Genomic alterations and phenotype of large compared to small high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ

A clinically distinct subgroup of pure ductal carcinoma in situ presents as an extensive, high-grade lesion, which nevertheless lacks invasion. We sought to evaluate differences between those ductal carcinomas in situ presenting as large versus small lesions while controlling for high-grade, to determine whether there exist phenotypic and genetic differences between the 2 groups. Fifty-two cases of pure high-grade ductal carcinomas in situ were collected retrospectively, consisting of 27 large (>40 mm) and 25 small (<15 mm) cases. The 2 groups were compared based on genomic copy number assessed by array-based comparative genomic hybridization and by phenotype determined by immunohistochemistry for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, Ki-67, p53, cyclin D1, p16, cyclooxygenase 2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, and CD68. Large lesions presented at a younger age, with lower incidence of comedonecrosis and periductal macrophage response. Larger lesions also had significantly lower estrogen receptor expression, lower cyclin D1 expression, and lower Ki-67 index. The subset of 9 large palpable tumors had significantly lower p16/cyclooxygenase 2 expression and lower Ki-67 index compared to nonpalpable tumors. Genomically, larger lesions had fewer break points, fewer amplifications, and decreased copy number gains involving chromosome 8q and chromosome 20q when compared to the small lesions. Among pure high-grade tumors, small and large groups show specific genomic and phenotypic differences. Interestingly, larger tumors showed some molecular features associated with better prognosis. A more thorough evaluation of these differences could help identify the likelihood of recurrence or progression for in situ lesions.     

Cytologic features of ductal carcinoma in situ

Fourteen cases of both palpable and non-palpable breast lesions reported as possible ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) on fine-needle biopsy (FNB) over a 12-mo period were retrieved from our files and compared to the subsequent histologic diagnosis. Although a definite cytologic pattern of highly cellular smears with high grade nuclei, dissociation, and background necrosis with microcalcifications emerged for comedo DCIS, it was not possible to differentiate these on cytologic grounds from high grade infiltrating carcinoma with necrosis unless mammographic findings were taken into account. Useful criteria for non-comedo low grade DCIS were high cellularity, low grade nuclei, and architectural features of papillary and three dimensional (3D) fragments, palisade arrangements, and monolayer sheets with punched out glandular lumina. We conclude that FNB has a definite role in the diagnosis of these lesions, with the limitation that invasive malignancy can never be excluded on cytologic criteria alone and clinico-radiological correlation is paramount. Diagn Cytopathol 1996;15:367–373. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Metastatic breast carcinoma with appearance resembling micropapillary ductal carcinoma in situ.

AIM--To investigate tumour in an axillary lymph node resembling micropapillary ductal carcinoma in situ. METHODS--Sections of tumour in the breast and axillary lymph node were stained with haematoxylin and eosin, and immunohistochemically with antibodies to basement membrane and myoepithelial cells. RESULTS--Tumour in both the breast and axillary lymph node contained areas resembling micropapillary ductal carcinoma in situ. Surrounding these islands, there was a band of eosinophilic material resembling basement membrane and spindle cells that in places appeared to lie outside the basement membrane. Micropapillary tumour at both sites showed weak and discontinuous staining for collagen IV and laminin. The spindle cells stained for alpha-smooth muscle actin, but not for S100. By contrast, immunohistochemistry showed complete rings of basement membrane and myoepithelial cells around definite ductal carcinoma in situ and normal breast lobules and ducts. CONCLUSIONS--Invasive primary and metastatic carcinoma of the breast can have a growth pattern resembling micropapillary ductal carcinoma in situ.     

CD24 expression in ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma of breast: an immunohistochemistry-based pilot study

CD24 is a small, heavily glycosylated cell surface protein, that is expressed in a large variety of solid tumors. It is considered to play an important role in tumor progression and metastasis. We aimed to evaluate CD24 expression in invasive ductal carcinomas (IDCa), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and non-tumorous breast tissues, and to investigate the relationship between histopathological parameters, estrogen and progesterone receptors, and c-erbB2 expressions. The study included 34 IDCa, 25 DCIS, and 13 non-tumorous breast tissues. All cases were reevaluated histopathologically, and immunohistochemistry was performed with monoclonal CD24 antibody. The results clearly demonstrated that CD24 expression, including membranous and cytoplasmic staining, was significantly higher in DCIS and IDCa than in the non-tumorous breast (p=0.001, p=0.000, and p=0.035, p=0.000, respectively). Cytoplasmic staining was detected predominantly in neoplastic tissues and was significantly increased in high grade DCIS (p=0.013). In invasive carcinomas, although the level of membranous staining was significantly positively correlated with tumor grade (p=0.040), there was no such an association with the cytoplasmic level. However, it showed a trend towards pT (p=0.089). In conclusion, our results suggest that higher CD24 expression may be associated with malignant transformation and progression in breast cancer biology. Furthermore, higher membranous expression and, in particular, cytoplasmic staining seem to predict malignant transformation, and different patterns of CD24 expression may be associated with different pathological features in breast tumors.     

