Steroid hormone receptor levels and adjuvant tamoxifen in early breast cancer

Summary Ten year disease-free survival (DFS) results of the Naples randomized trial of adjuvant tamoxifen (TM), 30 mg per day for 2 years versus no therapy according to receptor levels, are reported. From Feb. 1, 1978, through Dec. 31, 1983, 308 pre- and postmenopausal patients with early breast cancer entered the trial. Estrogen receptor (ER) data were available on 239 (77.6%) patients, progesterone receptor (PgR) data on 194 (63.0%), and both receptor data on 181 (58.8%).ER and PgR were assayed by dextran-coated charcoal technique in a single laboratory. The effect of adjuvant TM was significantly related to ER and PgR concentration of the primary tumor. The greatest TM benefit on DFS was evident in patients with the highest levels of receptors. The interaction between the treatment effect and receptor concentration was found whether ER and PgR were considered separately or together. Address for reprints: A. Raffaele Bianco, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Naples Medical School II, via S. Pansini, 5-80131 Naples, Italy     

The Stockholm trial on adjuvant tamoxifen in early breast cancer

Summary The paper presents interim results of an on-going randomized trial of adjuvant tamoxifen (40 mg daily for 2 years) versus no endocrine adjuvant therapy in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer. A total of 1407 patients were included in the study between November 1976 through June 1984. Estrogen receptor (ER) data were available on 1184 patients (84%). The median follow-up was 53 months. Adjuvant tamoxifen increased the recurrence-free interval (P<0.01) but had no significant effect on overall survival. Treatment failures were reduced by 25% (P<0.01) and deaths by 7% (P>0.05). Tamoxifen mainly decreased the frequency of loco-regional recurrence whereas distant metastases were less affected. The treatment effect was independent of tumor stage but was significantly related to the estrogen receptor (ER) content of the primary tumor. Tamoxifen appeared ineffective among ER negative patients, and the greatest effect was seen among those with high levels of ER. The results indicate that the main mechanism of action of adjuvant tamoxifen is similar to that suggested in advanced disease, i.e. an interaction with the estrogen receptor.     

Results of two or five years of adjuvant tamoxifen correlated to steroid receptor and S-phase levels

A Swedish cooperative trial demonstrated that 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen was more beneficial than 2 years of tamoxifen in the treatment of postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER) positive, early stage, invasive breast cancer. The main aim of the present study was to investigate the importance of progesterone receptor (PgR) and ER concentration levels for patients participating in the trial and still distant recurrence free two years after the primary operation. Subgroup analyses revealed that only patients with ER positive and PgR positive breast cancer had improved distant recurrence free survival (DRFS) by prolonged tamoxifen therapy (p=0.0016). Patients with ER negative and PgR negative as well as ER positive and PgR negative tumors showed no significant effect of prolonged tamoxifen (p=0.53 and p=0.80, respectively). The percentage of ER negative and PgR positive breast cancers was too small (2.2%) for any meaningful subgroup analysis. There was a significant positive trend that the concentration level of PgR (high positive vs. low positive vs. negative) decreased the recurrence rate for those with prolonged therapy. No corresponding pattern was found for the ER content. S-phase fraction did not correlate to the recurrence rate of PgR positive breast cancers. Patients recurring during tamoxifen therapy had receptor negative tumors to a greater extent than those recurring after tamoxifen treatment.In conclusion, prolonged tamoxifen therapy for 5 years instead of 2 years was found to be beneficial for patients with ER positive and PgR positive breast cancer, whereas three extra years of tamoxifen had little or no effect for patients with ER positive but PgR negative tumors as well as for steroid receptor negative patients.     

