Alkaline gastroesophageal reflux.

Twenty-four hour monitoring provides a continuous record of the pH of the lower esophagus in a near physiologic setting. The upper level of physiologic reflux was determined from the percentage of time and the number of episodes that the pH was less than 4 or more than 7 and the mean duration of each episode in fifteen asymptomatic subjects. One hundred patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux were divided into four groups on the basis of twenty-four hour pH monitoring: those with abnormal acid but normal alkaline reflux, termed acid refluxers (51 patients); those with both abnormal acid and alkaline reflux, termed acid-alkaline refluxers (25); those with normal acid and abnormal alkaline reflux, termed alkaline refluxers (6); and those with both normal acid and alkaline reflux, termed nonrefluxers (18).Nonrefluxers had a similar incidence of heartburn, regurgitation, and dysphagia as acid and acid-alkaline refluxers, proving the inaccuracy of symptoms for detecting reflux. Alkaline refluxers had a lesser incidence of heartburn but a greater incidence of regurgitation, and four alkaline reflux patients presented with severe pulmonary disease secondary to aspiration. Similar incidence and degree of esophagitis was seen in acid, acid-alkaline, and alkaline refluxers. All three groups of symptomatic refluxers had a mean distal esophageal sphincter pressure significantly lower than that of the control asymptomatic subjects. There was no difference in the distal esophageal sphincter pressure between controls and symptomatic nonrefluxers.Nine of the patients with acid-alkaline reflux and one of the patients with alkaline reflux underwent an antireflux procedure and were restudied three months postoperatively. All ten patients had a 24 hour pH acid score within normal limits, but two had an abnormal 24 hour pH alkaline score. In both patients, reflux was demonstrated after placing an acid load in the stomach.It is concluded that symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux in patients with an intact gastrointestinal tract is a mixture of both acid and alkaline secretions, with one or both abnormal due to different degrees of acid production and pyloric regurgitation. Patients with alkaline reflux may develop serious complications of reflux in the absence of typical symptoms of heartburn. Twenty-four hour pH monitoring of the esophagus is useful in the identification of these patients and in evaluating the ability of an antireflux procedure to control both abnormal acid and alkaline reflux.     

Spontaneous rupture and functional state of the esophagus.

Esophageal function was investigated after 1 to 8 years in five consecutive patients surviving spontaneous esophageal rupture (Boerhaave's syndrome) and treated by suturation. Only one patient was symptom free and had almost normal esophageal function as judged by manometry, 24-hour pH monitoring, endoscopy, and barium swallow. In the other four patients reflux symptoms and a severe functional disturbance of the esophagus were observed. In four patients the manometry revealed a lack of propulsive peristaltic movements and esophageal muscular incoordination (particularly in the upper part of the esophagus) closely mimicking those seen in the nonspecific esophageal motility disorder. In 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring a pathologic gastroesophageal reflux with long-lasting single reflux periods was observed, suggesting poor esophageal clearance. Also endoscopic and histologic signs of reflux esophagitis were seen in the same four patients. In contrast, lower esophageal sphincter pressure was normal in all five survivors. It is concluded that patients with spontaneous esophageal rupture have a severe disturbance of esophageal motility. The concomitant reflux esophagitis may be caused primarily by the esophageal motility disturbance, which may also contribute to the origin of the rupture.     

Typical GERD symptoms and esophageal pH monitoring are not enough to diagnose pharyngeal reflux

