Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) are faint sounds generated by healthy inner ears that provide a window into the study of auditory mechanics. All vertebrate classes exhibit OAEs to varying degrees, yet the biophysical origins are still not well understood. Here, we analyzed both spontaneous (SOAE) and stimulus-frequency (SFOAE) otoacoustic emissions from a bird (barn owl,
Tyto alba) and a lizard (green anole,
Anolis carolinensis). These species possess highly disparate macromorphologies of the inner ear relative to each other and to mammals, thereby allowing for novel insights into the biomechanical mechanisms underlying OAE generation. All ears exhibited robust OAE activity, and our chief observation was that SFOAE phase accumulation between adjacent SOAE peak frequencies clustered about an integral number of cycles. Being highly similar to published results from human ears, we argue that these data indicate a common underlying generator mechanism of OAEs across all vertebrates, despite the absence of morphological features thought essential to mammalian cochlear mechanics. We suggest that otoacoustic emissions originate from phase coherence in a system of coupled oscillators, which is consistent with the notion of “coherent reflection” but does not explicitly require a mammalian-type traveling wave. Furthermore, comparison between SFOAE delays and auditory nerve fiber responses for the barn owl strengthens the notion that most OAE delay can be attributed to tuning.Numerous fundamental biophysical questions regarding cochlear mechanics remain unanswered, such as the relative dominance between viscous and inertial fluid forces affecting the stimulation of hair cells and the longitudinal coupling between them (
1,
2). These aspects, combined with relative experimental inaccessibility, have led to much uncertainty with regard to the micromechanics at work in the organ of Corti, and thereby precisely how auditory information is initially peripherally encoded (i.e., forward transduction). One area in which there is broad agreement, however, is the notion of an “active” ear: A nonlinear amplification mechanism(s) (i.e., reverse transduction) boosts detection of low-level sounds and compresses a wide range of sound intensities into a narrower range of vibration magnitude (
3). One manifestation of this process is the existence of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs), sounds measurable noninvasively in the external ear canal using a sensitive microphone (
4). Because only healthy ears tend to emit, OAEs have had a significant clinical impact (e.g., pediatric audiology). Emissions can arise spontaneously (SOAEs) or be evoked by an external stimulus. In fact, SOAEs are commonly pointed to as salient evidence for active amplification, especially given their connections to perception such as “rippling” in audiograms (threshold microstructure), indicative of localized changes in detection thresholds (
5,
6). SOAEs are, however, idiosyncratic in nature: Not all mammalian species have them, whereas several nonmammalian classes such as lizards exhibit robust activity. Humans have a high incidence of SOAEs, although some (healthy) ears have them but others do not. So, although SOAEs are not required per se for sensitive hearing, they provide a powerful and noninvasive means to study the function of the inner ear.A common thread through vertebrate OAEs studies is that of an active oscillator, typically a stereovillar hair cell, acting as the essential transducer (
3,
7–
10). A comprehensive theory for SOAE generation across vertebrates is lacking, however, because knowledge of hair cell physiology has not yet been well connected to the collective behavior of the system as a whole. Vertebrate ears contain anywhere from 50 to 20,000 hair cells, all coupled together to varying degrees. Two different, and seemingly diametric, theoretical approaches explaining SOAEs have emerged. One model class considers the ear as a system of coupled nonlinear oscillators exhibiting a limit cycle (
3,
11–
13). Typically, these models are “local” in that a given oscillator is only directly coupled to its nearest neighbors. The other class focuses predominantly on the mammalian cochlea (
14–
19), where “global” coupling between elements arises from the hydromechanics that give rise to wave mechanics. One salient example is the standing wave model (
16), where the peak of the traveling wave and stapes act as the two reflecting boundaries with a nonuniform gain medium in between, somewhat akin to a laser. That study predicted and verified interrelationships between spontaneous and evoked OAEs. Furthermore, acknowledging that nonmammalian ears exhibit different mechanics, Shera (
16) proposed that the appearance of “standing waves” need not necessarily depend upon traveling waves along the basilar membrane (BM) but could arise via other mechanisms that create appropriate phase differences (e.g., delays due to tuning). Motivated by the uncertain role of BM traveling waves in nonmammals, our present goal was to exploit the large morphological differences that exist across vertebrate ears (
20) to gain quantitative insight into SOAE generation mechanisms.Here we focus on two different nonmammalian species: a bird, the barn owl, and a lizard, the green anole. Both species exhibit robust OAE activity (
21–
25). The barn owl (
Tyto alba), is known for its remarkable ability to hunt by auditory cues alone (
26). The peripheral auditory morphology, neurophysiology, and psychophysics of this species have been well characterized (
27–
30). Owl auditory nerve fiber (ANF) responses show average frequency tuning but have remarkably high phase-locking capabilities extending out to 10 kHz (
31). Furthermore, the tonotopic map along the basilar papilla (in contrast to the mammalian organ of Corti) is nonexponential, with representation of higher frequencies (5–10 kHz) greatly expanded. The role of BM waves is unknown in owls, although data from pigeons are suggestive of their existence in birds (
32). The inner ear of lizards is profoundly different from that of both humans and barn owls. In anoles, the short auditory papilla (∼0.5 mm) contains ∼150 hair cells and has no overlying tectorial membrane over the SOAE-producing cells (
33). Bundle orientations for hair cells in a given radial cross-section are arranged in a self-opposing fashion. Furthermore, there is ample evidence indicating a lack of a traveling wave on the BM (
34,
35). In this study, we systematically explored interrelationships within individual ears between SOAEs and stimulus frequency emissions (SFOAEs), the simplest type of evoked emission via a single low-level stimulus tone (
15). In short, we found that important OAE characteristics are shared between the two species and with published data from humans. This we interpret as revealing generic features of the underlying active processes.
相似文献