Utilizing pharmacotherapy and mesenchymal stem cell therapy to reduce inlfammation following traumatic brain injury

The pathologic process of chronic phase traumatic brain injury is associated with spreading inlfamma-tion, cell death, and neural dysfunction. It is thought that sequestration of inlfammatory mediators can facilitate recovery and promote an environment that fosters cellular regeneration. Studies have targeted post-traumatic brain injury inlfammation with the use of pharmacotherapy and cell therapy. These thera-peutic options are aimed at reducing the edematous and neurodegenerative inlfammation that have been associated with compromising the integrity of the blood-brain barrier. Although studies have yielded posi-tive results from anti-inlfammatory pharmacotherapy and cell therapy individually, emerging research has begun to target inlfammation using combination therapy. The joint use of anti-inlfammatory drugs along-side stem cell transplantation may provide better clinical outcomes for traumatic brain injury patients. Despite the promising results in this ifeld of research, it is important to note that most of the studies men-tioned in this review have completed their studies using animal models. Translation of this research into a clinical setting will require additional laboratory experiments and larger preclinical trials.     

Current status of cell-mediated regenerative therapies for human spinal cord injury

During the past decade, significant advances have been made in refinements for regenerative therapies following human spinal cord injury （SCI）. Positive results have been achieved with different types of cells in various clinical studies of SCI. In this review, we summarize recently-completed clinical trials using cell- mediated regenerative therapies for human SCI, together with ongoing trials using neural stem cells. Specifically, clinical studies published in Chinese journals are included. These studies show that current transplantation therapies are relatively safe, and have provided varying degrees of neurological recovery. However, many obstacles exist, hindering the introduction of a specific clinical therapy, including complications and their causes, selection of the target population, and optimization of transplantation material. Despite these and other challenges, with the collaboration of research groups and strong support from various organizations, cell-mediated regenerative therapies will open new perspectives for SCI treatment.     

Potential of mesenchymal stem cells alone,or in combination,to treat traumatic brain injury

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) causes death and disability in the United States and around the world. The traumatic insult causes the mechanical injury of the brain and primary cellular death. While a comprehensive pathological mechanism of TBI is still lacking, the focus of the TBI research is concentrated on understanding the pathophysiology and developing suitable therapeutic approaches. Given the complexities in pathophysiology involving interconnected immunologic, inflammatory, and neurological cascades occurring after TBI, the therapies directed to a single mechanism fail in the clinical trials. This has led to the development of the paradigm of a combination therapeutic approach against TBI. While there are no drugs available for the treatment of TBI, stem cell therapy has shown promising results in preclinical studies. But, the success of the therapy depends on the survival of the stem cells, which are limited by several factors including route of administration, health of the administered cells, and inflammatory microenvironment of the injured brain. Reducing the inflammation prior to cell administration may provide a better outcome of cell therapy following TBI. This review is focused on different therapeutic approaches of TBI and the present status of the clinical trials.     

Mesenchymal stem cell therapy alleviates the neuroinflammation associated with acquired brain injury

Ischemic stroke and traumatic brain injury (TBI) comprise two particularly prevalent and costly examples of acquired brain injury (ABI). Following stroke or TBI, primary cell death and secondary cell death closely model disease progression and worsen outcomes. Mounting evidence indicates that long‐term neuroinflammation extensively exacerbates the secondary deterioration of brain structure and function. Due to their immunomodulatory and regenerative properties, mesenchymal stem cell transplants have emerged as a promising approach to treating this facet of stroke and TBI pathology. In this review, we summarize the classification of cell death in ABI and discuss the prominent role of inflammation. We then consider the efficacy of bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cell (BM‐MSC) transplantation as a therapy for these injuries. Finally, we examine recent laboratory and clinical studies utilizing transplanted BM‐MSCs as antiinflammatory and neurorestorative treatments for stroke and TBI. Clinical trials of BM‐MSC transplants for stroke and TBI support their promising protective and regenerative properties. Future research is needed to allow for better comparison among trials and to elaborate on the emerging area of cell‐based combination treatments.     

