Acute protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction by formoterol, salmeterol and terbutaline.

The onset of bronchoprotection as obtained by various beta2-agonists has not been examined in a comparitive study. In this study, the onset of bronchodilation and protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatics after inhalation of the long-acting beta2-agonists formoterol and salmeterol and the short-acting beta2-agonist terbutaline were measured. Twenty-five subjects with asthma and a history of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (mean baseline forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1): 90% predicted; mean fall in FEV1 after exercise: 31% from baseline) were enrolled in this double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, randomized, four-period crossover study. Exercise challenges were performed on 12 days at either 5, 30, or 60 min after inhalation of a single dose of formoterol (12 microg Turbuhaler), salmeterol (50 microg Diskus), terbutaline (500 microg Turbuhaler) or placebo. Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (maximum fall in FEV1 or area under the curve) did not differ significantly between terbutaline, formorerol and salmeterol either 5, 30, or 60 min after inhalation of the study medication. In contrast, the onset of bronchodilation was slower after salmeterol compared to terbutaline and formoterol (p<0.05, each), which both showed a similar time course. At all time points between 5 and 60 min, formoterol provided significantly greater bronchodilation than salmeterol (p<0.05). These data indicate that equipotent doses of the bronchodilators salmeterol, formoterol and terbutaline were similarly effective with respect to their short-term protective potency against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, despite the fact that the time course of bronchodilation was significantly different between the three beta2-agonists.     

Prophylaxis of exercise-induced asthma with inhaled formoterol, a long-acting beta 2-adrenergic agonist

The prophylaxis of exercise-induced asthma with inhaled formoterol (12 micrograms) was compared with inhaled salbutamol (200 micrograms) and placebo in 12 patients with atopic asthma. Both drugs produced equal bronchodilation 2 and 4 h after administration. Both drugs protected equally against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction 2 h after administration; at 4 h, formoterol gave undiminished protection from that seen at 2 h while salbutamol was no more effective than placebo.     

Prevention of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction by inhaled low-molecular-weight heparin.

Because many biological actions of heparin including the antiallergic activity are molecular weight dependent, we hypothesized that low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) may have greater potency in attenuating exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). Therefore, in the present investigation we studied the effects of inhaled LMWH, enoxaparin, and unfractionated heparin on EIB in subjects with asthma. Thirteen asthmatic subjects performed a standardized exercise challenge on a treadmill to document the presence of EIB. The workload was increased until 85% of predicted maximal heart rate was achieved, and the exercise was sustained at that workload for 10 min. EIB was assessed by measuring FEV(1) before and immediately after the exercise. On five different experiment days the subjects were pretreated with 4 ml of aerosolized heparin (80,000 units = 7.5 mg/kg), placebo, or 3 different doses of enoxaparin (0.5 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg, 2 mg/kg) in a double-blind, randomized, crossover design, and exercise challenge was performed 45 min later. Bronchial provocation with methacholine was also performed in five subjects on two additional days after pretreatment with either placebo or inhaled enoxaparin (2 mg/kg), and venous blood was obtained for analysis of plasma antifactor Xa. Postexercise, the maximal decreases in FEV(1) (mean +/- SE) were 30 +/- 4% and 29 +/- 5% on control and placebo days. The exercise-induced decreases in FEV(1) were inhibited by 31% with heparin (DeltaFEV(1) = 20 +/- 4%); and by 28%, 38%, and 48% by enoxaparin at doses of 0.5 mg/kg (DeltaFEV(1) = 21 +/- 5%), 1 mg/kg (DeltaFEV(1) = 18 +/- 5%), and 2 mg/kg (DeltaFEV(1) = 15 +/- 3%), respectively (p < 0.05). The inhibitory effect of 0.5 mg/kg dose of enoxaparin was comparable to heparin (7.5 mg/kg), whereas 2 mg/ kg dose of enoxaparin was the most potent. Inhaled enoxaparin failed to modify the bronchoconstrictor response to methacholine, and did not change the plasma antifactor Xa activity. These data demonstrate that inhaled enoxaparin prevents EIB in a dose-dependent manner; and its antiasthmatic activity is independent of its effect on plasma antifactor Xa activity.     

Adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction in asthma. Antagonism by inhaled theophylline

Inhaled adenosine causes bronchoconstriction in asthmatic patients. Antagonism of the bronchoconstrictor effect of endogenous adenosine has been proposed as a possible mechanism of action of theophylline in asthma. To directly investigate this, we have compared the airway responses to inhaled adenosine and histamine, with and without the prior administration of inhaled theophylline in 8 allergic asthmatic subjects. Airway response was measured both as forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and as specific airway conductance (SGaw). Inhaled adenosine was less potent than histamine in producing bronchoconstriction, with geometric mean concentrations required to produce a 20% fall of FEV1 (PCf20) and a 40% fall of SGaw (PCs40) being 0.27 and 0.25 mg/ml for adenosine and 0.10 and 0.09 mg/ml for histamine. In a total nebulized dose of 37.5 mg, inhaled theophylline was a weak bronchodilator that caused maximal increases in FEV1 of 2 +/- 2% (mean +/- SE, p less than 0.05) and in SGaw of 8 +/- 4% (p greater than 0.05). However, theophylline significantly inhibited adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction, increasing the PCf20 and PCs40 values for adenosine to 1.66 (p less than 0.001) and 2.34 (p less than 0.005) mg/ml, respectively. Inhibition of histamine-induced bronchoconstriction was less marked, with PCf20 and PCs40 values of 0.19 (p greater than 0.05) and 0.21 (p less than 0.05) mg/ml. Thus, adenosine is a bronchoconstrictor in asthma whose effects are preferentially antagonized by concentrations of theophylline that cause little change in baseline airway caliber.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Eosinophils play a major role in the severity of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in children with asthma

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) was associated with eosinophilic airway inflammation, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), atopy and airway obstruction. To understand the pathogenesis of EIB, we determine whether eosinophil is more related to the mechanism of EIB than atopy, BHR and airway obstruction. This study comprised 268 asthmatic children who underwent lung function test, methacholine challenge test, exercise challenge test, and blood tests for total IgE levels and total eosinophil counts (TEC). Urine eosinophil protein X (EPX) levels after exercise were measured by using ELISA method. EIB was observed in 195 of 268 asthmatics (72.8%). Asthmatics with EIB showed significantly increased TEC (P < 0.01) and decreased log PC(20) as compared with asthmatics without EIB. Maximal percent fall in FEV(1) after exercise was significantly correlated with TEC, log IgE, FEF(25-75%), log PC(20) (P < 0.001, respectively) and FEV(1) (P = 0.013). When the same study was carried out in nonatopic asthmatics, those with EIB showed significantly increased TEC (P = 0.01) compared with those without EIB; however, log PC(20), FEV(1), and FEF(25-75%) showed no significant differences between the two groups of nonatopic asthmatics. In addition, there was a significant correlation between the severity of EIB and TEC in nonatopic asthmatics. Urine EPX/Cr levels after exercise were correlated with the severity of EIB (r = 0.238, P = 0.014). Blood eosinophils and urine EPX/Cr after exercise correlate significantly with the maximal percent fall in FEV(1) after exercise, therefore EIB may reflect a state of eosinophilic inflammation in the airway of asthmatic children.     

An update on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction with and without asthma

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is defined as transient, reversible bronchoconstriction that develops after strenuous exercise. It is a heterogeneous syndrome made up of a spectrum of phenotypes ranging from the asymptomatic military recruit whose condition is detected by diagnostic exercise challenge to the athlete with known asthma to the elite athlete for whom EIB represents an overuse or injury syndrome. If exercise is the only identified trigger for bronchoconstriction, it is called EIB. However, when it is associated with known asthma, then it is defined as EIB with asthma. This review discusses the pathogenesis, presentation, diagnosis, and management of EIB and EIB with asthma.     

Ascorbic acid supplementation attenuates exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in patients with asthma

BACKGROUND: Previous research has shown that diet can modify the bronchoconstrictor response to exercise in asthmatic subjects. OBJECTIVE: Determine the effect of ascorbic acid supplementation on pulmonary function and several urinary markers of airway inflammation in asthmatic subjects with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). METHODS: Eight asthmatic subjects with documented EIB participated in a randomized, placebo controlled double-blind crossover trial. Subjects entered the study on their usual diet and were placed on either 2 weeks of ascorbic acid supplementation (1500 mg/day) or placebo, followed by a 1-week washout period, before crossing over to the alternative diet. Pre- and post-exercise pulmonary function, asthma symptom scores, fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO), and urinary leukotriene (LT) C4-E4 and 9alpha, 11beta-prostagladin (PG) F2] were assessed at the beginning of the trial (usual diet) and at the end of each treatment period. Results: The ascorbic acid diet significantly reduced (p < 0.05) the maximum fall in post-exercise FEV1 (-6.4 +/- 2.4%) compared to usual (-14.3 +/- 1.6%) and placebo diet (-12.9 +/- 2.4%). Asthma symptoms scores significantly improved (p<0.05) on the ascorbic acid diet compared to the placebo and usual diet. Post-exercise FENO, LTC4-E4 and 9alpha, 11beta-PGF2 concentration was significantly lower (p<0.05) on the ascorbic acid diet compared to the placebo and usual diet. CONCLUSION: Ascorbic acid supplementation provides a protective effect against exercise-induced airway narrowing in asthmatic subjects.     

