Acute protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction by formoterol, salmeterol and terbutaline.

The onset of bronchoprotection as obtained by various beta2-agonists has not been examined in a comparitive study. In this study, the onset of bronchodilation and protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatics after inhalation of the long-acting beta2-agonists formoterol and salmeterol and the short-acting beta2-agonist terbutaline were measured. Twenty-five subjects with asthma and a history of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (mean baseline forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1): 90% predicted; mean fall in FEV1 after exercise: 31% from baseline) were enrolled in this double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, randomized, four-period crossover study. Exercise challenges were performed on 12 days at either 5, 30, or 60 min after inhalation of a single dose of formoterol (12 microg Turbuhaler), salmeterol (50 microg Diskus), terbutaline (500 microg Turbuhaler) or placebo. Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (maximum fall in FEV1 or area under the curve) did not differ significantly between terbutaline, formorerol and salmeterol either 5, 30, or 60 min after inhalation of the study medication. In contrast, the onset of bronchodilation was slower after salmeterol compared to terbutaline and formoterol (p<0.05, each), which both showed a similar time course. At all time points between 5 and 60 min, formoterol provided significantly greater bronchodilation than salmeterol (p<0.05). These data indicate that equipotent doses of the bronchodilators salmeterol, formoterol and terbutaline were similarly effective with respect to their short-term protective potency against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, despite the fact that the time course of bronchodilation was significantly different between the three beta2-agonists.     

Evidence of the rapid protective effect of formoterol dry-powder inhalation against exercise-induced bronchospasm in athletes with asthma

BACKGROUND: Although formoterol, a new long-acting beta(2)-adrenergic agonist, has a rapid bronchodilating action, no studies have previously examined whether it can provide equally rapid protection against exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB). Aim: The aim of the study was to assess the effect of inhaled formoterol against EIB 15 min and 4 h after administration in asthmatic athletes. METHODS: The protective effect of a formoterol (12 microg) dry-powder inhalation was evaluated in 14 EIB-positive asthmatic athletes (13 males, mean age 16.8 years), in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period cross-over study. On each treatment day, the subjects underwent two cycloergometric exercise tests 15 min and 4 h after receiving formoterol or placebo. RESULTS: Formoterol induced significant bronchodilation in comparison with placebo both 15 min and 4 h after administration (p = 0.007 and p = 0.004); placebo treatment had no effect on EIB, the maximum percent fall in FEV(1) after exercise being 29.3 +/- 14.3% and 22.9 +/- 13. 7% at 15 min and 4 h, respectively. Formoterol offered good protection against EIB in 12 athletes (86%) who experienced a decrease in FEV(1) after exercise <10% both 15 min and 4 h after administration. The mean maximum percent fall in FEV(1) after formoterol was 5.9+/-7.2% at 15 min (p < 0.0001), and 5.8 +/- 6.9% at 4 h (p < 0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in resting heart rate before and after medication with placebo or formoterol, nor was the heart rate at the end of exercise significantly different on the 2 treatment days. No side effect was observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that formoterol dry powder inhalation is effective in protecting asthmatic athletes as early as 15 min after dosing. Furthermore, the data confirm the long duration of its protective effect and the absence of any significant adverse effects after acute administration.     

Protection against cold air and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction while on regular treatment with Oxis.

This study aimed to compare the duration of protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) after inhalation of formoterol (Oxis) Turbuhaler with that of terbutaline Turbuhaler and placebo Turbuhaler in asthmatic patients treated regularly with formoterol Turbuhaler 9 microg b.i.d. and inhaled steroids. The study. performed at three centres (G?teborg and Lund, Sweden, and Trondheim, Norway), consisted of an open-label part with formoterol Turbuhaler 9 microg b.i.d. and a randomized, double-blind, cross-over part with a single dose (on top of the regular treatment) of either formoterol Turbuhaler 9 microg, terbutaline Turbuhaler 0.5 mg or placebo Turbuhaler. The patients attended the clinic six times: twice for screening visits, three times for randomized treatment and once for a follow-up visit. Patients received regular b.i.d. treatment with formoterol 9 microg for a mean period of 16 days. Formoterol gave a post-exercise fall of 12, 10, 15 and 17% in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) 15 min, 4, 8 and 12 h after inhalation. The differences compared with placebo (falls of 26, 22, 23 and 22%) and terbutaline (falls of 17, 18, 22 and 22%) were all statistically significant (P<0.05 for all comparisons). Patients on regular treatment with formoterol Turbuhaler 9 microg b.i.d. have a significant protection against EIB up to 12 h after inhalation of formoterol 9 microg. The protection was also significantly better than that of terbutaline Turbuhaler 0.5 mg.     