BACKGROUND: Abnormal pharyngeal reflux of acid (PR) (as measured by pH monitoring) is associated with microaspiration, and is a good predictor of airway symptom response to medical and surgical anti-reflux therapy. However, in clinical practice the link between airway disease and Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is still based on the presence of typical symptoms (e.g., heartburn) and/or standard esophageal function testing (manometry and 24-pH monitoring). PR is rarely measured directly. We undertook this study to determine if typical symptoms and standard testing could reliably predict the presence of PR. METHODS: The study group consisted of 518 patients with suspected reflux induced airway disease evaluated from December 1998 through January 2002. Each patient completed a standardized symptom questionnaire, underwent esophageal manometry, and 24-h esophageal and pharyngeal pH monitoring. Patients were classified having abnormal pharyngeal reflux (PR+) if they had >1 episode of PR detected during pH monitoring. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-one patients were PR+ and 337 were PR-. The most common symptoms, namely cough (PR +73%, PR- 68%), hoarseness (PR +64%, PR- 66%), and dyspnea (PR +59%, PR- 59%) were present with similar incidence in PR+ and PR- patients. The incidence of heartburn was 54% in the PR+ and 52% in the PR- patients. Logistic regression analysis revealed that abnormal esophageal acid exposure was a predictor of PR+ (P < 0.001). Neither the presence of heartburn or specific respiratory symptoms, the pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) or upper esophageal sphincter (UES), or amplitude of esophageal contractions predicted PR+. There was substantial variability in esophageal length (UES to LES), thus the placement of the distal pH probe from the LES varied considerably (median = 13 cm, 2-20 cm). Using established normal values of acid exposure at multiple levels of the esophagus, 24% of PR+ patients had normal amounts of esophageal acid exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Typical GERD symptoms, such as heartburn, and typical symptoms of aspiration such as hoarseness, cough, or dyspnea are not enough to positively identify PR. While patients with abnormal esophageal acid exposure are three times more likely than those with normal values to have PR, abnormal esophageal acid exposure alone does not identify all patients with PR. Therefore, relying on symptoms and standard diagnostic testing may fail to identify patients with extraesophageal reflux. Pharyngeal pH monitoring should be considered for patients with suspected reflux-induced airway disease.     

Esophageal manometry and 24-hour pH monitoring in the diagnosis of pulmonary aspiration secondary to gastroesophageal reflux.

Twenty-three consecutive patients who had persistent respiratory symptoms of unexplained etiology were evaluated to determine the presence of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and its relationship to their respiratory complaints. Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressures and the characteristics of the peristaltic waves in the proximal and distal esophagus were determined. Esophageal acid exposure 5 cm and 20 cm above the LES was measured using a pH probe with two antimony sensors. Aspiration was diagnosed when respiratory symptoms occurred during or within 3 minutes after a reflux episode, recorded at both levels of the esophagus. Based on these criteria, 12 patients were considered nonaspirators (group A), and 11 were categorized as aspirators (group B). Aspirators had: (1) lower LES pressure (6.1 +/- 3.1 versus 12 +/- 4.8 mm Hg, p less than 0.01); (2) decreased amplitude of peristalsis in the proximal esophagus (34 +/- 16 versus 59 +/- 21 mm Hg, p less than 0.01) and distal esophagus (46 +/- 25 versus 91 +/- 28 mm Hg, p less than 0.01), and higher incidence of simultaneous, nonperistaltic waves (30% versus 4%); and (3) lower UES pressure (44 +/- 23 versus 74 +/- 38 mm Hg). Impaired peristalsis in aspirators caused a higher acid exposure (11.4% +/- 8.0% versus 1.0% +/- 0.7% of time pH less than 4, p less than 0.01) and delayed clearance (5.5 +/- 6.5 versus 0.7 +/- 0.4 min) in the proximal esophagus. Our study shows that, in patients with respiratory symptoms of unexplained etiology, esophageal manometry and 24-hour pH monitoring will identify a subgroup of true aspirators. These patients suffer from a panesophageal motor dysfunction that affects all three barriers to aspiration: the LES, the esophageal "pump mechanism," and the UES.     