Tumor-proliferative activity, progesterone receptor status, estrogen receptor level, and clinical outcome of estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer

The relations among pretreatment tumor-proliferative activity, progesterone receptor (PgR) status, estrogen receptor (ER) level, and clinical outcome were analyzed in a series of 45 ER-positive advanced breast cancer postmenopausal women treated with tamoxifen (20 mg/day) until disease progression. Tritiated thymidine ([3H]dThd) Labeling Index (LI) by autoradiographic assay was utilized for proliferative activity analysis, whereas the dextran-coated charcoal method was used for ER and PgR evaluation (cutoff value, 10 fmol/mg of protein cytosol). The median [3H]dThd LI value was 1.8%; 73% of cases were PgR positive, and 53% were highly ER positive (greater than 100 fmol/mg of protein cytosol). Clinical responses were more frequently observed in slowly than in quickly proliferating tumors (86% versus 60%; P less than 0.05) but were similar for PgR-positive and -negative cases, as well as for those with high and low ER positivity. Only [3H]dThd LI was found to individualize patients with different survival rates (at 40 mo of follow-up, 78% versus 40% in slowly and quickly proliferating tumors, respectively). The [3H]dThd LI, monitored in ten patients by a second tumor biopsy after 14 days of tamoxifen therapy, was found to have a significantly lower median value (P = 0.03). These data indicate that pretreatment [3H]dThd LI provides information, which is not available in a study of PgR and ER status, on the clinical outcome of ER-positive advanced breast cancer patients treated by hormone therapy.     

Relationship of PS2 with response to tamoxifen therapy in patients with recurrent breast cancer.

PS2, an oestrogen-inducible protein, was measured in the cytosol of 230 primary tumours from patients who were subjected to first-line tamoxifen therapy for advanced disease without prior adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen. PS2 correlated positively with oestrogen receptor (ER, P < 0.01) and progesterone receptor content (PgR, P < 0.001), and with the length of progression-free survival (PFS, P = 0.05). Although not statistically significant, higher levels of PS2 (> or = 10 ng mg-1 protein) were also associated with increased probability of response to tamoxifen treatment and a longer total post-relapse survival (PRS). ER, PgR, menopausal status, site of disease and prior adjuvant chemotherapy were all associated with response to tamoxifen therapy and with PFS. In multivariate analysis for PFS, low levels of ER and PgR, visceral metastasis, a disease-free interval of less than 1 year and prior adjuvant chemotherapy were all significantly associated with an increased probability of a rapid disease progression after start of tamoxifen therapy. In the subset of 83 tumours with intermediate levels of ER and PgR (both > or = 10, but not both > or = 75 fmol mg-1 protein), PS2 was positively related with the length of PFS (P < 0.01) and PRS (P < 0.05). PS2 remained the strongest factor in multivariate analysis for PFS (P < 0.01) in this ER/PgR intermediate subgroup, but was not of predictive value in univariate or multivariate analysis for both PFS and PRS in tumours classified as ER/PgR low or high (> or = 75 fmol mg-1 protein). It is concluded that PS2 status may be used as a parameter, additional to ER and PgR, for better refinement of prediction of response to tamoxifen treatment in advanced breast cancer patients especially with intermediate ER/PgR levels in their primary tumour.     

Lack of G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) in the plasma membrane is associated with excellent long-term prognosis in breast cancer

G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER), or GPR30, is a membrane receptor reported to mediate non-genomic estrogen responses. Tamoxifen is a partial agonist at GPER in vitro. Here, we investigated if GPER expression is prognostic in primary breast cancer, if the receptor is treatment-predictive for adjuvant tamoxifen, and if receptor subcellular localization has any impact on the prognostic value. Total and plasma membrane (PM) GPER expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry in breast tumors from 742 postmenopausal lymph node-negative patients subsequently randomized for tamoxifen treatment for 2–5 years versus no systemic treatment, regardless of estrogen receptor (ER) status, and with a median follow-up of 17 years for patients free of event. PM GPER expression was a strong independent prognostic factor for poor prognosis in breast cancer without treatment-predictive information for tamoxifen. In the tamoxifen-treated ER-positive and progesterone receptor (PgR)-positive patient subgroup, the absence of PM GPER (53 % of all ER-positive tumors) predicted 91 % 20-year distant disease-free survival, compared to 73 % in the presence of GPER (p = 0.001). Total GPER expression showed positive correlations with ER and PgR and negative correlation with histological grade, but the correlations were biphasic. On the other hand, PM GPER expression showed strong negative correlations with ER and PgR, and strong positive correlation with HER2 overexpression and high histological grade. GPER overexpression and PM localization are critical events in breast cancer progression, and lack of GPER in the PM is associated with excellent long-term prognosis in ER-positive and PgR-positive tamoxifen-treated primary breast cancer.     