Formoterol via Turbuhaler gave better protection than terbutaline against repeated exercise challenge for up to 12 hours in children and adolescents

We aimed to compare the protective effect of single doses of 4.5 and 9 microg of formoterol fumarate (F), 0.5 mg terbutaline sulphate (T) and placebo (P), all via Turbuhaler, against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in children. Twenty-seven asthmatic children, showing a fall of > or =20% in FEV1 after a standardized exercise challenge test (ECT) combined with cold air (-10 degrees C) inhalation, were randomized in this cross-over, double-blind study. They had a mean age of 12.6 years (range 8-17 years), mean baseline FEV1 90% (73.9-105.6%) of predicted normal value. Seventeen children used inhaled glucocorticosteroids (120-750 microg day(-1)). ECTs were performed 15 min and 4, 8, and 12 h after drug administration. F significantly reduced the fall in FEV1 after ECT to 5.4% (15 min), 5.2% (4 h), 8.2% (8 h) and 9.3% (12 h) after 4.5 microg, and 2.5%, 3.0%, 5.0% and 5.4% after 9 microg, compared with a fall of 18.4%, 15.7%, 15.6% and 16.5% in FEV1 after P. The fall after T was 3.3%, 11.6%, 14.4% and 19.1% after 15 min, 4, 8 and 12 h respectively. The difference between F and T was statistically significant from 4 h and onward (P-value for all comparisons < 0.05). Children using a single dose of either formoterol Turbuhaler 4.5 or 9 microg had significantly better bronchoprotection against repeated exercise challenge up to 12 h compared with placebo and from 4 h onward compared with terbutaline Turbuhaler 0.5 mg.     

Reversing acute bronchoconstriction in asthma: the effect of bronchodilator tolerance after treatment with formoterol.

Continuous treatment with a short-acting beta2-agonist can lead to reduced bronchodilator responsiveness during acute bronchoconstriction. This study evaluated bronchodilator tolerance to salbutamol following regular treatment with a long-acting beta2-agonist, formoterol. The modifying effect of intravenous corticosteroid was also studied. Ten asthmatic subjects (using inhaled steroids) participated in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. Formoterol 12 microg b.i.d. or matching placebo was given for 10-14 days with >2 weeks washout. Following each treatment, patients underwent a methacholine challenge to induce a fall in forced expired volume in one second (FEV1) of at least 20%, then salbutamol 100 microg, 100 microg, and 200 microg was inhaled via a spacer at 5 min intervals, with a further 400 microg at 45 min. After a third single-blind formoterol treatment period, hydrocortisone 200 mg was given intravenously prior to salbutamol. Dose-response curves for change in FEV1 with salbutamol were compared using analysis of covariance to take account of methacholine-induced changes in spirometry. Regular formoterol resulted in a significantly lower FEV1 after salbutamol at each time point compared to placebo (p<0.01). The area under the curves (AUCs) for 15 (AUC0-15) and 45 (AUC0-45) min were 28.8% and 29.5% lower following formoterol treatment (p<0.001). Pretreatment with hydrocortisone had no significant modifying effect within 2 h of administration. It is concluded that significant tolerance to the bronchodilator effects of inhaled salbutamol occurs 36 h after stopping the regular administration of formoterol. This bronchodilator tolerance is evident in circumstances of acute bronchconstriction.     

Bronchodilation and bronchoprotection in asthmatic preschool children from formoterol administered by mechanically actuated dry-powder inhaler and spacer.