Inhaled hyaluronic acid against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in asthma

Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a polysaccharide that is present in human tissues and body fluids. HA has various functions, including a barrier effect, water homeostasis, stabilizing the extracellular matrix, increased mucociliary clearance and elastin injury prevention. It may therefore exert prophylactic activity in the treatment of asthma. We tested the hypothesis that HA inhalation will prevent exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in a randomised double-blinded placebo-controlled crossover study. Sixteen asthmatic patients with EIB were included in the study (mean (SD)) (age 24.5 (7.3) yr, FEV1 88.6 (11.3) %predicted, PC20 methacholine (g-mean (SD in DD)) 0.4 (1.5) mg/ml). On two separate visits an exercise challenge was performed 15 min post-inhalation of either HA (3 ml 0.1% in PBS) or placebo (3 ml PBS). The maximum fall in FEV1 and the AUC 30 min post-exercise were used as outcomes. After inhalation of both HA and placebo, baseline FEV1 decreased significantly (HA 4.1 (3.1)%, placebo 2.9 (4.1)%, P<0.017). The maximum fall in FEV1 following exercise challenge was not significantly different between HA versus placebo (median HA 22.50%, placebo 27.20%, P=0.379), as was the AUC (median HA 379.3 min*%fall, placebo 498.9 min*%fall, P=0.501). We conclude that at the current dose, inhaled HA does not significantly protect against EIB. This suggests that HA is not effective as a prophylaxis for EIB in patients with asthma.     

Effects of inhaled budesonide alone and in combination with low-dose terbutaline in children with exercise-induced asthma

The effect of aerosolized terbutaline in a dose of 32.5 micrograms and its placebo, administered in a double-blind fashion, was studied in 14 children with exercise-induced asthma (EIA) before and during a 4-wk treatment period with aerosolized steroid (budesonide, 400 micrograms/day). Effects were assessed from the changes in peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and forced expiratory flow (FEF25-75) before and after treadmill exercise challenge. Compared with placebo there was a significant improvement in pulmonary function after terbutaline. During budesonide therapy, pulmonary function improved further, but there was no enhancement of the response to terbutaline. Terbutaline alone, budesonide plus placebo, and budesonide plus terbutaline reduced the exercise-induced fall in FEV1 by 30, 51, and 84%, respectively. The effect of budesonide on EIA was delayed during the 4 wk of treatment as compared with the improvement in resting pulmonary function. The present results suggest that 1 to 4 wk of therapy with inhaled corticosteroids decreases the severity of EIA. Further, the combined effect of inhaled corticosteroid and beta-2 agonist on pulmonary function appears to be additive.     

Efficacy and safety of formoterol Turbuhaler when added to inhaled corticosteroid treatment in children with asthma

This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study was conducted in 302 children aged 6-11 years with asthma not optimally treated with inhaled corticosteroids alone. Patients continued with their existing dose of inhaled corticosteroids and in addition received placebo, formoterol 4.5 microg or formoterol 9 microg b.i.d., for 12 weeks (all delivered via Turbuhaler). Terbutaline was available as reliever medication. The primary efficacy variable was change from baseline in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF); secondary efficacy variables included forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV(1)), serial PEF measured over 12 hr, evening PEF, asthma symptom score, and quality of life. Compared with placebo, formoterol 4.5 microg and 9 microg improved morning PEF by 8 l/min (P = 0.035) and 11 l/min (P = 0.0045), respectively. Evening PEF and FEV(1) were also significantly increased compared with placebo, with no statistically significant difference between formoterol doses. Lung-function improvements compared with placebo were greater in the middle of the day. Twelve-hour average serial PEF after 3 months increased by 24 l/min (95% CI, 9, 39 l/min) in the formoterol 9-microg group, and by 14 l/min (95% CI, 0, 29 l/min) in the formoterol 4.5-microg group. The incidence of severe exacerbations in both formoterol groups was numerically lower than in the placebo group, indicating that formoterol may have the potential to improve exacerbation control in children. Both formoterol doses were well-tolerated, and tolerance to the drug's bronchodilator effect was not observed. Formoterol provided sustained improvements in lung function and was well-tolerated in children with asthma suboptimally treated with inhaled corticosteroids alone.     