Esophageal dysmotility and gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) produces a spectrum of symptoms ranging from mild to severe. While the role of the lower esophageal sphincter in the pathogenesis of GERD has been studied extensively, less attention has been paid to esophageal peristalsis, even though peristalsis governs esophageal acid clearance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the following in patients with GERD: (1) the nature of esophageal peristalsis and (2) the relationship between esophageal peristalsis and gastroesophageal reflux, mucosal injury, and symptoms. One thousand six consecutive patients with GERD confirmed by 24-hour pH monitoring were divided into three groups based on the character of esophageal peristalsis as shown by esophageal manometry: (1) normal peristalsis (normal amplitude, duration, and velocity of peristaltic waves); (2) ineffective esophageal motility (IEM; distal esophageal amplitude < 30 mm Hg or >30% simultaneous waves); and (3) nonspecific esophageal motility disorder (NSEMD; motor dysfunction intermediate between the other two groups). Peristalsis was classified as normal in 563 patients (56%), IEM in 216 patients (21%), and NSEMD in 227 patients (23%). Patients with abnormal peristalsis had worse reflux and slower esophageal acid clearance. Heartburn, respiratory symptoms, and mucosal injury were all more severe in patients with IEM. These data show that esophageal peristalsis was severely impaired (IEM) in 21% of patients with GERD, and this group had more severe reflux, slower acid clearance, worse mucosal injury, and more frequent respiratory symptoms. We conclude that esophageal manometry and pH monitoring can be used to stage the severity of GERD, and this, in turn, should help identify those who would benefit most from surgical treatment.     

Factors affecting esophageal motility in gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND: There are conflicting data concerning the effect of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) on esophageal motor function. HYPOTHESIS: Duration of GERD might affect severity of symptoms, grade of esophageal mucosal injury, and esophageal motor behavior. DESIGN: Retrospective study of a defined cohort. SETTINGS: Two referral centers, one of them academic, for esophageal gastrointestinal motility disorders. PATIENTS: One hundred forty-seven patients with documented GERD. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Symptoms, grade of mucosal injury on esophagoscopy, esophageal manometry, ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring, and esophagogram. RESULTS: Patients with GERD had significantly decreased lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure (P =.02), lower amplitude of esophageal peristalsis at all levels of measurement (P<.001), and more delayed esophageal transit (P =.007) compared with control subjects. Patients with dysphagia, severe esophagitis, and Barrett esophagus presented with a longer history of the disease, significantly worse esophageal motor function (P<.01), and more prolonged esophageal transit than patients without the above features of the disease. Impairment of esophageal peristalsis and lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure were significantly inversely related to the duration of the disease (P<.001). Also, delay of esophageal transit was significantly related to the duration of the disease (P =.002) and inversely related to the amplitude of esophageal peristalsis (P<.001). Unlike the manometric variables, the extent of reflux, as assessed by ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring, was not related to the duration of the disease. CONCLUSION: A long history of GERD is more commonly associated with presence of dysphagia, delayed esophageal transit, severe esophagitis, presence of Barrett esophagus, and impaired esophageal motility.     

The prevalence of distal and proximal gastroesophageal reflux in patients awaiting lung transplantation

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and proximal extent of gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) in patients awaiting lung transplantation. BACKGROUND: GERD has been postulated to contribute to accelerated graft failure in patients who have had lung transplantations. However, the prevalence of reflux symptoms, esophageal motility abnormalities, and proximal esophageal reflux among patients with end-stage lung disease awaiting lung transplantation are unknown. METHODS: A total of 109 patients with end-stage lung disease awaiting lung transplantation underwent symptomatic assessment, esophageal manometry, and esophageal pH monitoring (using a probe with 2 sensors located 5 and 20 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter). RESULTS: Reflux symptoms were not predictive of the presence of reflux (sensitivity, 67%; specificity, 26%). Esophageal manometry showed a high prevalence of a hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter (55%) and impaired esophageal peristalsis (47%) among patients with reflux. Distal reflux was present in 68% of patients and proximal reflux was present in 37% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that in patients with end-stage lung disease: 1) symptoms were insensitive and nonspecific for diagnosing reflux; 2) esophageal motility was frequently abnormal; 3) 68% of patients had GERD; 4) in 50% of the patients with GERD, acid refluxed into the proximal esophagus. We conclude that patients with end-stage lung disease should be screened with pH monitoring for GERD.     

