Congenital aortic stenosis: A novel technique for ventricular pacing during valvuloplasty

Objectives : The main objective of this study is to describe a new technique for rapid ventricular pacing to maintain balloon stability during balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) without using transvenous temporary pacemaker electrode. Background : The safety and efficacy of rapid right ventricular pacing to facilitate balloon stability during BAV has been previously reported. However, it necessitates an additional femoral venous access, an additional sheath, and a temporary pacemaker electrode. Methods : This was a prospective pilot study. Rapid ventricular pacing was performed through back‐up guidewires inserted into the left ventricle for balloon advancement and by an adhesive patch placed on the back of the patient. The technique was performed during BAV procedure in all of 15 consecutive children diagnosed as congenital aortic stenosis. Pacing was performed at a rate decreasing systolic aortic pressure to the point of 40–50% of baseline. Results : The technique was successful in all patients. Effective capture, stable pacing, and balloon stability were achieved in all children using very low outputs. No sustained arrhythmias or other procedure‐related complications occurred. Mean aortic valve gradient decreased from 68.5 ± 20.4 mm Hg to 20.4 ± 10.2 mm Hg. Degree of aortic regurgitation progressed from grade 0 to 1 in three patients and remained unchanged in 12 patients. Conclusions : This study demonstrated that back‐up guidewires can be used effectively and safely for pacing during BAV procedures. This technique omits probable complications related to a second vascular access and may shorten the procedure time and decreases costs by eliminating the use of an additional sheath and a temporary pacemaker electrode. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Use of a low‐profile,compliant balloon for percutaneous aortic valvuloplasty

Objectives : To determine the safety and immediate efficacy after balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) with a new, low‐profile balloon. Background : BAV has a continuing role in the management of high‐risk patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). BAV with traditional noncompliant balloons requires a large femoral arteriotomy and is associated with high rates of access site complications. Methods : We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 20 consecutive patients undergoing BAV for severe AS. Retrograde transfemoral BAV was performed with a low‐profile, compliant valvuloplasty balloon. Before and after BAV, transaortic gradients were measured invasively and by echocardiography, and aortic valve area (AVA) calculated. Access site complications, functional class and survival were recorded. Results : Patients were 79 ± 12 years old and had an estimated mortality from open aortic valve replacement of (12.5 ± 9.6)%. By catheterization, mean aortic gradient fell from 44 ± 15 to 29 ± 10 mm Hg (P < 0.001) and AVA increased from 0.63 ± 0.22 to 0.89 ± 0.33 cm² (P < 0.001). New York Heart Association functional class improved from 3.5 ± 0.7 to 2.7 ± 0.8. Procedural mortality was 0%. There were no vascular complications or significant worsening of aortic regurgitation. Conclusion : Transfemoral BAV using a low‐profile compliant balloon is feasible with acceptable immediate results and safety. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

“Double wire” angio‐seal closure technique after balloon aortic valvuloplasty

Objectives : To report the feasibility of a collagen‐mediated closure device using a modified Angio‐Seal closure technique for access site management following percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV). Background : With the advent of percutaneous aortic valve replacement therapies, there has been a resurgence of interest in BAV procedures. Vascular complications, including bleeding, are a common source of morbidity post procedure as a result of the requirement for large bore femoral artery access. The use of vascular closure devices may reduce bleeding complications. Methods : We describe a new technique for vascular closure in this setting. At the conclusion of the valvuloplasty procedure, two 0.035″ wires are inserted through the femoral artery sheath. A conventional collagen‐mediated closure device (8F Angio‐Seal) is deployed over the first wire and along side the second wire. If immediate hemostasis is not achieved, a second device is loaded onto the second wire and deployed to achieve hemostasis. Results : Percutaneous BAV was performed in 21 patients. Hemostasis was successfully achieved in all patients with either a single 8F Angio‐Seal closure device (18 patients) or after placement of a second device (three patients). Conclusions : The modified “Double Wire” Angio‐Seal technique is a feasible method for hemostasis following percutaneous BAV. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