Geographic variation in inhaled corticosteroid use for children with persistent asthma in Medicaid

Objective: Geographic variation in the rates of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use for children with persistent asthma in Medicaid has been reported, but the source of this variation is unknown. The objective of this study was to quantify the geographic variation in ICS use for children with persistent asthma in Medicaid that remains after adjusting for the characteristics of children in an area. Methods: Data from the 2005–2007 Medicaid Analytic eXtract files were used. Frequent fills of short-acting beta₂-agonist (SABA) were used to identify children 5–18 years of age with persistent asthma across the United States. A child was considered to have used an ICS if the child initially filled an ICS following frequent SABA use. Areas were determined using published methods, and the unadjusted ICS rate and the area treatment ratio for ICS, which adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics, were calculated for each area. Results: Of 15,917 children, 13% used an ICS. The median unadjusted ICS rate for all areas was 10% but ranged from 0% to 64%. ICS use was less than expected for more than half of the areas based on the characteristics of the children in the area, but use was nearly five times what was expected in some areas. Areas with higher than expected ICS use were found contiguous to areas with lower than expected use. Conclusions: Geographic variation in ICS not attributable to the demographic and clinical characteristics of the children in an area exists and could prove useful in the struggle to reduce asthma exacerbation rates.     

Inhibition of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction by nebulised sodium cromoglycate in patients with bronchial asthma.

In this double blind study, 10 patients with bronchial asthma underwent exercise challenge on five occasions. The first of these was a control test carried out without prior drug administration; the other tests were preceded by the administration, in random order, of a sodium cromoglycate (SCG) capsule, a placebo capsule, an ampoule of sodium cromoglycate solution, and a placebo ampoule. Comparisons of the largest falls in PEFR after exercise showed statistically significant inhibition of exercise-induced bronchospasm, compared with control, with both SCG inhalation solution (P less than 0.01) and SCG powder (P less than 0.01). SCG powder was more active, but the difference was not significant. A significant difference in protection was found between SCG powder and its placebo (P less than 0.01). SCG inhalation solution was also more effective than its placebo, but the difference did not reach significance, since the latter conferred some protection.     

Prolonged effect of montelukast in asthmatic children with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

Accumulating evidence shows that cysteinyl leukotrienes are the most important mediators in exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). In contrast to several studies in adults, there are few long-term studies of leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) in children with EIB. The aim of this study was to assess the prolonged clinical and bronchoprotective effects of montelukast in asthmatic children with EIB. We randomly assigned 64 asthmatic children with EIB. Forty subjects received montelukast (5 mg/day), and 24 subjects received placebo once daily for 8 weeks. Exercise challenge was performed before and after 8 weeks of treatment. Of the 40 patients in the montelukast group, 28 patients crossed over after 8 weeks. The response was measured as asthma symptom score, maximum percent fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV(1)) from pre-exercise baseline, and time to recovery of FEV(1) to within 10% of pre-exercise baseline (time to recovery). Following 8 weeks of treatment with montelukast, the montelukast group compared with placebo showed significant improvements in all endpoints, including asthma symptom score, maximum percent fall in FEV(1) after exercise, and time to recovery. In the cross-over group, even 8 weeks after stopping montelukast treatment, all endpoints were significantly and persistently improved. These results indicate that montelukast provides clinical protection from airway hyperresponsiveness in asthmatic children with EIB, and suggest that LTRAs may be useful for the long-term management of asthmatic children with EIB.     

Determinants of the severity of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in patients with asthma.

AIM: In examining the mechanisms of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB), it is important to determine which factors most strongly affect the severity of EIB. We determined such factors in patients with asthma by stepwise multiple-regression analysis. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with asthma underwent pulmonary function tests, methacholine provocation test, and sputum induction. Eosinophilic inflammatory indices and airway vascular permeability index (ratio of albumin concentrations in induced sputum and serum) were examined in sputum samples, and then an exercise test was performed by all asthmatics. RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between the severity of EIB and degree of eosinophilic inflammation in induced sputum. Moreover, there was a significant correlation between the severity of EIB and airway vascular permeability index. Although we could not find a significant correlation between the severity of EIB and 1-sec forced expired volume, 20% provocation concentration of (PC20) methacholine tended to be correlated with the severity of EIB. By stepwise multiple-regression analysis, we also found that airway vascular permeability index, eosinophil cationic protein levels in sputum, and PC20 methacholine are independent predictors of the severity of EIB. CONCLUSION: We found that airway vascular hyperpermeability, eosinophilic inflammation, and bronchial hyperreactivity are independent factors predicting the severity of EIB.     