Randomized trial of adjuvant tamoxifen in node negative postmenopausal breast cancer. Stockholm Breast Cancer Study Group.

The paper presents long-term results of a randomized trial of adjuvant tamoxifen (40 mg daily for 2 or 5 years) versus surgery alone including 1,347 postmenopausal patients with histologically negative axillary nodes and a tumour diameter less than or equal to 30 mm. Data on the estrogen receptor status of the primary tumour were available in 1,136 patients (84%). At a median follow-up of 7 years (range 1.7-13.0 years) there was a significant prolongation of the recurrence-free survival among those allocated to tamoxifen (p less than 0.01), significantly fewer deaths due to breast cancer (p = 0.02) and a trend towards improved overall survival (p = 0.11). The treatment benefit was restricted to patients with ER-positive tumours. There was no significant reduction of breast cancer recurrences in the tamoxifen group among patients whose tumours were classified as ER-negative. The results support and extend previous studies in showing a long-term benefit of tamoxifen in postmenopausal breast cancer patients with node-negative, estrogen receptor positive disease.     

Hormone receptor status of a contralateral breast cancer is independent of the receptor status of the first primary in patients not receiving adjuvant tamoxifen.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the hormone receptor status of the primary breast cancer (PBC) is predictive of the hormone receptor status of the subsequent contralateral breast cancer (CBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified patients in our database with known estrogen receptor (ER; n = 193) and/or progesterone receptor (PgR; n = 178) status in their PBC and in their subsequent CBC. One hundred twenty-six of these patients had received no adjuvant therapy, 34 had received adjuvant tamoxifen, and 33 had received adjuvant chemotherapy alone. The median interval between the first diagnosis of PBC and the development of the subsequent CBC was 3 years. ER and PgR assays were assessed biochemically in two central reference laboratories using identical quality-controlled ligand-binding methods. RESULTS: Among systemically untreated patients (n = 126), 88% of patients with ER-positive PBC and 75% of patients with ER-negative PBC developed an ER-positive CBC (P = .11). Among the tamoxifen-treated patients, those with an ER-positive PBC were almost equally likely to develop an ER-positive (47%) or ER-negative (53%) CBC (P = .99). PgR status was similar. In the untreated group (n = 112), 59% of patients with a PgR-positive PBC and 66% with a PgR-negative PBC developed a PgR-positive CBC (P = .48). Among tamoxifen-treated patients (n = 33), 50% of patients with a PgR-positive PBC versus 27% of patients with a PgR-negative PBC developed a PgR-positive CBC (P = .28). CONCLUSION: ER and PgR status of the primary tumor does not predict the hormone receptor status of the subsequent CBC in the absence of selective pressure of adjuvant therapy. Thus, other reasons should be considered to clarify the failure of tamoxifen to reduce the incidence of CBC in patients with a receptor-negative PBC.     

Preclinical and clinical experience with fulvestrant (Faslodex) in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer

Fulvestrant (Faslodex) is a new type of estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist that binds, blocks, and degrades the ER, leading to reduced expression of the progesterone receptor (PgR). Unlike the selective ER modulator tamoxifen, fulvestrant is devoid of any known agonist activity. Fulvestrant has a steroidal structure that competitively binds to the ER with an affinity much greater than that of tamoxifen. After binding to fulvestrant, degradation of the ER is accelerated, ultimately resulting in a reduction in cellular ER. Immunohistochemical studies have demonstrated that a single intramuscular injection of fulvestrant results in a dose-dependent decrease in ER and PgR indices and in Ki-67 expression. At the approved 250 mg dose, the decrease in receptor positivity with fulvestrant treatment was greater than that with tamoxifen. Phase III clinical trials have demonstrated the clinical benefit of fulvestrant in the endocrine treatment of breast cancer. Among patients who progressed during adjuvant or first-line endocrine therapy, fulvestrant was at least as effective as anastrozole as second-line treatment for the primary endpoints of objective response and time to progression, and was well tolerated. After a median follow-up of 24.5 months, a combined survival analysis from two Phase III studies has shown that fulvestrant may be considered similar to anastrozole for time to death (27.4 months versus 27.7 months, respectively). For the first-line therapy of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women, fulvestrant was shown to be active and well tolerated in a trial that compared fulvestrant 250 mg once monthly and tamoxifen 20 mg once daily. Treatment with fulvestrant has also demonstrated clinical efficacy among patients who progressed following treatment with tamoxifen followed by nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors. The efficacy of fulvestrant in sequential endocrine therapy and in combination with other agents appears promising and active investigations are ongoing to explore the clinical potential of this novel antiestrogen.     

