REVIEW: Hepatitis B and liver transplantation

Liver transplantation in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patients is very commonly followed by recurrence of infection in the transplanted liver. Most recipients with HBV recurrence will develop chronic hepatitis that follows a more aggressive course than is seen in non-immuno-compromized subjects and this frequently results in graft failure. The presence of hepatitis B e antigen or significant levels of HBV-DNA in the serum is highly predictive of recurrence and this has led to the view that patients, whose serum is positive for these conventional markers of replication, should be excluded from transplantation. The key to improving the results of transplantation in patients with HBV infection lies in the development of effective strategies to prevent reinfection. High dose anti-HBs immunoglobulin is effective in patients who are coinfected with hepatitis D, those transplanted for fulminant hepatitis and cirrhotic patients who have very low levels of viral replication prior to transplantation. Unfortunately, immunoprophylaxis does not seem to influence the outcome in those patients with higher levels of replication. There are several new orally active nucleoside analogues that are potent inhibitors of hepatitis B replication that may be effective for both the prevention and treatment of recurrent disease. The most promising are lamivudine (2',3', dideoxy, 3', thiacytidine) and famciclovir (a guanosine analogue). Both agents have been extensively evaluated in animal models of HBV and have been shown to rapidly suppress viral replication. The initial experience with these agents in liver transplant recipients has been promising and a number of studies are currently underway to determine whether these drugs, used alone or in combination with immunoprophylaxis, are able to prevent recurrence in those patients at highest risk of post-transplant HBV recurrence.     

Liver transplantation for hepatitis B

Up to now the outcomes of liver transplantation in patients with chronic viral hepatitis B have not been very good because the recurrence of viral hepatitis in the graft has been high and resulted in a high early graft failure of liver transplant recipients. However, the administration of a combined therapy with lamivudine and hyperimmune anti-HBs globulin has led to a marked improvement in transplantation results and an increase in the number of liver transplantations for this indication. Four men (aged 47 to 55 years) underwent liver transplantation for cirrhosis, caused by chronic viral hepatitis B, at our centre. All were HBsAg carriers. They were our first patients who received therapy with the combined immunoprophylactic regimen of lamivudine and hyperimmune anti-HBs globulin. HBV DNA negativity was achieved in all patients prior to transplantation; three of them were pretreated with lamivudine. At 4 to 17 months of follow-up, sustained suppression of HBV replication (HBV DNA negativity) was maintained in all four patients. No complications associated with this treatment were observed and no emergence of resistant mutants was detected. The combined therapy for chronic viral hepatitis B administered to liver transplant recipients at our centre showed very good outcomes. However, the development of resistant mutants during this therapy poses a problem, which may hopefully be overcome with the use of new antivirotics, such as adefovir or tenofovir.     

Prevention and Treatment of Recurrent Hepatitis B after Liver Transplantation

Chronic hepatitis B is a global health problem that leads to development of various complications, such as cirrhosis, liver cancer, and liver failure requiring liver transplantation. The recurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) post-liver transplantation is a major cause of allograft dysfunction, cirrhosis of the allograft, and graft failure. Patients with high viral load at the time of transplantation, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positivity, or those with a history of anti-viral drug resistance are considered as high-risk for recurrent HBV post-liver transplantation, while patients with low viral load, including HBeAg negative status, acute liver failure, and hepatitis D virus (HDV) co-infection are considered to be at low-risk for recurrent HBV post-liver transplantation. Antivirals for patients awaiting liver transplantation(LT) cause suppression of HBV replication and reduce the risk of recurrent HBV infection of the allograft and, therefore, all HBV patients with decompensated cirrhosis should be treated with potent antivirals with high genetic barrier to resistance (entecavir or tenofovir) prior to liver transplantation. Prevention of post-liver transplantation recurrence should be done using a combination of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and antivirals in patients at high risk of recurrence. Low dose HBIG, HBIG-free protocols, and monoprophylaxis with high potency antivirals can still be considered in patients at low risk of recurrence. Even, marginal grafts from anti-HBc positive donors can be safely used in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) negative, preferably in anti-hepatitis B core (HBc)/anti-hepatitis B surface (HBs) positive recipients. In this article, we aim to review the mechanisms and risk factors of HBV recurrence post-LT in addition to the various treatment strategies proposed for the prevention of recurrent HBV infection     

Liver transplantation for chronic viral hepatitis.