High pacing rates for management of aortic insufficiency after balloon aortic valvuloplasty or transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Aortic insufficiency (AI) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is difficult to manage when associated with congestive heart failure. AI after balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) may be catastrophic, especially in patients who are not candidates for TAVR. We describe the use of urgent temporary pacing, followed by permanent pacing, to increase the heart rate to diminish diastolic filling time for the short term management of AI after BAV or TAVR. The strategy is particularly useful in patients who already have permanent pacemakers, which are common in this population. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Assessing the risk of an anomalous circumflex artery using balloon aortic valvuloplasty prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Anomalous origin of the left circumflex coronary artery from the right sinus of Valsalva or proximal right coronary artery (RCA) is a well‐known anatomic variation. Although the condition is usually benign, there is risk for compression of the anomalous artery by a prosthetic valve in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR). In more recent years, balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has been performed prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) to serve as a diagnostic tool in the evaluation of symptom relief and procedural risks prior to definitive therapy with TAVR. However, the literature regarding BAV utilization in the assessment of coronary artery anomalies prior to TAVR is scarce. Our case illustrates the importance of performing preoperative BAV to assess the safety of a TAVR procedure in patients with coronary anomalies. Herein, we present a case of a patient who underwent BAV with selective angiography of her anomalous circumflex artery. During balloon inflation, the anomalous circumflex artery was transiently occluded, with complete resolution with balloon deflation. Given these findings, the patient was deemed to be unsuitable for TAVR and offered surgical AVR. This case demonstrates that patients with anomalous coronary circulation may require BAV with selective angiography to fully evaluate risk of coronary occlusion with TAVR.     

Valvuloplasty balloon entrapment in a self‐expanding aortic valve stent frame after inadvertent wire passage through the outflow struts

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a leading‐edge therapy option for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and high surgical risk. However, this minimally invasive procedure is associated with specific complications that may be life‐threatening. Valvuloplasty balloon entrapment during postdilatation in transcatheter self‐expanding aortic valve stent frames has not yet been a focus of interest in this context. Although it is a rare event, it may critically influence outcome, and different management strategies can be considered. Hereafter, we present the case of a 67‐year‐old male who underwent transfemoral TAVR and subsequent postdilatation. The valvuloplasty balloon was entrapped in the self‐expanding aortic valve stent frame after inadvertent wire passage through the outflow struts. Since surgical risk was high, we preferred a percutaneous approach and extracted the entrapped balloon with high traction force under rapid pacing after valve stabilization with another balloon, which was placed in the annular position.     

Contemporary balloon aortic valvuloplasty: Changing indications and refined technique

Even if un to improve long-term prognosis, balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) may be useful in selected patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis either as a bridge to surgical or transcatheter valve replacement (aortic valve replacement [AVR] or transcatheter aortic valve implantation [TAVI]) or as a triage strategy for patients with uncertain indications. International guidelines recommend BAV as: a “bridge” to AVR/TAVI, a “trial” in patients with undetermined symptoms, or a “bridge-to-decision” in case of comorbidities. However, in clinical practice, BAV is also used as a palliative measure to improve hemodynamics and quality of life in many patients who are excluded from AVR/TAVI. Finally, BAV is often performed during TAVI to facilitate prosthesis delivery, optimize frame expansion, or for bioprosthetic valve fracture in selected valve-in-valve procedures. Technical innovations, which allow for a mini-invasive approach via transradial access and pacing delivered through the wire, have led to a decrease in complications over time. This review focuses on contemporary BAV with a specific emphasis on new indications, innovative techniques, and specific complex patient subgroups.     

Prior Balloon Valvuloplasty Versus Direct Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From the DIRECTAVI Trial

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate device success of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using new-generation balloon-expandable prostheses with or without balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV).BackgroundRandomized studies are lacking comparing TAVR without BAV against the conventional technique of TAVR with BAV.MethodsDIRECTAVI (Direct Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) was an open-label noninferiority study that randomized patients undergoing TAVR using the Edwards SAPIEN 3 valve with or without prior balloon valvuloplasty. The primary endpoint was the device success rate according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria, which was evaluated using a 7% noninferiority margin. The secondary endpoint included procedural and 30-day adverse events.ResultsDevice success was recorded for 184 of 236 included patients (78.0%). The rate of device success in the direct implantation group (n = 97 [80.2%]) was noninferior to that in the BAV group (n = 87 [75.7%]) (mean difference 4.5%; 95% confidence interval: −4.4% to 13.4%; p = 0.02 for noninferiority). No severe prosthesis-patient mismatch or severe aortic regurgitation occurred in any group. In the direct implantation group, 7 patients (5.8%) required BAV to cross the valve. Adverse events were related mainly to pacemaker implantation (20.9% in the BAV group vs. 19.0% in the direct implantation group; p = 0.70). No significant difference was found between the 2 strategies in duration of procedure, contrast volume, radiation exposure, or rate of post-dilatation.ConclusionsDirect TAVR without prior BAV was noninferior to the conventional strategy using BAV with new-generation balloon-expandable valves, but without procedural simplification. BAV was needed to cross the valve in a few patients, suggesting a need for upstream selection on the basis of patient anatomy. (TAVI Without Balloon Predilatation [of the Aortic Valve] SAPIEN 3 [DIRECTAVI]; NCT02729519)     