Mesenchymal stem cells maintain the microenvironment of central nervous system by regulating the polarization of macrophages/microglia after traumatic brain injury

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), which are regarded as promising candidates for cell replacement therapies, are able to regulate immune responses after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Secondary immune response following the mechanical injury is the essential factor leading to the necrosis and apoptosis of neural cells during and after the cerebral edema has subsided and there is lack of efficient agent that can mitigate such neuroinflammation in the clinical application. By means of three molecular pathways (prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), tumor-necrosis-factor-inducible gene 6 protein (TSG-6), and progesterone receptor (PR) and glucocorticoid receptors (GR)), MSCs induce the activation of macrophages/microglia and drive them polarize into the M2 phenotypes, which inhibits the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and promotes tissue repair and nerve regeneration. The regulation of MSCs and the polarization of macrophages/microglia are dynamically changing based on the inflammatory environment. Under the stimulation of platelet lysate (PL), MSCs also promote the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Meanwhile, the statue of macrophages/microglia exerts significant effects on the survival, proliferation, differentiation and activation of MSCs by changing the niche of cells. They form positive feedback loops in maintaining the homeostasis after TBI to relieving the secondary injury and promoting tissue repair. MSC therapies have obtained great achievements in several central nervous system disease clinical trials, which will accelerate the application of MSCs in TBI treatment.     

Impact of pediatric traumatic brain injury on hippocampal neurogenesis

Traumatic brain injury(TBI) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in the pediatric population. With advances in medical care, the mortality rate of pediatric TBI has declined. However, more children and adolescents are living with TBI-related cognitive and emotional impairments, which negatively affects the quality of their life. Adult hippocampal neurogenesis plays an important role in cognition and mood regulation. Alterations in adult hippocampal neurogenesis are associated with a variety of neurological and neurodegenerative diseases, including TBI. Promoting endogenous hippocampal neurogenesis after TBI merits significant attention. However, TBI affects the function of neural stem/progenitor cells in the dentate gyrus of hippocampus, which results in aberrant migration and impaired dendrite development of adult-born neurons. Therefore, a better understanding of adult hippocampal neurogenesis after TBI can facilitate a more successful neuro-restoration of damage in immature brains. Secondary injuries, such as neuroinflammation and oxidative stress, exert a significant impact on hippocampal neurogenesis. Currently, a variety of therapeutic approaches have been proposed for ameliorating secondary TBI injuries. In this review, we discuss the uniqueness of pediatric TBI, adult hippocampal neurogenesis after pediatric TBI, and current efforts that promote neuroprotection to the developing brains, which can be leveraged to facilitate neuroregeneration.     

Transplantation of autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells for traumatic brain injury

Results from the present study demonstrated that transplantation of autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells into the lesion site in rat brain significantly ameliorated brain tissue pathological changes and brain edema, attenuated glial cell proliferation, and increased brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression. In addition, the number of cells double-labeled for 5-bromodeoxyuridine/glial fibrillary acidic protein and cells expressing nestin increased. Finally, blood vessels were newly generated, and the rats exhibited improved motor and cognitive functions. These results suggested that transplantation of autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells promoted brain remodeling and improved neurological functions following traumatic brain injury.     

The potential of endogenous neurogenesis for brain repair and regeneration following traumatic brain injury

Traumatic brain injury （TBI） is the leading cause of death and disability of persons under 45 years old in the United States, affecting over 1.5 million individtials each year. It had been th ought that recovery from such injuries is severely limited due to the inability of the adult bra in to replace damaged neurons. However, recent studies indicate that the mature mammalian central nervous system （CNS） has the potential to replenish damaged neurons by proliferation and neuronal differentiation of adult neural stem/progenitor cells residing in the neurogenic regions in the brain. Furthermore, increasing evidence indicates that these endogenous stem/ progenitor cells may play regenerative and reparative roles in response to CNS injuries or diseases. In support of this notion, heightened levels of cell proliferation and neurogenesis have been ob- served in response to brain trauma or insults suggesting that the brain has the inherent potential to restore populations of damaged or destroyed neurons. This review will discuss the potential functions of adult neurogenesis and recent development of strategies aiming at harnessing this neurogenic capacity in order to repopulate and repair the injured brain.     

The potential of neural transplantation for brain repair and regeneration following traumatic brain injury

Traumatic brain injury is a major health problem worldwide. Currently, there is no effective treatment to improve neural structural repair and functional recovery of patients in the clinic. Cell transplantation is a potential strategy to repair and regenerate the injured brain. This review article summarized recent de-velopment in cell transplantation studies for post-traumatic brain injury brain repair with varying types of cell sources. It also discussed the potential of neural transplantation to repair/promote recovery of the injured brain following traumatic brain injury.     