Prognostic significance of progesterone receptor levels in estrogen receptor-positive patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with tamoxifen: results of a prospective Southwest Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) protocol 8228 is a prospective trial designed to investigate the prognostic significance of progesterone receptor (PgR) levels in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer patients who were treated with tamoxifen. This study was undertaken because the value of PgR measurements in advanced breast cancer had been assessed previously only in studies that were small, retrospective, or included heterogeneously treated patients. METHODS: Receptor assays were performed only in the laboratories that met strict quality control guidelines. Of the 398 patients entered, 342 patients were eligible and assessable for the study end points of objective clinical response, time to treatment failure, and overall survival. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis shows that elevated PgR levels significantly and independently correlated with increased probability of response to tamoxifen, longer time to treatment failure, and longer overall survival. Overall response rate (defined as complete response [CR], partial response [PR], or stable disease [SD] for greater than 6 months) in this trial was 54%. Response rates to tamoxifen were 43%, 53%, and 61% in subsets of patients with less than 10, 10 to 99, and more than 100 fmol/mg PgR, respectively. Exploratory subset analysis using PgR and other prognostic variables identified ER-positive patient subsets with response rates to tamoxifen ranging from 24% (premenopausal patients) to 86% (postmenopausal patients with ER greater than 38 and PgR greater than 329 fmol/mg). No groups of ER-positive patients were identified who had such a low response rate as to absolutely preclude considering the use of tamoxifen. Multivariate analysis showed the independent, statistically significant predictors were: for response to tamoxifen, menopausal status, PgR, and ER; for time to treatment failure, menopausal status, disease-free interval (DFI), PgR, and ER; and for overall survival DFI, PgR, ER, site of disease, and history of adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSION: We conclude that knowledge of PgR levels together with other clinical information can improve the pretreatment assessment of ER-positive breast cancer patients with metastatic disease.     

Retrospective analysis of time to recurrence in the ATAC trial according to hormone receptor status: an hypothesis-generating study.

PURPOSE: Arimidex, tamoxifen alone, or in combination (ATAC) trial of anastrozole (Arimidex) versus tamoxifen or a combination of the two in 9,366 postmenopausal patients with primary breast cancer found a significant improvement in disease-free survival and time to recurrence (TTR) for anastrozole compared with tamoxifen, that was restricted to patients with hormone receptor-positive (ie, estrogen receptor-positive [ER+] and/or progesterone receptor-positive [PgR+]) disease, the target population for these therapies. We retrospectively tested the hypothesis that this benefit might differ according to PgR status. PATIENTS AND METHODS: TTR was compared between the three treatment groups for subgroups defined by ER and PgR status using Cox's proportional hazards model, with and without adjustment for baseline variables. RESULTS: The unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for anastrozole versus tamoxifen for TTR was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.87) for women with either ER+ or PgR+ tumors. In the ER+/PgR+ subgroup (n = 3,834) the HR was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.69 to 1.02) compared with 0.43 (95% CI, 0.31 to 0.61) in the ER+/PgR-negative (PgR-) subgroup (n = 880). In the adjusted model the HRs were 0.83 and 0.45, respectively. CONCLUSION: Time to recurrence was longer for anastrozole- than tamoxifen-treated patients in both ER+/PgR+ and ER+/PgR- subgroups, but the benefit was substantially greater in the PgR- subgroup. As this was an "exploratory" analysis, this effect should be considered as hypothesis generating and assessed prospectively in other trials comparing the adjuvant use of an aromatase inhibitor with tamoxifen.     