Mixed reflux of gastric and duodenal juices is more harmful to the esophagus than gastric juice alone. The need for surgical therapy re-emphasized.

OBJECTIVE: The author's goal was to determine the role of duodenal components in the development of complications of gastroesophageal reflux disease. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA: There is a disturbing increase in the prevalence of complications, specifically the development of Barrett's esophagus among patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Earlier studies using pH monitoring and aspiration techniques have shown that increased esophageal exposure to fluid with a pH above 7, that is, of potential duodenal origin, may be an important factor in this phenomenon. METHODS: The presence of duodenal content in the esophagus was studied in 53 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease confirmed by 24-hour pH monitoring. A portable spectrophotometer (Bilitec 2000, Synectics, Inc.) with a fiberoptic probe was used to measure intraluminal bilirubin as a marker for duodenal juice in the esophagus. Normal values for bilirubin monitoring were established for 25 healthy subjects. In a subgroup of 22 patients, a custom-made program was used to correlate simultaneous pH and bilirubin absorbance readings. RESULTS: Fifty-eight percent of patients were found to have increased esophageal exposure to gastric and duodenal juices. The degree of mucosal damage increased when duodenal juice was refluxed into the esophagus, in that patients with Barrett's metaplasia (n = 27) had a significantly higher prevalence of abnormal esophageal bilirubin exposure than did those with erosive esophagitis (n = 10) or with no injury (n = 16). They also had a greater esophageal bilirubin exposure compared with patients without Barrett's changes, with or without esophagitis. The correlation of pH and bilirubin monitoring showed that the majority (87%) of esophageal bilirubin exposure occurred when the pH of the esophagus was between 4 and 7. CONCLUSIONS: Reflux of duodenal juice in gastroesophageal reflux disease is more common than pH studies alone would suggest. The combined reflux of gastric and duodenal juices causes severe esophageal mucosal damage. The vast majority of duodenal reflux occurs at a pH range of 4 to 7, at which bile acids, the major component of duodenal juice, are capable of damaging the esophageal mucosa.     

Gastroesophageal reflux and pulmonary aspiration: incidence, functional abnormality, and results of surgical therapy.

The incidence of aspiration, the causative esophageal pathophysiology, and the results of surgical therapy were evaluated in 100 patients with abnormal gastroesophageal reflux documented by 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. Based on historical evidence, 48 patients were suspected to be aspirators. Eight patients had documented episodes of aspiration (drop on esophagela pH, followed by acid taste in mouth and onset of cough or wheezing spell) during the monitoring period. Nine patients were considered to be potential aspirators because they presented oral acid regurgitation without development of pulmonary symptoms. In five patients a primary respiratory disorder (PRD) induced gastroesophageal reflux. The remaining 78 patients had abnormal reflux without aspiartion or regurgitation. Aspirators had a 75% incidence of esophageal motor abnormality on manometry, and the clearance of refluxed acid was significantly delayed in the supine position. A history of heartburn and endoscopic evidence of esophagitis were present in only half of the patients who were documented aspirators. Potential aspirators were spared from aspiration by rapid esophageal clearance of refluxed acid unaffected by changes in body position. Patients with a PRD had higher distal esophageal segment (DES) pressure and normal esophageal motility with minimal esophagitis. Nonaspirators significantly improved their clearance while in the supine position, emphasizing the protective effect of esophageal peristalsis against aspiration. An antireflux procedure in five aspirators raised the DES pressure significantly and returned the reflux status to normal by 24-hour pH-monitoring standards. The incidence of aspiration appears to be less than that suspected by history and is due to a motor disorder that interferes with the ability of the esophagus to clear reflex acid. Abnormal pulmonary symptoms can induce or result from gastroesophageal reflux and, when the latter occurs, an antireflex procedure stops both reflux and aspiration.     