Liver transplantation remains a problem for end stage liver disease due to chronic viral hepatitis, in contrast to the success with fulminant hepatitis B, D and C in which recurrence of viraemia is relatively rare. Following transplantation for chronic HCV disease recurrence of hepatitis C is infrequent and does not appear to be an important clinical problem. The complete picture will only be described when a suitable HCV-RNA test becomes routinely available. Patients with cirrhosis due to hepatitis B, with low levels of viraemia, or patients with hepatitis D are less likely to develop reinfection than those with high levels of HBV viraemia. The use of hepatitis B immunoglobulin in high doses for prolonged periods delays rather than prevents recurrence. It is a very expensive ancillary treatment. Patients with chronic hepatitis D related cirrhosis in whom levels of hepatitis B replication are suppressed, have a low recurrence rate even without immunoglobulin prophylaxis although HDAg remains in the liver. Hepatitis only reoccurs with recurrence of HBV infection. Unfortunately transplantation of HBV DNA and HBeAg positive patients has many shortcomings, and reinfection of the engrafted liver and subsequent development of hepatitis B is common. Survival rates are reduced in this latter group. At present there are no firm recommendations that can be given to prevent recurrence: HBIG in large doses and for prolonged periods would appear to be insufficient to prevent reinfection and these patients often die of recurrent disease. A major challenge for transplant groups will be the prevention of viral reinfection particularly in this latter group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

De novo hepatitis B infection after liver transplantation--evidence for the need of active hepatitis B vaccination of liver transplantation candidates

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LTX) is a generally accepted therapy in the treatment of acute and chronic end-stage liver diseases. Recurrent and de-novo hepatitis B and C virus infection following liver transplantation have been shown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed retrospectively the course of patients treated at our transplant center between 01.01.1992 and 31.12.1997, who does not show any markers of an active hepatitis B (HBV) infection prior to liver transplantation but developed replicative HBV infection afterwards. During this period 544 liver transplantations were performed in 452 patients, 395 of whom were HBs-Ag negative prior to transplantation. RESULTS: Six patients were identified who underwent LTX for non-hepatitis B-induced liver disease, and who subsequently developed a highly replicative de-novo HBV-infection six to twelve months (mean 8.5 months) after LTX. In each of the patients HBV de-novo infection showed clinically and biochemically a mild but chronic course without evidence of liver failure during a maximum follow-up period of 14 to 37 months (mean 26 months). Liver biopsies taken in four patients nine to 22 months after LTX showed chronic active hepatitis (n = 2), chronic portal hepatitis (n = 1), and a mild rejection (n = 1). The source of de-novo HBV infections remained unclear, but inapparent infection of patients pre-LTX was ruled out so that the donor livers or postoperative infection appear to be the likely source. CONCLUSION: In our center the number of HBV de-novo infections (1.5%, 6/395) following liver transplantation was comparable to the results published by other centers, but in our center no inapparent infection of patients prior to LTX was observed. For further minimization of HBV de-novo infection following LTX active HBV immunization of patients awaiting LTX is recommended.     

Role of lamivudine in the reactivation of hepatitis B virus infection in immunodepressed patients.

INTRODUCTION: hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in immunocompromised states is a well-known event that may be a serious problem in endemic areas of infection. Presently, the investigation of hepatitis B status has been recommended prior to receiving cytotoxic treatment. Lamivudine has been used in the reactivation of HBV in immunocompromised states. We report our corresponding data for lamivudine in the treatment of HBV reactivation after intensive chemotherapy in patients with lymphoma and after kidney transplantation. CLINICAL OBSERVATION: we present two cases of HBV reactivation after chemotherapy for lymphoma and two cases after cadaveric renal transplantation treated with lamivudine (100-150 mg/day). RESULTS: we observed a prompt clinical improvement in all patients after lamivudine treatment. Furthermore, laboratory data showed a rapid biochemical and antiviral response. However, the response in lymphoma patients was quicker than in patients who had post-transplantation reactivation of HBV. Therapy was well tolerated and no relevant side effects appeared during follow-up (twenty four months). The HBV remained negative in three cases. CONCLUSION: lamivudine is effective and safe in the treatment of HBV reactivation in immunodepressed patients. Lamivudine therapy should be considered for the treatment of HBV reactivation in patients with prior hepatitis B or chronic hepatitis B with inactive viral replication.     