Unilateral Access Is Safe and Facilitates Peripheral Bailout During Transfemoral-Approach Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare the rate and trend of vascular complications when placing a second arterial sheath in the contralateral femoral artery during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) unilaterally versus bilaterally.BackgroundVascular complications occur in approximately 5% to 8% of TAVR procedures. Many operators place a second arterial sheath in the contralateral femoral artery to perform aortic root angiography. The authors surmised that placing the second sheath ipsilateral and distal to the delivery sheath would be an easier option with similar safety.MethodsThe Cleveland Clinic Aortic Valve Center TAVR database was accessed, and data for patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR (TF-TAVR) from January 2014 to December 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcome was the rate of peripheral vascular complications.ResultsA total of 1,208 patients who underwent TF-TAVR were included in this study. One thousand seven patients (83.36%) underwent bilateral femoral access, and 201 patients (16.64%) underwent TF-TAVR using a unilateral femoral approach. Over the study duration, use of the unilateral access approach trended upward significantly, reaching 43.7% of total cases in 2017. A gradual decline in access site–related vascular complications was observed, from 13.7% in 2014 to 7.4% in 2017. After propensity-score matching, peripheral vascular complications were similar between bilateral access and unilateral access (10.8% vs. 8.6%) (p = 0.543).ConclusionsThere was a significant decline in vascular complications from 2014 to 2017. Unilateral-access TF-TAVR provided similar safety compared with bilateral-access TF-TAVR and is a more accessible approach for managing access site–related complications and possibly achieving better patient satisfaction.     

经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄的术中投照角度预测值分析

目的在二叶式主动脉瓣(BAV)行经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)中,分析术前多排螺旋CT(MDCT)预测的最佳导丝跨瓣角度、球囊预扩张角度和瓣膜释放角度规律,总结三种投照角度预测值的规律。方法回顾性分析2019年7月至2020年6月在复旦大学附属中山医院因严重症状性重度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)而行TAVR的BAV患者31例。收集基线资料、术前评估和手术情况。使用MDCT预测TAVR最佳导丝跨瓣角度、球囊预扩张角度和瓣膜释放角度,按照横裂式BAV和纵裂式BAV分组,比较两组之间的差异和规律。结果最佳导丝跨瓣角度,横裂式BAV为右前斜(RAO)8°(18°,3°)、足位(CAU)25°(29°,17°),纵裂式BAV为左前斜(LAO)26°(21°,34°)、头位(CRA)13°(6°,22°),两者差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.001);最佳球囊预扩张角度(显示左冠状动脉开口),横裂式BAV为LAO 11°(9°,26°)、CRA 8°(1°,19°),纵裂式BAV为LAO 36°(30°,39°)、CRA 22°(14°,25°),两者差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);最佳球囊预扩张角度(显示右冠状动脉开口),横裂式BAV为LAO 48°(43°,60°)、CRA 26°(3°,29°),纵裂式BAV为LAO 48°(39°,70°)、CRA 25°(22°,33°),两者差异均无统计学意义(P=0.320、P=0.560);最佳瓣膜释放角度,横裂式BAV为RAO 12°(16°,4°)、CAU 25°(28°,19°),纵裂式BAV为LAO 21°(17°,26°)、CRA 3°(-2°,12°),两者差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.001)。结论术前MDCT可预测BAV行TAVR的最佳导丝跨瓣、球囊预扩张和瓣膜释放投照角度,这些角度与BAV为横裂式还是纵裂式相关,存在明显规律。     

Impact of Direct Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Without Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty on Procedural and Clinical Outcomes: Insights From the FRANCE TAVI Registry

Objectives

This study sought to describe the current practices and compare outcomes according to the use of balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) or not during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