Comparison of immunohistochemical and biochemical assay of steroid receptors in primary breast cancer--clinical associations and reasons for discrepancies

Estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) status was analysed in paraffin-embedded breast cancer material with immunohistochemical (IHC) technique and compared with corresponding analyses in cytosols (CYT). ER showed the same status (positive/negative) with both methods in 88% of the samples (352/402). The concordance was also high for PgR status (81% [321/394]). Besides values near cut-off, heterogeneity in the distribution of receptor positive and negative nuclei within a tumour sample was the main reason for discordances. Histological type, presence of sclerosis, necrosis and non-invasive cells, and technical artefacts seem to be of only limited importance for explaining discordances All patients have been treated with adjuvant tamoxifen for two years. The two subgroups, which were ER(CYT)+/ ER(IHC) + or ER(CYT)-/ER(IHC) +, both had a significantly better progression-free survival (PFS; median follow-up: almost 6 years) than the ER(CYT)-/ER(IHC)- group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.007, respectively). The remaining group, ER(CYT)+/ER(IHC)-, had an intermediate PFS. For PgR, the associations with PFS were weaker, with significantly better PFS than the PgR(CYT)-/PgR(IHC)- group being found only for the PgR(CYT) +/PgR(IHC)- group (p = 0.03).     

Prognostic value of estrogen and progesterone receptors in primary breast cancer

Estradiol receptor alone or estradiol and progesterone receptors (ER, PgR) have been measured in tumors from 307 women who were treated for primary breast adenocarcinoma. Patients received adjuvant therapy in relation to tumor stage independently of receptor status. Over a relatively short follow-up, more recurrences are recorded in patients with ER+ tumors, but at 7 years the same proportion of recurrences are registered in both groups of patients whose tumors were ER+ or ER-. Patients whose tumors were processed for both ER and PgR (148 cases) have now been evaluated after 5 years follow-up. Among 56 patients with PgR+ tumors 5 recurred, versus 22/92 in the PgR- group. 21/87 patients who had 1 to 4 invaded nodes at the time of surgery relapsed: 17/54 had PgR- tumors versus 4/33 PgR+. 6 recurrences were recorded in the 61 patients with negative nodes: 5 of them occurred in patients with PgR- tumors. In addition, recurrences observed in patients with negative receptor status occurred after a shorter disease-free interval. Analysis of the incidence of recurrences in relation to the combined ER/PgR status in patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy suggests that tumor PgR content is a more significant criterion than ER for long-term prognosis.     

Benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in primary breast cancer patients according oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, EGF receptor and HER2 status.

BACKGROUND: Most women with oestrogen receptor (ER) positive primary breast cancer receive adjuvant tamoxifen after surgery. The measurement of tumour biomarkers should allow better selection of patients for such treatment or for therapies such as aromatase inhibitors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Histopathological blocks of primary breast cancer patients who had been randomized to receive 2-years tamoxifen or no adjuvant therapy in two mature randomised clinical trials were retrieved. Immunohistochemical staining for ER, progesterone receptor (PgR), HER2 and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) was undertaken. The primary endpoint was relapse free survival. RESULTS: 813 patients were included in the study. Benefit from tamoxifen was seen in ER-positive patients [Relative risk (rr) 0.77, ci 0.63-0.93]. ER-negative patients also showed a strong trend to benefit from tamoxifen (rr 0.73, ci 0.52-1.02) which was largely confined to the PgR-positive group. Amongst the ER-positive group, PgR-positive and PgR-negative patients showed similar benefit (rr 0.81; ci 0.65-1.02 and 0.70; ci 0.49-0.99, respectively). Patients positive for HER2 did not benefit significantly (rr 1.14; ci 0.75-1.73) but this group was small. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of PgR status in ER-negative patients defines a group of patients that benefit from tamoxifen but would be excluded from tamoxifen therapy on the basis of ER status alone. The data are consistent with HER2 positive tumours being resistant to tamoxifen.     

The predictive value of estrogen and progesterone receptors' concentrations on the clinical behavior of breast cancer in women. Clinical correlation on 547 patients