Alkaline gastroesophageal reflux: implications in the development of complications in Barrett's columnar-lined lower esophagus

Barrett's esophagus is a common finding in patients with gastroesophageal reflux and is associated with a high incidence of serious complications (stricture, ulceration, and carcinoma). The reason that only a portion of patients with reflux develop Barrett's esophagus and why some are prone to develop complications is unknown. Twenty-three patients with Barrett's esophagus underwent endoscopy, 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring, and manometry. Nine of these patients with gastritis underwent 24-hour gastric pH monitoring, and three with symptoms of duodenogastric reflux underwent 99mTc-labeled hepato-iminodiacetic acid scanning. Patients with complicated (n = 12) and uncomplicated (n = 11) Barrett's esophagus were compared with each other and with patients with reflux esophagitis (n = 53) and normal volunteers (n = 50). Patients with Barrett's esophagus showed an increased exposure to acid and alkaline gastric juice compared with patients with esophagitis and normal volunteers. In the patients with Barrett's esophagus with and without complications, there was no significant difference in age, incidence of defective lower esophageal sphincter, incidence of defective peristalsis, extent of the Barrett's epithelium, or percent time the esophageal pH was less than 4. In contrast, the percent time the esophageal pH was greater than 7 was significantly greater in patients with complications. This alkaline exposure is likely to be related to duodenogastric reflux. This was supported by positive gastric pH scores for duodenogastric reflux and 99mTc-labeled hepato-iminodiacetic acid scans in patients with Barrett's complications. These findings suggest that the development of complications in Barrett's esophagus is the result of the damaging effect of refluxed duodenal juice.     

Preoperative esophageal transit studies are a useful predictor of dysphagia after fundoplication

Fundoplication performed for gastroesophageal reflux disease may be complicated by postoperative dysphagia despite successful reduction in reflux symptoms. This is more likely in those patients with reflux who have concurrent esophageal dysmotility. The aim of this study was to establish whether esophageal transit studies using a technetium-99m jello bolus (jello esophageal transit) could detect the presence of motility disorders preoperatively and hence predict surgical outcome. Transit studies in 33 healthy volunteers yielded a normal range of 2 to 24 seconds using ninety-fifth percentile distribution. In the second phase of the study, 26 patients accepted for laparoscopic fundoplication were enrolled: jello esophageal transit, manometry, and endoscopy were attempted preoperatively in all subjects. A clinical dysphagia score was assigned from a questionnaire. Six months after surgery, five patients had dysphagia and of these four were found to have abnormal preoperative jello esophageal transit, for a sensitivity of 80%. Of the 21 patients who had no dysphagia after surgery, 20 patients had normal preoperative jello esophageal transit, showing a specificity of 95%. This esophageal transit study is noninvasive, reliable, and sensitive. When performed prior to fundoplication, it appears to be of significant value in detecting a subtle functional motility disorder that predisposes to postoperative dysphagia. Jello esophageal transit may assist the surgeon in planning treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Presented at the World Congress of Gastroenterology, Vienna, Austria, September 16, 1998 (poster presentation).     

Impedance technology for the management of esophageal disorders

Summary BACKGROUND: Esophageal impedance measurements are increasingly used to identify and quantify the presence of fluids in the esophagus. METHOD: A review of the available literature on clinical applications of impedance including combined impedance-manometry testing and combined impedance-pH monitoring is done. RESULTS: Combined impedance-manometry testing offers the opportunity to quantify esophageal bolus transit and clarifies the implications of esophageal motility abnormalities on esophageal function. This is of particular interest in patients with non-obstructive dysphagia and in patients with post-fundoplication dysphagia. Combined impedance-pH monitoring allows the detection of gastroesophageal reflux episodes independent of pH. This is of particular importance when evaluating patients with persistent symptoms on acid suppressive therapy. The ability to detect gastroesophageal reflux episodes with pH > 4 unfolds new questions on the optimal approach to patients with symptomatic non-acid reflux. CONCLUSIONS: Impedance technology allows the detection of fluid movements in the esophagus; further studies will determine the clinical utility of this new information.      