Nucleoside analogues and other antivirals for treatment of hepatitis B in the peritransplant period

Chronic HBV infection is a common cause of advanced liver disease that is associated with substantial mortality. Furthermore, chronic hepatitis B was historically a controversial indication for liver transplantation because of a low post-transplant survival, with graft infection being the major contributor to adverse outcomes. The initial use of hepatitis B immune globulin as prophylaxis, followed later by combined therapy with lamivudine, markedly reduced viral recurrence and improved the survival of patients transplanted for acute or chronic hepatitis B with liver failure. Lamivudine alone can also be used for long-term prophylaxis against de novo HBV infection that can be transmitted by organs from donors positive for anti-HBc or anti-HBs. When used in patients with decompensated chronic hepatitis B with cirrhosis, lamivudine has been shown to improve clinical manifestations, prolong pretransplant survival, and defer, or even obviate, the need for transplantation. Despite prophylaxis, viral mutations with breakthrough reinfection may occur and lead to liver failure. The recently approved adefovir dipivoxil, which is active against lamivudine-resistant mutation, and other nucleoside analogs that are in various phases of development, offer hope as rescue therapy for viral recurrence. Other therapeutic alternatives in the future may include gene therapy and immune interventions.     

Application of nucleoside analogues to liver transplant recipients with hepatitis B

Hepatitis B is a common yet serious infectious disease of the liver, affecting millions of people worldwide. Liver transplantation is the only possible treatment for those who advance to end-stage liver disease. Donors positive for hepatitis B virus(HBV) core antibody(HBc Ab) have previously been considered unsuitable for transplants. However, those who test negative for the more serious hepatitis B surface antigen can now be used as liver donors, thereby reducing organ shortages. Remarkable improvements have been made in the treatment against HBV, most notably with the development of nucleoside analogues(NAs), which markedly lessen cirrhosis and reduce post-transplantation HBV recurrence. However, HBV recurrence still occurs in many patients following liver transplantation due to the development of drug resistance and poor compliance with therapy. Optimized prophylactic treatment with appropriate NA usage is crucial prior to liver transplantation, and undetectable HBV DNA at the time of transplantation should be achieved. NA-based and hepatitis B immune globulin-based treatment regimens can differ between patients depending on the patients' condition, virus status, and presence of drug resistance. This review focuses on the current progress in applying NAs during the perioperative period of liver transplantation and the prophylactic strategies using NAs to prevent de novo HBV infection in recipients of HBc Ab-positive liver grafts.     

Liver transplantation for viral hepatitis in 2015

Liver transplantation(LT) is a life-saving treatment forpatients with end-stage liver disease and for patients with liver cell cancer related to liver disease. Acute and chronic liver diseases related to hepatitis viruses are between the main indications for liver transplantation. The risk of viral reinfection after transplantation is the main limiting factor in these indications. Before the availability of antiviral prophylaxis, hepatitis B virus(HBV) recurrence was universal in patients who were HBV DNA-positive before transplantation. The natural history of recurrent HBV was accelerated by immunosuppression, and it progressed rapidly to graft failure and death. Introduction of post-transplant prophylaxis with immunoglobulin alone first, and associated to antiviral drugs later, drastically reduced HBV recurrence, resulting in excellent long-term outcomes. On the contrary, recurrence of hepatitis C is the main cause of graft loss in most transplant programs. Overall, patient and graft survival after LT for hepatitis C virus(HCV)-associated cirrhosis is inferior compared with other indications. However, successful pretransplant or post transplant antiviral therapy has been associated with increased graft and overall survival. Until recently, the combination of pegylated interferon and ribavirin was the standard of care for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C. Highly active antiviral compounds have been developed over the past decade, thanks to new in vitro systems to study HCV entry, replication, assembly, and release.     