Genetic relation of lobular carcinoma in situ, ductal carcinoma in situ, and associated invasive carcinoma of the breast.

AIMS: The mutual relation of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast, as accepted precursor lesions of invasive breast cancer, is controversial. Because they display genetic heterogeneity, it is not clear how genetically advanced these entities are and what causes the transition to an invasive carcinoma. METHODS: Six cases of LCIS, four of them with associated lobular invasive carcinoma, four cases of intermediately differentiated DCIS with an associated invasive lobular carcinoma, and nine cases of intermediately and poorly differentiated DCIS with associated ductal invasive carcinoma were investigated by means of comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) after microdissection and immunohistochemical staining of E-cadherin. RESULTS: LCIS was characterised by a low average rate of copy number changes, no evidence of amplifications, and a high rate of gains and losses of chromosomal material at 1q and 16q, respectively. A high degree of genetic homology with well differentiated DCIS was obvious, as reported previously. The cases of intermediately differentiated DCIS with associated lobular invasive components and lobular differentiation revealed striking homologies, and a significant difference of E-cadherin expression. The comparison of preinvasive and invasive breast lesions, irrespective of differentiation within the same patient, revealed no specific alteration that might be associated with invasion. Genetic alterations seen in invasive carcinoma were not necessarily seen in the adjacent precursor lesions. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide strong evidence that invasive breast cancer is a disease with multiple cytogenetic subclones already present in preinvasive lesions. Moreover, specific CGH alterations associated with invasion were not observed. Furthermore, the close genetic association between well differentiated and a subgroup of intermediately differentiated DCIS and LCIS led to the hypothesis that LCIS and a subgroup of DCIS are different phenotypic forms of a common genotype.     

Histological margin assessment for breast ductal carcinoma in situ: precision and implications.

Local recurrence after lumpectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a major concern and is related to residual disease in the breast. We studied the predictive value of lumpectomy margins for residual DCIS and compared our results and pathological processing techniques with those published in the literature. Margin status was determined for 89 patients with screen-detected DCIS who had lumpectomy and re-excision, for the presence and extent of residual disease. Margin width was defined as the narrowest distance between tumor and any inked margin or, where margins were positive, classified into focal involvement (<1 mm of the inked surface involved), minimal (>or=1<15 mm) and extensive (>or=15 mm). The amount of residual tumor was quantified according to the number of ducts involved with tumor: small (fewer than 10 ducts) or large (10 or more ducts) residuum. The initial margin status was a significant predictor for the presence of residual tumor in re-excision specimens (P=0.006). There was residual tumor in 44 and 45% of close non-involved (>1 and 25 mm,respectively, showing residual disease. The presence of residual tumor was not significantly related to age, mammographic appearance, nuclear grade or intraductal necrosis. The initial margin status was found to predict for the amount of residual tumor. With careful margin assessment, margin status after lumpectomy for DCIS can be used to predict for the presence and amount of residual tumor in the breast and is a guide to further management decisions. A standard for margin status reporting and pathological processing of screen-detected DCIS in situ lesions will help in the interpretation of data from different institutions.     

Cytological and architectural heterogeneity in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