Frequency of abnormal esophageal acid exposure in patients eligible for bariatric surgery

BackgroundObesity and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are both high-prevalence diseases in developed nations. Obesity has been identified as an important risk factor in the development of GERD. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of abnormal esophageal acid exposure in patients candidate for bariatric surgery and its relationship with any clinical and endoscopic findings before surgery.MethodsData collected from a group of 88 patients awaiting bariatric surgery included a series of demographic variables and symptoms typical of GERD. The tests patients underwent included manometry, pH monitoring, and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted on the variables related to the onset of reflux.ResultsEsophageal pH monitoring tests were positive in 65% of the patients. Manometries showed lower esophageal sphincter hypotonia in 46%, while 20% returned abnormal upper endoscopy results. Out of the 45% of patients who were asymptomatic or returned normal endoscopies, half returned positive esophageal pH tests. In turn, among the 55% of patients who had symptoms or an abnormal upper endoscopy, three quarters had pH tests that diagnosed reflux. pH tests were also positive in 80% of symptomatic patients and 100% of patients with esophagitis (P<.042). No statistically significant relationship was found between body mass index, sex, age, manometry, or hiatus hernia and the positive pH monitoring.ConclusionFrequency of abnormal esophageal acid exposure among obese patients is high. There is a relationship between the presence of symptoms and reflux. But the absence of symptoms does not rule out the presence of abnormal esophageal function tests.     

Gastric emptying and gastroesophageal reflux: Effects of surgery and correlation with esophageal motor function

A new method of measuring gastric emptying for solids was developed and validated. With this new method, gastric emptying of solids was evaluated in 40 patients with gastroesophageal reflux. Gastric emptying of solids was delayed in 42 percent of patients independent of the severity of the reflux symptoms. Liquids emptied in a normal fashion, supporting the observations of others that liquid emptying is not a valid measure of gastric emptying. A high incidence of esophageal motor abnormalities was present in these patients when tested with radionuclide transit studies using a liquid bolus. The coexistence of esophageal and gastric emptying abnormalities was present in 45 percent of patients who had delayed gastric emptying of solids. Three months after surgical correction of reflux as measured by pH study, abnormalities in both the esophagus and stomach remained unchanged. Since the symptoms were corrected, delayed gastric emptying is not adequate indication for a gastric emptying procedure at the time of antireflux surgery.     

Helicobacter pylori is not associated with the manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

HYPOTHESIS: Helicobacter pylori is not associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complications, including adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: University tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Two hundred twenty-nine patients with symptoms suggestive of foregut disease underwent esophageal manometry, 24-hour pH monitoring, and upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy, with biopsy specimens obtained from the gastric antrum, the GEJ, and the distal esophagus. In these and in an additional 114 patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and the GEJ, the presence of H. pylori was determined by Giemsa stain. The presence of gastroesophageal reflux disease, defined by abnormal esophageal acid exposure, and its manifestations (carditis, erosive esophagitis, intestinal metaplasia limited to the GEJ, Barrett esophagus, and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and GEJ) were correlated with the presence of H. pylori. RESULTS: Helicobacter pylori was found on the biopsy specimens of the gastric antrum in 14.0% (32/229) of the patients with benign disease. It was not related to the features of gastroesophageal reflux disease, including abnormal esophageal acid exposure, erosive esophagitis, or Barrett esophagus. The presence of inflamed cardiac mucosa at the GEJ or carditis was inversely related to H. pylori infection and strongly associated with increased esophageal acid exposure. There was no association between the presence of intestinal metaplasia and H. pylori infection. Helicobacter pylori was found in 22 (19.3%) of the 114 patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma, which was not different from the prevalence of H. pylori in patients with benign disease. CONCLUSION: Helicobacter pylori plays no role in the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease or its complications.     