Management of hepatitis B virus infection after liver transplantation

Chronic hepatitis B virus(HBV) infection is responsible for up to 30% of cases of liver cirrhosis and up to 53% of cases of hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver transplantation(LT) is the best therapeutic option for patients with end-stage liver failure caused by HBV. The success of transplantation, though, depends on receiving prophylactic treatment against post-transplant viral reactivation. In the absence of prophylaxis, liver transplantation due to chronic hepatitis B(CHB) is associated with high rates of viral recurrence and poor survival. The introduction of treatment with hepatitis B immunoglobulins(HBIG) during the 1990 s and later the incorporation of oral antiviral drugs have improved the prognosis of these patients. Thus, LT for CHB is now a universally accepted option, with an estimated 5 years survival of around 85% vs the 45% survival seen prior to the introduction of HBIG. The combination of lamivudine plus HBIG has for many years been the most widely used prophylactic regimen. However, with the appearance of new more potent oral antiviral agents associated with less resistance(e.g., entecavir and tenofovir) for the treatment of CHB, new prophylactic strategies are being designed, either in combination with HBIG or alone as a monotherapy. These advances have allowed for more personalized prophylaxis based on the individual risk profile of a given patient. In addition, the small pool of donors has required the use of anti-HBc-positive donors(with the resulting possibility of transmitting HBV from these organs), which has been made possible by suitable prophylactic regimens.     

Management of Hepatitis B Virus Coinfection: HIV, Hepatitis C Virus, Hepatitis D Virus

Coinfection of hepatitis B virus (HBV) with HIV, hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis D virus (HDV) is common because of shared modes of transmission. Increasing prevalence of high risk sexual behavior and intra venous drug use (IVDU) contributes to a majority of the cases with coinfection. Occult HBV or prior HBV infection is frequently encountered in patients coinfected with HIV or HCV. Although HBV is a preventable disease, failure to screen and inadequate vaccination in the high risk individuals account for vast under-recognition of the cases with HBV infection. Chronic liver disease from viral hepatitis B and C has emerged as the major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide as well as in the United States. This is especially true in cases coinfected with HIV. The potential long term risks of untreated hepatitis include cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. There have been several advancements in the understanding of natural history and management options of chronic viral hepatitis. This article discusses and reviews the natural history, epidemiology, and management of HBV patients coinfected with HIV, HCV, or HDV. It includes an updated summary of the outcomes with liver transplantation and post transplant recurrence in the coinfected population with HBV. It also discusses the role of occult HBV in HIV and HCV coinfection respectively.     

Indications for liver transplantation in patients with chronic hepatitis B and C virus infection and hepatocellular carcinoma

Patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection were not accepted for liver transplantation in Asia in the past because the hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) used to prevent post‐transplantation recurrence was very expensive and it was generally believed that Asians with hepatitis B fared worse than Caucasians after liver transplantation. The availability of lamivudine has altered the indication of liver transplantation for these patients. Twenty‐five Chinese patients with chronic HBV infection were given lamivudine as primary prophylaxis against HBV re‐infection before transplantation. Five patients died within 40 days of transplantation. After a median follow‐up period of 14 months (range, 5–39), 17 patients had lost serum HBsAg from 4 days to 27 months post transplantation, but it reappeared in three patients 4–12 months later. Antibody to HBsAg was detected periodically in the serum of 11 patients who had lost HBsAg. At the last follow‐up, six patients were HBsAg‐positive and HBV DNA was detected in only one of them. The indication for liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is not as strict as for patients with chronic HBV infection because the long‐term survival is similar to that of non‐hepatitis C patients, even though re‐infection by HCV in the recipients is nearly universal. The main issue in the selection of patients with HCV for liver transplantation is therefore identification of criteria that can predict re‐infection and development of cirrhosis. These include factors such as multiple episodes of rejection, use of OKT3, pre‐transplant viral load and genotype, but reports are not consistent and so there are no well‐defined selection criteria. The selection criteria for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma are now well defined. Many studies have confirmed that a tumour > 5 cm, and showing vascular invasion, and poor differentiation adversely affects survival. In practice, only patients with a tumour < 5 cm and Child’s C cirrhosis are accepted for liver transplantation. Transarterial oily chemoembolization and intralesional alcohol injection are used to control or down‐stage the tumour while patients wait for a cadaveric liver graft.     

Hepatitis B transplantation: special conditions

Patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection may be coinfected with other viral diseases, such as hepatitis C virus (HCV) and/or D virus (HDV), or have serious diseases secondary to the hepatitis, such as hepatocellular carcinoma. These coexisting conditions have an impact on the success of treatment and of liver transplantation. Patients with HBV and HDV are at lower risk for HBV recurrence than are patients with HBV alone; likewise, patients with HBV/HCV coinfection appear to have a higher 5-year survival rate posttransplantation. Treatment of coinfection is similar to that used for HBV alone. Hepatitis B immune globulin and interferon have been found to be effective in varying degrees. Recurrence or reinfection of disease after liver transplantation presents many clinical problems that will require new therapeutic approaches. Future studies will help to begin solving these challenges.     

