusion for 2 or 3 consecutive weeks every 4 weeks, to 42 patients aged 1 to 21 years. Doses of 1000, 1200 and 1500 mg/m(2) were administered for 3 weeks. Subsequently, gemcitabine was given for only 2 consecutive weeks at 1500, 1800, and 2100 mg/m(2). Plasma concentrations of gemcitabine and its metabolite, 2'2'-difluorodeoxyuridine, were measured in 28 patients. RESULTS: Forty patients who received 132 courses of gemcitabine were assessable for toxicity. The maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine given weekly for 3 weeks was 1200 mg/m(2). Dose-limiting toxicity was not seen in one-third of children treated at any doses given for 2 weeks. The major toxicity was myelosuppression in three of five patients at 1500 mg/m(2) for 3 weeks, and one of seven patients at 1800 mg/m(2) for 2 weeks. Other serious adverse events were somnolence, fever and hypotension, and rash in three patients. Gemcitabine plasma concentration-time data were fit to a one- (n = 5) or two-compartment (n = 23) open model. Mean gemcitabine clearance and half-life values were 2140 mL/min/m(2) and 13.7 minutes, respectively. One patient with pancreatic cancer had a partial response. Seven patients had stable disease for 2 to 17 months. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine given by 30-minute infusion for 2 or 3 consecutive weeks every 4 weeks was tolerated well by children at doses of 2100 mg/m(2) and 1200 mg/m(2), respectively.     

Phase I chemotherapy study of biochemical modulation of folinic acid and fluorouracil by gemcitabine in patients with solid tumor malignancies.

PURPOSE: This phase I biochemical modulation study evaluated the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity, and effectiveness of the combination of folinic acid (FA)/fluorouracil (5-FU) followed by escalated dose levels of gemcitabine (FFG) in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were refractory to primary treatment and/or without effective treatment options. Twenty-eight patients received an intravenous (IV) infusion of FA 100 mg/m(2) over 1 hour and a 5-FU 450 mg/m(2) IV bolus in the middle of the FA infusion. After the FA infusion, gemcitabine was administered at a steady rate of infusion of 10 mg/m(2)/min over initially 30 minutes and with increases of an additional 15 minutes at each given level. One cycle consisted of six weekly treatments followed by a 2-week rest. RESULTS: The MTD of gemcitabine was established at 900 mg/m(2) given over 90 minutes. Eight patients of 21 with metastatic colorectal cancer achieved responses (one complete response; seven partial responses), for a response rate of 38%. Responses were seen across the gemcitabine doses of 300 to 900 mg/m(2). One patient had prior treatment with FA/5-FU for advanced disease. Patients with colorectal carcinoma had a median survival of 18 months, and the patient with lung carcinoma has been alive for 24+ months. CONCLUSION: The combination chemotherapy of FFG was well tolerated and may benefit patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. A phase II evaluation in this patient population is in progress.