AIM: The traditional architecture based classification system of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has been criticised on the grounds that individual lesions often show more than one pattern resulting in a large mixed category. New DCIS classification systems have emphasised the importance of cytological grade, which is reputed to be more uniformly expressed throughout a lesion. This study investigates the hypothesis that cytological heterogeneity is less common than architectural heterogeneity within DCIS lesions. METHODS: 121 cases of DCIS were graded as poorly, intermediately, or well differentiated according to a recently developed classification system that employs cytonuclear morphology as the major diagnostic criterion. Cases were categorised as pure when only one grade was present and as mixed if more than one grade was observed. Architecturally the cases were classified as solid, cribriform, micropapillary, or papillary and were described as pure if only one architectural pattern was present and as mixed if more than one pattern was seen. The incidence of cytological heterogeneity was compared with that of architectural heterogeneity. The presence of necrosis was assessed as an independent parameter and the relation to DCIS grade evaluated. RESULTS: Using the cytology based classification system 102 cases (84%) were classified as pure (65 poorly differentiated, 25 intermediately differentiated, and 12 well differentiated) and 19 cases (16%) as mixed. Extensive necrosis was observed in 61 (50%) cases and was closely correlated to DCIS grade. Architecturally 46 cases (38%) were classified as pure (38 solid, 5 cribriform, 2 micropapillary, and 1 papillary) and 75 (62%) as mixed. CONCLUSIONS: Cytological heterogeneity is much less common than architectural heterogeneity in DCIS lesions. The assessment of cytonuclear morphology is therefore likely to provide more consistent information about DCIS, particularly in small biopsy specimens where only part of the lesion may be available for examination.     

Cystosarcoma phylloides with lobular and ductal carcinoma in situ

Malignant change of the epithelium in cystosarcoma phylloides is a rare occurrence, the most frequent occurrence being infiltrating carcinoma of various types and lobular carcinoma in situ, while ductal carcinoma in situ is much more rare. We describe a case of lobular and ductal carcinoma in situ in the same case of cystosarcoma phylloides.     

Mathematical modelling of comedo ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

The growth of a tumour in a cylindrical duct with compliant walls is examined in order to model the early stages of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast, the earliest known stage of breast cancer. A nutrient-limited growth model is formulated, in which cell movement is described by a Stokes flow constitutive relation. The interactions between the expansive forces created by tumour cell proliferation and the stresses that develop in the compliant basement membrane are studied using asymptotic and numerical methods. In this way we show how the duct wall deforms as the tumour grows and also how the progression of the tumour along the duct depends upon the stiffness of the wall. By varying key parameters we determine how treatment, protease production and the inclusion of the surrounding stroma affect the growth. Finally, we discuss the biological relevance of our results and suggest possible directions for future work.     

Expression of cyclins in ductal hyperplasia, atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

Cyclin/cdc complexes are known to function in cell-cycle regulation. Cyclin D1/cdk4 and -6 complexes, which functions as a G1-S checkpoint and cyclin B1/cdc2 complexes, a G2-M checkpoint are essential for DNA synthesis and mitosis, respectively. Thus, dysregulated overexpression of cyclins appears to be involved in uncontrollable cell proliferation and early tumor development. We investigated the expression and proliferative index of cyclin D1 (PIcyclin D1), cyclin B1 (PIcyclin B1) and Ki-67 (PIKi-67) using immunohistochemical staining on 15 cases of ductal hyperplasia (DH), 26 cases of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) and 43 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast in order to evaluate whether these cyclins are associated with abnormal cell proliferation and play a role in tumor development from ADH to carcinoma. Furthermore, we investigated whether the expression and proliferative index of the cyclins and Ki-67 are correlated with the histologic grade according to the Van Nuys classification and with the histologic subtype according to traditional classification. Finally, we estimated the correlation coefficient among PIcyclin D1, PIcyclin B1, PIKi-67 and estrogen receptor in ADH and DCIS. The expression of cyclin D1 was detected in 39.5% of DCIS and 7.7% of ADH cases. In the DH cases, expression of cyclin D1 was not found. Expression of cyclin B1 was also detected in 69.7% of DCIS, 50.0% of ADH and 93.3% of the DH cases. The PIcyclin D1 was significantly different among these three groups. Moreover, the PIcyclin D1 and PIKi-67 were differed significantly between the low grade DCIS and ADH cases. However, PIcyclin B1 only appeared to be significantly different between the total DCIS and ADH. Results of the correlation coefficient among PIcyclin D1, PIcyclin B1 and PIKi-67 were positively correlated with each other. No significant correlation was found between the expression of ER and cyclin D1 in ADH and DCIS. In summary, our results support the hypothesis that a cyclin D1 and cyclin B1 protein aberration, along with Ki-67, may act as a relatively early event in the tumor development from ADH to carcinoma.     