Chronic viral hepatitis in kidney transplantation

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in potential kidney transplant candidates-once considered absolute contraindications to kidney transplantation-no longer creates overt barriers to transplantation. Advances in the medical management of HBV and HCV infection have created opportunities for a substantial number of patients to be effectively treated with antiviral therapy before transplantation. For HBV infection, a number of new drugs enable clearance of the virus with minimal adverse effects and drug resistance. Pretransplantation antiviral therapy is advisable for patients with HCV infection, but adverse effects are common and viral eradication remains challenging. Regardless of viral clearance, pretransplant patients without bridging fibrosis (as confirmed by liver biopsy) or clinical stigmata of cirrhosis should be considered for kidney transplantation as survival is superior when compared to treatment with dialysis, and progression of liver disease is unlikely. For patients with advanced liver disease, simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation is an important consideration. These treatment advances further increase the burden of organ donor shortage; however, organs from deceased donors with chronic HBV or HCV infection could be efficiently allocated to certain individuals with a viral infection of the same type to increase the pool of available transplant organs.     

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus in a hepatitis B surface antigen-negative patient with rheumatoid arthritis treated with methotrexate

Immunosuppressive therapy can induce viral reactivation in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and, more rarely, in patients with resolved HBV infection. We report the case of a 57-year-old Japanese woman with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who developed de-novo hepatitis B virus-related hepatitis after methotrexate (MTX) therapy. Entecavir and oral prednisolone following steroid pulse therapy were administered and her liver function recovered. MTX is widely used for RA for its efficiency and safety. But some cases of HBV reactivation caused by MTX, including de-novo hepatitis, have been reported. Considering these conditions, more attention should be paid when using MTX in patients with RA. And more studies are needed to determine who needs screening of HBV, monitoring of HBV-DNA, and prophylaxis with chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy.     

Posttransplantation: future therapies

Recent advances in prophylaxis and treatment of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after liver transplantation have improved the outcome of liver transplantation for hepatitis B. Currently, the long-term use of hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) and/or nucleoside analogues are the only effective therapies to prevent or ameliorate HBV recurrence in liver transplant patients. However, they are very expensive, and breakthrough infections due to resistant HBV mutants are not infrequent. New strategies are being sought to decrease the risks of breakthrough infection and to increase the cost-effectiveness of liver transplantation for hepatitis B. Vaccination to prevent de novo infection is strongly recommended before transplantation, despite a decreased response in this immunosuppressed population. Adoptive transfer of immunity with such therapies as bone marrow or cytotoxic T lymphocyte transplants or xenotransplantation of an organ from a donor, which is not susceptible to infection by HBV may be effective in preventing or treating recurrent HBV posttransplantation. In addition, gene therapies and use of nucleoside and nucleotide analogues to disrupt various stages of the HBV life cycle may prevent or slow viral replication or assembly of the virus. Ultimately, the most effective therapy for the prevention of recurrent hepatitis B after liver transplantation will involve a combination of HBIG with one or more of the new antiviral agents.     

Genotypes, mutations, and viral load of hepatitis B virus and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: HBV properties and hepatocarcinogenesis

Chronic infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the major risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) worldwide. Ten HBV genotypes (A-J) have been discovered so far. Genotypes B and C are endemic in East and Southeast Asia. Genotype C HBV is associated with increased risks of cirrhosis and HCC. Genotype B (B2) is associated with the development of HCC in non-cirrhotic patients younger than 50 years and with relapse of HCC after surgical treatment. It is also associated with earlier hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion than genotype C. High HBV load is independently associated with the occurrence and post-treatment recurrence of HCC. Different genotypes have distinct patterns of mutations. Viral mutations in the core promoter region and in the preS region are frequently found to be significantly associated with an increased risk of HCC. These mutations often occur before the onset of HCC and accumulate during the progression of chronic HBV infection. Multiple such mutations are more frequent in patients with HCC and are specific for HCC. HBV subgenotypes, viral mutations, and viral load can be used for the prediction of HCC. Early identification of HBV-infected individuals who will eventually develop HCC will help to develop active prophylactic protocols to reduce or delay the occurrence of HCC.     