We evaluated the bronchodilatory and the bronchoprotective effect of the long-acting beta(2)-agonist formoterol administered as dry powder from a mechanically actuated dry-powder inhaler (DPI) using spacer in 12 asthmatic children 2 to 5 yr of age. Lung function was measured as the specific airway resistance (sRaw) in a whole body plethysmograph. Hyperventilation of cold, dry air was used as bronchial challenge, and the responsiveness was estimated as change in sRaw. The bronchoprotective effect of formoterol Turbohaler 9 microg was compared with salbutamol 200 microg and placebo at 15 min, 4 and 8 h postdose in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. All treatments were administered from DPI (Turbohaler) actuated mechanically into a spacer. Formoterol and salbutamol caused similar and significant bronchodilation at the first measurement 3 min postdose. Formoterol offered a sustained and stable bronchodilation for at least 8 h. Salbutamol provided significant bronchodilation for less than 4 h. Formoterol caused significant bronchoprotection of 80% for at least 8 h compared with placebo, and from 4 h onward compared with salbutamol. Bronchoprotection from salbutamol lasted less than 4 h. In conclusion, formoterol administered as dry powder in a single dose provided rapid and sustained bronchodilation and clinically significant bronchoprotection for at least 8 h in 2- to 5-yr-old asthmatic children. Furthermore, this study suggests that mechanical actuation of DPI using a spacer is effective for aerosol treatment of young asthmatic children.     

Relief of dyspnoea by beta2-agonists after methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction

Virtually all asthma patients use brorichodilators. Formoterol and salbutamol have a rapid onset of bronchodilating effect, whereas salmeterol acts slower. We studied the onset of improvement of dyspnoea sensation after inhalation with these bronchodilators and placebo to reverse a methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction as a model for an acute asthma attack. Seventeen patients with asthma completed this randomised, double-blind, crossover, double-dummy study. On 4 test days, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and Borg score were recorded and patients were challenged with methacholine until FEV1 fell with > or = 30% of baseline value. Thereafter, formoterol 12 microg via Turbuhaler, salbutamol 50 microg via Turbuhaler, salmeterol 50 microg via Diskhaler, or placebo was inhaled. FEV1 and Borg scores were assessed during the following 60 min. The first sensed improvement of Borg score was significantly (P<0.05) faster achieved with formoterol (geometric mean (Gmean) (range) 1.5 (1-40) min) and salbutamol 1.8 (1-10) min than with salmeterol 4.5 (1-30) min and placebo 3.4 (1-40) min. The Borg score returned significantly faster to the baseline value with formoterol, salbutamol, and salmeterol (Gmean time 13.8 (1-75), 13.4 (1-60), and 18.0 (1-75) min, respectively) than with placebo (33.6 (1-75 min). Formoterol and salbutamol act significantly faster than salmeterol in relieving dyspnoea induced by methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction, in patients with asthma.     

The bronchodilatory effects of loratadine, terbutaline, and both together versus placebo in childhood asthma.

AIM: To assess the bronchodilatory effect of loratadine in children with mild-to-moderate asthma and to determine whether loratadine interacts with terbutaline. METHODS: The effect on pulmonary functions of a 10 mg oral dose of loratadine, with and without inhaled terbutaline powder (0.5 mg), was determined in 13 patients with a mean (SE) age of 10.63 (0.77) years (range from eight to 17 years) at 11 time points during 8 h in a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, crossover study. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) was the primary measure of efficacy. RESULTS: Although loratadine alone produced an increase in FEV1 relative to baseline, this was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Terbutaline with, and without loratadine, significantly increased FEV1 from 1 to 5 h according to baseline (p < 0.004). When compared with the placebo, loratadine significantly increased FEV1 from 150 min to 8 h (p < 0.05). Also, terbutaline alone, or in combination with loratadine, significantly increased FEV1 from 30 min to 7 h (p < 0.004, from 30 min to 5 h; p < 0.05, between 6-7 h). Although the mean increase in FEV1, with terbutaline + loratadine in combination, was greater than with terbutaline alone, the difference was not significant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Loratadine has a mild bronchodilatory effect in the study period and does not interfere with the bronchodilatory effect of terbutaline in childhood asthma.     

Comparison of the protective effect of formoterol and of salmeterol against exercise-induced bronchospasm when given immediately before a cycloergometric test