Symptoms are a poor indicator of reflux status after fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: role of esophageal functions tests

BACKGROUND: If a patient develops foregut symptoms after a fundoplication, it is assumed that the operation has failed, and acid-reducing medications are often prescribed. Esophageal function tests (manometry and pH monitoring) are seldom performed early in the management of these patients. HYPOTHESIS: In patients who are symptomatic after fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease, a symptom-based diagnosis is not accurate, and esophageal function tests should be performed routinely before starting acid-reducing medications. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: University hospital.Patients and METHODS: One hundred twenty-four patients who developed foregut symptoms after laparoscopic fundoplication (average, 17 months postoperatively) underwent esophageal manometry and pH monitoring. Sixty-two patients (50%) were taking acid-reducing medications. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative symptoms, use of antireflux medications, grade of esophagitis, esophageal motility, and DeMeester scores. RESULTS: Seventy-six (61%) of the 124 patients had normal esophageal acid exposure, while the acid exposure was abnormal in 48 patients (39%). Only 20 (32%) of the 62 patients who were taking acid-reducing medications had reflux postoperatively. Regurgitation was the only symptom that predicted abnormal reflux. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that (1) symptoms were due to reflux in 39% of patients only; (2) with the exception of regurgitation, symptoms were an unreliable index of the presence of reflux; and (3) 68% of patients who were taking acid-reducing medications postoperatively had a normal reflux status. Esophageal function tests should be performed early in the evaluation of patients after fundoplication to avoid improper and costly medical therapy.     

Gastroesophageal reflux disease: symptoms versus pH monitoring results.

OBJECTIVES: The reason why some patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have symptoms of upper aerodigestive system irritation, while others mainly have gastroenterologic symptoms, is not well established. This retrospective case series study was designed to examine the existence of a correlation between symptoms and reflux characteristics, based on data obtained from esophageal pH monitoring. METHODS: The study population consisted of 139 patients; 97 patients presented with laryngopharyngeal symptoms of GERD, including unexplained hoarseness, throat clearing, chronic cough, laryngospasm, globus, throat pain, and 42 patients presented with gastroenterologic symptoms, including heartburn and regurgitation. The results of 24-hour, double-channel ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring were analyzed comparing 2 symptom groups. The incidence of abnormal acid reflux at the upper and lower esophageal segments and the effects of upright and supine positions on reflux parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: The incidence of laryngopharyngeal reflux was significantly higher in the laryngopharyngeal symptom group than in the other (52% versus 38%). The patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux from both groups showed no significant differences in terms of number of acid reflux episodes, percentage of times pH was 4, and esophageal acid clearance. Upright and supine parameters did not show significant differences between the patient groups. Upright acid reflux episodes were, however, common in both groups at the lower esophageal and laryngopharyngeal segments. CONCLUSION: Recent studies suggesting that otolaryngologic patients commonly show upright, daytime reflux with normal esophageal clearance and that typical GERD patients commonly have supine, nocturnal reflux with prolonged esophageal clearance are not supported by this study. This study indicates that acid reflux parameters and positional changes are not sufficient to explain why patients with GERD experience different symptoms. The regional symptoms of GERD may be attributed to the impairment of epithelial resistance, motor activity, and buffering systems for the esophageal antireflux barrier.     

Long-term esophageal function following repair of esophageal atresia.

