Endoscopy of the terminal ileum

A prospective study was undertaken to investigate the feasibility and diagnostic yield of ileoscopy as an extension of total colonoscopy. The distal 15 to 40 cm of the terminal ileum were visualized in 400 of 555 consecutive patients submitted to total colonoscopy (72 percent). Intubation of the terminal ileum was not successful in 42 patients (8 percent), not tried in 63 (11 percent), and hampered by inadequate colonic cleansing in 50 (9 percent). We observed 13 patients with terminal ileitis and seven rare findings such as nonspecific ileal ulcer or non-Meckelian diverticulum, etc., adding to a total of 20 pathologic findings in 400 examinations (5 percent). In a further group of 98 patients, useful diagnostic information was gained by the demonstration of normal ileal findings, making ileoscopy clinically valuable in 118 of 400 examinations (29.5 percent) in this series. We suggest routine endoscopy of the terminal ileum in all patients with suspected or established inflammatory bowel disease and/or persistent diarrhea, lower gastrointestinal tract bleeding, or irritable bowel syndrome, in whom the diagnostic procedure includes colonoscopy. In patients with colorectal tumors or polyps, the diagnostic yield will be unrewarding.     

Diverticulitis of the terminal ileum

In the past two decades, several reports have documented inflammatory changes in acquired diverticula of the terminal ileum and their associated complications, namely, perforation, intestinal obstruction, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and fistulization. A comprehensive review revealed 28 cases of diverticulitis of the terminal ileum documented in the world medical literature. Only one case of internal fistula (ileovesical) has been reported previously. This report describes another patient with diverticulitis of the terminal ileum with associated perforation and jejunoileal fistula and reviews the world literature.     

Inflammatory disease of the terminal ileum

Digestive Diseases and Sciences -     

Histology of the terminal ileum in coeliac disease

BACKGROUND: The histological lesion of gluten sensitivity primarily affects the proximal small bowel. The purpose of this study was to assess whether there were features of gluten-sensitive enteropathy in biopsies taken from the terminal ileum during colonoscopy/ileoscopy. Specific and sensitive abnormalities might facilitate diagnosis of coeliac disease in patients undergoing colonoscopy as their initial procedure or help select those who should proceed to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and duodenal biopsy. METHODS: Terminal ileal biopsies, taken from 30 patients with duodenal villous atrophy consistent with coeliac disease and from 60 control patients with no evidence of coeliac or inflammatory bowel disease, were reviewed blindly and compared. Biopsies were assessed for the presence or absence of villous atrophy and crypt hyperplasia, and counts were made of intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs). RESULTS: One patient only, in the coeliac group, had partial villous atrophy with crypt hyperplasia in the terminal ileum. IEL counts were significantly higher (P< 0.005) in the coeliac group than among controls (mean per 100 enterocytes 26 versus 10). An ileal IEL count > or =25 had a sensitivity for duodenal villous atrophy (VA) of 60% and specificity of 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Coeliac disease may affect the entire small bowel. Increased IEL density in the terminal ileum is associated with duodenal VA and should prompt a search for coeliac disease by serology and duodenal biopsy. Conversely, a normal IEL count does not allow the exclusion of coeliac disease with confidence.     

Histology of the terminal ileum in coeliac disease

Background: The histological lesion of gluten sensitivity primarily affects the proximal small bowel. The purpose of this study was to assess whether there were features of gluten‐sensitive enteropathy in biopsies taken from the terminal ileum during colonoscopy/ileoscopy. Specific and sensitive abnormalities might facilitate diagnosis of coeliac disease in patients undergoing colonoscopy as their initial procedure or help select those who should proceed to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and duodenal biopsy. Methods: Terminal ileal biopsies, taken from 30 patients with duodenal villous atrophy consistent with coeliac disease and from 60 control patients with no evidence of coeliac or inflammatory bowel disease, were reviewed blindly and compared. Biopsies were assessed for the presence or absence of villous atrophy and crypt hyperplasia, and counts were made of intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs). Results: One patient only, in the coeliac group, had partial villous atrophy with crypt hyperplasia in the terminal ileum. IEL counts were significantly higher (P?Conclusions: Coeliac disease may affect the entire small bowel. Increased IEL density in the terminal ileum is associated with duodenal VA and should prompt a search for coeliac disease by serology and duodenal biopsy. Conversely, a normal IEL count does not allow the exclusion of coeliac disease with confidence.