BACKGROUND: Salmeterol and formoterol, two long-acting beta(2)-adrenergic agonists, have been shown to be effective against exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB) several hours after inhalation, but no study has yet compared their protective effect immediately after administration. OBJECTIVES: To compare the protective effect of inhaled formoterol and salmeterol against EIB immediately and 4 h after administration. METHODS: Double-blind, two-period cross-over study of 11 EIB-positive asthmatic subjects (mean age 21.2 years) administered formoterol 24 microg and salmeterol 50 microg by means of metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) on 2 days separated by an interval of 72 h; the subjects performed two cycloergometric exercise tests immediately and 4 h after dosing. Forced expiratory volume (FEV(1)) measurements were made before and at the end of exercise, and then after 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 min. The maximum percentage decrease in FEV(1) in the 30 min following exercise was considered. RESULTS: Immediately after drug administration, but not 4 h later, formoterol provided significantly better protection against EIB than salmeterol (p = 0.02). The number of formoterol-treated subjects protected against EIB (i.e. with a <15% decrease in FEV(1) after treatment) was 10/11 after the first exercise test and 7/8 after the second; the corresponding figures after salmeterol treatment were 5/11 and 7/8. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that formoterol inhaled via an MDI is effective in preventing EIB as early as within a few minutes of administration, whereas salmeterol does not offer any appreciable protection. On the contrary, the protective effect of the two drugs is clinically equivalent 4 h after administration.     

Rapid onset of bronchodilation in COPD: a placebo-controlled study comparing formoterol (Foradil Aerolizer) with salbutamol (Ventodisk)

Formoterol fumarate is a beta2-agonist bronchodilator that combines a fast onset of action with a long duration of action. Its fast onset of action is well documented in asthma but has not been directly compared with that of salbutamol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to assess the bronchodilatory effects over the first 3 h after inhalation of single doses of formoterol 24 microg delivered via the Aerolizer dry powder inhaler device (double-blind), or salbutamol 400 microg delivered by a Diskhaler dry powder inhaler (single-blind) in patients with COPD. A total of 24 patients with COPD were randomized [mean age 61.6 +/- 7.8 years, mean forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) 1.38 +/- 0.32 l and 45.8 +/- 9.6% of predicted]. Inhalation of formoterol or salbutamol resulted in similar increases in FEV from 0 to 3 h post-dose. Both drugs produced similar bronchodilation by 5 min, which became almost maximal by 30 min. The primary efficacy variable, the area under the curve (AUC) of the FEV increase above predose baseline from 0 to 30 min (AUC(0-30 min)), demonstrated significant effects for formoterol (mean 5.89 +/- 4.67 l min(-1)), and salbutamol (mean 6.06 +/- 4.34 l min(-1)), which were not statistically different from each other but statistically significantly higher (P<0.0001) than that observed with placebo (-0.32 +/- 2.59 l min(-1)). In addition, both formoterol and salbutamol produced similar and rapid increases in forced vital capacity (FVC). In summary, this study confirms the rapid onset of action of formoterol and indicates that the onset of action of formoterol and salbutamol are similar in patients with COPD.     

Formoterol Turbuhaler for as-needed therapy in patients with mild acute exacerbations of COPD.

Worsening of underlying bronchospasm may be associated with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). As airway obstruction becomes more severe, the therapeutic option is to add a short-acting inhaled beta2-agonist as needed to cause rapid relief of bronchospasm. Unfortunately however, the most effective dosage may increase above that recommended during acute exacerbations. Formoterol (Oxis) Turbuhaler has a rapid onset of action (within minutes) and demonstrates a maintained effect on a rway function. In this study, we examined the effects of formoterol used as needed in 20 patients with acute exacerbations of COPD. A dose response curve to inhaled formoterol (9 microg per inhalation) or placebo was constructed using three separate inhalations, i.e. a total cumulative dose of 27 microg. Dose increments were given at 20-min intervals, with measurements being made 15 min after each dose. Formoterol, but not placebo, induced a large and significant (P<0.001) dose-dependent increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) [mean differences from baseline = 0.1311 after 9 microg formoterol (95% CI: 0.096-0.167)] 0.1811 after 18 microg formoterol (95% CI: 0.140-0.2221) and 0.2081 after 27 microg formoterol (95% CI: 0.153-0.2631). However, 27 microg formoterol did not induce further benefit [0.0271 (95% CI: -0.008-0.0621); P=0.121] when compared wth 18 microg formoterol. Results of this study suggest the use of higher than customary dose of formoterol for as-needed therapy to provide rapid relief of bronchospasm in patients suffering from acute exacerbations of partially reversible COPD.     