Intravitreal stem cell paracrine properties as a potential neuroprotective therapy for retinal photoreceptor neurodegenerative diseases

Retinal degenerations are the leading causes of irreversible visual loss worldwide. Many pathologies included under this umbrella involve progressive degeneration and ultimate loss of the photoreceptor cells, with age-related macular degeneration and inherited and ischemic retinal diseases the most relevant. These diseases greatly impact patients' daily lives, with accompanying marked social and economic consequences. However, the currently available treatments only delay the onset or slow progression of visual impairment, and there are no cures for these photoreceptor diseases. Therefore, new therapeutic strategies are being investigated, such as gene therapy, optogenetics, cell replacement, or cell-based neuroprotection. Specifically, stem cells can secrete neurotrophic, immunomodulatory, and anti-angiogenic factors that potentially protect and preserve retinal cells from neurodegeneration. Further, neuroprotection can be used in different types of retinal degenerative diseases and at different disease stages, unlike other potential therapies. This review summarizes stem cell-based paracrine neuroprotective strategies for photoreceptor degeneration, which are under study in clinical trials, and the latest preclinical studies. Effective retinal neuroprotection could be the next frontier in photoreceptor diseases, and the development of novel neuroprotective strategies will address the unmet therapeutic needs.     

Tandem Mass Tag-based proteomics analysis reveals the vital role of inflammation in traumatic brain injury in a mouse model

Proteomics is a powerful tool that can be used to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of diseases and identify new biomarkers. Therefore, it may also be helpful for understanding the detailed pathological mechanism of traumatic brain injury(TBI). In this study, we performed Tandem Mass Tag-based quantitative analysis of cortical proteome profiles in a mouse model of TBI. Our results showed that there were 302 differentially expressed proteins in TBI mice compared with normal mice 7 days after in...     

The two pathophysiologies of focal brain ischemia: implications for translational stroke research

Brain injury after focal ischemia evolves along two basically different pathophysiologies, depending on the severity of the primary flow reduction and the dynamics of postischemic recirculation. In permanent and gradually reversed focal ischemia as after thromboembolic occlusion, primary core injury is irreversible but the expansion of the core into the penumbra can be alleviated by hemodynamic and molecular interventions. Such alleviation can only be achieved within 3 hours after the onset of ischemia because untreated core injury expands to near maximum size during this interval. In promptly reversed transient ischemia as after mechanical vascular occlusion, primary core injury may recover but a secondary delayed injury evolves after a free interval of as long as 6 to 12 hours. This injury can be alleviated throughout the free interval but the longer window is without clinical relevance because transient mechanical vascular occlusion is not a model of naturally occurring stroke. As this difference is widely ignored in stroke research, most clinical trials have been designed with a far too long therapeutic window, which explains their failure. Transient mechanical vascular occlusion models should, therefore, be eliminated from the repertoire of preclinical stroke research.     

Taking stock and planning for the next decade: realistic prospects for stem cell therapies for the nervous system

In thinking about the practical application of stem cell biology to clinical situations--particularly for the central nervous system (CNS)-it is instructive to remember that the neural stem cell (NSC) field--as a prototype for somatic stem cells in general-emerged as the unanticipated byproduct of investigations by developmental neurobiologists into fundamental aspects of neural determination, commitment, and plasticity. Stem cell behavior is ultimately an expression of developmental principles, an alluring vestige from the more plastic and generative stages of organogenesis. In attempting to apply stem cell biology therapeutically, it is instructive always to bear in mind what role the stem cell plays in development and to what cues it was "designed" to respond in trying to understand the "logic" behind its behavior (both what investigators want to see and what investigators do not want to see). Furthermore, in transplantation paradigms, the interaction between engrafted NSCs and recipient host is a dynamic, complex, ongoing reciprocal interaction where both entities are constantly in flux. In this review, we propose a "roadmap" to the clinic, with a particular emphasis on flagging the "potholes" and "speed bumps" through which we must navigate. Despite the admonitions to be circumspect, we also suggest disease processes that may be within the grasp of proven stem cell properties and might be approachable in the relatively near future.     