The aims of this study were as follows: to confirm that the presence of estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR) receptors is an indicator of clinical behavior of human breast cancer independent of other known prognostic factors; to seek clinical correlates of those receptor values that best predict the overall disease evolution; and to determine the relative prognostic importance of PgR versus ER. The clinical records of 547 patients, the follow-up of some extending to 6 years, were analyzed in retrospect. Patients were placed into one of four disease stages and also in three groups according to the degree of axillary node involvement. In each group the prognostic value of receptors for patient survival, disease-free interval and, in case of metastasis or local recurrence, the response to endocrine treatment or chemotherapy were studied. The break point in the spectrum of receptor concentrations with regard to survival, disease-free interval, and response to treatment was greater than or equal to 20 for ER+, greater than or equal to 15 for PgR+, and less than 5 for both ER- and PgR- reported in fmol/mg protein. Survival and disease-free interval showed positive correlations with ER and PgR (P less than 0.001-less than 0.0003). When disease stage or node involvement were considered, these correlations were found essentially in Stage II and node involvement in more than three nodes, where patients had longer survival and disease-free interval if ER and PgR were positive (P less than 0.05-less than 0.0003). Estrogen receptor was a more sensitive prognostic indicator than PgR, and the combination ER+/PgR+ showed a correlation equivalent to ER+/PgR-. The correct prediction percentages of the response of patients to endocrine treatment were 77% if ER+, 69% if PgR+, and 79% if both ER+ and PgR+. However, the correct prediction percentage of the response to chemotherapy was of 50%. These results show that ER and PgR are prognostic factors for survival and disease-free interval mainly on patients at Stage II and node involvement of greater than three, with ER demonstrating a better predictive value than PgR. The measurement of these receptors provides a prognostic index for response to endocrine therapy but is without value in predicting the response to chemotherapy.     

Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR), by ligand-binding assay compared with ER, PgR and pS2, by immuno-histochemistry in predicting response to tamoxifen in metastatic breast cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group Study

Results of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) ligand-binding assays (LBAs) are strongly correlated with ER and PgR by immuno-histochemistry (IHC). To investigate whether ER and PgR by IHC are also strongly correlated with tamoxifen response, time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS), the results of the 2 methods were directly compared in 205 patients with ER(+) metastatic breast cancer treated with daily tamoxifen (Southwest Oncology Group protocol 8228) with 9 years median follow-up. pS2, another estrogen-regulated molecule, was also analyzed. Tumors were scored for IHC from 0 to 5, according to the proportion of positively stained cells. These IHC scores for both ER and PgR were significantly associated with LBA levels (p < 0.001). There was a significant direct relationship between higher IHC ER, PgR and pS2 and increasing response to tamoxifen. TTF and OS were also significantly longer for patients with higher ER or PgR, but not pS2, IHC scores. Low, intermediate and high ER or PgR categories showed similar differences in response rates whether defined by LBA or IHC. In logistic regression models which included ER, PgR and pS2 by IHC; ER and PgR by LBA; and menopausal status, only ER (IHC) and pS2 (IHC) retained significance for predicting tamoxifen response (p = 0. 02 and p = 0.005, respectively), along with menopausal status (for PgR by IHC, p = 0.09). Increasing ER and PgR by IHC, as by LBA, are thus significantly associated with a progressively better response and longer survival in ER(+) metastatic breast cancer. pS2 is also predictive in this setting.     

Letrozole inhibits tumor proliferation more effectively than tamoxifen independent of HER1/2 expression status

BACKGROUND: The biological basis for the superior efficacy of neoadjuvant letrozole versus tamoxifen for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive locally advanced breast cancer was investigated by analyzing tumor proliferation and expression of estrogen-regulated genes before and after the initiation of therapy. METHODS: Tumor samples were obtained at baseline and at the end of treatment from 185 patients participating in a double blind randomized Phase III study of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy. These paired specimens were simultaneously analyzed for Ki67, ER, progesterone receptor (PgR), trefoil factor 1 (PS2), HER1 (epidermal growth factor receptor), and HER2 (ErbB2 or neu) by semiquantitative immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: The treatment-induced reduction in geometric mean Ki67 was significantly greater with letrozole (87%) than tamoxifen (75%; analysis of covariance P = 0.0009). Differences in the average Ki67 reduction were particularly marked for ER-positive tumors that overexpressed HER1 and/or HER2 (88 versus 45%, respectively; P = 0.0018). Twenty-three of 92 tumors (25%) on tamoxifen and 14 of 93 on letrozole (15%) showed a paradoxical increase in Ki67 with treatment, and the majority of these cases was HER1/2 negative. Letrozole, but not tamoxifen, significantly reduced expression of the estrogen-regulated proteins PgR and trefoil factor 1, regardless of HER1/2 status (P < 0.0001). ER down-regulation occurred with both agents, although levels decreased more with tamoxifen (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Letrozole inhibited tumor proliferation to a greater extent than tamoxifen. The molecular basis for this advantage appears complex but includes possible tamoxifen agonist effects on the cell cycle in both HER1/2+ and HER1/2- tumors. A pattern of continued proliferation despite appropriate down-regulation of PgR expression with estrogen deprivation or tamoxifen was also documented. This observation suggests the estrogenic regulation of proliferation and PgR expression may be dissociated in endocrine therapy resistant cells.     