Formoterol (OXIS) Turbuhaler as a rescue therapy compared with salbutamol pMDI plus spacer in patients with acute severe asthma

Formoterol has a similar onset of effect to salbutamol but a prolonged duration of action. However, the relative efficacy of the two drugs in acute severe asthma is not known. This double-blind, double-dummy study compared the safety and efficacy of the maximum recommended daily dose of formoterol and a predicted equivalent dose of salbutamol in 88 patients presenting to the emergency department with acute severe asthma. Patients were randomized to formoterol 54 microg via Turbuhaler or salbutamol 2400 microg via pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) plus spacer in three equal doses over 1 h. Following the full dose, mean FEV1 at 75 min increased by 37% for formoterol and 28% for salbutamol (P = 0.18). The maximum increase in FEV1 over 4 h was significantly greater with formoterol compared with salbutamol (51% vs. 36%, respectively P < 0.05) and formoterol was as effective as salbutamol at improving symptoms and wellbeing. Both treatments were well tolerated. Formoterol caused a greater decrease in serum potassium (difference -0.2 mmol/l). In severe acute asthma, bronchodilator therapy with high-dose (54 microg) formoterol Turbuhaler provided equally rapid improvements in lung function of greater magnitude over 4 h than high-dose (2400 microg) salbutamol pMDI plus spacer.     

Tachyphylaxis following regular use of formoterol in exercise-induced bronchospasm.

BACKGROUND: Formoterol is a highly effective therapeutic agent in the prevention of exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB). Regular use of beta-adrenergic drugs may result in a reduction in the protective effect afforded by these bronchodilators against bronchoconstrictor stimuli. It is unknown whether this effect extends to formoterol and exercise. METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind, parallel clinical trial in 19 patients with EIB. Each patient received inhaled formoterol or placebo twice daily during 4 weeks. Patients performed two exercise tests in a cycle ergometer on the 1st, 14th, and 28th study days separated 3 hours from each other. A dose of formoterol was given 30 min prior to the 2nd test. RESULTS: There were significant differences in bronchoprotection between days 1 and 14 (p = .012) and between days 1 and 28 (p = .012) in the formoterol group. No differences were found in the placebo group. The evolution of the bronchoprotection index was also significantly different between the formoterol and the placebo group (p = .002) from day 1 to 28. CONCLUSIONS: Tachyphylaxis developed to the protective effect of formoterol against EIB after 4 weeks of regular dosing. Tolerance was already found on day 14, though not progressive. Formoterol should be recommended only as needed in EIB.     

Budesonide/formoterol combination therapy as both maintenance and reliever medication in asthma

Asthma control is improved by combining inhaled corticosteroids with long-acting beta2-agonists. However, fluctuating asthma control still occurs. We hypothesized that in patients receiving low maintenance dose budesonide/formoterol (bud/form), replacing short-acting beta2-agonist (SABA) reliever with as-needed bud/form would provide rapid symptom relief and simultaneous adjustment in antiinflammatory therapy, thereby reducing exacerbations. In this double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study, 2,760 patients with asthma aged 4-80 years (FEV1 60-100% predicted) received either terbutaline 0.4 mg as SABA with bud/form 80/4.5 microg twice a day (bud/form + SABA) or bud 320 microg twice a day (bud + SABA) or bud/form 80/4.5 microg twice a day with 80/4.5 microg as-needed (bud/form maintenance + relief). Children used a once-nocte maintenance dose. Bud/form maintenance + relief prolonged time to first severe exacerbation (p < 0.001; primary endpoint), resulting in a 45-47% lower exacerbation risk versus bud/form + SABA (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.44, 0.67) or bud + SABA (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval 0.43, 0.65). Bud/form maintenance + relief also prolonged the time to the first, second, and third exacerbation requiring medical intervention (p < 0.001), reduced severe exacerbation rate, and improved symptoms, awakenings, and lung function compared with both fixed dosing regimens.     

Safety of formoterol Turbuhaler at cumulative dose of 90 microg in patients with acute bronchial obstruction.

This study compared the safety of formoterol (Oxis Turbuhaler; 90 microg delivered dose; 120 microg metered dose) with terbutaline (Bricanyl Turbuhaler; 10 mg), in patients with acute bronchoconstriction. Forty-eight patients (31 females) with a mean age of 45 yrs, were randomized into two parallel groups (double-blind design). Mean baseline forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was 0.98 L (33% of predicted normal). Study drugs were administered on six occasions during 3 h (formoterol 4.5 microg or terbutaline 0.5 mg x inhalation(-1), 20 inhalations). Patients received intravenous prednisolone after 1.5 h and oxygen during the first 3 h. Pulse rate, serum potassium, 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), Holter ECG, arterial blood gases and FEV1 were assessed during 12 h after the first dose. Four patients (one formoterol, three terbutaline) discontinued. The 12-h mean values of serum potassium decreased from 4.02 to 3.89 mmol x L(-1) for formoterol and from 4.22 to 3.76 mmol x L(-1) for terbutaline. Mean 12-h pulse rate was significantly (p<0.01) higher in the terbutaline group (101.7 beats per minute (bpm)) than in the formoterol group (93.5 bpm). No individual patient value was considered clinically important or alarming. FEV1 improved in both groups but with no statistically significant difference between treatments. Oxis Turbuhaler (90 microg) was at least as safe and well tolerated as terbutaline (10 mg) [corrected] in patients with acute bronchoconstriction.     