Primary repair of esophageal atresia restores gastrointestinal continuity, but does not ensure normal esophageal function. To date 22 patients, six to 32 (average 15) years after repair of their esophageal atresias, have been evaluated by personal interview and esophageal manometrics and acid reflux testing. Previous barium swallow examinations had demonstrated varying degrees of anastomotic narrowing (12 patients), abnormal esophageal motor function (11 patients), gastroesophageal reflux (two patients), and hiatal hernia (one patient). Ten patients experience intermittent dysphagia for solid foods. Seven have typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux. Esophageal function tests including manometry and intraesophageal pH recording, have demonstrated varying abnormalities of esophageal motility in 21 patients and moderate to severe gastroesophageal reflux in 13. Two patients have required reconstruction of the esophagogastric junction for control of severe reflux esophagitis. The unexpected high incidence of gastroesophageal reflux in these patients, coupled with their abnormal esophageal motility which impairs normal acid clearing, renders them more prone to reflux esophagitis. Careful long-term evaluation for gastroesophageal reflux and its complications is indicated following primary repair of esophageal atresia. Evaluation of esophageal function with intraesophageal pressure and pH recordings is a far more sensitive indicator of esophageal physiology than the barium swallow examination.     

The hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter: A motility disorder with manometric features of outflow obstruction

The aim of this study was to define the clinical presentation, motility characteristics, and prevalence and patterns of gastroesophageal reflux in patients with hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter (HTLES). HTLES was defined by a resting pressure measured at the respiratory inversion point on stationary manometry of greater than 26 mm Hg (ninety-.fth percentile of normal). One hundred consecutive patients (80 women, 20 men; mean age 54.7 years, range 23 to 89 years), diagnosed with HTLES at our institution between September 1996 and October 1999, were studied. Patients with achalasia or other named esophageal motility disorders or history of foregut surgery were excluded, but patients with both HTLESand ‘nutcracker esophagus’ were included. Themost commonsymptoms in patients withHTLES were regurgitation (75%), heartburn (71%), dysphagia (71%), and chest pain (49%). The most common primary presenting symptoms were heartburn and dysphagia. The intrabolus pressure, which is a manometric measure of Outflow obstruction, was significantly higher in patients with HTLES compared to normal volunteers. The residual pressure measured during LES relaxation induced by a water swallow was also significantly higher than in normal persons. There were no significant associations between any of the relaxation parameters studied (residual pressure, nadir pressure, duration of relaxation, time to residual pressure) and either the presence or severity of any symptoms or the presence of abnormal esophageal acid exposure. Seventy-three patients underwent 24-hour pH monitoring, and 26% had increased distal esophageal acid exposure. Compared to a cohort of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease but no HTLES (n _ 300), the total and supine periods of distal esophageal acid exposure were significantly lower in the patients with HTLES and abnormal acid exposure. Patients with HTLES frequently present with moderately severe dysphagia and typical reflux symptoms. Approximately one quarter of them have abnormal esophageal acid exposure on pH monitoring. Patients with HTLES have significantly elevated intrabolus and residual relaxation pressures on liquid boluses, suggesting that Outflow obstruction is present.     

Usefulness of combined gastric and esophageal pH monitoring in detecting gastroesophageal alkaline and mixed reflux

96 patients with 'typical' symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux were studied by means of combined gastric and esophageal pH monitoring. The aim was to assess the incidence of 'alkaline' and 'mixed' gastroesophageal reflux episodes as well as 'acid' reflux and their reciprocal relationship with esophagitis. 'Alkaline' gastroesophageal reflux was defined whenever the pH in the esophagus rose above 7, but only when there was a simultaneous or immediately previous rise of gastric pH to similar alkaline values resulting from duodenogastric reflux. 'Mixed' gastroesophageal reflux was defined whenever the pH in the esophagus dropped to 5.5-4.5, but only when there was a simultaneous or immediately previous rise of gastric pH above 4 related to duodenogastric reflux. Our data suggest that 'alkaline' gastroesophageal reflux is a rare phenomenon while 'mixed' gastroesophageal reflux episodes are present in 21% of these patients. 87% of patients with mixed reflux had esophagitis. Until analytical studies of refluxed material are available to clarify its composition, combined gastric and esophageal pH monitoring seems a useful test to correctly interpret the 'alkaline' and 'mixed' gastroesophageal reflux.