High pre-treatment serum hepatitis B virus titre predicts failure of lamivudine prophylaxis and graft re-infection after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Orthotopic liver transplantation has an established role for the treatment of patients with chronic liver failure secondary to hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Unfortunately, recurrent infection of the graft can be associated with aggressive disease, and with diminished graft and patient survival. Currently, the role of nucleoside analogues for prevention of graft re-infection is being evaluated. Preliminary results are encouraging, but treatment failure has been associated with emergence of drug-resistant virus. METHODS: We have studied ten consecutive patients who received lamivudine prophylaxis for prevention of HBV graft reinfection. Sequential sera, collected prelamivudine then during treatment before and after liver transplantation, were examined. Conventional serological markers were measured, as were serum viral DNA levels with a sensitive quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay. RESULTS: Lamivudine treatment effected a reduction in serum HBV levels, but six patients still had measurable viral DNA at the time of transplantation. Five patients developed graft re-infection with lamivudine-resistant virus. Resistant virus emerged 8 to 15 months post-transplant. The likelihood of emergence of resistant virus was related to the pre-treatment serum HBV titre. Persistent serum viral DNA positivity and evidence of graft re-infection during the early post-transplant period did not predict the subsequent emergence of resistant virus. CONCLUSIONS: Our observations suggest that the resistant species may be present in the viral quasispecies in the serum and liver of patients with high-level replication prior to lamivudine exposure. The resistant species can persist during lamivudine treatment prior to transplantation, and emerge following transplantation. These observations suggest strategies which might prevent the emergence of drug-resistant species, and imply that graft re-infection may be a preventable phenomenon.     

Hepatitis B viral load predicts survival of HCC patients undergoing systemic chemotherapy

HCC is a common cause of morbidity and mortality. For patients who are not candidates for curative surgery, systemic chemotherapy is one of the standard treatments. In parts of China and the Far East, over 80% of HCC patients have chronic HBV infection. In this study, we aimed to assess the relationship between pre-chemotherapy HBV viral load and the survival of HCC patients. HBV infection status was determined prior to chemotherapy in 188 patients, 170 of whom had evidence of HBV chronic infection/exposure (160 hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg]-positive, 10 HBsAg-negative/hepatitis B core antibody-positive). Of these, 125 had pretreatment HBV DNA levels determined via real-time PCR. Virological data were analyzed using conventional clinical variables to identify factors that influenced survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that high total bilirubin (P = 0.0016; hazard ratio = 1.040 per 1 muM increase; 95% CI 1.015-1.065), HCV infection (P = 0.0095; hazard ratio = 6.955; 95% CI 1.606-30.129), and high HBV DNA level (P = 0.0217; hazard ratio = 1.650; 95% CI 1.076-2.531) affected survival significantly. Exploratory analysis revealed that high levels of pretreatment HBV DNA had a significantly higher incidence of severe hepatitis during chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: For HCC patients with HBV chronic infection/exposure, a high viral load prior to treatment is an adverse factor for survival and may be associated with a higher incidence of severe hepatitis during chemotherapy. Future strategies to improve the prognosis of HCC patients undergoing chemotherapy should consider supportive therapy that incorporates antiviral therapies to reduce HBV viral load.     

A prophylactic approach for bone marrow transplantation from a hepatitis B surface antigen-positive donor

It has been accepted that bone marrow transplantation (BMT)is the only curative therapeutic option for certain hematologic malignancies.The southeast Asia region is an endemic area of hepatitis B virus(HBV)infection;thus,BMT using a hepatitis B surface antigen(HBsAg)-positive donor is occasionally unavoidable.Organ transplantation using a HBsAg-positive donor can lead to post-transplantation de novo HBV infection and severe HBV-related hepatitis if no effective prophylactic measures are taken prior to and after transplantation.In this report,a four-level approach was designed for a patient with chronic myeloid leukemia,beginning with a booster HBV vaccination before performing BMT with a HBsAg-positive donor.Prior to BMT,the HBV viral load of the donor was reduced to an undetectable level by antiviral therapy.After BMT,hepatitis B immunoglobulin was administered intramuscularly for 1 wk together with a long-term antiviral drug,lamivudine.One year after discontinuation of lamivudine,the patient is still free of HBV infection.