Safety of sputum induction with hypertonic saline solution in exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

BACKGROUND: The safety of sputum induction (SI) is well described in stable asthma, but the safety of SI in exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) has not been established. OBJECTIVES: Our goals were to examine the relationship between the severity of EIB and bronchoconstriction during SI, and to determine if SI conducted after exercise challenge increases the risk of excess bronchoconstriction during SI. METHODS: SI was conducted in 32 patients with mild-to-moderate asthma (baseline FEV(1), 86 +/- 9% of predicted [mean +/- SD]) with EIB (15 to 63% reduction in FEV(1) following exercise challenge) following pretreatment with albuterol using 3% saline solution and repeated on a separate day 30-min after exercise challenge. RESULTS: There was a reduction in peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) during SI without exercise (mean maximum reduction vs baseline, 4.0% at 10 min; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0 to 7.1; p = 0.02) and during SI 30 min following exercise (mean maximum reduction vs baseline, 5.2% at 8 min; 95% CI, 1.0 to 7.5; p < or = 0.01); however, there was no difference between the PEFR reductions during SI without or following exercise challenge. The best predictor of reduction in PEFR during SI was the preprocedure FEV(1), while the severity of EIB was not associated with bronchoconstriction during SI. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that SI can be performed safely following exercise challenge in asthmatics with EIB, and that the severity of EIB prior to SI is not a major determinant of bronchoconstriction during SI.     

Formoterol for maintenance and as-needed treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Formoterol is a long-acting beta2-agonist with a rapid onset of effect in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), making it potentially suitable for both maintenance and as-needed bronchodilator treatment. To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of maintenance formoterol in patients with COPD and to compare the effects of additional formoterol as needed with terbutaline. In this 6-month, double-blind study, 657 patients with COPD (40 years, forced expiratory volume in 1s [FEV1] 40-70% predicted normal) were randomized to formoterol 9 microg twice daily (bid) plus terbutaline 0.5 mg as needed (FORM bid), formoterol 9 microg bid plus formoterol 4.5 microg as needed (FORM bid+prn), or placebo bid plus terbutaline 0.5 mg as needed (placebo), all administered via Turbuhaler. Primary efficacy variables were FEV1 and the sum of breathlessness and chest tightness scores combined symptom score. Formoterol significantly (P<0.01) increased FEV(1) compared with placebo: FORM bid 6.5% (95% CI: 2.5, 10.7%); FORM bid+prn 11.8% (95% CI: 7.7, 16.2%). Combined symptom score decreased significantly in both formoterol groups compared with placebo: FORM bid -0.27 (95% CI: -0.49, -0.06; P=0.012); FORM bid+prn -0.32 (95% CI: -0.53, -0.11; P=0.0026). Similar significant (P<0.05) improvements were seen in both formoterol groups for morning peak expiratory flow, cough and sleep scores, and reliever use. In this study, formoterol 9 microg bid via Turbuhaler as maintenance therapy, with either formoterol or terbutaline as rescue medication, provided sustained improvements in lung function and COPD symptoms. Both formoterol regimens were well tolerated with no differences in adverse events or electrocardiogram profiles.     

Dose-responses over time to inhaled fluticasone propionate treatment of exercise- and methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction in children with asthma