The "Long-Sheath" Technique in Percutaneous Aortic Balloon Valvuloplasty

A new 100 cm long 16.5 French valvuloplasty introducer was used in 12 consecutive patients (mean age 73 years, five males and seven females) undergoing aortic balloon valvuloplasty for severe aortic stenosis. The long-sheath was introduced into the ascending aorta along the stiff part of an exchange guidewire. The valvuloplasty procedure, which included a complete diagnostic catheterization in three patients, lasted 113 ± 47 min (211 ± 81 min in the previous 18 procedures performed with a conventional approach, P < 0.05). Introduction of balloon catheters (3 × 12 mm trefoil balloon in the 12 cases and 2 × 19 mm bifoil balloon in 2 of these cases) was possible in all patients and an increased stability of the balloon during inflation was observed. No systemic embolization or vascular complications occurred at the puncture site. The long-sheath technique appears to be a valuable adjunct for aortic valvuloplasty in that it provides easier and quicker access for even the largest balloons and additional support and stability during balloon inflation. In our experience, this reduced the practical difficulties and the duration of the procedure.     

Complications after Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with a Balloon‐Expandable Prosthesis: The Importance of Preventative Measures and Contingency Planning

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with balloon‐expandable Edwards‐SAPIEN valve was superior to standard therapy in inoperable patients and noninferior to surgical aortic valve replacement in high surgical‐risk, but operable patients, with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis in the randomized controlled PARTNER trial. Since the first case of TAVR with a balloon‐expandable valve in 2002, several groups have reported their experience with balloon‐expandable valves with high‐procedural success. In the United States, the balloon‐expandable Edwards‐SAPIEN valve is the only transcatheter heart valve approved by the FDA for commercial use. Moreover, this is only in high‐risk inoperable patients. Despite increasing experience with the TAVR procedure, it can be associated with complications, which can be technically challenging, even for an experienced operator. Complications associated with TAVR include vascular complications, valve malpositioning, regurgitation, embolization, coronary compromise, conduction abnormalities, stroke/transient ischemic attack, acute kidney injury, cardiac tamponade, and hemodynamic collapse. A thorough understanding of the procedure is essential for pre‐emptive planning for procedural complications and early identification and management of complications are necessary for procedural success. We hereby review our experience of transfemoral TAVR with balloon‐expandable valves, offer practical tips to maximize the likelihood of procedural success, describe pre‐emptive strategies to prevent peri‐procedural complications and bailout measures to manage them, should they occur. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Predilatation for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Still have a role?

• Predilation with a balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) was the standard of care for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) until recently.
• Both the operators increased experiences as well as smaller device sizes and improved device designs have much improved omitting the use of BAV in majority of the cases in today's clinical practice.
• Predilation with BAV seems to help in selected group of patients with severe aortic leaflet calcium volumes to avoid post‐dilation.

     

Contemporary Use of Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty in the Era of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

The development of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has increased the use of balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) in treating aortic stenosis. We evaluated our use of BAV in an academic tertiary referral center with a developing TAVI program.We reviewed 69 consecutive stand-alone BAV procedures that were performed in 62 patients (mean age, 77 ± 10 yr; 62% men; baseline mean New York Heart Association functional class, 3 ± 1) from January 2009 through December 2012. Enrollment for the CoreValve^® clinical trial began in January 2011. We divided the study cohort into 2 distinct periods, defined as pre-TAVI (2009–2010) and TAVI (2011–2012). We reviewed clinical, hemodynamic, and follow-up data, calculating each BAV procedure as a separate case.Stand-alone BAV use increased 145% from the pre-TAVI period to the TAVI period. The mean aortic gradient reduction was 13 ± 10 mmHg. Patients were successfully bridged as intended to cardiac or noncardiac surgery in 100% of instances and to TAVI in 60%. Five patients stabilized with BAV subsequently underwent surgical aortic valve replacement with no operative deaths. The overall in-hospital mortality rate (17.4%) was highest in emergent patients (61%).The implementation of a TAVI program was associated with a significant change in BAV volumes and indications. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty can successfully bridge patients to surgery or TAVI, although least successfully in patients nearer death. As TAVI expands to more centers and higher-risk patient groups, BAV might become integral to collaborative treatment decisions by surgeons and interventional cardiologists.     