Potential predictive value of Bcl-2 for response to tamoxifen in the adjuvant setting of node-positive breast cancer

Approximately 50% of patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer (BC) and 70%-80% of patients with ER-positive and progesterone receptor (PgR)-positive BC respond to hormonal therapy. Additional predictive markers are needed. A group of 287 patients with ER- and/or PgR-positive tumors was selected from 804 patients previously enrolled in a multicenter phase III trial. Bcl-2 expression was evaluated and correlated with response to adjuvant tamoxifen and survival. Estrogen receptor and PgR were determined by biochemical means and Bcl-2 by immunohistochemistry. With a median follow-up of 76 months (95 relapses and 60 deaths), of the 287 patients with, 187 (65%) had Bcl-2-positive tumors and 78 of these patients received tamoxifen. Of the 100 patients with Bcl-2-negative disease, 51 received tamoxifen and 49 regular follow-up. Using patients treated with tamoxifen as a reference, a univariate analysis of disease-free interval for patients who did not receive tamoxifen showed a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.42 (95% CI, 0.82-2.44; P = 0.21) for patients with Bcl-2-positive disease and a HR of 1.05 (95% CI, 0.55-1.99; P = 0.89) for patients with Bcl-2-negative disease (P = 0.48). After adjusting for number of positive lymph nodes, degree of receptor and PgR positivity, and type of surgery, the HRs were 1.54 (95% CI, 0.87-2.73; P = 0.14) for Bcl-2-positive disease and 1.05 (95% CI, 0.52-2.11; P = 0.88) for Bcl-2-negative disease. Despite its being a retrospective nonrandomized study with a relatively low number of patients, our results suggest that Bcl-2 deserves further evaluation as a predictive factor of sensitivity to tamoxifen.     

The prognostic value and relationships of patient characteristics, estrogen and progestin receptors, and site of relapse in primary breast cancer

Estrogen and progestin receptor levels (ER and PgR) in tumors from 506 patients with primary breast cancer diagnosed in 1979, 1980, and 1981 were measured by a Scatchard plot analysis. At a median follow-up time of 3.5 years the prognostic value of the receptor levels was evaluated and compared with other tumor and patient characteristics. No relation was found between receptor levels and tumor, lymph node, metastasis (TNM) classification or location of the primary tumor. A significant positive rank correlation was observed between ER and PgR levels (rs = 0.57) and between ER level and age of the patients (rs = 0.39, P less than 0.001). The observed association between ER level and menopause status could not be maintained after correction for age. Independent prognostic factors for overall survival were tumor size (P = 0.002), the number of positive lymph nodes (P less than 0.001), age at primary surgery (P less than 0.001), the PgR level of the tumor (P less than 0.001), but not ER level. Independent prognostic factors for relapse were tumor size (P = 0.003), number of positive lymph nodes (P less than 0.001), age (P = 0.006), menopause status (P = 0.02), PgR level (P = 0.007), but not ER level. Finally, for death rate after relapse the following prognosticators were identified: size of the primary tumor (P = 0.03), number of positive lymph nodes (P = 0.03), age (P = 0.003), site of relapse (P less than 0.001), ER level (P = 0.02), and PgR level (P = 0.04). Patients with tumors containing low positive PgR levels (10 to 20 fmol/mg protein) had a slightly better prognosis than patients with PgR-negative tumors. It is concluded that the PgR level of the primary tumor is a better prognosticator than the ER level. The ER offered no additional ability for discriminating between low- and high-risk patients once PgR was included in the model. In contrast, PgR was capable of improving on the discriminating ability of ER. In addition, patients with tumors containing both PgR and ER showed the best prognosis. Therefore, it is recommended that ER and PgR should be assayed in all breast cancer biopsies.