乳腺导管内癌分子分型应用研究

目的 采用免疫组织化学检测方法 对乳腺导管内癌进行分子分型.方法 收集50例乳腺导管内癌存档蜡块,用单克隆抗体CK5/6、CK8、CK18、34βE12、p63、S-100、SMA、CD10、CD117、EGFR、ER、PR和HER2进行免疫组织化学EnVision法染色,按照免疫表型分为5种类型:腺腔A型(ER+/PR+/HER2-)、腺腔B型(ER+/PR+/HER2+)、正常乳腺样型(ER-/PR-/HER2-且不表达基底/肌上皮标记及EGFR)、HER2过表达型(ER-/PR-/HER2+)和基底细胞样型(ER-/PR-/HER2-,且至少表达一种基底型角蛋白和(或)肌上皮标记物或EGFR).结果 腺腔A型16例(32%),腺腔B型19例(38%),HER2过表达型13例(26%),基底细胞样型2例(4%),无正常乳腺型.2例基底细胞样型,均表达CK5/6、CD117,例1同时表达SMA,例2表达CK8、CK18、34βE12、S-100,均为高级别导管内癌.结论 乳腺导管内癌可按免疫表型进行分子分型,部分导管内癌具有与基底细胞样癌相同的免疫表型,可能是基底细胞样癌的前驱病变,其诊断依赖于免疫组化检测.     

Endocrine variant of ductal carcinoma in situ of breast: ultrastructural and light microscopical study.

The ultrastructural and light microscopic presentation of the recently described entity of the in situ endocrine variant of ductal carcinoma of breast are presented.     

Comparative features of ductal carcinoma in situ and infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast on fine-needle aspiration biopsy

To evaluate the usefulness of fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the breast in separating ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) from infiltrating ductal carcinoma, the authors reviewed 16 preoperative fine-needle aspiration biopsies from biopsy-proven exclusive DCIS and 39 fine-needle aspiration biopsies from infiltrating ductal carcinomas with or without an in situ component. Seven (44%) of the DCIS and eight (21%) of the infiltrating ductal carcinomas had inadequate material for diagnosis on the aspiration biopsy. Five (32%) of the DCIS and 29 (74%) of the infiltrating ductal carcinomas caused suspicion or had positive results for malignancy. Four (25%) of the DCIS and two (5%) of the infiltrating ductal carcinomas showed atypical cells. Morphologic features of the atypical or malignant cells in the adequate specimens from these two lesions were similar except that the cells from the infiltrating ductal carcinomas showed more irregular nuclear spacing (94% vs. 44%, P less than 0.01) and more pronounced nuclear overlapping (65% vs. 33%) than those from the DCIS. In addition, the fine-needle aspiration biopsies of the DCIS tended to be hypocellular (less than 10 cells/10X) (44% vs. 6.5%, P less than 0.05) and to contain benign epithelial cells (22% vs. 6.5%) and macrophages (33% vs. 13%). Although the suspicion of DCIS might be raised when hypocellularity, benign epithelial cells, and macrophages are noted in a fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the breast that has positive results or causes suspicion for malignancy, fine-needle aspiration biopsy cannot be relied upon to distinguish DCIS from infiltrating ductal carcinoma.     

Cyclin D1 expression in ductal carcinoma in situ, atypical ductal hyperplasia and usual ductal hyperplasia: an immunohistochemical study

The cell cycle regulatory gene, Cyclin D1, plays a critical role in the growth and progression of several types of human cancer, including breast cancer. Immunohistochemical study of Cyclin D1 expression has been extensively reported in invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). In contrast, there have been few reports concerning Cyclin D1 expression in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and their positive rates are variable. The differences in the reported frequency may be largely due to the differences in antibodies used, immunohistochemical methods and the positive cut-off point. However, we speculated that the strictness of diagnosis of DCIS might be somewhat responsible for these differences in frequency. Therefore, we selected cases of DCIS by carefully eliminating cases of predominantly intraductal carcinoma (PIC). Moreover, to clarify whether Cyclin D1 expression is involved in multistep carcinogenesis or the progression of human breast cancer, we immunohistochemically investigated Cyclin D1 expression in 57 DCIS, 10 atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), 70 usual ductal hyperplasia (UDH), 44 PIC and 92 IDC. Cyclin D1 expression was detected in 41 DCIS cases (72%), 22 PIC cases (50%) and 40 IDC cases (43%). No expression of Cyclin D1 was observed in either ADH or UDH. There were no significant correlations between Cyclin D1 expression and histological grade or estrogen receptor expression in DCIS. These results suggest that Cyclin D1 expression may play an important role in the early stages of carcinogenesis, and that immunohistochemical detection of Cyclin D1 expression may be helpful in differentiating low-grade DCIS from ADH.