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty for severe aortic stenosis as a bridge to transcatheter/surgical aortic valve replacement

Objectives : This study aimed to determine success‐ and complication rates after balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) and the outcome of BAV as a standalone therapy versus BAV as a bridge to transcatheter/surgical aortic valve replacement (T/SAVR). Background : The introduction of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has led to a revival in BAV as treatment for patients with severe aortic stenosis. Methods : A cohort of 472 patients underwent 538 BAV procedures. The cohort was divided into two groups: BAV alone 387 (81.9%) and BAV as a bridge 85 (18.1%) to (n = 65, TAVR; n = 20, surgery). Clinical, hemodynamic, and follow‐up mortality data were collected. Results : There was no significant difference between the two groups in mean age (81.7 ± 8.3 vs. 83.2 ± 10.9 years, P = 0.18), society of thoracic surgeons score (13.1 ± 6.2 and 12.4 ± 6.4, P = 0.4), logistic EuroSCORE (45.4 ± 22.3 vs. 46.9 ± 21.8, P = 0.43), and other comorbidities. The mean increase in aortic valve area was 0.39 ± 0.25 in the BAV alone group and 0.42 ± 0.26 in the BAV as a bridge group, P = 0.33. The decrease in mean gradient was 24.1 ± 13.1 in the BAV alone group vs. 27.1 ± 13.8 in the BAV as a bridge group, P = 0.06. During a median follow up of 183 days [54–409], the mortality rate was 55.2% (n = 214) in the BAV alone group vs. 22.3% (n = 19) in the BAV as a bridge group during a median follow‐up of 378 days [177–690], P < 0.001. Conclusion : In high‐risk patients with aortic stenosis and temporary contraindications to SAVR/TAVR, BAV may be used as a bridge to intervention with good mid‐term outcomes. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty as a Bridge to Aortic Valve Replacement: A Contemporary Nationwide Perspective

ObjectivesThis study sought to use a national representative database to assess the incidence, predictors, and outcomes of balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) as a bridge to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in contemporary practice.BackgroundNationwide data on the use and outcomes of BAV as a bridge to TAVR are limited.MethodsPatients who underwent BAV between January and June in 2015 and 2016 were identified in the National Readmission Database. We assessed rate of subsequent TAVR following BAV, and predictors and timing of subsequent TAVR. We then identified a group of patients who had direct TAVR (without prior BAV) in the original 2015 to 2016 National Readmission Database dataset. We compared in-hospital outcomes following TAVR between patients with prior bridging BAV and those undergoing direct TAVR.ResultsAmong the 3,691 included patients 1,426 (38.6%) had subsequent TAVR. Timing of TAVR was pre-discharge in 7.4%, within 30 days in 35%, between 31 and 90 days in 47%, between 91 and 180 days in 14%, and >180 days in 4%. Negative predictors of subsequent TAVR included prior defibrillator (odds ratio [OR]: 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36 to 0.85), dementia (OR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.79), malnutrition (OR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.90), and malignancy (OR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.82). In propensity-score matched cohorts of patients who underwent direct TAVR versus those with prior BAV, in-hospital mortality during TAVR admission was similar (3.7% vs. 3.5%; p = 0.91). Major complications, length of stay, and discharge disposition were also comparable. However, cost of the hospitalization was higher in the direct TAVR group.ConclusionsAbout 40% of BAV patients undergo subsequent TAVR mostly within 90 days. In-hospital outcomes of TAVR in these patients were comparable with propensity-score matched patients who underwent TAVR without prior BAV. Further investigations are needed to define the role of BAV in contemporary practice.     

Distal radial access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: A state‐of‐the‐art review

Since its introduction by Lucien Campeau three decades ago, percutaneous radial artery approach at the forearm has been shown to provide advantages over the femoral approach and has become the standard approach for coronary angiography and intervention. Though infrequent, vascular complications still remain, mainly radial artery occlusion. Therefore, a more distal radial approach at the snuffbox or at the dorsum of hand has been suggested, initially by anethesiologists for perioperative patient monitoring, and more recently by Babunashvili et al. for retrograde radial artery recanalization of radial artery occlusion and then for coronary angiography and intervention. This distal radial approach has been advocated to reduce the risk of radial artery occlusion at the forearm (which precludes reintervention through the same access site) and bleeding and vascular access site complications, as well as to improve operator and patient comfort, especially when using left radial approach. This review describes in detail the anatomy of the radial artery at the wrist and the hand, the history of distal radial access, the rationale underlying use of this technique, the results published by experienced operators, the technique, the limitations, and potential role of this approach. This journey from the very proximal to the very distal part of the radial artery was indeed initiated and conceptualized by Lucien Campeau himself.     