人脐带间充质干细胞移植治疗大鼠创伤性脑损伤

背景：脐带间充质干细胞体内移植治疗脑损伤的效果目前尚较少见报道。 目的：观察人脐带间充质干细胞移植对大鼠液压冲击脑损伤的治疗作用。 方法：从新生儿脐带中分离、培养间充质干细胞。制作中度打击大鼠脑损伤模型。实验分为4组：①脐带间充质干细胞移植组：损伤后原位移植脐带间充质干细胞。②对照组：损伤后原位注射等量DMEN/F12培养基。③单纯损伤组：仅施行损伤。④假损伤组：仅切开头皮及颅骨,不实施机械性损伤。 结果与结论：脐带间充质干细胞移植后1~3周,动物神经功能评分较对照组明显改善;4周后,各组动物神经功能评分均恢复正常。免疫组织化学检测表明少部分移植细胞表达神经元特异性烯醇化酶,胶质纤维酸性蛋白。与对照组相比,移植组损伤区血管内皮生长因子表达明显增加,凋亡细胞减少。提示脐带充间质干细胞脑内移植有助于促进创伤性脑损伤后的早期功能恢复,这种治疗效果是通过刺激宿主细胞分泌血管内皮生长因子,增加损伤区微血管密度,抑制宿主细胞凋亡等实现的。     

Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosome suppresses programmed cell death in traumatic brain injury via PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitophagy

Aims

Recently, human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell (HucMSC)-derived exosome is a new focus of research in neurological diseases. The present study was aimed to investigate the protective effects of HucMSC-derived exosome in both in vivo and in vitro TBI models.

Methods

We established both mouse and neuron TBI models in our study. After treatment with HucMSC-derived exosome, the neuroprotection of exosome was investigated by the neurologic severity score (NSS), grip test score, neurological score, brain water content, and cortical lesion volume. Moreover, we determined the biochemical and morphological changes associated with apoptosis, pyroptosis, and ferroptosis after TBI.

Results

We revealed that treatment of exosome could improve neurological function, decrease cerebral edema, and attenuate brain lesion after TBI. Furthermore, administration of exosome suppressed TBI-induced cell death, apoptosis, pyroptosis, and ferroptosis. In addition, exosome-activated phosphatase and tensin homolog-induced putative kinase protein 1/Parkinson protein 2 E3 ubiquitin–protein ligase (PINK1/Parkin) pathway-mediated mitophagy after TBI. However, the neuroprotection of exosome was attenuated when mitophagy was inhibited, and PINK1 was knockdown. Importantly, exosome treatment also decreased neuron cell death, suppressed apoptosis, pyroptosis, and ferroptosis and activated the PINK1/Parkin pathway-mediated mitophagy after TBI in vitro.

Conclusion

Our results provided the first evidence that exosome treatment played a key role in neuroprotection after TBI through the PINK1/Parkin pathway-mediated mitophagy.     

Cell tracking technologies for acute ischemic brain injury

Stem cell therapy has showed considerable potential in the treatment of stroke over the last decade. In order that these therapies may be optimized, the relative benefits of growth factor release, immunomodulation, and direct tissue replacement by therapeutic stem cells are widely under investigation. Fundamental to the progress of this research are effective imaging techniques that enable cell tracking in vivo. Direct analysis of the benefit of cell therapy includes the study of cell migration, localization, division and/or differentiation, and survival. This review explores the various imaging tools currently used in clinics and laboratories, addressing image resolution, long-term cell monitoring, imaging agents/isotopes, as well as safety and costs associated with each technique. Finally, burgeoning tracking techniques are discussed, with emphasis on multimodal imaging.     

Extracellular proteolysis in brain injury and inflammation: role for plasminogen activators and matrix metalloproteinases

The role of intracellular proteases (e.g., calpains and caspases) in the pathophysiology of neuronal cell death has been extensively investigated. More recently, accumulating data have suggested that extracellular proteolysis also plays a critical role. The two major systems that modify the extracellular matrix in brain are the plasminogen activator (PA) and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) axes. This Mini-Review delineates major pathways of PA and MMP action after stroke, brain trauma, and chronic inflammation. Deleterious effects include the disruption of blood-brain barrier integrity, amplification of inflammatory infiltrates, demyelination, and possibly interruption of cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions that may trigger cell death. In contrast, PA-MMP actions may contribute to extracellular proteolysis that mediates parenchymal and angiogenic recovery after brain injury. As the mechanisms of deleterious vs. potentially beneficial PA and MMP actions become better defined, it is hoped that new therapeutic targets will emerge for ameliorating the sequelae of brain injury and inflammation.