Effects of inhaled lidocaine on exercise-induced asthma

Experiments were performed to determine if stimulation of afferent nerve endings in the respiratory mucosa plays a major role in the initiation of exercise-induced asthma. Five asthmatic subjects were studied in two sessions of 10 min treadmill exercise using an identical workload. In the control session the subjects were exercised without treatment; in the other session aerosol lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg) was inhaled from residual volume to total lung capacity before exercise was started. Pulmonary function tests were measured (1) to obtain baseline values before the aerosol inhalation or exercise was commenced, (2) 2-3 min after completion of lidocaine inhalation, and (3) 4 min after termination of exercise. In the control session the mean postexercise forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and the mean forced expiratory flow during the middle half of forced vital capacity (FEF25-75%) were decreased to 61 and 44% of the baseline values, respectively. Similarly, with the lidocaine treatment the post-exercise FEV1 and FEF25-75% were decreased to 54 and 44% of the baseline values, respectively. These data indicate that the afferent nerves in the respiratory mucosa may not play a critical role in the development of exercise-induced asthma.     

Dose-responses over time to inhaled fluticasone propionate treatment of exercise- and methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction in children with asthma

When treating bronchial hyperresponsiveness to so-called direct and indirect stimuli, distinct pathophysiological mechanisms might require differences in dose and duration of inhaled corticosteroid therapy. To test this hypothesis in children with asthma, we investigated the time- and dose-dependent effects of 2 doses of fluticasone propionate (FP, 100 or 250 microg bid.) in improving exercise- (EIB) and methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction during 6 months of treatment, using a placebo-controlled parallel group study design. Thirty-seven children with asthma (aged 6 to 14 years; forced expired volume in 1 sec (FEV(1)) >/=70% predicted; EIB >/=20% fall in FEV(1) from baseline; no inhaled steroids during the past 4 months) participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-arm parallel study. Children receiving placebo were re-randomized to active treatment after 6 weeks. Standardized dry air treadmill exercise testing (EIB expressed as %fall in FEV(1) from baseline) and methacholine challenge using a dosimetric technique (expressed as PD(20)) were performed repeatedly during the study. During FP-treatment, the severity of EIB decreased significantly as compared to placebo within 3 weeks, the geometric mean % fall in FEV(1) being reduced from 34.1% to 9.9% for 100 microg FP bid, and from 35.9% to 7.6% for 250 microg FP bid (P < 0.05). These reductions in EIB did not differ between the 2 doses and were sustained throughout the treatment period. PD(20) methacholine improved significantly during the first 6 weeks as compared to placebo (P < 0.04) and steadily increased with time in both treatment limbs (P = 0.04), the difference in improvement between doses (100 microg FP bid, 1.6 dose steps; 250 microg FP bid, 3.3 dose steps) approaching significance after 24 weeks (P = 0.06). We conclude that in childhood asthma, the protection afforded by inhaled fluticasone propionate against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction is time- and dose-dependent, whereas protection against EIB is not. This suggests different modes of action of inhaled steroids in protecting against these pharmacological and physiological stimuli. This has to be taken into account when monitoring asthma treatment.     

The duration of protection from exercise-induced asthma by inhaled salbutamol, and a comparison with inhaled reproterol

beta-Adrenergic bronchodilators can prevent the development of exercise-induced asthma (EIA). To investigate the duration of this effect, we determined the time at which the protective effect of salbutamol diminished significantly in six subjects. All had stable asthma known to be triggered by exercise. Following a control exercise test, identical tests were repeated weekly at various times (1-6 hours) after inhalation of 200 micrograms of salbutamol. Significant protection (less than 75%) was lost in two subjects at 2 hours, in two at 4 hours and in two at 6 hours. A further exercise test was performed after inhalation of 1 mg of reproterol, at the time when salbutamol no longer afforded significant protection. There was a significantly smaller fall in peak expiratory flow rate after exercise (P less than 0.01) with reproterol than with salbutamol, at the same time after inhalation. There was no relationship between the degree or duration of protection from EIA and the bronchodilator effect of the drugs, the age and sex of the subjects, the length of asthma history or severity of base-line EIA, except perhaps the requirement for regular treatment with a steroid aerosol or sodium cromoglycate.