Prophylactic Retrograde Distal Common Femoral Access as a Bail-out Strategy in Patients with Increased Risk for Femoral Access Complication During Transfemoral Aortic Valve Replacement

ObjectiveSeveral patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have complex peripheral arterial disease (PAD) that increases risk of vascular complications and failure of vascular closure device (VCD). Endovascular bailout of failed VCD is performed through contralateral femoral access. Further due to multiple different anatomic reasons the contralateral femoral access and “up and over” approach is unavailable for endovascular bailout of the VCD failure. We evaluated a novel bailout technique of obtaining an additional access in ipsilateral common femoral artery (CFA) or superficial femoral artery (SFA) distal to the main CFA access used for TAVR device.MethodsWe prospectively identified patients who were at high risk for VCD failure and had unavailable contralateral CFA approach from the pre-TAVR evaluation with multislice CT angiography. The data was collected prospectively for the TVT registry and retrospectively reviewed. All patients had an additional distal access obtained in the CFA or proximal SFA under direct fluoroscopy guidance after achieving main CFA access for TAVR. Using an inner 0.021″ micro-dilator from the 4-Fr micropuncture mini stick max access kit (AngioDynamics, Marlborough, MA) and a 200 cm long 0.018″ wire, the distal access was secured in place through the TAVR procedure. After completing the TAVR if the VCD gained successful hemostasis, the 0.021″ dilator was removed with manual pressure. If the VCD failed to achieve hemostasis, the distal access was upsized to a 7 Fr sheath for carrying out endovascular repair of the TAVR access. If the distal access was upsized to 7 Fr, that access was treated with VCD. The patients were monitored for acute in-hospital complication and followed for 6 months.ResultsDuring 2017 & 2018, 97.4% of 186 TAVRs were performed via femoral approach at our center. Six patients met the criteria for high-risk access and non-availability of the contralateral “up and over” approach. Of the 6 patients enrolled in this prospective study, 3 required endovascular management of TAVR access because of failed VCDs and were treated with covered stents using the distal ipsilateral access. The remaining 3 patients had successful use of VCDs for the TAVR access and the prophylactic access with 0.021″ dilator was managed with manual pressure. None of the six patients suffered any further vascular complication or bleeding. At the 6-month follow up no vascular complications or clinically driven events were identified from the TAVR access or additional distal ipsilateral access.ConclusionThis novel technique of prophylactic ipsilateral distal femoral access can provide an alternative bailout strategy for patients at high risk of closure device failure and unavailable contralateral femoral approach during transfemoral TAVR.     

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty in young adults by antegrade,transseptal approach using Inoue balloon

Transvenous, transseptal, antegrade balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) was successfully performed in 16 consecutive young adults with noncalcific aortic stenosis using Inoue balloon catheter. There were 13 males and three females, with a mean age of 20.4 ± 5.8 years (range 14–30 years). All the patients had normal left ventricular systolic function. All procedures were performed electively by the antegrade technique, except the initial index case in whom, the stenosed aortic valve could not be crossed retrogradely. Dilatation was performed using stepwise technique keeping the balloon:annulus ratio ≤100% in all the cases. Transaortic peak systolic gradient decreased from 113.4 ± 42.6 (range 70–210) mm Hg to 11.2 ± 9.2 (range 4–32) mm Hg; P = 0.0005. Following BAV, three patients developed grade 2⁺ aortic regurgitation, who were managed medically. None of the patients developed tamponade, vascular complications, excessive bleeding, or thromboembolism. Significant left to right atrial shunt (Qp/Qs ≥ 1.5:1) was observed in one case. The average procedure time was 20 ± 8 min (range 18–35 min). On follow-up (n = 11 patients) at 4 ± 1.5 months (range 2–7 months) all the patients were asymptomatic. Doppler transaortic peak systolic gradient was found to be 15 ± 10.3 mm Hg (range 4–36 mm Hg). Antegrade BAV technique using Inoue balloon for noncalcific aortic stenosis in young adults is safe, effective and may be technically advantageous. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Diagn. 44:297–301, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.