When treating bronchial hyperresponsiveness to so-called direct and indirect stimuli, distinct pathophysiological mechanisms might require differences in dose and duration of inhaled corticosteroid therapy. To test this hypothesis in children with asthma, we investigated the time- and dose-dependent effects of 2 doses of fluticasone propionate (FP, 100 or 250 microg bid.) in improving exercise- (EIB) and methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction during 6 months of treatment, using a placebo-controlled parallel group study design. Thirty-seven children with asthma (aged 6 to 14 years; forced expired volume in 1 sec (FEV(1)) >/=70% predicted; EIB >/=20% fall in FEV(1) from baseline; no inhaled steroids during the past 4 months) participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-arm parallel study. Children receiving placebo were re-randomized to active treatment after 6 weeks. Standardized dry air treadmill exercise testing (EIB expressed as %fall in FEV(1) from baseline) and methacholine challenge using a dosimetric technique (expressed as PD(20)) were performed repeatedly during the study. During FP-treatment, the severity of EIB decreased significantly as compared to placebo within 3 weeks, the geometric mean % fall in FEV(1) being reduced from 34.1% to 9.9% for 100 microg FP bid, and from 35.9% to 7.6% for 250 microg FP bid (P < 0.05). These reductions in EIB did not differ between the 2 doses and were sustained throughout the treatment period. PD(20) methacholine improved significantly during the first 6 weeks as compared to placebo (P < 0.04) and steadily increased with time in both treatment limbs (P = 0.04), the difference in improvement between doses (100 microg FP bid, 1.6 dose steps; 250 microg FP bid, 3.3 dose steps) approaching significance after 24 weeks (P = 0.06). We conclude that in childhood asthma, the protection afforded by inhaled fluticasone propionate against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction is time- and dose-dependent, whereas protection against EIB is not. This suggests different modes of action of inhaled steroids in protecting against these pharmacological and physiological stimuli. This has to be taken into account when monitoring asthma treatment.     

Onset of action of formoterol/budesonide in single inhaler vs. formoterol in patients with COPD

Formoterol is a beta(2)-agonist bronchodilator that combines a fast onset of action with a long duration of broncholytic effect. An increasing documentation is showing that the combination of a long acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist bronchodilator and an inhaled corticosteroid targets the airways obstruction in patients with COPD. In this study, we have explored whether the acute addition of an inhaled corticosteroid influences the fast bronchodilator response to formoterol. A total of 20 patients with stable COPD were randomized. Single doses of formoterol/budesonide 2 x (4.5/160)microg or formoterol 2 x 4.5 microg were given via Turbuhaler. Serial measurements of FEV(1) were performed over 60 min. Formoterol/budesonide elicited a significantly larger mean FEV(1)-AUC(0-15 min) than formoterol alone. Also the change in FEV(1) 15 min after inhalation of formoterol/budesonide combination (0.197 l; 95% CI: to 0.142-0.252) was greater than that induced by formoterol alone (0.147 l; 95% CI: to 0.092-0.201). The mean increases in FEV(1) were always higher after budesonide/formoterol than formoterol alone, although both treatments induced a significant improvement over baseline at each explored time point. Even the FEV(1)-AUC(0-60 min) after formoterol/budesonide was significantly larger than that after formoterol. Both treatments induced a significant reduction in VAS score but did not modify heart rate in a statistically significant manner. This study indicates that the addition of budesonide influences the fast onset of action of formoterol, but does not induce systemic effects, in patients with stable COPD.     

Formoterol Turbuhaler as reliever medication in patients with acute asthma.

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of formoterol versus salbutamol as reliever medication in patients presenting at an emergency dept with acute asthma. A randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group study was performed in four Australian emergency treatment centres. The study included a total of 78 adult patients (mean baseline forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 1.83 L; 59% predicted) with acute asthma. Based on the expected dose equivalence of formoterol Turbuhaler 4.5 microg (delivered dose) and salbutamol pressurised metered-dose inhaler 200 microg (metered dose), patients received a total of formoterol Turbuhaler 36 microg (delivered) or salbutamol pressurised metered-dose inhaler with spacer 1,600 microg (metered), divided into two equal doses at 0 and 30 min. FEV1, peak expiratory flow and systemic beta2-agonist effects were monitored for 4 h. The primary variable was FEV1% pred at 45 min. At 45 min, mean increases in FEV1 expressed in % pred were 6.6% and 9.3%, respectively, with a small adjusted mean difference in favour of salbutamol (3.0%, 95% confidence interval -2.0-8.0). Transient increases in systemic beta2-agonist effects occurred predominantly with salbutamol, although no significant treatment differences were observed. Eight patients discontinued due to adverse events. In this study of patients presenting at emergency depts with acute asthma, formoterol Turbuhaler 36 microg was well tolerated and, as rescue therapy, had an efficacy that was not different from that of salbutamol pressurised metered-dose inhaler with spacer 1,600 microg in the number of patients studied.